World Economic Forum head Børge Brende steps down following pressure over Epstein links

posted in: All news | 0

GENEVA (AP) — World Economic Forum head Børge Brende said Thursday that he is stepping down after facing pressure over his contacts with the late sex offender Jeffrey Epstein.

Brende, a former Norwegian foreign minister, said in a statement that he had decided “after careful consideration” to step down as president and chief executive of the forum, known for its annual January summit in the Swiss Alpine resort of Davos.

Related Articles


Israeli strike kills 2 Palestinians in Gaza, health officials say, the latest deaths as truce stalls


Ukraine says Russia launched a major aerial attack before Kyiv’s talks with US


US and Iran hold another round of indirect nuclear talks as American forces mass in Mideast


Today in History: February 26, Trayvon Martin shot to death


Cuba says it killed 4 people aboard Florida-registered speedboat that opened fire on soldiers

“I am grateful for the incredible collaboration with my colleagues, partners, and constituents, and I believe now is the right moment for the Forum to continue its important work without distractions,” Brende said in a statement released by the WEF.

Brende was Norway’s foreign minister from 2013-2017 and is one of several prominent Norwegians who have faced scrutiny following the latest release of Epstein files.

He didn’t refer directly to that controversy in Thursday’s statement, but the WEF announced earlier this month that it was opening an internal review into Brende to determine his relationship with Epstein after files indicated the two had dined together several times and exchanged messages.

Brende told Norwegian broadcaster NRK at the time that he was cooperating with the investigation, that he only met Epstein in business settings and that he had been unaware of Epstein’s criminal background.

WEF co-chairs André Hoffmann and Larry Fink said in a statement that “the independent review conducted by outside counsel has concluded. The findings stated that there were no additional concerns beyond what has been previously disclosed.”

They said that Alois Zwinggi will serve as the forum’s interim president and CEO.

How health care is keeping the job market afloat

posted in: All news | 0

The health care sector is doing the heavy lifting when it comes to jobs growth, and recent federal labor data shows that without it, the labor market would be in serious trouble.

Related Articles


Instagram says it will notify parents if teens ‘repeatedly’ search for terms related to suicide


US filings for jobless aid rise modestly to 212,000 as layoffs remain at historically healthy levels


Wall Street futures unchanged before the bell after Nvidia earnings beat expectations


Aldi confirms downtown location in former Lunds & Byerlys space by summer’s end


Eagan plans to use data center pause to study potential impacts

In fact, if you take health care and social assistance out of the picture for January data, overall growth would be barely noticeable, as most other sectors are treading water or falling behind.

The latest jobs report from the Bureau of Labor Statistics showed that total nonfarm payroll employment rose by 130,000 in January — and health care alone comprised nearly two-thirds of that total (63%). When health care is grouped with social assistance (as it usually is in federal data) the two sectors comprised 95% of all job growth in January.

This isn’t a one-month fluke. During 2025, health care job growth averaged 33,000 new jobs each month, while most sectors saw little change or declines throughout the year.

Health care job growth continues expanding

Since 2022, the change in the education and health services “supersector” has seen greater year-over-year growth than any other major sector. From 2024 through 2025, hiring increased by 2.86%, compared to the only other sectors with positive growth: utilities (+1.54%), leisure and hospitality (0.89%) and construction (+0.53%).

Over the past four years, as expressed by the total number of jobs added, health care has outpaced all other job sectors.

(Note: The chart below depicts “supersectors,” which means it groups health care with education services.)

The only other sector that’s close in total number of jobs added is professional and business services, which includes positions in legal and accounting services, advertising and administrative support.

However, December 2025 data from the most recent Job Openings and Labor Turnover Survey (JOLTS) report shows that professional and business services had one of the highest layoff and discharges — in both rates and absolute numbers — compared to other sectors, suggesting that it’s not performing as it once did.

By contrast, JOLTS data showed few people involuntarily left health care due to layoffs in December, while quits also remained low — both indicators of a strong, stable environment in the sector.

Why is health care employment so strong?

Health care is one of the few recession-proof job sectors — there will always be chronic conditions, illness and an aging population. That high demand creates a steady need for workers, and that need is only growing.

Elizabeth Renter, NerdWallet’s senior economist, says in an ideal world, job growth would be widely dispersed across industries. “However, a large aging population is helping to prop up demand for healthcare jobs, and this isn’t likely to subside anytime soon” she says.

Here’s why health care is likely to remain the strongest engine for U.S. job growth:

Aging population. The largest swath of the U.S. population — Baby Boomers — are entering the stage of life when health care needs are highest. A greater number of older adults means higher demand for home health care, hospitals and nursing homes, all of which require more staff.

Chronic diseases. Conditions like diabetes, heart disease, high blood pressure, obesity and cancers are rising, driving steady demand for care, including specialty and long-term support.

COVID-19 workforce impact. The high demand and stress on health care workers during the pandemic drove a mass exodus from the field, leading to ongoing job growth as hospitals and clinics continue to hire to fill empty positions.

