Macron appoints Defense Minister Lecornu as France’s latest prime minister

posted in: All news | 0

PARIS (AP) — French President Emmanuel Macron late Tuesday appointed Defense Minister Sébastien Lecornu as France’s new prime minister, the country’s fourth in about a year.

Lecornu, 39, is the youngest defense minister in French history and architect of a major military buildup through 2030, spurred by Russia’s war in Ukraine.

Related Articles


Top EU official von der Leyen to outline plans for dealing with Europe’s challenges in major speech


World Athletics says 95% of female athletes have completed sex testing ahead of world championships


Brazil’s Supreme Court nears a verdict in coup plot trial of former President Jair Bolsonaro


Israeli strike targets Hamas leaders in Qatar as they weigh Gaza ceasefire proposal


US tech companies enabled the surveillance and detention of hundreds of thousands in China

A former conservative who joined Macron’s centrist movement in 2017, he has held posts in local governments, overseas territories and during Macron’s yellow vest “great debate,” where he helped manage mass anger with dialogue. He also offered talks on autonomy during unrest in Guadeloupe in 2021.

His rise reflects Macron’s instinct to reward loyalty, but also the need for continuity as repeated budget showdowns have toppled his predecessors and left France in drift.

Legislators toppled Lecornu’s predecessor Francois Bayrou and his government in a confidence vote on Monday, a new crisis for Europe’s second-largest economy.

Bayrou gambled that lawmakers would back his view that France must slash public spending to rein in its huge debts. Instead, they seized on the vote to gang up against the 74-year-old centrist who was appointed by Macron last December.

The demise of Bayrou’s short-lived minority government heralds renewed uncertainty and a risk of prolonged legislative deadlock for France as it wrestles with pressing challenges, including budget difficulties and, internationally, wars in Ukraine and Gaza and the shifting priorities of U.S. President Donald Trump.

Georgia judge to toss landmark racketeering charges against ‘Cop City’ protesters

posted in: All news | 0

By R.J. RICO, Associated Press

ATLANTA (AP) — A Georgia judge on Tuesday said he will toss the racketeering charges against all 61 defendants accused of a yearslong conspiracy to halt the construction of a police and firefighter training facility that critics pejoratively call “Cop City.”

Fulton County Judge Kevin Farmer said he does not believe Republican Attorney General Chris Carr had the authority to secure the 2023 indictments under Georgia’s Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations law, or RICO. Experts believe it was the largest criminal racketeering case ever filed against protesters in U.S. history.

Farmer said during a hearing that Carr needed Gov. Brian Kemp ‘s permission to pursue the case instead of the local district attorney. Prosecutors earlier conceded to the judge that they did not obtain any such order.

“It would have been real easy to just ask the governor, ‘Let me do this, give me a letter,’” Farmer said. “The steps just weren’t followed.”

Five of the 61 defendants were also indicted on charges of domestic terrorism and first-degree arson. Farmer said Carr also didn’t have the authority to pursue the arson charge, though he believes the domestic terrorism charge can stand.

Farmer said he plans to file a formal order soon and is not sure whether he would quash the entire indictment or let the domestic terrorism charge stand, though he said he expects the prosecution to appeal regardless.

Deputy Attorney General John Fowler told Farmer that he believes the judge’s decision is “wholly incorrect.”

The long-brewing controversy over the training center erupted in January 2023 after state troopers who were part of a sweep of the South River Forest that killed an activist who authorities said had fired at them. Numerous protests ensued, with masked vandals sometimes attacking police vehicles and construction equipment to stall the project and intimidate contractors into backing out.

The defendants faced a wide variety of allegations — everything from throwing Molotov cocktails at police officers, to supplying food to protesters who were camped in the woods and passing out fliers against a state trooper who had fatally shot the protester known as “Tortuguita.” Each defendant faced up to 20 years in prison on the RICO charge.

Carr, who is running for governor, had pursued the case, with Kemp hailing it as an important step to combat “out-of-state radicals that threaten the safety of our citizens and law enforcement.”

But critics had decried the indictment as a politically motivated, heavy-handed attempt to quash the movement.

