Minnesota United vs. Houston Dynamo: Keys to the match, projected starting XI and a prediction

posted in: News | 0

Minnesota United vs. Houston Dynamo

When: 7:30 p.m. Saturday

Where: Allianz Field

Stream: Apple TV Season Pass

Radio: KSTP-AM 1500 ESPN

Weather: 77 degrees, partly cloudy, 12 mph north wind

Betting line: MNUFC plus-110; draw plus-230; Houston plus-235

Series history: The Loons are unbeaten in their past nine matches against Houston and are 9-4-4 against the Dynamo since joining MLS in 2017.

Form: MNUFC (3-1-2, 11 points) bounced back from its first loss of the season to draw 1-1 with Real Salt Lake last Saturday. Houston (3-2-1, 10 points) had a three-game winning streak snapped with a 2-1 loss to Chicago Fire last Saturday. Houston is 0-3-1 away from home; Loons are unbeaten (1-0-2) in three matches at home.

Absences: Emanuel Reynoso is out after missing U.S. green card meeting and remaining in Argentina. Joseph Rosales is suspended after receiving two yellow cards vs. RSL. Micky Tapias (hamstring) and Zarek Valentin (thigh) are sidelined. But Kervin Arriaga (knee) and Hassani Dotson (hamstring) are available to play.

Key question: With Tapias and Rosales out, head coach Eric Ramsay will need to make decisions on who plays on the left side of the Loons’ back line. Does he start rookie Hugo Bacharach and give the Spaniard his MLS debut? Or does Ramsay give Victor Eriksson another shot after a shaky MLS debut off the bench in a 2-0 loss to Philadelphia on March 30?

Projected XI: In a 4-3-3 formation, LW Bongi Hlongawne, CF Teemu Pukki, RW Sang Bin Jeong; CM Alejandro Bran, CM Robin Lod, CM Wil Trapp; LB Devin Padelford, CB Hugo Bacharach, CB Michael Boxall, RB DJ Taylor; GK Dayne St. Clair.

Quote: Ramsay addressed what he sets out to do with inexperienced players thrust into bigger roles. “You’ve got to find that fine balance between them feeling like they have had that coaching, but they are also free enough to do what they have done that has got them to this point in their career and they can go and execute it,” Ramsay said. “And they don’t feel that they’ve got someone sort of puppeteering them from the side.”

Key stats: Houston is tied for third in MLS with only six goals allowed through seven games. When asked about their defense, Ramsay pointed to Houston’s possession numbers — a league-high 61 percent — as a key reason for lack of goals conceded. MNUFC, meanwhile, has allowed only seven goals this season.

Player to watch: Forward Aliyu Ibrahim has a team-high three goals and one assist in 529 minutes this season, which matches the Nigerian’s goal total across 1,205 minutes a year ago. The 22-year-old arrived in 2023 from Lokomotiva in Croatia.

Check-in: Former MNUFC academy coach Peter McDonnell led Philadelphia Union’s Under-17 team to win the highly competitive Generation Adidas Cup title on Sunday. MNUFC’s U17 side was bounced out of the GA Cup in an earlier round.

Prediction: With both MLS clubs allowing a scarce amount of goals this season, here’s a sneaking suspicion we get the dreaded 0-0 draw.

Related Articles

Minnesota United FC |


What will Loons do with talented but flighty star player Emanuel Reynoso?

Minnesota United FC |


Loons have holes on left side of defense. Who will fill them versus Houston?

Minnesota United FC |


Minnesota United finds late equalizer in a 1-1 draw with Real Salt Lake

Minnesota United FC |


Charley Walters: Time is now for Vikings to get a franchise quarterback

Minnesota United FC |


Minnesota United vs. Real Salt Lake: Keys to the match, projected starting XI and a prediction

What ever happened to Twin Cities’ ‘Fishing Hat’ bank robber and his victims? Filmmaker takes deep look.

posted in: News | 0

When Mark Brown wrote to a prolific Twin Cities bank robber locked up in a federal prison in Minnesota, he wasn’t surprised to hear back.

