As Trump threatens more Guard troops in US cities, here’s what the law allows

posted in: All news | 0

By KONSTANTIN TOROPIN, Associated Press

WASHINGTON (AP) — Since sending the National Guard to Los Angeles and Washington, President Donald Trump has openly mused about sending troops to some of the nation’s most Democratic cities — including Chicago and Baltimore — claiming they are needed to crack down on crime.

Related Articles


Chicago is in the Trump administration’s sights for its next immigration crackdown


Want to work for National Weather Service? Be ready to explain how you agree with Trump


Sen. Ernst of Iowa is expected to announce next month that she won’t run for reelection in 2026


Appeals court blocks Trump administration from ending legal protections for 600,000 Venezuelans


Texas governor signs new voting maps pushed by Trump to gain five GOP seats in Congress in 2026

The threats to expand a federal intervention have legal experts and some military officials raising concerns that Trump is considering novel ways to use National Guard troops in American cities that could set up conflicts not seen since the civil rights era.

Though most violent crime has fallen in recent years in the cities Trump has called out, the Republican president said Democratic Illinois Gov. JB Pritzker “should be calling me, and he should be saying, ‘Can you send over the troops please?’ It’s out of control.”

Whether Trump can repeat what he’s done in LA and the nation’s capital — call up the National Guard and have it assist a surge of federal law enforcement and immigration officers — is an open question and likely to become a point of contention should he press forward.

Here’s a look at how Trump has used troops in U.S. cities, what the law allows and what could come next:

How Trump already has used the National Guard

Trump first deployed troops to Los Angeles in early June over Gov. Gavin Newsom’s objections by putting the California National Guard under federal jurisdiction, known as Title 10, to protect federal property from protests over immigration raids.

Besides 4,000 Guard members, Trump later sent 700 active duty Marines, and California sued over the intervention. The Guard went on to help protect officers during immigration arrests.

While Trump pushed the limits of the law, the lawsuit centers on whether the president was allowed to use the Guard to closely shadow federal law enforcement and whether that runs afoul of the prohibition on using the military as law enforcement, known as the Posse Comitatus Act, said Todd Huntley, director of the National Security Law Program at the Georgetown University Law Center.

Meanwhile, the unique status of the District of Columbia National Guard — Trump is their commander in chief — means he has been able to use it for everything from armed patrols to trash cleanup without any legal issues. Because it is on state and not federal orders, legal restrictions on law enforcement don’t come into effect.

“Where we have a big question mark” is whether “the governor of a state has to consent to the sending of troops to his state,” said Huntley, a retired Navy captain and judge advocate.

How this could play out in Chicago and other cities

The Trump administration is planning to surge officers to the nation’s third-largest city for an immigration crackdown, two U.S. officials said.

The Department of Homeland Security asked Naval Station Great Lakes outside Chicago for support on immigration operations, including with facilities and logistics, the base said this week. The Illinois National Guard and the base said they had not received requests regarding a mobilization of troops to Chicago.

If Trump wants the freedom to use the National Guard as he pleases in Chicago, the easiest legal path is to invoke the Insurrection Act — a vaguely worded 1792 law that allows the president to deploy federal troops inside the U.S. to conduct law enforcement, an exception to the restrictions of the Posse Comitatus Act.

The law offers sweeping powers to the president, envisioning armed conflict within the United States.

“The orders would be given by him … and the governor of the receiving state would not have a say in whether he allows them into the state or not or allows them to conduct a mission in the state,” Huntley said.

However, Huntley calls this “the nuclear option.”

A D.C. National Guard official, who spoke on condition of anonymity for fear of retaliation, said invoking the Insurrection Act over a broad topic like crime could allow the Guard to be deployed indefinitely.

Another possibility is Trump deploying the D.C. Guard, which he commands, to another state, the official said.

If the D.C. Guard is put on federal orders — something Trump has the power to do — it could lead to some rare situations, including federalized D.C. Guardsmen sent to another state that in turn could activate its own Guard as a counter, Huntley said.

The possibility is not without precedent.

“The resolution of that could be basically what we saw in Alabama during the civil rights era. To take the ability of that state governor of using state National Guard forces away, the president could simply federalize them,” Huntley said.

