When Local Police Collaborate with ICE, Children Pay the Price

posted in: All news | 0

Editor’s Note: The author of this article is currently one of eight Democrats running in the March 3 primary for state House District 49, the seat vacated by gubernatorial candidate Gina Hinojosa. You can read more about the candidates here.

I grew up undocumented in this country. From an early age, I learned how fear can live quietly inside a child. I learned to listen for sirens, notice unfamiliar cars, and worry whether a normal school day would end with my family separated. For many undocumented children and their parents, life is not defined by safety or stability, but by vigilance.

That is why what we are witnessing today is so alarming and so familiar. Children are once again being used as political footballs, caught in the crosshairs of immigration enforcement designed to intimidate rather than protect.

The world now knows the name of Liam Conejo Ramos, the five-year-old apprehended by Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) in Minneapolis. But let’s bring this closer to home.  Last month, right here in Austin, 26-year-old Karen Gutiérrez Castellanos, a Honduran national, and her 5-year-old were deported after Austin police alerted Immigration and Customs Enforcement following a 911 call reporting a disturbance in Southwest Austin. An Austin police officer identified an administrative warrant in a federal database and contacted ICE. Soon both mother and child were detained and removed from the country.

Let that sink in. A call for help triggered a chain of events that ended with the deportation of a mother and her U.S. citizen child. This is not public safety. This is a system that punishes families for seeking help and turns local police into extensions of federal immigration enforcement.

I know exactly what messages moments like this send to children. They learn that calling 911 is dangerous. They learn that police are not there to protect them. They learn that even citizenship does not guarantee safety when your family is undocumented. And they learn, most devastatingly, that they are disposable.

Research on child development is unequivocal: Children need safety, routine, and trust to develop socially, emotionally, and cognitively. When those foundations are shattered, children shift into survival mode. Anxiety interferes with learning. Fear disrupts memory and attention. Emotional regulation becomes harder. Long-term trauma becomes more likely.

I lived that reality. In school, my mind was often divided—half focused on the lesson, half bracing for loss. I struggled to concentrate not because I lacked intelligence or motivation, but because fear hijacks a developing brain. That kind of hypervigilance might help a child endure uncertainty, but it comes at a cost: Curiosity shrinks, confidence erodes, and joy becomes conditional.

When children witness classmates detained, hear about neighbors deported, or watch a parent disappear after a routine interaction with police, the damage ripples outward. Entire communities retreat into silence. Parents avoid schools. Families stop reporting crimes. Children carry fear into classrooms that are supposed to be places of learning and growth.

This is why Austin must take a stand. Austin should not collaborate with ICE. Doing so does not make us safer, it makes our communities less safe. When local governments entangle themselves with immigration enforcement, trust collapses. Public safety suffers. And children pay the highest price.

The case of Karen Gutiérrez Castellanos and her daughter is not an isolated incident; it shows how easily a moment of vulnerability can turn into permanent family separation. It shows how policies on paper translate into trauma in real life.

This is not about partisan politics. It is about whether we believe children deserve protection or punishment. It is about whether we allow fear to guide policy, even when it harms the most vulnerable among us.

Kids should never be used to send political messages. And they should never have to wonder whether asking for help will cost them their family. If we truly care about safety, learning, and community well-being, we must reject collaboration with ICE and center policies that protect families—not tear them apart.

Our children deserve nothing less.

The post When Local Police Collaborate with ICE, Children Pay the Price appeared first on The Texas Observer.

During immigration enforcement surge, St. Paul Council introduces ordinance barring officer face coverings

posted in: All news | 0

With many federal officers wearing face coverings during an immigration enforcement surge in Minnesota, the St. Paul City Council on Wednesday introduced an ordinance requiring law enforcement to be unmasked.

The city council has said they’re taking a phased approached to introducing a series of ordinances in response to the enforcement, and Wednesday’s was the third brought forward in as many weeks.

The city council discussion began after an Immigration and Customs Enforcement operation on Nov. 25 on Rose Avenue near Payne Avenue. St. Paul police said they were called to assist as protesters gathered. They used chemical irritants and less-lethal munitions, which drew criticism from all city council members and community members.

Since then, “federal immigration enforcement tactics have changed rapidly,” the city council said in a statement on Jan. 21. “As a result, residents and the City cannot wait for a single comprehensive update to the City’s existing separation ordinance. … The Council’s phased approach allows swifter action while providing stronger legal protection for ordinance changes.”

The city council unanimously approved on Wednesday an ordinance introduced on Jan. 21 to prohibit law enforcement from staging on city-owned property for federal immigration enforcement and to limit access to non-public spaces. It will take effect 30 days after publication.

