Trump explains away not ordering half-mast flag honors for Melissa Hortman

posted in: All news | 0

President Donald Trump defended his order that flags be lowered to half-staff after last week’s slaying of conservative activist Charlie Kirk by suggesting he would have done the same following the assassination of a Minnesota Democratic state lawmaker this summer had he been asked by the state’s governor.

That’s despite Trump saying at the time that he had no interest in calling Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz.

During an unrelated Oval Office event where he announced that he was deploying the National Guard to Memphis, Trump was asked why he signed an order lowering flags nationwide after Kirk’s killing during an event in Utah, but didn’t do so after former Democratic state House Speaker Melissa Hortman and her husband were shot and killed in June.

Trump replied, “Well, if the governor had asked me to do that, I would have done that.”

“But the governor of Minnesota didn’t ask me,” the president said.

He continued, “I wouldn’t have thought of that. But I would have if somebody had asked me,” and added: “Had the governor asked me to do that, I would have done that gladly.”

Trump said during the same event that he planned to attend Kirk’s funeral this weekend in Arizona and added that he’d likely be speaking.

“I guess I’ll say a few words, I don’t know,” he said. “But I guess I will.”

Walz’s spokesperson did not reply to messages Monday evening seeking comment on the president’s remarks, and whether Walz had requested the White House to order that flags be lowered across the country after Hortman’s assassination.

However, Trump’s assertions omit the fact that — days after Hortman and her husband were shot dead in their home in the northern Minneapolis suburbs — the president was asked if he would be calling Walz. Trump suggested that doing so would “waste time.”

Presidents often reach out to governors, mayors and other elected officials at times of tragedy, such as after mass killings or natural disasters, to offer condolences and, if needed, federal assistance. But Trump said then that Walz, the Democratic vice presidential nominee against Trump in last year’s election, was “slick.”

“I think the governor of Minnesota is so whacked out. I’m not calling him. Why would I call him?” Trump told reporters aboard Air Force One in June. He then added, “The guy doesn’t have a clue” and “he’s a mess. So, you know, I could be nice and call him but why waste time?”

Teddy Tschann, a spokesperson for Walz, responded at the time with a statement saying, “Governor Walz wishes that President Trump would be a President for all Americans, but this tragedy isn’t about Trump or Walz.”

During the campaign, Walz often branded Trump and other Republican politicians as “just weird.”

Related Articles


Minneapolis suburb’s candidates campaign amid fear and violence after political assassinations


Rep. Zack Stephenson succeeds Melissa Hortman as House DFL caucus leader


Committee begins to revisit Capitol security in wake of Hortman assassination


Hennepin County grand jury indicts Vance Boelter on first-degree murder charges


Xp Lee wins primary for Melissa Hortman’s seat; White Bear Lake mayor primary results in

Trump wouldn’t call Minnesota governor after Democrat was slain but now blames him for raised flags

posted in: All news | 0

By WILL WEISSERT and STEVE KARNOWSKI

WASHINGTON (AP) — President Donald Trump claimed Monday that he would have ordered flags lowered to half-staff following the assassination of a Minnesota Democratic state lawmaker this summer had he been asked by the state’s governor. But Trump at the time refused to even call Democratic Gov. Tim Walz to express his condolences, saying it would only “waste time.”

Related Articles


Trump administration joins Republicans’ campaign to police speech in reaction to Kirk’s murder


The Democratic Party is in fits over Mamdani’s bid for NYC mayor. Republicans are loving it


What to know after US says it has reached framework deal with China to keep TikTok in operation


Fingerprint on rifle scope matches man accused of trying to assassinate Trump, FBI analyst testifies


Shutdown talk heats up as Democrats insist on stopping health care cuts

Trump made the remark during an unrelated Oval Office event as he defended his decision to lower U.S. flags after last week’s slaying of conservative activist Charlie Kirk.

After announcing that he was deploying the National Guard to Memphis, Trump was asked Monday why he signed an order lowering flags nationwide after Kirk’s killing during an event in Utah, but didn’t do so after former Democratic state House Speaker Melissa Hortman and her husband were shot and killed in June.

Trump replied, “Well, if the governor had asked me to do that, I would have done that.”

“But the governor of Minnesota didn’t ask me,” the president said.

He continued, “I wouldn’t have thought of that. But I would have if somebody had asked me,” and added: “Had the governor asked me to do that, I would have done that gladly.”

Walz’s spokesperson did not immediately comment on the president’s remarks.

But Walz tweeted a video call for unity on Monday evening that featured references to Hortman’s assassination and the recent shooting at a Minneapolis Catholic church that killed two students and injured 21 people. The video included feel-good scenes from the recent Minnesota State Fair but didn’t mention Kirk.

Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz speaks outside the Annunciation Catholic School following a shooting Wednesday, Aug. 27, 2025, in Minneapolis. (AP Photo/Bruce Kluckhohn)

“The world feels crazy right now, but we won’t lose hope. We will get through this, together,” Walz said.

Trump’s assertions omitted the fact that — days after Hortman and her husband were shot dead in their home in the northern Minneapolis suburbs — the president was asked if he’d be calling Walz. Trump suggested that doing so would “waste time.”

