More Money than Greg

posted in: All news | 0

As of January, the Texas governor had about $105,000,000 sitting in his campaign account. That’s an impressively gargantuan figure, especially so given that he was forced to deplete nearly his entire cash cache four years ago in a reelection fight against two hard-line primary challengers and, then, an equally well-funded Democratic opponent, Beto O’Rourke. 

As Greg Abbott nears the end of three terms, or a dozen years, and sits at the apex of political power in Texas, the one thing that’s known about him is he loves to solicit campaign funds. (Whether it’s a matter of skill or inertia is undetermined.) He has a long callsheet of hundred-millionaire and billionaire buddies. Since Abbott got into state politics in the mid-’90s as a state Supreme Court justice, and later as attorney general on his way to the governor’s mansion, he’s raised roughly half a billion dollars.

Abbott’s warchest, which formally operates as Texans for Greg Abbott, is at this point a political clearinghouse combined with an investment firm. His campaign regularly invests donors’ contributions into U.S. Treasury notes and CDs from banks. (Yes, this is, per the state’s campaign finance laws, legal, so long as the funds are not converted for personal use.) In 2026, Abbott raised about $42 million and purchased more than $30 million in investments—mostly in T-bills. He also earned a return of over $40 million, campaign finance records show. Not bad for a public servant. 

Abbott’s warchest eclipses all other political entities’ in Texas—Tim Dunn’s machine, Dan Patrick’s operation, the major PACs like Texans for Lawsuit Reform, and the measly Texas GOP itself. This fundraising prowess has been built on the burgeoning power of his own office—which just two men have held for practically the entire century. His imperial governorship demands tribute from the state’s capitalist class, which he converts into control over the political party that might put any challengers in power.

Abbott arrives to speak during a 2022 election night party in McAllen. (AP Photo/David J. Phillip)

The governor’s fortune has obviously protected his own reelections. But increasingly, he’s also wielded that money to expand the realm of his political influence: for instance, using it as a bludgeon to oust GOP legislators at odds with his school voucher agenda; to target any fellow Republican who stands in the way on his vision to “abolish” school property taxes; or to engage in sidequests that—while not a first-order electoral necessity—are more about asserting his dominance and exploiting Dems’ weaknesses. 

While Abbott’s campaign team is known for treating every campaign as a do-or-die race, no matter the strength of the opponent, his overflowing coffers also allow him to explore other avenues. Most notably this cycle in Harris County, the largest pillar of Democrats’ state power. 

In November, he began teasing his plan to make flipping Harris County his top priority, committing to spend at least $25 million of his campaign cash on the initiative. “I’m going to spend most of [my campaign funds] in Harris County, Texas, to make sure, precinct by precinct, we turn out voters who voted in the presidential election, turn out voters who never voted before,” Abbott said. “We got to win Harris County and make Harris County dark red.”

Abbott has repeatedly singled out Houston and Harris County, now even a greater bête noire than Austin it seems, in the broader legislative fight over state supremacy and local control, and he appears to be accelerating that battle with threats to take over local elections administration from county officials. 

Home to one of every six Texans, the county has trended blue in the past two decades and solidified as such in 2016. Abbott narrowly carried it in 2014, but he since lost the county decisively in the past two gubernatorial contests. However, Democrats have suffered declining margins there, to a limited extent in 2022 and to a panic-inducing degree in 2024, while Republicans have poured more and more money into downballot races. In ’24, GOP PACs spent millions to successfully flip key judicial seats, as Dems held on by a hair to the county judgeship and the DA’s office. Kamala Harris carried the county by a mere 5 points.

Abbott’s 2026 goals include ousting all of the seven Democratic state reps who hold office in Harris County. While he certainly won’t topple them all, this sort of grandiose goal has become a hallmark of his campaign strategy—one focused less on winning his own campaigns and more on expanding the Overton window of red Texas. As usual, his longtime political consigliere Dave Carney is the one stirring the cauldron: “We have more than enough voters in Harris County to win,” Carney has projected

This mirrors similar electoral objectives that Abbott set out for himself ahead of previous reelections. In 2022, he vowed to win more than half of the Hispanic vote in Texas. While he failed in that lofty goal, his machine helped to facilitate electoral shifts in South Texas that have sent Democrats reeling. Exit polling from 2024 showed Donald Trump handily winning the Texas Latino vote.

