Rubio says the US will drop Ukraine-Russia peace efforts if no progress within days

posted in: All news | 0

By ANGELA CHARLTON and HANNA ARHIROVA, Associated Press

PARIS (AP) — U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio said Friday that the U.S. may “move on” from trying to secure a Russia-Ukraine peace deal if there is no progress in the coming days, after months of efforts have failed to bring an end to the fighting.

He spoke in Paris after landmark talks among U.S., Ukrainian and European officials produced outlines for steps toward peace and appeared to make some long-awaited progress. A new meeting is expected next week in London, and Rubio suggested that could be decisive in determining whether the Trump administration continues its involvement.

“We are now reaching a point where we need to decide whether this is even possible or not,” Rubio told reporters upon departure. “Because if it’s not, then I think we’re just going to move on.”

“It’s not our war,” Rubio said. “We have other priorities to focus on.” He said the U.S. administration wants to decide “in a matter of days.”

US Secretary of State Marco Rubio looks on as he arrives at the Quai d’Orsay, France’s Minister of Foreign Affairs for high-level talks to discuss Ukraine and its security in Paris Thursday, April 17, 2025. (Julien de Rosa, Pool via AP)

US and Ukraine make progress on minerals deal

His comments came as the U.S. and Ukraine are nearing a long-delayed deal granting the U.S. access to Ukraine’s vast mineral resources, which has been intertwined with President Donald Trump’s peace push. Trump said Thursday, “We have a minerals deal,” and Ukraine’s economy minister said Friday that the two countries signed a memorandum of intent ahead of a possible fuller agreement later.

The deal, which Ukrainian Economy Minister Yuliia Svyrydenko said she signed with U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, is expected to pave the way for significant investments, infrastructure modernization and long-term cooperation.

The framework of the mineral deal had stalled in February following a contentious Oval Office meeting between Trump, U.S. Vice President JD Vance, and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy. Negotiations have since resumed.

Despite apparent growing U.S. impatience with the peace efforts, Rubio called Thursday’s Paris talks constructive. “Nobody rejected anything, nobody got up from the table or walked away.”

Rubio didn’t single out Russia or Ukraine as blocking peace efforts. He said he informed Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov about the outlines that emerged when they spoke after the Paris talks, but wouldn’t say how Lavrov reacted.

When asked about Rubio’s comments on Friday, Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov told reporters that “fairly complex” negotiations are ongoing between Russia and the U.S. He did not give details but said no direct talks between Trump and Putin are scheduled in the coming days.

“Russia is striving toward resolving this conflict, securing its own interests, and is open to dialogue. We are continuing to do this,” he said.

After weeks of tensions with European allies, Rubio told reporters in Paris that the European negotiators proved helpful. “The U.K. and France and Germany can help us move the ball on this.”

European concerns are growing about Trump’s readiness to draw closer to Russia. These talks were the first time since Trump’s inauguration that top American, Ukrainian and European officials met to discuss an end to the war, which has posed the biggest security challenge to Europe since World War II.

The meetings addressed security guarantees for Ukraine in the future, but Rubio wouldn’t discuss any possible U.S. role in that. Some kind of U.S. support for Ukraine is seen as crucial to ensuring that Russia would not attack again after a peace deal is reached.

Rubio and presidential envoy Steve Witkoff have helped lead U.S. efforts to seek peace, and Witkoff has met three times with Putin, Rubio said. Several rounds of negotiations have been held in Saudi Arabia.

Moscow has effectively refused to accept a comprehensive ceasefire that Trump has pushed and Ukraine has endorsed. Russia has made it conditional on a halt in Ukraine’s mobilization efforts and Western arms supplies, which are demands rejected by Ukraine.

Russia attacks 2 Ukrainian cities, wounding scores

Meanwhile, Russia kept up a series of deadly strikes on Ukrainian cities, according to officials there, wounding scores of civilians days after missiles killed at least 34 during Palm Sunday celebrations in the northern city of Sumy.