Face masking, identification

An ordinance introduced by the council last week would require law enforcement officers to have the name of their law enforcement agency on the outermost layer of their uniform. It would also require either a name or badge number, or both, on the uniform.

Another ordinance brought forward Wednesday by the city council says a law enforcement officer “shall not wear a face covering … that conceals or obscures their facial identity in the performance of law enforcement duties.” There will be a public hearing on the matter during the city council’s meeting next Wednesday and the council will likely vote on it Feb. 18.

The city council says in the proposed ordinance that “the routine and ubiquitous use of facial coverings by law enforcement officers has a significant and unquestioned impact on public safety, including: implications for public perception, officer-community interactions, and accountability, and increases the risk of impersonation by unauthorized individuals.”

There are exemptions in the masking and identification requirements for undercover operations and, in the face-covering ordinance, when “protective gear is required for physical safety.”

California passed laws last year that ban federal law enforcement from wearing masks and require visible identification, which led to the U.S. Justice Department to file a federal lawsuit.

“Law enforcement officers risk their lives every day to keep Americans safe, and they do not deserve to be doxed or harassed simply for carrying out their duties,” Attorney General Pam Bondi said in a statement in November.

St. Paul City Council Member Anika Bowie said Wednesday she’s aware of legal challenges that masking bans have faced.

“But I think the biggest risk right now is making sure that our neighbors feel safe,” she said, adding they’re not tolerating “anyone to come into our neighborhoods and not show their face.”

Separation ordinance not yet taken up

Two St. Paul residents who testified at a public hearing Wednesday about the identification requirement urged the city council to make exemptions as specific as possible to avoid potential loopholes.

John Benda, co-chair of the Minnesota Interfaith Coalition on Immigration, said he was present during the ICE operations in St. Paul in November at Bro-Tex Inc. and on Rose Avenue.

“I am disappointed that it’s taken this long for the City Council to get around to making some changes,” he said, but thanked the council for the actions they’re taking now. “… We’d like to see the council work within different levels of government and influence … them to do everything in their power to advocate for protections from ICE in our hospitals, schools, daycares and churches.”

The new ordinances introduced in St. Paul have not been part of the city’s separation ordinance, which was enacted in 2004 and “establishes a clear line of separation between the actions of local law enforcement and those of federal immigration authorities.”

The city council said in its statement last month that it would consider “key updates” to the city’s separation ordinance at the Feb. 4 meeting, but they did not come up Wednesday.

Related Articles


Minnesota school districts, teachers union sue to block immigration enforcement near schools


Government lawyer yanked from immigration detail in Minnesota after telling judge ‘this job sucks’


The hospitality stop known as ‘Ice House’ is now the ‘Winter House’ for US athletes


Here’s how to support small businesses in Twin Cities impacted by ICE surge


Trump’s border czar is pulling 700 immigration officers out of Minnesota immediately

City Council President Rebecca Noecker said the issue has been that the U.S. Department of Justice in September filed a federal lawsuit against the state of Minnesota, the Minnesota Attorney General’s Office, the cities of St. Paul and Minneapolis, Hennepin County and the Hennepin County Sheriff’s Office over so-called “sanctuary city” policies that it alleges interfere with federal immigration enforcement. The lawsuit is ongoing.

“What we are trying to do is find a way to strengthen it without endangering it wholesale,” Noecker said. “The concern from our attorneys is that any changes open us up to legal risk in that lawsuit.”

The council said in its statement last month that it would consider updates to its separation ordinance, including strengthening training and reporting requirements related to the ordinance; clarifying that the city’s policy is to not assist ICE or employ crowd control tactics during ICE operations; and clarifying that nothing in the ordinance prevents public safety officials from responding to calls for aid from St. Paul residents in the presence of ICE.

Timberwolves: Could Mike Conley be back soon? A path exists

posted in: All news | 0

Perhaps Mike Conley’s departure will be short lived.

While a return is far from guaranteed, the pathway to one opened on Wednesday, a day after the Timberwolves dealt Conley to Chicago as part of a three-team deal that brought Minnesota nothing more than cash considerations and salary cap relief.

Conley was then dealt to Charlotte in a move that also sent Coby White — a once rumored deadline acquisition for Minnesota — to the Hornets.

HOUSTON, TEXAS – JANUARY 16: Mike Conley #10 of the Minnesota Timberwolves walks to the locker room for half time during the game against the Houston Rockets at Toyota Center on January 16, 2026 in Houston, Texas. User expressly acknowledges and agrees that, by downloading and or using this photograph, User is consenting to the terms and conditions of the Getty Images License Agreement. (Photo by Kenneth Richmond/Getty Images)

Charlotte is reportedly likely to buy Conley out of his contract, which would allow the veteran guard to hit the free-agent market. And because another trade has taken place since Minnesota dealt him, Conley, 38, would be eligible to re-sign with the Wolves.

