Marc Lore, Alex Rodriguez say ‘We’re going to be the owners of the Minnesota Timberwolves’ despite Glen Taylor’s statement

posted in: News | 0

In an interview with Sportico, Marc Lore and Alex Rodriguez said Timberwolves owner Glen Taylor showed “complete and utter disregard for the contract” when he put out a statement Thursday saying the team was no longer for sale.

“We’re going to be the owners of the Minnesota Timberwolves,” Lore told Sportico on Friday. “It’s just a matter of time, and how much pain Glen wants to put the fans, the players, the town and community through. It’s his choice. It didn’t have to be this way.”

Taylor said because Lore and Rodriguez didn’t have the money to complete the final portion of the deal that would’ve made the duo controlling owners by March 27, the deal was off.

“We reminded them that we needed the material, the NBA reminded them that they needed the material,” Taylor told the Pioneer Press, “and they didn’t really do it.”

Lore and Rodriguez said they did have the money and had submitted their commitments on March 21 — six days ahead of the deadline — and simply needed to wait for NBA protocols to run their course. The duo reportedly added Blue Owl Capital’s Blue Owl HomeCourt as a partner in the deal last week.

“We have fulfilled our obligations, and have all necessary funding and are fully committed to closing our purchase of the team as soon as the NBA completes its approval process,” Lore and Rodriguez said in a statement Thursday. “Glen Taylor’s statement is an unfortunate case of seller’s remorse that is short-sighted and disruptive to the team and the fans during a historic winning season.”

There is a clause in the original purchase agreement that notes an automatic triggering of a 90-day extension for the NBA to complete its approval process.

Thursday’s Timberwolves statement read: “Under certain circumstances, Lore and Rodriguez could have been entitled to a limited extension. However, those circumstances did not occur.”

Taylor assumed legal recourse from Lore and Rodriguez was a possibility.

“I’ve never sued anyone; I’ve never been sued,” Lore told Sportico, “but we’re dealing with someone that is very comfortable operating that way, and we have to take whatever actions are necessary to protect our childhood dream here.”

The deal was originally agreed to at a $1.5 billion purchase price in 2021, with a payment plan in place to play out over the following two-plus years. At the time, that appeared to be a low price for an NBA franchise. Rodriguez and Lore currently own 36 percent of the team.

Taylor assumed Lore and Rodriguez would remain on as limited partners. Sportico currently values the franchise at $3 billion.

“Because they bought in at a very favorable price, which is smart of them that they did it, and I agreed to it,” he said. “So, to me, they should probably keep their investment. I think it’s a really good investment.”

Lore and Rodriguez told Sportico that Taylor told team leadership to not speak with the tandem.

Taylor said the partnership hasn’t gone the way he believed it would when the agreement was reached in 2021, noting Lore has been immersed in his food service company, Wonder — “so he’s kind of excluded himself” — and Rodriguez was “not inclined to get involved in a lot of these things, business-wise.”

“I just thought maybe they’d get more involved, and they chose not to. That was fine with me,” Taylor said. “I’m used to making the decisions. So it didn’t turn out maybe the way I thought it was going to be, but I don’t feel bad about it, because I love making the decisions.”

Taylor has had final say on all team decisions over the past three years, but Lore and Rodriguez were integral in bringing in president of basketball operations Tim Connelly. They also created a new owner’s suite in the back hallways of Target Center near the home team locker room where Lore and Rodriguez often reside pregame.

“I mean, that was more of their priority that they had that room than, ‘Who are we trading for?’” Taylor told The Athletic.

“Think about it from our end: If we had an ironclad agreement, like we do, would we be talking about how Marc and Alex are more worried about the owner’s suite than making real (basketball) trades?” Rodriguez told Sportico. “It’s so … childish. But you only do that when you don’t have any ground to sit on.”

The Hold Steady to release illustrated children’s book in October

posted in: News | 0

Brooklyn-by-way-of-Minneapolis rock band the Hold Steady will release the illustrated children’s book “Stay Positive” on Oct. 1 via Akashic Books.

Based on the title track of the group’s 2008 album of the same name, the book is “a call to arms to stand strong and persevere during trying times … (and) follows the path of a humble armadillo who discovers along the way how music can pull together a disparate cast of characters,” according to a press release.

Brooklyn-by-way-of-Minneapolis rock band the Hold Steady will release a children’s book based on the song “Stay Positive” from their 2008 album of the same name. (Courtesy of Akashic Books)

“Stay Positive” was illustrated by Mexican cartoonist and comic book author David “El Dee” Espinosa.

