St. Paul: Ashland Ave. tenants see 28%-50% rent hikes despite rent control

posted in: All news | 0

The three small apartment buildings along the 900 block of Ashland Avenue date to the early 1900s, and tenants and housing advocates say living conditions there show it, even from the outside.

They’ve pointed to deteriorating foundations, water leaks, wobbly decks and open electrical covers. They’ve complained of broken locks, low water pressure, heavy mold, insects, mice and double-hung windows that cannot be locked and slide open from the top on their own.

”I signed a lease to live here, and there’s rights that come with that lease, and those rights are not being met,” said Lillian Johnson, who has lived at the property for about a year.

So residents of the 12 units were taken aback when they received notice that their rents — which range from $875 for a two-bedroom basement unit to $1,600 for a three-bedroom apartment — would soon go up by more than 28%, despite the protections offered by the city’s rent control ordinance.

Then came news that the center duplex would see an additional rent increase due to electrical rewiring and other capital improvements, bringing the total rent hike for those two apartments to about 50%.

In 2021, city residents voted to cap annual residential rent increases at 3%, but the rules allow landlords to self-certify higher rents after accounting for construction, property taxes and other expenses.

‘A fair return on investment’

Scott Day, son of property owner Judith Day, said his mom bought the buildings in 1998 after living in them herself for three years and marrying the maintenance man. She became fast friends with many of her tenants over the decades, but is now 87-years-old, suffers dementia and uses a wheelchair.

Landlord Scott Day testifies during a rent control appeals hearing at St. Paul City Hall on Thursday, July 17, 2025. (John Autey / Pioneer Press)

He said Thursday he was learning of alleged code violations for the first time, and that expenses were adding up.

”I will do everything in my power to resolve whatever problems my tenants have,” said Scott Day, during a rent increase appeal hearing at City Hall.

“My mom had never gone through this process before,” he added, noting he’s planning to install a $23,000 boiler to one of the buildings. “It just came down to the necessity of numbers. One right we do have as landlords is a fair return on investment, and we haven’t been getting that.”

Rent control appeal hearing

The tenants fighting their rent increases were represented by the St. Paul-based Housing Justice Center before the city’s legislative hearing officer on Thursday afternoon in individual hearings, held one by one, unit by unit. Their attorneys said city officials have made clear through past decisions that a ruling impacting one apartment does not necessarily apply to every unit in a building, and each case must be taken up separately.

The tenants, through their attorneys, have pointed to language in the city’s rent stabilization ordinance that protect lease-holders from large rent hikes if a building has serious habitability issues.

In addition to cracked walls and visible holes in the ceiling, tenant Chloe Cable testified Thursday that a smoke detector near her bedroom had expired, and she discovered through testing that six of the eight electrical outlets in her apartment were not grounded, even though they have three prongs.

A cloth wrapped electrical cord hangs from the ceiling to supply electricity to a bare bulb in a unit at an apartment complex in a rent control dispute in St. Paul on Thursday, July 17, 2025. (John Autey / Pioneer Press)

The tenants hired John Trostle, a housing inspections consultant, to conduct walk-throughs and document concerns.

“There’s deferred maintenance,” said Trostle, pointing to water seepage, “pretty serious” laundry room and bathroom mold, and foundation issues during the public appeal hearing.

”There’s a wooden balcony. It’s very shaky. If you had several people on there at once … this thing could collapse,” he said. “The buildings were suffering from pretty severe settling issues.”

The two duplex units — one occupied by families with children — were not vacated during the recent electrical rewiring work, despite potential hazards associated with lead paint and asbestos, said Jim Poradek, an attorney with the Housing Justice Center.”

“Unless it’s proven otherwise, paint of a certain age is presumed to have lead,” Poradek said. “That’s federal law. It’s a well-known hazard that’s taken seriously by the industry.”

City staff certified 28% rent increase

Scott Day has maintained that physical improvements, property tax increases and other operating expenses — as well as an increase in the number of tenants — necessitated rent hikes much greater than 3%, as allowed under the city’s rent control ordinance.

