Bill Burr’s ‘Old Dads’ has lots of bark, little bite

posted in: News | 0

Bill Burr’s comedy comes from the perspective of a middle-age dude unwilling — or unable — to keep up with the progressives.

“Old Dads,” streaming on Netflix, mirrors his stand-up act. He plays a small-business owner on the verge of being canceled for “sins” like sharing a joke about Caitlyn Jenner during a work trip and telling off a snooty principal at his son’s school. His main gripe: Politically correct people don’t really care about the plight of others; they’re just trying to stay out of trouble.

Burr recruited some top talent for his directorial debut (he also co-wrote the script with Ben Tishler). Bobby Cannavale and Bokeem Woodbine play his hapless business partners. Bruce Dern pops up as a cranky Uber driver.

Burr unleashes some memorable rants, like when he lights into a motel owner who scolds him for smoking a cigar. But he ultimately pulls his punches. Just when the film is poised to rake the far left over the coals, he ends up throwing his own character onto the fire. All will be fine, he concludes, as long as you take a few anger management courses and listen to your level-headed wife.

Burr was much more daring in his animated series, “F Is for Family,” also available on Netflix. “Old Dads” is missing that show’s spunk.

Also this week

‘Peter and the Wolf’

Those who can’t afford to see U2’s groundbreaking show at the Sphere in Las Vegas can get a taste of Bono’s artistry in the latest adaptation of Sergei Prokofiev’s symphonic fairy tale. This 30-minute trifle has animation based on Bono’s illustrations and narration from fellow rocker Gavin Friday. The pair contribute some cute touches to modernize the story, but Prokofiev’s music remains the most compelling draw. Thursday, Max

‘Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs’

For a more stupendous animated adventure, check out the newly restored version of the 1937 classic that changed cinema forever. The project’s release is timed to Walt Disney Company’s 100th anniversary. Those who want the party to continue should also stream “Once Upon a Studio” with more than 540 beloved characters gathering for the ultimate group portrait. Disney+

‘The Burial’

Jamie Foxx plays a flashy, chest-pounding attorney who gets in over his inflated head while defending a funeral home operator (Tommy Lee Jones) struggling to keep his business alive. The film sneaks in some messages about race but they get shouted down by theatrical moments that would make even Judge Judy wince. Courtroom proceedings go out the window so that Foxx can deliver “this place is out of order” monologues without interruptions. Prime Video

Tribune News Service

 

Answering the dreaded ‘weakness’ question

posted in: Society | 0

Q. How do you answer the biggest weakness question without sounding like it’s a strength? Like, “I’m too detail-oriented” or “I’m a perfectionist.” This question always stumps me and it keeps coming up during my interviews.

A. It’s a catch-22, isn’t it at times? You don’t want to admit to a weakness like procrastination while you’re supposed to be marketing the most stellar version of yourself. And you’re right — pointing out something like being too detail-oriented, too organized, too anything of something positive is actually a strength.

If you come right out and address a weakness like being disorganized, there’s authenticity to that. When I worked in recruiting, I appreciated the honesty of candidates. The key is not having it be a dealbreaker. They usually followed up with, “I could stand to be more organized at my desk, I’m a work in progress, and it’s getting better, but I need to be intentional about it and make it a priority.” They often said it with a sincere smile — it came off as authentic. And then we moved right along to the next question.

A more effective way for interviewers to ask this question is, “What’s one thing your boss said you should improve upon in your last performance review?”

Maybe it’s communicating or time management or something similar. Recognize something that has room for improvement (but isn’t a deal breaker. If it’s a sales position, I wouldn’t say your relationship-building skills need improvement as that’s integral to the job.)

Instead, you can say something like, “Not getting clear instructions for a task so now I know what questions to ask to gather specific information to run with it. And what I don’t know, I figure out along the way…” You can talk about something weak and then focus on how you’ve been working toward improving.

Q. I’m stumped with references. I don’t have them on my resume, but applications ask. I got downsized at my last job and my boss was awful at the job before that. I feel like I don’t have any references. Can I just leave it blank on the application? Do companies really call them anyway?

A. I’ll cut to the chase: No and yes, some do. You should have at least two, ideally three, references on your application. There’s no rule that says they have to all be former bosses. Ideally, at least one would be a former boss, but they can be a colleague, client, boss from a side hustle or volunteer gig, etc.

And it’s fine they’re not on your resume because employers typically reach out to them toward the latter part of the interview process around the offer stage and not in the earlier stages.

The key to identifying references is to prepare them for possible calls. Tell them the positions you’re pursuing and provide them with elevator pitches of talking points they can lean into, but of course, speak in their own words so it’s not scripted. References usually serve to vouch for your character, integrity, work ethic, skills and experiences.

Ask your references to debrief you afterward — if the employer called, what were their questions? Secondly, send each reference a thank you note (email or snail mail) to acknowledge their time and support.