Said lead singer Craig Finn: “‘Stay Positive’ has a line that says, ‘The kids at the shows will have kids of their own’ and it’s true. Each year more Hold Steady fans become parents or grandparents. So, I’m thrilled that we’re offering the children’s book version of ‘Stay Positive,’ which brings THS joy to the whole family.”

The book follows last year’s publication of “The Gospel of the Hold Steady: How a Resurrection Really Feels,” an oral history written by Michael Hann and the band.

Autographed copies of “Stay Positive,” and a package that includes a custom water bottle and stickers, are available for preorder at akashicbooks.com.

Hold Steady in concert

The Hold Steady’s summer tour plans include a July 20 stop at the Minnesota Yacht Club festival on a bill that also includes Red Hot Chili Peppers, the Offspring and locals Hippo Campus and Soul Asylum.

Tickets start at $135 and are available from minnesotayachtclubfestival.com.

Related Articles

Music and Concerts |


Zach McCormick has taken over the midday shift at 89.3 The Current

Music and Concerts |


Photographer’s new book offers a unique look at Aretha Franklin

Music and Concerts |


Album review: Justin Timberlake is a man out of time on ‘Everything I Thought It Was’

Music and Concerts |


Soulful singer Teddy Swims lets his guard down with new music

Music and Concerts |


Sarah Tomlinson blends rock music, celebrity and ghostwriting in debut novel

DA suggests Donald Trump violated gag order with post about daughter of hush-money trial judge

posted in: Politics | 0

NEW YORK — Manhattan prosecutors suggested Friday that Donald Trump violated a gag order in his hush-money criminal case this week by assailing the judge’s daughter and making a false claim about her on social media.

The Manhattan district attorney’s office asked Judge Juan M. Merchan to “clarify or confirm” the scope of the gag order, which he issued on Tuesday, and to direct the former president and presumptive Republican nominee to “immediately desist from attacks on family members.”

In a letter to Merchan, Assistant District Attorney Joshua Steinglass argued that the gag order’s ban on statements meant to interfere with or harass the court’s staff or their families makes the judge’s daughter off-limits from Trump’s rhetoric. He said Trump should be punished for further violations.

Trump’s lawyers contend the DA’s office is misinterpreting the order and that it doesn’t prohibit him from commenting about Loren Merchan, a political consultant whose firm has worked on campaigns for Trump’s rival Joe Biden and other Democrats.

“The Court cannot ‘direct’ President Trump to do something that the gag order does not require,” Trump’s lawyers Todd Blanche and Susan Necheles wrote. “To ‘clarify or confirm’ the meaning of the gag order in the way the People suggest would be to expand it.”

The trial, which involves allegations Trump falsified payment records in a scheme to cover up negative stories during his 2016 presidential campaign, is scheduled to begin April 15. Trump denies wrongdoing and has pleaded not guilty to 34 counts of falsifying business records.

In his posts Wednesday on his Truth Social platform, Trump wrote that Loren Merchan “makes money by working to ‘Get Trump,’” and he wrongly accused her of posting a social media photo showing him behind bars.

A spokesperson for New York’s state court system said Trump’s claim was false and that the social media account Trump was referencing no longer belonged to Loren Merchan.

The account on X, formerly known as Twitter, “is not linked to her email address, nor has she posted under that screenname since she deleted the account. Rather, it represents the reconstitution, last April, and manipulation of an account she long ago abandoned,” court spokesperson Al Baker said.

In the same Truth Social posts, Trump complained that his gag order was “illegal, un-American, unConstitutional.” He said that Judge Merchan was “wrongfully attempting to deprive me of my First Amendment Right to speak out against the Weaponization of Law Enforcement” by Democratic rivals.

The gag order, which prosecutors had requested, bars Trump from either making or directing other people to make public statements on his behalf about jurors or potential witnesses in the hush-money trial, such as his lawyer turned nemesis Michael Cohen and porn star Stormy Daniels.

The order, echoing one in Trump’s Washington, D.C., election interference criminal case, also prohibits any statements meant to interfere with or harass the court’s staff, prosecution team or their families. Trump, however, is free to criticize Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg, the elected Democrat whose office is prosecuting Trump — but Steinglass wants his family off limits, too.

In his letter, Steinglass implored the judge to “make abundantly clear” to Trump that the gag order protects his family, Bragg’s family and family members of all other individuals covered by the gag order. He urged Merchan to warn Trump “that his recent conduct is contumacious and direct him to immediately desist.”

A gag order violation could result in Trump being held in contempt of court, fined or even jailed.

Trump’s lawyers argued against any such warnings, citing constitutional concerns about restricting Trump’s speech further while he’s campaigning for president and fighting criminal charges.