After Abbott easily swatted away O’Rourke’s ’22 governor bid, when the El Paso Democrat actually was able to compete dollar for dollar, there was a short line of Dem challengers, even in what’s expected to be a blue-wave year, this time around. His likely opponent, Austin state Representative Gina Hinojosa, reported $1.3 million in fundraising since she launched her campaign late last year ($300,000 of that being a loan from herself and her husband). 

By comparison, as the Texas Tribune noted, Abbott hauled in more than that from a single donor: Javaid Anwar, a Midland oilman who has quietly become the governor’s largest benefactor. Like many of Abbott’s largest contributors, Anwar is a gubernatorial appointee, in this case to the Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board. He has also, like other big donors, financed private jet travel for the governor and his entourage—in Anwar’s case, covering the travel costs to a UT football game at Ohio State in August. 

And Abbott has many more megadonors, who comprise the largest titans of industry in Texas (and, in some cases, other states). More than 40 individuals, couples, or entities have given Governor Abbott $1 million-plus, with several dozen more in the high six figures. For every Javaid Anwar, there are a few Kelcy Warrens, the pipeline mogul who first cut a $1 million check after the devastating winter storm of 2021. 

As for Texas Democrats, beyond George Soros and the fickle whims of the national Democratic apparatus, they can’t count on anywhere near that degree of big-money support. In recent cycles, more than enough money has funneled into O’Rourke and Colin Allred in the latter’s 2024 Senate bid—all to no avail. But there’s no warlord like Abbott, secure in his own position, to strategically divvy up the excess patronage. The cash essentially dried up after the ballot’s top slot. The Soros-backed Texas Majority PAC, which is attempting to play a role along these lines, has yet to bear fruit.

Money isn’t everything in politics. But an almost unlimited ability to collect it, paired with the discretion to dispatch it at will, is certainly something Democrats will continue to struggle against—for however many years, or decades, Abbott hangs on to power.

The post More Money than Greg appeared first on The Texas Observer.

FedEx joins other US companies in seeking a refund after Trump tariffs are ruled illegal

posted in: All news | 0

By MICHELLE CHAPMAN, AP Business Writer

FedEx is suing the U.S. government, requesting a full refund on what it paid for tariffs set by President Donald Trump last year after the Supreme Court ruled that the tariffs are illegal.

Related Articles


World shares are mixed after heavy selling of potential AI losers hits Wall Street


Home Depot tops expectations in the fourth quarter, but customers pull back on spending


In downtown St. Paul, Aldi seeks permits to move into former Lunds & Byerlys


Mr. Clean retires after 68 years as company mascot


Small-town Minnesota wine gets international attention

FedEx said in a filing with the U.S. Court of International Trade that they have “suffered injury” from having to pay the tariffs and that the relief they’re seeking from the court would redress those injuries.

Other companies have already launched efforts to recoup costs from the illegal tariffs, including large U.S. corporations like Costco and Revlon.

The National Retail Federation said in a statement on Friday that the Supreme Court’s ruling provided certainty for U.S. businesses and manufacturers.

“We urge the lower court to ensure a seamless process to refund the tariffs to U.S. importers,” it said. “The refunds will serve as an economic boost and allow companies to reinvest in their operations, their employees and their customers.”

The Supreme Court struck down President Donald Trump’s far-reaching global tariffs on Friday. Trump said he was “absolutely ashamed” of some justices who ruled 6-3 against him, calling them “disloyal to our Constitution” and “lapdogs.” At one point he even raised the specter of foreign influence without citing any evidence.

The court’s ruling found tariffs that Trump imposed under an emergency powers law were unconstitutional, including the sweeping “reciprocal” tariffs he levied on nearly every other country.

The Treasury had collected more than $133 billion from the import taxes the president has imposed under the emergency powers law as of December, federal data shows. The impact over the next decade has been estimated at some $3 trillion.

President Donald Trump leaves after an event to proclaim “Angel Family Day” in the East Room of the White House, Monday, Feb. 23, 2026, in Washington. (AP Photo/Alex Brandon)

Trump has vowed to collect tariffs through other means. He reached for a stopgap option immediately after his defeat Friday at the Supreme Court: Section 122 of the Trade Act of 1974 allows the president to impose tariffs of up to 15% for up to 150 days. But any extension beyond 150 days must be approved by a Congress likely to balk at passing a tax increase as November’s midterm elections loom.

