A St. Paul man who killed his puppy with a hammer has been put on probation for three years.

Tyler John Van Lannen (Courtesy of the Ramsey County Sheriff’s Office)

Tyler John Van Lannen, 30, lived at a New Brighton apartment building with his then-wife and their puppy at the time of the June 2024 killing, telling police after his arrest that he repeatedly struck the 6-month-old soft-coated Wheaten Terrier in the head because it kept barking.

Van Lannen was accepted into Ramsey County Mental Health Treatment Court on Dec. 17 and pleaded guilty to felony animal cruelty the same day. His plea came 10 days after he was arrested in Mendota Heights on suspicion of DWI.

He has two prior DWI convictions, both out of Ramsey County stemming from incidents about four months apart in 2021.

On Monday, Ramsey County District Judge Timothy Carey followed a plea agreement Van Lannen reached with the prosecution and stayed a one-year prison sentence for three years.

The sentence includes a stay of imposition, which means the conviction will become a misdemeanor if he successfully completes the conditions of his probation. Conditions include complying with all expectations of mental health treatment court, and random testing for alcohol and controlled substance use.

Bludgeoned dog found in trash bag

According to the criminal complaint, New Brighton police responded to an apartment building in the 2200 block of Palmer Drive around 3 p.m. June 23, 2024, on a report that a man had been verbally aggressive with his wife and had killed their puppy.

Officers saw a man matching the description walking from the building and carrying a large garbage bag. As officers drove toward him, he ran toward a dumpster.

As they approached, he said, “He wouldn’t stop barking, the dog,” the complaint read. He said he had killed the dog and that it was in the bag. Inside the bag was a curled-up, dead dog that appeared to have been bludgeoned. The man, Van Lannen, was arrested.

Back outside the apartment, officers met with Van Lannen’s wife. She said she’d been away from the apartment and received a call from him complaining about their puppy’s behavior. She said he then added, “So I killed it.”

She said that she came home and they argued, and that he left with the puppy in the garbage bag.

In an interview, Van Lannen told police they had been having problems with the puppy soiling the apartment. He said that on that day, he lost his patience, as the dog would not stop barking, and hit it on the head with a hammer about six times.

Van Lannen’s wife gave officers consent to search their apartment. She gave them a hammer, saying it was the only one they have; it was clean. In the living room was a pool of blood, along with excrement. The living-room floor had a divot that matched the head of a hammer.

About a month before the killing, the complaint said, Van Lannen’s wife reported to police that he was threatening her through texts. She gave police screenshots of aggressive and threatening texts from him.

‘Ready to get back up on my feet’

Related Articles

Minnesota sues to block Trump administration’s withholding of Medicaid funds

‘Heart sank’: Mom speaks at sentencing of Woodbury day-care worker who broke 9-month-old’s leg

Jury awards $17M to family of St. Paul woman killed by boyfriend, who was found not guilty by reason of mental illness

St. Paul: Ex-gas station employee gets 3-year prison term for shooting 2 men during fight outside store

Minneapolis man gets 40-year prison sentence for trafficking, sexually assaulting teen and woman at Mahtomedi apartment

Van Lannen appeared for sentencing in Ramsey County Mental Health Treatment Court via Zoom from an inpatient treatment center.

He chose not to address the court before hearing his sentence from Carey, who asked how he is doing.

“I’ve really gotten back into my faith. That’s my No. 1 thing,” he replied. “But I’m also ready to get back up on my feet, get better. I didn’t like being homeless and just being drunk.”

Court records show Van Lannen and his wife finalized a divorce two months after the puppy’s killing and that he later moved to St. Louis Park and then to a St. Paul homeless shelter.

He is due back in mental health treatment Court on March 16 for a progress check-in and Dakota County District Court on gross misdemeanor DWI charges April 28.

After news broke of Kyle Anderson’s impending return to the Timberwolves nearly two years after his free agency departure, teammates got on the horn. Rudy Gobert, Mike Conley and Anthony Edwards were all on the phone.

The center of the conversation: It was time to finish what they started.