Related Articles

National News |


Trudy Rubin: ISIS terror attack in Moscow and GOP obstructionists play into Putin’s hands

National News |


Chuck Slocum: Pondering a vote for president in 2024

National News |


Hurry up and wait: Trump’s classified documents case is mired in delays that may run past election

National News |


Trump evokes more anger and fear from Democrats than Biden does from Republicans, AP-NORC poll shows

National News |


Trump slow to invest in states that could decide election as some in GOP fear ‘skeleton’ campaign

Was the Apple River stabbing murder or self-defense? Trial begins Monday.

posted in: News | 0

It started with a man who said he was looking for a lost cellphone in the shallow Apple River — and ended with stabbings that left a Stillwater teen dead and four other tubers with serious injuries.

Now, nearly two years later, murder suspect Nicolae Miu will stand trial beginning Monday for the killing of 17-year-old Isaac Schuman — an act caught on cellphone video — and the wounding of three men and a woman during a chaotic river confrontation in Somerset, Wis.

Isaac Schuman, 17, of Stillwater, was stabbed to death in an altercation while tubing July 30, 2022, on the Apple River in Somerset, Wis. (Courtesy of the Schuman family)

Witnesses told authorities that Miu, now 54, had been bothering young women and girls on the popular tubing river while he was carrying goggles and a snorkel mask. But Miu said he acted to defend himself after he was attacked while searching for his friend’s lost phone that was in a waterproof floating bag.

The trial will most certainly revolve around the nearly 3½-minute cellphone video taken by Schuman’s friend Jawahn Cockfield. In a recent court filing, St. Croix County District Attorney Karl Anderson wrote “this is a unique case where the homicide is on video” and he contends the footage “rebuts (Miu’s) claims in the interview with investigators, that he was minding his own business when he was attacked, unprovoked.”

St. Croix County Circuit Judge R. Michael Waterman will preside over the trial, which is expected to last 10 days.

A question jurors will have to weigh in Miu’s claim of self-defense is this: What would a reasonable person do if confronted with the same situation?

That is the essence of Wisconsin’s self-defense law, said Minneapolis criminal defense attorney Joe Tamburino. Wisconsin does not have a specific duty to retreat as Minnesota does, but it’s part of “reasonability,” he said.

“One of the factors to determine if a person acted in self-defense — were their actions reasonable — is the consideration of could the defendant have avoided it,” said Tamburino, who is not involved in Miu’s case.

If the jury is convinced that Miu, a mechanical engineer from Prior Lake, acted reasonably after being threatened with death or bodily harm, he could be acquitted. If not, Miu could be sentenced to life in prison without the possibility of parole.

“The meat and potatoes of this is: Who started this, and was there an opportunity for (Miu) to leave?” Tamburino said. “And was the force reasonable?”

Nicolae Miu (Courtesy of the St. Croix County Sheriff’s Office)

District Attorney Anderson will be prosecuting Miu on five main charges: first-degree intentional homicide and four counts of attempted first-degree intentional homicide. A misdemeanor battery charge was added after the original criminal complaint was filed two days after the attack.

Miu is represented by two prominent Wisconsin attorneys: Aaron Nelson, who specializes in violent crimes, and Corey Chirafisi, who was co-counsel for Kyle Rittenhouse. Chirafisi helped win not-guilty verdicts for Rittenhouse in 2021 after the then-teenager testified that he fatally shot two men and injured another in self-defense during the civil unrest that followed a police shooting in Kenosha in 2020.

Miu has remained jailed in lieu of a $1 million cash bond since his arrest about a mile downstream from the stabbing site some 90 minutes later.

Caught on video

The confrontation took place around 3:45 p.m. July 30, 2022, some 100 to 200 yards upstream from the Highway 35/64 bridge in Somerset, a community famous for its river tubing, camping and partying.

Sheriff’s deputies found Schuman without vital signs, and with a puncture wound in the upper abdomen near his left breast. He was pronounced dead at Lakeview Hospital in Stillwater.

The other victims — a 24-year-old Burnsville woman, a 22-year-old Elk River man and two Luck, Wis., men ages 20 and 22 — suffered puncture or slash wounds in the abdomen or upper torso. They were taken by air and ground ambulances to Regions Hospital in St. Paul in conditions that ranged from critical to serious.

A folding pocketknife with a black handle and silver blade was found in a closed position along the west bank of the river near where the incident took place.

Witnesses said Miu was bothering a group of floating juveniles who then sought help from others floating nearby. The other group got between Miu and the juveniles and told him to leave, calling him a “child molester” and a “pedophile,” according to statements Miu and his wife gave to investigators.

