How long will James Rodriguez be with Minnesota United?

posted in: All news | 0

James Rodriguez has officially joined Minnesota United.

The star midfielder arrived in St. Paul on Thursday and has signed a contract with the Loons through June, which will get the Colombian talisman to the FIFA World Cup. Then Minnesota United said it has a club option through the end of the MLS season in December 2026.

The former Real Madrid and Bayern Munich will be introduced by the Loons at a news conference Friday morning at Allianz Field.

“I’m very happy for this new chapter in my life,” Rodriguez said in a statement. “I hope to be at my best so I can bring joy to this city and to all of the people who are putting their faith in me. I’m looking forward to meeting all of the passionate Minnesota fans.”

Rodriguez, who is primarily known as James, will be the highest profile player ever to play for Minnesota United, surpassing the likes of Argentine Emanuel Reynoso, fellow countryman Darwin Quintero and others.

“James is a player whose quality, vision, and experience at the highest levels of the game are unquestioned,” Loons chief soccer officer Khaled El-Ahmad said in a statement. “We’re excited to add his creativity and football intelligence to our group. At the same time, this move is about collective strength — not about putting everything on one individual.”

Rodriguez, 34, has been without a team since leaving Mexico’s Club Leon in November and wants to be sharp for the international tournament hosted by the U.S., Mexico and Canada. His future in Minnesota after the World Cup appears yet to be determined.

FACT FOCUS: Trump says tariffs have created an economic miracle. The facts tell a different story

posted in: All news | 0

By PAUL WISEMAN and CHRISTOPHER RUGABER, AP Economics Writers

WASHINGTON (AP) — Looking back on the first year of his second term, President Donald Trump boasts that he has resurrected the American economy by imposing big import taxes on foreign products.

He made his case in a recent opinion piece in The Wall Street Journal, chiding the paper and critics, including mainstream economists, who predicted that tariffs would backfire, raising prices and threatening growth. “Instead,” the Republican president wrote, “they have created an American economic miracle.”

But the proof he offers is often off-base or wrong altogether.

Here’s a look at the facts around Trump’s assessment of tariffs:

CLAIM: “Just over one year ago, we were a ‘DEAD’ country. Now, we are the ‘HOTTEST” country anywhere in the world!’ ’’

THE FACTS: This is a standard statement from Trump. But the U.S. economy was hardly “dead’’ when Trump returned to office last year. And in Trump’s second term, it’s performed strongly — after getting off to a bumpy start.

In 2024, the last year of the Biden presidency, American gross domestic product grew 2.8%, adjusted for inflation, faster than any wealthy country in the world except Spain. It also expanded at a healthy rate from 2021 through 2023.

The numbers for all of 2025 aren’t out yet. But during the first three quarters of the year, Trump’s tariffs — or the threat of them — delivered mixed results for the American economy.

From January to March, U.S. GDP actually shrank for the first time in three years. The main culprit was easy to identify: a surge in imports, which are subtracted from GDP, as American companies rushed to buy foreign products before Trump could impose tariffs on them.

But growth rebounded in the second half of the year. From April through June, the economy expanded at a healthy 3.8% pace. And from July through September, it grew even faster — 4.4%. A big part of the surge was a drop in imports, likely reflecting Trump’s tariffs as well as the fact that importers had already stocked up at the start of the year. Strong consumer spending also drove economic growth.

Trump also likes point to solid gains in the U.S. stock market. He noted that stocks hit new highs 52 times in 2025. It’s true that the American stock market did well last year. But it underperformed many foreign stock markets. The benchmark S&P 500 index climbed 17% — a nice gain but short of a 71% surge in South Korea, 29% in Hong Kong, 26% in Japan, 22% in Germany and 21% in the United Kingdom.

CLAIM: “Annual core inflation for the past three months has dropped to just 1.4% — far lower than almost anyone, other than me, had predicted.”

THE FACTS: The president is using cherry-picked data to vastly exaggerate where inflation stands.

His figure for annual inflation in the past three months — which excludes the volatile food and energy prices — is low, but reflects data distorted by the government shutdown in October and November, which disrupted the government’s data collection and forced the agency that compiles the figures to plug in rough estimates in some categories that artificially lowered overall inflation.

Annual core inflation for the final six months of 2025 is higher at 2.6%. That is down from January 2025’s level but about where it was in October 2024. Overall, inflation has leveled off this year, and was 3% in September before the government shutdown, the same as it had been in January 2025.

It’s true that inflation hasn’t been as high as many economists worried it would be when Trump started rolling out tariffs last spring, but that is partly because many of the “Liberation Day” tariffs were withdrawn, reduced or riddled with exemptions. When Democrats won some high-profile elections last year by highlighting “affordability” concerns, the administration rolled back existing or planned tariffs on coffee, beef and kitchen cabinets, for example, a backhanded acknowledgment that the duties were raising prices.