Presidents often reach out to governors, mayors and other elected officials at times of tragedy, such as after mass killings or natural disasters, to offer condolences and, if needed, federal assistance. But Trump said then that Walz, the Democratic vice presidential nominee against Trump in last year’s election, was “slick.”

“I think the governor of Minnesota is so whacked out. I’m not calling him. Why would I call him?” Trump told reporters aboard Air Force One in June. He then added, “The guy doesn’t have a clue” and “he’s a mess. So, you know, I could be nice and call him but why waste time?”

Teddy Tschann, a spokesperson for Walz, responded at the time with a statement saying, “Governor Walz wishes that President Trump would be a President for all Americans, but this tragedy isn’t about Trump or Walz.”

Trump also said Monday that he planned to attend Kirk’s funeral this weekend in Arizona and added that he’d likely be speaking.

“I guess I’ll say a few words, I don’t know,” he said. “But I guess I will.”

Karnowski reported from Minneapolis.

Tuesday special election will determine balance of power in MN House

posted in: All news | 0

Voters will decide whether the Minnesota House will return to a 67-67 tie between Democrats and Republicans or remain a Republican majority in a special election on Tuesday.

The northwest metro House District 34B has been vacant since the June assassination of Democratic-Farmer Labor representative and former House Speaker Melissa Hortman.

DFLer Xp Lee won his party’s nomination in the special primary election for the seat on Aug. 12, besting three other candidates. He faces Republican Ruth Bittner in Tuesday’s special election.

Lee is a former member of the Brooklyn Park City Council. Bittner is a real estate agent who has not held office.

Lee received around 59% of the 2,000 votes cast in the Aug. 12 special primary. Bittner did not have any competition and received 200 total votes in the GOP primary.

It’s expected that District 34B will remain in DFL hands and will bring the Minnesota House back to a tie between the parties. The district includes Brooklyn Park as well as parts of Champlin and Coon Rapids.

Hortman was first elected to the House in 2004 and was in her 11th term in the Legislature. She was elected speaker of the House in 2019, when the DFL took a majority in the House and continued to lead her party in the House after they lost the majority in 2025.

Hortman handily won reelection in District 34B and past districts that covered a similar footprint. In 2024, she won reelection with 63% of the vote.

In the early morning hours of June 14, Hortman and her husband, Mark, were shot at their home by a gunman who was reportedly targeting state lawmakers. State Sen. John Hoffman and his wife, Yvette, were shot at their home in Champlin and survived.

That has left the House split 67-66 with the Republicans at a one-seat advantage for three months — though the Legislature has not been in session, and the House can’t pass any bills without DFL support because the threshold to do so is 68 votes.

Minnesota’s Senate is in a similar situation. DFLers have 33 seats to Republicans’ 32 in that chamber, but 34 votes are needed to pass legislation.

Before two vacancies this summer due to the unexpected death of Sen. Bruce Anderson, R-Buffalo, and the felony conviction of another member, Sen. Nicole Mitchell, DFL-Woodbury, the DFL had a 34-33 advantage.

If the governor makes good on his plan to bring lawmakers back to the Capitol for a potential special session on gun control this fall, any proposals that reach his desk will need bipartisan support.

Related Articles


Hemmingsen-Jaeger wins DFL primary for Nicole Mitchell seat in Woodbury


Tuesday primary to pick DFL nominee for former Sen. Nicole Mitchell’s seat


Xp Lee wins primary for Melissa Hortman’s seat; White Bear Lake mayor primary results in


Republican joins 2 DFLers in race for Nicole Mitchell’s former Senate seat


Gov. Tim Walz calls special elections for 2 vacant Senate seats

Growing protests pose the most serious challenge yet to Serbia’s populist president

posted in: All news | 0

By DUSAN STOJANOVIC

BELGRADE, Serbia (AP) — Serbian President Aleksandar Vucic is escalating his crackdown on protests that have shaken his populist rule in recent months. What began as a small, student-led campaign against corruption has snowballed into one of the most turbulent protest waves in the Balkan country in a quarter of a century.

Related Articles


Trump says the US military again targeted a boat allegedly carrying drugs from Venezuela


Brazil’s Lula pushes back against tariff, tells Trump the country’s democracy ‘is not on the table’


Nvidia violated antimonopoly laws, China says


Immigrants deported from US to Ghana are sent home, where lawyers say some could face torture


British politicians condemn Elon Musk’s comments at anti-migrant rally

Rights groups and Vucic’s political opponents have warned of increasingly brutal tactics aimed at silencing a movement that has become the biggest challenge yet to his decade-long grip on power.

Last week, tanks rolled through the capital, Belgrade, in preparation for a military parade on Sept. 20. If the parade becomes a flashpoint for unrest, protesters fear the military could remain on the streets.

Vucic’s nationalist background

Vucic has ruled Serbia for more than a decade, reshaping its politics while drawing accusations of corruption and authoritarianism.