City staff examined his rent rolls and other financial documents and informed tenants through letters issued in April and May that the rent increases would be granted.

The three attorneys from the Housing Justice Center — Poradek, Emily Curran and Abbie Hanson — noted that exceptions to the city’s rent control ordinance are only supposed to kick in if a property has been kept up to “minimal maintenance and habitability standards” and that “a landlord promises to follow federal, state and local health and safety code.”

Legislative Hearing Officer Marcia Moermond discusses points of law during a rent control appeals hearing at St. Paul City Hall on Thursday, July 17, 2025. (John Autey / Pioneer Press)

The attorneys were able to provide legislative hearing officer Marcia Moermond videos of recent basement flooding, as well as a list of possible city fire and property maintenance code violations.

“Those were and are being violated,” Hanson said. “There’s water infiltration. There’s mold. There’s locks that don’t work. There’s fridges without consistent temperature regulation. … The list goes on. … Many of the things at these properties are not in reasonable repair.”

Later in the hearing, Scott Day told Moermond he respected the right of tenants to have due process, but as a landlord, his mother also has rights.

“Communication is key,” said Scott Day. “I can’t see through walls. … I don’t want my tenants feeling unsafe. We’re not monsters. Just tell me what the problem is. They went directly to the city first.”

No previous complaints

City staff have noted they had not previously received any formal complaints of fire code violations and there were no open inspections cases involving the properties.

“These aren’t yet investigated. They haven’t been given to the department” of Safety and Inspections, Moermond told the attorneys on Thursday.

Moermond asked Trostle if he considered the properties uninhabitable, and he responded he would not go that far, though the wobbly deck alone could be “catastrophic.”

Samuel Perkins, right, and his partner Chloe Cable, talk about the health and safety issues with their and their neighbors apartments in St. Paul on Thursday, July 17, 2025. (John Autey / Pioneer Press)

The St. Paul City Council will have final say over the appeals, based in part on Moermond’s recommendation. She said she expected any additional written materials to be shared with her office by early August, paving the way for a hearing before the council on Sept. 10.

Appeals can take a while

In a phone interview this week, Poradek and Hanson noted the city has a previous track record of rescheduling rent control appeals and sitting on them for months. They pointed to a similar case, where Sumeya Mohamed, the occupant of a Winthrop Street apartment building on the city’s East Side, fought a 26% rent increase.

The legislative hearing officer took that case under advisement in August 2023, not delivering a recommendation to the city council until the summer of 2024.

In August 2024, the city council unanimously sided with Mohamed. By then, she and her family had already moved out.

Questions about surrogacy are raised in case of California couple with house brimming with kids

posted in: All news | 0

By ED WHITE

The removal of 21 children from the custody of a Los Angeles-area couple has put a spotlight on the practice of using surrogates to build a family. Surrogacy has no federal regulation, leaving it up to states to set the rules if they choose to allow it.

Related Articles


Beef prices have soared in the US — and not just during grilling season


In American life, a growing and forbidding visual rises: the law-enforcement officer in a mask


US Justice Department wants no prison time for ex-officer convicted in Breonna Taylor raid


Settlement reached in investors’ lawsuit against Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg and other company leaders


‘Fear is the tool of a tyrant,’ fired federal prosecutor Maurene Comey tells colleagues

The kids — 15 at the couple’s mansion and six more living elsewhere — were taken by an LA County child welfare agency in May after the parents were accused of failing to intervene in the abuse of a baby by a nanny, police in Arcadia said.

The children range in age from 2 months to 13 years, with most between 1 and 3, police said. The FBI won’t comment but agents are investigating. Silvia Zhang, 38, and Guojun Xuan, 65, have not responded to emails seeking comment.

Police believe Zhang gave birth to one or two of the children while the rest were born by surrogate. Some women who were paid surrogates for the couple now say they were unaware that the couple was accumulating a supersize family, raising questions about their intentions.

“What were they going to do with these children?” said Deborah Wald, a lawyer in San Francisco whose expertise includes surrogacy law.

What is surrogacy?