The impact of tariffs can be more clearly seen in core goods prices, which also exclude food and energy. Before the pandemic, core goods costs typically barely rose — or even fell — each year, but last December they were 1.4% higher than a year earlier. That was the largest increase, outside the pandemic, since 2011.

Alberto Cavallo, an economist at Harvard and the author of a study on the impact of tariffs cited by Trump in his op-ed, has found that Trump’s tariffs have boosted overall inflation by roughly three-quarters of a percentage point.

CLAIM: “The data shows that the burden, or ‘incidence,’ of the tariffs has fallen overwhelmingly on foreign producers and middlemen, including large corporations that are not from the U.S. According to a recent study by the Harvard Business School, these groups are paying at least 80% of tariff costs.”

THE FACTS: The study Trump cited appears to conclude the opposite of what Trump claimed. Authored by Cavallo and two colleagues, it finds that “U.S. consumers were bearing roughly 43% of the tariff-induced border cost after seven months, with the remainder absorbed mostly by U.S. firms.” Cavallo said by email that import prices hadn’t fallen much, “which suggests foreign exporters did not reduce their pre-tariff prices enough to shoulder a large share of the burden.″

CLAIM: “We have slashed our monthly trade deficit by an astonishing 77%.”

THE FACTS: This claim involves more cherry-picking, reflecting the percentage drop from a very high trade deficit in January 2025, when the president took office, to a super-low deficit in October.

The story is more complicated than the president makes it. The trade deficit — the gap between what the U.S. sells other countries and what it buys from them — has actually risen since he returned to the White House.

From January through November in 2025, the U.S. accumulated a trade deficit of nearly $840 billion, up 4% from the same period of 2024. In the first three months of 2025, importers rushed to buy foreign products — before Trump could slap tariffs on them. After that, monthly trade deficits came in consistently lower than they were in 2024. But the January-March import surge was so big that the 2025 year-to-date trade deficit still exceeds 2024’s.

CLAIM: “I have successfully wielded the tariff tool to secure colossal Investments in America, like no other country has ever seen before. … In less than one year, we have secured commitments for more than $18 trillion, a number that is unfathomable to many.’’

THE FACTS: Trump did, in fact, use the tariff threat to pry investment commitments from America’s major trading partners. The European Union, for instance, pledged $600 billion over four years.

But Trump hasn’t said how he came up with $18 trillion. The White House has published a figure of $9.6 trillion, which includes private and public investment commitments from other countries.

Related Articles


Trump’s aggressive tactics force a reckoning between local leaders and Washington


Vance attends Olympic skating, then meets with Italian Prime Minister Meloni


Trump shares a racist video that depicts the Obamas as primates in a jungle


Iran and US hold indirect talks in Oman. America’s military leader in the Mideast joins the talks


Newly obtained emails undermine RFK Jr.’s testimony about 2019 Samoa trip before measles outbreak

Researchers at the Peterson Institute for International Economics last month calculated the investment pledges at $5 trillion from the EU, Japan, South Korea, Taiwan, Switzerland, Liechtenstein and the Persian Gulf states of Saudi Arabia, Qatar, Bahrain and the United Arab Emirates.

And they raised doubts about whether the money will actually materialize, partly because the agreements are vague and sometimes because the countries would strain to afford the commitments.

But all the numbers are huge nonetheless. Total private investment in the United States was most recently running at a $5.4 trillion annual pace. In 2024, the last year for which figures are available, total foreign direct investment in the United States amounted to $151 billion. Direct investment includes money sunk into such things as factories and offices but not financial investments like stocks and bonds.

Find AP Fact Checks here: https://apnews.com/APFactCheck.

Wall Street bounces back as tech stocks recover and bitcoin stops plunging

posted in: All news | 0

By STAN CHOE, AP Business Writer

NEW YORK (AP) — Wall Street is bouncing back from big losses taken earlier in the week, as technology stocks recover some of their losses on Friday and bitcoin halts its plunge, at least for now.

Related Articles


How to start saving — even if you’re starting from scratch


Securian, Bush Foundation invest $30M in downtown St. Paul fund


EU accuses TikTok of ‘addictive design’ that harms children, seeks changes to protect users


Hims & Hers launches copy of Wegovy pill, prompting legal threats from drugmaker Novo Nordisk


St. Paul: Owner of Grand/Fairview site — former Grandview Grill — courts developers

The S&P 500 rose 0.9% and was heading for just its second gain in the last eight days. The Dow Jones Industrial Average was up 776 points, or 1.6%, as of 10:15 a.m. Eastern time, and the Nasdaq composite was 0.5% higher.

Chip companies helped drive the gains, and Nvidia rallied 4.9% to trim its loss for the week, which came into the day at just over 10%. Broadcom climbed 3.8% to eat into its drop for the week of 6.3%.

