Editorial: Civilian casualties part of Hamas’ terror plan

posted in: News | 0

Early news reports are the first draft of history, and Hamas’ effort to blame Israel for an explosion at a Gaza hospital are collapsing under scrutiny. It’s also vital to understand that there’s a vast gulf between trying to minimize civilian casualties and encouraging them as a propaganda tool.

Hundreds were killed last Tuesday in Gaza City at a hospital crowded with people seeking safe haven. U.S. intelligence officials say the explosion came from a rocket launched by the Palestinian Islamic Jihad group that went off prematurely.

“Among the evidence that’s been gathered is a blast analysis that suggests it was a ground explosion rather than an airstrike that hit the hospital,” a source told CNN. “There was no singular crater suggesting there was a bomb, but there was extensive fire damage and scattered debris that is consistent with an explosion starting from the ground level, according to the source.”

Israel also released an audio recording that it said caught Hamas operatives discussing the blast.

The loss of innocent lives is a horrific tragedy no matter its inevitability during war. Yet while Israel takes steps to curtail the civilian death toll, its enemies do the opposite. The initial attack on Israel was indiscriminate and brutal, calculated to kill innocent men, women and children. Hamas has also taken innocent Israelis — and Americans — hostage and threatened to broadcast executions. This is barbarism.

It’s also part of a strategy that promotes civilian deaths — and it has been going on for two decades.

“When used as human shields, civilians provide cover for Hamas military activities, and the resultant casualties serve the group’s propaganda interests,” Jeffrey White wrote for The Washington Institute in 2014. “In short, Hamas is acting more like a guerrilla group fighting an insurgency than a government responsible for the safety of its citizenry.”

As White notes, there are steps Hamas terrorists could take — wearing uniforms, moving weapons from populated areas, staying out of civilian buildings — if they chose to lower the civilian death count. Instead, they emphasize such tactics.

A decade ago, Hamas provoked Israel by firing rockets into the country without regard for innocents. Jeffrey Goldberg of The Atlantic came to the obvious conclusion. “Hamas is trying to get Israel to kill as many Palestinians as possible,” he wrote. “Dead Palestinians represent a crucial propaganda victory for the nihilists of Hamas. It is perverse, but true. It is also the best possible explanation for Hamas’ behavior, because Hamas has no other plausible strategic goal here.”

The words ring true today. Israel has a right to defend itself and its people. Hamas wants to kill innocents and push Israel into the sea. The latter is the problem.

Las Vegas Review-Journal/Tribune News Service

 

Editorial cartoon by Steve Kelley (Creators Syndicate)

 

‘Anatomy of a Fall’ weaves mystery, courtroom drama

posted in: Adventure | 0

A smash hit in France after winning the Palme d’Or, Cannes’ top prize, “Anatomy of a Fall” soars with its fresh approach to the classic courtroom drama.

Like the great 1959 “Anatomy of a Murder,” whose aura this “Anatomy” invokes, what co-writer and director Justine Triet aims to emphasize with her “Anatomy” is ambiguity.  In Otto Preminger’s masterpiece the question is not if a jealous husband killed the man accused of raping his wife, it’s “was it really non-consensual?”

“That movie is very important for me.  I saw that movie 10 years ago,” Triet, 45, said in a post-screening Q&A at the New York Film Festival. “It’s so modern the way they are playing in the courtroom.”

In “Anatomy of a Fall” the question is whether Sandra (Germany’s Sandra Hüller), a writer, pushed her husband, also a writer, out the window of their Grenoble chalet. Or did he jump?

His dead body is discovered in the snow by his partially blind 9-year-old son who had been out walking their dog.

This “Anatomy,” which is in French and English, begins with Sandra asking a journalist, “What do you want to know?”

But what the actress needed to know — whether Sandra was guilty or not — was something Triet refused to reveal.

“I’m a big fan of working with what is in the script,” Hüller, 45, said. “I know you don’t need more information. But that first sentence is the headline of the film and I didn’t realize that while shooting it.

“But everything I needed to know was there — it was a perfect script. All the complexity of the character was there. All the questions I had that would never be answered. These were questions Justine couldn’t and wouldn’t answer.

“I was dealing with a character who kept her secrets and I made one decision: I would always tell the truth.  The sentences I would say would be true. That was the main thing.”