In 1963, President John F. Kennedy federalized the Alabama National Guard as part of the now-famous standoff with Gov. George Wallace, who refused to step aside and allow Black students to integrate the University of Alabama. Wallace eventually relented.

Members of the Louisiana National Guard patrol Union Station, Thursday, Aug. 28, 2025, in Washington. (AP Photo/Mariam Zuhaib)

How Trump’s new executive order on the National Guard affects what happens next

In an executive order signed Monday, Trump ordered Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth to create “a specialized unit” within the D.C. Guard “dedicated to ensuring public safety and order.”

He also directed Hegseth to ensure every state’s Guard is ready to assist federal and local law enforcement in “quelling civil disturbances and ensuring the public safety and order” when needed. It also calls for each to have units “reasonably available for rapid mobilization.”

The Pentagon has not given more details of what Trump’s order will mean for the National Guard. A defense official confirmed that Hegseth’s office was aware of the order and that they were reviewing it and its specific requirements.

All state Guards already have a “reaction force” that is aimed at responding to a wide variety of incidents with an initial force of 75-125 personnel within eight hours and a follow-on force of up to 375 personnel within 24 hours, according to a National Guard fact sheet.

And the D.C. National Guard already has a unit that is made up entirely of soldiers trained as military police.

Bookmaker linked to baseball star Shohei Ohtani’s interpreter sentenced to just over a year

posted in: All news | 0

By AMY TAXIN, Associated Press

SANTA ANA, Calif. (AP) — A Southern California bookmaker who took thousands of sports bets from the former interpreter for baseball star Shohei Ohtani was sentenced to just over a year in prison Friday.

Mathew Bowyer, now 50, had pleaded guilty a year ago to running an illegal gambling business, money laundering and filing a false tax return. He was sentenced to 12 months and one day in prison.

He will later be subjected to two years of supervised release. He was also ordered to pay $1.6 million in restitution to the Internal Revenue Service, which his lawyer said he’s already paid.

“The bottom line is, I am remorseful. I have made many poor choices in my life,” Bowyer told the court before sentencing, his voice trembling.

Federal prosecutors wanted Bowyer sentenced to 15 months in prison for running the scheme that placed hundreds of millions of dollars in bets and netted thousands of dollars each day. They said Bowyer could have faced a longer sentence but shouldn’t thanks to his significant assistance in their investigations.

The prosecutor declined to comment after Friday’s hearing.

U.S. District Judge John W. Holcomb said the sentence could have been longer, but both the government and Bowyer’s lawyer sought reductions.

Holcomb said he was impressed by Bowyer’s recent efforts to assist gambling addicts and the overwhelming support shown by Bowyer’s family and friends, more than a dozen who were in the courtroom Friday, but said he felt some prison time was necessary due to the tax crime.

“Despite the significant mitigation, there are consequences for committing these crimes,” Holcomb said.

Diane Bass, Bowyer’s attorney, wanted her client to be spared prison time entirely because of his “extraordinary acceptance of responsibility.” In a letter to the court, the father of five from San Juan Capistrano, California, said he began gambling as a teen by playing poker and betting on video games, and it later spiraled out of control.

“It is so easy to gamble everything away and fall into despair,” Bowyer wrote. “I am very sorry and embarrassed that I facilitated such dangerous risk-taking.”

Related Articles


Labor Day weekend has arrived. What to know about the holiday


Minneapolis, a series of shootings and the grim realities of a tough summer


Abrego Garcia’s lawyers worry he can’t get a fair trial and request gag order for top US officials


Fire departments concerned about cancer risks are buying gear that is free of forever chemicals


New Orleans marks 20th anniversary of Hurricane Katrina with solemn memorials, uplifting music

The case against Bowyer is part of a broader federal probe into illegal sports gambling that led to the arrest of Ohtani’s former Japanese language interpreter Ippei Mizuhara, who is currently serving a nearly five-year sentence for bank and tax fraud after stealing nearly $17 million from the Los Angeles Dodgers player.

