Texas Can’t Keep Up with Surge in Workers’ Wage Theft Complaints 

posted in: All news | 0

Texas workers have long struggled with wage theft by their employers—and the state’s willingness and ability to crack down on scofflaw employers has been relatively minimal. Now, rates of suspected wage theft are increasing, and the state labor law enforcement system is straining to keep up. 

Last year, state investigators faced the highest number of paycheck complaints in nine years and a prior internal audit noted that it typically took months just for complaints to be assigned to an investigator.

“The current system is failing workers in that it’s too slow, especially with many Texans living paycheck to paycheck,” said Sean Goldhammer, director of employment and legal services at the Workers Defense Project, a statewide member-led group that advocates for immigrant workers.

It’s already hard enough for working-class Texans to survive with their full paychecks; 42 percent of Texas households face financial instability. The state still follows the federal minimum wage, which has remained at $7.25 an hour since 2009, and housing in the state has become less affordable

Meanwhile, the rate of wage theft complaints has soared in recent years, and the state agency responsible for policing labor laws has been unable to keep up. In the 2024 fiscal year, more than 15,000 complaints were filed with the Texas Workforce Commission (TWC), which is charged with enforcing state and federal labor law. That’s the highest amount since at least 2016 and double the amount from 2021, according to agency reports. Of the 12,400 cases investigated that year, the state ordered employers to pay back more than $10 million in wages.

Wage theft comes in the form of anything from missing paychecks, commissions, bonuses, or other owed wages under the state payday law to overtime manipulation and misclassification as an independent contractor. TWC may not investigate every complaint if it’s submitted past the 6-month deadline, without sufficient evidence, or involves a bankrupt employer. 

As the number of cases grew, so has the backlog of unresolved complaints, according to an internal TWC audit that the Texas Observer obtained through a public records request. Once investigators are assigned a case, the department goal in 2023 was to finish in 21 days—they achieved a 10-day average. Although they were fast at processing claims, the increasing number of cases started piling up and it took longer for them to even be assigned to investigators. This caused them to fall short of their second internal goal, which is to have a case complete within 90 days after the case is first submitted—their 2023 average was 103 days. 

“It’s difficult to do this work day in and day out, especially when you have way too much work on your plate,” said Jenn Round, a Rutgers University researcher at the Workplace Justice Lab, who helps states with their labor law enforcement efforts and formerly led the Seattle Office of Labor Standards.

Despite the challenges faced by state investigators, TWC has recovered millions of dollars for workers over the years. Records show that they collected $7.5 million in the 2024 fiscal year, the highest amount since at least 2016. “To have the capacity and the resources to do impactful investigations, you have to have the people power,” Round said.

The TWC signaled a need for more support last year when they requested an extra $1.2 million for its biennial budget for salary increases to help retain its labor law enforcement staff, citing the growing rate of complaints. TWC had a turnover rate of 14 percent in 2024, the fifth highest of all state agencies that year, according to a state auditor’s report. The agency has also seen a drop in qualified candidates for investigator positions, among others, according to its latest strategic plan.

After the TWC’s three governor-appointed commissioners ranked the request 9th out of 10 on the agency’s priority list, the requested salary funds were ultimately declined by Texas House and Senate appropriators earlier this year. (In 2023, legislators did approve $2.2 million to fund the modernization of the department’s outdated case management system, but implementation is facing delays.) 

The operating budget for the agency’s labor law enforcement activities is set at $4.5 million for the 2026 fiscal year, compared to $3.7 million in 2023. A TWC spokesperson told the Observer they did not have anyone available for an interview, and the agency did not not respond to requests for comment.

The TWC could soon undergo major changes given that the agency is under review by the Texas Sunset Advisory Commission, which typically happens every 12 years with lawmakers deciding if an agency should be reformed or abolished. Public input is now being sought since the agency released its self-evaluation report in August.

For Goldhammer, who has helped workers file complaints, he’d like to see the state fund more investigators to process complaints, an increase in the current 180-day statute of limitations (federal labor law investigations have a two-year statute of limitations), and the creation of an industry funded wage-theft pool that could be used to immediately pay out claims that are in favor of an employee.

Stronger collection capabilities are also needed, advocates say. 

Research by Round and her colleagues found that TWC ordered $99 million in wages ordered due across over 57,000 cases between 2010 and 2020, but 80 percent of those wages had yet to be recovered as of 2024. The TWC told the Dallas Morning News in 2023 that it could not verify Rutgers’ findings since it lacked access to the methodology.

