Opinion: The Socialist Roots of Latino Politics in New York

posted in: All news | 0

“The beginnings of Latino politics in New York largely embraced a brand of socialism and was principally the domain of Puerto Ricans,” the author writes. “This group organized an entire political movement focused on racial and social justice.”

Left: Bernardo Vega (center) with Jesus Colon and Raul Mendez in 1940. (The Center for Puerto Rican Studies at Hunter College). Right: Councilmember Alexa Avilés (Gerardo Romo / NYC Council Media Unit)

Councilmember Alexa Avilés is exploring a run for Congress in a bid to take on the current Congressman Dan Goldman. That she is doing so recalls the very beginnings of Latino politics in New York.

Like those early figures, Avilés is both Puerto Rican and a socialist. Is Avilés’ rise the continuation of a trend in New York City largely initiated by another Puerto Rican socialist—Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (AOC)? Let me explain why it goes much deeper into our history than that.

The beginnings of Latino politics in New York largely embraced a brand of socialism and was principally the domain of Puerto Ricans. Avilés and AOC are heirs of a politics that goes back over a century. The election of AOC in 2018 began a new chapter in what we call “Latino” politics in New York, one that as I am indicating here, takes a page (whether consciously or not) from the embryonic phase of our people’s politics in the city.

The key early figures in Latino politics—Jesús Colón, Bernardo Vega, Matias Nieves, among others—were socialists through and through. They understood the principles of classical socialism as pivotal for the attainment of economic justice, particularly for marginalized groups like Puerto Ricans. The work of Colón and company followed that of a group of Puerto Rican and Cuban migrants in the late 19th century, whom historian Jeffrey Hoffnung-Garskof has called “migrant revolutionaries.”

This group organized an entire political movement focused on racial and social justice. Their work focused on what we now call Afro-Latinidad, and was intentionally coalitional in nature. Colón, Vega and company continued this work in the late 1910s and 1920s, though they particularly sought the amelioration of the economic plight of Puerto Rican Latinos and other impoverished groups.

Many of these early Puerto Rican socialists, and others who were integral members of the New York City labor movement, were cigar makers. Workers’ rights, fair wages, and fair labor practices formed the nucleus of their struggle. They organized strikes, wrote treatises, and (in the case of Vega) formed the first Puerto Rican chapter of the Socialist Party of New York, in so doing seeking political recognition in addition to economic justice for their people.

It is important to note that, at this point, there is no indication that Vega or others were particularly focused on political representation. These early organizing efforts emerged from a desire to alleviate poverty, improve working conditions, and secure more jobs for Puerto Ricans and other impoverished communities. For Vega, immersion in the socialist politics of the day was not driven merely by an attachment to a particular economic or political philosophy. Instead, it was shaped by his own impoverished circumstances.

Vega was a socialist not because it was fashionable, but because he saw in it a practical response to economic injustice—an injustice he was experiencing firsthand as a Puerto Rican living in New York. In his “Memoirs of Bernardo Vega,” he describes some of the struggles he endured during his early years in the city, writing: “…times were very bad. There simply was no work, and with every passing day I saw my situation grow bleaker and bleaker.”

Vega and other Puerto Ricans found a political home in the Socialist Party of New York. In his memoir, Vega describes a warm reception from many of the members of the party, including its leader, Morris Hillquit. Not only did they offer to help Vega find work and become important interlocutors, but the Socialist Party of New York offered Vega a model and an impetus to think about broader ways to fight for economic justice on behalf of Puerto Ricans and other Latinos. 

Vega, Jesús Colón, and others would form the Alianza Obrera Puertorriqueña, a movement that took on the fight for economic justice while effectively creating a bridge between New York’s Socialist Party and Puerto Rico’s own socialist party. Perhaps unbeknownst to them at the time, these pivotal early organizing efforts would pave the way for the election of the first Latino to win elected office in New York just 10 years later, with the 1937 election of Puerto Rican socialist Oscar García Rivera.

I expand on some of this history in two of my previously published essays on the topic, published here and here. The latter particularly shows that the development of Latino politics in New York eventually veered away from its early socialist sensibilities. And this is why I consider AOC’s victory and continued rise as the insertion of a new chapter in the continued development in Latino politics in New York. This is also why, although it is a new chapter, it is a reversion to our earliest roots.

This new chapter does not end with AOC but rather begins with her. The buzz which her electoral success created around the city was not just among those immersed in socialist politics, but also among younger Latina/o aspiring political and community leaders. Several months after AOC’s surprise victory, Julia Salazar, also a member of the Democratic Socialists of America (DSA), defeated then long-time incumbent State Senator Martin Dilan. Salazar is of Colombian descent. 