One person died and 98 others, including six children, were hurt as Russia hit Kharkiv, Ukraine’s second-largest city, early in the day, its mayor Ihor Terekhov reported on Friday. He said cluster munitions struck a “densely populated” neighborhood four times.

In this photo taken from video distributed by Russian Defense Ministry Press Service on Friday, April 18, 2025, the Russian BM-21 “Grad” self-propelled 122 mm multiple rocket launcher fires towards Ukrainian positions in Ukraine. (Russian Defense Ministry Press Service via AP)

Russian drones also targeted a bakery in Sumy, less than a week after the deadly Palm Sunday strike there, killing a customer and wounding an employee, the regional prosecutor’s office said. Photos released by the agency showed rows of Easter cakes stacked inside a devastated building, covered in thick dust, as a huge hole gaped in the wall behind them and rubble piled up on the floor.

Last Sunday’s strike on Sumy, resulting in mass casualties, was the second large-scale missile attack to claim civilian lives in just over a week. Some 20 people, including nine children, died on April 4 as missiles struck Zelenskyy’s hometown of Kryvyi Rih.

Arhirova reported from Kyiv, Ukraine. Illia Novikov in Kyiv and Joanna Kozlowska in London contributed to this report.

Tribunales y jueces falsos: solicitantes de asilo explican estafas para aprovecharse de inmigrantes

posted in: All news | 0

Durante una audiencia del Concejo de la ciudad, inmigrantes y defensores compartieron historias de fraude en procesos migratorios, gran parte de estos se lleva a cabo a través de las redes sociales.

Christian, quien no dio su apellido por temor a ser perseguido por el gobierno federal, relató el martes en una audiencia del Concejo de la ciudad de Nueva York cómo fue estafado realizando trámites de inmigración. (Screenshot from NY City Council hearing webcast)

Este artículo se publicó originalmente en inglés el 17 de abril. Traducido por Daniel Parra. Read the English version here.

Durante una audiencia del Concejo de la ciudad de Nueva York sobre el fraude en los servicios y procesos de inmigración, un solicitante de asilo testificó sobre cómo había sido engañado por alguien que decía ser su abogado. 

“Estaba desesperado por encontrar a alguien que me ayudara a solicitar asilo”, dijo Christian durante la audiencia conjunta de los comités de inmigración y de protección de los consumidores y los trabajadores del Concejo. (Christian, junto con otros inmigrantes que testificaron, sólo dieron su nombre de pila por temor a represalias de las agencias del gobierno federal).

La persona que se había hecho pasar por su abogado, dijo él, no sólo le cobró dinero —que es una práctica común entre las personas que estafan a inmigrantes— sino que también falsificó documentos, como notificaciones, e incluso organizó una audiencia judicial falsa a través de Google Meet.

“Recuerdo que me dijo que vistiera formalmente”, dijo Christian.

El día de la falsa audiencia virtual, dijo él, apareció un juez falso, vestido con una toga negra. Afortunadamente para Christian, no se conectó solo. Un estudiante de derecho que había estado ayudandolo con otros asuntos le acompañó durante la audiencia virtual.

Christian cuenta que, al final de la falsa audiencia, el juez le dijo en español que tendría que pagar algo más de $5.000 dólares en los próximos ocho días o, de lo contrario, el pago exigido ascendería a $25.000 dólares. El estudiante de derecho avisó de la estafa a los abogados de la Legal Aid Society, que intervinieron y la detuvieron.

Christian fue uno de los varios inmigrantes que declararon haber sido víctimas de fraude en procesos migratorios. Esto puede incluir estafas relacionadas con servicios legales por parte de quienes son y no son abogados, así como traductores o proveedores de otros servicios como los notarios en los Estados Unidos, quienes no son expertos legales y se aprovechan de las personas que asumen que quienes dirigen los servicios notariales son abogados, como ocurre en muchos países hispanohablantes. Pero ese no es el caso.