The documentary filmmaker thought: “If I were in prison and really bored and I got a letter from someone who was interested in my story, I’d probably write back.”

Brown wanted to make a short film about John Whitrock but he didn’t imagine that it would become his first full-length documentary, unfolding over nearly a decade, and the twists and turns he’d encounter along the way.

“The Fishing Hat Bandit” premieres at the Minneapolis St. Paul International Film Festival on Friday, April 19.

It’s not just a true crime documentary, but a story about the power of restorative justice and taking a different approach to forgiveness, Brown says. He arranged a meeting with Whitrock and one of the bank tellers he’d robbed, who remained traumatized 20 years later.

“I think a lot of times, in the current environment, these films are whodunits,” Brown said. “But I wanted to figure out what John’s motivations were and figure out how it affected the people that were victims of these crimes.”

Photographer becomes filmmaker

Brown took up photography when he was a child. He followed his passion and became a photojournalist at the Santa Maria Times in California before he took a job at West Virginia University as a multimedia producer.

“Leaving the news business made me even more hungry to tell these kinds of stories,” Brown said and, outside of work, he planned to work on a photo essay about a Pentecostal, snake-handling family he met. The family ran a small church, but when Brown went to their sermons, he realized “still photos could not capture what was going on.”

Mark Brown. (Courtesy of Mike Ekern)

He’d always been interested in documentary film-making and he made his first short documentary about the family and their church. “Sermon of the Serpent” won best short documentary in 2014 at the Minneapolis St. Paul International Film Festival.

Brown, originally from Long Prairie, Minn., moved back to Minnesota and started working at the University of St. Thomas in 2014. He’s now director of photography for the university’s marketing department. He’s teaching at the university for the first time this semester, an introductory photo and video course.

Brown, 47, calls documentary filmmaking his “passion project.” When he started, he was single and living on his own. In the time that he’s been working on “The Fishing Hat Bandit,” he got married; he and his wife now have two children and live in Roseville.

The film is “something I’ve chipped away at,” Brown said of his working on it between his full-time job and family life. “It literally just finished in time” for the Minneapolis St. Paul International Film Festival.

Related: A look at six Minnesota films and events at the Minneapolis St. Paul International Film Festival

‘Wonder where that guy is now?’

When Brown settled back in Minnesota, he started looking for his next film project. He especially enjoys watching true crime documentaries and set out to make his own.

Brown was living out of state in 2005 when Whitrock was arrested in the bank robberies, but he remembered reading about the case in the news. The FBI said at the time they believed the Fishing Hat Bandit set a record for the most bank robberies in Minnesota; since then a man pleaded guilty in 2013 to holding up 31 banks in less than a year.

John Whitrock, 56, of Burnsville, was arrested Jan. 7, 2005, after a robbery at Real Financial Center in Edina. (AP Photo/Edina Police Dept.)

A federal grand jury indicted Whitrock, then 56, in 2005. He pleaded guilty to 21 bank robberies between July 2003 and January 2005 in St. Paul, West St. Paul, Inver Grove Heights, Roseville and beyond. Often seen wearing a bucket-style hat on video surveillance footage, Whitrock walked into banks, threatened to pull out a gun and demanded cash.

Brown thought, “I wonder where that guy is now?” It was 2015 when Brown sent his first letter to Whitrock in prison, introducing himself as a documentary filmmaker who was curious about his story. They corresponded by letters and phone calls in 15-minute increments until 2018, when Whitrock was released from prison and he moved to Iowa to live with a relative.

Brown started taking road trips to interview Whitrock, thinking he would make a short documentary.

“If you didn’t know his history, you would think he’s a very typical guy in his 70s,” Brown said of Whitrock.

Whitrock realizes it wasn’t ‘victimless crime’

A still frame of John Whitrock from the documentary “The Fishing Hat Bandit.” (Courtesy of Twin Town Films)

As Brown planned his film, he didn’t want the victims to be an afterthought.