In 2019, just a year after AOC became a national figure, Tiffany Cabán, another Puerto Rican Latina, embarked on what seemed to be a David vs. Goliath contest, taking on Melinda Katz for the district attorney position in Queens. Cabán, who had never before run for office and came into the race with virtually no name recognition, almost spurred another political earthquake. She lost to Katz by a mere 60 votes in a race in which over 90,000 voters participated.

In 2020, Jessica González-Rojas, also a DSA member, won election to the State Assembly. She is of Paraguayan and Puerto Rican descent. Avilés won in 2021, and in 2022 Kristen Gonzalez won election to the State Senate. Of Puerto Rican and Colombian descent, Gonzalez is likewise a member of the DSA. Claire Valdez, representing parts of Queens in the State Assembly, is another DSA member elected in 2024. These socialist elected officials are all Latinas. 

And there could be another addition to this list, provided that Diana Moreno is successful in her bid to replace Mayor-elect Zohran Mamdani in the Assembly. Interestingly enough, another DSA member, Brian Romero, is seeking to replace his former boss, Jessica Gonzalez-Rojas, in the Assembly. He would essentially be the first DSA male Latino to win an elected office, provided his bid is successful.

As we can observe, this new era in Latino politics in Gotham has seen the rise and success of Latino (in this case, all Latinas) socialist political leaders with possible additions to the list. Will we have a second Puerto Rican socialist woman win a seat in the U.S. House of Representatives to continue the story?

Eli Valentin is a former Gotham Gazette contributor and currently serves as assistant dean of graduate and leadership studies at Virginia Union University’s Graduate Center in Harlem. His forthcoming book, “Politicking from the Barrio: Essays in Latino Politics in New York” (forthcoming from Wipf and Stock), chronicles the development of Latino politics in New York over the last decade.

The post Opinion: The Socialist Roots of Latino Politics in New York appeared first on City Limits.

The Supreme Court will decide whether Trump’s birthright citizenship order violates the Constitution

posted in: All news | 0

By MARK SHERMAN, Associated Press

WASHINGTON (AP) — The Supreme Court agreed Friday to take up the constitutionality of President Donald Trump’s order on birthright citizenship declaring that children born to parents who are in the United States illegally or temporarily are not American citizens.

Related Articles


Indiana House Republicans pass Trump-backed map, setting up high-stakes Senate fight


Trump is meeting Mexican President Sheinbaum in person for the first time at World Cup draw


FIFA gives President Donald Trump a peace prize in a departure from its traditional focus on sport


Trump administration will expand travel ban to more than 30 countries, Noem says


Trump ventures deeper into anti-immigrant language by calling people from Somalia ‘garbage’

The justices will hear Trump’s appeal of a lower court ruling that struck down the citizenship restrictions. They have not taken effect anywhere in the country.

The case will be argued in the spring. A definitive ruling is expected by early summer.

The birthright citizenship order, which Trump signed Jan. 20, the first day of his second term, is part of his administration’s broad immigration crackdown. Other actions include immigration enforcement surges in several cities and the first peacetime invocation of the 18th-century Alien Enemies Act.

The Republican administration is facing multiple court challenges, and the high court has sent mixed signals in emergency orders it has issued. The justices effectively stopped the use of the Alien Enemies Act to rapidly deport alleged Venezuelan gang members without court hearings. But the Supreme Court allowed the resumption of sweeping immigration stops in the Los Angeles area after a lower court blocked the practice of stopping people solely based on their race, language, job or location.

The justices also are weighing the administration’s emergency appeal to be allowed to deploy National Guard troops in the Chicago area for immigration enforcement actions. A lower court has indefinitely prevented the deployment.

Birthright citizenship is the first Trump immigration-related policy to reach the court for a final ruling. His order would upend more than 125 years of understanding that the Constitution’s 14th Amendment confers citizenship on everyone born on American soil, with narrow exceptions for the children of foreign diplomats and those born to a foreign occupying force.

In a series of decisions, lower courts have struck down the executive order as unconstitutional, or likely so, even after a Supreme Court ruling in late June that limited judges’ use of nationwide injunctions.

The Supreme Court, however, did not rule out other court orders that could have nationwide effects, including in class-action lawsuits and those brought by states. The justices did not decide at that time whether the underlying citizenship order was constitutional.

