The Twins have used six games against the Chicago White Sox this season to get better, if not well. With the chance for a series sweep on Thursday at Target Field, Minnesota couldn’t get much of anything going offensively in a wet 3-0 loss.

The game was played in an incessant rain that required the grounds crew to give the infield some extreme makeovers between innings before umpire crew chief Laz Diaz called for the tarp after seven innings. After about 40 minutes, it was called.

The Twins have been shut out three times this young season, twice by the White Sox, who improved to 6-19 on Thursday. They beat Minnesota 9-0 in Chicago on March 31.

Lenyn Sosa and Michael Vargas his solo home runs for the White Sox, and Joshua Palacios drew a bases-loaded walk to drive in Chicago’s other run.

White Sox rookie Shane Smith (1-1), making his fifth major league start, held the Twins scoreless for five innings, allowing four hits and a walk while fanning seven.

Chris Paddack (0-3) took the loss, allowing two runs on a solo home run by Sosa in the second inning and walking in another with two out in the fourth. He pitched five innings, allowing five hits and four walks. He struck out five.

Vargas started the sixth with a home run, his first of the season, against reliever Jorge Alcala.

The Twins put runners on first and second with no outs in the sixth inning against reliever Jordan Leasure. The right-hander walked Byron Buxton to start the inning, then gave up a sharp single to Brooks Lee, bringing Trevor Larnach to the plate.

Larnach quickly worked the count to 3-0 but wound up striking out. Next batter Carlos Correa also worked a quick 3-0 count against Leasure, but was called out looking on an outside fastball out of the zone for the second out. Ty France hit a broken-bat liner to second baseman Sosa to end the inning.

Chicago White Sox’s Miguel Vargas (20) rounds the bases after hitting a home run during the sixth inning of a baseball game against the Minnesota Twins, Thursday, April 24, 2025, in Minneapolis, Minn. (AP Photo/Ellen Schmidt)

By JONEL ALECCIA, Associated Press

The Agriculture Department will not require poultry companies to limit salmonella bacteria in their products, halting a Biden Administration effort to prevent food poisoning from contaminated meat.

The department on Thursday said it was withdrawing a rule proposed in August after three years of development. Officials with the USDA’s Food Safety and Inspection Service cited feedback from more than 7,000 public comments and said they would “evaluate whether it should update” current salmonella regulations.

The rule would have required poultry companies to keep levels of salmonella bacteria under a certain threshold and test for the presence of six strains most associated with illness, including three found in turkey and three in chicken. If the levels exceeded the standard or any of those strains were found, the poultry couldn’t be sold and would be subject to recall, the proposal had said.

The plan aimed to reduce an estimated 125,000 salmonella infections from chicken and 43,000 from turkey each year, according to USDA. Overall, salmonella causes 1.35 million infections a year, most through food, and about 420 deaths, according to the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

The withdrawal drew praise from the National Chicken Council, an industry trade group, which said the proposed rule was legally unsound, misinterpreted science, would have increased costs and create more food waste, all “with no meaningful impact on public health.”

“We remain committed to further reducing salmonella and fully support food safety regulations and policies that are based on sound science,” said Ashley Peterson, the group’s senior vice president of science and regulatory affairs.

But the move drew swift criticism from food safety advocates, including Sandra Eskin, a former USDA official who helped draft the plan.

The withdrawal “sends the clear message that the Make America Healthy Again initiative does not care about the thousands of people who get sick from preventable foodborne salmonella infections linked to poultry,” Eskin said in a statement.

The proposed rule had been regarded as a food safety victory similar to a 1994 decision to ban certain strains of dangerous E. coli bacteria from ground beef after deadly outbreaks, said Sarah Sorscher, of the Center for Science in the Public Interest.

“Make no mistake: Shipping more salmonella to restaurants and grocery stores is certain to make Americans sicker,” Sorscher said.

Earlier this month, the USDA said it would delay by six months the enforcement of a final rule regulating salmonella levels in certain breaded and stuffed raw chicken products. Enforcement, which was set for May 1, now begins Nov. 3.

