The team state wrestling tournament is a two-day affair this season, a departure from the longstanding, single-day format.

As part of the entire tournament adding an extra day of competition, the team portion will open with the quarterfinals Wednesday afternoon before competing in the semifinals later that evening, with the championship duals set for Thursday night.

Brackets for all three classes were recently unveiled.

The entire tournament will take place at Grand Casino Arena in downtown St. Paul, and can be viewed online on the Neighborhood Sports Network.

The complete brackets for each class are listed below and can be found on the MSHSL site.

Brackets will be updated daily on the website with results throughout the tournament.

Class 3A

Wednesday’s Quarterfinals, 4 p.m.

No. 1 St. Michael-Albertville vs. Brainerd

No. 4 Hastings vs. No. 5 Elk River

No. 2 Stillwater vs. Apple Valley

No. 3 Shakopee vs. Northfield

Wednesday’s Semifinals, 8 p.m.

STMA/Brainerd vs. Hastings/Elk River

Still/AV vs. Shak/Northfield

Thursday’s final, 7 p.m.

Semifinal winners

Class 2A

Wednesday’s quarterfinals, 4 p.m.

No. 1 Simley vs. South St. Paul

No. 4 Scott West vs. No. 5 Foley

No. 2 New Ulm vs. Totino-Grace

No. 3 Pierz vs. Perham

Wednesday’s semifinals, 8 p.m.

Simley/SSP vs. SW/Foley

New Ulm/TG vs. Pierz/Per

Thursday’s final, 7 p.m.

Semifinal winners

Class A

Wednesday’s quarterfinals, 6 p.m.

No. 1 Staples-Motley vs. Kenyon-Wanamingo

No. 4 United North Central vs. No. 5 Jackson County Central

No. 2 Minneota vs. LeSueur-Henderson

No. 3 Chatfield vs. West Central Area/Ashby/Brandon-Evansville

Wednesday’s semifinals, 8 p.m.

SM/KW vs. UNC/JCC

Minnesota/LSH vs. Chat/WCAAABE

Thursday’s final, 7 p.m.

Semifinal winners

Related Articles

Girls state hockey: Pioneers hang on to win 2A title

Girls state hockey: Breck wins Class A title

State gymnastics: North/Tartan’s Sydney Johnson wins two titles

Girls state hockey: Late power-play goal lifts Hill-Murray past Edina

State gymnastics: Monticello proves it belongs in 2A with team state title

By LINDSAY WHITEHURST

WASHINGTON (AP) — The Supreme Court said Monday that it will hear from oil and gas companies trying to block lawsuits seeking to hold the industry liable for billions of dollars in damage linked to climate change.

The conservative-majority court agreed to take up a case from Boulder, Colorado, among a series of lawsuits alleging the companies deceived the public about how fossil fuels contribute to climate change.

Governments around the country have sought damages totaling billions of dollars, arguing it’s necessary to help pay for rebuilding after wildfires, rising sea levels and severe storms worsened by climate change. The lawsuits come amid a wave of legal actions in states including California, Hawaii and New Jersey and worldwide seeking to leverage action through the courts.

Suncor Energy and ExxonMobil appealed to the Supreme Court after Colorado’s highest court let the Boulder case proceed. The companies argue emissions are a national issue that should be heard in federal court, where similar suits have been tossed out.

“The use of state law to address global climate change represents a serious threat to one of our Nation’s most critical sectors,” attorneys wrote.

President Donald Trump’s administration weighed in to support the companies and urge the justices to reverse the Colorado Supreme Court decision, saying it would mean “every locality in the country could sue essentially anyone in the world for contributing to global climate change.”

Trump, a Republican, has criticized the lawsuits in an executive order, and the Justice Department has sought to head some off in court.

Attorneys for Boulder had agued that the litigation is still in early stages and should stay in state court. “There is no constitutional bar to states addressing in-state harms caused by out-of-state conduct, be it the negligent design of an automobile or sale of asbestos,” they wrote.

Follow the AP’s coverage of the U.S. Supreme Court at https://apnews.com/hub/us-supreme-court.

By ALANNA DURKIN RICHER and ERIC TUCKER

WASHINGTON (AP) — A federal judge on Monday permanently barred the release of a report by special counsel Jack Smith on his investigation into President Donald Trump’s hoarding of classified documents at his Mar-a-Lago estate.