Every lower court that has looked at the issue has concluded that Trump’s order violates or likely violates the 14th Amendment, which was intended to ensure that Black people, including former slaves, had citizenship. Birthright citizenship automatically makes anyone born in the United States an American citizen, including children born to mothers who are in the country illegally, under long-standing rules.

The case under review comes from New Hampshire. A federal judge in July blocked the citizenship order in a class-action lawsuit including all children who would be affected.

The administration had also asked the justices to review a ruling by the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in San Francisco. That court, also in July, ruled that a group of Democratic-led states that sued over Trump’s order needed a nationwide injunction to prevent the problems that would be caused by birthright citizenship being in effect in some states and not others. The justices took no action in the 9th circuit case.

The administration has asserted that children of noncitizens are not “subject to the jurisdiction” of the United States and therefore not entitled to citizenship.

“The Fourteenth Amendment’s Citizenship Clause was adopted to grant citizenship to newly freed slaves and their children—not…to the children of aliens illegally or temporarily in the United States,” top administration top Supreme Court lawyer, D. John Sauer, wrote in urging the high court’s review.

Twenty-four Republican-led states and 27 Republican lawmakers, including Sens. Ted Cruz of Texas and Lindsey Graham of South Carolina, are backing the administration

Indiana House Republicans pass Trump-backed map, setting up high-stakes Senate fight

posted in: All news | 0

By ISABELLA VOLMERT, Associated Press

Indiana state House Republicans passed a new state congressional map Friday at the behest of President Donald Trump, advancing the legislation to the state Senate, where it is unclear if enough lawmakers will support its final passage.

Republican lawmakers voted 57-41 in favor of the map, which splits the city of Indianapolis into four districts to help the GOP potentially win all nine Indiana congressional seats. While Trump and many other Republicans are celebrating the passage, the map faces its true test in the state Senate, where many GOP lawmakers have opposed mid-decade redistricting.

Democrats in the House minority decried the new map, with many criticizing the swift timeline of the past week. The map was introduced on Monday. In 2021, when the current congressional district map was passed, state lawmakers held multiple public hearings around the state over several months.

Related Articles


Trump is meeting Mexican President Sheinbaum in person for the first time at World Cup draw


FIFA gives President Donald Trump a peace prize in a departure from its traditional focus on sport


Trump administration will expand travel ban to more than 30 countries, Noem says


Trump ventures deeper into anti-immigrant language by calling people from Somalia ‘garbage’


US vaccine advisers say not all babies need a hepatitis B shot at birth

Democratic state Rep. Greg Porter, who represents Indianapolis, railed against the proposal on the House floor, saying it would dilute the power of Black Hoosiers. U.S. Rep. André Carson, who has represented Indianapolis for the past 17 years and stands to lose his seat, is the state’s only Black member of Congress.

“What we’re doing today with this proposed legislation is taking away the rights of Black and brown people in Indiana,” Porter said. “It cracks Marion County!”

The Republican author of the redistricting legislation, state Rep. Ben Smaltz, said on the floor Wednesday that the map and bill language were provided by the National Republican Redistricting Trust, the GOP’s primary redistricting entity that was also involved in drawing Texas’ new map this year. Smaltz said the Trust gave Indiana Republicans one option for the statewide map.

Republicans currently hold seven of Indiana’s nine U.S. House seats. Indiana lawmakers have been under increasing pressure from the White House to follow the lead of Republicans in Texas, Missouri, Ohio and North Carolina, which have all passed new maps in recent months ahead of next year’s midterms. To offset the GOP gains, Democrats in California and Virginia have moved to do the same.

Smaltz said Friday the tit-for-tat mid-decade redistricting between Democratic and Republican states may continue for the next several cycles and “may be the new normal.”

The Indiana House vote ups the pressure on Senate Republicans to approve the new map for final passage.

While redistricting is typically done at the beginning of a new decade with the census, Trump has pushed Republican-led states to redistrict this year to give the GOP an easier path to maintaining its majority in the U.S. House. Democrats only need to flip a handful of seats next November to overcome the GOP’s current margin, and midterm elections typically favor the party opposite the one in power.

Previously, the top Republican of the state Senate, Rodric Bray, said there were not enough votes to support redistricting. In the 50-member Senate, Republicans need at least 25 votes to pass the legislation. A 26th tiebreaking vote could come from Republican Lt. Gov. Micah Beckwith.

The next hurdle for the new map will come in a Senate committee, where it could face a smaller number of opposed senators.

The issue has sharply divided Republicans in the Hoosier state. Senators on both sides of the issue have been subject to threats and swatting attempts in recent weeks.