Miu said that he had drunk “a lot of beer” that day, the complaint says. Miu said he told the group of angry tubers “that if he was a child molester, and they were children, they shouldn’t be drinking alcohol.”

The complaint describes some of the confrontation as captured on video, which begins with Miu running up to Schuman’s group and grabbing onto their tubes. People in the tubing party tell Miu to “get away.” He appears to look for something, walks away, turns back around and says something while pointing at the group.

Miu again walks away toward the bridge, then toward a female. The camera pans, showing more people converging toward Miu and yelling at him to get away. Someone can be heard in the video accusing him of “looking for little girls,” the complaint says.

A larger group converges toward the area. Several people yell at Miu, and it appears that at least one person touches his shoulder. “From the video it does appear to show people on three sides of Nicolae at different distances,” the complaint says. “The video and elapsed time shows opportunity for Nicolae to leave the confrontation.”

Related Articles

Crime & Public Safety |


Man and woman found fatally shot in parked car in Blaine

Crime & Public Safety |


Brittney Baker, St. Paul’s first African-American woman firefighter to reach rank of captain, ‘making sure the door never closes again’

Crime & Public Safety |


Teen gets 4 years for role in St. Paul homicide that led to ‘no-knock’ warrant at apartment where Amir Locke was shot

Crime & Public Safety |


Stillwater man used Iowa woman’s funds to pay for pool, other home improvements, authorities say

Crime & Public Safety |


Yia Xiong’s daughter says she’s ‘devastated’ by no charges against St. Paul officer in fatal shooting

Miu appears to be “confronted” by two females. He soon pulls a folding pocketknife from his cargo shorts and holds it at his side with the blade exposed, the video purportedly shows.

The camera briefly pans away from the scene just as it turned violent. When the camera pans back, it shows Miu falling into the water, followed by a young woman slapping him and a male pushing him as Miu tries to get back up.

As the male approaches to shove Miu a second time, Miu apparently stabs him in the stomach. He continues to make stabbing motions as more people approach him, according to the complaint.

As Miu ran away from the confrontation, “there was enough blood in the river that the water turned a red tint in places,” investigators wrote.

Claimed self-defense

Later that day, Miu, a mechanical engineer at Ritchie Engineering Co. in Minneapolis, spoke with sheriff’s Lt. Brandie Hart at length and described his actions as “self-defense.”

Miu said the incident started when someone in the group took his goggles and snorkel and threw them in the river, and someone else “grabbed his swim trunks and tried to pull his trunks down,” the complaint states.

Contrary to what the video appeared to show, Miu denied carrying a knife to the river. Instead, he claimed he had wrestled a knife away from one of the males who confronted him.

“Nic said he then took the knife from the individual who’d been in possession of it, and then started swinging it,” Hart wrote in the complaint. “Nic told me he was swinging the knife all around him because, ‘I wanted out.’ Nic said people were coming at him, punching him, hitting him, and circling around him. Nic said that the group was really close to him and pushing him in the river. Nic said he didn’t know what, if anything, the knife came into contact with.”

Miu told the investigator he didn’t know what happened to the people who confronted him.

“I told Nic that four individuals sustained injuries and one person died,” Hart wrote. “Nic said, ‘Oh no’ and asked if the individuals sustained injuries because they were fighting with each other, and I said I didn’t know. Nic then put his head in his hands and said, ‘Oh my god.’ Nic said his whole life was ‘down the tubes.’ Nic said he was sorry for how this ended up.”

‘No place to go’

The St. Croix County Courthouse in Hudson, Wis., where Nicolae Miu will stand trial beginning Monday for the killing of 17-year-old Isaac Schuman. (Nick Ferraro / Pioneer Press)

The next month, at Miu’s probable cause hearing, Hart said witnesses told her the incident first became violent after Miu “struck a female” in the face. She said the video does not show her being hit, but does show Miu then being pushed into the river, slapped and pushed again. She said he then pulled a knife and stabbed a tuber, which she described as a “jab” that appeared to move up the torso.

The video did not show others being stabbed, but showed Miu making stabbing motions, Hart said. After sounds of screaming, she said, Miu walked back to his wife and other tubers he had been with previously. He did not call 911.

Miu told her “he was attacked and he responded in self-defense,” Hart said. She said he stated he did not have a knife, although his wife later said that he had one with him.

Hart said Miu told her the tubers had brandished two knives, but no other ones were seen in the video besides the one Miu had with him.

Miu’s attorneys laid the groundwork for the self-defense claim. Upon questioning by Chirafisi, Hart said Miu didn’t say anything to the tubers after jogging over to them and did not yell or threaten them. He was not aggressive with them while he was turned away from them, looking for the phone, and they were yelling at him to get away.