Surrogacy is an agreement between parties to have a woman become pregnant, typically through an embryo transfer, and deliver a baby. The intended parent or parents might struggle with infertility. They also could be same-sex couples.

There’s no limit on how many children someone can have through surrogates or any other method, said Wald, who is not involved in the Arcadia case.

The home of Silvia Zhang and Guojun Xuan is seen on Wednesday, July 16, 2025, in Arcadia, Calif., where a number of children were removed from the couple’s home after a child abuse allegation in May, according to Arcadia police. (AP Photo/Jae C. Hong)

She acknowledged that California is considered a “surrogacy-friendly state” because it has clear laws around the process.

Both sides are required to have lawyers, and there must be a written, notarized contract before an embryo transfer, Wald said.

“The legitimate surrogacy community in California is very distressed when things like this happen,” Wald said of surrogates feeling deceived. ”We’ve worked very hard on legal and ethical standards. It hurts everyone when something like this happens.”

Matchmaker role

There are businesses that act as matchmakers, connecting surrogates to people who want to have children. State business records show a company called Mark Surrogacy Investment LLC had been registered at the Arcadia address of Zhang and Xuan.

It’s not clear if Zhang and Xuan set up the business solely to find surrogates for themselves. State records show the company terminated its business license in June.

An aerial view shows the home of Silvia Zhang and Guojun Xuan on Wednesday, July 16, 2025, in Arcadia, Calif., where a number of children were removed from the couple’s home after a child abuse allegation in May, according to Arcadia police. (AP Photo/Jae C. Hong)

Wald said there are no special licensing requirements in California for businesses that match surrogates with intended parents.

Many questions remain

Wald said there should have been plenty of checks and balances in the process, noting the role of fertility clinics in handling embryos.

“The first place typically is the matching program that matches the surrogate with an intended parent. But in this situation the intended parents were the matching program,” Wald said. “I am not familiar with any other prior case where that was true.”

Arcadia police said the six children who were not at the couple’s home were found with family friends. The couple’s house was “set up for a school environment,” Lt. Kollin Cieadlo said.

Zhang and Xuan were accused of neglect and arrested in May. Charges were not formally pursued at that time in order for an abuse investigation to continue, and detectives now believe there were other instances of abuse, Cieadlo said.

A 2-month-old infant with a traumatic head injury, allegedly at the hands of a nanny, remains in a hospital in stable condition, he said.

MPR says rescission bill will ‘dismantle the public media system as we know it’

posted in: All news | 0

Local public media outlets are bracing for a potential $1.1 billion cut over two years for the Corporation for Public Broadcasting, which has earmarked more than $17 million for 16 Minnesota organizations, both large and small.

The St. Paul-based Minnesota Public Radio anticipates the cuts, which have already passed in the Senate, will earn enough votes in the House and dismantle the public media system as we know it, said Megan Ryan, communications director for MPR and its parent company American Public Media.

“We are looking at how we balance our strategic priorities and investments in the face of these cuts,” Ryan said. “Between state and federal funding sources, MPR is facing a loss of more than $6 million this fiscal year, about 6.5 percent of our budget. We have already begun a comprehensive review of our expense structure to find cost-saving solutions.”

The White House has said the public media system is politically biased and an unnecessary expense.

The package also cancels nearly $8 billion for a variety of foreign aid programs, many designed to help countries where drought, disease and political unrest endure.

Along with concerns for the programs targeted, opponents warned against allowing the executive branch to direct a party-line cancellation of investments that had been approved on a bipartisan basis, the Associated Press reported.

Big hit for community radio

Minneapolis jazz station KBEM, aka JAZZ88, was granted more than $122,000 from CPB in fiscal year 2024. Station manager Johnny Lee Walker said that’s about a tenth of the organization’s budget.

“Doesn’t sound like much, but it really is,” Walker said. “It would affect news (and) programming, in addition to the delivery and technical services for those programs and others. This would not shut down KBEM, but at a time of limited funding from other sources, this would make it very difficult to continue running KBEM at its current level as one of the strongest voices for jazz in the United States.”

The volunteer-based community radio station KFAI shared a similar outlook.

