Column: Cannes we not? This year’s film festival left a sour taste

posted in: News | 0

Each year, the Cannes Film Festival offers an early glimpse of some of the most ambitious filmmaking about to hit the market, with a forward-facing emphasis on the art rather than the commerce of cinema. (Make no mistake, behind the scenes the latter is a key element of the festival as well.) But something about this year’s fest, which wrapped Saturday, left a sour taste. Filmmakers seemed disconnected from reality. The concerns of festival workers about unfair labor conditions were barely covered by U.S. journalists. And the self-congratulatory way the celebrity industrial complex kept chugging along as if nothing was amiss in the world felt … amiss.

At least that’s how it played out for me, taking it all in Stateside. Apparently many of the films are quite good. I won’t be writing about that here because I haven’t seen them yet. What I can comment on is the vibe and a general sense of cluelessness emanating from the festival this time out.

Writing for the Hollywood newsletter The Ankler, Claire Atkinson found that nearly everyone she spoke to “at the rooftop parties, in the street, in the see-and-be-seen hotel lobbies or even over the phone, says the same thing: This is the year that excitement about movies has returned.”

That may be wishful thinking. It was business as usual at the star-studded press conferences and red carpet events. But “the movies” as we know them are undergoing an existential crisis. What kind of theatrical life is any film destined to have? Director Sean Baker echoed this concern when he picked up the top prize Palme d’Or for his romantic comedy “Anora.” The world, he said, “has to be reminded that watching a film at home, while scrolling through your phone and checking emails and half-paying attention is just not the way, although some tech companies would like us to think so. Watching a film with others in a movie theater is one of the great communal experiences.”

Director Sean Baker poses with the trophy during a photocall after he won the Palme d’Or for the film “Anora” during the closing ceremony at the 77th annual Cannes Film Festival in Cannes, France, on May 25, 2024. (Sameer Al-Doumy/AFP/Getty Images/TNS)

Alas, box office results have been telling a different story. The walls are crumbling down around the industry, but the parties on yachts continued unabated and the pro forma standing ovations following screenings were dutifully timed and reported by journalists, as if this information meant something.

A primary concern of the Hollywood strikes last year was the threat of AI, not that you’d know it at Cannes, where a producer was on hand with a “sizzle reel of AI-translated trailers of international films,” according to the Hollywood Reporter, noting the tech is a “chance for hit international films to cheaply produce a high-quality English-language dub that will make them more attractive for the global market.” That’s bad news for actors who make a living dubbing foreign films. It gets worse. Also being shopped was a biopic about Vladimir Putin that uses AI to re-skin an actor with Putin’s face, creating a deep fake. The film’s Polish director Patryk Vega, also known as Besaleel, told the Hollywood Reporter that he predicts “film and TV productions will eventually employ only leading and perhaps supporting actors, while the entire world of background and minor characters will be created digitally.” Perhaps in the coming years, Cannes will simply introduce a new award category called the AI d’Or.

Let’s turn to filmmakers who are still doing it the old fashioned way. Francis Ford Coppola brought his $120 million, years-in-the-making allegory of our times “Megalopolis” to Cannes in the hopes of finding a buyer. At his press conference he noted, “It’s not people who become politicians who are the answer (to our nation’s problems) but the artists of America.” A lofty statement. But if he genuinely believes it, who does he think will fund and distribute films that challenge and critique the very systems studios actually benefit from? (Coppola is an outlier who is rich enough to self-fund his latest movie.)

Here’s what was conspicuously missing from much of the coverage around Coppola: Only days earlier, a report emerged that the filmmaker behind “The Godfather” and “Apocalypse Now” had allegedly behaved inappropriately during the filming of some scenes for “Megalopolis.” According to The Guardian: “Coppola came on to the set and tried to kiss some of the topless and scantily clad female extras. He apparently claimed he was ‘trying to get them in the mood.’”

