Here’s what to know about Boeing agreeing to plead guilty to fraud in 737 Max crashes

posted in: News | 0

By DAVID KOENIG and ALANNA DURKIN RICHER

Boeing will have a felony conviction if it follows through on an agreement with prosecutors to plead guilty to fraud in connection with approval of its 737 Max before two of the planes crashed, killing 346 people off the coast of Indonesia and in Ethiopia.

The American aerospace giant has apparently made the calculation that admitting to a crime is better than fighting the charge and enduring a long public trial.

The plea deal is not yet a sure thing, however.

Relatives of some of the passengers who died have indicated they will ask a federal judge in Texas to throw out the agreement, which they say is too lenient considering the lives that were lost less. They want a trial, they want a huge fine, and they want Boeing leaders to face charges.

In a legal filing late Sunday — minutes before a midnight deadline — the Justice Department disclosed the agreement and said the fraud charge was “the most serious readily provable offense” it could bring against Boeing. Prosecutors say Boeing will pay another $243.6 million fine, matching a fine it paid in 2021 for the same crime.

The Justice Department says a conviction for fraud will hold Boeing accountable for “misstatements” it made to regulators who certified the 737 Max in 2017. The crashes took place less than five months apart in 2018 and 2019.

The company still faces investigations into the blowout of a panel from an Alaska Airlines Max in January, increased oversight by the Federal Aviation Administration, and accusations from current and former employees about poor workmanship and retaliation against whistleblowers.

Here is what to know about the case and what could be next for Boeing:

What did Boeing admit?

Boeing agreed to plead guilty to conspiracy to defraud the United States — in this case, deceiving the Federal Aviation Administration.

The Justice Department first filed that charge in 2021, but it agreed not to prosecute Boeing if it paid a fine and successfully completed three years of a form of corporate probation under what is called a deferred-prosecution agreement.

In May, however, the department determined that Boeing had not lived up to that agreement, setting in motion the events that led to Sunday’s plea deal.

The plea deal could help Boeing resolve a black mark on its reputation — the felony charge that the American aerospace giant deceived regulators who approved the airplane and the pilot-training requirements to fly it safely.

What did Boeing agree to do?

Boeing will pay another fine, bringing the total to $487.2 million, which the Justice Department says is the legal maximum for the fraud charge. The deal also requires the company to invest at least $455 million to improve safety. It will be on court-supervised probation for three years, and the Justice Department will name an independent monitor to oversee Boeing’s compliance with terms of the plea agreement.

Boeing’s board of directors will be required to meet with families of the victims.

Can the judge block the deal?

Yes. There will be a hearing before U.S. District Judge Reed O’Connor in Fort Worth, Texas. He can accept the agreement, in which case he can’t change terms of Boeing’s punishment. Or he can reject it, which would likely lead to new negotiations between Boeing and prosecutors. A date for the hearing has not been set.

Deals in which the defendant and the federal government agree on a sentence are controversial in legal circles.

“Judges don’t like them. They feel that it usurps their authority,” said Deborah Curtis, a former Justice Department lawyer.

O’Connor, however, has shown deference before to the Justice Department’s power. When families of the crash victims tried to undo the 2021 deferred-prosecution agreement, the judge criticized what he called “Boeing’s egregious criminal conduct” but ruled that he had no authority to overturn the settlement.

How are relatives of the crash victims reacting?

Many are outraged by the agreement.

Zipporah Kuria, a 28-year-old London woman whose father, Joseph, was on the Ethiopian Airlines Max that crashed in March 2019, wanted a trial that she thinks would have unearthed new details about what led up to the crashes.

Now, with the likelihood that there will never be a trial, “the opportunity to continue digging, the opportunity to continue finding out what has gone wrong here and what is wrong, is kind of taken away from us,” Kuria said. “So yet again, they (the victims) have been robbed of their dignity, and we have been robbed of our closure.”

Javier de Luis, an MIT aeronautics lecturer whose sister, Graziella, died in the Ethiopia crash, also finds the punishment for Boeing to be inadequate.

“If you look at the elements that make up this plea agreement, they’re pretty much typical for what you would expect to see in a white-collar fraud investigation – not in the case of a crime that led directly to the deaths of 346 people,” he said.

