Gophers recruit Charlie Jilek flips commitment to Texas

posted in: All news | 0

Michigan prep prospect Charlie Jilek is on the move again.

After flipping from Central Florida to the Gophers on Oct. 1, the three-star recruit from Portage, Mich., has moved on from Minnesota in favor of Texas on Thursday.

Jilek was committed to UCF as a tight end, then Minnesota as a linebacker and now Texas as a tight end.

Jilek told the Pioneer Press in October that he felt felt like he was” a stronger player on the defensive side of the ball” and that having an offer to “play in the Big Ten was awesome.”

The exit of the 6-foot-5, 240-pound player puts Minnesota at 30 total pledges for its 2026 class. Minnesota has two linebackers committed: Hudson Dunn of Peoria, Ariz., and Angel Luciano of Steelton, Pa.

Related Articles


Gophers football at Oregon: Keys to game, how to watch, who has edge


How Gophers quarterback Drake Lindsey is becoming clutch


Gophers add big JUCO receiver Derrick Salley Jr.


Gophers add stout JUCO defensive tackle KJ Henson


Gophers add coveted JUCO safety MJ Graham

Bye Bye Bitcoin? St. Paul City Council discusses banning crypto ATMs

posted in: All news | 0

Goodbye, Bitcoin? There currently are at least 32 crypto kiosks, according to St. Paul police, where users can deposit cash and see it converted into a digital alternative.

Soon, there may be none.

Alarmed by fraud cases that have cost victims millions of dollars nationally, the St. Paul City Council is poised to ban virtual currency kiosks that have proliferated citywide.

The ATM-like kiosks are placed in high-traffic areas such as convenience stores and allow users to make cash deposits, which are then converted into Bitcoin or other digital currencies and transferred into an account or virtual wallet. Digital currency is money that exists only in an electronic form and can be exchanged online. It often operates independently of central banks.

City ordinance

An ordinance before the city council calls for prohibiting any person from operating a virtual currency kiosk within city limits. It would not affect online virtual transactions conducted by businesses and residents.

Michael Carter, an enforcement audit director with the Minnesota Department of Commerce, told the council Wednesday that there have been 51 law enforcement reports statewide involving $700,000 lost to various kiosk scams. The real numbers likely are larger as many victims are too embarrassed to come forward.

Gordon Wrobel, a resident of St. Paul and an AARP volunteer, said the crypto kiosks need more regulations and oversight.

“The impact of fraud on victims and their families is wide reaching and can have an impact financially and emotionally,” said Wrobel, during a public hearing Wednesday. “Criminals are becoming more sophisticated in their approach which authorities struggle to keep up.”

However, Ethan McClelland, the director of government relations for Bitcoin Depot – a leading Bitcoin machine operator – called the proposed ordinance an overreaction. The company sued the city of Stillwater after it banned cryptocurrency machines earlier this year.

“We share the council’s goal of protecting consumers from fraud,” McClelland said. “However, placing a reactionary ban on the industry that is already licensed and regulated by the state, which serves a legitimate purpose for St. Paul residents, is unnecessary and will deprive many customers their only way of participating in the digital economy.”

Crypto scams

Law enforcement investigators have called crypto scams especially dangerous because there is no centralized authority to flag suspicious behavior, and they are often untraceable.

In 2023, Americans reported losing $5.6 billion in cryptocurrency scams, according to the FBI, which found that the frauds were more likely to target older people.

Often, residents unfamiliar with cryptocurrency are warned by fraudsters that they owe the Internal Revenue Service or another federal agency back payments, and they’re pressured to use a kiosk to deposit cash to a serial number within a matter of hours, or they’ll be prosecuted, they’re told.

The Minnesota Legislature implemented a degree of cryptocurrency fraud protection in 2024. A new law required all kiosks to disclose terms and conditions, issue refunds for new customers, and set a maximum transaction limit of $2,000 for new customers.

Tim Greenfield, the city council’s chief policy officer, said the state’s measures haven’t been effective in stopping scams, and fraudsters have quickly found ways around the regulations.

“These kiosks serve as a very specific flashpoint for which criminal activity defrauds citizens and no amount of disclosure or tapping of a screen or a receipt can be as effective as  simply removing them from operation,” Greenfield said.