Related Articles


How Viggo Mortensen’s mother helped inspire his Western ‘The Dead Don’t Hurt’


Review: ‘The Beach Boys’ is a sentimental documentary that downplays the band’s squabbles


Movie review: Action-packed ‘The Garfield Movie’ bridges generation gap


What to stream: Catch up with Zendaya’s big 2-movie start for 2024


‘Atlas’ review: Originality lacking in sci-fi flick starring Jennifer Lopez

These accusations were seemingly a non-issue at Cannes. Perhaps that’s fitting. One of Coppola’s stars who walked the red carpet was Shia LaBeouf, who is being sued by former girlfriend FKA Twigs. The civil case, which is pending, alleges “‘relentless’ abuse by the actor, including claims that he strangled her, knowingly infected her with a sexually transmitted disease and threatened to crash a car they were both in.” Producers were also at Cannes pre-selling a crime drama to star LaBeouf.

Other producers were selling an action-thriller starring James Franco. Two years ago, he settled a class action lawsuit brought by former acting students alleging they were sexually exploited by him. The presence of both LaBeouf and Franco prompted Variety to ask: “Is anyone really canceled in Cannes?” The Ankler’s Atkinson quoted a culture editor at at French TV channel who said 75% of the films at this year’s fest have a female protagonist “seeking revenge, fighting back, finding her place.” How does that square with Cannes welcoming, with open arms, men who put real women in those kinds of circumstances?

Meanwhile, Cate Blanchett was at the fest promoting a dark comedy called “Rumours,” about world leaders who find themselves lost in the woods, literally. Sitting for an interview, she talked about the persistent lack of women working behind the camera: “There’s 50 people on set and there’s three women. It’s like, when is this going to deeply, profoundly shift?” Her concern rings hollow: Blanchett is an A-list talent who is likely key in securing financing — if she believes things need to change, she could start by leveraging her own clout.

Cate Blanchett at the 77th annual Cannes Film Festival. (Andreas Rentz/Getty Images)

Even the red carpet — heavily photographed for its supposed glamour — took on a nasty tinge this year. Singer Kelly Rowland attended a premiere and was rudely hustled up the steps by an usher who kept her arm extended behind Rowland as a barrier, as if she were a bouncer escorting a rowdy patron off the premises. Afterwards, Rowland said: “There were other women that attended that carpet who did not quite look like me and they didn’t get scolded or pushed off or told to get off.” The same usher was subsequently filmed being aggressive with at least three other women, going so far as to physically accost one of them.

Kelly Rowland arrives for the screening of the film “Marcello Mio” at the 77th annual Cannes Film Festival in Cannes, France, on May 21, 2024. (Antonin Thuillier/AFP/Getty Images/TNS)

The fest has long cultivated a culture of elitism and exclusion, as Deadline critic Valerie Complex put it, writing about her experiences a couple years ago as one of the few Black writers in attendance. The microaggressions, she said, were constant: “I sat down in a reserved row, and three different seat ushers came over to my seat to check my ticket to make sure I was in the proper place. They weren’t checking anyone else’s tickets, just mine.”

Let’s wrap it up on a positive note, because there was one bright spot at the fest this year: Yet another dog to steal everyone’s heart. Last year’s Palm Dog winner (a real award) was Messi, the dog in “Anatomy of a Fall.” This year the honor went to a mixed breed named Kodi, who appears in the Swiss-French film “Dog on Trial,” a courtroom drama about a lawyer who takes on a dog — who has bitten three people — as a client. The story is apparently loosely based on a real case in France.

If Cannes is going to the dogs, at least there are actual dogs around to lighten the mood.

Nina Metz is a Tribune critic

How Viggo Mortensen’s mother helped inspire his Western ‘The Dead Don’t Hurt’

posted in: News | 0

The opening scenes of Viggo Mortensen’s “The Dead Don’t Hurt” are vintage Hollywood Western – there’s a killing in a Nevada bar, a lawman shot down on a dusty street and a trial in which the rich and powerful protect the guilty and railroad an innocent man, which culminates in his hanging. The sheriff, Holger Olsen (Mortensen), who has just buried his beloved wife, is disgusted by what happens and turns in his badge, taking his son and riding off. 