Greater access to care. The expansion of government-sponsored health care has lowered financial barriers to access, leading to more people seeking health care services, including preventative care and screenings. More insured people means higher demand and greater staffing needs.

Evolving health care landscape. Technological advances, trends and new therapies are creating more jobs across hospitals, home care, outpatient centers, surgical clinics and more.

Barriers to entry keep labor demand high. Many health care positions need specific education and training, which limits competition. Some roles, especially specialty positions, can take longer to fill.

Health care hiring shows no signs of stopping, but if other sectors struggle to add jobs or layoffs rise, even strong health care growth may not be enough to keep the labor market from stumbling.

(To stay on top of financial news, sign up for NerdWallet’s free weekly newsletter, MoneyNerd.)

Anna Helhoski writes for NerdWallet. Email: anna@nerdwallet.com. Twitter: @AnnaHelhoski.

FBI fires agents who worked on Trump classified document investigation, AP sources say

posted in: All news | 0

By ERIC TUCKER and ALANNA DURKIN RICHER

WASHINGTON (AP) — The FBI has fired additional agents who worked on an investigation into President Donald Trump, this time terminating employees who participated in the probe into the Republican’s hoarding of classified documents, people familiar with the matter said Wednesday.

The firings are part of a broader personnel purge under the leadership of Director Kash Patel, a Trump appointee who, over the last year, has pushed out dozens of employees who either contributed to investigations of the president or who were perceived as not in alignment with the administration’s agenda. The Justice Department has engaged in similarly sweeping firings of prosecutors since Trump took office last year.

Related Articles


What Americans think about Trump’s judgment on military force as Iran talks resume: new AP-NORC poll


Hillary Clinton is testifying as part of the House investigation into Jeffrey Epstein


US and Iran hold another round of indirect nuclear talks as American forces mass in Mideast


Maduro’s lawyer says US is blocking Venezuela government from paying deposed leader’s drug defense


Justice Department says it’s reviewing whether any Epstein-related records were mistakenly withheld

The FBI Agents Association condemned the firings as unlawful and endangering national security.

“These actions weaken the Bureau by stripping away critical expertise and destabilizing the workforce, undermining trust in leadership and jeopardizing the Bureau’s ability to meet its recruitment goals — ultimately putting the nation at greater risk,” the association said in a statement.

The latest round of terminations included employees who helped investigate Trump’s retention of classified documents at his Mar-a-Lago resort, a case that involved a high-profile FBI search of the Florida property and resulted in a federal prosecution charging the now-president with holding onto top-secret records from his first term in office and obstructing government efforts to get them back.

The firings were confirmed to The Associated Press by multiple people familiar with the matter who spoke on anonymity because they could not publicly discuss the personnel moves. Several of the people said a total of 10 employees were fired, and one said at least 10 were fired.

The FBI has also fired agents who participated in a separate investigation into Trump’s efforts to overturn the results of the 2020 presidential election. That investigation also led to criminal charges, but like the Mar-a-Lago case, was abandoned by special counsel Jack Smith after Trump won the White House in November 2024 because of longstanding Justice Department legal opinions that say sitting presidents cannot be indicted.

The firings were revealed on the same day that Patel was quoted as telling Reuters the FBI during the Biden administration had subpoenaed his phone records and those of current White House chief of staff Susie Wiles. Patel said the action had occurred in 2022 and 2023 when they were private citizens.

Patel was subpoenaed by federal prosecutors in 2022 to testify before a grand jury in Washington in the Mar-a-Lago investigation, and appeared after being given immunity, the AP has previously reported.

What Americans think about Trump’s judgment on military force as Iran talks resume: new AP-NORC poll

posted in: All news | 0

By LINLEY SANDERS and STEPHANIE LIECHTENSTEIN

WASHINGTON (AP) — As the U.S. and Iran head into their next round of nuclear talks in Geneva, a new AP-NORC poll finds that many U.S. adults continue to view Iran’s nuclear program as a threat — but they also don’t have high trust in President Donald Trump’s judgment on the use of military force abroad.

About half of U.S. adults are “extremely” or “very” concerned that Iran’s nuclear program poses a direct threat to the United States, according to the new poll from The Associated Press-NORC Center for Public Affairs Research. About 3 in 10 are “moderately” concerned and only about 2 in 10 are “not very” concerned or “not concerned at all.”

Related Articles


Hillary Clinton is testifying as part of the House investigation into Jeffrey Epstein


US and Iran hold another round of indirect nuclear talks as American forces mass in Mideast


Maduro’s lawyer says US is blocking Venezuela government from paying deposed leader’s drug defense


Justice Department says it’s reviewing whether any Epstein-related records were mistakenly withheld


Ilhan Omar: Why was my State of the Union guest arrested?

The survey was conducted Feb. 19-23, as military tensions built in the Middle East between the United States and Iran. The U.S. is seeking a deal to limit Iran’s nuclear program and ensure it does not develop nuclear weapons, while Iran says it is not pursuing weapons and has so far resisted demands that it halt uranium enrichment on its soil or hand over its stockpile of highly enriched uranium.

