Supreme Court strikes down Trump’s sweeping tariffs, upending central plank of economic agenda

posted in: All news | 0

By LINDSAY WHITEHURST

WASHINGTON (AP) — The Supreme Court struck down President Donald Trump’s far-reaching global tariffs on Friday, handing him a significant loss on an issue crucial to his economic agenda.

The 6-3 decision centers on tariffs imposed under an emergency powers law, including the sweeping “reciprocal” tariffs he levied on nearly every other country.

It’s the first major piece of Trump’s broad agenda to come squarely before the nation’s highest court, which he helped shape with the appointments of three conservative jurists in his first term.

The majority found that the Constitution “very clearly” gives Congress the power to impose taxes, which include tariffs. “The Framers did not vest any part of the taxing power in the Executive Branch,” Chief Justice John Roberts wrote.

Justices Samuel Alito, Clarence Thomas and Brett Kavanaugh dissented.

“The tariffs at issue here may or may not be wise policy. But as a matter of text, history, and precedent, they are clearly lawful,” Kavanaugh wrote in the dissent.

The tariffs decision doesn’t stop Trump from imposing duties under other laws. While those have more limitations on the speed and severity of Trump’s actions, top administration officials have said they expect to keep the tariff framework in place under other authorities.

The Supreme Court ruling comes despite a series of short-term wins on the court’s emergency docket that have allowed Trump to push ahead with extraordinary flexes of executive power on issues ranging from high-profile firings to major federal funding cuts.

The Republican president has been vocal about the case, calling it one of the most important in U.S. history and saying a ruling against him would be an economic body blow to the country. But legal opposition crossed the political spectrum, including libertarian and pro-business groups that are typically aligned with the GOP. Polling has found tariffs aren’t broadly popular with the public, amid wider voter concern about affordability.

The Constitution gives Congress the power to levy tariffs. But the Trump administration argued that a 1977 law allowing the president to regulate importation during emergencies also allows him to set tariffs. Other presidents have used the law dozens of times, often to impose sanctions, but Trump was the first president to invoke it for import taxes.

Trump set what he called “reciprocal” tariffs on most countries in April 2025 to address trade deficits that he declared a national emergency. Those came after he imposed duties on Canada, China and Mexico, ostensibly to address a drug trafficking emergency.

A series of lawsuits followed, including a case from a dozen largely Democratic-leaning states and others from small businesses selling everything from plumbing supplies to educational toys to women’s cycling apparel.

The challengers argued the emergency powers law doesn’t even mention tariffs and Trump’s use of it fails several legal tests, including one that doomed then-President Joe Biden’s $500 billion student loan forgiveness program.

The economic impact of Trump’s tariffs has been estimated at some $3 trillion over the next decade, according to the Congressional Budget Office. The Treasury has collected more than $133 billion from the import taxes the president has imposed under the emergency powers law, federal data from December shows. Many companies, including the big-box warehouse chain Costco, have already lined up in court to demand refunds.

Follow the AP’s coverage of the U.S. Supreme Court at https://apnews.com/hub/us-supreme-court.

End of enhanced Obamacare subsidies puts tribal health lifeline at risk

posted in: All news | 0

By Katheryn Houghton, Jazmin Orozco Rodriguez, KFF Health News

Leonard Bighorn said his mother tried for two years to get help for severe stomach pain through the limited health services available near her home on the Fort Peck Reservation in northeastern Montana.

Related Articles


Union and New York hospital system reach a tentative deal to end the city’s largest nursing strike


Early prenatal care, considered best for moms and babies, is on the decline in the US


Wisconsin passes expanded Medicaid for moms, would leave Arkansas as only state without it


What you think about your attachment style might be completely wrong


If exercise can make you feel good, why do so many people hate doing it?

After his mom finally saw a specialist in Glasgow, about an hour away, she was diagnosed with stage 4 colon cancer, Bighorn said.