Related Articles


US household income rose slightly last year, roughly matching 2019 level


Most US adults think individual choices keep people in poverty, new poll finds


AP analysis: Presidents are taking longer to approve disaster aid. For some, the wait is agonizing


New data shows the US job market was much weaker than thought in 2024, and this year as well


Wall Street holds near its records following the latest report showing the US job market is slowing

Emerging in the wake of the 2020 racial justice protests, the “Stop Cop City” movement gained nationwide recognition as it united anarchists, environmental activists and anti-police protesters against the sprawling training center, which was being built in a wooded area that was ultimately razed in DeKalb County.

Activists argued that uprooting acres of trees for the facility would exacerbate environmental damage in a flood-prone, majority-Black area while serving as an expensive staging ground for militarized officers to be trained in quelling social movements.

The training center, a priority of Atlanta Mayor Andre Dickens, opened earlier this year, despite years of protests and millions in cost overruns, some of which was due to the damage protesters caused, and police officials’ needs to bolster 24/7 security around the facility.

But over the past two years, the case had been bogged down in procedural issues, with none of the defendants going to trial. Farmer and the case’s previous judge, Fulton County Judge Kimberly Esmond Adams, had earlier been critical of prosecutors’ approach to the case, with Adams saying the prosecution had committed “gross negligence” by allowing privileged attorney-client emails to be included among a giant cache of evidence that was shared between investigators and dozens of defense attorneys.

Prosecutors had repeatedly apologized for the delays and missteps, but lamented the difficulty of handling such a sprawling case, though Farmer pointed out that it was prosecutors who decided to bring this “61-person elephant” to court in the first place.

Black McDonald’s operators detail history of alleged racial discrimination in lawsuit

posted in: All news | 0

For 25 years, Robert Bonner was committed to working under McDonald’s iconic Golden Arches. But by the time the native Floridian had severed ties with the franchise founded in Des Plaines by Ray Kroc in 1955, he burned everything that was related to the restaurant chain — awards, shirts, valuable collectibles — in his backyard.

Bonner was the owner-operator of six McDonald’s stores in Illinois and the St. Louis region. But he left the chain after enduring numerous alleged racist actions from McDonald’s that he says impeded his opportunity for entrepreneurial growth and generational wealth.

“Those Golden Arches … you have the belief that at some point this is going to go the way you were promised it would go,” he said. “The day you get the keys, it becomes an us and them mentality, corporate versus the people who run the store.”

Bonner is among dozens of Black McDonald’s store owners around the nation demanding a jury trial in a racial discrimination and breach of contract lawsuit against McDonald’s Corp. and McDonald’s USA, LLC. This June, Bonner was among more than 40 plaintiffs who called for a boycott of the franchise. The Chicago-based civil rights law firm of Loevy + Loevy filed the federal suit in 2023, stating Black owner and operators were forced out of the company over internal practices and policies that include, among others, forcing Black owners into low-profit stores in areas with high crime rates and denying Black franchisees the ability to buy stores in white communities.

Bonner endured the alleged racist tactics from McDonald’s after becoming an owner-operator in 1990 with an East St. Louis location. Despite recognition for his leadership in the local communities where he operated for over two decades — including investing nearly $1 million into community programs — Bonner severed ties with McDonald’s in 2013.

According to the lawsuit, McDonald’s thwarted Bonner’s attempts to sell his stores at a worthy price and buy new locations on multiple occasions between 2005 and 2013. One such deal was approximately $800,000 for a store, but when the regional manager spoke to the potential buyer, he revealed he planned to buy Bonner’s store for much less, saying “I’ll be damned if I let a Black operator be much richer than me.”

Bonner said he had to sell the store for around 25% less than the deal he had lined up. Bonner even had plans to purchase McDonald’s stores in other states, but the same regional manager got in the way of that potential deal and encouraged the seller not to sell to Bonner.

“They didn’t want to see people of color pass them … we heard that so many times,” Bonner said. “McDonald’s did change my life, but they took so much in so many years. I won’t even go into one of the stores now.”

The lawsuit details the history of racial discrimination against Black franchisees — from its founding in 1955, when McDonald’s installed its restaurants only in white neighborhoods and barred Black individuals from becoming franchisees, to McDonald’s approving Black owner-operators to take over urban stores solely in scenarios where Black franchisees had to partner with a white owner-operator to purchase a location in the 1960s and ’70s. From 1998 to 2020, the number of Black franchisees fell from 377 to 186, while the number of total McDonald’s stores went from 15,086 to 38,999. Stores owned by Black franchisees earn about two-thirds of the average McDonald’s store.

