Lindsey Vonn says surgery saved her from having her left leg amputated following Olympic crash

posted in: All news | 0

VAIL, Colo.— American skier Lindsey Vonn says she nearly lost her left leg following a frightening crash in the women’s downhill at the Milan Cortina Olympics.

Vonn shared in an Instagram post on Monday that her injuries went far beyond the complex tibia fracture in the leg she initially revealed after clipping a gate and sailing off course just 13 seconds into her run on Feb. 8.

The 41-year-old Vonn said the trauma from the crash led to compartment syndrome in the leg. Compartment syndrome involves excessive pressure building up inside a muscle, either from bleeding or swelling. High pressure restricts blood flow and can lead to permanent injury if not treated quickly.

“When you have so much trauma to one area of your body so that there’s too much blood and it gets stuck and it basically crushes everything,” Vonn said.

Vonn credited Dr. Tom Hackett, an orthopedic surgeon who works for Vonn and Team USA, for conducting a fasciotomy to salvage her leg.

“He filleted it open (and) let it breathe, and he saved me,” she said.

Vonn noted that Hackett was only in Cortina because she was competing after tearing the ACL in her left knee shortly before the Olympics.

“If I hadn’t had done that, Tom wouldn’t have been there (and he) wouldn’t have been able to save my leg,” she said.

Vonn, who said she has been discharged from the hospital, also broke her right ankle in the crash.

“It has been quite the journey and by far the most extreme and painful and challenging injury I’ve ever faced in my entire life times 100,” she said.

United States’ Lindsey Vonn crashes into a gate during an alpine ski women’s downhill race, at the 2026 Winter Olympics, in Cortina d’Ampezzo, Italy, Feb. 8, 2026. (AP Photo/Jacquelyn Martin, File)

Vonn underwent multiple surgeries during a week-long stay at a hospital in Treviso, Italy, following the accident. She credited both Hackett and Italian doctors for their efforts to repair her leg, which she said was “in pieces” following the accident.

She says she struggled with pain and blood loss in the immediate aftermath and had to receive a transfusion to help raise her hemoglobin levels.

Vonn, who said she is “very much immobile,” is confined to a wheelchair at the moment, but has turned her attention to her rehab and is working her way toward being able to use crutches. She estimated it will take about a year for the bones in her left leg to heal. Only after that will doctors be able to go in and repair the torn ACL, which played no role in the crash.

“It’s going to be a long road,” she said. “I always fight and we keep going.”

Vonn stressed she had “no regrets” about her comeback following a six-year retirement or her decision to ski at the Olympics despite the knee injury.

“I wish it had ended differently, but I’d rather go down swinging than not try at all,” said Vonn, who was atop the World Cup series rankings in the downhill when she arrived in Cortina. “I think what I was able to achieve was more than anyone expected to begin with. … This year was incredible and so worth everything.”

She likened her injuries to “one blip on the radar.” She did not go into any sort of detail about her competitive career, though her father, Alan Kildow, told The Associated Press shortly after the accident he would like her to retire.

“Life is life and we have to take the punches that come,” Vonn said. “Going to do the best I can with this one. It really knocked me down. But I’m like Rocky. I’ll just keep getting back up.”

Related Articles


FBI director joins US men’s hockey team in locker room celebration of Olympic gold medal


Olympic men’s hockey: Clash of the titans up next


Women’s curling: U.S. quest for first Olympic medal finishes just short


Lindsey Vonn has more surgery after Olympic crash


Olympic hockey: U.S. crushes Slovakia, to play Canada for gold medal

After Supreme Court rebuke, Democrats call for government to refund billions in Trump tariff money

posted in: All news | 0

By JOSH BOAK

WASHINGTON (AP) — A trio of Senate Democrats is calling for the government to start refunding roughly $175 billion in tariff revenues that the Supreme Court ruled were collected because of an illegal set of orders by President Donald Trump.

Sens. Ron Wyden of Oregon, Ed Markey of Massachusetts and Jeanne Shaheen of New Hampshire are unveiling a bill on Monday that would require U.S. Customs and Border Protection to issue refunds over the course of 180 days and pay interest on the refunded amount.

Related Articles


Supreme Court agrees to hear from oil and gas companies trying to block climate change lawsuits


Judge blocks release of special counsel Smith’s report on Trump classified documents case


US military moves forces and equipment out of northeast Syria base


State Department orders nonessential US diplomats to leave Lebanon as tensions with Iran soar


Rubio heads to Caribbean to reassert US interests after Venezuela strikes and Iran threats

The measure would prioritize refunds to small businesses and encourages importers, wholesalers and large companies to pass the refunds on to their customers.

“Trump’s illegal tax scheme has already done lasting damage to American families, small businesses and manufacturers who have been hammered by wave after wave of new Trump tariffs,” said Wyden, stressing that the “crucial first step” to fixing the problem begins with “putting money back in the pockets of small businesses and manufacturers as soon as possible.”

The bill is unlikely to become law, but it reveals how Democrats are starting to apply public pressure on a Trump administration that has shown little interest in trying to return tariff revenues after the Supreme Court announced its 6-3 ruling on Friday.

Because of the ruling, going into November’s midterm elections for control of Congress, Democrats have begun telling the public that Trump illegally raised taxes and now refuses to repay the money back to the American people.

Shaheen said that repairing any of the damage caused by the tariffs in the form of higher prices starts with “President Trump refunding the illegally collected tariff taxes that Americans were forced to pay.” Markey stressed that small business tend to have ”little to no resources” and a “refund process can be extremely difficult and time consuming” for companies.

The Trump administration has asserted that its hands are tied, because any refunds should be the responsibility of further litigation in court.