“I was genuinely curious about what it was like to be on the other end of these robberies,” Brown said. “I wasn’t going to make just a profile piece about John. … I wanted to see how it really impacted people.”

Brown was able to track down nearly all the tellers who’d been robbed. Most wanted to leave it in the past, but four agreed to let Brown interview them for the documentary.

Meanwhile, Whitrock had told Brown “he had always kind of convinced himself that this was a victimless crime.” That was until he took a mandated victim-impact class in prison and “he really had come to this epiphany” that he’d been wrong, Brown said.

From prison, Whitrock wrote letters and mailed them to each bank he targeted, addressing them, “To the teller I robbed,” and apologizing, but he was never sure if the victims received them, Brown said.

Teller thought demand note was a joke

One of the tellers who took part in the documentary is Brent Haupt, who worked at Highgrove Community Federal Credit Union in St. Paul’s Highland Park at the time. It was the first robbery in the string of cases to which Whitrock pleaded guilty.

“(Whitrock) walked in and looked a little odd because he had a coat and leather gloves on and it’s the end of July and 90 degrees outside,” Haupt said recently of the 2003 robbery.

The man approached Haupt and handed him a demand note. It was Haupt’s ninth day working for the credit union and the first day at that location.

Haupt thought at first it was a joke and he was being put to the test at his new job. But the man patted his waistband, as though he had a weapon, and told Haupt, “I’m serious.”

Related Articles

Crime & Public Safety |


Manhattan court must find a dozen jurors to hear first-ever criminal case against a former president

Crime & Public Safety |


North St. Paul’s new police chief is 10-year veteran of department

Crime & Public Safety |


‘Justice for Isaac,’ teen’s parents say after Nicolae Miu found guilty in Apple River homicide

Crime & Public Safety |


Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg says Trump’s hush money criminal trial isn’t about politics

Crime & Public Safety |


Mother and children who died in Anoka County park incident identified

Haupt reconsidered: “That would be a pretty cruel joke or pretty cruel test to do,” and he followed his training about how to handle a robbery. He handed the money over to the man — “it all happens in just a blink,” he said.

Haupt, then 27, talked to the FBI and was ready to get back to work for the day, but the credit union sent him home and told him to relax. He returned to work the next day with co-workers expressing amazement, “You came back?”

“I said, ‘Yeah, why wouldn’t I? This is just just part of the job, I guess,’” he said. He said he’s told people over the years about the robbery as an interesting story that happened to him, but he knows other tellers were deeply changed by the experience.

Left traumatized

Whitrock says he never had a gun during the robberies, though the demand notes he passed to tellers threatened that he did. Another teller who is part in the documentary, Dawn Jewkes, remained “really traumatized” by the robbery, Brown said.

A black and white photo from surveillance video of the Aug. 4, 2004 robbery of American Bank in St. Paul. John Whitrock, the “Fishing Hat Bandit,” admitted that he was responsible for robbing 21 banks and credit unions between July 2003 and January 2005. (Courtesy of the FBI)

“John had mentioned that he wanted to find a way to express how sorry he was for doing this to people,” Brown said.

Brown traveled to North Dakota to interview Jewkes, where she now lives, about the robbery in Richfield. She told him she remembered receiving Whitrock’s apology letter and Brown asked if she’d be interested in meeting Whitrock. She said “yes,” but Brown said he knew he wasn’t qualified to “bring someone who is traumatized face-to-face with their perpetrator without possibly doing more harm.”

Brown enlisted the help of Brenda Burnside, CEO of Let’s Circle Up Restorative Services in St. Paul. “That’s the culmination of the movie — I don’t want to give too much away,” Brown said recently. “It’s the third act and it’s what brings the story into the present.”

Kelly Nathe, a documentary programmer at the Minneapolis St. Paul International Film Festival, said they watch hundreds of films before deciding which ones will be in the festival. They pay close attention to Minnesota-made films and, because Brown worked on his for years, “it was on our radar” and they were looking forward to him completing it, Nathe said.

