Bessent divests from soybean farmland ahead of Trump aid announcement for farmers

posted in: All news | 0

By FATIMA HUSSEIN

WASHINGTON (AP) — Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent has proclaimed solidarity with U.S. farmers in recent months as they grappled with the loss of a major soybean buyer due to President Donald Trump’s trade war with China.

Related Articles


Bomb explosion kills over 30 in eastern Congo after army clashes with pro-government militia


Even as SNAP resumes, new work rules threaten access for years to come


Trump’s former lawyer Alina Habba resigning as top federal prosecutor in New Jersey


ICEBlock app maker sues Trump administration for free speech violations


Judge orders the release of an immigrant with ties to White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt

But now, Bessent says he’s divested his holdings in North Dakota soybean farmland. “I actually just divested it this week as part of my ethics agreement, so I’m out of that business,” Bessent said on the CBS program “Face the Nation,” Sunday.

Bessent’s holdings had raised eyebrows as he headed Trump administration negotiations with China over trade and tariffs. On Monday, he’s expected to be part of an announcement for a new $12 billion farm aid package at the White House.

Bessent, a millionaire former hedge fund manager, had in October stated that he shared the concerns of U.S. farmers who bore the brunt of the trade war between the U.S. and China, telling ABC News “I’m actually a soybean farmer.”

China had been the largest buyer of American soybeans, but significantly increased tariffs on farm products in May after Trump imposed tariffs on Chinese goods — and cut its purchases of U.S. soybeans.

“I have felt this pain too,” Bessent said.

An ethics agreement compliance certification filing on the U.S. Office of Government Ethics website, dated Dec. 5, provides some explanation about the financial disclosure, but not much detail.

As part of his ethics agreement, Bessent was required to divest his portion of the investment, which he had described was made through a family partnership. A Treasury representative did not respond to an Associated Press request for comment.

Pregnant immigrants held for months in detention despite rules against it

posted in: All news | 0

Rachel Uranga, Los Angeles Times (TNS)

LOS ANGELES — Lorena Pineda was five months pregnant when masked agents picked her up on a street corner near a San Fernando Home Depot in June.

An agent grabbed her from the vending stand she ran with her sister-in-law and put her against a car. “Be careful,” she told him. “I’m pregnant.”

“Don’t think I am going to let you go because of that,” she recalled him saying.

Immigration and Customs Enforcement policy states agents shouldn’t detain, arrest or hold pregnant, postpartum and nursing mothers for “administrative violation of immigration laws” barring “exceptional circumstances” or if their release is “prohibited by law.”

But pregnant women are increasingly picked up, deported and detained under the Trump administration, advocates and lawyers contend.

Pineda, 27, was held at a downtown L.A. processing center before being transferred to San Bernardino, flown to Atlanta and then to a staging facility in Alexandria, La., and then taken on an hours-long ride to a rural part of that state — where for 3½ months she watched her belly grow and her dreams of life in America fade.

The American Civil Liberties Union has documented more than a dozen cases of what it says are pregnant women housed without proper medical care at Stewart Detention Center in Lumpkin, Ga., and the ICE processing center in Basile, La., where Pineda was held.

In one case, a woman was shackled while she miscarried. Another woman with a high-risk pregnancy was placed in solitary confinement. In other instances, women have been denied prenatal care or not given translation services to speak with medical staff. Some complained that their pleas for medical services were ignored for weeks, according to the ACLU.

“This is only the tip of the iceberg,” said Eunice Cho, a lawyer with the ACLU and co-author of a letter sent to acting ICE Director Todd Lyons in October asking that pregnant detainees be released.

According to Department of Homeland Security spokesperson Tricia McLaughlin, it is “exceedingly rare” for pregnant women to be in detention. Those who are, she said, receive “regular prenatal visits, mental health services, nutritional support, and accommodations aligned with community standards of care.”

It’s unclear just how many pregnant and postpartum women are in custody, because a congressional mandate to semiannually report the number lapsed under the Republican-led Congress.

