What role will housing affordability play in 2024 election?

posted in: News | 0

Matt Reynolds | (TNS) The Atlanta Journal-Constitution

ATLANTA — Law student Aundria Towns and her partner, health care worker Hayden Herrick, have a household income of more than $100,000. Pre-pandemic, those earnings might have given the Douglas County, Georgia, couple a pick of houses.

Not in 2024.

Weighed down by student loans, $2,000-a-month rent, stubbornly high interest rates and soaring house prices, the couple has put their plans to buy a house in Cobb County on hold. At least for the time being.

“It seems so out of reach. It seems almost impossible,” Towns told The Atlanta Journal-Constitution.

That is a sentiment shared by millions of Americans struggling to get into starter homes, make rent, or upscale or downsize as the country prepares for the 2024 general election. Although concerns about inflation, food and gas prices are top of voters’ minds, housing is another pain point contributing to unease about the economy.

According to the national real estate brokerage company Redfin, about 53% of homeowners and renters said in February that the cost of housing will impact their pick for president.

“For so many Americans, the rest of the economy is doing well,” Redfin’s chief economist Daryl Fairweather said. “But people still feel like they aren’t economically successful. They can’t own a home, and homeownership is more unaffordable than it’s ever been.”

The issue has been noticed in the White House, where President Joe Biden has made housing a priority as he eyes a second term and prepares to go head-to-head in a debate this Thursday with former president Donald Trump in Atlanta.

Meanwhile, Trump has said he would tackle the housing shortage by cutting energy costs and interest rates to fuel the construction of new homes. Recently, his campaign has blamed illegal immigration for contributing to the high cost of housing, claiming people living in the country without permission are making the housing shortage worse.

Regardless of Trump’s position, the poor perception of the economy and the high cost of housing could imperil incumbents. But Biden’s message on housing affordability, which includes building more homes and providing relief to first-time buyers and renters, is likely to resonate with those down-ballot races in the battleground state of Georgia, according to Jonesboro Democrat and State Senator Gail Davenport.

Davenport is running unopposed this year in a redrawn district that includes parts of Clayton and Henry counties. But she says she often gets calls from voters shaken by rising home and rent prices.

“A lot of people don’t want to say it but it’s a housing crisis,” she said. “Everything out there is $300,000 or $350,000. A lot of people see that as not being affordable.”

‘We’re stuck’

After years of inertia, conservative lawmakers have joined liberals at the national, state and local levels in recognizing there is a housing affordability crisis and are doing something about it. And for the first time in decades, housing could be a major issue during a presidential campaign.

In Georgia, housing advocates have often lamented the slow progress made on safe and affordable housing. But this year, Gov. Brian Kemp signed into law the Safe at Home Act, which provides modest protections for people renting neglected homes. The legislature preserved the state’s low income housing tax credit after lawmakers proposed a bill, House Bill 1182, to cut it. The credit is currently the only state funding to create or preserve affordable housing for low-income Georgians, according to advocates. After the passage of the Safe at Home Act, they now have sights on repealing Georgia’s ban on rent control.

Nationally, Biden has narrowed his focus on housing policy during his State of the Union address in March. His budget for the fiscal year 2025 proposes investing $258 billion to build or preserve two million more homes — though some studies suggest that is not nearly enough to close the gap.

He proposed a $10,000 tax credit to help middle-income homebuyers trying to get into their first home and for people who sell their starter homes, and $25,000 in down payment assistance.

But Atlanta realtor Maura Neill said it is beyond the scope of national politicians to make housing more affordable in Atlanta and Georgia. She said she would have more faith that someone running for city council, the county commission or state legislature could tackle a problem which includes local zoning and permitting hurdles.

“I would be really wary of someone who’s running for national office who promises me that they’re going to fix housing affordability because they’re not here in Atlanta or in Alpharetta, or here in Roswell with boots on the ground” she said.

