Tenant Advocates Descend on Albany, Refusing to Let ‘Good Cause’ Be Evicted from the Conversation

posted in: News | 0

As elected officials attempt to hammer out a housing deal before the state’s budget deadline at the end of the month, advocates want lawmakers to know they’re still fighting for tenant protections that aren’t watered down.

Chris Janaro

Tenant organizers with the Housing Justice for All Coalition rallying at the Capitol building in Albany on March 19, 2024.

During Tuesday’s early morning hours, tenants and housing organizers from across the state climbed aboard buses bound for Albany.

Drawing a crowd of over a thousand, advocates paraded through the corridors of the Capitol while others picketed at the main escalator in an act of civil disobedience.

Their plea to legislators was clear: to defend tenants’ rights during ongoing budget negotiations by demanding any new residential development deal include comprehensive, statewide “good cause” protections.

Sponsored by State Sen. Julia Salazar and Assemblymember Pamela Hunter, the bill would offer tenants new defenses against eviction and rent increases above a certain level—3 percent, or 150 percent of the Consumer Price Index, whichever is higher—so long as they keep up with their rent and do not engage in nuisance behavior.

“[Currently], a landlord doesn’t need a ‘good cause’ to evict a tenant who is in unregulated housing, which is the vast majority of rental housing in New York,” Salazar explained in an interview with City Limits at the end of February.

“What good cause would do is give tenants a defense in court,” she added. “It would seek to bring stability to communities as we’re facing a housing crisis. Housing is becoming really increasingly unaffordable for working people in New York State.”

Chris Janaro

Landlords would still be able to evict tenants who violated their leases or fell behind on rent, unless a court deemed the rent unreasonably high. The legislation also exempts owner-occupied buildings with fewer than four units.

But while progressive members of the legislature have sought to pass the bill for several years now, it’s faced fierce opposition from landlord and real estate groups, who say it would make it harder for building owners to keep up with maintenance costs and impede private sector investment in new development.

Some localities around the state, including the city of Albany, have passed local versions of the law only to have them struck down by legal challenges.

Above: Lawmakers and housing advocates held signs throughout the Capitol building. Photos by Chris Janaro.

Anna Leak, a tenant from Albany who rallied at the Capitol Tuesday, recounted her experience dealing with the aftermath of her building’s sale, which led to a halt in maintenance services and a surge in rent prices. Elder tenants in her building faced harassment, some being pressured for old rent receipts and threatened with eviction notices by the new landlords, she said.

It was only through collective organizing and legal action, operating under the protection of their local good cause law, that they managed to temporarily halt the rent hikes. But in March of last year, the tenant protections were struck down in court, and almost immediately, Leak  says, the rent increases began again, as high as double what they had been paying.

“All the previous tenants that have lived there were evicted one by one and in groups over the whole period of about a year,” said Leak, adding that she was recently served with a 90-day eviction notice herself due to a non-lease renewal.

“We were protected, and now we’re not. People are frightened to complain about maintenance issues because they are afraid that they would be evicted or next on the list,” she said.

Chris Janaro

Tenant organizers with the Housing Justice for All Coalition rallying at the Capitol building in Albany on March 19, 2024.

As lawmakers negotiate the state’s next budget, good cause supporters are looking to incorporate the bill into a grand housing deal that combines new development incentives with tenant protections. 

While developers are eager to bring back 421-a, a lapsed tax incentive for residential developers who include affordable housing in their projects, tenant advocates have long held that the benefit gave too much for too little, setting the stage for a potential compromise.  

But it’s still unclear how much of a compromise both sides are willing to make. Good cause supporters have pushed back against passing a watered down version of the bill, such as one that allows localities to opt into the legislation in lieu of statewide protections.

“Tenants across the state deserve protections against unreasonably high rent increases and being evicted for no good reason. The existing Good Cause eviction bill is strong public policy,” Salazar said in a statement to City Limits this week. “We are actively discussing the details, including the rent increase thresholds and the applicability of these protections in communities statewide.”

According to a recent report from Housing Justice For All (HJFA), the real estate industry spent almost $14 million lobbying in the state since 2019, including against good cause.

“The real estate industry is the most powerful lobby in the state, and for the past five years they have focused that power on fighting to preserve their ability to price-gouge tenants and evict families at-will,” said Cea Weaver, coalition director of HJFA in a statement. “It’s time that state lawmakers stand up to the real estate industry and deliver for tenants all over the state who are struggling to stay in their homes.”

In addition to good cause, those who took part in Tuesday’s rally are pushing for passage of the Housing Access Voucher Program, which would create a new state rental subsidy for New Yorkers experiencing or at risk of homelessness, as well as a bill that would make it easier for tenants to purchase their buildings.  