Lawyers around the country have said their pregnant clients have been held in dire conditions. In California, Angie Rodriguez, an asylum seeker held in the Mesa Verde ICE Processing Center in Bakersfield, miscarried in July. She has since been released.

At the facility in Basile, Neysis Mairena was six months pregnant with twins when she was hospitalized after experiencing contractions last month and was shackled to a hospital bed, said her lawyer, Thea Crane.

These women, Cho said, “have been ripped away from their families, transported to detention facilities that are thousands of miles away from their families, and they’re sitting in detention in these horrifying conditions — worried not only about their families at home being deported, but also the health and safety of their pregnancies.”

McLaughlin noted that Pineda, Rodriguez and Mairena all had crossed the southern border in the last five years and were “released into the country under the Biden administration.”

The medical care in detention, she said, is probably the “best healthcare” that many immigrants have received in their life.

McLaughlin said the ACLU’s findings don’t identify women by name and amount to “anonymous, unsubstantiated and unverifiable claims.”

“Pregnant women currently make up 0.133% of all illegal aliens in custody,” she said, adding that they “are subject to elevated oversight.”

She added that “all tragic, four miscarriages occurred at South Louisiana ICE Processing Center — that is 10% of the pregnant detainees and well below the national average.”

McLaughlin said Rodriguez didn’t even know she was pregnant when she was detained and set for expedited removal.

Mairena, a Nicaraguan immigrant, was never shackled to a hospital bed and had been arrested on allegations of cruelty to a juvenile, McLaughlin said.

Crane, her attorney, said Mairena was accused of domestic abuse with child endangerment because her 7-year-old daughter was present during an altercation with her partner. Crane is fighting those charges, saying Mairena was defending herself.

Mairena was released from detention on Nov. 26, after The Times inquired about her case.

After her arrest, Pineda spent more than three months in a repurposed prison in Louisiana. The state has become a hub for immigrant detention under the Trump administration.

She came to know the other immigrant women housed in a large room lined with 54 beds and a television droning most waking hours. The Salvadoran mother of two said she felt her baby grow inside her as the days passed and she settled into a heartsore rhythm, bonding with strangers longing for children, family and home.

She counted at least 20 other pregnant women at the facility. Some of those she met were released, Pineda said; others were quickly deported.

One of the women, she recalled, was about four months pregnant when she miscarried twins. The woman cried and begged guards for days after to help her get pills to expel the fetuses — help that did not come before Pineda left the facility.

Another pregnant woman she met was set to be deported, but officials held her and she wound up miscarrying. Eight days later, they deported her, she said.

“Imagine,” Pineda said. “They waited until she lost the baby before deporting her.”

The conditions at the facility were difficult. Guards yelled. The meals inside, she said, were mostly junk food. Hot dogs, spaghetti. The stories she heard rattled her.

One woman she met at the facility had been arrested leaving the hospital after having a C-section. She said immigration officials eventually deported her without her child, though they were later reunited.

“I was afraid of something like this,” Pineda said. “You don’t know what’s going to happen.” She was terrified of giving birth in custody.

The Women’s Refugee Commission, a Washington, D.C., nonprofit, has been attempting to track the number of pregnant, postpartum and nursing mothers detained by immigration agents and document the conditions they face. Its leaders say they have encountered significant hurdles.

“We really don’t know what is happening inside detention centers,” said Zain Lakhani, the commission’s director of migrant rights and justice.

With the reporting requirements eliminated and access to facilities diminished after the administration ended many legal programs inside the facilities, it is hard to get a true picture. “We used to be able to speak with them and then escalate complaints, either to the office of civil rights and civil liberties or directly, sort of internally to the facility. We are no longer able to do that.”

Since launching the tracker, she said, the group has “received significant reports of pregnant, postpartum, lactating women who are being detained,” though she was not willing to share figures. There’s also evidence that ICE is not following policy to provide adequate housing, medical care and nutrition.

“These are extremely vulnerable populations that require specialized healthcare, that require a specialized nutrition and diet,” Lakhani said. “We know very clearly from all of the medical guidelines around pregnancy that you are someone who needs to be able to go to a doctor on a very regular basis. There are all kinds of routine and emergency, and just urgent kind of healthcare needs that you have.”

