Letters: Tell us more about the protest at Cities Church

posted in: All news | 0

Tell us more

The cherished First Amendment right of individuals to worship freely without government interference collided with the cherished First Amendment right to peacefully assemble at Cities Church in St. Paul on Sunday, Jan. 18.

Cities Church attenders, freely exercising their civil right to worship and honoring God by gathering together, found themselves surrounded in their worship center by others who believe they were exercising their right to peaceably assemble.

Who is right? Did Cities Church attenders trample on the rights of the disruptors, or did the disruptors overstep their rights?

The disruptors’ cause seemed to gather the most media attention; their right to peacefully assemble (is chanting, shouting and vile language in a church “peaceable?”). This, despite the anti-ICE protestors complaining about ICE terrorizing children (which has happened) as the uninvited guests at Cities Church were terrorizing the children attending the worship service.

Now, two journalists, Georgia Fort and Don Lemon, have been indicted by a jury of their peers for their role in the disruption. Their reporting memorialized their behavior for all of us to see. I think it is reasonable to ask how they knew this event would happen. How did they come to be with the demonstrators? Was this a news tip from the demonstrators’ leaders? And if so, why only Fort and Lemon?

Did either journalist fuel the disruptors’ passions in how they reported the story, or did they report the facts as they happened? If their live reporting energized the disruptors, we would like to know.

It is critically important that no government agency, including the courts, use its power to intimidate reporters from objectively reporting. A free press fails when it disciplines reporters in advance for what they may or may not say.

I saw the disruption of the right to Freedom to Worship as an attack on that foundational right, and dangerous. This is why we need objective, ongoing reporting in this instant case. Tell us how the disruptors came together, their motives, the background of the leader(s), the mission of the church, and accurate information about the individuals whose livelihoods depend on serving the public as ICE officials.

There is much to unpack here. Do it for us. I look forward to your report.

Dave Racer, Woodbury

 

I want to know

Normally, I hate spoilers.  This time, I want to know how the story ends.

I want to know whether all the people whose only mistake was coming to the U.S. and assuming we’d treat them fairly will be released. I want to know whether we’re going to keep imprisoning children. I want to know whether everyone will be able to talk to their lawyers and families.

I want to know whether all the people involved in these horrors will face justice, from the people who committed two-thirds of murders in Minneapolis this year to the man arrested for a DUI to the leadership who approves and excuses their actions to everyone who’s been violating so much of the Bill of Rights that you start to wonder whether the Constitution matters any more.

I want to know whether ICE and DHS will be taken apart, since the bad apples have spoiled the barrel from top to bottom.

I want to know whether the rest of the country is going to forget that what’s happening here isn’t supposed to be normal. I want to know whether this will be over before the midterm elections and what happens if it’s not.

I want to know whether all our neighbors will be able to go about their lives without fearing being snatched off the street by masked thugs. I want to know how long everyone supporting our community will have to keep going.

I want to know when this will all be over. I want to know whether it will ever be over, or if we’ve gone too far down the road to an authoritarian police state to turn back.

I want to know whether anyone else is going to die.

But I don’t know.

I can’t control the news or the people who are unloading their hatred on the Twin Cities and Minnesota. All I can do is complain to my elected officials and help my neighbors where I can. So, I’m going to do that.  And maybe that will make the ending a little better.

Rachel Reddick, St. Paul

 

In the nature of double jeopardy

I have learned of the detention of former Hmong and Vietnamese refugees by ICE at Freeborn County Detention Center with the intention of deporting them to Southeast Asia when acceptance of the governments of Laos and Vietnam can be obtained. The reason for the detention of these persons is that they were arrested and completed criminal penalties for offenses a considerable time in the past. These offenses occurred more than 10 years ago in the cases I learned about. To arrest and process them again, now by de-naturalizing the men and deporting them, has the nature of double jeopardy.

These men have rehabilitated their lives. They have established families and are raising children. Some have grandchildren. This plan of deporting them is a great injustice to both them and their families. We who know the importance of fathers in a family can recognize the generational impact these unreasonably punitive and vengeful actions will have. I call upon Minnesota state and federal elected officials to negotiate their release.

Richard W. Podvin, Roseville

 

Take a breath, everybody

I would like to ask that all people in the Twin Cities and Minnesota, including ICE agents, stop, take a breath and look deep inside ourselves for the kindness and grace that is there to extend to each other.