Now, 16 years after his mother’s death, Bighorn has access to regular screenings for cancer and other specialty care that she didn’t have, through a health insurance program the Fort Peck Tribes created in 2016. The program, which covers most of the costs for the roughly 1,000 tribal citizens enrolled, is among a growing number of tribally sponsored health insurance programs.

Such programs vary by tribe, but they essentially screen and enroll people living within tribal boundaries in Affordable Care Act marketplace plans. They allow participating Native Americans flexibility to go to outside doctors and clinics when care through the Indian Health Service is unavailable.

“I’d be in a bind otherwise,” said Bighorn, a 65-year-old tribal game warden and member of the Dakota community.

But the Fort Peck Tribes now limit who has access to that coverage. Nearly 400 miles to the west, the Blackfeet Nation recently stopped enrolling people in a similar program, warning that funding will run out before the end of the year. Other tribal organizations that offer Native Americans similar coverage are struggling with rising costs, too.

The financial crunch began when congressional lawmakers allowed enhanced subsidies under the Affordable Care Act to expire on Dec. 31. Those tax credits, created under the Biden administration during the covid-19 pandemic, expanded subsidized health coverage for millions of people. By late 2025, ACA plans saw about 24 million enrollees, more than twice the number of pre-pandemic annual sign-ups. The cost of coverage shot up for most of those people as the expanded subsidies expired, and enrollment so far has dropped by more than 1 million people, according to federal health officials.

The subsidies had also boosted tribal health insurance programs, like the one Bighorn is enrolled in. The programs pay the price of each person’s share of premiums after subsidies, and the coverage lowers patients’ treatment costs. Now that premium prices have ballooned, so have tribes’ costs.

Rae Jean Belgarde, who directs Fort Peck Tribes’ program, said the higher costs leave the tribes with one option at this point: “Start limiting who gets help.”

The tribes are helping people shift to other insurance options and, in some cases, find state programs to cover their premiums. Tribal leaders also sent a letter to Montana’s all-Republican congressional delegation asking them to support extending the subsidies.

“Our program is saving lives,” the letter read. Belgarde said she didn’t know whether the lawmakers responded.

Scrambling for Solutions

U.S. House members approved a temporary extension of the enhanced subsidies in January. But that measure stalled in the Senate. Lawmakers are scrambling for an alternative after President Donald Trump threatened to veto an extension if a bill reaches his desk. On Jan. 15, the president released an outline of a health care proposal that includes creating savings accounts for people to pay their health costs — an idea Senate Republicans previously floated as an alternative to the subsidies.

A.C. Locklear, CEO of the National Indian Health Board, a nonprofit that works to improve health in Native communities, said tribes are “looking at ways to cut back just as much as everyone else.”

Native Americans as a group continue to face disproportionately high rates of chronic diseases. Their median age at death is 14 years younger than that of white Americans.

“Reducing access to even just general primary care has a significant impact on those disparities,” Locklear said.

Tribal leaders have said letting the subsidies expire further undermines the federal government’s duty to ensure adequate care for Native Americans.

In exchange for taking tribal land through colonization, the U.S. government made long-standing promises to provide for the health and well-being of tribes. Native Americans are guaranteed free health care at clinics and hospitals operated or funded by the Indian Health Service. But that agency’s chronic underfunding has created massive blackouts in care. It sometimes pays for patients’ outside care through its Purchased/Referred Care program, but that’s limited too. Due to funding shortfalls, the agency prioritizes which treatments it will pay for.

To help fill the coverage gaps, some tribal nations have built their own health insurance programs. When tribes pay health premiums, clinics and hospitals in their areas can bill for services that might otherwise go unpaid. Some tribes have leveraged that money to expand services.

“I don’t see tribes getting rid of these programs,” Locklear said. “But it will drastically shift how much tribes can really put back in their community.”

For example, Tuba City Regional Health Care Corp., in northern Arizona within the Navajo Nation, is unique in providing comprehensive cancer treatment on a reservation, Locklear said. The corporation, he said, estimates its costs to cover patients this year are increasing by roughly 170% to nearly $38,000 per month without the enhanced subsidies.