“En el último año han aumentado las denuncias de fraude en los servicios de inmigración en Nueva York, y los defensores de los inmigrantes no han dejado de dar la voz de alarma sobre estas crecientes amenazas”, dijo la concejal Alexa Avilés, presidenta del comité de Inmigración del Concejo. “A menudo, el fraude en los servicios de inmigración se vuelve más rampante en períodos en los que aumenta la demanda de servicios legales”.

Las concejales Shahana Hanif y Julie Won han presentado proyectos de ley contra el fraude para estos servicios. El proyecto de ley de Hanif, Intro 205, educaría al público sobre los esquemas fraudulentos perpetrados por los proveedores de servicios legales de inmigración. El de Won, Intro 980, aumentaría las penas para las primeras y subsiguientes violaciones. 

El Departamento de Protección al Consumidor y al Trabajador (DCWP por sus siglas en inglés), que maneja los casos de fraude civil en la ciudad, dijo que las quejas presentadas sobre los proveedores de servicios de inmigración han aumentado en los últimos tres años, con 23 quejas en 2022, 36 en 2023 y 46 en 2024.

Durante la audiencia del Concejo, la comisionada del DCWP, Vilda Vera Mayuga, dijo que el departamento ha “intensificado” las investigaciones contra las agencias de empleo y los proveedores de servicios de inmigración.

El DCWP dijo que recientemente había inspeccionado a casi 500 empresas que anunciaban servicios de inmigración o servicios relacionados, y emitió más de 60 citaciones.

“Observamos lo que está ocurriendo en estos momentos y sabemos que, desde el cambio de administración en Washington, éste es un ámbito en el que debemos centrarnos”, afirmó Mayuga. 

Desde enero, explicó el departamento, el DCWP ha recibido ocho quejas, la mayoría de ellas relacionadas con profesionales no autorizados.

El DCWP realiza inspecciones sobre el terreno en respuesta a las quejas, y las investigaciones pueden dar lugar a citaciones ante la Oficina de Juicios y Audiencias Administrativas de la ciudad. Los funcionarios del DCWP reconocen que perseguir a los proveedores de servicios de inmigración y agencias de empleo fraudulentas sigue siendo un reto constante. 

“Debido a su naturaleza clandestina, muchos operan desde escaparates temporales, residencias, aplicaciones de mensajería instantánea o plataformas en línea, para desaparecer después de recibir el pago de un consumidor”, explicó Mayuga.

Christian, por ejemplo, encontró a alguien que se hacía pasar por abogado en Facebook. Le dijo por mensajes de WhatsApp que podía ayudarle con su caso por $1.750 dólares, que él pagó.

Más tarde, recibió lo que más tarde determinó que era un aviso de recibo falso, con un sello de aspecto oficial.

El recibo falso tenía “algunos errores gramaticales en inglés”, explicó Deborah Lee, abogada encargada de la unidad de derecho de inmigración de Legal Aid Society. Además, “se habían olvidado de traducir partes al inglés”, dijo.

Sin embargo, parecía lo suficientemente oficial como para engañar a muchos solicitantes de asilo, dijo Lee, que ha estado llevando el caso desde que el estudiante de derecho lo refirió. “A primera vista, sobre todo si no eres un hablante nativo de inglés o un lector, no necesariamente serías capaz de pillarlo”, dijo.

Lee añadió que era la primera vez que veían este tipo de audiencias judiciales fabricadas, mientras que el DCWP reconoció que no habían recibido quejas que detallaran audiencias de inmigración falsas en el pasado.

“Nunca habíamos visto algo de esta magnitud”, dijo Lee.

Durante la audiencia del Concejo, los defensores señalaron que, dado que muchas de estas estafas tienen lugar en las redes sociales, son más difíciles de castigar para los funcionarios municipales, porque no hay locales físicos que inspeccionar.

Lee y otros defensores advirtieron que los estafadores también están creando lo que parecen ser sitios web fraudulentos o alternativos relacionados con agencias de inmigración. Algunos, explicó Lee, parecen un sitio de un tribunal de inmigración, mientras que otros se parecen a un rastreador de solicitudes del USCIS, “pero es sólo una web privada”.

