‘I’m Afraid of Wasting Away’: City Food Pantries Struggle As Funding Shrinks & Demand Grows

posted in: All news | 0

As federal support dries up, the lines outside New York City pantries stretch down blocks and around corners. Advocates say the city needs to ramp up funding for its emergency food assistance program to help offset cuts from Washington, D.C.

Clients waiting in the lobby of St. John’s Bread & Life food pantry in Bedford-Stuyvesant. (Photo by Adi Talwar) 

As councilmembers filed up and down the steps of City Hall last week carrying hefty lunch boxes, a coalition of local emergency food providers assembled on the stairs of the building to sound the alarm on the accelerating food insecurity crisis in New York City. 

For local food pantries, a storm is on the horizon. President Trump’s proposed “Big, Beautiful Bill” has been rolling along the U.S. Senate floor, targeting food security programs, including the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP). The bill would shift $2.1 billion in costs onto New York State and local county governments, according to a memo sent out by Gov. Kathy Hochul last Friday.

Programs are already struggling. After the suspension of FEMA’s Emergency Food and Shelter Program in February, food banks across the nation began wondering how they would manage to keep their shelves stocked. Now facing additional cuts—$1 billion slashed from local food banks and schools and an additional $500 million from the Emergency Food Assistance Program (TEFAP)—providers are left with full tables, but empty plates. 

New York receives around $30 million annually in supplemental funding through TEFAP to help meet the growing demand for food assistance across the state. As federal support shrinks, the lines outside New York City pantries stretch down blocks and around corners. 

“People start lining up at our food pantry at 5 a.m. We don’t open until 9 a.m. We’re seeing parents push their children in their empty grocery carts,” said Alex Hughes, the director of hunger prevention and advocacy at Project Hospitality, a non-profit on Staten Island providing food and shelter. 

Despite growing demand, funding for Community Food Connection (CFC), the city’s largest provider of emergency food assistance, has hardly changed since 2022. Mayor Eric Adams’ executive budget for the upcoming fiscal year, which starts July 1, proposes $57 million, down slightly from $60 million this current fiscal year. 

But the City Council and anti-hunger advocates are pushing for $100 million for the program, citing the impact of federal cuts. More than 700 community kitchens rely on it.

Jilly Stephens, director of City Harvest, called that amount “a modest ask with outsized importance,” noting it would account for only .08 percent of the mayor’s proposed $115.1 billion budget.  

A rally outside City Hall on June 24, 2025, pressing for more funding for emergency food providers. (Photo by Adi Talwar)

At last week’s rally, organizers from City Harvest, Food Bank for New York City and United Way said local food pantry visits are only increasing, and it’s not looking like the numbers will subside any time soon. FeedNYC data shows there’s been an 85 percent increase in the number of average monthly visits to food banks across the city since 2019. 

Pantry leaders were convinced the situation would simmer down after the pandemic, when need skyrocketed, but it’s only escalated. “In 2019, there were about 25 million visits to food pantries across the city. Last year, there were more than 46 million visits to those same organizations,” shared Stephens. 

“If the funding is cut, I’ll be in trouble. I’m afraid of wasting away,” said Kenneth Johnson, a Lower East Side resident who gets meals at the Sirovich Senior Center because his fixed income doesn’t allow him to afford groceries from supermarkets. Johnson said he has been struggling to put on weight. 

Louise Villacci, the CEO of Leading Individuals From Trauma, a nonprofit based on Long Island that provides support resources to individuals who have experienced trauma and struggle with food insecurity, said she and her business partner had to personally cover $600 of their usual food order last week due to federal cuts. 

“The money is being frozen, If we want something we have to reach into our own pockets and buy the food,” Villaci explained.  

Kenneth Johnson attended a rally in support of the city’s emergency food programs last week. “If the funding is cut, I’ll be in trouble,” he told City Limits. (Photo by Adi Talwar)

Community organizations are already dealing with the effects of the FEMA funding pause: 97 groups across the city are owed over $1.3 million for food and emergency services they’ve already delivered, according to the president of United Way of New York City, Grace Bonilla. 

Emmy Brett, the director of Greenpoint Hunger Program, criticized the mayor’s budget proposal, saying the administration’s efforts to prioritize public safety fall short of addressing the equally critical need to keep New Yorkers fed. 

“The mayor is demanding that food justice organizations like the ones behind me tighten our belts. But what he does not understand is that we have been tightening our belts,” she said. 

“A hungry city is not a safe city—a hungry city is a place where we have to lock up baby formula in cages in our grocery stores as people grow desperate for ways to feed their families,” Brett said. “That’s not New York.”

St. John’s Bread of Life

At 6:30 a.m., there was already a line at St. John’s Bread of Life, a food bank tucked between Malcolm X Boulevard and Patchen Avenue in Bedford-Stuyvesant. 