Nadia Milleron, a Massachusetts resident whose 24-year-old daughter, Samya Stumo, died in the same crash, wants Boeing’s current and previous CEOs to face charges.

“After the Indonesian crash, they knew that something was wrong with this plane, and they knew it could crash,” she said. “They gambled with people’s lives, and they are gambling right now.”

What effect would a conviction have on Boeing?

Boeing’s business has never fully recovered from the crashes. After the renewed scrutiny that followed the Alaska Airlines incident, the company failed to book any new orders for the Max in April and May. It has fallen even farther behind European rival Airbus in production and deliveries of new planes, which means less revenue is coming in.

All of this is happening while Boeing looks for a new CEO to replace David Calhoun, who says he will step down at the end of the year.

That said, the share price of the company’s stock rose slightly Monday.

Will Boeing lose government contracts?

Probably not.

Government contractors can be suspended or disbarred for criminal convictions, but agencies generally have leeway to grant exceptions.

Pentagon press secretary Maj. Gen. Pat Ryder said the Justice Department notified the Defense Department about Boeing’s plea deal.

The Defense Department “will assess the company’s remediation plans and agreement with the Department of Justice to make a determination as to what steps are necessary and appropriate to protect the federal government,” Ryder said.

In 2006, the Air Force cited “compelling national interest” to let Boeing keep competing for contracts even after the company admitted charges that included using stolen information to win a space-launch contract and paying a $615 million fine.

Does the plea affect other investigations into Boeing?

It would only resolve the fraud charge filed after the two deadly crashes. The FBI told passengers on the Alaska Airline Max that suffered a panel blowout while flying over Oregon that they might be victims of a crime.

The National Transportation Safety Board is also investigating that incident, and the Federal Aviation Administration is looking into Boeing’s manufacturing quality.

What happened in the crashes?

Boeing added new flight-control software to the Max that could push the nose of the plane down if a sensor indicated the plane could be approaching an aerodynamic stall. It didn’t initially tell pilots or airlines about the software, known by the acronym MCAS.

The system activated before both crashes based on faulty readings for the single sensor on each plane, according to investigations of the Oct. 29, 2018, crash of a Lion Air Max off the coast of Indonesia and the March 10, 2019, crash of an Ethiopian Airlines Max near Addis Ababa. Other factors contributed to the Lion Air crash, and the Ethiopian pilots were aware of MCAS but still couldn’t regain control after the nose began pitching down without their input.

___

Koenig reported from Dallas and Richer reported from Washington. Haleluya Hadero in South Bend, Indiana, Cathy Bussewitz in New York, and Tara Copp in Washington contributed to this report.

The White House faces many questions about Biden’s health and medical history. Here are some answers

posted in: Politics | 0

By JOSH BOAK and ZEKE MILLER

WASHINGTON (AP) — President Joe Biden’s terrible performance at the June 27 presidential debate has raised concerns about his age, health and ability to lead the federal government.

Administration officials have blamed his confused and at times indecipherable answers at the debate with Republican Donald Trump on a head cold, jet lag and poor preparation at Camp David. But at 81, Biden has found his health to be a key issue for many voters going into November’s election. White House press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre tried to address questions about the president’s health at Monday’s news briefing.

How often does the president see a doctor?

Biden has extensive yearly physical exams, Jean-Pierre said. She added that most Americans don’t understand the extent of the medical care provided to the president, as many people are lucky if they get to see their doctors once or twice a year. By contrast, the president’s medical unit is “just steps down from the residence” at the White House. “A couple times a week,” Biden does a “verbal check-in with his doctor while he’s exercising,” Jean-Pierre said, adding that he had a check-in on Monday.

There has been confusion as to whether Biden saw his doctor about his cold after the presidential debate on June 27. The White House initially said there was no medical exam, but it later said there was a “short verbal check-in” and it was determined that no exam was needed.

Has the president seen a neurologist?

“He has seen a neurologist three times,” said Jean-Pierre. “Not more than that.”

The White House spokesperson repeated the phrase “three times” in 17 instances during the Monday briefing. She stressed that all three meetings with a neurologist were tied to the president’s annual physical exams. But Jean-Pierre declined to say where Biden had seen the neurologist — whether the visits were at Walter Reed National Military Medical Center or elsewhere. “I don’t have anything to state as to location,” she said.