While Mortensen wrote and directed this as a Western – there are languid shots of gorgeous scenery and another classic confrontation near the climax – after those early scenes, it subverts the genre, operating more as a tragic love story and a character study. The protagonist is not Olsen but his wife, Vivienne (a captivating Vicky Krieps), as the movie travels back to tell the story of their relationship (along with flashbacks to her childhood). When Olsen insists on leaving her to fight for the Union in the Civil War, the film stays with this clear-eyed and independent woman at their homestead as she suffers her own war wound and struggles to make a life in turbulent surroundings. 

Defying expectations is, ironically, par for the course for Mortensen. While he launched to stardom in the “Lord of the Rings” films and has earned three Oscar nominations, many of his subsequent films (“A History of Violence,” “Eastern Promises,” “The Road,” “Captain Fantastic”) were far smaller and riskier. The first film he wrote and directed most definitely falls into that category: “Falling” was about a gay man trying to care for his independent, stubborn and homophobic father as he declines from dementia.

And then there’s his life away from movies: Mortensen is a painter, photographer, poet, and musician (he wrote the score for both of his movies). He also founded Percival Press to publish books of art and poetry that might not find a home in the more commercial marketplace.

Mortensen recently discussed the inspirations for and shooting of “The Dead Don’t Hurt” by video; his enthusiasm for the project was palpable as he shot past our allotted time and after the press team urged him to move on to the next interview he decided to stick around for one last question. This interview has been edited for length and clarity.

Q. “Falling” was personal for you in terms of parent-child bonds and being a caretaker for someone with Alzheimer’s. With this one you’ve said you started with an image of your mom as a girl in the woods, playing out the stories she later told you. That’s the launching point for this story; where did the rest come from?

I wrote it in 2020 during the lockdown and maybe that’s why I was thinking about open spaces and being able to move freely. And yes, it was based on her as this strong-willed, independent little girl with lots of imagination. My mother became a woman who was that way, but I thought it would be interesting to put her in a time and place dominated by a few unscrupulous men who weren’t averse to using violence – was a bigger challenge for her character.

My mother also introduced me to the movies. All her life we would go to the movies and she always talked about story, so I wanted to explore male-female relationships but also what happens to girls and women when the men go out to fight their wars. Usually, the film goes with those guys and maybe you get a glimpse of the woman once in a while. Having an ordinary woman, with courage and decency, be the main character made it more unusual. 

Q. Did you see this as a Western or was that just a framework for your character study and love story?

I wanted to make a classic Western visually and in terms of attention to detail. I didn’t think, ‘Oh, I’ll put this woman in that period and use the Western as a springboard.’ I thought, ‘Let’s just put her in a Western. The Western has been stretched in all kinds of directions. I’m making the kind of movie I want to see. 

And I’m aware that once someone else sees it, it becomes their movie – they see it from a different perspective. I like the handing over, I’m not afraid of it. Now, I want to ask you, how do you think Western fans will see this movie?

Q. I think those opening scenes will draw people in, but I wonder about people who come in with expectations of a Viggo Mortensen Western, whether they’ll expect you to be Aragorn as a sheriff.

I think if something is attractive to an audience in the first 20 minutes, they’ll hang in there. So it might be a challenge for those average guys going to see a Western but they might not dislike it.

Q. The advantage you have is that Vicky Krieps is so fantastic and her character is so distinctive that maybe it will appeal to people who don’t just want a Western.

I hope so. I’ve done Q&As in Europe and Mexico so far, and people have said, “I don’t like Westerns, but I like this movie.” 