On Tuesday, as record-breaking heat scorched New York City, pantry visitors endured the sweltering conditions to receive a hot meal and a warm “hello” from Sister Caroline Tweedy, the program’s executive director. 

Sister Caroline Tweedy, left, executive director of St. John’s Bread & Life, and Sister Marie Sorenson, right, associate executive director. (Photo by Adi Talwar)

“This is a safety net for folks—a place where they can find people to walk alongside them as they begin their journey to stability,” said Tweedy. With over 35 years of social work experience, she said wanted to cultivate an organization that offered sustenance to struggling individuals, as well as an array of social services.

St. John’s Bread of Life is a spacious brick building with two floors. On the first floor, visitors cross a waiting lobby and enter a room in the back equipped with self-ordering machines, where they scan their membership cards to order their weekly supply of groceries. 

They can choose from a range of options, from basic necessities like oil, rice, beans, and milk to more substantial proteins such as ground beef, canned tuna, and chicken. After placing their order, families sit in the lobby and patiently wait for their name to be called. 

Contents of a single microwavable food bag prepared for clients experiencing homelessness at St. John’s Bread & Life. (Photo by Adi Talwar)

Upstairs, pantry guests have access to case management services, including legal assistance, medical support, and even a mail office for those who can’t receive correspondence at their place of residence.

“We have a relationship with Urban Justice, and our clinic is run by Care for the Homeless,” said Tweedy, adding that the pantry welcomes 9,000 guests a week in search of food and oftentimes social services. 

Before the pandemic, St. John’s Bread of Life would distribute less than a million meals a year. Now Tweedy and her colleague Sister Marie Sorenson hand out 5 million plates of food annually.

“We anticipated that it would go back to normal after COVID,” Sorenson said. “But there is no normal anymore. And our funding has gone down this year. So it’s very unpredictable. We’re facing a lot of uncertainty.”

Still, they say they’ve never had to turn anyone away, thanks to heavy fundraising and extra help from organizations like United Way, which stepped in when the state’s Hunger Prevention and Nutrition Assistance Program denied them a grant in 2023. 

Tweedy doesn’t enjoy having to put limits on the number of food options for clients or the amount of times they can shop, but she says it’s a “necessary evil” at this point in order for their program to survive. 

“People are just going to plunge further and further into poverty,” Sorenson said in response to proposed cuts. “We were founded to be that gap between running out of SNAP money or waiting for that next check, and now we’re people’s sole support. And that’s very scary.”  

Microwavable food bags prepared for clients experiencing homelessness at St. John’s Bread & Life. (Photo by Adi Talwar)

The Trump administration’s “Big, Beautiful Bill” would not only halt funding to the federal program responsible for funding food pantries across the city, but also proposes the largest cut to SNAP benefits in history—eliminating $300 billion over the next 10 years. 

The bill also imposes stricter eligibility requirements. Some recipients will need to prove they work 80 hours per month, and those who are unable to meet this demand after 90 days won’t be eligible for SNAP for three years. The change would disproportionately affect people with unpredictable work situations, chronic illness, or caregiving responsibilities, advocates say. 

If passed, more than 300,000 households in New York would lose access to food assistance, warned Gov. Kathy Hochul. This additional rollback in federal support would put significant pressure on local food pantries that will not be equipped to handle a surge in visits. 

“These are our brothers and sisters waiting in line down there, we need to treat them with dignity,” said Sorenson. “Why is our gaze always looking down at people who are struggling when we’re looking at a financial crisis? Why doesn’t it ever look up at the system?”

To reach the reporter behind this story, contact Marianad@citylimits.org. To reach the editor, contact Jeanmarie@citylimits.org

Want to republish this story? Find City Limits’ reprint policy here.

The post ‘I’m Afraid of Wasting Away’: City Food Pantries Struggle As Funding Shrinks & Demand Grows appeared first on City Limits.

Supreme Court upholds Texas law aimed at blocking kids from seeing pornography online

posted in: All news | 0

By LINDSAY WHITEHURST

WASHINGTON (AP) — The Supreme Court on Friday upheld a Texas law aimed at blocking children under 18 from seeing online pornography.

Related Articles


RFK Jr.’s made promises about vaccines. Here’s what he’s done as health secretary


Supreme Court says Maryland parents can pull their kids from public school lessons using LGBTQ books


Supreme Court preserves key part of Obamacare coverage requirements


Supreme Court OKs fee that subsidizes phone, internet services in schools, libraries and rural areas


Supreme Court limits nationwide injunctions, but fate of Trump birthright citizenship order unclear

Nearly half all states have passed similar age verification laws as smartphones and other devices make it easier to access online porn, including hardcore obscene material.

The 6-3 ruling comes after an adult-entertainment industry trade group called the Free Speech Coalition challenged the Texas law. The court split along ideological lines.

The group said the law puts an unfair free-speech burden on adults by requiring them to submit personal information that could be vulnerable to hacking or tracking. It agreed, though, that children under 18 shouldn’t be seeing porn.