In July, an investigation spearheaded by Sen. Jon Ossoff (D-Ga.) into human rights abuses in immigration detention found “14 credible reports of mistreatment of pregnant women, and 18 credible reports of mistreatment of children.” The reports included lack of adequate medical care, timely checkups or adequate meals.

“The inhumane treatment of pregnant women by the administration is shameful,” the Democratic Women’s Caucus wrote to acting ICE Director Lyons last month, demanding the release of pregnant, postpartum and nursing immigrants who don’t pose a security risk.

Pineda migrated from El Salvador in 2023, part of an unprecedented wave of millions who arrived at the U.S. border between 2020 and 2025. Her husband and two young children, along with her mother and brother, fled the country hoping to escape gang members who harassed and beat her husband at work, she said. Her father had already settled in the U.S.

They found a “coyote” who charged thousands of dollars and asked her mother to put up her land as collateral until the debt was paid off. But when they arrived, they found making ends meet difficult. They shuffled between homes in the San Fernando Valley, staying with relatives and sometimes strangers.

After a while, her husband had steady work in construction. Her daughter, now 7, was learning English and enjoyed school. Her 3-year-old son was making friends. Pineda and her sister-in-law had started a food stand, where she sold breakfast and pupusas to day laborers near the Home Depot.

On June 19, she rose hours before daybreak, dressed and went to her sister-in-law’s apartment. As the sun rose, they began preparing the food and were selling it in the parking lot by 6 a.m. She earned about $200 a week from the stand and used the money to help buy groceries and odds and ends for the children. She had been nervous about heading out that morning.

Two weeks earlier, raids orchestrated by U.S. Border Patrol Cmdr. Greg Bovino had upended Los Angeles’ immigrant community.

Around 8:30 a.m. agents pulled up in an unmarked car.

Pineda still has the surveillance video of the arrest on her mother’s phone. You can barely make her out.

“I couldn’t run because I was pregnant,” she said. “They handcuffed me with my hands in the back, put me in the car and took me.”

She arrived at the South Louisiana ICE Processing Center on June 24. Pineda said there were medical staffers on site, but nobody equipped to conduct sonograms or any of the normal care she was accustomed to. To see a doctor, she was bused nearly three hours each way to a medical center in Monroe, La.

For the first month, she said, she couldn’t call her family.

Related Articles


Bullets in Luigi Mangione’s bag convinced police that he was UnitedHealthcare CEO killing suspect


Judge orders the release of an immigrant with ties to White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt


Settlement approved for New Orleans Archdiocese to pay hundreds of clergy abuse victims


Honduran man is held without bond in North Carolina train stabbing that drew comments from Trump


12 FBI agents fired for kneeling during racial justice protest sue to get their jobs back

Separated from her daughter and son by 1,500 miles and walls and fences, she had to get out of there.

“It was really hard for her,” she said of her daughter. “Every time she talked to me, she cried.”

She befriended a group of seven women. To pass the time, they weaved bracelets and rings out of plastic bags and talked about their homeland. She saw women who fought their cases.

After more than three months, guards told her that she was set to see a judge.

“I told them I didn’t want to,” she said. “I had signed my papers” to self-deport to El Salvador.

The judge set her departure date for Oct. 3 and she was told to arrange a flight to Los Angeles.

Her family skipped paying the rent and purchased her a ticket. It was Sept. 29. Guards dropped her off at the airport.

Days later, she met with immigration officials in Los Angeles. With her pregnancy nearly full term, the officials extended her departure date to March.

The day is bearing down on her.

“My husband said he won’t let me go alone,” she said. So she is trying to figure out how to pay for four tickets home. And how they will put food on the table in El Salvador.

Her mom still has a plot of land in the country where she planted fruit trees. There are mangoes, guayabas, jocotes and peaches.

And there are also the women she befriended in detention.

“Estan esperandome,” she said. They are waiting for me.

©2025 Los Angeles Times. Visit at latimes.com. Distributed by Tribune Content Agency, LLC.