Russian President Vladimir Putin, right, and Serbian President Aleksandar Vucic pose for a photo during their meeting at Diaoyutai State Guesthouse in Beijing, China, Tuesday, Sept. 2, 2025. (Alexander Kazakov,Sputnik, Kremlin Pool Photo via AP)

He began his political career in the 1990s as a hardline nationalist in the Serbian Radical Party, becoming information minister under the late Serbian strongman Slobodan Milosevic. He was notorious for his calls to punish independent media and his wartime rhetoric against Serbia’s neighbors which he maintains to this day.

Serbia was defeated in the wars in the Balkans, Milosevic was ousted by a wave of protests in October 2000, and Vucic reinvented himself as a pro-European reformer. He co-founded the Serbian Progressive Party, which promised modernization and EU integration, but he consolidated his power through populism, control of the media, and a tight grip on state institutions.

How the latest unrest started

On Nov. 1, 2024, a canopy collapsed at the railway station in the northern city of Novi Sad, killing at least 16 people. The tragedy, tied to a Chinese-backed renovation project, sparked outrage over alleged state-run corruption and negligence.

University students were the first to protest, blocking traffic every Friday for 15 minutes in memory of the dead.

But the anger over corruption quickly resonated beyond campuses, drawing crowds of ordinary citizens frustrated with rising costs of living and a sense of impunity among ruling-party elites.

Protesters now demand accountability, transparency, and early elections.

Why the protests turned violent

At first, the demonstrations were peaceful marches and sit-ins. But tensions rose when authorities deployed riot police, plainclothes officers and even shady parapolice units, led by soccer hooligans loyal to Vucic, to disperse the gatherings with batons, sticks and flares.

Led by university students, people attend a protest against increasing police brutality in Belgrade, Serbia, Monday, Sept. 8, 2025. (AP Photo/Darko Vojinovic)

Protesters reported beatings, arbitrary arrests, and the use of tear gas, stun grenades and sonic devices — tactics that rights groups have condemned as brutal and excessive.

The harsh response from the authorities has fueled defiance. Students have escalated their actions by blocking major intersections, occupying university halls, and staging sit-ins outside state institutions. Each new crackdown has drawn more people into the streets, creating a cycle of confrontation.

And while previous waves of protests petered out over a disputed property development, allegations of stolen elections and two mass shootings, this time the protests have built up over time. Crucially, they spread beyond Belgrade to dozens of cities and small towns across the country.

Vucic’s response

Vucic has repeatedly branded the student protesters as “terrorists” who are working in conjunction with Western powers to remove him from office, without presenting any evidence. Although he has called for a dialogue with the students, he has refused to call early elections and warned of an even harsher response to the protests.

Students flatly rejected the offer of talks before early elections. In response to the student demands, authorities sacked more than 100 teachers, professors and deans and replaced them with Vucic’s loyalists.

While some schools have reopened with new staff, others have remained closed, especially some of the university faculties.

A strategic position between East and West

While under intense domestic pressure, Vucic continued projecting Serbia’s foreign diplomacy as balanced, managing complex relations with both the European Union and his authoritarian allies, most notably Russia.

Serbian army helicopters MI-35 fly over the city ahead of a military parade scheduled for Sept. 20 in the Serbian capital Belgrade, Friday, Sept. 12, 2025. (AP Photo/Darko Vojinovic)

He attended a summit on Sept.1 with leaders from China, Russia, North Korea and Iran, where he said he received their support in dealing with the protests at home. He has also refused to join international sanctions against Russia for its invasion of Ukraine.

However, he has also made no move to block Serbian exports of weapons to Ukraine and earlier this year, he made his first-ever visit to Kyiv, signaling a willingness to engage with Western-aligned nations.

Serbia has been a candidate for EU membership since 2012, but negotiations have made slow progress.

Europe’s muted reaction

Vucic’s tenure is marked by a centralization of power, suppression of dissent, and tight control over the media, drawing scrutiny from human rights organizations.

He has openly advocated the closure of the last remaining independent TV outlets, N1 and Nova, or a purge of reporters and management. He has called them liars for their coverage of the protests, although they mainly broadcast live, with minimal intervention from editors or commentators.

Analysts and opposition groups argue that Europe must increase the pressure on Serbia to prevent its further democratic erosion.

EU officials have warned Vucic that progress toward EU membership depends on meeting certain standards, including reforms in the judiciary, media freedoms and fight against corruption.

A Serbian Army soldier prepares ahead of a military parade scheduled for Sept. 20 in the Serbian capital Belgrade, Friday, Sept. 12, 2025. (AP Photo/Darko Vojinovic)

At a time when Europe is dealing with the repercussions of Russia’s war in Ukraine, the EU has so far shown little willingness to confront Vucic and his government.

The Serbian opposition and some EU lawmakers believe the EU’s reaction has been too timid because officials believe Vucic is the only one who can preserve peace in a region still reeling from a series of wars in the 1990s that left over 100,000 people dead and millions homeless.

High stakes

The anti-graft rallies have become more than just a fight against corruption. They are now a direct challenge to Vucic’s heavy-handed rule, with demonstrators demanding free elections, independent judiciary and accountability for police violence.

With neither side showing signs of backing down, Serbia faces a deepening political crisis and the risk of further unrest and even bloodshed.

Jovana Gec in Belgrade contributed to this report.