“Collections is a difficult problem. It’s like collecting against any debt. If the money’s not there, the money’s not there,” Round said. TWC’s current enforcement and deterrent tools vary. Penalties of up to $1,000 can be imposed on bad-faith employers, the agency can order the employer’s bank to freeze funds and turn them over, or it can file a lawsuit against the employer. A lien is also attached to an employer’s property after a final determination of owed wages, which could force employers to pay back owed wages if they try to sell the property. There are currently more than 11,000 active liens totaling over $127 million, according to state data.

Other enforcement mechanisms used elsewhere around the country include revoking the food permits from employers that don’t comply with wage orders or stop-work orders that force an employer to close operations if they don’t pay owed wages, Round noted. A few cities—Austin, El Paso, and Houston—have enacted ordinances meant to fight wage theft, but they lacked effective enforcement powers.

Collecting wages is also a problem faced by labor attorneys, such as Joe Buenker, who represents Houston-area workers in federal labor lawsuits. In one case, he said, it took him five years to collect the money off of a lien he had placed on an employer’s property. “If I had collected all the judgments in my career, I’d have my own island,” Buenker told the Observer.

“We’re not getting what we should get out of that business relationship…The person that’s doing it right—paying their worker as an employee, withholding taxes, and having all their people covered by workers’ comp—it’s more expensive to do business the right way, but it benefits society as a whole,” Buenker said.

In parallel to these varying state labor law enforcement systems and the courts, there is also the Wage and Hour Division within the U.S. Department of Labor (DOL), which investigates violations of various federal laws, including those that cover minimum wage and overtime. A recent case involved workers in Travis County who alleged that their wages were stolen while working for contractors building the Tesla Gigafactory.

The number of investigators, however, is dwindling. As of earlier this year, there were just 611 the lowest point in decades nationwide, according to Rutgers University researchers. As of May 2025, there were only 68 federal investigators assigned in Texas—one for every 232,000 workers. A review of federal data shows that the total wages federal investigators ordered to be paid back in Texas is the lowest it’s been in 21 years at $7.5 million in the 2025 fiscal year, compared to tens of millions in prior years.

“No law can enforce itself. You have to have people to enforce it,” Jeff Darby, a former DOL wage investigator in Texas for 33 years until 2023, told the Observer. “And if you don’t, the whole thing is a fraud.”

The post Texas Can’t Keep Up with Surge in Workers’ Wage Theft Complaints  appeared first on The Texas Observer.

Program That Helps New Yorkers Pay Winter Heating Bills Delayed by Federal Shutdown, Gov. Says

posted in: All news | 0

Nearly 1 million New York City households relied on the Low Income Home Energy Assistance Program (LIHEAP) last winter to help afford their heating costs, more than any other region in the state. Applications for this year’s benefits are on hold indefinitely until federal funding resumes, officials said.

The delay comes as household energy costs are rising, advocates say. (Adi Talwar/City Limits)

A program that helps low-income New Yorkers pay for heating in the winter is on hold because of the federal government shutdown, state officials announced Wednesday—at a time when many households are already behind on, or struggling to pay for, their energy bills.

Nearly 1 million New York City households relied on the Low-Income Home Energy Assistance Program (known as LIHEAP, or HEAP) last winter to help afford their energy costs, more than any other region in the state. Applications for this season were supposed to open Nov. 3, but are being delayed for at least a few weeks—or until the federal government reopens and reallocates funding, Gov. Kathy Hochul said Wednesday.

“Thanks to Washington Republicans’ government shutdown, hundreds of thousands of vulnerable New Yorkers are about to be left in the cold,” Hochul said in a statement. “By refusing to open the government and delaying heating assistance funding, Republicans are once again willfully turning their backs on their constituents.”

The federal government has been shutdown since Oct. 1, after Republican and Democratic lawmakers hit an impasse over healthcare spending: Democrats in Congress want to extend subsidies that help residents pay for health services under the Affordable Care Act, to avoid huge hikes in people’s monthly premiums.

Other public programs are also at risk, should the closure continue: funding for the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), or food stamps, is due to run out Nov. 1, meaning more than 3 million New Yorkers could lose the benefits that help them pay for groceries each month.

In a statement Wednesday, a spokesperson for the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, which oversees LIHEAP through its Administration for Children and Families, blamed the “Democrat-led shutdown” for “preventing states from receiving new funds.”

“The Trump Administration is committed to reopening the government for the American people,” HHS Press Secretary Emily G. Hilliard said in an email.

LIHEAP provides both emergency and one-time payments toward utility bills or the cost of fuel delivery. Eligibility is based on household size, income (a single person, for example, must earn below $41,685 a year to qualify), and other factors, like if the household includes someone who is 60 or older, 6 or younger, or permanently disabled. 

