A faster spinning Earth may cause timekeepers to subtract a second from world clocks

posted in: News | 0

By SETH BORENSTEIN (AP Science Writer)

Earth’s changing spin is threatening to toy with our sense of time, clocks and computerized society in an unprecedented way — but only for a second.

For the first time in history, world timekeepers may have to consider subtracting a second from our clocks in a few years because the planet is rotating a tad faster than it used to. Clocks may have to skip a second — called a “negative leap second” — around 2029, a study in the journal Nature said Wednesday.

“This is an unprecedented situation and a big deal,” said study lead author Duncan Agnew, a geophysicist at the Scripps Institution of Oceanography at the University of California, San Diego. “It’s not a huge change in the Earth’s rotation that’s going to lead to some catastrophe or anything, but it is something notable. It’s yet another indication that we’re in a very unusual time.”

Ice melting at both of Earth’s poles has been counteracting the planet’s burst of speed and is likely to have delayed this global second of reckoning by about three years, Agnew said.

“We are headed toward a negative leap second,” said Dennis McCarthy, retired director of time for the U.S. Naval Observatory who wasn’t part of the study. “It’s a matter of when.”

It’s a complicated situation that involves, physics, global power politics, climate change, technology and two types of time.

Earth takes about 24 hours to rotate, but the key word is about.

For thousands of years, the Earth has been generally slowing down, with the rate varying from time to time, said Agnew and Judah Levine, a physicist for the time and frequency division of the National Institute of Standards and Technology.

The slowing is mostly caused by the effect of tides, which are caused by the pull of the moon, McCarthy said.

This didn’t matter until atomic clocks were adopted as the official time standard more than 55 years ago. Those didn’t slow.

That established two versions of time — astronomical and atomic — and they didn’t match. Astronomical time fell behind atomic time by 2.5 milliseconds every day. That meant the atomic clock would say it’s midnight and to Earth it was midnight a fraction of a second later, Agnew said.

Those daily fractions of seconds added up to whole seconds every few years. Starting in 1972, international timekeepers decided to add a “leap second” in June or December for astronomical time to catch up to the atomic time, called Coordinated Universal Time or UTC. Instead of 11:59 and 59 seconds turning to midnight, there would be another second at 11:59 and 60 seconds. A negative leap second would go from 11:59 and 58 seconds directly to midnight, skipping 11:59:59.

Between 1972 and 2016, 27 separate leap seconds were added as Earth slowed. But the rate of slowing was tapering off.

“In 2016 or 2017 or maybe 2018, the slowdown rate had slowed down to the point that the Earth was actually speeding up,” Levine said.

Earth’s speeding up because its hot liquid core — “a large ball of molten fluid” — acts in unpredictable ways, with eddies and flows that vary, Agnew said.

Agnew said the core has been triggering a speedup for about 50 years, but rapid melting of ice at the poles since 1990 masked that effect. Melting ice shifts Earth’s mass from the poles to the bulging center, which slows the rotation much like a spinning ice skater slows when extending their arms out to their sides, he said.

Without the effect of melting ice, Earth would need that negative leap second in 2026 instead of 2029, Agnew calculated.

For decades, astronomers had been keeping universal and astronomical time together with those handy little leap seconds. But computer system operators said those additions aren’t easy for all the precise technology the world now relies on. In 2012, some computer systems mishandled the leap second, causing problems for Reddit, Linux, Qantas Airlines and others, experts said.

“What is the need for this adjustment in time when it causes so many problems?” McCarthy said.

But Russia’s satellite system relies on astronomical time, so eliminating leap seconds would cause them problems, Agnew and McCarthy said. Astronomers and others wanted to keep the system that would add a leap second whenever the difference between atomic and astronomical time neared a second.

In 2022, the world’s timekeepers decided that starting in the 2030s they’d change the standards for inserting or deleting a leap second, making it much less likely.

Tech companies such as Google and Amazon unilaterally instituted their own solutions to the leap second issue by gradually adding fractions of a second over a full day, Levine said.

“The fights are so serious because the stakes are so small,” Levine said.

Then add in the “weird” effect of subtracting, not adding a leap second, Agnew said. It’s likely to be tougher to skip a second because software programs are designed to add, not subtract time, McCarthy said.

McCarthy said the trend toward needing a negative leap second is clear, but he thinks it’s more to do with the Earth becoming more round from geologic shifts from the end of the last ice age.