Bomb explosion kills over 30 in eastern Congo after army clashes with pro-government militia

posted in: All news | 0

By JUSTIN KABUMBA and MONIKA PRONCZUK

GOMA, Congo (AP) — A bomb explosion killed more than 30 people and wounded 20 others in eastern Congo following a dispute between the Congolese army and a pro-government militia, despite a deal signed in Washington and touted as a major step toward peace in the country.

Related Articles


‘It’s not safe to live here.’ Colombia is deadliest country for environmental defenders


A year after Bashar Assad fled, Syria struggles to heal


Climate change threatens Asia’s water and power systems, reports warn


Woman sentenced to 4 years in prison for blackmailing soccer star Son Heung-min


UN Palestinian aid agency says Israeli police ‘forcibly entered’ its Jerusalem compound

Residents and civil society leaders told The Associated Press that the FARDC, the Congolese army’s acronym, and Wazalendo, which has been helping the army combat the insurgents, clashed before they felt the blast in the town of Sange in South Kivu Sunday evening.

More than 100 armed groups vie for a foothold in mineral-rich eastern Congo near the border with Rwanda, most prominently the Rwanda-backed M23 group. The conflict has created one of the world’s most significant humanitarian crises with more than 7 million people displaced, officials say.

The explosion came less than a week after a U.S.-brokered peace agreement was finalized in an attempt to stop the ongoing war between the Congolese armed forces and the Rwanda-backed M23 rebel group in the eastern part of Congo. But the fighting continues, according to residents, civil society and analysts.

“FARDC soldiers were coming from the front lines and wanted to reach the city of Uvira,” said Faraja Mahano Robert, a civil society leader in Sange. “Once in Sange, they were ordered not to proceed, but some disagreed. That’s when they started shooting at each other, and then a bomb exploded, killing many people.”

Many residents have fled for safety, mainly in the direction of Burundi, eyewitnesses said Monday.

“This morning, we woke up a little better, but people are still leaving the Sange area,” said Amani Safari, a resident. “To the east of the town, there were clashes between the Wazalendo and the FARDC; two FARDC soldiers were killed around 7:30 AM.”

Another resident, David Kaserore, said: “It’s difficult to distinguish between the enemy and the FARDC, as they are killing all the civilians. We demand that the government end this war. We are tired.”

The army did not immediately reply to a request for comment.

Meanwhile, Congolese President Felix Tshisekedi accused Rwanda in a speech in parliament on Monday of violating the peace agreement and “organizing the plundering of our natural resources and destabilizing our institutions.”

Tshisekedi and his Rwandan counterpart, Paul Kagame, met U.S. President Donald Trump in Washington last week to sign the peace deal. Lauded by the White House as a “historic” agreement, the pact followed monthslong peace efforts. The agreement finalized a deal signed in June.

President Donald Trump, Rwanda’s President Paul Kagame and Democratic Republic of Congo President Felix-Antoine Tshisekedi, during a signing ceremony at the U.S. Institute of Peace, Thursday, Dec. 4, 2025, in Washington. (AP Photo/Evan Vucci)

“The very next day after the signing, units of the Rwandan Defence Forces conducted and supported heavy weapons attacks launched from the Rwandan town of Bugarama, causing significant human and material damage,” he said, calling the incident an “aggression by proxy” and refuting claims of internal rebellion.

Edouard Bizimana, the foreign minister of Burundi, accused Rwanda on Monday of “playing a double game. (Rwanda) claims to be negotiating and signing agreements, but in the meantime, it is intensifying attacks on the civilian population with kamikaze drones that kill instinctively.”

Burundian forces fight alongside the Congolese army to combat the M23 armed group.

Bizimana accused Rwanda of “indiscriminate attacks” on the civilians and troops, calling them “a provocation that Burundi cannot tolerate.”

He added his country has formally warned Kigali and “if this is repeated, Burundi has the right to prosecute those who have attacked Burundi.”

There was no immediate comment from Rwandan authorities.

Last week, residents said the fighting had intensified in South Kivu despite the deal. M23 and Congolese forces have repeatedly accused each other of violating the terms of the ceasefire agreed on earlier this year.

