By STEVEN SLOAN

WASHINGTON (AP) — For Democrats demoralized at being shut out of power in Washington, the past several months have offered reason for optimism.

A party often beset by ideological division has largely been unified in opposition to President Donald Trump’s hardline immigration tactics, particularly after two U.S. citizens were killed in Minneapolis. Heading into a midterm election year in which they are just a few seats shy of reclaiming the U.S. House majority, Democrats have also kept the White House on defense with criticism of Trump’s economic policies and ties to Jeffrey Epstein, the convicted sex offender.

But the U.S. and Israeli strikes against Iran could test the durability of that cohesion. Initially, Democrats balanced condemnation of Iran’s supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, who was killed over the weekend, with calls for Congress to quickly pass a war powers resolution that would restrain Trump’s attack options.

“As soon as our resolution comes to the floor, senators need to pick a side,” Senate Democratic leader Chuck Schumer said on Monday. “Stand with Americans who don’t want war, or stand with Donald Trump as he singlehandedly starts another war.”

Democratic divisions going into war powers vote

But some divisions are surfacing as a handful of Democrats, especially those who are strongly aligned with Israel, express reservations about the war powers measure. Rep. Greg Landsman, D-Ohio, won’t back an Iran resolution. Before the strike, Rep. Josh Gottheimer, D-N.J., also said he would vote no.

Sen. John Fetterman, D-Pa., who backed a war powers vote tied to Venezuela in January, also has broken with Democrats over the Iranian measure and rejected arguments that the attack was illegal, spurring frustration among some party leaders.

Sen. John Fetterman, D-Pa., arrives before President Donald Trump delivers the State of the Union address to a joint session of Congress in the House chamber at the U.S. Capitol in Washington, Tuesday, Feb. 24, 2026. (AP Photo/Matt Rourke)

“John Fetterman knows better,” House Democratic leader Hakeem Jeffries said Monday on CNN.

Republicans are also facing internal dissent. Trump, who did little to prepare Americans for the prospect of such a dramatic conflict, said Monday the operation could last four to five weeks. He hasn’t articulated a clear exit strategy and warns that American casualties could mount, which will pose a severe test of voter patience for the conflict.

The war could also lead to rising gas prices and economic volatility that may bolster Democratic arguments that the president is out of touch with the financial realities facing many Americans.

Still, Republicans see an opportunity to portray Democrats as reflexively opposed to Trump.

“For my Democratic colleagues, this is not about what’s best for our national security or what’s best for protecting the American people,” said Sen. John Kennedy, R-La. “This is about how to defeat Donald Trump.”

A searing debate among Democrats over Israel

Democrats have undergone a searing internal debate over the party’s relationship with Israel in the wake of the war in Gaza. Then-President Joe Biden’s loyalty to Israel during the heat of the 2024 campaign was starkly at odds with younger generations outraged by the treatment of Palestinians in Gaza. By the time Kamala Harris rose to the top of the ticket that year, she struggled to win over some younger voters who are critical to Democratic success.

Paco Fabian, the political director for the progressive advocacy group Our Revolution, acknowledged that Democrats “aren’t monolithic.” But he also suggested a shift was underway, noting the results of a New Jersey special election last month.

During that campaign, the affiliated super PAC of the pro-Israel American Israel Public Affairs committee sought to thwart the moderate candidate, Tom Malinowski, after he questioned unconditional aid to the Israeli government. Those efforts appeared to backfire with the more progressive contender, Analilia Mejia, winning the primary.

“Given what’s going on right now, I don’t think the moment is doing AIPAC and Israel any favors,” Fabian said.

Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., arrives at a secure facility in the basement of the Capitol for an intelligence briefing with Secretary of State Marco Rubio on the Iran war in Washington, Monday, March 2, 2026. (AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite)

Sympathy toward Israel appears to be shifting. Three years ago, 54% of Americans sympathized more with the Israelis, compared with 31% for the Palestinians, according to Gallup polling released last month. Now, their support is about evenly balanced, with 41% saying their sympathies lie more with the Palestinians, and only 36% saying the same about the Israelis.

Americans’ initial reactions to airstrikes also appeared more negative than positive, early polling suggested. About 6 in 10 U.S. adults disapproved of the U.S. decision to take military action in Iran, according to a CNN poll conducted via text message over the weekend. A separate snap poll from The Washington Post conducted via text message on Sunday suggested that about half of those polled opposed the strikes, while 39% were in support. Roughly 1 in 10 were unsure.

Democrats and independents drove much of the disapproval in those early polls, while Republicans were much more supportive.