If ICE agents could see that they have some compassion for the people they are arresting, the arrest would go so much easier. And perhaps they would realize when an arrest is really needed.

If those of us watching can realize that agents are under a lot of pressure and may be triggered by things that are not comfortable for them, we could stand farther away and chant nonviolent words. While what ICE is doing is not comfortable for most of the rest of us, we can take care to resist and protest nonviolently as trained. Violence begets violence — let’s stay away from violence, whether physical or verbal. Let’s recognize compassion.

This is an ugly and un-American time in our city and country, but we all, including ICE agents, have the capability of composing ourselves to be the best people that we can be in a very difficult time.

Julie Borgerding July, St. Paul

 

The America we can take pride in is still alive

Some of Minnesota’s finest took to frozen streets in sub-zero temperatures and wicked windchills to stand up for human decency, to stand up for those without a voice and against the injustice of lives senselessly lost. They protested inhumane and lawless actions of armed government forces, faces hidden, the cruelty altogether un-American at its core. Despite video evidence to the contrary, the administration’s spokespersons looked us right in the eye and lied. They actually thought we’d accept whatever they said without question. Not here, not this time.

.Minnesota showed this administration they picked the wrong state to invade.Donald Trump could see Operation Metro Surge was a failure that even he couldn’t spin as a success. Changes had to be made.

Could Congress take a lesson from Minnesota? Probably too much to ask but it is possible to challenge Trump’s regime and survive his wrath. Minnesotans gave the entire country hope. It showed the America we can take pride in is still alive. We should be extremely proud of our state, peaceful protesters and their supporters.

Thomas L. Lenczowski, Mendota Heights

 

Bravo for your courage and ability to stay peaceful

Dear St. Paul, I could not be more proud of how you have handled the ongoing turmoil caused by the ICE agents who descended upon your city. Despite the bitter cold and snow there, you were (and still are) marching, protesting, lighting candles, looking out for your neighbors and crossing the Mighty Mississippi to lend support to your Twin City, Minneapolis.

Bravo for your courage and for your ability to stay peaceful! I am sending you warm and peaceful winds from Los Angeles to Saint Paul, now and always.

Robi Inserra, Los Angeles. The writer was born and raised in St. Paul

‘Help’

So let’s see if I have this right: Donald Trump has now decided that he will not “help” “Democratic cities unless we basically beg for it. Well we here in Minnesota are thrilled with that news because we didn’t ask for your help to begin with. Now maybe you can pull all of your poorly trained agents out of our state before they kill more innocent people.

Trump also wants to “guard, and very powerfully so” all federal buildings. Let’s hope he does a better job of that than he did on January 6, 2021.

Cathy Ferrazzo, Mahtomedi

 

They were winning on fraud, and then came ICE

Thousands of us who are centrists, humanists and moderates should say “thank you” to Republicans. Why? With the outrage about the military invasion of Minneapolis, Republicans have handed us victory in the mid-terms. They were out ahead, investigating the huge fraud in Minnesota. Suddenly, their leader decided to stop that and escalate pressure against the people and the government of the State of Minnesota for personal reasons of revenge. Let us all help keep our invasion front and center in the eyes and hearts of our nation and let us focus on saving our sinking ship of democracy.

Nancy Lanthier Carroll, Roseville

 

American enough

People who believe the priority function of government is to enforce obedience are fundamentally un-American. They simultaneously assert a right to decide who is American enough.

M.Warner, Minneapolis

 

It depends, apparently

Gun-rights and Second Amendment advocates have consistently said that American citizens require the unequivocal right to bear arms to protect themselves from the tyrannical overreach of an overzealous federal government. By that logic, when Alex Pretti, a law-abiding gun owner, was pepper-sprayed and beaten on the ground by masked federal ICE and Border Patrol agents in his own community for coming to the aid of a woman being assaulted by such agents, he could have drawn his weapon and legally shot all six of his assailants in self-defense. Instead, the agents disarmed him of his gun then pumped 10 bullets into his body claiming he posed a threat for just having a gun.