Trump, who scrapped an earlier nuclear agreement with Iran during his first term, has repeatedly threatened to use force to compel Iran to agree to constrain its atomic program, which Trump claimed to have “obliterated” following the 12-day war in June where the U.S. bombed Iranian nuclear sites. Iran has said it would respond with an attack of its own. Trump has also threatened Iran over the killing of protesters. Both countries have signaled they are prepared for war if the talks on Tehran’s nuclear program fail, and the U.S. has assembled its largest military force in the Mideast in decades as tensions with Iran have risen.

Most Americans, 61%, say Iran is an “enemy” of the U.S., which is up slightly from a Pearson Institute/AP-NORC poll conducted in September 2023. But their confidence in the president’s judgment when it comes to relationships with adversaries and the use of military force abroad is low, the new poll shows, with only about 3 in 10 Americans saying they have “a great deal” or “quite a bit” trust in Trump.

Even some Republicans — particularly younger Republicans — have reservations about Trump’s ability to make the right choices on these high-stakes issues.

Most US adults have concerns about Trump’s judgment on military force

The Trump administration this year has held two rounds of nuclear talks with Iran under Omani mediation, with a third round scheduled to begin Thursday. Similar talks last year between the U.S. and Iran about Iran’s nuclear program broke down after Israel launched what became the 12-day war in June.

“We are in negotiations with them,” Trump said during his State of the Union address on Tuesday night, which took place after the poll was conducted. “They want to make a deal, but we haven’t heard those secret words: We will never have a nuclear weapon.”

Americans have significant reservations about Trump’s judgment on foreign conflicts, the AP-NORC poll shows. Only about 3 in 10 of U.S. adults have “a great deal” or “quite a bit” of trust in Trump’s judgment on the use of military force, relationships with U.S. adversaries or the use of nuclear weapons. More than half trust him “only a little” or “not at all.”

On each measure, Republicans are more likely than Democrats and Independents to trust that the president will make the right decisions. About 6 in 10 Republicans have a high level of trust in Trump, while roughly 9 in 10 Democrats have a low level of trust in him.

But some Republicans’ confidence is more qualified. Younger Republicans — those under 45 — are less likely than older Republicans to say they trust Trump “a great deal” or “quite a bit” on his use of military force. About half of younger Republicans say this, compared with about two-thirds of older Republicans.

President Donald Trump delivers the State of the Union address to a joint session of Congress in the House chamber at the U.S. Capitol in Washington, Tuesday, Feb. 24, 2026. (Kenny Holston/The New York Times via AP, Pool)

Many view Iran’s nuclear program as a threat

The new finding that 48% of U.S. adults are “extremely” or “very” concerned that Iran’s nuclear program poses a direct threat to their country is in line with an AP-NORC poll conducted in July 2025, indicating that even with recent escalations between the two countries, Americans have not changed their views.

Before the June war, Iran had been enriching uranium up to 60% purity, a short, technical step away from weapons-grade levels. The U.N. nuclear watchdog — the International Atomic Energy Agency — had said Iran was the only country in the world to enrich to that level that wasn’t armed with the bomb.

Iran has been refusing requests by the IAEA to inspect the sites bombed in the June war, raising the concerns of nonproliferation experts.

Worries about Iran’s nuclear program cross party lines in the U.S., though Republicans are currently more concerned. Most Republicans — 56% — say they are “extremely” or “very” concerned about Iran’s nuclear program, compared with 44% of Democrats.

Younger Americans are less worried about Iran

Americans generally hold a negative view of Iran, but the view is sharper among older Americans.

About 6 in 10 U.S. adults say Iran is an “enemy” of the United States, up slightly from 53% from the Pearson/AP-NORC poll from 2023. Roughly 3 in 10 say the countries are “not friendly, but not enemies,” and only about 1 in 10 Americans consider the two nations “friendly” or “close allies.”

At the same time, only about half of U.S. adults under 45 say Iran is an enemy, compared with about 7 in 10 Americans ages 45 and older. There is also a wide generational divide in concern about Iran’s nuclear program, with only about one-third of Americans under 45 saying they are highly concerned, compared with about 6 in 10 older Americans.

Tensions over Iran’s nuclear program have existed for decades, which may help explain why older Americans are more concerned. Nuclear talks had been deadlocked for years after Trump’s decision in 2018 to unilaterally withdraw the U.S. from Iran’s 2015 nuclear deal with world powers.

Liechtenstein reported from Vienna. AP reporter Jon Gambrell in Dubai contributed to this report.

The AP-NORC poll of 1,133 adults was conducted Feb. 19-23 using a sample drawn from NORC’s probability-based AmeriSpeak Panel, which is designed to be representative of the U.S. population. The margin of sampling error for adults overall is plus or minus 4.0 percentage points.

The Associated Press receives support for nuclear security coverage from the Carnegie Corporation of New York and Outrider Foundation. The AP is solely responsible for all content.

Additional AP coverage of the nuclear landscape: https://apnews.com/projects/the-new-nuclear-landscape/