St. Paul man charged with misdemeanors in dogs’ attack on girl, 7

posted in: News | 0

Prosecutors recently charged a St. Paul man with misdemeanors after his five dogs escaped his yard and attacked a 7-year-old girl.

The dogs bit pieces of her nose, ear and thigh off, a sibling of the girl wrote on a fundraising page.

A neighbor’s doorbell camera captured the incident in Frogtown and another witness identified the dogs’ owner as a 37-year-old man who lives nearby, according to a criminal complaint filed Friday.

The man told police he let his dogs out on Feb. 8 and didn’t realize the gate was open.

The girl was walking home from her school bus stop with a parent when the dogs suddenly attacked her in the 600 block of Van Buren Avenue. The child’s parent struck the dogs to try to get them off her.

The attack stopped when a person — later identified as the dogs’ owner — driving a vehicle honked its horn, causing the dog to run away. The dogs’ owner was seen exiting his vehicle briefly before reentering and driving in the direction of the dogs.

Police have said the dogs’ owner allowed St. Paul Animal Control to take the dogs the next day. He was only able to provide proof of rabies vaccine for two of the dogs, did not have a license for any of dogs, and hadn’t applied for a permit allowing him to own more than three dogs, the complaint said.

Animal Control declared the dogs dangerous on Feb. 13, after which the owner surrendered them to Animal Control and they were euthanized.

The fundraiser for the girl is to ensure she gets access to a plastic surgeon “to make sure that she has no more scarring than is possible since she has injuries to her face,” according to a GoFundMe started by her sibling.

Related Articles

Crime & Public Safety |


Driver was playing ‘air guitar’ when he killed Moose Lake pedestrian, charges say

Crime & Public Safety |


Genealogy research links Winona woman to newborn found dead in Mississippi River

Crime & Public Safety |


Girl, 6, struck by car in St. Paul on Saturday being treated for non-life-threatening injuries

Crime & Public Safety |


Detectives investigating death after man found on St. Paul sidewalk

Crime & Public Safety |


Teen pleads guilty in murder case that Minnesota’s attorney general took away from local prosecutor

Driver was playing ‘air guitar’ when he killed Moose Lake pedestrian, charges say

posted in: Society | 0

CARLTON — An Iron Range man allegedly admitted he was sleepy and playing “air guitar” when he struck and killed a pedestrian in Moose Lake last week.

Brent James Keranen, 21, of Pengilly, had been cited hours earlier after hitting a Minnesota State Patrol squad car as he left the Twin Cities, where he had stayed up “very late” the night before drinking with friends, according to a criminal complaint.

Brent James Keranen (Courtesy of the Carleton County sheriff’s office)

Authorities said Keranen was headed home when he “veered” off Minnesota Highway 73 near Jon Brown Drive just after 2 p.m. Thursday, striking and killing Justin McNeil, 61, of Moose Lake.

A roadside, preliminary breath test reportedly placed Keranen’s blood-alcohol concentration at 0.06, which is slightly below the legal limit for driving in Minnesota.

The complaint, filed late Friday in State District Court, says McNeil had just left the Dollar General store on foot and was walking along the northbound shoulder of Highway 73 when he was hit by the vehicle, which was traveling in the same direction. The Carlton County Sheriff’s Office reported the victim was found in a ditch and pronounced dead at the scene.

Keranen, according to the complaint, told investigators he was “working a lot of hours” and had been up late drinking alcohol. He admitted, and police were able to confirm, that he had fallen asleep on the drive north and “struck or contacted a trooper’s squad vehicle with his vehicle when leaving the metro area.”

The complaint says Keranen told Carlton County law enforcement that he registered a 0.066 on a breath test at that point, receiving a ticket before continuing on his way. He allegedly acknowledged he was tired but said he stopped and consumed a 5-Hour Energy drink.

Keranen allegedly explained that while driving through Moose Lake, a “good song” began playing on the radio, prompting him to mimic guitar playing with his hands. Suddenly, he said, the airbags deployed, though he claimed not to know if he had hit a person.

But the complaint says he went on to make a statement that he was “looking down and jamming out a bit and next thing you know I hit somebody. He also allegedly said his cruise control was set at 52 mph in the posted 40 mph zone.

Officers at the scene suspected alcohol impairment, and while the preliminary test came in below the limit, a search warrant was obtained for a blood draw. The sample was sent to the Minnesota Bureau of Criminal Apprehension, where results are pending.