They were the two strongest forces lifting the S&P 500, and they benefited from hopes for big spending on chips by companies to drive their forays into artificial-intelligence technology. Amazon, for example, said late Thursday it expects to spend about $200 billion on investments this year to take advantage of “seminal opportunities like AI, chips, robotics, and low earth orbit satellites.”

Such heavy spending, similar to what Alphabet announced a day earlier, is creating concerns of their own, though. The question is whether all those dollars will prove to be worth it through bigger profits in the future. With doubt remaining about that, Amazon’s stock dropped 8.5%.

Even with Friday’s rebound, the S&P 500 is still heading toward its third losing week in the last four. Besides worries about the big spending on AI by Big Tech companies, whose stocks are the most influential on Wall Street, concerns about AI potentially stealing customers away from software companies also hurt the market through the week.

Bitcoin, meanwhile, steadied itself somewhat following a weekslong plunge that had sent it more than halfway below its record set in October. It climbed back to $68,000 after briefly dropping around $60,000 late Thursday.

Prices in the metals market also calmed a bit following their own wild swings. Gold rose 2% to $4,986.20 per ounce, while silver slipped 0.3%.

Their prices suddenly ran out of momentum last week following jaw-dropping rallies, which were driven by investors clamoring for something safe to own amid worries about political turmoil, a U.S. stock market that critics called expensive and huge debt loads for governments worldwide. By January, though, prices were surging so quickly that critics called it unsustainable.

On Wall Street, the recovery for bitcoin helped stocks of companies enmeshed in the crypto economy. Robinhood Markets jumped 11.7% for the biggest gain in the S&P 500. Crypto trading platform Coinbase Global rose 7.3%. Strategy, the company that’s made a business of buying and holding bitcoin, soared 15.9%.

Stocks of smaller U.S. companies also helped lead the market, along with companies whose profits depend on U.S. households spending more money. They benefited from potentially encouraging data on how U.S. consumers are feeling.

A preliminary report from the University of Michigan suggested sentiment among U.S. consumers is improving slightly, when economists were expecting to see a drop. The improvement was strongest among households who own stocks, which are benefiting from the S&P 500 setting a record late last month.

To be sure, sentiment “remained at dismal levels for consumers without stock holdings,” according to Surveys of Consumers Director Joanne Hsu.

Airline stocks were strong with hopes that more confident customers will translate into more spending on trips. That included gains of 5.4% for United Airlines, 4.6% for American Airlines and 4.4% for Delta Air Lines.

The smaller stocks in the Russell 2000 index, meanwhile, jumped 2.3% to more than double the gain of the S&P 500. Smaller stocks can be more dependent on the strength of the U.S. economy for their profits than their big, multinational rivals.

In stock markets abroad, indexes rose across much of Europe.

That was even though Stellantis, the auto giant whose stock trades in Milan, lost nearly 26% after saying it would take a charge of 22 billion euros, or $26 billion, as it dials back its electric vehicle production. The automaker acknowledged “over-estimating the pace of the energy transition” and said it was resetting its business “to align the company with the real-world preferences of its customers.”

Stocks fell across much of Asia, but Japan’s Nikkei 225 rose 0.8%. It benefited from a 2% climb for Toyota Motor, which said CEO Koji Sato will step down in April and will be replaced by the company’s chief financial officer, Kenta Kon.

In the bond market, Treasury yields held relatively steady. The yield on the 10-year Treasury erased an earlier modest loss and was holding at 4.21%, where it was late Thursday.

AP Business Writers Chan Ho-him and Matt Ott contributed.

The worst (and best) US airports for flight disruptions

posted in: All news | 0

A company that helps passengers receive compensation for flight cancellations and delays, AirHelp, has come out with a ranking of U.S. airports most afflicted by disruptions in 2025.

It shows that New Jersey continues to earn its reputation as the travel wasteland of the East Coast, whereas — surprise! — California is doing pretty dang good.

Last year, 248 million U.S. passengers ran up against flight disruptions, according to AirHelp. These were concentrated most heavily at airports along the Eastern Seaboard. On the flip side, the 10 airports with fewest disruptions include Los Angeles International Airport, San Francisco International Airport and San Diego International Airport (though Honolulu took top place).

The company also determined the worst months of the year for disruptions. It’s all about summer misery, with July and June being the worst.

AirHelp’s biggest airport disruptions in 2025

1 Newark Liberty International Airport: 29.1% of passengers disrupted in 2025

2 O’Hare International Airport: 29%

3 New York LaGuardia Airport: 29 percent

4 Ronald Reagan National Airport: 28.8%

5 Denver International Airport: 27.5%

6 Philadelphia International Airport: 27.3%

7 Miami International Airport: 27%

8 John F. Kennedy International Airport: 27%

9 Fort Lauderdale-Hollywood International Airport: 26.1%

10 Orlando International Airport: 26%

Source: airhelp.com