US suspending immigrant visa processing from 75 countries over public assistance

posted in: All news | 0

By MATTHEW LEE, AP Diplomatic Writer

WASHINGTON (AP) — The State Department says it will suspend the processing of immigrant visas for citizens of 75 countries whose nationals are deemed likely to require public assistance while living in the United States.

The State Department, led by Secretary Marco Rubio, said Wednesday it had instructed consular officers to halt immigrant visa applications from the countries affected in accordance with a broader order issued in November that tightened rules around potential immigrants who might become “public charges” in the U.S. The suspension will not apply to applicants seeking non-immigrant, or temporary tourist or business visas.

“The Trump administration is bringing an end to the abuse of America’s immigration system by those who would extract wealth from the American people,” the department said in a statement. “Immigrant visa processing from these 75 countries will be paused while the State Department reassess immigration processing procedures to prevent the entry of foreign nationals who would take welfare and public benefits.”

The statement did not identify which countries would be affected by the pause, but President Donald Trump’s administration has already severely restricted immigrant and non-immigrant visa processing for citizens of dozens of countries, many of them in Africa.

The suspension will begin on Jan. 21.

Related Articles


Supreme Court revives GOP congressman’s challenge to late-arriving mail ballot law


Sen. Slotkin is being investigated by the Trump administration for Democrats’ video to troops


Schumer tells the AP Democrats are preparing for Trump to disrupt and dispute the midterms: Q&A


Developer of New York offshore wind farm is asking a federal judge to spare it from Trump


What Americans think about Trump’s military intervention abroad, according to a new poll

Trump envoy says Gaza is entering second phase of ceasefire plan

posted in: All news | 0

WASHINGTON (AP) — The United States says it’s moving into the next phase of a Gaza ceasefire plan involving disarming Hamas, rebuilding and daily governance.

Trump envoy Steve Witkoff says in a post on X that the ceasefire deal was entering a phase focused on demilitarizing Gaza, establishing a technocratic government and reconstruction.

Witkoff did not offer any details Wednesday about the new transitional Palestinian administration that would govern Gaza.

The White House did not immediately offer any details, either. Witkoff said that the U.S. expects Hamas to immediately return the final deceased hostage as part of its obligations under the deal.

Related Articles


Why Israel is divided over how to investigate Oct. 7 failures


Trump pick for Gaza board Nickolay Mladenov frequently worked to ease Mideast tensions


Israeli strikes kill at least 13 across Gaza, as Trump is expected to announce Board of Peace


Israel says Bulgarian diplomat Nickolay Mladenov to direct Trump’s Board of Peace for Gaza


Daniel DePetris: The foreign policy moves Donald Trump got right in 2025

No immediate judicial decision on a request to stop the immigration crackdown in Minnesota

posted in: All news | 0

By STEVE KARNOWSKI

MINNEAPOLIS (AP) — A judge made no immediate decision Wednesday on Minnesota’s request to suspend the Trump administration’s immigration crackdown in the state, where federal agents have yanked people from cars and confronted angry bystanders demanding they pack up and leave.

Plumes of tear gas, the deployment of chemical irritants and the screech of protest whistles have become common on the streets of Minneapolis, especially since an immigration agent fatally shot Renee Good in the head on Jan. 7 as she drove away.

“What we need most of all right now is a pause. The temperature needs to be lowered,” state Assistant Attorney General Brian Carter said during the first hearing in a lawsuit filed by Minnesota and the cities of Minneapolis and St. Paul.

U.S. District Judge Katherine Menendez promised to keep the case “on the front burner” and gave the U.S. Justice Department until Monday to file a response to the request for a restraining order. Local leaders say the government is violating free speech and other constitutional rights with the surge of law enforcement.

Menendez said the state and cities will have a few more days to respond.

“It is simply recognition that these are grave and important matters,” the judge said of the timetable, noting there are few legal precedents to apply to some of the key points in the case.

Government attorney Andrew Warden suggested the slower approach set by Menendez was appropriate.

Related Articles


Producer prices rise a mild 0.2% in November, government says in report delayed by federal shutdown


2025 US home sales stuck at 30-year low as mortgage rates, prices weighed on market


Wall Street slumps as bank and tech stocks fall


FBI searches home of Washington Post reporter in classified documents probe, newspaper says


Some personnel at key US base in Qatar advised to evacuate as Iran official brings up earlier attack

The Department of Homeland Security says it has made more than 2,000 arrests in the state since early December and is vowing to not back down.