Have Biden’s physical exams found signs of Parkinson’s or other neurological diseases?

Not according to the most recent doctor’s letter, issued in February after Biden’s last physical. Jean-Pierre cited that document Monday in response to reporters’ questions.

That letter said “an extremely detailed neurologic exam was again reassuring” in that there were no findings consistent with a stroke, multiple sclerosis, Parkinson’s or ascending lateral sclerosis. The letter added that no tremors or “motor weakness” were detected. Written by Biden’s physician, Dr. Kevin O’Connor, the letter added that Biden “demonstrates excellent fine motor dexterity.”

Why has a neurologist specializing in Parkinson’s visited the White House?

Visitor logs show that Dr. Kevin Cannard, a neurologist who has conducted research into Parkinson’s, went to the White House eight times between July 2023 and this past March.

Jean-Pierre declined to confirm the name of the doctor or say why he was going to the White House. She told reporters this was due to security reasons and noted that the White House medical unit treats more people than just the president. “There are thousands of military personnel who come on to this White House,” Jean-Pierre said. “Many of them get the care from the White House medical unit and so we need to be super careful.”

Jean-Pierre encouraged the public to “connect the dots.”

According to a person familiar with the matter, Cannard makes roughly monthly visits to the White House to support the White House Medical Unit. The person spoke on condition of anonymity to discuss private medical matters. Cannard made similar trips during the Obama administration, according to visitor logs, and during the Trump administration according to a person familiar with the matter.

Cannard did have one visit with Biden’s personal physician this January in the White House Residence clinic, weeks before the president’s physical in February.

Could Biden waive his rights and make his full medical records public?

At Monday’s news briefing, Jean-Pierre was asked whether Biden could choose to release his full medical records. She said the president had “shared a comprehensive medical report that is pretty detailed” and in line with what was provided by former Presidents Barack Obama and George W. Bush. Sen. John McCain, in 2008, allowed reporters to review more than 1,100 pages of his medical records when he was running for president at 71, which would have made him the oldest elected president at the time.

How home swapping became the trendy alternative to Airbnb

posted in: News | 0

Lebawit Lily Girma | (TNS) Bloomberg News

Amy Froelich and her wife, Marla, have been Airbnb, Inc. hosts since 2015. They started in Iowa City, Iowa, and continued on to Madison, Wisconsin, where they own a four-bedroom home in a lush neighborhood within walking distance of trails and shops. On weeks their house isn’t rented out, they open it up for free home swaps through HomeExchange — an online travel hack they stumbled onto three years ago that lets them leverage their place for free accommodations elsewhere.

“We were just in a home exchange outside of Glasgow, Scotland. This beautiful couple, Claire and Michael, greeted us at the door with homemade bread that she’d just pulled out of the oven,” says Amy Froelich, speaking to Bloomberg from the U.K., a day after her stay concluded. The hosts couldn’t vacate on the agreed dates, but they offered the couple up a loft area with a master bedroom and en suite bath. In exchange, they’ll get to stay at the Froelichs’ home at a future date of their choosing. “It’s much more than monetary value,” says Froelich. “We departed as lifelong friends.”

Offering your home in exchange for a stay at someone else’s place is far from a new concept, but this oft-forgotten segment of the travel industry is booming amid high inflation, the normalization of remote work and skyrocketing hotel rates. Also contributing to the trend is increased frustration with short-term rentals and the growing regulation of rental homes in major cities.

In conversations with four home exchange companies, all reported either double- or triple-digit growth in 2023, compared with the previous year, based on the number of members or home swaps made on their platforms.

Kindred, an invitation-only membership platform founded in 2022 with access to 30,000 homes in 100 cities, saw home swaps grow by 800% year-over-year in 2023. The San Francisco-based startup has raised $26 million; early investors include Andreessen Horowitz, the same firm that contributed $112 million to Airbnb’s Series B funding round in 2011. (Bloomberg LP, which owns Bloomberg Businessweek, is an investor in Andreessen Horowitz.)