Between 1910 and 1960, there were probably over 7,000 Westerns made. Maybe 1 or 2% were really good movies. But that’s true in any genre. And there are some really profound ones, original films that weren’t just regurgitating the same storylines and superficial mythology of the West and the foundation of the country. The ones that are good are on a level of poetry, as profound as anything that human beings have come up with in terms of stories.

Q. How relevant were you trying to make this? It’s a character study but there are issues of class, corruption, injustice, race, xenophobia and misogyny that resonate today.

I don’t start writing the movie or even edit it from a conceptual standpoint or ideological one. But everything that I’m living and taking in from the news today and since I was a kid and all the movies I’ve seen come into play. This is the story I’m telling with the tools I have in my head and my psychology.

There were things I thought of as I was writing it, comparing it to what’s going on these days. But any story about human beings, whether set in the Stone Age or the future, if it’s well written and acted you’ll draw parallels to your family or community or country. I think it’s inevitable. 

At the Q&As, people do comment on present society and politics and I see that those connections can be made, but people won’t even go to the trouble to make connections if they’re not interested in the story. 

Related Articles


Review: ‘The Beach Boys’ is a sentimental documentary that downplays the band’s squabbles


Movie review: Action-packed ‘The Garfield Movie’ bridges generation gap


What to stream: Catch up with Zendaya’s big 2-movie start for 2024


‘Atlas’ review: Originality lacking in sci-fi flick starring Jennifer Lopez


Documentary filmmaker Morgan Spurlock, who skewered fast food industry, dies at 53

Some people are down on the economy — here’s why we should care

posted in: Adventure | 0

By Elizabeth Renter | NerdWallet

When you ask people how they’re doing, you often get a knee-jerk “fine” or “good” without much introspection. But lately, when you ask people about the economy, they have clear feelings.

Related Articles

Business |


Best cities for freelancers and self-employed workers 2024

Business |


Hitting the road? Expect higher gas prices over Memorial Day

Business |


Here’s how much you have to earn to qualify as middle class, new study says

Business |


St. Paul credit union program pairs borrowing and saving to financially empower underserved communities

Business |


The IRS gets back on its feet. Time to crack down on wealthy cheaters

Over the past several years, the economy has been remarkable, in a literal sense; there has been a lot to talk about. Inflation rose to levels we hadn’t seen in about 40 years, and home prices climbed roughly 50%. The Federal Reserve stepped in to fight inflation. Interest rates reached territory they hadn’t touched in 20 years or more, but they did so without triggering a recession. Economic growth has remained high and the labor market strong. All of these factors have resulted in a cacophony of narratives about the economy, which is very likely playing a role in people’s perceptions.

A new survey from NerdWallet, conducted online by The Harris Poll among more than 2,000 U.S. adults, reveals a disconnect that illustrates these perceptions well. When asked how they feel about a variety of economic and financial topics now compared with 12 months ago, Americans were nearly twice as likely to feel worse than better about the state of the U.S. economy in general. Yet they were slightly more likely to feel better than worse about the state of their own personal finances.

Over the past 12 months, the survey period we asked about, the economy has actually remained strong, and the post-pandemic recovery has carried on better than expected. Consumers continue spending, which is typically taken as a sign of confidence. It may be tempting to disregard negative sentiment if we can’t confirm it’s rooted in current economic reality. But that sentiment may provide clues to yet-unseen problems and potentially drive behavior changes that could have significant economic impact.

Half of Americans are feeling worse about the economy

People’s perceptions are colored by their background, personality traits and exposure to information, among many other things. And these perceptions don’t always reflect demonstrable reality, particularly when you ask about how people feel. Asking about perceptions and focusing on an emotional component can give people explicit permission to detach their experience from what the actual evidence might show. And often, it’s likely our feelings that govern our behaviors, whether we’re talking about managing relationships or spending money.