The suit says equitable measures and initiatives to rectify the racial discrimination in the company were never followed through on, increasing the annual cash flow gap between Black and non-Black franchisees. Roughly half of Black franchisees were forced out of the McDonald’s system by 2020, compared with 10% of white owner-operators in the same time frame. Then, in January 2025, McDonald’s announced it was scaling back its commitment to diversity initiatives, which prompted the boycott by the People’s Union USA.

A statement from McDonald’s Corp. denied the allegations in the lawsuit and defended its history with Black franchisees, saying plaintiffs’ allegations are false, a deliberate distortion of facts and a desperate publicity stunt by the lawyers that stand to benefit. “The claims were previously dismissed, and make no sense given McDonald’s record of investment in its franchisees’ success. We look forward to the day these plaintiffs set aside their falsehoods and acknowledge McDonald’s steadfast commitment to the success of our Black franchisees and increasing access to opportunity for all.”

Loevy + Loevy attorney Quinn Rallins said most of the effort to sue in response to McDonald’s practices came about when two former Black vice presidents at McDonald’s — Vicki Guster-Hines and Domineca Neal — blew the whistle. That is when nearly 77 clients in total, approximately 40 he represents, “decided enough was enough,” he said.

The late Sherman Claypool invested in McDonald’s in 1971 and would go on to own five locations in Milwaukee. He was one of the founding members of the National Black McDonald’s Operators Association to advocate for Black franchisees — his work with the association was recognized in a May 2022 resolution passed by the Illinois House of Representatives for laying the foundation for “African American entrepreneurs in the United States today.” Claypool died in October 2020 from stress-induced Parkinson’s, according to his daughter Talyia. From downstate Grand Chain, Illinois, Claypool was a mechanic. He owned two service stations in Wisconsin before he segued to McDonald’s ownership. His widow, Glenda, a native of Milwaukee, is part of the lawsuit on behalf of her late husband.

“I remember he came home one day, he sat outside in the car, and he was like, ‘I can’t do it no more. I can’t do this anymore,’” recalled Glenda Claypool.

According to Talyia Claypool, before the family sold their properties in 2014, she and her sister, Mila, who had worked with her father in their stores since 2010, watched their dad suffer for a decade due to the alleged discrimination McDonald’s posed on his business. They said he was sick for that time, and given the stress, his condition progressively got worse over the last three years he owned the franchise. Sherman Claypool had managed to hang on to the business for 45 years.

“The last announced visit that we had (from corporate), he had a medical episode that morning, and he never had that … that was a routine thing for him, but it had gotten so bad at the end that he had to be seen by a medic before he went to work,” Mila Claypool said. She felt so traumatized by the McDonald’s experience that she left fast-food altogether. She said she wants this lawsuit to be taken seriously, in order to feel heard, seen and, to some extent, get the healing started.

“There were forcible price increases, and the neighborhoods that we were in were in low-income neighborhoods, and it wouldn’t be affordable to the community or to our customers,” Mila Claypool said.

Talyia Claypool remembers McDonald’s forcing her family down to one store, she said. A complete revamp of the computer system in their last store was the one thing the family couldn’t come back from.

“Finances had gotten so bad that we were robbing Peter to pay Paul at one point,” Talyia Claypool said. “We own a store and our lights are cut off, not because we mismanaged money. It’s that we can’t make any because (they) are taking more than we could survive on. There were some good years, but there was a lot of bad. We felt that they tried to hurt us,” she said.

Sherman Claypool faced a series of security issues at his stores with employees frequently being robbed. According to the lawsuit, around 2014 a reckless driver drove into Claypool’s store, which suspended operations for weeks, and another incident prevented customers access to the store for about eight months. Claypool sought financial assistance from McDonald’s for those incidents, but was denied.

When Claypool was offering scholarships to the Black community in Milwaukee from the 1970s to the early 2000s, McDonald’s allegedly forced them to stop the giving. The Claypools said a white McDonald’s field consultant didn’t want to go to that side of town anymore for such events because she was scared, so they think McDonald’s did what they could to stop the scholarship program, despite the hundreds of scholarships Sherman Claypool funded.

