WASHINGTON — A woman drove up to a Minnesota home in a Mazda on Sunday night with a bag of cash totaling $120,000, ready to hand it to one of the 12 jurors in a multimillion-dollar charitable fraud case in the Minneapolis federal courthouse.

“This is for Juror 52,” Assistant U.S. Attorney Joe Thompson quoted the woman saying, according to a story in the Sahan Journal. “Tell her there will be another bag for her if she votes to acquit.”

The juror was not home at the time, so the woman left the cash and the message with a relative, Thompson said in court, according to accounts from journalists in the courtroom. The U.S. attorney’s office said in an interview with The New York Times that the accounts were accurate and that more details would be forthcoming.

Prosecutors said the juror reported the apparent bribery attempt to local police.

That revelation roiled the trial of seven defendants accused of stealing $41 million from government programs meant to feed hungry children, through a nonprofit called Feeding Our Future, during the COVID-19 pandemic. Prosecutors have accused them — and dozens of others — of stealing $250 million by claiming to have served nonexistent meals to nonexistent children.

So far, 18 people have pleaded guilty.

Earlier: Former St. Paul nonprofit leader pleads guilty in Feeding Our Future fraud case.

The current case is the first related to that scandal to come to trial. After six weeks, the trial is nearing its end. Defense attorneys are expected to make their final closing arguments this week. In court Monday, defense attorneys said they were troubled by the allegations, according to accounts from the courtroom.

In response to the revelation, U.S. District Judge Nancy Brasel dismissed the juror, and quizzed the remaining jurors and alternates about whether they had been contacted in a similar way, according to an account from the Minneapolis-based Star Tribune. All said no, the newspaper reported.

Police in Spring Lake Park, Minnesota — where the bribe attempt took place — referred questions to the U.S. attorney’s office.

This article originally appeared in the New York Times.

Related Articles

Fraud trial juror reports getting bag of $120,000 and promise of more if she’ll acquit

Gunman in killing of Alex Becker as he walked home in St. Paul gets 30-year prison sentence

Driver killed after stopping vehicle in center lane of I-694 in Oakdale on Sunday morning

BCA identifies two officers who fired weapons during fatal assault of fellow officer

Hennepin County attorney drops murder charges against State Patrol trooper in shooting death of Ricky Cobb II

By SARA CLINE (Associated Press)

BATON ROUGE, La. (AP) — A person found guilty of a sex crime against a child in Louisiana could soon be ordered to undergo surgical castration, in addition to prison time.

Louisiana lawmakers gave final approval to a bill Monday that would allow judges the option to sentence someone to surgical castration after the person has been convicted of certain aggravated sex crimes — including rape, incest and molestation — against a child younger than 13. Several states, including Louisiana, currently can order such criminals to receive chemical castration, which uses medications that block testosterone production in order to decrease sex drive. However, surgical castration is a more invasive procedure.

If an offender “fails to appear or refuses to undergo” castration after a judge orders the procedure, they could be hit with “failure to comply” charge and face an additional three to five years in prison, based on the bill’s language.

“This is a consequence,” Republican state Sen. Valarie Hodges said during a committee hearing on the bill in April. “It’s a step over and beyond just going to jail and getting out.”

The bill now heads to the desk of conservative Gov. Jeff Landry, who will decide whether to sign it into law or veto it.

Currently, there are 2,224 people imprisoned in Louisiana for sex crimes against children younger than 13. However, if the bill becomes law, it can only be applied to those who have convicted a crime that occurred on or after Aug. 1 of this year.

The sponsor of the bill, Democratic state Sen. Regina Barrow, has said it would be an extra step in punishment for horrific crimes. She hopes the legislation will serve as a deterrent to such offenses against children.

“We are talking about babies who are being violated by somebody,” Barrow said during an April committee meeting. “That is inexcusable.”

While castration is often associated with men, Barrow said the law could be applied to women, too. She also stressed that imposing the punishment would be by individual cases and at the discretion of judges. The punishment is not automatic.

The proposed law also stipulates that a medical expert must “determine whether that offender is an appropriate candidate” for the procedure before it’s carried out.

A handful of states — including California, Florida and Texas — have laws in place allowing for chemical castration, but in some of those states offenders can opt for the surgical procedure if they prefer. The National Conference of State Legislatures said they are unaware of any states that currently have laws in place, like the bill proposed in Louisiana, that would specifically allow judges to impose surgical castration.

Louisiana’s current chemical castration law has been in place since 2008, however very few offenders have had the punishment passed handed down to them — with officials saying from 2010 to 2019, they could only think of one or two cases.

The bill, and chemical castration bills, have received pushback, with opponents saying it is “cruel and unusual punishment” and questioned the effectiveness of the procedure. Additionally some Louisiana lawmakers have questioned if the punishment was too harsh for someone who may have a single offense.

“For me, when I think about a child, one time is too many,” Barrow responded.