Tribune News Service

 

Sweet Jailianilize drawn to arts & cooking

posted in: Adventure | 0

Jailianize, who likes to be called Lalie, is a sweet and loving girl. She speaks up for herself but does it respectfully. She tries very hard at everything that she does and finds that she can be successful at most things. Her favorite activities are making art projects, playing with peers, being outside, and just keeping busy. Music, singing, dancing, and cooking are also on the top of her “fun things to do” list. Lalie loves animals and would love a pet in her new home. It takes time for Lalie to trust but, through therapy, she is making speedy progress.

Lalie loves school and has done well, especially this past year. For a long time, Lalie had to be the parent to her younger sister. It can be difficult at times for her to leave her parental role when she is around much younger children and her younger sister. However, Lalie has learned to be a kid rather than a parent and will thrive in a family setting.

Lalie would do best in a home with at least one female caregiver and other children in the home. Most importantly Lalie should be in an active family that will keep her busy, give her structure and much love. There is an open adoption agreement in place with Lalie’s birth parents for two visits per year. Lalie has a close bond to her younger sister in Western Mass. and will need frequent contact with her.

To learn more about adoption from foster care visit www.mareinc.org . Massachusetts Adoption Resource Exchange (MARE) can give you guidance and information on the adoption process.

Bergman: Murdering Jews is Hamas’ mission statement

posted in: News | 0

“O Moslems, O Abdulla, there is a Jew behind me, come and kill him.”

In this injunction in Article Seven of the Hamas Covenant, ratified in 1988, one finds the reason for the invasion of Israel that began on Oct. 7.  Hamas does not merely seek the extermination of Jews.  That is why it exists.  That is why its fighters decapitate Israeli babies, rape Israeli women and burn victims alive.  That is why they humiliate Israel children and grandmothers before killing them.  That is why they slaughter over 200 Israeli teenagers gathered peacefully at a concert.  Everyone in Israel Hamas has murdered were murdered for one reason and one reason only – because they were Jews.  According to the same covenant, which reads like an addendum to Hitler’s “Mein Kampf,” Jews are devoid of humanity, a demonic people responsible for everything Hamas objects to in human history, from the French Revolution to World War II.

The atrocities Hamas has committed are not a regrettable byproduct of warfare that occur in all wars.  They are its purpose.

In the face of such unmitigated evil one might expect the leaders of colleges and universities in Connecticut, and the students who attend them, to respond with moral clarity: distinguishing good from evil, virtue from moral depravity, and an organization committed to the extermination the Jewish people from the nation-state of the Jewish people, the state of Israel, which is the only democracy in the Middle East, and the only country in the Middle East that affords all of its citizens, Jews and Arabs alike, the civil liberties we enjoy in America.

But they did not.

The president of Central Connecticut State University (CCSU), Zulma Toro, noted in a public statement rightly disavowing an incendiary message from anti-Israel students how “deeply upsetting” she found “the recent tragedies in the Middle East.”  One would not know from her statement what these tragedies were, who were their victims, and who was responsible for them.

The president of the University of Connecticut, Radenka Maric, called the attack on Israel “horrific,” but then described it generically, as a form of “hate, violence, and conflict” like that which afflicts “society” today.

Worse was the puerile rhetoric of “Yalies4Palestine.”  In the world of fantasy the Yale students inhabit, Gaza has been an “open-air prison” since the Israelis left it in 2005, notwithstanding Israel supplying Gazans with food, electricity, and other essential commodities, excluding only those with military purposes, such as cement for tunnels dug under the border with Israel. Not surprisingly, the students’ statement said nothing about the 1,200 Gazan children forced by Hamas to construct these tunnels who were killed when some of them collapsed.

From Terrence Cheng, the Chancellor of the Connecticut State University System, there was silence.

By the end of that week the only formal entity on a Connecticut college campus I am aware of to respond honestly and fairly to the Hamas invasion was the Committee on Anti-Semitism and Education at CCSU, which rightly denounced it as an atrocity.  President Toro deserves credit for having created the committee.

There are lessons one can draw from the Hamas invasion that are relevant to higher education in Connecticut and in America.  It makes nonsense of the conventional wisdom in academia that speech is violence, and that speech that makes one feel unsafe can be prohibited.  Everyone in Israel knows what real violence is.

No less welcome would be an awareness that America and its allies, such as Israel, are not the instigators of the evils – racism, imperialism, colonialism — that are claimed to afflict the world today.  In comparison to the rest of the world, they are exemplars of moral virtue.  It is Iran, not the United States or Israel, where the government publicly hangs homosexuals from construction cranes, and shoots women in the streets for removing the hijabs obscuring their faces.  And it is Gaza and the West Bank where Hamas and the Palestinian Authority arrest, torture, and execute political opponents.  No one does this in the United States or Israel.

Should students in Connecticut and around the country learn these lessons from the atrocities of which Hamas is incontestably guilty, the deaths of their victims will not have been entirely in vain. This would be small consolation for their grieving families and friends.  But in times like these, when the worst of what human beings are capable is being demonstrated so horrifically, it would be something to be grateful for.

Jay Bergman is Professor of History at Central Connecticut State University and serves on the Board of Directors of the National Association of Scholars