Nevertheless, housing is an issue among the voters Biden will need to win over if he wants to take the battleground state, including Democratic-heavy Clayton County.

Voting right activists told the AJC in May that votes shouldn’t be taken for granted in the county and that housing is a burning issue. They suggested that U.S. senators in the state might have heeded the warning. In May, U.S. Sens. Raphael Warnock and Jon Ossoff committed $500,000 in federal funding for a Habitat for Humanity development called Hannah Springs in Lovejoy. The same month, the senators jointly announced $80 million in investments in housing authorities across the state.

Though it still pales in comparison to cities like New York and Los Angeles, the median home list price in metro Atlanta rose 30% between May 2019 and May 2024, according to Zillow data, and the supply of new housing is not meeting demand, particularly in the metro area, where population growth has outpaced construction.

According to real-estate marketplace company Zillow, the average home price in Atlanta in May was almost $400,000. People buying a home in the U.S. need to make about $114,000 a year to buy the typical house, according to a March report by Redfin. That is 35% more than the median household income of $84,000.

Biden knows he must convince Black voters to win nationally and in Georgia, and the housing crisis may have hit that constituency hardest. Although metro Atlanta has the highest rate of Black home ownership among the most populous cities in the US, the home ownership rate is 25 percentage points lower than the white home ownership rate. The gap is almost 30 percentage points in Cobb and Gwinnett and almost 25 percentage points in Clayton, according to the Atlanta Regional Commission.

Median rents in Atlanta are hovering around $2,100 a month. Earlier this year, the Harvard Joint Center for Housing Studies published a rental housing report suggesting that almost half of all renters are cost-burdened; meaning more than 30% of their income goes towards rent and utilities.

Sigrid Pearson lives in a two-bedroom apartment in Atlanta and pays $1,200 a month. Working two jobs as a cleaner and cashier, she earns less than $20 an hour, spending about half of her income on rent.

“I can barely afford $1,200,” she told the AJC earlier this year. “I’m going to have to downsize because it’s getting too expensive. They raise the rent every year.”

Jim Parrott, Barack Obama’s policy advisor and a non-resident fellow at the Urban Institute’s Housing Financing Policy Center, said he expects housing to be a running theme of the 2024 campaign. He said the issue could impact state and local races in Georgia, especially if Biden’s campaign surrogates adopt housing as a talking point.

“We’re stuck. They [voters] can see that in two, three months, gas prices may be down, the price of milk may be down but they can see housing is not going to be down,” he said.

The challenges in Georgia for both renters and homebuyers are worsened by Wall Street investment in housing, according to some housing experts. Since the Great Recession of 2008, Greater Atlanta has become ground zero for institutional investment with corporations buying up thousands of single-family homes.

Towns said she is competing for homes in a market where inventory is already stretched thin.

“It’s not leaving a lot out there for people to have options,” she said.

Hurting incumbents

Parrott said it’s difficult to predict how much Trump will make housing a campaign issue. But the former landlord and real estate’s mogul’s first term in office offers some hints on how he could approach housing, if he is reelected.

His administration was hostile towards the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, installing Ben Carson, who had no experience in housing, to head the agency. Trump proposed painful cuts to federal affordable housing programs for low-income people and wanted to slash housing benefits. Each time, Congress rejected the proposals, according to the American Bar Association.

Trump discriminated against tenants when he was a landlord, added Porshalain White, Georgia state director for the Biden campaign.

“While Trump’s housing agenda would cut opportunities for home ownership for Black Georgians and make housing more expensive, President Biden and Vice President Harris have made tackling corporate greed and lowering costs a priority, and have proposed the boldest plan in a generation to lower housing costs and boost the housing supply,” White said in a statement.

Campaign spokeswoman Karoline Leavitt said Trump planned to fight illegal immigration, which she said was taking up available homes and driving up housing costs, and free up federal land for new construction. Campaign officials did not back up the claim on immigration and housing with research but said that it was “commonsense” that the millions of people without documentation are a factor in the increased demand for housing.