“He assembled a film that is entertaining and riveting and really brings people on a ride that also tells the side of the story that people don’t often think about when they think about bank robbers — the effect on the bank tellers and and the residual effects of that trauma.”

The films from Minnesota filmmakers always sell out, Nathe said, and she suggests people who are interested get tickets as soon as possible.

What’s next for filmmaker

Brown is a member of Docuclub MN, an informal group of Minnesota documentary filmmakers, and he said he talked to people there about his approaches to the film. Chris Newberry, who became producer of “The Fishing Hat Bandit,” met Brown through Docuclub.

“The biggest draw for me was Mark himself,” Newberry said of why he wanted to work on the project. “I really admire Mark as a filmmaker, a storyteller.” And the premise of the film was compelling to him — that a bank robber was prolific enough to get a nickname, and his journey after prison of “trying to figure out what his life was all about,” Newberry said.

Also contributing to the film is composer Charlie McCarrran, of St. Paul, who wrote 60 minutes of original music for the 81-minute film.

Brown said he made “The Fishing Hat Bandit” on a shoestring budget. “It’s a $200,000 film, but we did it out of pocket for maybe $50,000 over nine years,” he said.

He received a $10,000 grant from the Minnesota State Arts Board, and raised $25,000 through Kickstarter to pay the editor, sound mixer, composer and colorist. Other friends in the local filmmaking community donated their time and equipment to help him. The rest was self-funded.

The experience of working on “The Fishing Hat Bandit” changed how Brown views his work and he only wants to focus on criminal justice stories going forward.

He’s already begun working on his next project: He’s filming inside the Stillwater prison’s new tattoo shop, which is providing apprenticeships to people who are incarcerated and want to pursue a career in the tattoo industry when they’re out of prison. He doesn’t yet know when it will be finished.

“Hopefully sooner than a decade,” he said.

How to watch ‘The Fishing Hat Bandit’

“The Fishing Hat Bandit” will be screened April 19 and 20 at the Minneapolis St. Paul International Film Festival and April 21 in Rochester, Minn. There will be a question-and-answer session with Brown, Whitrock and other collaborators after each of the three screenings. Tickets can be purchased at mspfilm.org.

The documentary also will be shown at the Julien Dubuque International Film Festival in Iowa on April 25 and 27.

Brown has submitted his documentary to other film festivals around Minnesota and the U.S., but he doesn’t know yet which ones may accept it. Upcoming screenings will be listed at thefishinghatbandit.com/screenings.

Related Articles

Crime & Public Safety |


‘The Greatest Hits’ review: Time travel-by-song hook is catchy in fantasy-romance

Crime & Public Safety |


A look at six Minnesota films and events at the Minneapolis St. Paul International Film Festival

Crime & Public Safety |


Review: ‘The First Omen’ is a prequel with style, plus borderline NC-17 body horror

Crime & Public Safety |


How Anna Paquin and Stephen Moyer waited years for ‘A Bit of Light’

Crime & Public Safety |


‘Monkey Man’ review: Patel impresses in front of, behind camera with revenge-fueled film

Israel bracing for potential direct attack from Iran in days

posted in: Politics | 0

By Donato Paolo Mancini, Jennifer Jacobs and Alex Wickham, Bloomberg News

Israel is bracing for a direct and unprecedented attack by Iran on government targets as soon as Saturday, according to people familiar with western intelligence assessments, a move that has the potential to trigger an all-out regional war.

The assault from Iranian soil has emerged as one of the main scenarios expected by the Jewish state and its allies, said the people, who asked not to be identified as they aren’t authorized to discuss the matter publicly. A bombardment with drones and precision missiles could come within the next 48 hours, they said.

The U.S. is preparing defenses and has moved additional military assets to the region, while intensifying diplomatic efforts to rein in hostilities, the people said. The move still hasn’t been approved by Tehran’s highest-ranking officials, they said.

Brent crude futures, the international oil benchmark, jumped as much as 1.8% to more than $91 a barrel in London on Friday, extending the year-to-date advance to 18%.