Cuando Avilés preguntó sobre las estafas realizadas a través de las redes sociales, Mayuga respondió que el DCWP confía en que los denunciantes confirmen la información que proporcionan y ayuden a identificar a la persona que está detrás de la cuenta.

Otros funcionarios del DCWP reconocieron que las redes sociales no hacen sino exacerbar el aspecto clandestino de este problema y subrayaron la importancia de medidas preventivas como la educación. Mayuga dijo que el departamento está llevando a cabo una campaña de educación digital a través de redes sociales para educar a los neoyorquinos sobre las protecciones relacionadas con los proveedores de servicios de inmigración. En los últimos tres años, el DCWP ha coordinado un día de acción en toda la ciudad y ha celebrado 600 actos de divulgación centrados en inmigrantes.

Tanto los defensores como los funcionarios municipales reconocieron la reticencia de las comunidades inmigrantes a presentar denuncias por miedo a la interacción con el gobierno, pero recordaron a la gente que terceras personas, como familiares, amigos o personas de organizaciones comunitarias, pueden presentarlas, incluso de forma anónima. Las quejas pueden presentarse llamando al 311, en la dirección nyc.gov/Consumers o en la Oficina de la Fiscal General de Nueva York, en la dirección ag.ny.gov/file-complaint o llamando al 1-800-771-7755. (Un portavoz de la oficina del fiscal general explicó que pueden emprender acciones civiles contra particulares o empresas que cometan fraudes a gran escala contra las comunidades inmigrantes).

El jefe de gabinete de Won, Nick Gulotta, testificando a título personal como alguien que ha trabajado en este asunto por años, recomendó hacer una “lista de los peores” para este asunto, o la creación de una base de datos sobre fraudes.

“Es una gran idea”, animó Avilés. “Me gustaría llamarla ‘lista de la vergüenza’”.

Para ponerse en contacto con el reportero de esta noticia, escriba a Daniel@citylimits.org. Para ponerse en contacto con la editora, escriba a Jeanmarie@citylimits.org.

The post Tribunales y jueces falsos: solicitantes de asilo explican estafas para aprovecharse de inmigrantes appeared first on City Limits.

What Happened This Week in NYC Housing?

posted in: All news | 0

Each Friday, City Limits rounds up the latest news on housing, land use and homelessness. Catch up on what you might have missed here.

Andrew Cuomo giving his speech resigning as governor in August 2021.

Welcome to “What Happened in NYC Housing This Week?” where we compile the latest local news about housing, land use and homelessness. Know of a story we should include in next week’s roundup? Email us.

ICYMI, from City Limits:

“We’ve already received reports of denials [of housing applications] based on conviction records, highlighting the urgent need for proactive education that a properly funded CCHR could provide. Without sufficient resources, the CCHR’s inability to effectively educate and enforce the FCHA will have dire consequences.” Read the oped here.

“It’s clear we need to prove to New Yorkers that new housing in their neighborhoods will strengthen communities. We can do so by passing the Faith-Based Affordable Housing Act. Under this bill, churches, synagogues, mosques and other faith-based institutions would be able to override local zoning rules to construct affordable housing on their underused land.” Read the oped here.

“Supportive housing offers on-site services like psychiatric care, medication management and case management — services that are essential for keeping residents housed long-term. SROs are a cost-effective, scalable model that could provide immediate relief for those who desperately need a stable place to live.” Read the oped here.

ICYMI, from other local newsrooms:

Mayoral candidate Andrew Cuomo’s housing plan released on Saturday is “fairly unremarkable” except for the garbled part about appointing “Rent Guidelines Board members who will make decisions bbjectively” (sic) that appears to have been written with the help of ChatGPT, Hell Gate reports. (Cuomo’s staff blames faulty voice recognition software.)

Even after 64 New York City Housing Authority employees were arrested on charges of taking cash bribes from vendors for public housing repairs, companies that participated in the bribery conspiracy are continuing to rake in millions of dollars of NYCHA contracts, The City reports.