Three other outside scientists said Agnew’s study makes sense, calling his evidence compelling.

But Levine doesn’t think a negative leap second will really be needed. He said the overall slowing trend from tides has been around for centuries and continues, but the shorter trends in Earth’s core come and go.

“This is not a process where the past is a good prediction of the future,” Levine said. “Anyone who makes a long-term prediction on the future is on very, very shaky ground.”

___

Read more of AP’s climate coverage at http://www.apnews.com/climate-and-environment

___

Follow Seth Borenstein on X at @borenbears

___

The Associated Press’ climate and environmental coverage receives financial support from multiple private foundations. AP is solely responsible for all content. Find AP’s standards for working with philanthropies, a list of supporters and funded coverage areas at AP.org.

Bigos Management reopens former downtown St. Paul YMCA to 1,500 tenants as ‘Lowertown Skyrec’

posted in: News | 0

A multi-story YMCA opened just off downtown St. Paul’s Galtier Plaza in the mid-1980s, drawing scores of patrons to its half-Olympic size swimming pool and skyway-level entrances. After serving two generations of visitors, the fitness and foot traffic came to a halt in 2020, when the pandemic temporarily shuttered gyms.

The downtown Y never reopened, a victim to COVID-19, decreased patronage in the era of remote work and the nonprofit’s reshuffled priorities. Bigos Management, which acquired Galtier/Cray Plaza for roughly $5 million in 2019, has drawn up and revisited plans for repositioning the former office building that once housed the Cray supercomputer company at least twice throughout the pandemic. For now, the seven floors of commercial space sit quiet, the last office tenant having vacated the property last fall.

The exception is the former YMCA gym, which still draws members from the five residential Bigos properties downtown, four of which ring Mears Park.

Access to the recently-refurbished “Lowertown Skyrec” — Lowertownskyrec.com — is a free perk to tenants of the neighboring Galtier Towers Apartments, Mears Park Place, the Historic Lowertown Lofts, the newly-acquired Cosmopolitan Apartments and the Kellogg Square building a few blocks away.

“I’ve had numerous residents go, ‘I didn’t even know this was here,’” said Nicholas Geng, a facilities manager with Bigos Management. “They absolutely love it.”

‘Events return to Mears Park’

The dumbbells and weight machines have been cleared out, but the former YMCA’s swimming pool, walking track, two full basketball courts, five pickleball courts and men’s and women’s locker room saunas reopened on three levels last November as a private facility available exclusively to the 1,500 tenants of the downtown Bigos properties.

The YMCA’s former skyway footprint is gone, likely destined to become housing, but a hot tub, volleyball court, family activity rooms, foosball tables and a roomy crafts room/maker’s space now line the floors above.

“When he’s shooting his hoops, I can do my workout,” said Rey Row, a single-mother to 13-year-old Isaac, pointing to the elevated walking track overlooking the basketball courts on Tuesday afternoon. “We shoot hoops or go swimming or play foosball.”

The Lowertown Skyrec spans 50,000 square feet of activity space across its three floors. The space “sat vacant until we started renovations this summer, but we bought it in October 2021,” said Stephanie Simmons, a property manager with Bigos Management who used to live in the Galtier Towers. “I had a lot of hurt watching what we’ve gone through with COVID and the unrest, and it’s been great seeing things come back as events return to Mears Park.”

Bill Hanley, a longtime Lowertown resident, called the uptick in skyway-level foot traffic each morning long overdue and much appreciated.

“It’s spectacular,” he said. “Those of us who are not Bigos residents who are in adjoining buildings are lobbying for some inclusion.”

‘Ready for it not to be empty’

Simmons said after multiple revisions, Bigos Management is likely to move forward next year with converting the vacant Galtier Plaza into seven levels of housing adjoining the residential Sibley and Jackson Street high-rise towers of the Galtier Towers Apartments. Cray, the supercomputer company, served as the office building’s anchor tenant from 2009 until 2017, when it relocated to Bloomington.

Cray Plaza’s few remaining commercial tenants soon scattered, with the last of them — the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services’ Office of the Inspector General — moving out last September.

“We’re ready for it to not be empty,” Simmons said.

In late January, Bigos Management acquired the 258-unit Cosmopolitan Apartments in Lowertown from a Boston-based ownership group for $34 million, a relative bargain. According to Ramsey County property tax records, the eight-story building carries an estimated market value this year of $45 million.