One of the newer programs is on the Blackfeet reservation in northwestern Montana, where basic health services can be hard to find. Medical visits are often offered on a first-come, first-served basis, and services vanish when staff positions go unfilled, said Lyle Rutherford, a Blackfeet Nation council member.

“Some of it is just getting a regular eye appointment, or a primary care appointment,” Rutherford said.

The tribe has been slowly building its health insurance program since launching it in 2024. Rutherford said the enhanced subsidies made that possible. Fewer than 400 people are enrolled out of an estimated 3,000 who qualify. The tribe halted new enrollments about two months ago because of the pending expiration of subsidies and shifted its healthier members to lower-cost plans.

“At this point in time, we just have to hold off,” Rutherford said. “Premiums have increased by 100-plus percent.”

He said tribal leaders are seeking extra funding to keep the program afloat, and he hopes Congress finds a solution.

Lives on the Line

The impact goes beyond tribes’ insurance programs. The Urban Institute, a Washington, D.C.-based economic and social policy research nonprofit, estimates that 125,000 Native Americans will become uninsured in 2026 due to the higher costs.

Patients at the Oyate Health Center in Rapid City, South Dakota, are already reporting sky-high premium increases for ACA plans. CEO Jerilyn Church said it’s too soon to know how many will forgo coverage. But she said more uninsured patients would further strain the IHS Purchased/Referred Care program — with officials raising the bar for how sick patients must be to cover care outside of tribal health sites.

“There will be people that will not be able to get the care they need,” Church said, adding that could translate to “people losing their lives.”

Bighorn, the game warden on the Fort Peck Reservation, is among those still covered by the tribes’ insurance program. He has put it to use.

Soon after enrolling, Bighorn needed two hip replacements, surgeries that require off-reservation care and are ranked as low-priority procedures by the Indian Health Service. Bighorn said that in pre-surgery tests, specialists found the cause for his long-standing, dangerously high blood pressure. The diagnosis: untreated lifelong asthma and sleep apnea.

“I was a miserable man, tired all the time,” he said.

Without the tribe’s coverage, Bighorn may have eventually gotten those diagnoses but said it would have likely taken years to get help through the Indian Health Service. That would have meant getting much sicker before receiving care.

KFF Health News correspondent Arielle Zionts contributed to this report.

©2026 KFF Health News. Distributed by Tribune Content Agency, LLC.

Is ‘income stacking’ a good way to build wealth?

posted in: All news | 0

The investing information provided on this page is for educational purposes only. NerdWallet, Inc. does not offer advisory or brokerage services, nor does it recommend or advise investors to buy or sell particular stocks, securities or other investments.

Financial planners often say you can pull two basic levers to improve your financial life: earn more money or spend less.

Related Articles


US economy grows at 1.4% rate in the fourth quarter, slower than expected


Inflation rose more quickly than expected in December


Social media companies face legal reckoning over mental health harms to children


US stocks edge lower after reports show both slowing growth and higher inflation


St. Paul: Evereve clothing store on Grand Avenue calls it quits

For people trying to grow their net worth, earning more than one paycheck might seem like the best path forward.

According to Fiverr’s Next Gen of Work survey, 67% of Gen Zers say that having two or more income streams, or “income stacking,” is essential for financial security.

Income stacking is gaining traction with other age groups, too.

Vered Frank, a certified financial planner in New York City, says the topic comes up in about 90% of initial conversations with millennial clients and prospects.

Income stacking can be an effective wealth-building tool, but it won’t pay off for everyone.

Why is income stacking so popular right now?

While side hustles have been around since, well, forever, they’re having a moment in the spotlight. One reason? Social media.

You’ve probably seen more and more influencer videos popping up on your YouTube, Instagram and TikTok feeds.

“I think a lot of people are being exposed to how different people are making money, whether it’s selling on Amazon, a Shopify store, whatever it is,” says Patrick Yaghoobians, a CFP in Los Angeles.