Carlton County Chief Deputy Dan Danielson credited staff at the nearby Minnesota Correctional Facility for providing “significant assistance by notifying the Sheriff’s Office and (Moose Lake) Police Department of the incident, identifying the driver responsible for striking Mr. McNeil as well as attempting immediate life-saving measures in an attempt to revive Mr. McNeil until medical, fire and law enforcement staff arrived.”

Keranen is charged with a felony count of criminal vehicular homicide for causing a death while operating a motor vehicle in a grossly negligent manner.

Court records indicate Karenen was convicted of violating the state’s hands-free cellphone driving law in Chisago County earlier this year, as well as driving 95 mph in a 60 mph zone in Itasca County last year.

Judge Rebekka Stumme ordered a $250,000 bond or $25,000 cash option for unconditional release. She also set a $150,000 bond or $15,000 cash option with conditions.

Keranen was released from the Carlton County Jail on Friday night after arraignment. He is scheduled to make another court appearance Monday, April 1.

Related Articles

Crime & Public Safety |


Genealogy research links Winona woman to newborn found dead in Mississippi River

Crime & Public Safety |


Girl, 6, struck by car in St. Paul on Saturday being treated for non-life-threatening injuries

Crime & Public Safety |


Detectives investigating death after man found on St. Paul sidewalk

Crime & Public Safety |


Teen pleads guilty in murder case that Minnesota’s attorney general took away from local prosecutor

Crime & Public Safety |


St. Paul mother gives emotional statement before sentencing for daughter’s fentanyl death

Mifepristone access is coming before the US Supreme Court. How safe is this abortion pill?

posted in: News | 0

By LAURA UNGAR and MATTHEW PERRONE (Associated Press)

The U.S. Supreme Court will take up a case Tuesday that could impact how women get access to mifepristone, one of the two pills used in the most common type of abortion in the nation.

The central dispute in the case is whether the Food and Drug Administration overlooked serious safety problems when it made mifepristone easier to obtain, including through mail-order pharmacies.

Legal briefs filed with the court describe the pill’s safety in vastly different terms: Medical professionals call it “among the safest medications” ever approved by the FDA, while the Christian conservative group suing the agency attributes “tens of thousands” of “emergency complications” to the drug.

Earlier this year, a medical journal retracted two studies that claimed to show the harms of mifepristone. The studies were cited in the pivotal Texas court ruling that brought the matter before the Supreme Court. The publisher cited conflicts of interest by the authors and flaws in their research, although the studies’ lead author called the retractions a baseless attack.

Here’s what to know about the safety of mifepristone, which is typically used with misoprostol in a medication abortion.

What safety limits has the FDA imposed since 2000?

The FDA approved mifepristone in 2000 as a safe and effective way to end early pregnancies.

There are rare occasions when mifepristone can cause dangerous, excessive bleeding that requires emergency care. Because of that, the FDA imposed strict safety limits on who could prescribe and distribute it — only specially certified physicians and only as part of three mandatory in-person appointments with the patient getting the drug.

The doctors also had to be capable of performing emergency surgery to stop excess bleeding and an abortion procedure if the drug didn’t end the pregnancy.

Over the years, the FDA reaffirmed mifepristone’s safety and repeatedly eased restrictions, culminating in a 2021 decision doing away with any in-person requirements and allowing the pill to be sent through the mail.

How often are there serious problems?

Abortion opponents say the more lax restrictions resulted in many more “emergency complications.” But that argument lumps together women experiencing a range of issues with mifepristone — from the drug not working to people who may simply have questions or concerns but don’t require medical care.

OB-GYNs say a tiny fraction of patients suffer “major” or “serious” adverse events after taking mifepristone.

A legal brief by a group of medical organizations including the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists says: “When used in medication abortion, major adverse events — significant infection, excessive blood loss, or hospitalization — occur in less than 0.32% of patients, according to a highly regarded study with more than 50,000 patients.”

The definition that scientists generally use for serious adverse events includes blood transfusions, major surgery, hospital admissions and death, said Ushma Upadhyay, one of the authors of that 2015 study. She added: “The hospital admission is a catch-all for the very serious but more rare events such as major infection.”

The prescribing information included in the packaging for mifepristone tablets lists slightly different statistics for what it calls “serious adverse reactions.” It cites ranges for how frequently various complications occur: 0.03% to 0.5% for transfusion; 0.2% for sepsis and 0.04% to 0.6% for hospitalization related to medication abortions. The ranges reflect findings across various relevant studies, experts said.

Why do patients go to the emergency room?