“Is he yelling back at them?” Chirafisi asked.

“No,” she replied.

Hart said Miu had not made physical motions toward the six or so tubers who were around him before the altercation became violent.

“There’s no place for him to go at that point, agreed?” Chirafisi asked.

“Yes,” she responded.

Statement ‘didn’t add up’

In Minnesota, a claim of self-defense cannot be used if you are the first aggressor, Tamburino said. In Wisconsin, you can’t use self-defense if you are the person who provokes the attack, “so it’s a small distinction,” he said. “And it’s always a muddied area.”

Tamburino said he’s done more than 100 jury trials and talked to a lot of jurors afterward. “And here’s the biggest thing: Your first statement to police is one of the things they rely on the most, because they want to see if you change your story,” he said. “Your juries hate when people change their stories.”

In that regard, Miu’s own words will be a challenge for his attorneys, Tamburino said.

“Mr. Miu contradicts himself left and right: ‘I don’t have a knife.’ His wife said he had a knife. ‘The other people had knives.’ No other knives were found. ‘I had to take the knife from the other guy.’ That’s not on the video. He’s got a lot of problems with his statement,” he said. “I would imagine that’s one of the main reasons they charged him, because his statement just didn’t add up to the other evidence.”

Although Miu’s actions afterward — leaving the scene, not calling police — are not legal factors, “they will matter to the jury, because when you act in self-defense and you just run, it looks bad,” Tamburino said.

Retired Wisconsin defense attorney Alex Andrea said Miu is allowed to use whatever force is necessary to, as the statute says, “prevent or terminate what the person reasonably believes to be an unlawful interference.”

“What does a person who is using self-defense see, observe, reason from what’s happening?” said Andrea, who worked as a public defender out of the Hudson trial office from 1989 to 2019. “There are great lawyers out there who I respect greatly, and they might talk about another aspect, which is that you read into the statute proportionality. What is a sufficiently proportionate response to the perceived threat or harm?”

Although not necessarily an absolute defense, there is an element of provocation in the case, he said. “How would you react, how would anyone react, to that accusation (of looking at little girls)?” he said. “What is the reaction of the average juror going to be?”

Andrea noted how Miu was thrown into the water twice. “How is he going to know what they are going to do?” he said. “At a certain point, you have to wonder, are they going to let me leave? And did he have a means of egress, of escape? I don’t know.”

The video is important in that it captures what happened in real time, even if it’s only a partial reconstruction of what took place, he said. “But if you don’t, for example, hear what was said between the parties, then for all that it’s showing the jury in real time, it’s not complete, is it?” he said. “And yet, my experience has been, and I’m not alone in this, is juries tend to put a disproportionate amount of weight on a video.”

Last month, Miu’s attorneys moved to have the video excluded after 2 minutes and 25 seconds because the stabbings had happened at that point. In the alternative, they asked that the audio be muted “because it depicts raw, emotional reactions which Mr. Miu believes are unfairly prejudicial,” Judge Waterman wrote in his decision denying the motion.

“The Jawahn Cockfield video is highly probative because it captures Mr. Miu’s early interactions with the tubers, including several of the alleged victims,” the judge wrote. “It establishes time, place and manner for many of the key events, including the fatal stabbing and Mr. Miu’s claim of self-defense. It captures the aftermath of the alleged crimes, including Mr. Miu leaving the scene and the wounded behind, all of which is probative of his intent.”

Muting the audio “after 2:25 is more dangerous than playing it,” the judge wrote. “After watching and listening to more than 2 minutes of intense footage, the jury will wonder why the last 55 seconds of audio needed to be sequestered from their ears. It will invite speculation about what’s missing and the Court’s reasons for excluding it.”

Jury selection for the trial is slated to start at 8 a.m. Monday in St. Croix County Circuit Court in Hudson. Opening statements are expected to begin around 1:30 p.m. Local TV stations are planning to stream the trial live.

Related Articles

Crime & Public Safety |


Man and woman found fatally shot in parked car in Blaine

Crime & Public Safety |


Fallen crypto mogul Sam Bankman-Fried sentenced to 25 years in prison

Crime & Public Safety |


Teen gets 4 years for role in St. Paul homicide that led to ‘no-knock’ warrant at apartment where Amir Locke was shot

Crime & Public Safety |


Stillwater man used Iowa woman’s funds to pay for pool, other home improvements, authorities say

Crime & Public Safety |


Suspects plead not guilty in human smuggling case involving Indian family’s death on Canada border