Source: Vikings agree to terms with tight end Johnny Mundt

posted in: News | 0

With star tight end T.J. Hockenson recovering from a torn anterior cruciate ligament and medial collateral ligament, the Vikings are fortifying the rest of the position group.

In advance of free agency next week, the Vikings agree to terms with tight end Johnny Mundt on Friday afternoon, a source confirmed to the Pioneer Press. He was set to become an unrestricted free agent.

The move isn’t surprising given how glowingly head coach Kevin O’Connell has talked about Mundt in the past. They have a relationship dating back to their shared time together with the Los Angeles Rams.

After finishing last season with 17 catches for a career-high 172 yards, Mundt figures to play an even bigger role next season, especially with Hockenson not expected to be ready for the season opener.

For his career, Mundt has 46 catches for 405 yards and 2 touchdowns across 81 games. Not bad for somebody who did not get selected in the 2017 NFL Draft.

Related Articles

Minnesota Vikings |


Vikings news from NFL Combine: On the return of Brian Flores, the arrival Josh McCown, and more

Minnesota Vikings |


If the Vikings make Michael Penix Jr. their next quarterback, he will have earned it

Minnesota Vikings |


As the Vikings eye their next quarterback, Bo Nix points to his experience

Minnesota Vikings |


J.J. McCarthy seems to align with what Vikings want in their next quarterback

Minnesota Vikings |


Source: Vikings release running back Alexander Mattison ahead of free agency

Historian T.J. Malaskee headlines Washington County Historical Society annual meeting

posted in: Politics | 0

T.J. Malaskee, a Minnesota historian of 19th century agriculture, will be the featured speaker at the Washington County Historical Society annual meeting on March 21.

Malaskee will discuss the Order of the Patrons of Husbandry, the national farming organization better known as the Grange, which was founded in 1867.

T.J. Malaskee (Courtesy of the Washington County Historical Society)

Malaskee, the executive director of the Maplewood Area Historical Society, is a past president of the Minnesota Grange.

The meeting will take place at the Stillwater Event Center, 1910 S. Greeley St., Stillwater, beginning with a 5:30 p.m. social hour. A sit-down dinner, catered by Scheel’s Catering, will begin at 6:30 p.m.; a short meeting will be at 7:30 p.m.

Cost is $25 for society members and $30 for nonmembers.

Reservations are required; call 651-439-2298 or go to wchsmn.org online.

Related Articles

Things to Do |


Township elections are usually ho-hum affairs. Not this month in Washington County.

Things to Do |


Lake Elmo City Council signs off on plans for new elementary school

Things to Do |


Charges: Texas bandits swipe nearly 19K worth of graphing calculators from eight east-metro Target stores

Things to Do |


Woodbury: Former state legislators plan to launch online news site

Things to Do |


Stillwater says it shut down a city well more than a year ago after detecting PFAS contamination

‘Damsel’ review: Millie Bobby Brown stars in dark fantasy lacking a pulse

posted in: News | 0

“Damsel” is very proud of the way it subverts our expectations of a fairy tale.

“There are many stories of chivalry, where the heroic knight saves the damsel in distress,” star Millie Bobby Brown declares in the opening narration of the fantasy film, hitting Netflix this week. “This is NOT one of them.”

That is true, for “Damsel” is a tale in which the princess must save herself.

It also is a movie that asks too much of Brown, the talented young actress we’ve watched grow up in Netflix’s popular science-fiction-meets-horror series “Stranger Things” and who’s delighted in two previous Netflix movies, 2020’s “Enola Holmes” and its likewise enjoyable 2022 sequel, “Enola Holmes 2.”

She has had a lot of on-screen help carrying the dramatic weight of those projects. In Damsel,” however, despite notable cast mates in Angela Bassett and Robin Wright, Brown is asked to haul almost all of it.