Memphis Grizzlies forward Kyle Anderson reacts in the second half of an NBA basketball game against the Utah Jazz, Friday, Feb. 20, 2026, in Memphis, Tenn. (AP Photo/Brandon Dill)

All four, and a few others on the current roster, were a part of one of the two greatest teams in Timberwolves history, which reached the first of two consecutive Western Conference Finals in 2024.

“It’s definitely exciting,” Anderson said.

Anderson has been welcomed with open arms by those in the building who know him best. He developed close bonds with many teammates in his first stint in Minnesota. He vacationed with his then former teammates during the 2025 all-star break in Mexico. He hangs out with Jaden McDaniels and Naz Reid in the summertime.

Gobert, with whom Anderson had a public, in-game spat in the regular season finale of the 2022-23 campaign, became a close friend and dinner buddy the following year.

“These are my guys,” Anderson said.

And this is his coach.

This is Anderson’s 12th NBA season. He has played for six teams in that span, including some of the NBA’s most legendary bench bosses — Gregg Popovich, Erik Spoelstra, Steve Kerr. Yet Anderson said Timberwolves coach Chris Finch is the one who has most understood his game and skillset.

As a whole, Minnesota values the versatile forward.

“He’s a big part of what we do,” Gobert said. “He’s going to help us on and off the court. I think he’s a smart player, he’s a tough player, he’s an unselfish player, and also he’s someone who is a winner.”

That type of belief matters for a player.

“I’ve seen that first-hand. Just playing for a few teams where I feel like they didn’t see it, it sucks,” Anderson said. “I was with a lot of young guys in Utah and in Memphis, and they’re like, ‘Oh, I could be in another situation.’ I’m like, ‘The grass ain’t always greener.’ So, wherever you’re loved, you’ve got to make the most out of it.”

That’s what he intends to do with this opportunity. On the surface, Anderson figures to slot into the end of Minnesota’s rotation with minutes as either the team’s eighth or ninth man. But he’s making no such presumptions, nor demands, regarding his role.

“I’m willing to come in and do whatever,” he said. “Whether it’s not play at all, play a little bit, if I play a lot — whatever it is, I just want to contribute the best I can and I’ll go from there.”

Make no mistake, the 32-year-old forward remains confident in his game. While opportunities to play were sporadic over the past two seasons, largely due to circumstance — he spent much of this season on a Utah team prioritizing lottery balls over victories — Anderson still feels he’s “in my prime, ready to go.”

But he’s clearly making an early effort not to step on toes. While many of the faces remain the same, times have changed. Anderson was a vocal leader for two years in Minnesota, but this is a different locker room. He hasn’t been a part of the last year and a half.

“They don’t want to hear it,” he said with a laugh. “(They’d be like) ‘You haven’t been here all year. Shut up.’ When I can pitch in, I’ll do my part, but obviously the dynamic is a little different.”

He knows Minnesota reached the West Finals again last year without his assistance, and is in a position to do something similar this spring. His only goal is to aid in those efforts in any possible way.

“I think these guys are doing a great job. Like, I don’t think I’m coming in to save the day or do too much,” Anderson said. “However I can contribute and however me and Finchy see fit when we sit in his office, then that’s how it would go. But I’m not coming in expecting to play 30 minutes and taking all the ball handling responsibilities right away to save the day.

“However I see I can help, that’s how I’m gonna do it.”

Related Articles

Timberwolves make Kyle Anderson signing official. Here’s his new jersey number

Timberwolves top Nuggets for third straight win

Can Kyle Anderson be the antidote for what ails these Timberwolves?

Timberwolves grit out win at Clippers

Timberwolves edge Trail Blazers in Portland

By PHILIP MARCELO

NEW YORK (AP) — A federal judge has blocked President Donald Trump’s administration’s efforts to halt New York’s first-in-the-nation congestion fee meant to reduce traffic and pump revenue into the region’s aging transit system.

Related Articles

Ethics panel opens investigation of Rep. Nancy Mace over housing costs

Trump threatens to cut off trade with Spain after it disallowed US use of joint bases in Iran war

Iran war taxes US diplomatic work and leaves Americans in the Mideast in limbo

After abandoning law firm executive orders, Trump administration reverses course and pursues fight

Testy exchanges over immigration cases highlight growing confrontations between judges and DOJ

U.S. District Judge Lewis Liman on Tuesday ruled that the U.S. Department of Transportation lacked the authority to unilaterally rescind approval of the $9 toll, which former Democratic President Joe Biden initially green-lit.