Chris Janaro

At one point during the rally, the police shut down power to the escalators in the Capitol building to stop the picket.

Housing advocates point to rising rent and real estate costs around the state as New York grapples with an affordable housing shortage, and the city’s homeless shelter population remains historically high

At one point during the rally, the police shut down power to the escalators in the Capitol building to stop the picket, but advocates, undeterred, continued climbing and descending the steps. No arrests were made.

By 3:30 p.m., tenant advocates climbed back aboard their respective buses to head home as renters across the state—who make up a little less than half the population—anxiously await the budget deadline at the end of the month.

Left: Protestors on the Capitol building escalators. Right: Steven Espinoza, Dahyana Mesa Escanio, and Samantha Bravo of Assemblymember Marcela Mitaynes’ office on the bus to Albany. Photos by Chris Janaro.

“Good cause eviction is the floor, not the ceiling,” Queens State Sen. Jessica Ramos said earlier in the day, speaking to rally goers at the Capitol.

 “Any housing bill that comes out of this building must have good cause with it.”

To reach the reporter behind this story, contact Chris@citylimits.org. To reach the editor, contact Jeanmarie@citylimits.org

Want to republish this story? Find City Limits’ reprint policy here.

Prince Harry says tabloids intercepted phone calls of mother, the late Princess Diana, and father

posted in: Politics | 0

By BRIAN MELLEY (Associated Press)

LONDON (AP) — Prince Harry alleged Thursday that the publisher of The Sun tabloid unlawfully intercepted phone calls of his late mother, Princess Diana, and father, now King Charles III, as he sought to expand his privacy invasion lawsuit against News Group Newspapers.

The Duke of Sussex is seeking permission during a three-day hearing in the High Court to allow the new claims to be added to his ongoing litigation after evidence surfaced largely through materials turned over by NGN, a subsidiary of the media empire built by Rupert Murdoch, his lawyer said.

Attorney David Sherborne said that the eavesdropping on Diana, her then-estranged husband, Charles, Prince of Wales at the time, and his then paramour, Camilla Parker Bowles, who is now Queen Camilla, inevitably revealed private information about Harry as early as age 9.

Diana was suspicious she was being followed and her calls were being listened to, the amended complaint said. Articles in The Sun and now-defunct News of the World referred to conversations Diana had with close confidants and show that journalists and paparazzi had inside knowledge where she was going to be, including her therapy sessions.

“The defendant’s newspapers described his late mother’s concerns as ’paranoid delusions,’ when the true position was that she was under close surveillance and her calls were being unlawfully intercepted by (NGN), which was known about by its editors and senior executives,” Sherborne said in court papers.

The new claims in Harry’s case follow allegations his lawyer raised Wednesday in the High Court that implicated Murdoch for taking part in the cover-up of unlawful information gathering at his newspapers or that he had “at the very least turned a blind eye” to it.

Harry is one of 45 claimants, including actor Hugh Grant and filmmaker Guy Ritchie, alleging that between 1994 and 2016 News Group journalists violated their privacy through widespread unlawful activity that included intercepting voicemails, tapping phones, bugging cars and using deception to access confidential information.

The claims also allege that executives lied about the wrongdoing and oversaw an effort to delete millions of emails and “buy” the silence of those who might tell the truth about what occurred.

Defense lawyer Anthony Hudson, who said the new allegations “appear to be designed to grab headlines,” said Harry waited too long to bring the new claims. He also said the prince hadn’t followed court procedure for doing so and that the new allegations were a distraction from issues in the case that is tentatively scheduled for trial in January.

NGN issued a statement Wednesday saying that the new allegations amounted to “unjustified inferences in a scurrilous and cynical attack” on former journalists, staff and senior executives at News International, now News UK, the parent of NGN.

Judge Timothy Fancourt, who is expected to rule later on the application to amend the lawsuit, previously rejected News Group’s efforts to toss out the case on the grounds that it was brought beyond the six-year limitation period.

But the judge did side with the newspaper in ruling that Harry and Grant could not pursue claims that journalists had eavesdropped on their voicemails because news of the so-called phone hacking scandal was so widespread they should have had knowledge of the activity to file lawsuits within the deadline.

Harry’s lawsuit against News Group Newspapers is one of three he’s brought against Britain’s biggest tabloids over alleged unlawful activity carried out by journalists and private investigators they hired that came to light after a phone hacking scandal erupted at News of the World in 2011.

Harry, 39, the younger son of King Charles III, has used the courts in his crusade against the press that is the source of a host of personal grievances.

He blames the news media for the death of his mother, who was killed in a car wreck while being pursued by paparazzi. He also said unbearable intrusions and racist attitudes of the British media were one of the reasons he and his biracial wife, former actor Meghan Markle, moved to the U.S.