Earlier this year, M23 seized Goma and Bukavu, two key cities in eastern Congo, in a major escalation of the conflict.

The rebels in Congo are supported by about 4,000 troops from neighboring Rwanda, according to U.N. experts, and at times have vowed to march as far as Congo’s capital, Kinshasa, about 1,000 miles to the east.

Associated Press writers Saleh Mwanamilongo in Bonn, Germany, Jean-Yves Kamale in Kinshasa, Congo, and Renovat Ndabashinze in Bujumbura, Burundi contributed to this report.

Even as SNAP resumes, new work rules threaten access for years to come

posted in: All news | 0

By Renuka Rayasam and Katheryn Houghton and Samantha Liss, KFF Health News

Alejandro Santillan-Garcia is worried he’s going to lose the aid that helps him buy food. The 20-year-old Austin resident qualified for federal food benefits last year because he aged out of the Texas foster care system, which he entered as an infant.

Related Articles


Bessent divests from soybean farmland ahead of Trump aid announcement for farmers


Bomb explosion kills over 30 in eastern Congo after army clashes with pro-government militia


Trump’s former lawyer Alina Habba resigning as top federal prosecutor in New Jersey


ICEBlock app maker sues Trump administration for free speech violations


Judge orders the release of an immigrant with ties to White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt

The Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program — commonly referred to as food stamps, or SNAP — helps feed 42 million low-income people in the United States. Now, because of changes included in the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, to keep his food benefits Santillan-Garcia might soon have to prove to officials that he’s working.

He said he lost his last job for taking time off to go to the doctor for recurrent stomach infections. He doesn’t have a car and said he has applied to a grocery store, Walmart, Dollar General, “any place you can think of” that he could walk or ride his bike to.

“No job has hired me.”

Under the new federal budget law, to be eligible for SNAP benefits, more people are required to show that they are working, volunteering, or studying. Those who don’t file paperwork in time risk losing food aid for up to three years. States were initially instructed to start counting strikes against participants on Nov. 1, the same day that millions of people saw their SNAP benefits dry up because of the Trump administration’s refusal to fund the program during the government shutdown. But federal officials backtracked partway through the month, instead giving states until December to enforce the new rules.

The new law further limits when states and counties with high unemployment can waive recipients from requirements. But a legal battle over that provision means that the deadline for people to comply with the new rules varies depending on where recipients live, even within a state in some cases.

The U.S. Department of Agriculture did not respond to a detailed list of questions about how the new rules around SNAP will be implemented, and the White House did not respond to a request for comment about whether the rules could kick off people who rely on the program. The law did extend exemptions to many Native Americans.

Still, states must comply with new rules or accrue penalties that could force them to pay a bigger share of the program’s cost, which was about $100 billion last year.

President Donald Trump signed the massive budget bill, along with the new SNAP rules, into law on July 4. States initially predicted they would need at least 12 months to implement such significant changes, said Chloe Green, an assistant director at the American Public Human Services Association who advises states on federal programs.

Under the law, “able-bodied” people subject to work requirements can lose access to benefits for three years if they go three months without documenting working hours.

Depending on when states implement the rules, many people could start being dropped from SNAP early next year, said Lauren Bauer, a fellow in economic studies at the Brookings Institution, a policy think tank. The changes are expected to knock at least 2.4 million people off SNAP within the next decade, according to the Congressional Budget Office.

“It’s really hard to work if you are hungry,” Bauer said.

Many adult SNAP recipients under 55 already needed to meet work requirements before the One Big Beautiful Bill Act became law. Now, for the first time, adults ages 55 to 64 and parents whose children are all 14 or older must document 80 hours of work or other qualifying activities per month. The new law also removes exemptions for veterans, homeless people, and former foster care youths, like Santillan-Garcia, that had been in place since 2023.

Republican policymakers said the new rules are part of a broader effort to eliminate waste, fraud, and abuse in public assistance programs.

