Russian court sentences an American to 5 years on charges of illegally transporting arms

posted in: All news | 0

MOSCOW (AP) — A Russian court convicted and sentenced an American on charges of illegally transporting weapons, court officials said Monday.

Related Articles


Starmer says a trade war is in no one’s interest after Trump’s Greenland tariff threat


What to know about the train crash in Spain


Man and boy critical after 3 shark attacks off Sydney in just over 24 hours


Today in History: January 19, Indira Gandhi becomes first prime minister of an independent India


$1 billion in cash buys a permanent seat on Trump’s ‘Board of Peace’

The U.S. citizen, identified as Charles Wayne Zimmerman, was handed a 5-year sentence by the court in Russia’s Black Sea resort of Sochi after a rifle was found on his yacht in June. Russian customs officials found the weapon while inspecting it upon arrival in Sochi.

The regional courts’ press service said in a statement that Zimmerman told the court that he traveled to Russia to meet a woman he had previously contacted online. It added that Zimmerman argued that he had bought the gun for self-defense and was unaware that it wasn’t allowed to keep it on his yacht.

There was no immediate comment from U.S. officials.

Zimmerman is one of a few Americans who remain in Russian custody after a series of high-profile prisoner exchanges with the United States in recent years.

What to know about the train crash in Spain

posted in: All news | 0

MADRID (AP) — A high-speed train in southern Spain derailed Sunday evening, colliding with another high-speed train and killing at least 39 people and injuring more than 150 others, Spanish authorities reported.

Rescue efforts were still ongoing Monday and officials said the death toll is likely to rise. The accident was the deadliest in Spain since a 2013 crash that killed 80 people after a commuter train hurtled off the rails as it came around a bend.

Here’s what to know about the crash:

The derailment and collision

The derailment occurred Sunday at 7:45 p.m. when the tail end of a train carrying 289 passengers on the route from Malaga to the capital, Madrid, went off the rails. It slammed into an incoming train traveling from Madrid to Huelva, another southern city, according to rail operator Adif.

The head of the second train took the brunt of the impact, Transport Minister Óscar Puente said. That collision knocked its first two carriages off the track and sent them plummeting down a 4-meter (13-foot) slope. The collision took place near Adamuz, a town in the province of Cordoba, about 370 kilometers (about 230 miles) south of Madrid.

On Monday morning, Andalusia’s regional President Juan Manuel Moreno said authorities were searching the area near the accident for possible bodies.

“The impact was so incredibly violent that we have found bodies hundreds of meters away,” Moreno said.

Officials call accident ‘strange,’ with investigation underway

Explanations about what caused the crash were scant, with an official investigation underway.

Transport Minister Puente called the crash “truly strange” since it happened on a flat stretch of track that had been renovated in May. He said the train that jumped the track was less than 4 years old. That train belonged to the private company Iryo, while the second train, which took the brunt of the impact, belonged to Spain’s public train company, Renfe.

Iryo said in a statement Monday that its train was manufactured in 2022 and passed its latest safety check on Jan. 15.

Álvaro Fernández, the president of Renfe, told Spanish public radio RNE that both trains were traveling well under the speed limit of 250 kph and “human error could be ruled out.”

Spain’s expansion of high-speed rail network

Spain has spent decades investing heavily in high-speed trains. It currently has the largest rail network in Europe for trains traveling over 250 kph (155 mph), with more than 3,100 kilometers (1,900 miles) of track, according to the European Union.

The network is a popular, competitively priced and safe mode of transport. Sunday’s accident was the first with deaths on Spain’s high-speed rail network since it opened its first line in 1992.

Man and boy critical after 3 shark attacks off Sydney in just over 24 hours

posted in: All news | 0

By ROD McGUIRK

MELBOURNE, Australia — A man and boy were critically injured and another boy had his surfboard bitten during three separate shark attacks in Sydney in just over 24 hours, police said on Monday.

A surfer in his 20s was bitten on a leg by a shark off North Steyne Beach on the Pacific Ocean coast in the northern suburb of Manly at 6:20 p.m. local time Monday, a police statement said.

Bystanders pulled him from the water before an ambulance took him to a hospital in a critical condition, police said.

On Sunday, a 12-year-old boy suffered serious injuries to both legs after jumping from a six-meter (20-foot) high ledge known as Jump Rock, near Shark Beach inside Sydney Harbor in the eastern suburb of Vaucluse. Police have credited the boy’s three friends with saving his life by jumping from the cliff during the attack and dragging him back to shore.

“The actions of his mates who have gone into the water to pull him out have been nothing but brave,” Supt. Joseph McNulty told reporters.

“Those actions of those young men are brave under the circumstances and very confronting injuries for those boys to see,” McNulty added.

News media have reported that the boy lost both legs in the attack.