“On top of sky-high prices for rent, gas, and groceries, Bidenomics has made the American Dream of homeownership unreachable for young Americans and families across the country,” Leavitt wrote in an emailed statement.

It remains to be seen whether Biden’s proposals will be enough to persuade voters otherwise. Fairweather, of Redfin, said that one of the reasons people might have soured on the president could be rooted in housing.

“I think Biden is trying to change that sentiment by putting out policy and trying to paint himself as the person who’s going to solve the problem,” Fairweather said.

Judd Cramer is co-author of a National Bureau of Economic Research paper that attempted to unravel the mystery of why consumer sentiment about the economy was so negative with unemployment low and inflation falling.

The paper, published in February, suggested it could be explained, at least in part, by high borrowing costs.

“Home prices are up almost 50 percent since the start of the pandemic, while the 30-year mortgage rate has tripled since the historic lows of 2021,” the paper states. “Given that home prices remain at historic highs despite higher interest rates, the interest payment on a new 30-year mortgage for the average house has increased more than threefold since 2021.”

Cramer said voters in Atlanta and Georgia, just like voters in every other part of the country, know how difficult it is to buy a home right now. Not that long ago, rates were 3%. Now, they’re more than 7%.

“Nobody thinks it’s a good time to buy a home and I think that’s something that will certainly be hurting incumbents,” Cramer said.

Davenport agrees housing affordability is an issue that runs deep.

“No matter where you live or where your district lands, people in Georgia want a good quality of life. That trickles down to healthcare, education, jobs, the economy, and also housing,” she said.

For voters like Towns, the issue goes far beyond national politics. She said she would like to see more local officials advocating for affordable housing. When asked about who she would vote for, Towns demurred. But housing affordability will still be on her mind come November.

“I wish all parties would come together and see that there is a housing crisis,” Towns said. “I don’t know exactly who I’m going to vote for. I do know that it is a topic of discussion in our home.”

Biden claims an early debate win: RFK Jr.’s absence from stage

posted in: News | 0

Josh Wingrove | (TNS) Bloomberg News

President Joe Biden’s campaign already sees one victory from the upcoming debate with Donald Trump — the absence of third-party challenger Robert F. Kennedy Jr. from the stage.

Kennedy and other independent presidential contenders failed to meet the criteria to qualify for Thursday’s debate in Atlanta, according to host CNN, boosting Biden’s efforts to cast the 2024 race as a two-person contest between him and Trump.

The showdown comes as Biden looks to shore up the broad electoral coalition he’ll need to defeat Trump and his fervent conservative base. Some polls find Biden performing better against Trump head-to-head than in surveys where voters are presented with a larger pool of candidates, making it crucial for the Democrat to minimize the risk of his support draining away to outside challengers.

Biden’s team has sought to hammer the message that voters face a binary choice in November.

“It is Joe Biden or Donald Trump, and anyone that does anything but vote for Joe Biden is supporting Donald Trump,” Biden campaign chair Jen O’Malley Dillon said on a Puck podcast this week.

“There’s just one choice, and it’s before you on this stage,” she added.

A campaign adviser, speaking on condition of anonymity to discuss strategy, said they plan to use the debate to spur supporters to speak with undecided family and friends about their vote.

Kennedy has blasted CNN and the two major-party campaigns for his exclusion, claiming he met the debate criteria. “My exclusion by Presidents Biden and Trump from the debate is undemocratic, un-American, and cowardly,” he said in a statement.

Kennedy on Thursday plans to answer the same questions posed to Biden and Trump in a livestream concurrent with the televised main event.

The challenge posed by independents like Kennedy, Cornel West and Jill Stein won’t be neutralized by their failure to appear on the debate stage. The election could well be decided by just tens of thousands of votes scattered across as few as three battleground states, making the third parties potential spoilers.

Polls show Kennedy drawing from Biden and Trump voters in roughly equal measure, and both major-party campaigns have sought to discredit him among their supporters — while also trying to make him more appealing to the other side.