Related Articles

Supreme Court blocks law against schools outing transgender students to their parents in California

Supreme Court preserves only GOP-held congressional district in New York City for 2026 elections

FACT FOCUS: Misrepresented images spread after US and Israel strike Iran

Ruben Gallego backs Graham Platner as Democrats split over Maine Senate race

Democratic moderates warn that leaning too far left in midterms sets up presidential loss in 2028

Elections this week could show impact of attacks

The initial political impact of the attacks in Iran could emerge as soon as Tuesday during the first primary elections of this year’s midterm campaign.

In North Carolina, Durham County Commissioner Nida Allam was already going into her bid to unseat two-term Rep. Valerie Foushee with backing from Our Revolution and other top progressives. After receiving support from groups tied to AIPAC during her 2022 campaign, Foushee’s campaign rejected such contributions this cycle. Over the weekend, she said she doesn’t support “Trump’s illegal war with Iran” and would back the war powers resolution.

Still, Allam, who would be the first Muslim elected to Congress from North Carolina, was quick to release a video ahead of Tuesday’s vote criticizing Trump for “starting another endless war” and promising to never accept support from “the pro-Israel lobby.”

In Texas, home to high-profile Senate primaries on Tuesday, Democratic voters expressed alarm at the attacks.

“It shouldn’t have happened,” said Charles Padmore, 45, an independent contractor in Houston. “Affordability should be the top priority on Trump’s list.”

Alex Diaz, 31, a biology high school teacher in Houston, called the bombing of Iran “uncalled for.”

“You’re trying to start World War III, and we don’t need that right now,” he said.

The fallout could spread to other contests this month. Ahead of the March 17 primary in Illinois, AIPAC-aligned groups have also criticized Daniel Biss, the Evanston mayor who is aiming to become the Democratic candidate to succeed the retiring Rep. Jan Schakowsky. In an interview, Biss spoke of the “backlash I’m hearing people have against AIPAC, their MAGA-aligned money and their Trump-aligned policy agenda.”

Asked about such predictions, Patrick Dorton, a spokesman for AIPAC’s affiliated super PAC, said “the key distinction will be between those who recognize that Iran is a murderous regime that tortures women for leaving their hair uncovered, hangs gay people, and executes peaceful democratic protestors, and those who will turn a blind eye to the regime’s atrocities.”

Calls for a ‘united opposition party’

As Congress moves toward a potential war powers vote this week, Biss said there was a need for Democrats to act as a “strong, clear, vocal, united opposition party.”

“I also would like to see the Democratic Party united not just on the procedural argument but on the basic acknowledgment that this war is wrong,” he added.

Sen. Richard Blumenthal, D-Ct., speaks during a Senate Homeland Committee hearing on Capitol Hill in Washington, Thursday, Feb. 12, 2026, in Washington. (AP Photo/Tom Brenner)

On Capitol Hill, Sen. Richard Blumenthal of Connecticut, a Democrat on the Armed Services Committee, said he was less concerned about party unity than the prospect of achieving a bipartisan vote on the war powers resolution.

“What I want to see happen is the war powers resolution pass,” he said. “I’m not focused on what Democrats as a whole do. We’re going to have differing opinions among Democrats and among Republicans.”

Associated Press journalists Linley Sanders in Washington and Juan Lozano in Houston contributed to this report.

By REFUGIO RUÍZ and FABIOLA SÁNCHEZ

GUADALAJARA, Mexico — The leader of the Jalisco New Generation Cartel was buried Monday in a shiny golden casket with enormous flower wreaths and a large military presence in the state that gave name to one of Mexico’s most powerful cartels.

A federal official confirmed that Nemesio Oseguera Cervantes, alias “El Mencho,” was buried in a cemetery in Zapopan, a suburb of Guadalajara, Mexico’s second-largest city. Dozens of people accompanied the funeral procession, many carrying black umbrellas on a sunny day and with a band playing Mexican regional music known as banda.

The official who discussed the location requested anonymity because they were not authorized to discuss the case. The Attorney General’s Office declined to confirm the location of El Mencho’s burial for “security reasons.”

There had been stepped up security since Sunday around a funeral home where large flower wreaths had been arriving without a name. Some did include the image of a rooster in flowers and Oseguera Cervantes was sometimes called the “Lord of the Roosters.”

The Mexican army killed Oseguera Cervantes just over a week ago while attempting to capture him. He died from multiple bullet wounds, according to the death certificate obtained by The Associated Press.

The killing set off violence in some 20 states. The death certificate fits with a description of the operation to capture Oseguera Cervantes given by Defense Secretary Ricardo Trevilla, who had said that the cartel leader and two bodyguards had been badly wounded in a gunfight with soldiers outside a home in Tapalpa, Jalisco. The three died en route to a hospital.

The certificate specified that Oseguera Cervantes had bullet wounds to his chest, abdomen and legs.

His body was taken to Mexico City where an autopsy was performed and then the body was turned over to his family on Saturday, the Attorney General’s Office said in a brief statement.

