Iran state TV says an Iranian navy helicopter confronted a US destroyer in the Gulf of Oman

posted in: All news | 0

TEHRAN, Iran (AP) — An Iranian navy helicopter confronted a U.S. warship attempting to approach Iranian territorial waters in the Gulf of Oman on Wednesday, Iranian state TV reported.

The incident was the first direct encounter reported between Iranian and U.S. forces since the 12-day war between Iran and Israel, during which U.S. B-52 bombers targeted Iranian nuclear facilities.

Related Articles


UN urges peaceful settlement of disputes as UN chief points to ‘the horror show in Gaza’


Science and local sleuthing identify a 250-year-old shipwreck on a Scottish island


Japanese leader Ishiba vows to remain despite speculation, says he will focus on new US trade deal


UK regulator seeks special status for Apple and Google that could mandate changes for Big Tech


Venezuela’s returning migrants allege abuses in El Salvador’s ‘hell’ prison where US sent them

The report said Iranian forces dispatched the helicopter to confront a U.S. Navy destroyer identified as the USS Fitzgerald that approached the waters at around 10 a.m. local time.

The report said the helicopter flew directly over the U.S. ship and issued a warning to maintain distance. In what the report described as a tense exchange, the U.S. warship reportedly responded by threatening to target the Iranian aircraft if it did not leave the area.

The Navy referred requests for comment to the U.S. Central Command, which said it would provide a response later Wednesday or early Thursday.

The Iranian state TV report said that in response to the threats from the U.S. vessel, Iranian air defense forces announced that the helicopter was under the full protection of Iran’s integrated air defense system.

Eventually the USS Fitzgerald “retreated southward,” the report said.

It was not immediately clear how close the U.S. warship was to Iranian territorial waters.

Appeals court rules MyPillow’s Lindell won’t have to pay $5M ‘Prove Mike Wrong’ prize

posted in: All news | 0

Minnesota-based MyPillow chief executive Mike Lindell got a reprieve Wednesday over a $5 million award to a man who discredited conspiracies tied to the 2020 election.

The 8th Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals reversed a lower court’s ruling. The appeals judges wrote in a 12-page decision that a panel of arbitrators went too far in requiring Lindell to pay a man who offered proof that cyber data used by 2020 election deniers was invalid.

In 2021, Lindell held a South Dakota symposium featuring a “Prove Mike Wrong Challenge” that put up a $5 million reward to anyone who could prove him wrong. Lindell is a staunch ally of President Donald Trump.

Software developer Robert Zeidman concluded the data provided wasn’t valid and spelled out the reasons in a report submitted during the contest.

But when he didn’t get the prize, Zeidman claimed breach of contract by the Lindell Management LLC entity set up to run the event. He went to arbitration and after a three-day hearing was awarded the money.

Lindell went to court and lost the first round. But Wednesday’s appeals court ruling takes Lindell off the hook, barring additional court review.

Lindell separately faces hefty legal judgments over discredited 2020 election claims.

Related Articles


Randall Balmer: When Darrow took on Bryan 100 years ago, science got the win. Or did it?


Man charged with breaking into Sherburne County Government Center with shotgun, firing shots


‘Ringleader’ gets 5½-year term in robbery of gambler’s casino winnings outside Mahtomedi home


MN Sen. Nicole Mitchell found guilty of two felony counts in burglary trial


Roseville police: New information in unsolved 1987 killing of Susan Capistrant

Meta launches new teen safety features, removes 635,000 accounts that sexualize children

posted in: All news | 0

By BARBARA ORTUTAY, Associated Press

Instagram parent company Meta has introduced new safety features aimed at protecting teens who use its platforms, including information about accounts that message them and an option to block and report accounts with one tap.

The company also announced Wednesday that it has removed thousands of accounts that were leaving sexualized comments or requesting sexual images from adult-run accounts of kids under 13. Of these, 135,000 were commenting and another 500,000 were linked to accounts that “interacted inappropriately,” Meta said in a blog post.

Related Articles


9 New Orleans inmates who broke out of jail plead not guilty to escape charges


Hershey raising candy prices by double digits on high cocoa costs


Officials search for a bear that attacked a hiker on a popular trail in Anchorage, Alaska


Texas lawmakers review catastrophic floods but say they aren’t out to assign blame


Harvard under investigation over participation in visa program for foreign students and researchers

The heightened measures arrive as social media companies face increased scrutiny over how their platform affects the mental health and well-being of younger users. This includes protecting children from predatory adults and scammers who ask — then extort— them for nude images.