Authorities said Bowyer ran an illegal gambling business for at least five years in Southern California and Las Vegas and took wagers from more than 700 bettors including Mizuhara, who had long worked with Ohtani and was regularly seen by his side.

While Mizuhara’s winnings totaled over $142 million, which he deposited in his own bank account and not Ohtani’s, his losing bets were around $183 million — a net loss of nearly $41 million. Investigators said Mizhuara wagered on sports other than baseball. Authorities said Ohtani was a victim in the case.

Bowyer cooperated with investigators in their prosecution of Mizuhara and in a case against the head of a large sports gambling business, federal prosecutors wrote in court filings. They said his “significant, timely, and credible” assistance helped authorities obtain two separate convictions.

Since then, Bowyer has been addressing his own gambling addiction and helping others overcome theirs, Bass wrote in court filings. He has also repaid $1.6 million in taxes, she said.

Operating an unlicensed betting business is a federal crime. Sports gambling is illegal in California, while most states and the District of Columbia allow some form of it.

Sports-betting scandals have made headlines in recent years, including one that led Major League Baseball to ban a player for life last year for the first time since Pete Rose was barred in 1989.

The league’s gambling policy prohibits players and team employees from wagering on baseball, even legally. MLB also bans betting on other sports with illegal or offshore bookmakers.

The league last year banned San Diego Padres infielder Tucupita Marcano and suspended four other players for betting on baseball legally. Marcano became the first active player in a century banned for life because of gambling.

Rose, whose playing days were already over, agreed to his ban in 1989 after an investigation found that he had placed numerous bets on the Cincinnati Reds to win from 1985 to 1987 while playing for and managing the team.

In Nevada, the case against Bowyer led gaming regulators to issue a $10.5 million fine against the Resorts World Casino on the Las Vegas strip. It was the second-largest fine handed down by the state’s gaming commission and settled a complaint accusing the casino of welcoming people with ties to illegal bookmaking.

Chicago is in the Trump administration’s sights for its next immigration crackdown

posted in: All news | 0

By REBECCA SANTANA and ELLIOT SPAGAT

WASHINGTON (AP) — President Donald Trump’s administration plans to surge officers to Chicago for an immigration crackdown in its latest move to expand the federal law enforcement presence in major Democratic-run cities, according to two U.S. officials.

Related Articles


As Trump threatens more Guard troops in US cities, here’s what the law allows


Want to work for National Weather Service? Be ready to explain how you agree with Trump


Sen. Ernst of Iowa is expected to announce next month that she won’t run for reelection in 2026


Appeals court blocks Trump administration from ending legal protections for 600,000 Venezuelans


Texas governor signs new voting maps pushed by Trump to gain five GOP seats in Congress in 2026

The operation in the country’s third-largest city is expected to last about 30 days and could start as early as Sept. 5, a Department of Homeland Security official told The Associated Press on Friday. Another U.S. official said the timing for what could be a sustained immigration enforcement effort resembling this summer’s operations in Los Angeles is awaiting final approval.

Both officials spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss plans that had not been made public.

Chicago is home to a large immigrant population, and both the city and the state of Illinois have some of the country’s strongest rules against cooperating with federal government immigration enforcement efforts. That has often put the city and the state at odds with Trump’s administration as it tries to carry out his mass deportation agenda.

The Trump administration asked the military this week for use of the Naval Station Great Lakes, north of Chicago, to support immigration enforcement.

U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Customs and Border Protection and other federal agencies would take part in the planned Chicago operation, according to the federal officials who spoke to The Associated Press. Unlike the recent federal takeover of policing in Washington, it’s is not expected to rely on the National Guard or military and is focused exclusively on immigration instead of being cast as part of a broad campaign against crime.

The Republican administration is likely to face resistance to any operation from the region’s top Democratic officials, as it has in California from Gov. Gavin Newsom and Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass. Illinois Gov. JB Pritzker, like Newsom, has been trading barbs with Trump and his allies.

A person checks a cell phone while waiting to talk to representatives during an ICE, Immigration and Customs Enforcement, hiring fair Tuesday, Aug. 26, 2025, in Arlington, Texas. (AP Photo/Julio Cortez)

Pritzker said this week that Chicago doesn’t want military intervention to fight crime. On Friday, the Democrat noted that ICE is a civilian law enforcement agency and can legally operate in the city, “but we don’t appreciate when they mistreat our residents, many of whom have been here for decades.”