Indeed, the core of Kennedy’s support comes from so-called “double haters” — voters holding unfavorable opinions of both Biden and Trump. About three in 10 battleground-state voters who say they won’t vote for either major-party candidate would vote for Kennedy if he were an option, according to a Bloomberg News/Morning Consult poll last month.

Democrats have been engaged in a feverish push to keep Kennedy, a scion of one of their most famous dynasties, off ballots. Biden has touted the endorsements of other Kennedy family members to sideline his rival, the best polling independent in the U.S. in decades.

Trump has also intensified his attacks, casting Kennedy as a “Democratic plant.” Kennedy’s opposition to vaccine mandates, skepticism of gun-control measures and crusade against tech companies he accuses of censorship, align him closely with much of Trump’s base.

“I’d love to have him in the debate, but he’s got bad numbers,” Trump said earlier this month at a rally, claiming he and Biden would equally lose votes. “Kennedy probably takes 50-50, but he’s a fake,” Trump added.

The Kennedy campaign says it has filed to get on the ballot in 24 states totaling 348 electoral votes — more than the 270 needed to have a theoretical chance at winning the Electoral College. But his campaign remains mired in legal challenges in several of those states.

Kennedy also lags far behind the major-party candidates in fundraising, but got a boost by selecting Silicon Valley lawyer and philanthropist Nicole Shanahan as his running mate. Shanahan, the ex-wife of Google co-founder Sergey Brin, contributed $8 million to their campaign in April, taking advantage of federal law allowing candidates to donate unlimited amounts to support their own candidacy.

An AARP poll, released earlier this month, found Trump leading Biden among voters of all ages by 47% to 45% head-to-head. But in a wider field, Kennedy has 11% support, boosting Trump to a five-point edge over Biden at 42% to 37%.

Voters under age 50 are the likeliest to back third-party candidates, including 25% of voters 18 to 34, the poll found. Young voters were crucial to Biden’s 2020 victory but he faces the risk of weakened support fueled by disappointment over his handling of the Israel-Hamas war and other issues.

“Between Trump and Biden, right now, it’s a bigger threat to Biden,” pollster Bob Ward of Fabrizio Ward, LLC, which helped conduct the survey.

Another AARP pollster, John Anzalone, who also surveys for Biden’s campaign, cautioned it is still early and that billions in advertising will have an impact on the race.

On Thursday, Biden intends to outline his second-term agenda and highlight the contrast with Trump to frame the race as a choice between the two, O’Malley Dillon said.

“Him standing next to Donald Trump is the best way to show that,” she said.

——-

(With assistance from Gregory Korte and Stephanie Lai.)

___

©2024 Bloomberg L.P. Visit bloomberg.com. Distributed by Tribune Content Agency, LLC.

The Supreme Court seems poised to allow emergency abortions in Idaho, a Bloomberg News report says

posted in: Adventure | 0

By LINDSAY WHITEHURST

WASHINGTON (AP) — The Supreme Court appears poised to allow emergency abortions in Idaho when a pregnant patient’s health is at serious risk, according to Bloomberg News, which said a copy of the opinion briefly posted Wednesday on the court’s website.

The document suggests the court will conclude that it should not have gotten involved in the case so quickly and will reinstate a court order that had allowed hospitals in the state to perform emergency abortions to protect a pregnant patient’s health, Bloomberg said. The document was quickly removed from the website.

The Supreme Court acknowledged that a document was inadvertently posted Wednesday.

“The Court’s Publications Unit inadvertently and briefly uploaded a document to the Court’s website. The Court’s opinion in Moyle v. United States and Idaho v. United States will be issued in due course,” court spokeswoman Patricia McCabe said in a statement.

The case would continue at the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals if the high court dismisses proceedings.

The finding may not be the court’s final ruling, since it has not been officially released.