Related Articles

State Department orders nonessential US diplomats to leave Lebanon as tensions with Iran soar

Rubio heads to Caribbean to reassert US interests after Venezuela strikes and Iran threats

FBI director joins US men’s hockey team in locker room celebration of Olympic gold medal

How Trump will use his State of the Union address to sell skeptical midterm voters on his plans

25 Mexican National Guard troops left dead in Jalisco after cartel leader’s killing, official says

U.S. District Judge Aileen Cannon, who was nominated to the bench by Trump, granted a request from the Republican president to keep under wraps the report on a criminal investigation once seen as posing significant legal peril to Trump.

Smith and his team produced a two-volume report on investigations into Trump’s efforts to overturn the 2020 presidential election after he lost to Joe Biden and his retention of classified documents at his estate in Palm Beach, Florida, after he left the White House following his first term.

Both investigations produced indictments that were abandoned by Smith’s team after Trump’s November 2024 election win in light of longstanding Justice Department legal opinions that say sitting presidents cannot face federal prosecution.

Cannon, who in 2024 dismissed the case after concluding that Smith was unlawfully appointed, said the release of the report would present a “manifest injustice” to Trump and his two co-defendants.

“Special Counsel Smith, acting without lawful authority, obtained an indictment in this action and initiated proceedings that resulted in a final order of dismissal of all charges,” she wrote. “As a result, the former defendants in this case, like any other defendant in this situation, still enjoy the presumption of innocence held sacrosanct in our constitutional order.”

President Donald Trump attends the National Governors Association dinner at the White House, Saturday, Feb. 21, 2026, in Washington. (AP Photo/Allison Robbert)

She said that though it is true that special counsels have historically released reports at the conclusion of their work, they have done so either after electing not to bring charges in a particular case or “after adjudications of guilt by plea or trial.”

“The Court strains to find a situation in which a former special counsel has released a report after initiating criminal charges that did not result in a finding of guilt, at least not in a situation like this one, where the defendants contested the charges from the outset and still proclaim their innocence.”

By HOGIR AL ABDO, GHAITH ALSAYED and QASSIM ABDUL-ZAHRA

QAMISHLI, Syria (AP) — U.S. forces are withdrawing from a key base in northeastern Syria, officials said Monday, in what appears to be part of a larger drawdown of U.S. forces in Syria.

Iraqi and Syrian security officials said that the U.S. military had begun moving its forces and equipment from the Qasrak base in Syria to Iraq’s semi-autonomous Kurdish region.

Related Articles

Judge blocks release of special counsel Smith’s report on Trump classified documents case

State Department orders nonessential US diplomats to leave Lebanon as tensions with Iran soar

Rubio heads to Caribbean to reassert US interests after Venezuela strikes and Iran threats

FBI director joins US men’s hockey team in locker room celebration of Olympic gold medal

How Trump will use his State of the Union address to sell skeptical midterm voters on his plans

Associated Press journalists in the city of Qamishli in northeast Syria saw a convoy of dozens of trucks carrying military vehicles and equipment Monday, with military helicopters circling overhead, moving toward the Iraqi border.

The U.S. military’s Central Command did not respond to a request for comment, nor did the Kurdish-led Syrian Democratic Forces, which controls the area around the Qasrak base.

A senior Iraqi security official said evacuation of the base had begun Sunday and that on Monday, U.S. forces and military equipment coming from the base crossed into Iraq’s semi-autonomous northern Kurdish region.

A Syrian security official said about 200 soldiers remained at the base Monday and that work was underway to dismantle military jamming and air defense systems and the engineering section at the base.

Both officials spoke on condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to comment publicly.

Earlier this month, CENTCOM and Syria’s defense ministry announced that U.S. troops had left another base, the al-Tanf base in eastern Syria near the border with Jordan.

The departure of U.S. forces from the bases comes after the U.S. military completed the transfer of some 5,700 accused Islamic State militants from detention centers in northeast Syria to prisons in Iraq, where they will be put on trial.

The main mission of the U.S. troops in Syria is to prevent a resurgence of IS. The extremist group lost control of the last territory it held in Syria in 2019 but its sleeper cells have continued to stage periodic attacks in Syria, Iraq and abroad.

The decision to transfer the prisoners to Iraq came after fighting between Syrian government forces and the SDF last month, during which dozens of prisoners escaped from one of the detention centers holding IS suspects, while an unknown number of families are believed to have fled from al Hol camp, which housed the wives and children of IS members.

The remaining residents of the camp have now been transferred to another facility or repatriated.

AlSayed reported from Damascus and Abdul-Zahra from Baghdad.