“Our experience with McDonald’s is what introduced us to hardcore racism — not where we lived, not the schools we went to,” she said. “If you put us all in a room together, we all have similar stories, and a lot of us don’t even know each other. I was crying going through the stories of the other Black owner-operators. McDonald’s knew what they were doing. They figured out a way to get money off Black people, put some Black faces behind these McDonald’s, and get their money, and at the same token, we’re going to make sure that these people don’t get more than us, don’t get what we have.”

drockett@chicagotribune.com

Top EU official von der Leyen to outline plans for dealing with Europe’s challenges in major speech

posted in: All news | 0

By LORNE COOK

BRUSSELS (AP) — European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen delivers a major state of the union speech on Wednesday addressing the challenges facing the world’s biggest trading bloc and laying out her vision for tackling them.

Related Articles


World Athletics says 95% of female athletes have completed sex testing ahead of world championships


Brazil’s Supreme Court nears a verdict in coup plot trial of former President Jair Bolsonaro


Israeli strike targets Hamas leaders in US-allied Qatar as they weigh Gaza ceasefire proposal


US tech companies enabled the surveillance and detention of hundreds of thousands in China


Israeli military urges full evacuation of Gaza City ahead of expanded military operation

The commission has enthusiastically billed her speech — modeled on the annual State of the Union addresses to Congress by U.S. presidents — as “a milestone event for European democracy.”

During her address, to be delivered to lawmakers during a session that could run for around three hours at the European Parliament in Strasbourg, France, von der Leyen is expected to announce new spending targets and policies for the years ahead. Few details have been released about what she might say.

Fabian Zuleeg, Chief Executive at the European Policy Centre think-tank, said that he expects the speech to be significant and closely watched in Europe.

“A lot has happened over the last year. A lot of things which are more on the negative side rather than on the positive side. So people will be looking at how will she react to that,” he told The Associated Press on Tuesday.

“People want to know not only what are the policy initiatives, but what is the mood, what is the feeling, where Europe is going to go in the next years,” he said.

An increasingly powerful EU executive

The commission is the European Union’s executive arm. It proposes laws that impact the lives of around 450 million people across 27 countries, and monitors whether those rules are respected.

Under von der Leyen’s stewardship, the commission has pushed hard in trade talks with the United States to try to secure favorable terms and limit the economic damage inflicted by President Donald Trump’s global tariff war.

Her department has driven efforts to support Ukraine – now in the fourth year of a war seen as an existential threat to Europe – and to help the EU arm itself against an aggressive Russia whose president shows little interest in peace talks.

The commission is also Europe’s top antitrust regulator and has angered tech companies — and Trump — by imposing massive fines on firms over competition concerns. Last week, it slapped a $3.5 billion fine on Google for breaching the rules.

“Very unfair, and the American Taxpayer will not stand for it!” Trump said in a post on his Truth Social on Friday. “As I have said before, my Administration will NOT allow these discriminatory actions to stand.”

At the same time, Trump has heaped praised on von der Leyen, and the 66-year-old former German defense minister has become a regular feature at summits with leaders around the world, despite her role as a political appointee not elected to office.

The commission has gained power as the strength of governments in Europe’s traditional driving forces France and Germany have waned. Her speech in Strasbourg takes place just two days after yet another French government fell.

Criticism likely after a no confidence vote

But the EU’s most influential official is also likely to hear fresh criticism from lawmakers, two months after surviving a rare no confidence vote against a commission president in the parliament.

A nebulous mix of claims were raised against her, including over her private text messaging with the chief executive of vaccine maker Pfizer during the COVID-19 pandemic, and allegations of misuse of EU funds and election interference.

She won comfortably but didn’t turn up for the vote. Taking to social media, von der Leyen posted: “As external forces seek to destabilize and divide us, it is our duty to respond in line with our values. Thank you, and long live Europe.”

On the eve of her speech, European public interest groups and trade unions criticized her over plans for “an unprecedented wave of drastic cuts to regulations protecting labor, social, and human rights, as well as digital rights, and the environment.”

They claim the commission is rolling back protections under the guise of cutting bureaucratic red tape.

Mark Carlson in Brussels contributed.