The building, which is located at 250 Sixth St. and dates to 1915, last sold in 2008 for $24 million.

Related Articles

Local News |


Metal band Korn to hit St. Paul’s Xcel Energy Center on 30th anniversary tour

Local News |


St. Paul, Met Council seek developers for land around downtown Central Station

Local News |


St. Paul Saints’ new menu items for 2024 include gigantic hot dog, sundae

Local News |


Choo Choo Bob’s Train Store returning to St. Paul, with a new home in Union Depot

Local News |


Redesigning the State Capitol Mall in 10 ‘Bold Moves’

Settlement reached in lawsuit between Disney and Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis’ allies

posted in: Society | 0

By MIKE SCHNEIDER (Associated Press)

ORLANDO, Fla. (AP) — Allies of Gov. Ron DeSantis and Disney reached a settlement agreement Wednesday in a state court fight over how Walt Disney World is developed in the future following the takeover of the theme park resort’s government by the Florida governor.

In a meeting, the members of the board of the Central Florida Tourism Oversight District approved the settlement agreement, ending almost two years of litigation that was sparked by DeSantis’ takeover of the district from Disney supporters following the company’s opposition to Florida’s so-called “Don’t Say Gay” law.

The 2022 law bans classroom lessons on sexual orientation and gender identity in early grades and was championed by the Republican governor, who used Disney as a punching bag in speeches until he suspended his presidential campaign this year.

The district provides municipal services such as firefighting, planning and mosquito control, among other things, and was controlled by Disney supporters for most of its five decades.

Jeff Vahle, president of Walt Disney World Resort, said in a statement Wednesday that the company was pleased a settlement had been reached.

“This agreement opens a new chapter of constructive engagement with the new leadership of the district and serves the interests of all parties by enabling significant continued investment and the creation of thousands of direct and indirect jobs and economic opportunity in the state,” Vahle said.

As punishment for Disney’s opposition to the law, DeSantis took over the governing district through legislation passed by the Republican-controlled Florida Legislature and appointed a new board of supervisors. Disney sued DeSantis and his appointees, claiming the company’s free speech rights were violated for speaking out against the legislation. A federal judge dismissed that lawsuit in January.

Before control of the district changed hands from Disney allies to DeSantis appointees early last year, the Disney supporters on its board signed agreements with Disney shifting control over design and construction at Disney World to the company. The new DeSantis appointees claimed the “eleventh-hour deals” neutered their powers and the district sued the company in state court in Orlando to have the contracts voided.

Disney filed counterclaims that include asking the state court to declare the agreements valid and enforceable.

Under the terms of Wednesday’s settlement agreement, Disney lets stand a determination by the board of DeSantis-appointees that the comprehensive plan approved by the Disney supporters before the takeover are null and void. Disney also agrees that a development agreement and restrictive covenants passed before the takeover are also not valid, according to the settlement terms.

Instead, a comprehensive plan from 2020 will be used with the new board able to make changes to it, and the agreement suggests Disney and the new board will negotiate a new development agreement in the near future.

___

Follow Mike Schneider on X, formerly known as Twitter: @MikeSchneiderAP.

F.D. Flam: The U.S. needs a non-partisan 9/11 Commission for COVID

posted in: Society | 0

During the third week of March 2020, with little public debate and less warning, Americans were told to stay in their homes indefinitely as COVID cases climbed. There were only a few days between bland reassurances and lockdown orders — just enough time to go panic shopping for toilet paper.

The first pandemic year represents a crisis distinct from the period after vaccines became widely available. Congress should establish something like the 9/11 Commission — independent and bipartisan — to reexamine why our early response was so disruptive and yet so ineffective. A report issued in time for next year’s anniversary of the start of the pandemic might identify weaknesses in the country’s general ability to deal with the next crisis, whatever that entails.

Some eye-opening analyses covering that first year have recently appeared in “Lessons From the COVID War,” by a panel of scientists and policy experts, and “The Big Fail: What the Pandemic Revealed About Who America Protects and Who It Leaves Behind,” by journalists Joe Nocera and Bethany McLean. But an official bipartisan treatment would have a big impact on our polarized nation.