Agriculture Secretary Brooke Rollins said in November that in addition to the law, she will require millions to reapply for benefits to curb fraud, though she did not provide more details. Rollins told Newsmax that she wants to ensure that SNAP benefits are going only to those who “are vulnerable” and “can’t survive without it.”

States are required to notify people that they are subject to changes to their SNAP benefits before they’re cut off, Green said. Some states have announced the changes on websites or by mailing recipients, but many aren’t giving enrollees much time to comply.

Anti-hunger advocates fear the changes, and confusion about them, will increase the number of people in the U.S. experiencing hunger. Food pantries have reported record numbers of people seeking help this year.

Even when adhering to the work rules, people often report challenges uploading documents and getting their benefits processed by overwhelmed state systems. In a survey of SNAP participants, about 1 in 8 adults reported having lost food benefits because they had problems filing their paperwork, according to the Urban Institute. Some enrollees have been dropped from aid as a result of state errors and staffing shortfalls.

Pat Scott, a community health worker for the Beaverhead Resource Assistance Center in rural Dillon, Montana, is the only person within at least an hour’s drive who is helping people access public assistance, including seniors without reliable transportation. But the center is open only once a week, and Scott says she has seen people lose coverage because of problems with the state’s online portal.

Jon Ebelt, a spokesperson with the Montana health department, said the state is always working to improve its programs. He added that while some of the rules have changed, a system is already in place for reporting work requirements.

In Missoula, Montana, Jill Bonny, head of the Poverello Center, said the homeless shelter’s clients already struggle to apply for aid, because they often lose documentation amid the daily challenge of carrying everything they own. She said she’s also worried the federal changes could push more older people into homelessness if they lose SNAP benefits and are forced to pick between paying rent or buying food.

In the U.S., people 50 or older are the fastest-growing group experiencing homelessness, according to federal data.

Sharon Cornu is the executive director at St. Mary’s Center, which helps support homeless seniors in Oakland, California. She said the rule changes are sowing distrust. “This is not normal. We are not playing by the regular rules,” Cornu said, referring to the federal changes. “This is punitive and mean-spirited.”

In early November, a federal judge in Rhode Island ordered the Trump administration to deliver full SNAP payments during the government shutdown, which ended Nov. 12. That same judge sought to buffer some of the incoming work requirements. He ordered the government to respect existing agreements that waive work requirements in some states and counties until each agreement is set to end. In total, 28 states and the District of Columbia had such exemptions, with different end dates.

Adding to the confusion, some states, including New Mexico, have waivers that mean people in different counties will be subject to the rules at different times.

If states don’t accurately document SNAP enrollees’ work status, they will be forced to pay later on, Green said. Under the new law, states must cover a portion of the food costs for the first time — and the amount depends on how accurately they calculate benefits.

During the government shutdown, when no one received SNAP benefits, Santillan-Garcia and his girlfriend relied on grocery gift cards they received from a nonprofit to prioritize feeding his girlfriend’s baby. They went to a food pantry for themselves, even though many foods, including dairy, make Santillan-Garcia sick.

He’s worried that he’ll be in that position again in February when he must renew his benefits — without the exemption for former foster care youths. Texas officials have yet to inform him about what he will need to do to stay on SNAP.

Santillan-Garcia said he’s praying that, if he is unable to find a job, he can figure out another way to ensure he qualifies for SNAP long-term.

“They’ll probably take it away from me,” he said.

What You Should Know

Changes to SNAP removed work-requirement exemptions for:

People ages 55 to 64.
Caretakers of dependent children 14 or older
Veterans
People without housing
People 24 or younger who aged out of foster care

What SNAP Participants Should Do:

Check with public assistance organizations to find out when the new rules go into effect in your region. Your benefits may be checked at recertification, but you may be required to meet the monthly work reporting rules long before that.
Let your state know if you’re responsible for a dependent child younger than 14 who lives in your home; pregnant; a student at least half the time; attending a drug or alcohol treatment program; physically or mentally unable to work; a Native American; or a caretaker of an incapacitated household member. If so, you may still be exempt.

©2025 KFF Health News. Distributed by Tribune Content Agency, LLC.