Last year, it doled out $287 million in heating assistance across the state, with $54 million of that going to households in the five boroughs.

The program’s delay comes as New Yorkers’ energy costs are going up, and as many already struggle to afford their heating bills.

A report last year from the climate policy think tank Switchbox found that one out of every four New York residents is “energy burdened,” meaning they spend at least 6 percent of their income on utility costs. In the Bronx, 34 percent of households are energy burdened, among the highest of any New York county, the report found.

Statewide, more than 1.2 million households are over 60 days behind on their energy bills, collectively owing nearly $2 billion, according to advocates with AARP and the Public Utility Law Project.

The two groups put out a statement earlier this week imploring Gov. Hochul to fund LIHEAP directly during the shutdown so it can open on time this winter, saying more than 1,800 New York households per day had their energy service disconnected just in August alone.

“Without immediate action, more than a million households could be forced to choose between heat, food, or medicine as temperatures start to drop,” the organizations said in a statement.

Those in need of immediate assistance should check their eligibility for other emergency funds, the advocates said, like New York City’s One Shot Deal or the state’s Energy Affordability Program.

To reach the editor, contact Jeanmarie@citylimits.org. Want to republish this story? Find City Limits’ reprint policy here.

The post Program That Helps New Yorkers Pay Winter Heating Bills Delayed by Federal Shutdown, Gov. Says appeared first on City Limits.

A new car vs. health insurance? Average family job-based coverage hits $27K

posted in: All news | 0

By Phil Galewitz, KFF Health News

With the federal shutdown entering its fourth week, spurred by a stalemate over the cost of health insurance for 22 million Americans on Affordable Care Act plans, a new report shows that over 154 million people with coverage through an employer also face steep price hikes — and that the situation is likely to get worse.

Related Articles


Trump pardons Binance founder Changpeng Zhao


Trump allies, undeterred by setbacks in courts and Congress, push anew for citizenship proof to vote


Trump mulls asking Israel to free Palestinian leader Barghouti as US looks to Gaza’s post-Hamas rule


4 family members of Illinois governor candidate killed in Montana helicopter crash, campaign says


Health care compromise appears far off as the government shutdown stalemate persists

Premiums for job-based health insurance rose 6% in 2025 to an average of $26,993 a year for family coverage, according to an annual survey of employers released Oct. 22 by KFF, a health information nonprofit that includes KFF Health News.

It’s the first time in two decades that the cost of covering a family of four has risen by 6% or more for three consecutive years, data from KFF shows.

Over the last five years, the average premium for family coverage has increased by 26%, compared with a 29% increase in workers’ wages and nearly 24% growth in inflation. The average cost for family coverage is now about the same as a new Toyota Corolla hybrid.

The average annual premium for an individual health plan provided by employers increased by 5% to $9,325 — nearly $3,000 higher than in 2016, according to the survey.

“It’s a concern as health costs just keep going up,” said Eric Trump, controller at Steve Reiff Inc., a small company in South Whitley, Indiana, that specializes in sandblasting and painting heavy equipment.

Trump, who is not related to President Donald Trump, said his company’s health insurance costs rose 8% for the 2026 fiscal year — roughly the same as they have in the last few years.

Workers at Reiff pay about half the cost of their health coverage. About half of its 20 current employees decline the insurance because they get coverage through a family member or choose to go uninsured, he said. “There’s not a lot we can do as we don’t have enough employees to spread out the costs.”

Most people with job-based insurance contribute to the cost of their premiums, with the average worker this year contributing $1,440 for individual coverage or $6,850 for family coverage.

Over time, more workers have paid increasingly higher deductibles, the amount they must spend out-of-pocket on medical services before their insurer pitches in. More than one‑third of covered workers are enrolled in a plan with a deductible of $2,000 or more for an individual. The share of workers with such a plan has increased 32% over the last five years and 77% over the last 10 years, the report said.

Rising drug and hospital costs are often cited as major culprits for rising health insurance costs, and neither shows signs of ebbing.

“Early reports suggest that cost trends will be higher for 2026, potentially leading to higher premium increases unless employers and plans find ways to offset higher costs through changes to benefits, cost sharing, or plan design,” the KFF survey said.

One big concern among employers is the high price of GLP-1 drugs for weight loss, which a growing number of companies cover. Their high prices, combined with strong demand, have led some workplaces to tighten or eliminate coverage for weight loss.

“Large employers know these new high-priced weight-loss drugs are an important benefit for their workers, but their costs often exceed their expectations,” study author Gary Claxton, a KFF senior vice president, said in a press release. “It’s not a surprise that some are rethinking access to the drugs for weight loss.”