Tim Plunkett, a St. Paul resident, said he fell victim to a scam in February. Scammers impersonated Xfinity technicians and told him abnormally high activity on his desktop had led them to find evidence of money laundering and other illegal acts. The scammers told Plunkett that they would report the activity to the Federal Trade Commission unless he transferred them money through a cryptocurrency kiosk.

Plunkett went to different kiosks four times. When he received an email from Rocket Coin, a cryptocurrency ATM company, he realized he had been scammed. It turned out that the scammers had locked him out of his computer and his bank account.

“The first thing they want you to do is to get you in a state of confusion,” he told the council.​

Raising public awareness

Council President Rebecca Noecker said the proposed kiosk ban is a way to protect the vulnerable.

“Part of this is we want to raise public awareness of the level of these scams for older members, low-income folks and the incarcerated and their families in our community,” Noecker said.​

Crypto scams have become lucrative crimes in recent years. In September, two men stole $8 million in cryptocurrency after kidnapping a father and his nine-year-old son in Washington County.

Related Articles


St. Paul offering $2,500 for those facing eviction. Here’s how it works.


Lawsuit filed after St. Paul City Council unanimously approves firearms regulation ordinance


Process over $250,000 reparations study splits St. Paul’s Black leaders


St. Paul mayor’s race: What voters say about Kaohly Her’s victory


St. Paul: Why do some streetlights remain out on Shepard Road, elsewhere?

​In June, an Eagan couple was almost scammed out of $125,000. The couple was able to avoid losing all of their money when Gabby Conklin, an office assistant in the city attorney’s office who had stopped at a convenience store for gas, intervened, Noecker said.

A scammer was trying to get the couple to deposit money into a kiosk by pretending to be an FTC agent.

“The elderly couple were literally one press of a button away from losing their life savings irreversibly, but through Gabby’s work that was averted,” Noecker said.

The council will host a final vote on the proposed ordinance on Nov. 19.

St. Paul police looking for hit-and-run driver in deadly pedestrian crash

posted in: All news | 0

Police were looking Thursday for a hit-and-run driver who fatally struck a pedestrian in St. Paul.

Officers responded to St. Anthony Avenue and Aldine Street, near Interstate 94 and University Avenue, about 5:15 p.m. on reports of a crash.

The pedestrian was found with head trauma, and officers began rendering aid until St. Paul Fire Department medics took over, said Nikki Muehlhausen, a St. Paul police spokesperson. Medics took the woman to Regions Hospital, where she was pronounced dead a short time later.

Witnesses reported the vehicle that struck the woman was a dark-colored sport-utility vehicle. Additional information wasn’t immediately available.

“There is an active search underway for the driver/vehicle, which fled the scene before officers arrived,” Muehlhausen said Thursday night.

Related Articles


Maplewood man, 56, admits in court to 2014 kidnapping and rape attempt


Man fatally shot after Clearwater County authorities say he discharged flare at officers


A judge said Luigi Mangione could have a laptop to view evidence in jail. He still hasn’t gotten it


What’s next in Congress on the push to release the Epstein files


Takeaways from the newly released Epstein documents

Cash App’s Moneybot might know your spending habits better than you do

posted in: All news | 0

By KEN SWEET

NEW YORK (AP) — Imagine if your bank could move money for you with only the slightest of digital nods for your approval. Or that could tell you that you’re overspending but more importantly know how to address that overspending and put you on better financial footing.

Related Articles


Google accused in suit of using Gemini AI tool to snoop on users


IRS boosts contribution limits for 401(k) retirement plan savers


Doritos and Cheetos dial back the bright orange in new versions without artificial ingredients


AT&T reached a $177M data breach settlement. What consumers should know about claiming their money


Airlines are optimistic about a quick recovery ahead of Thanksgiving once FAA ends flight cuts

That’s what you’ll get with Moneybot, a new financial services chatbot shown off this week by Cash App that will be slowly introduced into its banking app this winter. Unlike existing bank chatbots, which can handle routine tasks like changing an address, Moneybot can take advanced actions for a customer like creating a savings plan, buying or selling stock, or even evaluating a customer’s spending habits.