That message could put Republicans on the defensive as they try to explain why the government isn’t proactively seeking to return the money. GOP lawmakers had planned to try to preserve their House and Senate majorities by running on the income tax cuts that Trump signed into law last year, saying that tax refunds this year would help families.

Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent told CNN on Sunday that it’s “bad framing” to raise the question of refunds because the Supreme Court ruling did not address the issue. The administration’s position is that any refunds will be decided by lawsuits winding their way through the legal system, rather than by a president who has repeatedly stressed to voters that he has the ability to act with speed and resolve.

“It is not up to the administration — it is up to the lower court,” Bessent said, stressing that rather than offer any guidance he would “wait” for a court opinion on refunds.

Trump has defended his use of the 1977 International Emergency Economic Powers Act to impose broad tariffs on almost every U.S. trading partner, saying that his ability to levy taxes on imports had helped to end military conflicts, bring in new federal revenues and apply pressure for negotiating trade frameworks.

The University of Pennsylvania’s Penn Wharton Budget Model released estimates that the refunds would total $175 billion. That’s the equivalent of an average of $1,300 per U.S. household. But determining how to structure reimbursements would be tricky, as the costs of the tariffs flowed through the economy in the form of customers paying the taxes directly as well as importers passing along the cost either indirectly or absorbing them.

The president has previously claimed that refunds would drive up U.S. government debt and hurt the economy. On Friday, he told reporters at a briefing that the refund process could be finished after he leaves the White House.

“I guess it has to get litigated for the next two years,” Trump said, later amending his timeline by saying: “We’ll end up being in court for the next five years.”

The 2026 Minnesota team wrestling state tournament brackets

posted in: All news | 0

The team state wrestling tournament is a two-day affair this season, a departure from the longstanding, single-day format.

As part of the entire tournament adding an extra day of competition, the team portion will open with the quarterfinals Wednesday afternoon before competing in the semifinals later that evening, with the championship duals set for Thursday night.

Brackets for all three classes were recently unveiled.

The entire tournament will take place at Grand Casino Arena in downtown St. Paul, and can be viewed online on the Neighborhood Sports Network.

The complete brackets for each class are listed below and can be found on the MSHSL site.

Brackets will be updated daily on the website with results throughout the tournament.

Class 3A

Wednesday’s Quarterfinals, 4 p.m.

No. 1 St. Michael-Albertville vs. Brainerd

No. 4 Hastings vs. No. 5 Elk River

No. 2 Stillwater vs. Apple Valley

No. 3 Shakopee vs. Northfield

Wednesday’s Semifinals, 8 p.m.

STMA/Brainerd vs. Hastings/Elk River

Still/AV vs. Shak/Northfield

Thursday’s final, 7 p.m.

Semifinal winners

Class 2A

Wednesday’s quarterfinals, 4 p.m.

No. 1 Simley vs. South St. Paul

No. 4 Scott West vs. No. 5 Foley

No. 2 New Ulm vs. Totino-Grace

No. 3 Pierz vs. Perham

Wednesday’s semifinals, 8 p.m.

Simley/SSP vs. SW/Foley

New Ulm/TG vs. Pierz/Per

Thursday’s final, 7 p.m.

Semifinal winners

Class A

Wednesday’s quarterfinals, 6 p.m.

No. 1 Staples-Motley vs. Kenyon-Wanamingo

No. 4 United North Central vs. No. 5 Jackson County Central

No. 2 Minneota vs. LeSueur-Henderson

No. 3 Chatfield vs. West Central Area/Ashby/Brandon-Evansville

Wednesday’s semifinals, 8 p.m.

SM/KW vs. UNC/JCC

Minnesota/LSH vs. Chat/WCAAABE

Thursday’s final, 7 p.m.

Semifinal winners

Related Articles


Girls state hockey: Pioneers hang on to win 2A title


Girls state hockey: Breck wins Class A title


State gymnastics: North/Tartan’s Sydney Johnson wins two titles


Girls state hockey: Late power-play goal lifts Hill-Murray past Edina


State gymnastics: Monticello proves it belongs in 2A with team state title

Supreme Court agrees to hear from oil and gas companies trying to block climate change lawsuits

posted in: All news | 0

By LINDSAY WHITEHURST

WASHINGTON (AP) — The Supreme Court said Monday that it will hear from oil and gas companies trying to block lawsuits seeking to hold the industry liable for billions of dollars in damage linked to climate change.

The conservative-majority court agreed to take up a case from Boulder, Colorado, among a series of lawsuits alleging the companies deceived the public about how fossil fuels contribute to climate change.

Governments around the country have sought damages totaling billions of dollars, arguing it’s necessary to help pay for rebuilding after wildfires, rising sea levels and severe storms worsened by climate change. The lawsuits come amid a wave of legal actions in states including California, Hawaii and New Jersey and worldwide seeking to leverage action through the courts.

Suncor Energy and ExxonMobil appealed to the Supreme Court after Colorado’s highest court let the Boulder case proceed. The companies argue emissions are a national issue that should be heard in federal court, where similar suits have been tossed out.

“The use of state law to address global climate change represents a serious threat to one of our Nation’s most critical sectors,” attorneys wrote.

President Donald Trump’s administration weighed in to support the companies and urge the justices to reverse the Colorado Supreme Court decision, saying it would mean “every locality in the country could sue essentially anyone in the world for contributing to global climate change.”

Trump, a Republican, has criticized the lawsuits in an executive order, and the Justice Department has sought to head some off in court.

Attorneys for Boulder had agued that the litigation is still in early stages and should stay in state court. “There is no constitutional bar to states addressing in-state harms caused by out-of-state conduct, be it the negligent design of an automobile or sale of asbestos,” they wrote.

Follow the AP’s coverage of the U.S. Supreme Court at https://apnews.com/hub/us-supreme-court.