Republican Cabinet-level officials immediately insisted that Alex Pretti was a domestic terrorist “brandishing” his weapon with the intent of assassinating as many federal agents as he could, and the President of the United States is still saying he shouldn’t have even had a gun, implying that is what got him killed!. Of course, clear video footage shows him only brandishing a cell phone and helping a woman in distress; asking if she was OK. I certainly don’t remember such rhetoric from Republicans when Kyle Rittenhouse stalked the streets of Kenosha, Wisconsin, actually “brandishing” his assault rifle and eventually killing two people. In fact, he was a labeled a gun-rights hero and acquitted of murder. And on January 6th our cowardly President said he didn’t care if his supporters who stormed the Capitol and assaulted Capitol police carried guns because they weren’t going to shoot him.

So, let’s get this straight; do Americans have the right to bear arms or not? The answer is, it depends. Apparently even carrying a gun while liberal can get you labeled as a domestic terrorist. And if you’re a legal firearm owner and don’t brandish or fire your gun, you still can’t even have a gun and you can be shot if you’re a liberal protester coming to the aid of a woman whose been shoved to the ground by federal agents. But you can “brandish” a semi-automatic assault rifle if you’re a conservative Republican at a protest, or you’re storming the Capitol but don’t intend to kill the President; everyone else is fair game. The hypocrisy has been astounding. Which way is it going to be folks, can’t have it both ways.

Greg Kvaal, Mendota Heights

Related Articles


Camp Bar to host benefit show to cover lost wages after canceling controversial comic


St. Paul to state leaders: Freeze evictions, utility shut-offs


During immigration enforcement surge, St. Paul Council introduces ordinance barring officer face coverings


Interstate 94 east of downtown St. Paul to close for the weekend — for real this time


Here’s how to support small businesses in Twin Cities impacted by ICE surge

One-pot recipe brings together pork chops, apples and warm cabbage slaw

posted in: All news | 0

Protein-rich, savory dishes like pan-sauteed pork chops are classic cold-weather food because they don’t just fill your belly with something incredibly satisfying — they also fill your kitchen with wonderful, comforting aromas.

They’re especially flavorful when topped with apples and shallots simmered in butter and perfumed with fresh sage.

This recipe comes together in a flash — less than 20 minutes — making it a perfect dish for busy school nights or after a long day in front of the computer.

For a complete meal, the chops are served with another winter classic, a warm green cabbage slaw.

For the juiciest chops, allow them to come up to room temperature for around 20 minutes after seasoning with salt and pepper. Also be sure to cook them to a proper internal temperature of 145 degrees.

To shred cabbage by hand (mandolins are super scary!), cut the head in half from top to bottom and remove the core. Place the cabbage cut-side down on the cutting board and make a series of parallel vertical cuts; spacing depends on how finely sliced you want the slaw. Repeat with other half head.

I cooked the apples with the (well-washed) skin on, but you can peel them for a smoother texture.

One-pot Pork Chops with Apples and Slaw

INGREDIENTS

For slaw:

1 small head green cabbage, sliced thin or shredded

1 tablespoon butter or extra virgin olive oil

Kosher salt and freshly ground black pepper

1 teaspoon celery seed

For pork chops:

4 3-ounce pork center cut pork chops

Salt and pepper

3 tablespoons butter, divided

1 tablespoon fresh chopped sage

Kosher salt and freshly ground black pepper

2 Granny Smith or other tart apple, cored and sliced into wedges

1 small shallot, minced (about 2 tablespoons)

1 cup chicken broth or stock

1 tablespoon cornstarch or flour

2 teaspoons Dijon mustard

DIRECTIONS

Prepare slaw. Heat butter or oil in a large nonstick skillet over medium heat.

Add cabbage and toss with tongs to coat. Cook for 3-4 minutes, or until cabbage starts to slightly wilt.

Reduce heat to medium, add 1 tablespoon water, cover with lid and cook for 1 minute.

Uncover skillet and add celery seed. Continue to toss and cook for another 2-3 minutes, or until cabbage is softened and slightly translucent.

Season to taste with salt and pepper, cover and set aside while you prepare pork chops.

Pat pork chops dry with paper towels and season well with salt and pepper.

Add 1 tablespoon butter to a large nonstick or cast-iron skillet over medium-high heat. When sizzling, add chops and chopped sage and cook for 2 minutes per side, or until lightly browned with a nice sear.

Remove chops to a plate and set aside while you cook apples.

Add remaining 2 tablespoons butter to the pan and add the apples. Cook over medium heat, stirring occasionally, for 3-4 minutes, or until the apples are lightly browned.