That covers foods such as frozen chicken cordon bleu and chicken Kiev dishes that appear to be fully cooked but are only heat-treated to set the batter or coating. Such products have been linked to at least 14 salmonella outbreaks and at least 200 illnesses since 1998, according to the CDC.

The Associated Press Health and Science Department receives support from the Howard Hughes Medical Institute’s Science and Educational Media Group and the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation. The AP is solely responsible for all content.

By JENNIFER McDERMOTT, Associated Press

For years, proponents of green energy have argued that a slow, inefficient permitting process in the United States hinders a transition to clean sources of electricity.

“Permitting reform,” as it’s called, is needed to unleash green energies like solar and wind, which don’t emit greenhouse gases that cause climate change, supporters have argued.

The Trump administration agrees on the need to speed up energy projects, but not for wind or for solar, which is the fastest-growing source of electricity generation in the U.S.

Related Articles

RFK Jr. recounts heroin addiction and spiritual awakening, urges focus on prevention and community

Judge blocks parts of Trump’s overhaul of US elections, including proof-of-citizenship requirement

Judge rules the Trump administration violated a 2019 settlement in deporting a man to El Salvador

Lawsuits take aim at voter-approved transit projects worth billions

Trump science cuts roil university labs, targeting bird feeder research, AI literacy work and more

The Interior Department said late Wednesday it’s adopting an alternative process for energy projects to comply with the National Environmental Policy Act, shortening the reviews to about 28 days and 14 days respectively. It typically takes about two years for the federal government to approve a full environmental impact statement or up to one year to complete an environmental assessment. The 1970 environmental law, known as NEPA, is designed to ensure community safeguards during reviews for a wide range of federal proposals, including roads, bridges and energy projects.

The procedures apply to energy sources including oil, natural gas, petroleum, uranium, coal, biofuels and critical minerals. They’ll also apply to geothermal and hydropower, both which generate electricity without emitting planet-warming greenhouse gases.

President Donald Trump declared a national energy emergency on his first day in office to speed up fossil fuel development.

Secretary of the Interior Doug Burgum said the department is cutting through unnecessary delays to fast-track resources that are essential to the nation’s economy, military readiness and global competitiveness.

The cumbersome process helped enable China to dominant in processing and refining critical minerals, said Rich Nolan, president and chief executive officer of the National Mining Association. Streamlining it will make the U.S. more competitive, he added.

Earthjustice President Abigail Dillen said the administration is using “a fake energy emergency” to strip away essential legal safeguards.

“It’s a blatantly illegal move, and we will see them in court,” she said in a statement.

The Sierra Club said it’s concerned the new approach effectively reduces environmental review and public input to a formality.

“These arbitrary time limits make a complete review of the risks of potentially hazardous projects impossible,” Athan Manuel, director of Sierra Club’s Lands Protection Program, said in a statement Thursday. “A shoddy review means the true hazards of a project may only be known when the air or water thousands of people rely on is dangerously polluted.”

Randi Spivak, at the Center for Biological Diversity, said Interior’s plan “proves that Trump’s fabricated energy emergency is a hoax designed to ram through new fracking and coal mining.” Spivak, the center’s public lands policy director, said it’s a “lose-lose deal” for everyone other than the fossil fuel executives who support Trump.

During the Biden administration, the Interior Department tried to move fast on energy projects but did so within the fairly comfortable confines of existing permitting processes, said Travis Annatoyn, who was then the department’s deputy solicitor for energy and mineral resources.

Burgum, on the other hand, is attempting to change the entire permitting process at a deep, structural level overnight, added Annatoyn, now counsel at the law firm Arnold & Porter.

By excluding solar and wind, the administration risks undercutting the asserted rationale for the energy emergency.

“In a real emergency, you would want to be pouring electrons onto the grid from any source you could find,” he said.

Last week, the Interior Department issued an order to stop construction on a major offshore wind project to power more than 500,000 New York homes. Burgum said he was doing so because it appeared the Biden administration rushed the approval. The Norwegian company Equinor went through a seven-year permitting process before starting to build Empire Wind last year.