Such a commission should first address why our elected leaders and expert agencies didn’t warn the public sooner. There was strong evidence by early February 2020 that this disease had already spread far beyond Wuhan, China, that it could travel invisibly through mild cases, and that the oldest people were at highest risk.

Some fair warning could have helped people take voluntary measures to avoid infection and prepare for disruption. But for much of January and February we got false reassurance. Even when Nancy Messonnier of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention said on Feb. 25 that the virus might cause ” severe” disruption, CDC deputy director Anne Schuchat pushed back, saying “our efforts at containment have worked.” It wasn’t until mid-March that the White House declared COVID a national emergency.

The delays in issuing clear warnings were part of a perverse disregard for the effects of time in a crisis. When protective measures began mattered. So did the timing of lifting or changing those measures. People can better stick with sacrifices that have a specific duration and a realistic goal.

Waiting to issue warnings and directives until after the disease was widespread meant more deaths — and the need for more extreme measures to get the same level of mitigation. And it isn’t hindsight bias to say that extreme measures such as shutting schools, businesses and public events would have been less harmful if done for two or three weeks rather than months.

The scenes of people dying in hospital corridors in Italy made it seem necessary to take drastic measures in the U.S. to “flatten the curve” of infection, but there was no scientific case for trying to eradicate an already widespread virus by keeping extreme measures in place long term.

A COVID commission could also look at what government, employers and communities might have done to prevent deaths among essential workers and their families. While Americans saw limited improvements in paid sick leave policy, the situation called for more. Essential workers who were at risk or lived with people in fragile health should have been able to opt out of work — their jobs taken over temporarily by the many healthy, younger Americans who were unafraid and whose mental health might have improved with the chance to contribute rather than stay cooped up alone.

And a special investigation could also help puncture the thin excuse that U.S. leaders made bad decisions because of a lack of data on a novel virus. Even in those early days of 2020, we had enough information to act more rationally. By early April, there was already growing evidence that the virus was spreading primarily indoors through airborne transmission and there was very little risk outdoors.

Blunt closures of businesses, schools, beaches and parks threw that knowledge out the window — and they didn’t represent scientific consensus. Michael Osterholm, director of the Center for Infectious Disease Research and Policy in Minnesota, co-wrote a Washington Post op-ed published on March 21, 2020, warning that indefinite, sweeping lockdowns were not the best course of action for saving lives:

“The best alternative will probably entail letting those at low risk for serious disease continue to work, keep business and manufacturing operating, and ‘run’ society, while at the same time advising higher-risk individuals to protect themselves through physical distancing and ramping up our health-care capacity as aggressively as possible.”

A targeted strategy could have harnessed what scientists had discerned about who was at the most risk of dying and which kinds of work were riskiest.

Osterholm stood by this view when I spoke to him this month. (And to give credit where it’s due, he was the first to get me thinking about a 9/11 Commission for COVID.) He reminded me that he favored short-duration measures to slow the rate of spread and keep hospitals from being overwhelmed. And he was concerned that long-term lockdowns would increase the death toll among “essential workers,” many of whom had health conditions that put them at elevated risk, or lived in crowded housing with elderly relatives. His worries came true.

Lockdowns caused homes to become more crowded — with college students moving in with families, school-age kids at home and others spending much more time in their houses or apartments. Epidemiologists have confirmed that hours of household exposure caused many more cases than exposures of less than 30 minutes. Again, time matters.

A COVID commission should also measure the lasting impact of these early fumbles. After vaccines were introduced, the U.S. started to see many more deaths than other comparably wealthy countries. We had lower vaccine uptake in part because the public-health community had lost the people’s trust during that first year.

The justification for blunt, long-term restrictions was the assumption that more people would die as a result of more targeted measures. But that needs close examination — it’s also possible that those policies made the situation here much worse and deadlier than it had to be.

Lots of countries made mistakes as COVID spread around the world. The only way to learn from them is to give them a hard, nonpartisan look.

F.D. Flam is a Bloomberg Opinion columnist covering science. She is host of the “Follow the Science” podcast.

Related Articles

Opinion |


Letters: In Cobb case, was deadly force authorized?

Opinion |


Lisa Jarvis: Biden’s $12 billion for women’s health should be just a start

Opinion |


Adam Minter: March Madness as we know it faces extinction

Opinion |


Murphy, Sperling: How a California climate win could end up destroying rainforests — and what to do about it

Opinion |


David French: America’s most overlooked political divide is also its most revealing