The death certificate also notes that Oseguera Cervantes was to be buried, standard practice in cases of violent deaths to allow for additional forensic evidence to be gathered if needed in the future. The document did not say where the burial would take place.

Authorities’ security concerns surrounding the burial location are well founded. Oseguera Cervantes’ killing set off retaliation by the cartel in numerous states. More than 70 people died between the military operation and the violence that followed. The government has said that security operations continue against other high-ranking members of the cartel.

It customary for an air of mystery to surround the burials of drug lords in Mexico, something their supporters take advantage of to try to elevate them to legend. Within hours of El Mencho’s death there were already ballads, known as narcocorridos, written about his killing.

In Culiacan, in neighboring Sinaloa state, home to a cartel of the same name, there is a cemetery known for its luxury crypts and mausoleums for one-time kingpins like Ignacio Coronel — an old associate of El Mencho — and Arturo Beltrán Leyva.

There was the drug lord who was famously killed twice, Nazario Moreno, leader of the violent and pseudo religious Knights Templar cartel who authorities said was killed in 2010 only to kill him for real in 2014.

Sometimes the bodies disappear, like in the case of Heriberto Lazcano, leader of the fearsome Zetas, whose body was stolen in 2012. Or they die under bizarre circumstances, like Amado Carrillo Fuentes, “Lord of the Skies,” who died in a botched plastic surgery.

___

Sánchez reported from Mexico City. AP writer María Verza in Mexico City contributed to this report.

Related Articles

Other voices: Killing of ‘El Mencho’ signals renewal in the US-Mexico relationship

The faces of Mexico’s disappeared haunt this city’s streets. Families worry they will be wiped away

Vadnais Heights couple recounts days of unrest in Puerto Vallarta

FIFA’s president has ‘complete confidence’ in Mexico to host World Cup games despite cartel violence

Mexico’s Diving World Cup canceled after violence surge in Jalisco

By WILL WEISSERT

WASHINGTON (AP) — President Donald Trump says he’ll attend this year’s White House Correspondent Association dinner on April 25, marking the first time he’s done so as commander-in-chief.

Related Articles

Supreme Court blocks law against schools outing transgender students to their parents in California

Supreme Court preserves only GOP-held congressional district in New York City for 2026 elections

FACT FOCUS: Misrepresented images spread after US and Israel strike Iran

Ruben Gallego backs Graham Platner as Democrats split over Maine Senate race

Democratic moderates warn that leaning too far left in midterms sets up presidential loss in 2028

“The White House Correspondents Association has asked me, very nicely, to be the Honoree at this year’s Dinner, a long and storied tradition since it began in 1924, under then President Calvin Coolidge,” Trump posted on his social media site on Monday evening.

He noted that the latest installment comes amid celebrations marking America’s 250th birthday, adding that it “will be my Honor to accept their invitation.”

Trump was invited annually, but never attended the dinner during his first term and also skipped last year’s gathering.

“For more than 100 years, the journalists of the White House Correspondents’ Association have enjoyed an evening with the president,” the association’s president, Weijia Jiang, said in a statement. “We’re happy the president has accepted our invitation and look forward to hosting him.”

The event was canceled due to the coronavirus pandemic in 2020 and 2021, but President Joe Biden attended each of the dinners during his term’s final three years. Every president since Coolidge had attended except Trump — until now. In his post Trump wrote that, “Because the Press was extraordinarily bad to me” he had “boycotted the event, and never went.”

“However, I look forward to being with everyone this year. Hopefully, it will be something very Special.”

The correspondents’ dinner debuted in 1921. Three years later, Coolidge became the first president to attend.

While all presidents but Trump went, not all did every year of their terms. Jimmy Carter and Richard Nixon opted not to, and Ronald Reagan — then recovering from an assassination attempt — missed the 1981 installment, but called in from Camp David.

Trump attended the correspondents dinner before he was president, and was the subject of mocking by then-President Barack Obama in 2011. Obama joked: “Say what you will about Mr. Trump, he certainly would bring some change to the White House. Let’s see what we’ve got up there.”

The screens then flashed to a White House featuring a massive neon sign reading “Trump White House Hotel Casino Golf Course” featuring golden columns and a massive chandelier blocking the front entrance.

Made years before Trump became a politician, that joke has proved prophetic. Trump has leaned on his construction background to make over the White House in unprecedented ways during his second term.

Those remodeling efforts include paving over the lawn near the Rose Garden to install a patio reminiscent of his Mar-a-Lago club in Florida and affixing partisan plaques to portraits of all the presidents on a Walk of Fame along the Colonnade. He’s also adorned the Oval Office in copious amounts of gold decorations and demolished the East Wing to begin work on a massive ballroom.