“There are lots of movies like this,” Triet allowed. “So we had to find a way to make our movie.”

Unlike most courtroom dramas where it is in court that truth is discovered, in this court fictions emerge.

That’s true, Triet acknowledged.  “At the beginning it was OK that we create something. We were telling a story with doubt and I wanted to remain on the side of ambiguity and ambivalence. I like to watch things that don’t offer a resolution. And the more we know about her, the more opaque she is.

“The trial is like two fictions — and truth is in the middle. But it’s not a faithful truth. So we can’t decide.”

“Anatomy of a Fall” opens Friday

Dear Abby: Cross-dressing man eager for Halloween

posted in: Adventure | 0

Dear Abby: I’m a cross-dresser who is able to enjoy wearing women’s clothes in private at home. With Halloween around the corner, I want nothing more than to be fully dressed as a woman and go outside to experience how it feels. I want to wear a nice dress, high heels, pantyhose, wig, makeup, etc.

My wife knows I enjoy dressing up and tolerates it. But she’s unwilling to let me express myself out of the house or help me with the process. How can I get her to help me get dolled up and experience being a woman for one night? I feel so deprived not being able to be who I want to be. — Dressed and Ready

Dear Dressed: Halloween is the one night of the year when many people, yourself included, can decide to dress up and become who they really are (or would like to be). Because your wife won’t assist you, consider visiting a makeup counter and asking one of the salespeople to help with your makeup that night. And, if nothing in your closet suits the real you, rent or buy an outfit for the occasion. You do not need anyone’s “permission.”

Dear Abby: A very good friend and neighbor sold a Taylor Swift ticket to my 15-year-old daughter for $900. I should mention, my daughter would have given her right arm for the chance to go to the show. The original ticket was purchased for $300, including fees. Initially, my friend wanted to sell it for $1,000, but she offered a “discount” because my daughter’s 16th birthday was coming up.

I can appreciate the value of the hottest ticket in town and that it comes with an inflated price tag. However, from my point of view, it was merely a transaction meant for my friend to make a handsome profit off of my kid. I’m extremely disappointed at the price gouging, and now I think of the woman differently. I have been avoiding her because she will likely become defensive. Am I wrong in thinking her actions were not that of a good friend after all? — Feeling Swindled in the West

Dear Feeling Swindled: Because your neighbor sold the ticket to your daughter at three times what she paid for it, I would have to agree; she acted more like a ticket broker than a good friend. I see no reason why you should cut her off completely, but now you know she’s a shark when it comes to “business,” so keep your eyes open. On the upside, your daughter got to live her dream that night, and many of the fans who saw Taylor Swift in action have said it was the best show of their lives.

Dear Abby: What’s the best way to tell your siblings you think it’s time to stop exchanging Christmas gifts? We’re all in our 60s, and, frankly, I don’t feel they are ever very enthused about what we get them. It just seems like it’s time, anyway. — Done in New York

Dear Done: The best way to convey that message would be verbally, so you can explain that you are all long past childhood and feel a cheery Christmas greeting would suffice. And the best TIME to give them the news would be well before the Christmas holidays.

Dear Abby is written by Abigail Van Buren, also known as Jeanne Phillips, and was founded by her mother, Pauline Phillips. Contact Dear Abby at www.DearAbby.com

Mike Preston: Make no mistake, Ravens defense is still the star of the show | COMMENTARY

posted in: News | 0

The Ravens defense is as good as advertised.

Baltimore entered Sunday’s game against Detroit with the NFL’s No. 2 overall defense but had not played an offense as complete as the Lions’. Then the Ravens shut them down. Actually, it was a beatdown, 38-6.

There will be a lot of talk about Ravens quarterback Lamar Jackson and the offense after they scored five touchdowns and a field goal on 10 possessions and piled up 503 yards of total offense, but the story of this win was the Ravens defense.

This group has been consistent all season, and it has to be that way because the offense is erratic. On Sunday, the Ravens shut out Detroit for three quarters and allowed only 337 yards of total offense, 97 of which came in the first half when the game was still somewhat competitive.

If the Lions are one of the best offenses in the NFL, then what does that say about the Ravens defense? Baltimore crushed Detroit until the last quarter, when it was garbage time.