Robert Carradine, ‘Revenge of the Nerds’ and ‘Lizzie McGuire’ star, dies at 71

posted in: All news | 0

By LINDSEY BAHR, AP Film Writer

Robert Carradine, the youngest of his prolific Hollywood family and whose biggest hit was the 1984 comedy “Revenge of the Nerds,” has died at 71.

In a Tuesday statement to Deadline, his family said he lived with bipolar disorder for two decades and died by suicide.

“We want people to know it, and there is no shame in it,” his brother Keith Carradine told the news outlet. “It is an illness that got the best of him, and I want to celebrate him for his struggle with it, and celebrate his beautiful soul. He was profoundly gifted, and we will miss him every day.”

EDITOR’S NOTE — This story includes discussion of suicide. If you or someone you know needs help, the national suicide and crisis lifeline in the U.S. is available by calling or texting 988.

Known for both his film and television work, Robert Carradine worked steadily in the industry for over 40 years. Though he collaborated with some of the most respected directors of the day, he never gained the worldwide recognition of his more famous siblings Keith Carradine (also the father of Martha Plimpton) and half-brother David Carradine, who died in 2009.

Robert Carradine, a Los Angeles native and son to character actor John Carradine, was introduced to audiences with roles on the television series “Bonanza” in 1971 and in the John Wayne Western “The Cowboys” in 1972.

Despite his family background, acting wasn’t his first calling, though.

FILE – Robert Carradine, left, and Curtis Armstrong, co-hosts of the game show “King of the Nerds” appear at the TNT and TBS 2013 Upfront in New York on May 15, 2013. (Photo by Evan Agostini/Invision/AP, File)

“I always had a passion to be a race car driver, and that’s what I thought I was going to do, and at some penultimate moment … I think I was sitting with my brother David when ‘The Cowboys’ was being cast, and they were interested in David as the bad guy, and he didn’t want to be the guy that shot John Wayne in the back,” Carradine recalled in a 2013 interview with Popdose. “But he said, ‘You know, it is called The Cowboys, and they’re meeting all these young guys. Why don’t you go in?’”

In addition to starring in a short-lived television spinoff of “The Cowboys,” and appearing alongside David Carradine in his popular ABC series “Kung Fu,” he would go on to nab roles in Martin Scorsese’s “Mean Streets,” Hal Ashby’s Vietnam drama “Coming Home,” and Samuel Fuller’s World War II film “The Big Red One.”

The heights of his brother David’s success eluded Robert Carradine, but the two could often be seen in the same projects, including in Walter Hill’s “The Long Riders” and Paul Bartel’s “Cannonball.”

Robert Carradine’s biggest hit would come in 1984 with the off-color comedy “Revenge of the Nerds,” in which where he played head nerd Lewis Skolnick, with his abrupt, infectious and guttural laugh. He reprised the role for the big-screen sequel and two made-for-television follow-ups, and continued to pay homage to the beloved character with a guest role on the series “Robot Chicken” and as a co-host (with “Revenge of the Nerds” co-star Curtis Armstrong) of the pop culture competition show “King of the Nerds,” which aired for three seasons.

In the 2000s, Carradine gained small-screen success in The Disney Channel’s “Lizzie McGuire” as the eponymous character’s father.

“It’s really hard to face this reality about an old friend,” Hilary Duff, who played Lizzie McGuire, wrote on Instagram. “There was so much warmth in the McGuire family and I always felt so cared for by my on-screen parents. I’ll be forever grateful for that. I’m deeply sad to learn Bobby was suffering.”

Related Articles


US military boards third oil tanker in the Indian Ocean after tracking it from the Caribbean


World shares are mixed after heavy selling of potential AI losers hits Wall Street


Home Depot tops expectations in the fourth quarter, but customers pull back on spending


Today in History: February 24, Jerry Falwell loses to Larry Flynt at the Supreme Court


Governor orders flags at half-staff two days this week to honor Rev. Jesse Jackson

Work remained consistent even if the projects diminished in prestige and quality. Then Quentin Tarantino, ever the champion of fading character actors, cast Carradine in “Django Unchained” as one of the trackers in the 2012 film after seeing a “very furry” photograph, as Carradine told Popdose.