The model of Kindred is similar to those of pioneers such as HomeExchange and Third Home in that users earn “credits” for hosting other members in their homes; credits can then be redeemed for stays elsewhere. Kindred’s twist is that it doesn’t charge an annual membership fee; it makes money mostly from service fees.

HomeExchange, founded in 1992, experienced a 53% jump in swaps in 2023; it has more than 170,000 members in 140 countries. In 2022, it added a premium tier to its standard $220 annual membership; for $1,000, HomeExchange Collection opens the door to 5,000 luxury homes that average $2.5 million in value. Think urban penthouses, castles and wilderness retreats.

That move challenges ThirdHome’s competitive advantage as a platform exclusively for luxury homeowners; its 17,500 vacation homes in 100 countries are worth a minimum of $500,000 and top out in excess of $50 million, including yachts. Membership costs $295, with service fees for each swap ranging from $495 to $1,395 per week. It, too, has grown: Members increased by 41% and exchanges by 16% in 2013, compared with 2022.

“We’re growing, we’re hiring people and we’ve been profitable for five years now,” says Wade Shealy, who started ThirdHome in 2010 with a portfolio that consisted of a couple of friends’ homes.

Where home swapping struggles is in reputation. Many view it as an unglamorous option for budget-strapped travelers, with risks of property damage. Insiders, however, have realized—and this has propelled the sector’s growth—that the opposite can be true when swapping members are well vetted.

A human connection

Rachel Lipson says her family of four has saved tens of thousands of dollars since she started swapping her Brooklyn, New York, home in 2022. She uses the Barcelona-based, invitation-only home exchange platform Behomm, which charges a €380 ($407) annual membership fee and focuses on the homes of creative people and design lovers.

“I found it a little overwhelming at first,” says Lipson. “How am I going to let some random person stay in my house? It was hard to trust that it was going to be OK.”

When she received an initial swap request from a Behomm member located in Marrakesh, Morocco, the day before her family was to visit Los Angeles, Lipson decided to hear it out. “We did FaceTime just so we could talk — and we felt really good about it, so we said yes,” she says. The family stayed in her home while she was at a hotel in LA. On spring break the following year, Lipson’s family stayed at that member’s house in Marrakesh.

So far, Lipson’s family has swapped homes with members in 16 destinations, including Paris; Montreal; Punta Cana, Dominican Republic; Cancun, Mexico; and Reykjavik, Iceland. When preferred dates aren’t available, Lipson looks at hotels and Airbnb. “Some of these homes, you wouldn’t find them for rent,” she says. “And it’s like staying at a friend’s place while they’re out of town. You really get to know people, and that’s an experience that I’ve never had with Airbnb or hotels. It’s really its own thing.”

An evolving lodging scene

If the economy goes down, ThirdHome sees its inventory goes up, says Shealy. “About half of our members have their vacation homes on short-term rental platforms, and if they’re not renting them out as much, they get more availability to throw it into the system.”

To raise awareness, ThirdHome is now offering a free yearlong membership to people who are buying new vacation homes at, say, Rosewood or St. Regis resorts. Developers report that the perk is helping them close additional transactions. “We get about 500 new members a month right now, just from our (commercial real estate) partnerships,” Shealy adds.

Kindred, by contrast, is more concentrated in big cities; it has enjoyed the most significant growth in Los Angeles, New York and London. “I can’t say if it’s necessarily because of Airbnb getting pushed out,” says Justine Palefsky, who co-founded the company in order to facilitate a multicity lifestyle that didn’t require taking out multiple mortgages.

Even if short-term rentals remain legal in some of these markets, Palefsky says she’s seen members gravitate to Kindred because they’ve grown tired of Airbnb and its competitors. High prices and a desire to get value from their homes “without feeding the beast of the vacation rental,” she says, is forcing consumers to seek out alternatives.

Airbnb Inc. denies that its appeal has become diluted. “With over 7.7 million listings and over 1.5 billion guest arrivals in almost every country across the globe, we believe we give travelers the option to experience local communities in many more places than any other travel site, while providing important safeguards to help protect their trip,” a spokesperson said.

Weighing the risks

As do Kindred, ThirdHome and HomeExchange, Behomm’s founder insists that care is taken to ensure that each member is vetted, from verifying identity documents to screening home photos, among other security measures.