A Iranian missile and drone barrage would represent a retaliation for a deadly attack on its diplomatic compound in Syria last week, which the Islamic Republic blames on Israel. Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei has repeatedly said Israel will be “punished” for the assault, though stopped short of saying what form such a counter move would take.

Two of the people said it’s possible that the increasingly inflammatory rhetoric between Israel, Iran, and the U.S. could be grandstanding, but said the working assumption for Israel and allies is that an attack is imminent. Diplomatic back-channels are in overdrive, the people said.

U.S. officials including Jake Sullivan and Brett McGurk have been working to send messages to Iran, including through an established Swiss channel, one of the people said, while talking to Israel, Saudi Arabia, Qatar and other governments.

Bloomberg News reported on Wednesday the U.S. and allies were expecting a major escalation of hostilities, with targeted attacks on Israeli government and military sites. The Jewish State hasn’t claimed or denied responsibility for the Damascus attack, in keeping with a decades-long policy of ambiguity on operations in Syria, Lebanon and elsewhere.

A direct Israel-Iran conflict would significantly rachet up hostilities in the Middle East, where tensions have been rising since Israel began its war against Hamas, an Iranian proxy group, in Gaza in October. Other members of the Islamic Republic’s so-called Axis of Resistance, chiefly Hezbollah in Lebanon and the Yemen-based Houthis, have stepped up their aggression in recent months.

The esclating hostilities have drawn direct intervention from senior diplomats. U.K. Foreign Secretary David Cameron warned Iran Thursday that an attack would escalate and drag in a wider array of actors.

Western officials said intelligence showed Iran is preparing an attack on Israel “any day after Eid,” the Muslim holiday celebrated on April 10, adding the next 48 hours were critical to see if the message to diffuse tensions had successfully reached Tehran.

With assistance from Alberto Nardelli.

©2024 Bloomberg L.P. Visit bloomberg.com. Distributed by Tribune Content Agency, LLC.

Related Articles

World News |


More aid is supposed to be entering the Gaza Strip. Why isn’t it helping?

World News |


A mission of mercy, then a fatal strike: How an aid convoy in Gaza became Israel’s target

World News |


Thomas Friedman: Israel: Cease-fire, get hostages, leave Gaza, rethink everything

World News |


An Israeli airstrike in Gaza kills 3 sons and 4 grandchildren of Hamas’ top leader

World News |


The Latest | Blinken says Israel hasn’t told US of any specific date for Rafah ground invasion

How immigrant workers in US have helped boost job growth and stave off a recession

posted in: News | 0

By PAUL WISEMAN, GISELA SALOMON and CHRISTOPHER RUGABER Associated Press

MIAMI (AP) — Having fled economic and political chaos in Venezuela, Luisana Silva now loads carpets for a South Carolina rug company. She earns enough to pay rent, buy groceries, gas up her car — and send money home to her parents.

Reaching the United States was a harrowing ordeal. Silva, 25, her husband and their then-7-year-old daughter braved the treacherous jungles of Panama’s Darien Gap, traveled the length of Mexico, crossed the Rio Grande and then turned themselves in to the U.S. Border Patrol in Brownsville, Texas. Seeking asylum, they received a work permit last year and found jobs in Rock Hill, South Carolina.

“My plan is to help my family that much need the money and to grow economically here,” Silva said.

Her story amounts to far more than one family’s arduous quest for a better life. The millions of jobs that Silva and other new immigrant arrivals have been filling in the United States appear to solve a riddle that has confounded economists for at least a year:

How has the economy managed to prosper, adding hundreds of thousands of jobs, month after month, at a time when the Federal Reserve has aggressively raised interest rates to fight inflation — normally a recipe for a recession?

Increasingly, the answer appears to be immigrants — whether living in the United States legally or not. The influx of foreign-born adults vastly raised the supply of available workers after a U.S. labor shortage had left many companies unable to fill jobs.