Uncertainty around jobs and the economy is also playing a big part in the phenomenon. Consumer prices have grown, while job growth has slowed.

“People are feeling increasingly frustrated with their jobs, feeling like there isn’t a lot of mobility right now in the workplace, and so all of that is culminating in people wanting to think about different ways to generate income,” Frank says.

Does extra income really help you build wealth?

Income stacking takes many forms. There are options to fit just about any skill or situation, from active work, like freelance writing or tutoring, to more passive income strategies, such as investing in dividend stocks or real estate.

While some side hustles are more lucrative than others, what matters more is how you use the money you bring in. Extra income could go toward a brokerage account, retirement savings or paying off the student loans that have been dragging you down financially.

It’s easier to make income stacking work when you have a clear goal and timeframe in mind, says Samantha Mockford, a CFP with San Francisco-based firm Citrine Capital.

“You may hate sacrificing sleep when you drive rideshare in the evenings, but it may be tolerable if it means being debt-free before the year ends,” she said in an email interview.

A side job might also help you build wealth by giving you an opportunity to develop valuable skills or break into a higher-paying career field.

Where might multiple income streams fall short?

Social media can make income stacking look like a breeze. But the reality is often much more complicated.

With many income streams, the pay can be unpredictable. Yaghoobians, who bought and sold clothes and shoes as a side gig in college, knows this firsthand.

“If you were able to get your hands on a pair of Yeezys when they came out back in the day, you could probably get 4X your money right off the bat,” he says. “Other times, I purchased products in the hopes of flipping them, and I ended up losing money.”

Most side hustles come with a learning curve, Yaghoobians says, and that can be discouraging.

It’s easy to underestimate the time and effort involved, especially with income streams such as rental properties.

“Becoming a landlord is one of the most labor-intensive forms of ‘passive income’ there is,” Mockford said. “You have to be ready to unclog a toilet, fix a broken AC in the summer and coordinate with contractors for major repairs.”

And even if the money comes rolling in, that doesn’t automatically put you on the path to wealth.

If you don’t have a well-thought-out plan, you might lose the extra income to lifestyle creep or costs such as maintenance and taxes.

“Higher income means higher taxes,” Mockford said. “So if your additional income stream does not automatically withhold taxes, remember that a portion of everything you bring in is not yours to keep.”

If your income streams don’t include a traditional full-time job, you may also miss out on valuable employer-sponsored benefits, such as health insurance and 401(k) plans. It’s on you to find alternatives, such as self-employed retirement plans.

Is income stacking right for you?

Frank says income stacking may be more practical for creating a flexible working schedule than for accumulating wealth. The biggest income gains often come from optimizing what someone already has, she says, such as negotiating pay, reducing taxes or investing more efficiently.

Before adding an income stream, you might consider taking steps like having a career conversation with your boss or maximizing the money you put into a health savings account, Frank says.

And if you’re still interested in stacking income? Know what you’re getting yourself into.

“Do proper research before diving into anything or committing any of your financial capital into it,” Yaghoobians says. “And just make sure that whatever you’re doing, you dedicate your time accordingly to make sure that you’re still maintaining the work-life balance that makes sense for your lifestyle and your family and your situation.”

When in doubt, talk to a professional. A financial advisor or certified public accountant can guide you through different scenarios and help you make sense of your options.

More From NerdWallet

Is FIRE Still Realistic?
How to Face Down Estate Planning Paralysis
12 Months of Trump: How Did the Economy Fare?

Lauren Schwahn writes for NerdWallet. Email: lschwahn@nerdwallet.com. Twitter: @lauren_schwahn.

Ramadan’s first Friday prayers are held at Jerusalem’s Al-Aqsa mosque

posted in: All news | 0

By SAM MEDNICK

TEL AVIV, Israel (AP) — Tens of thousands of Palestinians gathered under heavy Israeli restrictions at Jerusalem’s Al-Aqsa Mosque compound for the first Friday prayers of the Muslim holy month of Ramadan, including some who were allowed to enter from the occupied West Bank.