Add chopped shallot and cook until soft and aromatic, about 2 minutes.

In a medium bowl, whisk together broth, cornstarch and mustard in a medium bowl. Pour into skillet with the apples and bring to a simmer.

Return chops to skillet, reduce heat to medium-low and cook for 3 minutes. Turn chops and cook until sauce is slightly thickened and chops register 145 degrees on an instant-read thermometer.

Transfer chops to a platter or divide among 4 plates. Top with apples and sauce, and serve with warm cabbage slaw.

Serves 4.

— adapted from “Eat What You Love Quick & Easy” by Marlene Koch

Related Articles


Weeknight dishes: A quick stew with slow weekend vibes


Dining Diary: Inexpensive eats, and a pop-up that could become a permanent restaurant


Ravioli filled with red beets is the colorful pasta dish of Olympic host Cortina


Is it chili? Is it mac and cheese? This slow cooker recipe combines the best of both


Fare For All, an affordable pop-up grocery store, ending service to metro

No public sign of a response to Savannah Guthrie’s message to her mother’s kidnapper

posted in: All news | 0

By SEJAL GOVINDARAO and JACQUES BILLEAUD, Associated Press

TUCSON, Ariz. — There was no public sign early Thursday of a response to NBC “Today” show host Savannah Guthrie’s message to her 84-year-old mother’s kidnapper.

This image provided by the Pima County Sheriff’s Department, on Monday, Feb. 2, 2026, shows a missing person alert for Nancy Guthrie. (Pima County Sheriff’s Department via AP)

In a recorded video posted on social media Wednesday, Guthrie said her family is ready to talk but wants proof that Nancy Guthrie, who authorities believe was taken from her home in Arizona against her will, is still alive. Guthrie said her family has heard media reports about a ransom letter.

“We are ready to talk. However, we live in a world where voices and images are easily manipulated,” Savannah Guthrie said while reading from a prepared statement. “We need to know without a doubt that she is alive and that you have her. We want to hear from you and we are ready to listen. Please reach out to us.”

She was last seen around 9:45 p.m. Saturday, when she was dropped off at home by family after having dinner with them, the sheriff’s department said. She was reported missing midday Sunday after she didn’t appear at a church.

Law enforcement officers are present outside the home of Nancy Guthrie, the mother of “Today” host Savannah Guthrie, near Tucson, Ariz., Monday, Feb. 2, 2026. (AP Photo/Sejal Govindarao)

The family posted the message after police conducted a search in and around Nancy Guthrie’s home for several hours Wednesday.

Kevin Adger, a spokesperson for the Pima County Sheriff’s Department, said investigators had been at the home earlier in the week for a couple of days and then turned it back over to the family with the understanding they could go back if they needed to.

“This is a follow-up investigation,” he said in reference to officials returning Wednesday.

Adger said the sheriff’s department was not commenting on the video released by the family.

Multiple media organizations reported receiving purported ransom notes Tuesday that they handed over to investigators. The sheriff’s department had said it was taking the notes and other tips seriously but declined to comment further.

The family’s message for Nancy Guthrie

Savannah Guthrie was at times emotional during the recording, with her voice cracking. She smiled and looked into the camera when addressing her mother directly, saying that the family was praying for her and that people were looking for her.

Related Articles


Today in History: February 5, White separatist convicted of murdering civil rights leader 31 years later


Musk vows to put data centers in space and run them on solar power but experts have their doubts


After 80 years, Minute Maid’s frozen canned juices are getting put on ice


LaMonte McLemore, singer and founding member of the 5th Dimension, dies at 90


‘Horrendous error’: Florida couple sues fertility clinic because baby isn’t genetically theirs

“Mommy, if you are hearing this, you are a strong woman. You are God’s precious daughter,” she said.

Savannah Guthrie described her mother as a “kind, faithful, loyal, fiercely loving woman of goodness and light” and said she was funny, spunky and clever.

“Talk to her and you’ll see,” she said.

Guthrie was flanked by her sister Annie and her brother Camron who both also spoke. Annie called their mother their beacon and said they need her.

“Mamma, If you’re listening, we need you to come home. We miss you,” Annie Guthrie said.