Related Articles


Fridley boy, 15, pleads guilty to fatally shooting man on St. Paul’s North End


St. Paul considers: Allow pedicabs during rush hour?


Baseball Hall of Famer Dave Winfield to be honored at Toni Stone Stadium


Girl, 7, hospitalized with life-threatening injuries after driver strikes her in St. Paul


BCA: St. Paul man fired at 3 officers, injured 2 bystanders as restaurant tried to close doors

“KFAI is a living expression of the Twin Cities — building bridges, deepening understanding and uplifting people across cultures, neighborhoods and generations,” said general manager and executive director Nora Doherty. “More than once in KFAI’s history, CPB support meant the ability to do this work. Now, CPB funding makes up just eight percent of KFAI’s budget, but its impact is catalytic. It allows us to leverage state and local dollars, helping community radio remain what it was intended to be: local, independent and representative of the interests of the people, not shareholders.”

Twin Cities Public Television, based in St. Paul, did not respond to a request for comment Thursday.

The Senate narrowly approved a $9 billion rescission bill that includes the CPB cuts early Thursday. The bill is now back at the House, which approved an earlier version. Lawmakers have a midnight Friday deadline to pass the bill.

Attorneys sue to restore deportation protections for abused and neglected migrant children

posted in: All news | 0

By VALERIE GONZALEZ

Attorneys representing migrant children who were abused, neglected or abandoned by a parent asked a federal court on Thursday to restore their deportation protections after the Trump administration ended them.

Related Articles


Trump says Coke will shift to cane sugar. But increasingly, shoppers want no sugar in their sodas


US says it destroyed 500 metric tons of expired food aid but it won’t affect future distribution


Maryland man charged with threatening Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene and her family


Here’s what to know about chronic venous insufficiency


Trump won’t recommend special counsel in Epstein investigation, spokeswoman says

The lawsuit, filed in the Eastern District of New York, was filed on behalf of nine young people and their legal advocates who want a judge to keep the protections for up to nearly 150,000 beneficiaries.

“These young people have survived abuse, abandonment, and neglect only to be retraumatized now by the constant threat of detention and deportation from the same agencies that vowed to keep them safe,” said Rachel Davidson, plaintiff attorney with the National Immigration Project.

The Department of Homeland Security and U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services were both named in the lawsuit. USCIS Spokesman Matthew J. Tragesser said, “As a matter of practice, USCIS does not comment on pending litigation.” DHS did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

Migrant children who suffered parental abuse, neglect or abandonment are designated through state courts and the federal government with Special Immigrant Juvenile Status, which was created by Congress in 1990 with bipartisan support.

SIJS, as it is known, does not grant legal status. But it lets qualifying young people apply for a visa to become legal permanent residents and obtain a work permit. It can take years for a visa to become available due to annual caps. In 2022, the Biden administration allowed children to be shielded from deportation while waiting for a visa.

In June, the Trump administration ended deportation protection for SIJS beneficiaries. Without it, they can still wait in the U.S. for a visa but cannot receive work authorization. And if they are deported while they are waiting, they will no longer be eligible to become legal permanent residents.

Though overshadowed by higher-profile moves to end birthright citizenship and halt asylum at the border, the policy shift is part of President Donald Trump’s sweeping immigration system overhaul intended to make it more difficult for people to legally remain in the U.S.

A Guatemalan teen who is living in New York and living with her older brother is one of the plaintiffs. She said through attorneys, who omit using the names of minors, that her dreams of becoming an astronaut one day may be cut short if she’s unable to continue high school for fear of deportation.

“I felt that I was finally in a safe environment, but if I had to return to (Guatemala), I would be very afraid of the violence and abuse from my mother and father,” she said in a statement shared by the attorneys without her name.

The policy shift may shut down a legal pathway to possible citizenship for nearly 150,000 migrants who attorneys estimate have received this classification and are stuck in the visa backlog.

It could keep them from obtaining Social Security cards, driver’s licenses, medical treatment, health insurance, higher education, bank accounts, and, for older youth, legal and safe employment opportunities.