Related Articles


Movie Review: ‘Kung Fu Panda 4’ is a sweet, fun and well executed passing of the torch


Best cameo? Best hat? Ahead of the Oscars, AP hands out its own awards


‘The Gentlemen’ review: Guy Ritchie’s small-screen take fun but forgettable


‘Spaceman’ review: Sandler stars in so-so film for grown-ups about inner journey


What to watch: ‘Shogun’ a worthy remake of classic series

Perhaps she could, were the screenplay by Dan Mazeau (“Fast X”) much stronger and the direction of Juan Carlos Fresnadillo (“28 Weeks Later)” better than acceptable.

With these key components at the levels they are, “Damsel” is a mildly entertaining time-passer, one likely to appeal to a younger demographic — an audience perhaps ready to graduate from basic princess tales to something a little darker and at least a little more interesting.

Brown’s Elodie is no princess when we meet her but instead a simple girl from a simple family living in a place where people are starving and freezing, she and her sister, Floria (Brooke Carter), gathering what they can for kindling. When a letter arrives from Queen Isabelle (Wright), proposing Elodie be wed to her son, Prince Henry (Nick Robinson, “Love, Simon”), Elodie’s father, Lord Bayford (Ray Winstone, who’s also on Netflix this week in the series “The Gentlemen”), and stepmother, Lady Bayford (Bassett), are excited about the promised bounty that will be given to them in exchange.

Although Elodie initially feels this is not reason enough to marry, she dutifully accepts her fate.

“The union will save us,” she allows. “I’ve made my peace with it — my happiness is a small price to pay for the future of my people.”

Upon the family’s arrival in the queen’s opulent realm, however, there are signs all is not what it seems. (Hint: That probably has something to do with the fire-breathing dragon we encounter in the film’s prologue.) While the viewer is beaten over the head with reasons to fear for Elodie, she mostly brushes off any concerns and marries the prince, who, to be fair, seems like an OK chap.

Millie Bobby Brown and Nick Robinson appear in a scene from “Damsel.” (Courtesy of Netflix)

Without giving away further details, know that our heroine will come face to face with the dragon (voiced by the unmistakable Shohreh Aghdashloo) — who has reason to be furious with the royals — and must fight to survive the dragon’s hunt inside a cavernous maze. (That Elodie will find herself in such an environment is foreshadowed by the revelation she draws mazes as a hobby. Do Mazeau or Fresnadillo use Elodie’s gift for maze design in any kind of clever way as the adventure unfolds? No, not really. “Damsel” just isn’t that kind of movie.)

Elodie makes a couple of illuminating discoveries within the caverns, but it would help the film’s momentum if she encountered, say, a collection of communicative cave people — a few new characters to help carry things along. As it stands, it’s mainly a lot of Elodie, intermittently chatting with the vengeful dragon.

Millie Bobby Brown stars as Elodie in “Damsel.” (Courtesy of Netflix)

To say that “Damzel” moves in fits and starts may be too kind.

Brown, whose movie credits also include MonsterVerse entries “Godzilla: King of the Monsters” (2019) and sequel “Godzilla vs. Kong” (2021) and is also counted among this movie’s executive producers, is not the problem here, giving a performance that crosses Ts and dots Is. She simply isn’t so good as to be the solution, either.

Again, no one else gets much screen time, but it is fun to see Wright as an evil queen given that many first knew her as Princess Buttercup in 1987’s “The Princess Bride.” She brings some of her fierce “House of Cards”/Claire Underwood energy to “Damsel,” but that doesn’t move the needle.

Robin Wright portrays Queen Isabelle in “Damsel.” (Courtesy of Netflix)

Considering some of its tasty ingredients, you wait for “Damsel” to find a way to lift itself out of its below-average realm, like a dragon rising to rain fire on the poor souls below. Alas, though, that spark never comes.

‘Damsel’

Where: Netflix.

When: March 8.

Rated: PG-13 for sequences of strong creature violence, action, and bloody images.

Runtime: 1 hour, 49 minutes.

Stars (of four): 2.