“We now have a president and a federal government that’s going after them, hunting people down and disappearing them off the streets,” Pritzker said after a school visit in the city’s south suburbs. “Men with masks are grabbing people off the streets and taking them away. That’s just shameful.”

The Department of Homeland Security said this week that it has made 5,000 immigration arrests in the Los Angeles area since launching a sustained crackdown in the nation’s second-largest metropolitan area June 6. Authorities are undeterred by a temporary court order prohibiting racial profiling in Los Angeles, which the administration has challenged before the Supreme Court.

“Make no mistake: If you are here illegally, we will find you, arrest you and send you back. This is just the beginning,” Secretary Kristi Noem said when announcing the arrest milestone in Los Angeles.

The Los Angeles operation has been marked by large, lightning-quick shows of force by heavily armed, masked agents in unmarked cars and civilian dress, often at Home Depots and car washes. The Mexican Consulate in Los Angeles said this week that 15% of Mexican citizens arrested so far work in construction followed by car washes at 13%, based on hundreds of interviews it has conducted.

Spagat reported from San Diego. Associated Press writer John O’Connor contributed from Springfield, Ill.

New Texas Maps Start Game of Political Musical Chairs

posted in: All news | 0

After two weeks spent outside state lines—marked by a surge of national media attention and, then, a struggle to keep their fight in the limelight—Texas House Democrats ended their quorum break as abruptly as a second special session began. Within a few days, the Republicans’ scheme to engineer a rare mid-decade redistricting of the state’s congressional maps had been rammed through the Texas House and Senate. 

What began as a demand from on high (i.e. the Trump administration) and sparked a national partisan gerrymandering arms race, has become the new political reality now that Governor Greg Abbott signed House Bill 4 into law on Friday. 

Democrats knew there was nothing they really could do to stop passage of the new maps upon their return, and they thus claimed their walkout to be victorious because it had successfully spurred Texas’ rival mega-blue state, California, to advance a new map of its own that would nuke its already-marginal number of Republican seats. 

In essence, Republicans’ new congressional maps revert to the strategy that reigned in the 2010s. Texas’ blue urban cores in Houston, San Antonio, Austin, Dallas, and Fort Worth were sliced and diced into a handful of uber-blue seats while the rest were annexed into Republican strongholds in the rural hinterlands. The power of liberal voters and predominantly Black and Latino communities was diluted while conservative, largely white voters’ power was maximized. The new maps also have the GOP making a risky bet that significant gains that Trump enjoyed among Latino voters in 2024, especially along the U.S.-Mexico border, were more than a flash in the pan. 

These changes have overhauled the electoral playing field in Texas for the 2026 midterms and could deliver the GOP as many as five additional seats in the U.S. House of Representatives and provide enough political cushion for the party to maintain control of the chamber and shield Donald Trump’s administration from electoral accountability and Democratic-led oversight. 

In doing so, the new maps have also thrown some chaos and opportunity into  both parties. Ambitious Republican pols now have a handful of additional seats to compete for, and Democratic pols have fewer seats to fight over. With redistricting inevitably comes bitter and contested intra-party disputes between various incumbents and would-be elected officials. 

We’ve already seen some abbreviated political drama play out between the two Texas congressmen from the capital city—longtime liberal institution Lloyd Doggett and up-and-coming progressive Greg Casar. 

Doggett’s 30-year career in the U.S. House is a testament to his survival of multiple attempts by Republicans to draw him out of power by expanding his district all the way down to the Rio Grande Valley and San Antonio. In 2021, the GOP finally ceded Austin by creating a new uber-blue seat, the 37th Congressional District, which Doggett ran for and won in 2022. Then-City Councilman Casar ran for and won Doggett’s old seat, the 35th, which stretched from East Austin down to San Antonio. Then, Republicans decided to carve up Travis County once again. In doing so, they excised the 35th from Austin and reassembled it as a Trump-y district that features part of Bexar County and three neighboring deep-red counties. 