Fines for landlord-hired real estate brokers who charge tenants fees in violation of the city’s new ban set to go into effect in June would be far less than brokers stand to make on the fees themselves, which makes for “not much of a deterrent,” Curbed reports.

The Trump administration is considering slashing Section 8 and other federal housing vouchers — which currently aid 2.3 million low-income families, and are only a fraction of what’s needed — and replacing them with “a more limited system of housing grants,” The New York Times reports.

The post What Happened This Week in NYC Housing? appeared first on City Limits.

Other voices: The federal financial cop is off the beat

posted in: All news | 0

When the financial markets go wild, investors naturally want to know, “What’s next?” Unfortunately, one answer turns out to be true every time: Brace yourself for a big upswing in financial fraud.

Market volatility and economic uncertainty combine to make everyone more vulnerable to fraud, from expert traders to regular folks who rarely think about their portfolios except when fear is on the rise.

At the same time, investment scams have become more sophisticated. Artificial intelligence and other cutting-edge technology make them harder to spot and easier to implement on a large scale. The stakes are higher than ever.

The Federal Trade Commission last month announced that Americans reported $5.7 billion in losses from investment fraud in 2024, up 24% from the prior year. The increase was driven not from an uptick in the number of fraud cases, but rather from crime paying off at a higher rate. Last year, 38% of those reporting fraud said they had been cheated out of their money, up from 27% in 2023 who said the scams they’d experienced had cost them.

This year could be a lot worse than 2024, not least because Uncle Sam is letting down its guard. From Day One of his second term, President Donald Trump has targeted federal watchdogs responsible for protecting consumers.

Through Elon Musk’s Department of Government Efficiency, the Trump administration has set out to dismantle the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau. While this page supports the goal of cutting red tape and saving tax dollars, every American should be aware that the CFPB, now sidelined, has recovered over $20 billion in financial relief for U.S. consumers since Congress launched it after the 2008 market crash.

DOGE operatives also have pushed for mass firings at the Internal Revenue Service, an agency with a strong consumer-protection mandate that provides a huge return on every dollar the government invests in running it. Slashing its workforce, as the Trump administration has set out to do, makes zero budget sense and encourages criminal behavior.

Similarly, the administration has redirected federal law-enforcement agencies away from prosecuting financial predators to focus on its immigration crackdown and other Trump priorities. The Justice Department recently disclosed that it has disbanded its cryptocurrency fraud unit, for instance, even though scams using crypto as a payment method are on the rise.

Earlier this month, as his tariff fiasco roiled financial markets, President Donald Trump declared, “This is a great time to get rich, richer than ever before.” It would be true to form if criminals were among those most eagerly taking Trump at his word.

A recent scam in Wisconsin began when dozens of unsuspecting households were told their bank accounts had been hacked.

Posing as federal agents, the scamsters goaded one older office worker into emptying her accounts of more than $400,000, using the funds to buy gold bars, then handing over the precious metal to a “courier” for supposed safekeeping. The victim alertly wrote down the license plate of the alleged courier, who was swiftly arrested, and has since been ordered to pay restitution.

If anyone reaches out unexpectedly, claiming to be a person in authority, saying you must quickly hand over money, don’t do it. Refuse to provide financial information in response to an unexpected request. Resist the pressure to turn over funds on the spot via wire transfers, payment apps, gift cards, cryptocurrency or, of course, gold bars.

Perhaps more than ever in its modern history, America is headed toward a government that won’t do much more to help consumers beyond the traditional warning of “Buyer Beware.” So take that warning to heart, and especially in these uncertain times, be on guard for criminals who want to separate you from your hard-earned savings.

— The Chicago Tribune

Related Articles


Marshall man claims that ICE detained him for protests over police killings


Other voices: RFK Jr. needs to explain himself


U.S. Renews Opposition to Bringing Back Maryland Man Wrongly Deported to El Salvador


Suspect Arrested in Arson at Pennsylvania Governor’s Mansion, Officials Say


A green jacket for Rory McIlroy: Irishman finishes career grand slam