Meta said teen users blocked more than a million accounts and reported another million after seeing a “safety notice” that reminds people to “be cautious in private messages and to block and report anything that makes them uncomfortable.”

Earlier this year, Meta began to test the use of artificial intelligence to determine if kids are lying about their ages on Instagram, which is technically only allowed for those over 13. If it is determined that a user is misrepresenting their age, the account will automatically become a teen account, which has more restrictions than an adult account. Teen accounts are private by default. Private messages are restricted so teens can only receive them from people they follow or are already connected to. In 2024, the company made teen accounts private by default.

Meta faces lawsuits from dozens of U.S. states that accuse it of harming young people and contributing to the youth mental health crisis by knowingly and deliberately designing features on Instagram and Facebook that addict children to its platforms.

US automakers say Trump’s 15% tariff deal with Japan puts them at a disadvantage

posted in: All news | 0

By JOSH BOAK and ALEXA ST. JOHN, Associated Press

WASHINGTON (AP) — U.S. automakers are concerned about President Donald Trump’s agreement to tariff Japanese vehicles at 15%, saying they will face steeper import taxes on steel, aluminum and parts than their competitors.

“We need to review all the details of the agreement, but this is a deal that will charge lower tariffs on Japanese autos with no U.S. content,” said Matt Blunt, president of the American Automotive Policy Council, which represents the Big 3 American automakers, General Motors, Ford and Jeep-maker Stellantis.

Blunt said in an interview the U.S. companies and workers “definitely are at a disadvantage” because they face a 50% tariff on steel and aluminum and a 25% tariff on parts and finished vehicles, with some exceptions for products covered under the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement that went into effect in 2020.

The domestic automaker reaction reveals the challenge of enforcing policies across the world economy, showing that for all of Trump’s promises there can be genuine tradeoffs from policy choices that risk serious blowback in politically important states such as Michigan and Wisconsin, where automaking is both a source of income and of identity.

Trump portrayed the trade framework as a major win after announcing it on Tuesday, saying it would add hundreds of thousands of jobs to the U.S. economy and open the Japanese economy in ways that could close a persistent trade imbalance. The agreement includes a 15% tariff that replaces the 25% import tax the Republican president had threatened to charge starting on Aug. 1. Japan would also put together $550 billion to invest in U.S. projects, the White House said.

Related Articles


Meta launches new teen safety features, removes 635,000 accounts that sexualize children


Hershey raising candy prices by double digits on high cocoa costs


UK regulator seeks special status for Apple and Google that could mandate changes for Big Tech


Americans are paying for Trump’s tariffs, not foreign companies


Splurge now, save later? 4 things to buy before prices rise

The framework with Japan will remove regulations that prevent American vehicles from being sold in that country, the White House has said, adding that it would be possible for vehicles built in Detroit to be shipped directly to Japan and ready to be sold.

But Blunt said that foreign auto producers, including the U.S., Europe and South Korea, have just a 6% share in Japan, raising skepticism that simply having the open market that the Trump administration says will exist in that country will be sufficient.

“Tough nut to crack, and I’d be very surprised if we see any meaningful market penetration in Japan,” Blunt said.

Major Japanese automakers Toyota, Honda and Nissan did not immediately respond to a request for comment on the trade framework, nor did Autos Drive America or the Alliance for Automotive Innovation, organizations that also represent the industry.

There is the possibility that the Japanese framework would give automakers and other countries grounds for pushing for changes in the Trump administration’s tariffs regime. The president has previously said that flexibility in import tax negotiations is something he values. The USMCA is up for review next year.

Ford, GM and Stellantis do “have every right to be upset,” said Sam Fiorani, vice president at consultancy AutoForecast Solutions. But “Honda, Toyota, and Nissan still import vehicles from Mexico and Canada, where the current levels of tariffs can be higher than those applied to Japanese imports. Most of the high-volume models from Japanese brands are already produced in North America.”

Fiorani noted that among the few exceptions are the Toyota 4Runner, the Mazda CX-5 and the Subaru Forester, but most of the other imports fill niches that are too small to warrant production in the U.S.

“There will be negotiations between the U.S. and Canada and Mexico, and it will probably result in tariffs no higher than 15%,” Fiorani added, “but nobody seems to be in a hurry to negotiate around the last Trump administration’s free trade agreement.”

St. John contributed from Detroit.