More workers filling more jobs and spending more money has helped drive economic growth and create still-more job openings. The availability of immigrant workers eased the pressure on companies to sharply raise wages and to then pass on their higher labor costs to their customers via higher prices that feed inflation. Though U.S. inflation remains elevated, it has plummeted from its levels of two years ago.

“There’s been something of a mystery — how are we continuing to get such extraordinary strong job growth with inflation still continuing to come down?’’ said Heidi Shierholz, president of the Economic Policy Institute and a former chief economist at the Labor Department. “The immigration numbers being higher than what we had thought — that really does pretty much solve that puzzle.’’

Workers tend to cows in the milking parlor at the Flood Brothers Farm, Monday, April 1, 2024, in Clinton, Maine. Foreign-born workers make up fully half the farm’s staff of nearly 50, feeding the cows, tending crops and helping collect the milk — 18,000 gallons every day. (AP Photo/Robert F. Bukaty)

While helping fuel economic growth, immigrants also lie at the heart of an incendiary election-year debate over the control of the nation’s Southern border. In his bid to return to the White House, Donald Trump has attacked migrants in often-degrading terms, characterizing them as dangerous criminals who are “poisoning the blood” of America and frequently invoking falsehoods about migration. Trump has vowed to finish building a border wall and to launch the “largest domestic deportation operation in American history.” Whether he or President Joe Biden wins the election could determine whether the influx of immigrants, and their key role in propelling the economy, will endure.

The boom in immigration caught almost everyone by surprise. In 2019, the Congressional Budget Office had estimated that net immigration — arrivals minus departures — would equal about 1 million in 2023. The actual number, the CBO said in a January update, was more than triple that estimate: 3.3 million.

Thousands of employers desperately needed the new arrivals. The economy — and consumer spending — had roared back from the pandemic recession. Companies were struggling to hire enough workers to keep up with customer orders.

The problem was compounded by demographic changes: The number of native-born Americans in their prime working years — ages 25 to 54 — was dropping because so many of them had aged out of that category and were nearing or entering retirement. This group’s numbers have shrunk by 770,000 since February 2020, just before COVID-19 slammed the economy.

Related Articles

Business |


US-China competition to field military drone swarms could fuel global arms race

Business |


St. Paul City Council green-lights hotel at Allianz Field

Business |


Ramsey County judge keeps lawsuit alive over potential Bremer Bank sale

Business |


What to know about Elon Musk’s ‘free speech’ feud with a Brazilian judge

Business |


Outdoor gear industry facing challenges after “insane” post-pandemic growth

Filling the gap has been a wave of immigrants. Over the past four years, the number of prime-age workers who either have a job or are looking for one has surged by 2.8 million. And nearly all those new labor force entrants — 2.7 million, or 96% of them — were born outside the United States. Immigrants last year accounted for a record 18.6% of the labor force, according to the Economic Policy Institute’s analysis of government data.

And employers welcomed the help.

Consider Jan Gautam, CEO of the lodging company Interessant Hotels & Resort Management in Orlando, Florida, who said he can’t find American-born workers to take jobs cleaning rooms and doing laundry in his 44 hotels. Of Interessant’s 3,500 workers, he said, 85% are immigrants.

“Without employees, you are broken,” said Gautam, himself an immigrant from India who started working in restaurants as a dishwasher and now owns his own company.

“If you want boost the economy,” he said, “it definitely needs to have more immigrants coming out to this country.”

Or consider the workforce of the Flood Brothers farm in Maine’s “dairy capital’’ of Clinton. Foreign-born workers make up fully half the farm’s staff of nearly 50, feeding the cows, tending crops and helping collect the milk — 18,000 gallons each day.

“We cannot do it without them,” said Jenni Tilton-Flood, a partner in the operation.

For every unemployed person in Maine, after all, there are two job openings, on average.

“We would not have an economy, in Maine or in the U.S. if we did not have highly skilled labor that comes from outside of this country,” Tilton-Flood said in a phone interview with The Associated Press from her farm.

“Without immigrants — both new asylum-seekers as well as our long-term immigrant contributors — we would not be able to do the work that we do,” she said. “Every single thing that affects the American economy is driven by and will only be saved by accepting immigrant labor.”