Arriving back from a weekend at Mar-a-Lago on Sunday, Trump stopped to admire two new additions to the area around the Rose Garden, statues of Thomas Jefferson and Ben Franklin that were erected there while he was away.

“Unbelievable statues. Come and look at them,” Trump told a pack of reporters nearby.

When a 22-year-old Kurdish-Iranian woman was arrested by Iran’s “morality police” for not wearing her head scarf in the manner required by the regime, human rights advocates were right to fear the worst. The Iranian government later claimed Mahsa (Zhina) Amini suffered a fatal heart attack, but witnesses alleged she was beaten unconscious after her detainment and later died — a state-sanctioned murder that would give rise to youth-led protests in the streets of Tehran.

The September 2022 “Woman, Life, Freedom” uprising against the Iranian government was short-lived, leading to the deaths of hundreds of protesters and the arrest of thousands more, followed by executions of some 1,400 detainees, according to Iran Human Rights. Additional uprisings against Iran’s so-called “Supreme Leader” Ayatollah Ali Khamenei spanned the Green Movement of 2009, the Bloody November protest of 2019 and the gruesome events of this past January, in which some human rights groups estimate more than 30,000 Iranians were killed.

“There were body bags, but the regime could not even bury them fast enough,” said Hamid Kashani, an Iranian-American architect who has lived in the Twin Cities since 1973. “It pushed Iranians over the edge with this regime and how far they can go butchering their own people. At this point, any outside help appears welcome to most of us.”

Still, even Kashani — a founding member of the Minnesota Committee in Support of a Democratic Iran — holds mixed feelings toward the Trump administration’s joint decision with Israel to bomb Iran. Khamenei was killed by a targeted Israeli missile strike in Tehran on Saturday, ending a 36-year rule that Iranian-Americans have described as a reign of terror.

Will Iran be any different?

Even those who celebrate his death recognize that elsewhere in the world, American efforts to topple autocratic regimes and hand-pick their successors have arguably set democracy backwards by creating ripe conditions for new authoritarians to assume power, notably Iranian-aligned leadership in Iraq and the Taliban in Afghanistan.

Will Iran be any different?

“It’s a million dollar question,” said Kashani, who lives in the western suburbs outside Minneapolis.

“We’re looking on with great hesitation and worry for the country and its people,” he said. “We all support getting rid of this barbaric leader, and hope for better days to come. The only concern is the ultimate outcome. Will we achieve the freedom and democracy that this whole thing is about, or will we replace one dictator with another?”

Regime change

Parham Alaei, a professor of medical physics at the University of Minnesota, shares the same mixed emotions.

“It is crucial to note that the people of Iran do not need, nor do they want, direct outside intervention; they are fighting against the regime on their own,” wrote Alaei, in a December 2022 opinion piece for the Pioneer Press regarding the “Woman, Life, Freedom” movement.

Fast forward three years, and “direct outside intervention” has suddenly shaken Iran’s repressive government, killed its Supreme Leader and raised a host of new questions. The loss of life on the ground gives him pause.

“I didn’t want the war to start, but now that it’s started … the best outcome of the war would be to have a regime change,” said Alaei on Monday.

He doubts the U.S. will enter Iran with ground troops, given that the country of 93 million people is the size of Afghanistan and Iraq combined. Polling shows the attacks on Iran have proven unpopular so far with the American people, who are unsure about the Trump administration’s goals.

The government and the people

Do Khamenei’s death and U.S. and Israeli missile strikes open the door to new power structures that could help the Iranian people, or will they lead to fresh crackdowns under an equally oppressive successor?

“It may weaken the regime such that the next time people rise up as they did in January, the regime won’t have the full force of manpower and equipment to massacre the people,” said Alaei, who is praying for the former over the latter. “The best outcome would be when this war ends, people would be able to topple the government, we’d have a provisional government set in place, and people could choose their government.”

“The problem with Iraq and Afghanistan was the U.S. appointed their leader for them,” he added. “That was a ‘nation-building’ scheme.”

In the U.S., Kashani hopes that everyday Americans will come to understand that the war is with the Iranian government, and not with the people of Iran, many but not all of whom have longed for Khamenei’s overthrow.

“There is a clear distinction between Iranian people and the Islamic Republic of Iran,” Kashani said. “The government and the people are totally different sides of the table.”

Related Articles

FACT FOCUS: Misrepresented images spread after US and Israel strike Iran

Trump pushes back on mounting criticism about his Iran war battle plan as conflict spreads

Gunman who opened fire on crowded Texas bar was not on FBI radar before attack, authorities say

Iranian drones buzz across the Persian Gulf after their pivotal use by Russia in Ukraine

Melania Trump presides at UN Security Council meeting on children in conflict as US attacks Iran