The Biden administration had sued Idaho, arguing that hospitals must provide abortions to stabilize pregnant patients in rare emergency cases when their health is at serious risk.

Most Republican-controlled states began enforcing restrictions after the court overturned Roe v. Wade two years ago.

Idaho is among 14 states that outlaw abortion at all stages of pregnancy with very limited exceptions. It said that its ban does allow abortions to save a pregnant patient’s life and federal law doesn’t require the exceptions to expand.

The Supreme Court had previously allowed the measure to go into effect, even in medical emergencies, while the case played out. Several women have since needed medical airlifts out of state in cases in which abortion is routine treatment to avoid infection, hemorrhage and other dire health risks, Idaho doctors have said.

The high court’s eventual ruling is expected to have ripple effects on emergency care in other states with strict abortion bans. Already, reports of pregnant women being turned away from U.S. emergency rooms spiked following the high court’s 2022 ruling overturning the constitutional right to abortion, according to federal documents obtained by The Associated Press.

The Justice Department’s lawsuit came under a federal law that requires hospitals accepting Medicare to provide stabilizing care regardless of a patient’s ability to pay. It’s called the Emergency Medical Treatment and Labor Act, or EMTALA.

Nearly all hospitals accept Medicare, so emergency room doctors in Idaho and other states with bans would have to provide abortions if needed to stabilize a pregnant patient and avoid serious health risks like loss of reproductive organs, the Justice Department argued.

Idaho argued that its exception for a patient’s life covers dire health circumstances and that the Biden administration misread the law to circumvent the state ban and expand abortion access.

Doctors have said that Idaho’s law has made them fearful to perform abortions, even when a pregnancy is putting a patient’s health severely at risk. The law requires anyone who is convicted of performing an abortion to be imprisoned for at least two years.

A federal judge initially sided with the Democratic administration and ruled that abortions were legal in medical emergencies. After the state appealed, the Supreme Court allowed the law to go fully into effect in January.

___

Dakota County board picks final two candidates for new county manager

posted in: News | 0

The Dakota County Board of Commissioners has narrowed down two candidates who could fill the county’s top role.

Following Monday’s interviews with the five semifinalists, the Board of Commissioners identified Heidi Welsch and Justin Miller as the final candidates for county manager, said Mary Beth Schubert, director of communications for the county, on Wednesday.

As the top role in the county, the county manager oversees operations and collects a salary in the ballpark of $234,000, according to the county.

Welsch has been in her current position as Olmstead County administrator for the past seven years and previously served as the county’s deputy administrator for eight months. Welsch also worked for Dakota County as the manager of the Office of Planning and Analysis for six years and as the deputy director of Employment and Economic Assistance for two years.

Miller, who has held the title of Lakeville city administrator for over nine years, also served as the city administrator for Mendota Heights for three years, city administrator for Falcon Heights for more than five years and as the assistant city manager and assistant to the city manager for Chanhassen for four years.

The role of manager was vacated last month following the retirement of former manager Matt Smith, who held the role for eight years.

During his time with the county, Smith managed a team of more than 2,000 employees as the county earned state and national recognition for its services, improved mental health crisis programs, enhanced park and library amenities and helped to facilitate the county’s COVID-19 response, according to a county news release.

“This has been a great opportunity, but at some point, you need to step back and let someone else take over, and this is the time,” Smith told the Pioneer Press earlier this year.

The board will invite back the two candidates for a second round of interviews on July 9 when a decision is expected to be made, Schubert said.

Related Articles

Local News |


St. Paul firefighter found, receiving treatment, after going missing from South St. Paul residence

Local News |


After baby book stolen from vehicle in St. Paul, ‘miracle’ returns it to family

Local News |


Blue Cross Blue Shield site in Eagan changes hands

Local News |


Charges: Off-duty St. Paul officer detains tip-jar thief while dad calls 911 during Father’s Day steakhouse dinner

Local News |


Rosemount teen sentenced to juvenile facility for throwing punch at Harriet Island that killed Vietnam vet