Still, home exchanges can be trying. Finding a home swap in your chosen location can be time consuming, and availability is far from guaranteed.

“I probably spent three hours just sending requests,” says Marla Froelich of her hunt for accommodations in Scotland.

Frequent swappers say mishaps can happen — spilling wine on a designer couch or placing an electric kettle on a stove — but tend to be quickly resolved. The bigger risk in swaps is major property damage or bodily harm while a guest is looking after a home.

A number of home swapping platforms offer host protection, covering up to $100,000 in damages on Kindred to $5 million on ThirdHome. And some homeowners and rental policies include coverage for damage by third parties, as well.

Those who navigate these finer points can find home swapping an open door to nearly free stays in some of the world’s most coveted destinations.

In September, for instance, the Froelichs will head to Bali, Indonesia. A family from Australia that spent a week at their home a year ago via HomeExchange offered a swap at their family’s vacation home in Indonesia. “We told them we couldn’t make it (to Bali) for at least another year, and they were like, ‘We don’t care when you come, just tell us. Our driver will take you wherever you want, we’ll set you up with anything.’” That’s more than even most luxury hotels offer.

___

©2024 Bloomberg L.P. Visit bloomberg.com. Distributed by Tribune Content Agency, LLC.

¿Por qué hay un porcentaje mayor de nuevos casos de VIH entre Latinos?

posted in: Society | 0

Según los Centros para el Control y la Prevención de Enfermedades (CDC por sus siglas en inglés) entre 2012 y 2022, las tasas estimadas de nuevas infecciones de VIH disminuyeron un 23 por ciento. Sin embargo, las nuevas infecciones están muy concentradas en grupos raciales y étnicos como los afroamericanos, indígenas americanos y, especialmente, los latinos.

John McCarten/Consejo de NYC

Una rueda de prensa sobre la concienciación del sida en la comunidad latina en 2019.

En 2019 el Departamento de Salud y Servicios Humanos de Estados Unidos (HHS por sus siglas en inglés) inició la campaña llamada “Ending the HIV Epidemic”, para acabar con la epidemia del VIH en el país para el 2030.

Y si bien las tasas estimadas de nuevas infecciones de VIH disminuyeron un 23 por ciento entre 2012 y 2022, no todos los grupos vieron esta disminución.

Las nuevas infecciones están muy concentradas en grupos raciales y étnicos como los afroamericanos, indígenas americanos y los latinos. Según un análisis de KFF Health News y la Associated Press, la tasa no ha descendido tanto entre latinos como para otros grupos raciales y étnicos.

Si bien los ciudadanos afroamericanos siguen teniendo las tasas más altas de VIH en los Estados Unidos en general, en 2022 los latinos representaron la mayor parte de los nuevos diagnósticos e infecciones por VIH entre hombres homosexuales y bisexuales, en comparación con otros grupos raciales y étnicos.

Según el reporte de KFF Health News y la AP, el Congreso ha destinado $2.3 mil millones de dólares para la campaña, pero en 34 de las 57 áreas que reciben dinero los casos no disminuyeron.

En 2022 los latinos representaron el 36 por ciento de nuevos diagnósticos de VIH entre hombres que tuvieron relaciones sexuales con hombres, frente al 26 por ciento en 2012.

Existen herramientas de prevención y tratamiento del VIH, pero no todos los grupos raciales y étnicos se benefician por igual de estos avances, y según estimaciones del CDC, sólo al 13 por ciento de las personas afroamericanas y el 24 por ciento de los latinos que podrían beneficiarse se les ha recetado PrEP, un medicamento que ayuda a prevenir el VIH.

Así que para hablar sobre este reportaje invitamos a una de las autoras, Vanessa Sánchez, corresponsal de KFF Health News.

Más detalles en nuestra conversación a continuación.

Ciudad Sin Límites, el proyecto en español de City Limits, y El Diario de Nueva York se han unido para crear el pódcast “El Diario Sin Límites” para hablar sobre latinos y política. Para no perderse ningún episodio de nuestro pódcast “El Diario Sin Límites” síguenos en Spotify, Soundcloud, Apple Pódcast y Stitcher. Todos los episodios están allí. ¡Suscríbete!