Moneybot is part of the next generation of chatbots using what the tech industry calls “agentic” AI, which turns tools like ChatGPT into an “AI agent” that can take action online on a person’s behalf. That means, instead of just writing text, answering questions or recommending products found online, an “agentic” chatbot could also buy a product.

Amazon now has Rufus to go with Alexa, which both either provide information on products or can buy things on customers’ behalf. Walmart is rolling out “Chat & Buy” and Microsoft has Copilot Shopping.

Agentic AI, for being so new, is already causing some controversy. Amazon is suing an AI chatbot company, Perplexity, for alleged computer fraud over AI shopping agents that Amazon says are disguising themselves as human buyers to access customer accounts without Amazon’s permission. Perplexity has denied the claims.

Traditional banks have had chatbots for a while, notably Bank of America’s “Erica” or “Ask Amex” from American Express, but have hesitated to roll out agentic AI. They worry about possible liability if a chatbot buys a product by mistake for a customer or is maliciously used to buy things it is not supposed to.

“Our top priority is to keep our customers’ and clients’ data safe above all else,” said Mark Birkhead, chief data officer at JPMorgan Chase, in an interview with the consulting firm McKinsey back in June on the issue of why the bank hasn’t rolled out agentic AI yet to customers.

Cash App on the other hand is diving in head first.

One notable feature of Moneybot is its prompts and suggestions. When Moneybot launches, it does an analysis of the the customer’s transactions and spending and gives them independent recommendations on actions they could take. Unlike other bank chatbots, which take you to other parts of a banks’ website, Moneybot’s transactions and analysis happen inside a single screen. Cash App’s executives see Moneybot becoming the primary way people interact with CashApp in the future.

Want to know your biggest spending categories instantly and how to cut your spending? Moneybot gives several suggestions in a matter of seconds, showing you the merchants you spent with. Need to save $1,000 toward a vacation in six months? Moneybot creates an automated savings plan for you with only a couple of prompts.

Want to put money into the stock market? It takes only a request and confirmation in Moneybot, which will buy Tesla stock for you or even bitcoin. Moneybot will remind you, however, that it does not give investing advice.

Moneybot may even anticipate why the customer is opening up the app in the first place.

“We have such a deep understanding of who you are that it’s almost a failure if we have to rely on customers to ask right questions,” said Owen Jennings, executive officer and business lead at Block, in an interview.

Company officials pointed out that, despite having these agent abilities, Moneybot will still need active confirmation from the user to do its money-moving tasks. But that confirmation is often just a simple push of a button or a “yes” in a chat box.

Cash App executives say Moneybot uses three different AI models, choosing the most appropriate one for the customer’s question. Some are easier to recognize, including the eager-to-please tone that often comes with ChatGPT 5.

A Cash App employee demo’ing Moneybot, much to his chagrin, showed that he spent heavily at Nordstrom last month. Moneybot kindly suggested he might want to cut back on his clothing purchases if he needs to save money.

There are things Moneybot cannot do because of the legal and privacy questions that have yet to be answered. Moneybot won’t offer you a loan but feels like it could do so if the toggle were ever turned on.

Because of the way the prompts are written, Cash App employees acknowledged there could be privacy and legal implications with what Moneybot suggests if appropriate guardrails are not put into place.

Policymakers have raised concerns about how these chatbots could steer customers into one product or another, even if one product may not be in the best interest for the customer. For instance, what’s to stop a future version of Moneybot from favoring a buy now, pay later loan from AfterPay — also owned by Cash App’s parent company Block — for purchases instead of Affirm or Klarna?

“If firms cannot manage using a new technology in a lawful way, then they should not use the technology,” said Rohit Chopra in 2024, when he was director of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau. Chopra spent much of his tenure at the bureau raising concerns about the adoption of AI in financial services.

In the meantime, asking for a loan inside Moneybot will transfer a customer to a human agent.

Not surprisingly, Moneybot has the usual disclosure found at the bottom of most chatbots these days: Artificial intelligence can make mistakes. Somehow, that feels a bit more important in banking than an AI chatbot accidentally providing the wrong amount of cumin in a fajita recipe or buying the wrong size of shirt.

An earlier version of this story misspelled Moneybot.