No suspect identified

Authorities on Wednesday offered no detailed update on their search and their next news conference was scheduled for Thursday. Pima County Sheriff Chris Nanos’ office said detectives still were speaking with anyone who had contact with Nancy Guthrie last weekend but that no suspect or person of interest had been identified.

Nanos suggested there was video from some cameras, though he didn’t elaborate, adding: “That’s all been submitted and we’re doing our best with the companies that own those cameras or built those cameras.”

There were signs of forced entry at the home in the Catalina Foothills neighborhood. Guthrie has limited mobility, and officials do not believe she left on her own. A sheriff’s dispatcher talking to deputies during a search Sunday indicated that she has high blood pressure, a pacemaker and heart issues, according to audio from broadcastify.com.

Jim Mason, longtime commander of a search-and-rescue posse in Maricopa County, isn’t involved in the search for Guthrie but said desert terrain can make looking for missing people difficult. He said it can be hard to peer into areas that are dense with mesquite trees, cholla cactus and other desert brush.

“Some of it is so thick you can’t drive through it,” Mason said.

Supporters around the country

A couple hundred people attended an evening vigil for Nancy Guthrie at a Tucson church where they heard prayers and placed lit candles on an altar. A priest prayed for God to comfort Guthrie and to bring her home to those she loves.

Afterward, Jeremy Thacker had tears in his eyes as he described the heartbreak and helplessness he was experiencing over Guthrie’s disappearance. He worked with Savannah Guthrie at a local news station and they shared losing their fathers at a young age. His own sister was kidnapped when he was young.

Thacker said he knew Nancy Guthrie to be sharp, grounded and earnest.

“We’re all holding our breath,” Thacker said.

For a fourth day Thursday, “Today” opened with Guthrie’s disappearance, playing the family’s video message in its entirety, but Savannah Guthrie was not at the anchor’s desk. NBC Sports said Tuesday that she will not be covering the 2026 Milan Cortina Winter Olympics “as she focuses on being with her family during this difficult time.”

The “Today” host grew up in Tucson, graduated from the University of Arizona and previously worked as a reporter and anchor at Tucson television station KVOA. Her parents settled in Tucson in the 1970s when she was a young child. The youngest of three siblings, she credits her mom with holding their family together after her father died of a heart attack at 49, when Savannah was just 16.

Billeaud reported from Phoenix. Associated Press writers Audrey McAvoy in Honolulu, Hallie Golden in Seattle, Michael Hill in Albany, New York, Darlene Superville in Washington and Julie Walker in New York contributed.

NYC Cracks Down on Employment Agency Violations Following City Limits’ Investigation

posted in: All news | 0

Thousands of local job hunters in recent years—in particular, those with low incomes who are not native English speakers—have paid illegal upfront fees to employment agencies, or received only partial refunds for what they paid despite not landing work, according to the city.

People waiting inside Eleny’s Employment Agency in Midtown Manhattan on a recent weekday. The firm is one of three the city’s Department of Consumer and Worker Protection looked into recently as part of a compliance review. (Adi Talwar/City Limits)

It’s common for some unemployed New Yorkers to look for work through an employment agency.

But thousands of local job hunters in the last four years—in particular, those with low incomes who are not native English speakers—have paid illegal upfront fees to these agencies, or received only partial refunds for what they paid despite not landing work, according to the city. 

In 2023, as tens of thousands of immigrants and asylum seekers arrived in New York City, City Limits reported on those who’d turned to employment agencies for assistance—and paid fees for jobs that never materialized. “This is the perfect storm for unscrupulous employers and unscrupulous employment agencies,” Hildalyn Colon-Hernandez, deputy director at New Immigrant Community Empowerment, said at the time.

Following City Limits’ reporting, the city’s Department of Consumer and Worker Protection (DCWP), which regulates and licenses employment agencies, undertook a compliance review, examining the practices of companies that had received the most complaints. 

“We sent a broader sort of request for documents to a number of employment agencies,” DCWP’s Deputy General Counsel Melissa Iachan said. “What we found in our review was that it appears that many of the employment agencies are engaging in lots of similar unlawful conduct, and it is going uncomplained about, largely because their deception is such that they even deprive consumers of knowing that they have certain rights.”

As a result, DCWP has litigated against three companies—including two that City Limits reported on in 2023—with the Office of Administrative Trials and Hearings (OATH), an independent administrative law court that resolves disputes and violations. So far, it’s resulted in the issuance of millions of dollars in civil penalties as well as restitution to compensate affected job seekers, officials said.