Foreseeing a likely primary showdown, Doggett went on the offensive earlier this month with a preemptive call for Casar to commit to running for reelection in the 35th, insisting that Casar as the (nominal) incumbent in a Hispanic-majority district would be the strongest candidate. Doggett’s self-serving argument did not go well for the 78-year-old—even among his allies, who said it was time for him to step aside for a new generation. On the eve of the passage of redistricting last week, Doggett announced that he would not be seeking reelection under the new map, clearing the way for Casar in the 37th. 

Such redistricting spats do not generally end so smoothly. And more could be on the horizon. 

Houston’s longtime Democratic Congressman Al Green, an outspoken Trump opponent, was drawn out of the predominantly Black 9th Congressional District that he’s represented since 2005, and the 9th itself was turned into a strong Trump-aligned seat in suburban and exurban Houston. Much of the old 9th was moved into the reconstituted 18th Congressional District, another historically Black seat that’s been held by the likes of Barbara Jordan, Mickey Leland, and Sheila Jackson Lee. Ex-Houston Mayor Sylvester Turner was elected to fill the seat after Jackson Lee passed away last year, but he only served three months before passing away himself in March.  

Governor Greg Abbott intentionally left that seat vacant,refusing to call a special election until this November in order to deprive Democrats of a member in Washington and, in hindsight, to gain some leverage in the redrawing of Texas’ congressional map. 

Now, Green has announced that he’s considering running to represent the 18th for a full term in 2026 but will not run in the special election this fall because that would require him stepping down from his current seat. Green, who is 77, would immediately be the clear frontrunner for the seat, though his running could mean preventing the next generation of Houston pols, like Harris County Attorney Christian Menefee or former City Councilwoman Amanda Edwards (both of whom are running in the special), from taking the step up. 

There could be some other potential headaches in Dallas, where Jasmine Crockett was drawn out of the 30th Congressional District—a historically Black seat that was previously long-held by Eddie Bernice Johnson. There is no requirement that members of Congress reside in the districts they represent (though it makes for easy fodder for attacks from political rivals), but the changes have caused Crockett to publicly consider her future options—including a potential statewide run. 

Meanwhile, the 33rd Congressional District, which has historically been based primarily in Fort Worth is getting blown up and has been entirely excised from Tarrant County. It’s now a Dallas-only district. That leaves Fort Worth Congressman Marc Veasey, who’s represented the 33rd since 2013, in a potentially tricky situation. While he’s far from an unknown entity in the Big D, Veasey could be vulnerable to a primary challenge from someone with a political base in Dallas. That could include first-term Congresswoman Julie Johnson, who just recently won the 32nd Congressional District in the Dallas metro in 2024 (a seat that Colin Allred first flipped back in 2018), or some other ambitious Dallas state legislator. Republicans also blew up the 32nd and made it back into a solid red seat by turning it into a chicken finger-like district that extends from Dallas deep into East Texas. 

Meanwhile, the newly created suite of freshly reddened congressional districts sparked a frantic game of political musical chairs with Republicans rushing to declare their candidacy for the various seats.

That includes right-wing state Representative Briscoe Cain, who launched his campaign for the new 9th outside Houston last Thursday—less than 24 hours after the maps passed the Texas House. Others vying for that seat include ex-Harris County judge candidate Alexandra del Moral Mealer, and per the rumor mill, disgraced ex-tea party Congressman Steve Stockman, who was convicted of felony money laundering back in 2018. Former (ever so briefly) Congresswoman Mayra Flores has also abandoned her announced bid to run against Laredo Democrat Henry Cuellar and is instead going back for another shot at a reddened 34th Congressional District in the Rio Grande Valley (currently held by Democrat  Vicente Gonzalez). So too is the brother of state Senator Adam Hinojosa, who flipped a geographically similar state Senate seat in 2024. State Representative John Lujan, who won a San Antonio swing seat in 2024, has also declared for the new 35th in what will also surely be a crowded GOP primary. 

With the maps passed, the music has stopped. And the rush for an open seat begins. 

The post New Texas Maps Start Game of Political Musical Chairs appeared first on The Texas Observer.