Instead, he sided with the Metropolitan Transportation Authority, which had argued that the department’s reversal was “unlawful” because the agency had not adequately explained its reasoning.

“The Secretary’s actions were arbitrary and capricious, an abuse of discretion, and not in accordance with law,” Liman wrote in his 149-page ruling, referring to Trump’s Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy.

The judge noted that New York’s legislature passed the toll, which its governor signed into law and received the necessary federal approvals before launching.

“The democratic process worked,” Liman wrote, even as he left the door open for future attempts by Trump and other opponents to kill the program, which took effect on Jan. 5, 2025.

Gov. Kathy Hochul said the decision vindicates a “once-in-a-lifetime success story” that’s “yielded huge benefits” in its first year of operation, including reducing gridlock and unlocking critical funding for mass transit.

“The judge’s decision is clear: Donald Trump’s unlawful attempts to trample on the self-governance of his home state have failed spectacularly,” the Democrat said in a statement. “Congestion pricing is legal, it works, and it is here to stay.”

The U.S. DOT said it’s reviewing its legal options, including appealing.

“Once again, working-class Americans are being sidelined under Governor Kathy Hochul’s policies, which impose a massive tax on every New Yorker,” the agency said in a statement.

New York’s congestion toll is imposed on most vehicles driving into Manhattan south of Central Park.

The toll varies depending on vehicle type and time of day, and is added to tolls drivers already pay to cross bridges and tunnels into Manhattan, but generally costs about $9.

Congestion pricing schemes aimed at reducing traffic pollution and encouraging public transit use have long existed in other global cities, including London, Stockholm, Milan and Singapore, but not in the U.S.

But Trump, whose namesake Trump Tower and other properties are within the congestion zone, has strongly opposed the idea. During his presidential campaign, he vowed to kill New York’s plan as soon as he took office.

Then last February, Duffy rescinded the toll’s federal approval, calling the fee “a slap in the face to working-class Americans and small business owners.” He threatened to withhold federal funding for projects in New York if the toll weren’t discontinued.

But Liman temporarily blocked the administration from following through on those threats until he issued a final decision. The Manhattan judge previously dismissed a series of lawsuits brought by local opponents, including New Jersey’s governor, unionized teachers in New York City, a trucking industry group and local suburban leaders.

Hochul had been a vocal supporter of the toll but paused its planned rollout in 2024, a move widely seen as an attempt to help suburban Democrats in congressional races where the toll was divisive. She then reinstated the fee after the election, but lowered it from $15 to $9.

As the program marked its first anniversary in January, Hochul, who is up for reelection, joined the MTA in touting the toll’s benefits.

According to a recent MTA report, the toll has led to some 27 million fewer vehicles coming into the heart of Manhattan, resulting in 22% less air pollution and 23% faster commute times for those opting to drive and pay the fee.

The toll has also generated more than $550 million in revenue for the region’s creaky and cash-strapped transit system — exceeding projections, the MTA has said.

Sales tax revenues, office leases and foot traffic in the congestion zone have all increased since the toll took effect, disproving concerns it would hurt the local economy, according to the agency.

“Traffic is down, business is up, and we’re making crucial investments in a transit system that moves millions of people a day,” Janno Lieber, the MTA’s CEO, said Tuesday. “New York is winning.”

Follow Philip Marcelo at https://x.com/philmarcelo

By MATT O’BRIEN, AP Technology Writer

Anthropic’s moral stand on U.S. military use of artificial intelligence is reshaping the competition between leading AI companies but also exposing a growing awareness that maybe chatbots just aren’t capable enough for acts of war.

Anthropic’s chatbot Claude, for the first time, outpaced rival ChatGPT in phone app downloads in the United States this week, a signal of growing interest from consumers siding with Anthropic in its standoff with the Pentagon, according to market research firm Sensor Tower.

The Trump administration on Friday ordered government agencies to stop using Claude and designated it a supply chain risk after Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei refused to bend his company’s ethical safeguards preventing the technology from being applied to autonomous weapons and domestic mass surveillance. Anthropic has said it will challenge the Pentagon in court once it receives formal notice of the penalties.