“With the sort of boom-boom-boom!—1-2-3—filing three cases in less than a year, we are hoping to put the industry on notice,” Iachan said. 

According to the state’s Employment Agency Law, which the city enforces, companies shouldn’t require a deposit or advance fee from applicants looking for work. If this does occur, and the applicant is ultimately not placed in a job, they can demand a refund within seven days. DCWP also requires employment agencies to provide receipts that include this information in bold, so job seekers are aware of their rights.

The three companies DCWP investigated violated this rule, officials said. They include Golden Rose, an employment firm based in Crown Heights, Brooklyn, which officials say charged people advanced fees or deposits ranging from $50 to $150 and did not always refund them when required. 

Golden Rose—which DCWP said worked with 2,553 customers in a one-year period—went before OATH in October 2025. In December, DCWP sent its post-trial briefing, and has requested civil penalties totaling $883,200 and $426,324 in restitution to compensate affected people. 

A DCWP inspector documents the required postings at Eleny’s Employment Agency in Midtown Manhattan during an inspection last month. (Adi Talwar/City Limits)

Golden Rose requested the opportunity to respond to DCWP’s briefing, and is expected to do so in the coming weeks. A lawyer representing the company declined to comment, citing the ongoing proceedings. 

In Midtown Manhattan, another firm, Eleny’s Employment Agency—which, according to DCWP’s civil action petition at OATH, is “the employment agency against whom the Department has received the most complaints in the last five years”—is accused of charging illegal fees ranging from $100 to $200 per applicant, using misleading documents, and failing to provide people with the information they’re entitled to under city rules.

A lawyer representing owner Eleny Asevedo disputed the alleged violations. “Her job placement rate is extremely high, and everyone who doesn’t get placed receives a full refund,” attorney Rebecca Szewczuk said in a statement. “She keeps perfect records, cooperates with inspection after inspection, and works hard to comply with the constantly changing laws of New York City, even when the City’s government can’t be bothered to notify her of the new rules.” 

“Eleny operates her business alone, and she has helped so many to find work,” Szewczuk said, adding that the owner is “saddened that the City is trying to put her, and others like her, out of business for a quick buck.” 

DCWP says the third agency it took before OATH, called CMP, also collected fees in advance and didn’t return them upon demand—which is against the law—and failed to include the required information on receipts given to customers, so people didn’t know they could get their money back.

Officials sought civil penalties of $2,266,500, and $979,610 in restitution—based on DCWP estimates for the number of CMP customers affected from 2022 to 2024, calculated as 6,818 people. In September, OATH sided with DCWP.

“We won,” Iachan said. “We 100 percent were successful, and we were awarded $2 million.”

The lawyer who represented CMP at OATH did not respond to a request for comment. However, the agency—which had two locations, one in Astoria and the other in Kingsbridge Heights—gave up its license and stopped operating in 2024, claiming financial hardship, making collection very challenging for both the city and affected consumers.

Iachan, along with Lindsay DeCicco, DCWP’s counsel who represented the department at OATH, explained that the city has a process to collect those funds: DCWP tries first, then it goes to the New York City Law Department, which contracts with external law firms to collect on money owed to the city.

But “given what we know about that company and the fact that they’ve not been operating, it’s probably not super likely we’re gonna see money at all,” Iachan conceded, disappointed.

A DCWP inspector reviewing Eleny’s Employment Agency’s paperwork during a recent inspection. (Adi Talwar/City Limits)

“While not every case results in direct restitution, DCWP seeks to obtain restitution for every complainant, both through individual mediation and through larger-scale enforcement actions, which are an important part of protecting workers and holding employment agencies accountable,” a spokesperson for the agency said in a statement.

In addition, DCWP started sending notice letters to all employment agencies in the city this week as part of a compliance campaign before companies apply to renew their licenses. 

“Before submitting renewal materials, agencies should review their practices and records to ensure full compliance with all applicable requirements,” notes a version of the letter reviewed by City Limits.

To reach the reporter behind this story, contact Daniel@citylimits.org. To reach the editor, contact Jeanmarie@citylimits.org

Want to republish this story? Find City Limits’ reprint policy here.

The post NYC Cracks Down on Employment Agency Violations Following City Limits’ Investigation appeared first on City Limits.