“If I recall, I think earlier in the week, I said I’m from the ‘show me’ business,” Ravens middle linebacker Roquan Smith said. “A lot of things happened here and there, but you have to show me once we’re on the field.

“I don’t believe in all the things you hear and say. Like I said, that team hadn’t been tested just yet, so that’s what it was.”

The same could have been said about the Ravens. In the second half of the 2022 season, they had perhaps the best defense in the NFL after the San Francisco 49ers. But in 2023, they hadn’t been tested by a good quarterback because both the Cincinnati Bengals’ Joe Burrow and Pittsburgh Steelers’ Kenny Pickett played injured and Deshaun Watson missed the Ravens’ 28-3 victory against Cleveland on Oct. 1 because of a shoulder injury.

Then came the Lions. They were without injured starting running back David Montgomery, but the Ravens were also missing their top back J.K. Dobbins.

Let’s call that a draw. The game wasn’t.

The Ravens sacked Lions quarterback Jared Goff five times. In previous years, there were always questions about the Ravens’ pass rush, but they entered Sunday leading the league in sacks. It will be interesting to see if outside linebackers Kyle Van Noy, 32, and Jadeveon Clowney, 30, hold up at the end of the season, but so far they’ve played well.

Van Noy had five tackles Sunday, including two sacks. By the end of the third quarter, Goff’s body language was easy to read: “Can’t we go home now?”

“[Defensive coordinator] Mike [Macdonald] reiterated all the time throughout the week that if you startle Goff early, he starts to get panicky,” Ravens defensive end Justin Madubuike said. “That’s exactly what happened.”

The Ravens also stuffed the Lions’ running game, which finished with 84 yards, 21 of which came on a touchdown run by rookie Jahmyr Gibbs with 14:05 left in the fourth quarter.

No team has been able to run the ball against the Ravens, which is why they entered Sunday ranked 10th in the league allowing 97.7 rushing yards per game.

A major key to winning in the NFL is to shut down the run and the play-action passing game, making the opponent one-dimensional. That’s what the Ravens did to the Lions.

“You know, the run game always helps us,” Detroit coach Dan Campbell said. “That’s something that we always want to hang our hat on. It’s kind of where everything starts for us. I’ll be the first to say, when you go three-and-out your first two series, and then they gain 14 points in their first two series, that’s a hard recipe there early in the game. You feel like you get put in a pretty tough spot in both areas.

“I thought we would be able to overcome it and get some momentum back. We thought, but we couldn’t get it turned over. We couldn’t quite get going.”

Maybe the most surprising development has been the play of the Ravens secondary. All week there was concern about the Lions’ passing game with receivers Josh Reynolds and Amon-Ra St. Brown and rookie tight end Sam LaPorta. Detroit had the NFL’s fourth-ranked passing game (averaging 259.5 yards per game), and the Ravens were concerned about yards after the catch, especially since Detroit entered with 32 plays of more than 20 yards.

But the Lions averaged only 8.6 yards per catch Sunday. St. Brown had 13 catches for 102 yards but wasn’t much of a factor. The receivers couldn’t shake free of cornerback Marlon Humphrey and safety Kyle Hamilton.

The Ravens also got strong games from reserve safety Geno Stone — who added his league-leading fourth interception — and cornerback Arthur Maulet. They also started cornerback Brandon Stephens, a converted safety. Maulet had eight tackles and a sack, and Hamilton added seven tackles.

Where do the Ravens find these guys?

“You have to be steeled to play back there,” Ravens coach John Harbaugh said. “You have to have a certain mindset, and we want tough guys. We want guys that will do their job, but guys that will have their eyes where they’re supposed to be when they’re supposed to be there, tackle and play hard.”

That’s the brand of football Baltimore fans are used to seeing.

The game has changed since the Ravens won Super Bowl XXXV with one of the best defenses ever, but this year’s unit, built around linebackers Smith and Patrick Queen, is good, too. It sounds familiar to the one in 2000 with linebackers Peter Boulware, Jamie Sharper and Ray Lewis.

Only time will tell if the 2023 Ravens can be mentioned in the same breath as that legendary group. But for right now, the calling card of this team is still defense, which has to carry the Ravens until the offense becomes more consistent.

The offense is a work in progress. The defense is already a finished product.

They proved it again Sunday.

()