About half (49%) of Americans say they feel worse about the state of the U.S. economy in general now compared to 12 months ago, according to the NerdWallet survey conducted in April. Just 26% feel better. Among the questions asked, this one garnered the strongest opinions — it had the lowest rate of people who neither felt better nor worse.

Twelve months before this survey, the economic indicators most people would encounter in daily living were pretty close to where they are now. Unemployment was a low 3.4%; now, it’s still low by historical standards, at 3.9%. Gas prices were relatively the same: $3.71 per gallon on average then and $3.73 now. One major improvement over that one-year period can be found in price growth, however. Inflation in April 2023 was near 5%. Now, it’s closer to 3.5%. In fact, wages are now growing faster than prices.

When asked to look more locally — how they feel about the state of their personal finances now versus 12 months ago — one-third (33%) of Americans feel better and 29% feel worse. Parents of minor children are more likely (39%) than non-parents (31%) to feel better.

What’s driving the disconnect?

The disconnect between how people feel about the economy at large and how they feel about their household finances seems counterintuitive. By most official measures, the economy is strong. If feelings or perspectives run contrary to that, one source of the negative sentiment could be personal experience. In other words, if I feel bad about the economy when the economy is doing well, maybe it’s because my personal financial situation is not so great. But a modest segment of Americans hold these two seemingly disparate feelings simultaneously: 18% of those who feel worse about the economy now than they did 12 months ago say they feel better about their personal finances over the same period.

There are many other possible explanations for the perception of a worsening economy, including:

1. We could be measuring the economy wrong (maybe it’s not doing as well as we think). The COVID-19 pandemic didn’t just shake the economy, it shook economic data too. This explanation might not be the most likely, however, as the people responsible for economic data are experts in their field. If someone’s going to get it right, it’s likely them. Data collection, benchmarking and seasonal adjustments have all been impacted and continue to be accounted for.

2. Exposure to negative stories in the news or social media could be coloring people’s outlook on the economy’s health. The last high inflation period was a relative lifetime ago, in the 1980s. Then, our primary sources of economic information came at regularly scheduled and limited intervals: in the morning newspaper or in front of the evening newscast, for example. Now, economic data is everywhere you look, translated by both experts and social media influencers alike. This consistent attention to the economy’s measurements could be having an outsized impact on our perception of its well-being.

3. The housing market could be playing an outsized role in overall economic perspectives. If there’s one section of the economy that is undoubtedly difficult, it’s the housing market. Under current conditions — high home prices, a paltry number of homes available for sale and high borrowing costs — even if someone has taken steps to position themselves to buy, they’ll be met with difficulties. Healthy household finances can only get you so far if you’re trying to buy a home in this unfriendly market, and confronting these roadblocks on the path to a long-term financial goal can be very discouraging.

4. We’re aware that even though we might be doing better personally, others aren’t so fortunate. Aggregate measures of the economy conceal a lot of nuance. Unemployment is low on a national scale, but people are still unemployed. Wage growth is outpacing inflation, but not everyone is receiving raises. Even if you personally aren’t experiencing any downside to this economy, knowing that others are may color your views. This isn’t necessarily a bad thing — empathy across the economy can drive meaningful community involvement and policies that improve the well-being of others.

What we shouldn’t do is assume that people just don’t understand the economy and write off the disconnect as immaterial. At some point, how we feel about the economy can impact how we act. It can affect decisions such as whether now’s a good time to buy a new car, invest in the stock market or start a new business. For business owners, it can impact hiring and investment decisions. And all of these spending and saving decisions can ultimately impact the health of the economy, feeding into official data. Consumer expenditures account for about two-thirds of total GDP, for example. So how we feel about things, no matter the driving force, can impact economic reality. And that makes this sentiment worth listening to.

Elizabeth Renter writes for NerdWallet. Email: elizabeth@nerdwallet.com. Twitter: @elizabethrenter.

Quick Fix: Chicken Milanese with Spaghetti Pomodoro

posted in: News | 0

By Linda Gassenheimer, Tribune News Service

Bring a taste of Italy to your table with this quick and easy dinner. Thin chicken cutlets with a light, crisp coating is a winner.