A study by Wendy Edelberg and Tara Watson, economists at the Brookings Institution’s Hamilton Project, has concluded that over the past two years, new immigrants raised the economy’s supply of workers and allowed the United States to generate jobs without overheating and accelerating inflation.

In the past, economists typically estimated that America’s employers could add no more than 60,000 to 100,000 jobs a month without overheating the economy and igniting inflation. But when Edelberg and Watson included the immigration surge in their calculations, they found that monthly job growth could be roughly twice as high this year — 160,000 to 200,000 — without exerting upward pressure on inflation.

“There are significantly more people working in the country,” Fed Chair Jerome Powell said last week in a speech at Stanford University. Largely because of the immigrant influx, Powell said, “it’s a bigger economy but not a tighter one. Really an unexpected and an unusual thing.’’

Trump has repeatedly attacked Biden’s immigration policy over the surge in migrants at the Southern border. Only about 27% of the 3.3 million foreigners who entered the United States last year did so through as “lawful permanent residents’’ or on temporary visas, according to Edelberg and Watson’s analysis. The rest — 2.4 million — either came illegally, overstayed their visas, are awaiting immigration court proceedings or are on a parole program that lets them stay temporarily and sometimes work in the country.

“So there you have it,’’ Douglas Holtz-Eakin, a former CBO director who is president of the conservative American Action Forum, wrote in February. “The way to solve an inflation crisis is to endure an immigration crisis.”

Many economists suggest that immigrants benefit the U.S. economy in several ways. They take generally undesirable, low-paying but essential jobs that most U.S.-born Americans won’t, like caring for children, the sick and the elderly. And they can boost the country’s innovation and productivity because they are more likely to start their own businesses and obtain patents.

Ernie Tedeschi, a visiting fellow at Georgetown University’s Psaros Center and a former Biden economic adviser, calculates that the burst of immigration has accounted for about a fifth of the economy’s growth over the past four years.

Critics counter that a surge in immigration can force down pay, particularly for low-income workers, a category that often includes immigrants who have lived in the United States longer. Last month, in the most recent economic report of the president, Biden’s advisers acknowledged that “immigration may place downward pressure on the wages of some low-paid workers” but added that most studies show that the impact on the wages of the U.S.-born is “small.”

Even Edelberg notes that an unexpected wave of immigrants, like the recent one, can overwhelm state and local governments and saddle them with burdensome costs. A more orderly immigration system, she said, would help.

The recent surge “is a somewhat disruptive way of increasing immigration in the United States,” Edelberg said. “I don’t think anybody would have sat down and said: ‘Let’s create optimal immigration policy,’ and this is what they would come up with.”

Holtz-Eakin argued that an immigration cutoff of the kind Trump has vowed to impose, if elected, would result in “much, much slower labor force growth and a return to the sharp tradeoff’’ between containing inflation and maintaining economic growth that the United States has so far managed to avoid.

For now, millions of job vacancies are being filled by immigrants like Mariel Marrero. A political opponent of Venezuela’s authoritarian President Nicolás Maduro, Marrero, 32, fled her homeland in 2016 after receiving death threats. She lived in Panama and El Salvador before crossing the U.S. border and applying for asylum.

Her case pending, she received authorization to work in the United States last July. Marrero, who used to work in the archives of the Venezuelan Congress in Caracas, found work selling telephones and then as a sales clerk at a convenience store owned by Venezuelan immigrants.

At first, she lived for free at the house of an uncle. But now she earns enough to pay rent on a two-bedroom house she shares with three other Venezuelans in Doral, Florida, a Miami suburb with a large Venezuelan community. After rent, food, electricity and gasoline, she has enough left over to send $200 a month to her family in Venezuela.

“One hundred percent — this country gives you opportunities,’’ she said.

Marrero has her own American dream:

“I imagine having my own company, my house, helping my family in a more comfortable way.”

Wiseman and Rugaber reported from Washington, Salomon from Miami.