His new claims include allegations The Sun hired a private investigator to dig up personal information on Meghan, including her Social Security number, mobile phone number and details about her family.

In December, Harry’s legal efforts paid off when Fancourt found phone hacking at Mirror Group Newspapers was “widespread and habitual.” In addition to a court judgment, he recently settled remaining allegations that included his legal fees. The total sum wasn’t announced, but he was due to receive an interim payment of 400,000 pounds ($508,000).

He has another case pending against the owner of the Daily Mail.

___

Find more of AP’s coverage at https://apnews.com/hub/royalty

Puerto Rican star Bad Bunny’s Saturday concert at Target Center is canceled

posted in: News | 0

Due to “unforeseen circumstances,” Saturday night’s Bad Bunny concert at Target Center has been canceled.

As of Thursday morning, the event was deleted from the Minneapolis basketball arena’s website, while Ticketmaster’s listing reads: “No action is required to obtain a refund. It will be processed to the original method of payment used at time of purchase, once funds are received from the Event Organizer, which is usually completed within 30 days.”

The 30-year-old Puerto Rican rapper/singer is the first non-English language act to stand as Spotify’s most streamed artist of the year, a role he held from 2020 to 2022, the latter of which also stands as the second biggest streaming year of any artist in Spotify history.

Related Articles

Music and Concerts |


Soulful singer Teddy Swims lets his guard down with new music

Music and Concerts |


Country star Blake Shelton added to the Minnesota State Fair Grandstand lineup

Music and Concerts |


Jeff Lynne’s ELO will return to Xcel Energy Center in September on the group’s final tour

Music and Concerts |


Review: Minnesota Philharmonic Orchestra’s ‘Pulse’ had a beat and you could dance to it

Music and Concerts |


Concert review: 21-year-old pop star Olivia Rodrigo charms sold-out crowd at the X

US Jews upset with Trump’s latest rhetoric say he doesn’t get to tell them how to be Jewish

posted in: Politics | 0

By PETER SMITH and TIFFANY STANLEY (Associated Press)

Since the start of his political career, Donald Trump has played on stereotypes about Jews and politics.

He told the Republican Jewish Coalition in 2015 that “you want to control your politicians” and suggested the audience used money to exert control. In the White House, he said Jews who vote for Democrats are “very disloyal to Israel.”

Two years ago, the former president hosted two outspoken antisemites for dinner at his Florida residence.

And this week, Trump charged that Jewish Democrats were being disloyal to their faith and to Israel. That had many American Jews taking up positions behind now-familiar political lines. Trump opponents accused him of promoting antisemitic tropes while his defenders suggested he was making a fair political point in his own way.

Jonathan Sarna, American Jewish history professor at Brandeis University, said Trump is capitalizing on tensions within the Jewish community.

“For people who hate Donald Trump in the Jewish community, certainly this statement will reinforce their sense that they don’t want to have anything to do with him,” he said. “For people who like Donald Trump in the Jewish community, they probably nod in agreement.”

To many Jewish leaders in a demographic that has overwhelmingly identified as Democratic and supported President Joe Biden in 2020, Trump’s latest comments promoted harmful antisemitic stereotypes, painting Jews as having divided loyalties and that there’s only one right way to be Jewish religiously.

“That escalation of rhetoric is so dangerous, so divisive and so wrong,” said Rabbi Rick Jacobs, president of the Union for Reform Judaism, the largest U.S. Jewish religious denomination. “This is a moment when Israel needs there to be more bipartisan support.”

But Matt Brooks, CEO of the Republican Jewish Coalition, said the president’s comments must be heard in context of the Israel-Gaza war and Democratic criticisms of the state of Israel.

“What the president was saying in his own unique style was giving voice to things I get asked about multiple times a day,” Brooks said. “How can Jews remain Democrats in light of what is going on?” He contended the Democratic Party is “no longer the pro-Israel bastion it used to be.”

More than 31,800 Palestinians have been killed in the Israeli offensive that followed Hamas’ Oct. 7 attack on southern Israel, in which militants killed some 1,200 people and took hostages. Much of northern Gaza has been leveled, and officials warned famine is imminent.

Trump’s comments followed a speech by Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer, the country’s highest-ranking Jewish official. Schumer, a Democrat, last week sharply criticized Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu ’s handling of the war in Gaza. Schumer called for new elections in Israel and warned the civilian toll was damaging Israel’s global standing.

“Any Jewish person that votes for Democrats hates their religion,” Trump retorted Monday on a talk show. “They hate everything about Israel.”

A cascade of Jewish voices, from Schumer to the Anti-Defamation League to religious leaders, denounced Trump’s statement.