In 2015, Carradine was cited for a Colorado crash that injured him and his wife, Edith. They later divorced, after more than 25 years of marriage.

Carradine’s survivors include his three children, actor Ever Carradine, Marika Reed Carradine and Ian Alexander Carradine.

“Whenever anyone asks me how I turned out so normal, I always tell them it’s because of my dad. I knew my dad loved me, I knew it deep in my bones, and I always knew he had my back,” Ever Carradine wrote on Instagram. “I think it’s partly because we basically grew up together. Twenty years age difference really isn’t that much, and while I never ever thought of him as a sibling, I did always think of him as my partner. We were in it together.”

Utah judge is set to rule on disqualifying prosecutors in the Charlie Kirk case

posted in: All news | 0

By HANNAH SCHOENBAUM

SALT LAKE CITY (AP) — A Utah judge is expected to decide Tuesday whether to keep prosecutors on the murder case against Tyler Robinson, the man accused of killing conservative activist Charlie Kirk on a Utah college campus.

Prosecutors plan to seek the death penalty against Robinson, 22, who is charged with aggravated murder in the Sept. 10 shooting on the Utah Valley University campus in Orem. Robinson has not yet entered a plea.

Related Articles


US military boards third oil tanker in the Indian Ocean after tracking it from the Caribbean


World shares are mixed after heavy selling of potential AI losers hits Wall Street


Home Depot tops expectations in the fourth quarter, but customers pull back on spending


Today in History: February 24, Jerry Falwell loses to Larry Flynt at the Supreme Court


Governor orders flags at half-staff two days this week to honor Rev. Jesse Jackson

State District Judge Tony Graf has been weighing whether to disqualify the Utah County Attorney’s Office from continuing to prosecute the case.

Robinson’s attorneys argue that Chad Grunander, a deputy county attorney working on the case, has a conflict of interest because his adult daughter was in the audience when Kirk was shot.

An estimated 3,000 people were at the outdoor rally to hear Kirk when he was struck while taking questions. A co-founder of Turning Point USA, Kirk helped mobilize young people to vote for President Donald Trump.

Grunander’s daughter, whose identity has not been disclosed to news media covering the case, testified in court that she did not record video of the shooting or the aftermath. She was looking at the crowd and did not learn until after she ran to safety that it was Kirk who had been shot, she told the court earlier this month.

Robinson’s attorneys also argue in court documents that prosecutors were quick to announce their intent to seek the death penalty, which they say is evidence of “strong emotional reactions” that merit disqualification of the entire team.

Utah County Attorney Jeffrey Gray testified this month that he thought about seeking the death penalty before an arrest had been made in the case, and his colleague’s daughter in no way influenced the decision.

FILE – Fourth District Court Judge Tony Graf speaks during a waiver hearing for Tyler Robinson, the man accused of killing Charlie Kirk, in Utah County Court in Provo, Utah, Sept. 29, 2025. (Laura Seitz/The Deseret News via AP, Pool, File)

Graf could decide to keep prosecutors on the case, dismiss them all or dismiss only Grunander.

If Utah County prosecutors are disqualified, the case would likely shift to prosecutors in a county with enough resources to handle a big case, such as Salt Lake County, or possibly the state attorney general’s office, Utah Prosecution Council Director Robert Church has said.

The judge has been weighing other issues of fairness for Robinson, should he go to trial.

FILE – Tyler Robinson, who is accused of fatally shooting Charlie Kirk, sits beside defense attorney Kathryn Nester during a hearing in 4th District Court in Provo, Utah, Jan. 16, 2026. (Bethany Baker/The Salt Lake Tribune via AP, Pool, File)

Full video recordings of Kirk’s shooting have not been shown in court after defense attorneys objected out of concern that the footage would undermine Robinson’s right to a fair trial.

Defense attorneys also seek to keep TV cameras and photographers out of the courtroom, arguing that “highly biased” news outlets risk tainting the case. Prosecutors, attorneys for news organizations and Kirk’s widow have urged Graf to keep the proceedings open.

Associated Press writer Mead Gruver contributed from Fort Collins, Colorado.