A lot has to happen between now and then for that to happen. First, Charlotte and Conley would need to reach their buyout agreement. Charlotte could still, in theory, find a trade partner for Conley between now and Thursday’s 3 p.m. deadline.

But if a buyout occurred, Minnesota would need to deem Conley as the best man to fill the team’s open roster spot. Other options will exist, such as guard Lonzo Ball, who was reportedly traded from Cleveland to Utah on Wednesday and is expected to be waived by the Jazz.

Further, Conley would need to deem Minnesota as the best place to spend the remainder of his season. The Timberwolves have interest in welcoming the guard back on what would certainly be a pro-rated minimum contract, as the initial trade was merely to shed the remainder of his $10 million annual salary.

Conley is in Minnesota at the moment waiting to uncover his next true NBA destination. There certainly would be value for the veteran guard in re-joining his familiar teammates and organization. He knows his role and fit within the roster, and could resume his pursuit of a championship while remaining at home with his family.

But Conley had already heard from other players around the NBA as of Wednesday and is likely to have options to join other contenders. He’s the type of well-respected veteran every team would love to have.

Conley will have to at least briefly weigh other options — point guard-needy teams like Houston or Denver could serve as potential landing spots — before making a determination. And Minnesota’s roster remains in flux until a trade for Milwaukee superstar Giannis Antetokounmpo does or doesn’t happen on Thursday.

But a return would certainly be welcomed by the Wolves’ current players and coaches. Minnesota assistant coach Pablo Prigioni tweeted Wednesday morning that Conley is a “great player, huge impact on our team and a fantastic person.”

Speaking with reporters in Toronto, Wolves center Rudy Gobert said Conley’s departure was “tough.”

“We all know, we’re all aware it’s a business and those things can happen,” Gobert said. “But when it does happen, it’s always tough. For me, Mike has been a guy that I have a tremendous amount of respect for, and friendship and love for. So, obviously, this morning, you’re on the bus and you see an empty seat, it hits you a little bit.”

Donte DiVincenzo said he’d most miss Conley’s ear, noting he was always someone you could talk to for comfortable, constructive dialogue.

Gobert said Conley has been the example guys have needed, because the team knew he was going to compete, be there for his teammates and do anything he could to win — which is exactly the team identity for which the Wolves aim.

“He’s a guy that I think has brought a lot to this culture and this team, and whether he’s here or not … everything he has brought doesn’t leave with him,” Gobert said. “Hopefully, when we lift that trophy in June, he’ll be a big reason why.”

Who knows, maybe he’ll even be on the stage, lifting it along with them.

Related Articles


A door has opened for Mike Conley to return to the Timberwolves


Timberwolves trade Mike Conley to Chicago. Is there more to come?


Timberwolves provide relief to lowly Grizzlies


A big star? A seventh man? Days dwindling for Timberwolves to improve roster


Anthony Edwards, Julius Randle lead Timberwolves to a 131-114 victory over the Grizzlies

A door has opened for Mike Conley to return to the Timberwolves

posted in: All news | 0

Perhaps Mike Conley’s departure will be short-lived?

While a return is far from guaranteed, the pathway to one opened Wednesday, one day after Conley was dealt to Chicago as part of a three-team deal that brought the Timberwolves nothing more than cash considerations and salary cap.

Conley was dealt to Charlotte in a move that also sent Coby White – a once rumored deadline acquistion for Minnesota – to the Hornets.

Charlotte is likely to buy Conley out of his contract, which would allow the veteran guard to hit the free-agent market. And, because another trade had taken place since Minnesota dealt the 38-year-old, Conley would be eligible to re-sign with the Wolves.

A lot has to happen between now and then. First, Charlotte and Conley would need to reach their buyout agreement. Then, Minnesota would need to deem Conley as the best man to fill the team’s open roster spot, and Conley would need to deem Minnesota as the best place to spend the remainder of his season.

The Timberwolves have interest in welcoming the guard back on what would surely be a pro-rated minimum contract, as the initial trade was merely to shed the remainder of his $10 million annual salary.

Conley is in Minnesota at the moment waiting for his next true destination. There certainly would be value for the veteran guard in re-joining his familiar teammates and organization in the joint pursuit of a championship, all while staying at home with his family.

Brooklyn Nets’ Jalen Wilson (22) defends Minnesota Timberwolves’ Mike Conley (10) during the first half of an NBA basketball game Monday, Nov. 3, 2025, at Barclays Center in New York. (AP Photo/Frank Franklin II)