The Associated Press’ climate and environmental coverage receives financial support from multiple private foundations. AP is solely responsible for all content. Find AP’s standards for working with philanthropies, a list of supporters and funded coverage areas at AP.org.

By JENNIFER McDERMOTT, Associated Press

For years, proponents of green energy have argued that a slow, inefficient permitting process in the United States hinders a transition to clean sources of electricity.

“Permitting reform,” as it’s called, is needed to unleash green energies like solar and wind, which don’t emit greenhouse gases that cause climate change, supporters have argued.

The Trump administration agrees on the need to speed up energy projects, but not for wind or for solar, which is the fastest-growing source of electricity generation in the U.S.

Related Articles

RFK Jr. recounts heroin addiction and spiritual awakening, urges focus on prevention and community

Judge blocks parts of Trump’s overhaul of US elections, including proof-of-citizenship requirement

Judge rules the Trump administration violated a 2019 settlement in deporting a man to El Salvador

Lawsuits take aim at voter-approved transit projects worth billions

Trump science cuts roil university labs, targeting bird feeder research, AI literacy work and more

The Interior Department said late Wednesday it’s adopting an alternative process for energy projects to comply with the National Environmental Policy Act, shortening the reviews to about 28 days and 14 days respectively. It typically takes about two years for the federal government to approve a full environmental impact statement or up to one year to complete an environmental assessment. The 1970 environmental law, known as NEPA, is designed to ensure community safeguards during reviews for a wide range of federal proposals, including roads, bridges and energy projects.

The procedures apply to energy sources including oil, natural gas, petroleum, uranium, coal, biofuels and critical minerals. They’ll also apply to geothermal and hydropower, both which generate electricity without emitting planet-warming greenhouse gases.

President Donald Trump declared a national energy emergency on his first day in office to speed up fossil fuel development.

Secretary of the Interior Doug Burgum said the department is cutting through unnecessary delays to fast-track resources that are essential to the nation’s economy, military readiness and global competitiveness.

The cumbersome process helped enable China to dominant in processing and refining critical minerals, said Rich Nolan, president and chief executive officer of the National Mining Association. Streamlining it will make the U.S. more competitive, he added.

Earthjustice President Abigail Dillen said the administration is using “a fake energy emergency” to strip away essential legal safeguards.

“It’s a blatantly illegal move, and we will see them in court,” she said in a statement.

The Sierra Club said it’s concerned the new approach effectively reduces environmental review and public input to a formality.

“These arbitrary time limits make a complete review of the risks of potentially hazardous projects impossible,” Athan Manuel, director of Sierra Club’s Lands Protection Program, said in a statement Thursday. “A shoddy review means the true hazards of a project may only be known when the air or water thousands of people rely on is dangerously polluted.”

Randi Spivak, at the Center for Biological Diversity, said Interior’s plan “proves that Trump’s fabricated energy emergency is a hoax designed to ram through new fracking and coal mining.” Spivak, the center’s public lands policy director, said it’s a “lose-lose deal” for everyone other than the fossil fuel executives who support Trump.

During the Biden administration, the Interior Department tried to move fast on energy projects but did so within the fairly comfortable confines of existing permitting processes, said Travis Annatoyn, who was then the department’s deputy solicitor for energy and mineral resources.

Burgum, on the other hand, is attempting to change the entire permitting process at a deep, structural level overnight, added Annatoyn, now counsel at the law firm Arnold & Porter.

By excluding solar and wind, the administration risks undercutting the asserted rationale for the energy emergency.

“In a real emergency, you would want to be pouring electrons onto the grid from any source you could find,” he said.

Last week, the Interior Department issued an order to stop construction on a major offshore wind project to power more than 500,000 New York homes. Burgum said he was doing so because it appeared the Biden administration rushed the approval. The Norwegian company Equinor went through a seven-year permitting process before starting to build Empire Wind last year.

The Associated Press’ climate and environmental coverage receives financial support from multiple private foundations. AP is solely responsible for all content. Find AP’s standards for working with philanthropies, a list of supporters and funded coverage areas at AP.org.