“What we see right now is discrimination taking place only on the basis of race: Are you Latino or are you Somali? And then it is indiscriminate thereafter,” Minneapolis Mayor Jacob Frey told Fox News. “In other words, they are pulling people off the streets. They have pulled U.S. citizens off the streets and you don’t need to take my word for it at this point. This has been very well documented.”

Minnesota officials recommend weapons screening at state Capitol

posted in: All news | 0

Minnesota officials are recommending that lawmakers pass legislation this session for weapons screening at the state Capitol.

During the last meeting of the Advisory Committee on Capitol Area Security on Tuesday members voted on potential security changes in accordance with a third-party assessment from The Axtell Group. The Axtell Group was hired July 29 in response to the Minnesota lawmaker shootings on June 14, as well as a break-in and threats of violence at the Capitol.

Weapons screening — which passed 4-2 — was the only recommendation from the report to not pass unanimously. Other recommendations include emergency drills and technology systems integration. The full 400-page report of Axtell’s assessment and recommendations is not available to the public as it is protected by the Government Data Privacy Act and contains sensitive security information, lawmakers said.

At the committee’s Jan. 7 meeting, Todd Axtell, former St. Paul police chief and founder of the Axtell group, said screening is the “biggest bang for your buck.”

“The No. 1 thing that the state of Minnesota could do to help keep people more safe in these spaces is to screen for dangerous items,” he said.

Funding

One of the members who voted against the weapons screening provision was Rep. Jim Nash, R-Waconia.

“The funding picture is beyond unclear, and my reticence on moving forward on that is because we don’t have an understanding of where things are. And as my legislative career has unfolded here, I don’t vote for things that I don’t have my arms folded around from a funding perspective,” he said Tuesday.

Rep. Kelly Moller, DFL-Shoreview, said she doesn’t think the funding rationale stands, as other security measures recommended Tuesday could also carry costs.

“I’m still a little uncertain as to why they use the funding rationale to vote ‘no’ for the thing that was the No. 1 item that the security folks said that we could do that would result in the biggest bang for our buck when it comes to security,” Moller said. “I really do hope that that changes when these bills do come before the Legislature.”

No explicit weapons vote

The committee didn’t explicitly vote on whether to ban certain weapons at the Capitol on Tuesday, despite at least some support from the public to do so. Lexi Anderson with Students Demand Action testified in favor of banning guns before the committee.

“Plans being discussed are a great first step. Banning guns from Capitol grounds should also be part of the safety plan when students come here, it matters that we know that adults are thinking ahead about our safety,” she said. “The first thing my mom said to me when I told her I was here today to testify … ‘I don’t know if that’s safe.’ My friends who are part of Students Demand Action aren’t here today because they are afraid of being shot and detained in this very building.”

It’s not clear whether the vote to recommend weapons screening includes a recommendation to ban guns. After the meeting adjourned, Sen. Bonnie Westlin, DFL-Plymouth, said she thinks banning guns is “implicit” in the weapons screening recommendation.

“I think that addressing guns on the Capitol is implicit in this weapons screening, and I think the lieutenant governor has said, ‘We’re going to screen for weapons. That’s what we’re recommending, and that people should not be bringing guns on the Capitol complex,’” Westlin said.

Minnesota 1 of 6 capitols that don’t restrict firearms

Minnesota’s is one of six capitols that don’t restrict firearms, and one of 10 without some form of weapons screening, according to the Axtell group.

Related Articles


Minnesota to appeal $2B Medicaid funding pause for programs at risk for fraud


Joe Soucheray: Under the deluding weight of political fealty, the center does not hold


Minnesota freezes provider enrollment for 13 Medicaid programs over fraud risk


Arne Carlson, et al: Let’s take the road to excellence, Minnesota


MN audit finds weak oversight, fraud risk in Human Service grants

A Minnesota State Fair poll conducted by Minnesota House Research found 79% of 10,000 fairgoers favored banning guns. At an Advisory Committee on Capitol Area Security meeting on Jan. 7, Maggiy Emery, executive director of Protect Minnesota, testified in favor of banning guns.

“We’re living through a period of rapidly rising political violence,” she said. “Allowing guns in the Capitol doesn’t make this building safer. It magnifies intimidation, silences voices, and pushes advocates, staff and community members out of civic engagement. No one should have to choose between protecting their life, engaging in democracy and doing their job.”