Around noon on Monday, an 11-year-old boy was on a surfboard that was attacked by a shark at Dee Why Beach, an ocean beach north of Manly. The shark bit off a chunk of the board, but the boy escaped uninjured.

Local authorities said Sydney’s northern beaches, including North Steyne and Dee Why, would remain closed until further notice.

All three beaches near where the attacks occurred have some form of shark protection netting. It was not immediately clear where the attacks occurred in relation to that netting.

Authorities suspect bull sharks are responsible for at least the first two attacks.

Police had warned after the first attack that recent heavy rain over Sydney had increased the amount of fresh and murky water inside the harbor, heightening the bull shark danger.

Dee Why Beach is close to Ocean Reef Beach where a 57-year-old surfer was killed by a suspected white shark last September.

In November, a 25-year-old Swiss tourist was killed and her partner was seriously injured trying to save her as they swam off a national park north of Sydney.

Related Articles


Orcas put on a show off Seattle


Pets we featured in our newsletter in December


Woman killed in suspected mountain lion attack while hiking in northern Colorado


Here are some of the pets we featured in our Morning Report newsletter in 2025


A $400K lobster heist with a Minnesota connection

 

Downtown St. Paul: The man with a plan for U.S. Bank Center, other empty buildings

posted in: All news | 0

Days before a scheduled foreclosure auction, the nonprofit St. Paul Downtown Development Corporation announced earlier this month it had bought the U.S. Bank Center’s distressed mortgage from First Interstate Bank of Omaha, Neb. While troubled property owner Madison Equities continues to hold title to the 25-story office tower, the downtown development corporation is now the lender, giving it a path forward to steer the fate of the 25-story tower, which is about 26% occupied.

Dave Higgins. (Courtesy of the St. Paul Downtown Alliance)

This isn’t the first acquisition for the year-old nonprofit.

In the past few months, the St. Paul Downtown Development Corporation has acquired the Alliance Bank Center, the Capital City Plaza parking ramp, the Empire Building and the adjoining Endicott Arcade, all of them vacant properties previously owned by Madison Equities, with the stated goal of someday reactivating stagnant corners of downtown.

The Pioneer Press recently interviewed Dave Higgins, the development corporation’s president. A real estate attorney by training, he worked for the Boston Redevelopment Authority and the real estate group of the global law firm DLA Piper before spending most of the past 10 years as a vice president of development with the Minnesota companies Roers and McGough.

The following transcript of the interview has been edited for length and clarity.

Q: How long do you plan to hold onto the U.S. Bank Center? Are you going to serve as the mortgage lender indefinitely?

A: I don’t have a specific timeframe for you. We have some study and analysis to do. During that timeframe, we’ll be the lender, and Madison will be the owner.

Q: Still, your overall goal isn’t to make the nonprofit a major longtime property owner downtown, is it?

A: It really depends on the asset. We certainly have the ability to be a developer/redeveloper of any of these assets. We’re actually doing it on the Capital City Plaza to the extent it needs restoration work. We’re expecting to start and complete that in 2026.

We’re expecting to get work done on the Endicott Arcade in 2026. If we can identify a worthy tenant or a worthy couple of tenants, we’ll do that. We’d like to activate that on street level. In terms of Alliance Bank Center, it might be possible we do a joint venture with somebody else, depending upon what materializes. It’s also possible an investor might come along and say ‘I’d love to take it over.’ If it’s someone who has the experience and capability we can have faith in, it’s possible we might pass the baton and let someone else develop it.

We’re not trying to get in the way of the market. We only exist because we’ve sort of reached a state downtown where the conventional players aren’t taking on some of these assets, and we need momentum to continue. If we create enough momentum where folks come forward odds are good, if they’re capable, that we would step out of the way and hand it off to let the market do what the market should be doing in a normal, healthy environment.

Q: The St. Paul Downtown Alliance has raised the possibility that some buildings may never be successfully repurposed and may just have to come down. With the U.S. Bank Center, could you ever foresee demolishing it?

A: It’s one outcome that’s possible. I think it’s one of the best candidates downtown for a conversion to residences, at least from a spatial standpoint. There’s a lot of structural analysis that needs to be worked out. There’s a lot of cost in terms of plumbing and those challenges, but it works pretty well from a space standpoint. The north half of the block is underdeveloped with a drive-through and an empty bar. The entire block is subject to the debt. If somebody came along and replaced Madison Equities as the owner, they would get the whole block.

Q: So you’re actively pursuing a conversion of U.S. Bank Center to apartments?

A: It’s something that will be studied. If it doesn’t work from a spatial standpoint, it doesn’t make sense to do all the other evaluation. But it does work from a spatial standpoint. Gensler (a global architecture, planning and design firm) got hired to look at 20 buildings downtown, and 10 scored pretty well for potential residential conversion. U.S. Bank Center scored, if not the top, than among the top candidates for residential.