Employers typically respond to higher health costs by shifting costs to their workers, but it’s unclear how much more financial pain workers can take. The survey found nearly half of large employers said their employees have “moderate” or “high” concerns about their level of cost sharing.

While the rising cost of employer-sponsored insurance has outpaced general inflation, the issue received scant attention in recent months on Capitol Hill. To help pay for extending tax cuts, Trump’s tax and spending law reduces by billions of dollars the amount the government spends on Medicaid, the state-federal health insurance program for 70 million low-income and disabled people. Congressional budget scorekeepers predict the cuts to Medicaid will lead to millions more people becoming uninsured over the next decade.

The federal government has been shut down since Oct. 1 as Democrats refuse to vote for a new spending measure unless Republicans agree to extend tax credits that help about 22 million people buy health coverage through the ACA marketplaces. Without congressional action, the tax credits will expire, and premiums will double for many consumers, starting in January.

The KFF report is based on a survey this year of 1,862 randomly selected nonfederal public and private employers with 10 or more workers.

©2025 KFF Health News. Distributed by Tribune Content Agency, LLC.

Average long-term US mortgage rate drops to 6.19%, lowest level in more than a year

posted in: All news | 0

By ALEX VEIGA, AP Business Writer

The average rate on a 30-year U.S. mortgage fell this week to its lowest level in more than a year, extending a recent trend that’s helped give lagging U.S. home sales a boost.

The average long-term mortgage rate fell to 6.19% from 6.27% last week, mortgage buyer Freddie Mac said Thursday. A year ago, the rate averaged 6.54%.

This is the third straight weekly decline and it brings the average rate to its lowest level since Oct. 3, 2024, when it was 6.12%.

Borrowing costs on 15-year fixed-rate mortgages, popular with homeowners refinancing their home loans, also eased this week. The average rate dropped to 5.44% from 5.52% last week. A year ago, it was 5.71%, Freddie Mac said.

Mortgage rates are influenced by several factors, from the Federal Reserve’s interest rate policy decisions to bond market investors’ expectations for the economy and inflation. They generally follow the trajectory of the 10-year Treasury yield, which lenders use as a guide to pricing home loans.

The 10-year yield was at 3.99% at midday Thursday, not far from around 3.97% the same time last week.

The average rate on a 30-year mortgage has remained above 6% since September 2022, the year mortgage rates began climbing from historic lows. The housing market has been in a slump ever since.

Sales of previously occupied U.S. homes sank last year to their lowest level in nearly 30 years. Sales have remained sluggish this year, but accelerated last month to their fastest pace since February as mortgage rates eased.

Mortgage rates started declining in July in the lead-up to the Federal Reserve’s decision last month to cut its main interest rate for the first time in a year amid growing concern over the U.S. job market.

Related Articles


US home sales accelerated in September to their fastest pace since February as mortgage rates eased


Wall Street drifts as gains for oil companies help make up for Tesla’s and IBM’s losses


Protect your health and your wealth: 5 tips to beat medical debt


Cannabis shop near Stillwater rec center on Planning Commission agenda


Prince Harry, Meghan join Steve Bannon, Glenn Beck in call for ban on development of AI ‘superintelligence’

At their September policy meeting, Fed officials forecast that the central bank would reduce its rate twice more this year and once in 2026. Still, the Fed could change course if inflation jumps amid the Trump administration’s expanding use of tariffs and the recent trade war escalation with China.

Even if the Fed opts to cut its short-term rate further that doesn’t necessarily mean mortgage rates will keep declining. Last fall, after the Fed cut its rate for the first time in more than four years, mortgage rates marched higher, eventually reaching just above 7% in January this year.

The late-summer pullback in rates has helped spur homeowners who bought in recent years after rates climbed above 6% to refinance their home loan to a lower rate.

Mortgage applications, which include loans to buy a home or refinance an existing mortgage, slipped 0.3% last week from a week earlier, according to the Mortgage Bankers Association. But applications for mortgage refinance loans made up nearly 56% of all applications, a slight increase from the previous week.

Many prospective homebuyers are also turning to adjustable-rate mortgages. Such loans, which typically offer lower initial interest rates than traditional 30-year, fixed-rate mortgages, accounted for 10.8% of all mortgage applications last week.

Mortgage rates will have to drop below 6% to make refinancing an attractive option to a broader swath of homeowners, however. That’s because about 80% of U.S. homes with a mortgage have a rate below 6% and 53% have a rate below 4%, according to Realtor.com.