Trump has said he will back primary opponents against any GOP senator who opposes redistricting. But half the chamber, including Bray, is not up for reelection until 2028.

The map approved by House Republicans splits the Democratic city of Indianapolis — which currently makes up the entirety of the 7th Congressional District — into four quadrants divided among four rural districts. The new map also groups the cities of East Chicago and Gary with several Republican counties in northern Indiana, potentially ousting Democratic U.S. Rep. Frank Mrvan, who represents the current district in the state’s northwest corner near Chicago.

In the ballooning redistricting battle, the U.S. Supreme Court handed a win to Texas Republicans Thursday by allowing the state to conduct next year’s elections under the new congressional map that favors the GOP and could give the party five more seats.

St. Croix County hires law firm in solar farm review

posted in: All news | 0

The western Wisconsin county where Xcel Energy has planned a solar farm has decided to hire a law firm to help iron details concerning the new project.

While finalizing its 2026 budget, the St. Croix County Board of Supervisors voted to add up to $352,000 in legal services with Attolles Law concerning development of the joint development agreement.

The Ten Mile Creek Solar project calls for 300 megawatts to be generated on solar panels spread across 2,980 acres of leased land in St. Croix County. The project also includes building and routing a new transmission line to the existing grid connections at Xcel’s Allen S. King Power Plant in Oak Park Heights.

The coal-fired King plant is set to be decommissioned in 2028, but Xcel plans to continue to use existing connections at the site. Originally, Xcel’s Ten Mile Creek Solar proposal included up to 650 megawatts of solar panel production on 5,000 acres spread across some 60 square miles in St. Croix County.

St. Croix County Board of Supervisors chair Bob Long told the Pioneer Press that the county wants to wrap up some finer details within the joint development agreement, particularly concerning safety concerns regarding fire risks and environmental agreements concerning long term planning, such as eventual decommission of the site.

“We’re working with by far the best expert on this whole process that we can find,” said Long of Attolles Law, which often represents the Wisconsin Counties Association and many other public entities in the state.

Long described the discussions with Xcel Energy representatives thus far as “fruitful.”

No additional meetings are currently scheduled, but Xcel representatives said the discussions will be ongoing and have been positive.

“As we have for several months, we are continuing to discuss the contents of a Joint Development Agreement with St. Croix County and have met with the county’s internal and external attorneys,” Xcel Energy spokesperson Christine Ouellette said.

In November, Attolles Law reviewed the draft agreement and attorney Rebecca Roeker on Nov. 4 went through that input with the board, releasing a list with nine of their most essential concerns, as well as nine other concerns.

Roeker and St. Croix County Public Information Officer Adam Kastonek declined several attempts for additional comment.

Of most concern, Roeker said the draft agreement could limit St. Croix County’s ability to object at the Public Service Commission of Wisconsin, the body that will be responsible for approval of the solar farm. Depending on legal reading of the language, the joint development agreement could bar county representatives from making statements “adverse to an agreed upon term,” unless new information related to that issue was found.

Roeker said this draft also covered approximately 3,000 acres, which represents Xcel Energy’s updated project scope. However, Xcel has secured land leases for the full 5,000 acres, and company officials previously said they will maintain those leases as needed.

The county could have an agreement for each project phase, or one umbrella agreement for the entire solar farm, Roeker said, but it should include language defining those specifications.

Related Articles


Democrat Mandela Barnes, a former US Senate candidate, enters the Wisconsin governor’s race


Cold relationship between P.J. Fleck and Luke Fickell heats up Axe rivalry


Wisconsin seeks to block conditional release of woman involved in Slender Man stabbing after escape from group home


Season’s first winter storm could bring 4-8 inches of snow in metro


Wisconsin woman in 2014 Slender Man stabbing is found a day after walking away from group home

“We want to make sure the JDA covers the entire ‘capital P’ project,” said Roeker.

Another issue the attorney noted was the definition of “designated roads” in the solar farm development, which, based on the draft agreement, could mean any town or county road. If St. Croix County wished to limit the roads to those designated for the project; the language should be cleaned up, Roeker said.

Roeker told the supervisors at the Nov. 4 meeting that the concerns were reasonable, and in line with other joint contract agreements her firm had negotiated previously.

Xcel Energy expects to submit its project application to the Public Service Commission of Wisconsin near the beginning of next year. From there, the commission would kick off a 12-18 month review process. If eventually approved, the first phase of the Ten Mile Creek Solar Project could begin in late 2027, with a goal of starting service by late 2029.