The U.S. Bank Center building in downtown St. Paul on Thursday, Oct. 24, 2024. (John Autey / Pioneer Press)

Q: The Downtown Alliance, which launched your nonprofit, is a public-private partnership between City Hall and major downtown employers like Securian and Ecolab. You’ve said no public funds went into this mortgage acquisition. Then who funded it?

A: We’re not public at the present time with who our investors are.

Q: You’re now a nonprofit lender to Madison Equities, which is a private business. Is U.S. Bank Center still on the tax rolls, and will you pay the $2.6 million in delinquent property taxes?

A: We are a nonprofit. The building is owned by a for-profit. So it’s still on the tax rolls. That tax obligation remains a current obligation of the current property owner, not the lender. It remains to be seen what the future obligations will be.

Q: For the properties that are now owned outright by SPDDC — Alliance Bank, Capital City Plaza, Empire Building, Endicott Arcade — are these now off the tax rolls completely, given that SPDDC is a nonprofit?

A: Alliance has been granted tax-exempt status starting with the 2026 tax year. We do not yet have that status for CCP, so that is to be determined, and Empire Building was acquired too recently to have that status. Alliance is a precedent, so to be determined. The county has an application.

Q: If U.S. Bank Center becomes a tax-forfeit property for failing to pay back taxes, would SPDDC, as the lender, be first in line to acquire it outright?

A: It depends. The county would need to make a decision that it was in the best interest of the county to proceed with a tax forfeiture process. Invariably, because we’re another party involved, they would undoubtedly consult with us whether there’s anything we’d be interested in doing to avoid that. That could take years. It’s a process that has a period of years of delinquency required before the county would exercise that step.

Q: Is Madison Equities paying you, as the lender? If Madison Equities defaults on its mortgage, does the deed transfer to SPDDC?

A: It’s not paying the lender. (But a deed transfer is) not automatic. A lender would still need to follow a foreclosure process, and technically there’s a few different avenues for foreclosing through the court process. There’s an alternate process we used at Alliance Bank Center, called a deed in lieu of foreclosure, where an owner hands over the deed to the property in exchange for the lender agreeing to avoid a foreclosure process. There might be some monetary component to it, like a judgment they agree to pay, but it’s basically a lender agreeing to move on.

Q: It seems pretty clear eventually you’ll end up with this property.

A: There’s potential for that.

Q: You’ve said you don’t want to compete with the market. There was a foreclosure auction scheduled for Jan. 12. Now the private sector won’t get a chance to bid on U.S. Bank Center’s mortgage, and we’re told at least five or six potential bidders had registered. Isn’t that competing with the private sector?

A: It’s hard to know how many of those were actually going to bid or had signed up and were simply tracking it. It’s hard to say. We’ve been having conversations with the lender over 2025, and it made the most sense for them to continue with us. Almost two years ago now, CBRE (the real estate services provider) put out a marketing book with 10 Madison Equities properties, and nobody acquired the property. Saying we locked out competition is not really accurate. (An expedited online auction) is sort of a move of last resort, short of a group like ours stepping in.

We clearly had resources. We’re present. We’re local. We have a singular mission that is downtown-focused. I think the bank did some reasonable math about that. There’s plenty of instances around the country where someone buys a property online, sight unseen, and the property sits and languishes.

Q: With U.S. Bank Center, you now own or largely control five buildings downtown through acquisition?

A: Yes. Initially, with the Alliance Bank Center, we bought the debt in early June. It was about 60 days later that we then got the deed. It was a deed in lieu of foreclosure. The Capital City Plaza Parking ramp I think technically would be considered a short sale, which is just a sale of a property where its value is less than the mortgage. It triggers the requirement of the lender to approve the sale price.

Q: Do you plan to acquire more properties downtown?

Related Articles


U.S. Bank Center mortgage acquired by St. Paul Downtown Development Corporation


St. Paul: Downtown Development Corp. buys Capital City Plaza parking ramp


St. Paul Downtown Development Corp. seeks to acquire Alliance Bank Center


Downtown developers, advocates weigh in on Madison Equities selling St. Paul properties


How could the sale of the Madison Equities portfolio impact downtown St. Paul?

A: I don’t have plans to at the present time. It’s neither a plan to, nor beyond the possibility of happening. But we don’t plan to at the present time.

Q: You’ve said your goal is to reactivate stagnant corners of downtown. You’ve launched a public engagement process to solicit feedback. How can the public weigh in?

A: The “Reimagine Downtown St. Paul: Transforming the Core” outreach began last month. If you go to downtownstpaul.com/reimagine, there’s a map where over 400 people have left comments, and other people have given thumbs-up or thumbs-down to those comments. We have a public survey, pop-ups and small group conversations planned. The website describes it pretty well.