Mifepristone’s labeling also lists a complication that most medical groups don’t consider a serious or major adverse event: ER visits, which ranged from 2.9% to 4.6%. The current FDA label lists going to the ER as an option if patients experience prolonged heavy bleeding, severe abdominal pain or a sustained fever.

But ER visits don’t always reflect big problems, doctors told The Associated Press.

Some people may go there after a medication abortion because they want to be checked out or have questions but don’t have a doctor, said Upadhyay, a professor at the University of California, San Francisco. Others, she said, “don’t want to go to their primary care provider about their abortion” because of stigma.

study she co-authored in 2018 found that slightly more than half of patients who visited the ER because of abortions received only observational care. Some, Upadhyay said, “don’t receive any treatment.”

How effective is the pill?

Mifepristone results in a completed abortion 97.4% of the time, according to U.S. studies cited in the FDA label.

But in 2.6% of cases, a surgical intervention is needed. And 0.7% of the time, the pregnancy continues.

That’s compared to a procedural abortion in a clinic, where the chance of the procedure failing to end a pregnancy “is extremely, extremely low,” probably less than 0.1%, said Dr. Pratima Gupta, a board member for the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.

“Any time a procedural abortion is done, the clinicians ensure that it was a complete abortion” by examining the tissue that is removed or performing an ultrasound during or after the procedure, she said.

Gupta, who has done abortion procedures for more than 20 years, said there are “very few complications from abortion — any kind of abortion, medication or procedural abortion.” A recent study suggests that’s just as true for medication abortions that happen in a clinic, a doctor’s office or at home with the help of telehealth.

How does mifepristone’s safety and effectiveness compare to other drugs?

The FDA makes drug approval decisions on a case-by-case basis, weighing effectiveness, safety and other factors.

No drug is 100% effective, and many common medications don’t work for a significant portion of patients.

Related Articles

Health |


Kate and William ‘extremely moved’ by support since the Princess of Wales’ cancer revelation

Health |


State issues fish consumption advisory for Mississippi River from St. Paul Park to Wabasha

Health |


Health workers fear it’s profits before protection as CDC revisits airborne transmission

Health |


Doctors urge refrigerating acne creams to reduce cancer risk

Health |


1 in 5 maternal deaths are from suicide. Why is it so hard to get help?

Antidepressants typically help between 40% and 60% of people with depression. New antibiotics approved by the FDA often resolve about 70% of infections.

Since 2000, roughly 6 million patients have taken mifepristone, according to the FDA. A 2021 review of agency records looking for deaths that were likely related to the drug identified 13, or .00027% of patients.

Medical organizations supporting mifepristone’s availability say the drug’s safety — given the rate of deaths — compares to “ibuprofen, which more than 30 million Americans take in any given day.”

The Associated Press Health and Science Department receives support from the Howard Hughes Medical Institute’s Science and Educational Media Group. The AP is solely responsible for all content.

Parts of William O’Brien State Park to be closed for construction until 2025

posted in: News | 0

An improvement project to increase accessibility for visitors has begun at William O’Brien State Park. The lower portion of the park surrounding Lake Alice, including the Riverside Group Camp, Riverway Campground and all areas east of Minnesota Highway 95 will be closed through early 2025.

The construction will add accessible campsites, a canoe and kayak launch, trail upgrades to better accommodate wheelchairs and other mobility devices and new restrooms and shower facilities.

The majority of the park will remain open during construction, including most of the park’s 17.4 miles of hiking trails, the main office and multiple of the campsites. In addition to the Riverway campground and group camp, other areas that will be closed include the Mondale Day Use Area, which encompasses the St. Croix River public water access and Lake Alice swimming beach.

“The Minnesota DNR is constantly working to make our state park system more accessible, and this project is a key advancement in our efforts to ensure Minnesotans of all abilities can enjoy our state’s outdoor experiences,” said Ann Pierce, director of the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources Parks and Trails Division, in a statement.

The project, in development for several years, is being funded primarily through state bonding funds, with additional money raised by the 2023  Get Out MORE (Modernize Outdoor Recreation Experiences) appropriation.

Construction updates will be available on the William O’Brien State Park webpage of the DNR website.

Related Articles

Outdoors |


State issues fish consumption advisory for Mississippi River from St. Paul Park to Wabasha

Outdoors |


Airplane ‘sounded much lower than it should have been.’ NTSB releases preliminary report on fatal Afton crash.

Outdoors |


Arne Carlson criticizes Stillwater delay in notification regarding PFAS contamination

Outdoors |


Stillwater: Historic Courthouse reopens after $4.5M makeover

Outdoors |


Forest Lake woman organizes Vietnam veterans program one last time before passing torch