The Ramadan prayers at Al-Aqsa took place for the first time since a shaky ceasefire deal between Israel and Hamas went into effect in October. It was the first opportunity many had to leave the West Bank and pray at the site in Jerusalem’s Old City since Ramadan last year.

Israel restricted the number of Palestinians allowed to enter from the West Bank to 10,000 on Friday, and only allowed men over 55 and women over 50 as well as children up to 12. It has imposed similar restrictions in the past, citing security concerns.

A frequent flashpoint

The hilltop, which Jews refer to as the Temple Mount, is the holiest site in Judaism and was home to the ancient biblical temples. Muslims call the site the Noble Sanctuary. Today it is home to Al-Aqsa Mosque, the third-holiest site in Islam.

Related Articles


Life is harsh and dangerous in Russian-run parts of Ukraine, activists and former residents say


Mexico and El Salvador make big cocaine seizures at sea as US continues lethal strikes


Saudi Arabia may have uranium enrichment under proposed deal with US, arms control experts warn


Police search former Prince Andrew’s home a day after his arrest


Today in History: February 20, Thousands attend pro-Nazi rally at Madison Square Garden

It has frequently been a flashpoint in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.

Israeli police said more than 3,000 police were deployed across Jerusalem. They said their presence was not meant to show aggression or force but was aimed at providing help in case of an emergency.

Many Palestinians view the heightened Israeli security presence, and increasing visits by religious and nationalist Israeli Jews, as a provocation. They fear that Israel intends to take over or partition the compound. The Israeli government denies having any such plans.

Jerusalem’s Islamic Waqf, the Jordanian religious authority that administers the compound, said there were 80,000 in attendance. In normal times, Ramadan Friday prayers at Al-Aqsa can draw up to 200,000.

Ezaldeen Mustafah, a Palestinian from the West Bank, was among those lamenting the restrictions.

“We need more people than this,” he said.

Some Palestinians from the West Bank on Friday said they were turned away from crossing into Jerusalem even though they had permits. Jihad Bisharat said he was told his permit had been canceled and was sent back. Israel’s army didn’t immediately respond to a request for comment.

The Old City, home to major religious sites sacred to Jews, Christians and Muslims, is in east Jerusalem, which Israel captured in the 1967 Mideast war, along with the West Bank and the Gaza Strip. The Palestinians want all three territories for a future state with its capital in east Jerusalem. Israel annexed east Jerusalem, a move not recognized by most of the international community, and considers the entire city to be its capital.

Ramadan in Gaza

Many Palestinians said the month’s typically festive spirit is eluding them as they struggle with grief and losses following two years of conflict in Gaza sparked by Hamas’ Oct. 7, 2023, attack into Israel.

“All the mosques have been bombed,” said Ramiz Firwana, a Gaza resident who gathered with other worshippers for a Friday sermon and prayers held in schoolyard.

On Thursday evening, families sat amid the rubble and destruction for iftar, the meal held at the end of the daily dawn-to-dusk fast.

“Despite the displacement, the pain and the destruction, we want to rejoice and live,” said Mohammad Kollab, from Khan Younis. “We are not a people destined only for destruction and killing.”

Israel’s military offensive has killed more than 72,000 Palestinians, according to Gaza’s Health Ministry, and caused widespread destruction and displaced most of the territory’s residents. Israel launched the offensive after Hamas-led militants killed some 1,200 people, mostly civilians, and took another 251 hostage in the initial attack.

The Oct. 10 U.S.-brokered ceasefire deal has brought an end to major military operations and the release of the remaining hostages. But Palestinians, including many civilians, are still being killed in near-daily strikes that Israel says are aimed at militants who threaten or attack its forces.

Associated Press reporters Sam Metz contributed from Ramallah, West Bank, and Wafaa Shurafa from Gaza City, Gaza Strip.