Paul Offit looks back on COVID-19, misinformation, and how public health lost the public’s trust in new book

posted in: Politics | 0

Abraham Gutman | (TNS) The Philadelphia Inquirer

PHILADELPHIA — Trust in public health agencies declined during the COVID-19 pandemic, as misinformation about vaccines and the virus proliferated on social media. But did the public health agencies themselves also play a role in the decline of their credibility?

Paul Offit had a front-row seat to federal public health agencies’ pandemic response. A pediatrician and vaccine developer from the Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, Offit is a member of the FDA’s vaccine advisory committee, which played a critical role in reviewing COVID vaccine research and advising the FDA on vaccine safety.

In his new book, “Tell Me When It’s Over: An Insider’s Guide to Deciphering Covid Myths and Navigating Our Post-Pandemic World,” Offit chronicles the first years of the pandemic, explains the science of COVID, and traces the rise of anti-vaccine movement and misinformation. He also blames those charged with protecting the nation’s health of taking action against evidence — and in doing so undermining public trust.

He says public health agencies made mistakes in key moments, such as when the FDA fast tracked in 2020 the authorization of an antimalaria drug with risk of fatal heart side effects that didn’t work against COVID. At the time, President Donald Trump called the medication a “game changer” and promoted it as a COVID treatment. The FDA revoked the authorization a few months later.

“People lost faith in the FDA,” Offit said. “People saw that you could twist the FDA’s arm.”

The Inquirer spoke to Offit about his new book, and what steps public health agencies can take to reclaim the public’s trust.

Best of times, worst of times

The pandemic saw significant scientific advancement. Scientists were able to produce a safe and effective vaccine to protect against a new virus within a year — a feat that can take more than 10 years. Offit called the vaccine “the greatest” medical achievement in his lifetime.

At the same time, more people grew suspicious of vaccines, and their mistrust continued to grow through last fall, according to surveys by the Annenberg Public Policy Center at the University of Pennsylvania. In the center’s most recent survey, 71% agreed that vaccines approved in the U.S. are safe, down from 77% in April 2021.

The way public health agencies and elected officials communicated also contributed to the public’s loss of faith, Offit said.

He criticized the response to a July 4, 2021, celebration in Provincetown, Mass. After thousands of people attended the event, nearly 350 fully vaccinated men were among those who developed COVID. Only four of those vaccinated were hospitalized, and the rest developed mild or no symptoms.

Offit saw a success: the vaccines were working.

But the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention used the term “breakthrough infection” to describe the incident, a phrasing choice that Offit said implied failure to offer protection.

Another mixed message came in August 2021: President Joe Biden promoted booster shots for American adults even though boosters had not been approved by the FDA yet.

A month later, the FDA advisory committee overwhelmingly voted against the recommendation to offer boosters to people under age 65, because there wasn’t enough evidence at the time that an extra dose would improve protection to people of all ages.

The conflicting messages added to public distrust, Offit said.

The FDA began expanding the eligibility for boosters in Nov. 2021, and currently recommends that everyone over a ge 6 months receive an extra shoot.

Neither the FDA nor the CDC responded to request for comment about Offit’s criticism. A spokesperson for the FDA shared a statement saying the agency stands by the safety and effectiveness of the COVID vaccines.

Admitting mistakes and going on offense

Rebuilding trust in public health agencies won’t be easy, Offit said. But he has some ideas for how to move forward.

Science and knowledge are always evolving, which means the best advice experts can offer may change. Public health agencies shouldn’t shy away from that fact and should do more to explain the scientific process, Offit said.

“You have to trust the American public to at least tell them the truth,” he said. “It’s OK to make your best guess and get it wrong, but say that.”

Offit also wants to see public health agencies more aggressively responding to anti-vaccination claims and other misinformation. When misinformation is spread, public health agencies should spend resources on campaigns disputing the claims with science.

People who advocate against vaccines “harm children,” he said, pointing to the recent measles outbreaks in the U.S, and he wants public health agencies to portray them as such.

“Hammer back,” Offit said.

©2024 The Philadelphia Inquirer, LLC. Visit at inquirer.com. Distributed by Tribune Content Agency, LLC.