And while many military and human rights experts have applauded Amodei for standing up for ethical principles, some are also frustrated by years of AI industry marketing that persuaded the government to apply the technology to high-stakes tasks.

“He caused this mess,” said Missy Cummings, a former Navy fighter pilot who now directs the robotics and automation center at George Mason University. “They were the No. 1 company to push ridiculous hype over the capabilities of these technologies. And now, all of a sudden, they want to be for real. They want to tell people, ‘Oh, wait a minute. We really shouldn’t be using these technologies in weapons.’”

FILE – Dario Amodei, CEO and co-founder of Anthropic, attends the annual meeting of the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland, Jan. 23, 2025. (AP Photo/Markus Schreiber, File)

Anthropic didn’t immediately respond to a request for comment. The Defense Department declined to comment on whether it is still using Claude, including in the Iran war, citing operational security.

Cummings published a paper at a top AI conference in December arguing that government agencies should prohibit the use of generative AI “to control, direct, guide or govern any weapon.” Not because AI is so smart that it could go rogue, but because the large language models behind chatbots like Claude make too many mistakes — called hallucinations or confabulations — and are “inherently unreliable and not appropriate in environments that could result in the loss of life.”

“You’re going to kill noncombatants,” Cummings said in an interview Tuesday with The Associated Press. “You’re going to kill your own troops. I’m not clear whether the military truly understands the limitations.”

Amodei sought to emphasize those limitations in defending Anthropic’s ethical stance last week, arguing that “frontier AI systems are simply not reliable enough to power fully autonomous weapons. We will not knowingly provide a product that puts America’s warfighters and civilians at risk.”

Anthropic, until recently, was the only one of its peers to have approval for use in classified military systems, where it has partnered with data analysis company Palantir and other defense contractors. President Donald Trump said Friday, around the same time he was approving Saturday’s military strikes on Iran, that the Pentagon would have six months to phase out Anthropic’s military applications.

Cummings, a former Palantir adviser, said it’s possible that Claude has already been used in military strike planning.

“I just fundamentally hope that there were humans in the loop,” she said. “A human has to babysit these technologies very closely. You can use them to do these things, but you need to verify, verify, verify.”

She said that’s a contrast to the messaging from AI companies that have suggested that their technology is evolving to the point where it is “almost sentient.”

“If there’s culpability here, I’d say half is Anthropic’s for driving the hype and half is the Department of War’s fault for firing all the people that would have otherwise advised them against stupid uses of technology,” Cummings said.

One social media commentator this week described Anthropic’s government problems as a “Hype Tax” — a message that was reposted by President Donald Trump’s top AI adviser, David Sacks, a frequent critic of the company.

And while it has caused legal hassles that could jeopardize Anthropic’s business partnerships with other military contractors, it has also bolstered its reputation as a safety-minded AI developer.

“It’s applaudable that a company stood up to the government in order to maintain what it felt were its ethics and were its business choices, even in the face of these potentially crippling policy responses,” said Jennifer Huddleston, a senior fellow at the libertarian-leaning Cato Institute.

Consumers have already spoken, leading to a surge of Claude downloads that made it the most popular iPhone app starting on Saturday and for all phone systems in the U.S. on Monday, according to Sensor Tower. That’s come at the expense of OpenAI’s ChatGPT, which saw its consumer reputation damaged when it announced a Friday deal with the Pentagon to effectively replace Anthropic with ChatGPT in classified environments.

In the Apple store, the number of 1-star reviews — the worst rating — of ChatGPT grew by 775% on Saturday and continued to grow early this week, forcing OpenAI to do damage control.

“We shouldn’t have rushed to get this out on Friday,” OpenAI CEO Sam Altman said in a social media post Monday. “The issues are super complex, and demand clear communication. We were genuinely trying to de-escalate things and avoid a much worse outcome, but I think it just looked opportunistic and sloppy.”

Altman was planning to gather employees for an “all-hands” meeting on Tuesday to discuss next steps.

“There are many things the technology just isn’t ready for, and many areas we don’t yet understand the tradeoffs required for safety,” Altman said. “We will work through these, slowly, with the (Pentagon), with technical safeguards and other methods.”