The thin cutlets take less than 5 minutes to cook. They’re finished off with some capers and lemon juice. I serve them with spaghetti and tomato sauce, Spaghetti Pomodoro.

Related Articles


Quick Fix: Steak Fajita Pizza


Gyoza is an easy-to-make Japanese comfort food


Recipes: Celebrate spring by making these dishes with asparagus


This Asparagus, Sorrel and Pine Nut Salad is easy, bright and delicious


Recipe: Steven Raichlen’s Italian-inspired Grilled Artichokes

HELPFUL HINTS:

Any type of pasta sauce can be used. Look for one that has reduced sodium.

Any style of long pasta such as linguine, fettucine or spaghettini can be used.

COUNTDOWN:

Place water for pasta on to boil.

Prepare all ingredients.

Start pasta cooking.

Make chicken dish.

Complete pasta dish.

SHOPPING LIST:

To buy: 3/4 pound chicken cutlets, 1 container plain panko breadcrumbs, 1 small piece Parmesan cheese, 1 bottle ground oregano, 1 small bottle capers, 1 lemon, 1 bunch fresh basil, 1 package spaghetti and 1 bottle reduced-sodium pasta sauce.

Staples: olive oil, egg, salt and black peppercorns.

Chicken Milanese

Yield 2 servings

Recipe by Linda Gassenheimer

3/4 pound chicken cutlets

1/4 cup plain panko breadcrumbs

2 tablespoons freshly grated Parmesan cheese

2 teaspoons ground oregano

Salt and freshly ground black pepper

1 egg, slightly beaten

2 teaspoons olive oil

1 lemon cut into wedges

1 tablespoon capers

Place chicken cutlets on a cutting board and cover with plastic wrap.
Pound the cutlets flat to 1/4 inch thick with a meat bat or heavy skillet.
On a plate, mix panko crumbs, Parmesan cheese, oregano and add salt and pepper to taste.
In a small bowl, slightly beat egg with fork. Dip the chicken cutlets into the egg and then into the panko crumb mixture, making sure both sides are covered.
Heat oil in a large nonstick skillet over medium-high heat and add the cutlets. Cook 2 minutes, turn over and cook second side 2 minutes. A meat thermometer should read 155 degrees.
Divide the cutlets between 2 dinner plates and squeeze juice from the lemon wedges on top. Sprinkle the capers over the chicken.

Per serving: 359 calories (34 percent from fat), 13.5 g fat (3.4 g saturated, 4.8 g monounsaturated), 223 mg cholesterol, 44.9 g protein, 11.8 g carbohydrates, 1.2 g fiber, 404 mg sodium.

Spaghetti Pomodoro

Yield 2 servings

Recipe by Linda Gassenheimer

4 ounces spaghetti

1 cup reduced-sodium pasta sauce

1/4 cup fresh basil leaves, torn into small pieces

Salt and freshly ground black pepper

Bring a large saucepan 3/4 full of water to a boil. Add the spaghetti and cook for 9-10 minutes or according to package instructions.
Remove 1/4 cup pasta water to a bowl.
Drain the spaghetti and add to the bowl with the pasta sauce.
Add the basil and salt and pepper to taste. Toss well.
Divide into 2 portions and serve with the Chicken Milanese.

Per serving: 277 calories (9 percent from fat), 2.8 g fat (0.4 g saturated, 0.6 g monounsaturated), 3 mg cholesterol, 9.3 g protein, 53 g carbohydrates, 4.2 g fiber, 42 mg sodium.

Linda Gassenheimer is the author of over 30 cookbooks, including her newest, “The 12-Week Diabetes Cookbook.” Listen to Linda on www.WDNA.org and all major podcast sites. Email her at Linda@DinnerInMinutes.com.

©2024 Tribune Content Agency, LLC