In a statement to The Associated Press on Wednesday, the Trump campaign doubled down, criticizing Schumer, congressional Democrats’ support of Palestinians and the Biden administration’s policies on Iran and on aid to Gaza.

“President Trump is right,” said Karoline Leavitt, national press secretary for the Trump campaign.

Jeffrey Hert, an antisemitism expert at the University of Maryland, disagrees with Schumer’s call for a ceasefire in Gaza, but believes most Democrats support Israel — and he said a second Biden term would be better for it than a second Trump one.

“If (Trump) loses the 2024 election, his comments prepare the way for blaming the Jews for his defeat,” Herf said. “The clear result would be to fan the flames of antisemitism and assert that, yet again, the Jews are guilty.”

Related Articles

National Politics |


Nearly 8 in 10 AAPI adults in the US think abortion should be legal, an AP-NORC poll finds

National Politics |


No Labels struggles to recruit US presidential nominee

National Politics |


Election misinformation is a problem in any language. But some gets more attention than others

National Politics |


Biden tells Latino voters they’re the reason he defeated Trump in 2020 and says, ‘I need you back’

National Politics |


Judge clears way for Trump to appeal ruling keeping Fani Willis on Georgia 2020 election case

Sarna saw Trump as trying to appeal to politically conservative Jews, particularly the small but fast-growing Orthodox segment, who see Trump as a defender of Israel.

Also, about 10% of U.S. Jews are immigrants, according to a 2020 Pew Research Center report. Sarna said significant numbers are conservative.

At the same time, Democrats face the tension between their Jewish constituency, which is predominantly pro-Israel, and its progressive wing, which is more pro-Palestinian.

Sarna said that while it may seem odd to focus so much attention on subsections of a minority population, “elections in America are very close, and every vote counts.”

Conservative commentator Ben Shapiro said Tuesday on his podcast that Trump “was making a point that, frankly, I have made myself, which is that Jews who are voting Democrat do not understand the Democratic Party.” Shapiro, who practices Orthodox Judaism, contended the party “overlooks antisemitism” within its ranks.

Rabbi Jill Jacobs, the CEO of T’ruah, a rabbinic human rights organization, said Trump has no business dictating who’s a good Jew.

“By insinuating that good Jews will vote for the party that is best for Israel, Trump is evoking the age-old antisemitic trope of dual loyalty — an accusation that Jews are more loyal to their religion than to their country, and therefore can’t be trusted,” she said. “Historically, this accusation has fueled some of the worst antisemitic violence.”

In his own time in office, Trump’s policy “of supporting Prime Minister Netanyahu and the settler agenda only endangered Palestinians and Israelis and made peace more difficult to achieve,” Jacobs said.

Pittsburgh-based journalist Beth Kissileff — whose husband, a rabbi in the Conservative denomination of Judaism, in 2018 survived the nation’s deadliest antisemitic attack — said it was highly offensive for Trump to be a “self-appointed arbiter” of what it means to be Jewish.

“Chuck Schumer had every right to say what he said,” Kissileff added. “Just because we’re Jews, it doesn’t mean we agree with everything the (Israeli) government is doing. We have compassion for innocent Palestinian lives.”

Brooks, of the Republican Jewish Coalition, defended the former president against antisemitism charges, pointing to his presidential record as an example of proof.

Trump pursued policies that were popular among American Christian Zionists and Israeli religious-nationalists, including moving the U.S. embassy to Jerusalem and supporting Jewish settlements in occupied territories. His daughter Ivanka is a convert to Orthodox Judaism, and her husband and their children are Jewish. The couple worked as high-profile surrogates to the Jewish community during Trump’s administration.

Trump’s core supporters include white evangelicals, many of whom believe the modern state of Israel fulfills biblical prophecy. Prominent evangelicals who support Zionism have also been criticized for inflammatory statements about Jewish people.

Sixty-nine percent of Jewish voters in 2020 supported Biden, while 30% supported Trump, according to AP VoteCast, a survey of the electorate conducted in partnership with NORC at the University of Chicago. That made Jewish voters one of the religious groups where support for Biden was strongest. Also, 73% of Jewish voters in 2020 said that Trump was too tolerant of extremist groups.

Rabbi Bradley Shavit Artson said Trump’s comments are “in a complex middle zone” — not explicitly antisemitic, but reliant on such tropes.

American Jews base their votes on a complex mix of issues and values, “among them inclusion, diversity, climate change, civil rights,” said Artson, a leader within Conservative Judaism. “While they love Israel diversely, many of us also care about the wellbeing and self-determination of Palestinians.”

Associated Press reporters Mariam Fam and Amelia Thomson DeVeaux contributed to this report.

Associated Press religion coverage receives support through the AP’s collaboration with The Conversation US, with funding from Lilly Endowment Inc. The AP is solely responsible for this content.