A leading adult-content website, Pornhub, has stopped operating in several states, citing the technical and privacy hurdles in complying with the laws.

The Supreme Court has confronted the issue before. In 1996, it struck down parts of a law banning explicit material viewable by kids online. A divided court also ruled against a different federal law aimed at stopping kids from being exposed to porn in 2004 but said less restrictive measures like content filtering are constitutional.

Texas argues that technology has improved significantly in the last 20 years, allowing online platforms to easily check users’ ages with a quick picture. Those requirements are more like ID checks at brick-and-mortar adult stores that were upheld by the Supreme Court in the 1960s, the state said.

District courts initially blocked laws in Indiana and Tennessee as well as Texas, but appeals courts reversed the decisions and let the laws take effect.

Associated Press writer Jonathan Mattise in Nashville contributed to this report.

Follow the AP’s coverage of the U.S. Supreme Court at https://apnews.com/hub/us-supreme-court.

Affidavits reveal details of alleged shooter’s plan, leadup to fatal attacks on Minnesota lawmakers, spouses

posted in: All news | 0

Ahead of a key court hearing Friday, June 27, authorities have publicly revealed new details in the case against Vance Boelter, the suspect in the June 14 shootings of two Minnesota lawmakers and their spouses.

Multiple affidavits — one of which was unsealed on June 20 — outline how Boelter allegedly planned and carried out the attack, as well as what followed in its aftermath.

Inside Boelter’s SUV, disguised as a cop car

After Boelter fled on foot from officers in Brooklyn Park on Saturday, June 14, law enforcement searched the SUV that Boelter left behind and found five firearms, including semi-automatic assault style rifles, and “a large quantity of ammunition,” according to the post-arrest affidavit.

Law enforcement officers also reportedly found several notebooks in the SUV, among which was a list of more than 45 public officials in Minnesota, including Rep. Melissa Hortman, who was fatally shot alongside her husband, Mark, on June 14. Next to Rep. Hortman’s name was her home address, according to affidavits.

Another notebook contained lists of search engines for researching people’s personal information. Within the notes, titled “finding people,” were side notes under individual websites, including “not free,” “three days free,” “need name, phone number or address,” and “just enter a name and state.”

The SUV also contained a GPS navigation system, with a trip history that included the addresses of five public officials’ homes, according to the post-arrest affidavit.

Boelter’s family, text messages

The post-arrest affidavit said that law enforcement obtained the information to track the cell phones of Boelter and his wife, Jenny, on Saturday. After Jenny Boelter consented to a search of her phone, law enforcement saw a text sent from Vance Boelter at 6:18 a.m. on Saturday in a group text message.

“Dad went to war last night … I don’t want to say any more because I don’t want to implicate anybody,” The text message read, according to a post-arrest affidavit.

According to the affidavit, Boelter sent another text around the same time that said, “Words are not gonna explain how sorry I am for this situation … There’s gonna be some people coming to the house armed and trigger-happy and I don’t want you guys around.”

Jenny Boelter also consented to a search of her car, in which officers recovered two handguns, approximately $10,000 in cash, and passports for Jenny Boelter and her children, according to the post-arrest affidavit.

“Boelter and his wife had been ‘preppers,’ or people who prepare for major or catastrophic incidents. At some point, Boelter had given his wife a ‘bailout plan’ — i.e., a plan of where to go in case of exigent circumstances — to go [to] her mother’s residence in Spring Brook, Wisconsin,” FBI Special Agent Terry Getsch wrote in the pre-arrest affidavit.

Searches in North Minneapolis

During the search of Boelter’s North Minneapolis residence on Saturday, officers found a separate list of officials ’ names, “many of those same public officials named in the notebooks found in Boelter’s SUV,” the post-arrest affidavit said.

In another notebook recovered at the North Minneapolis residence, Rep. Hortman’s name was listed with notes saying “married Mark two children eleventh term,” and “big house off golf course two ways in to watch from one spot.”

Officers also found a receipt of a June 9 purchase from Fleet Farm, which, among other things, included a flashlight, a tactical rifle case, two types of firearm ammunition and the materials “believed to have been used to create the fake ‘POLICE’ license plate attached to Boelter’s SUV,” the post-arrest affidavit wrote.

Officers also found notebooks that contained research on websites for purchasing silicone masks, similar to the one Boelter can reportedly be seen wearing on camera footage recorded at Sen. John Hoffman’s residence in Champlin on June 14.

On the morning of June 14, Boelter reportedly met with “Witness 1,” as described in the affidavit, in North Minneapolis to purchase both an e-bike and a Buick. Witness 1 told law enforcement that Boelter carried two duffel bags with him when they met and that Boelter and Witness 1 drove together to a U.S. Bank in Robbinsdale.

Boelter withdrew $2,200, thereby emptying an account in his name, and reportedly paid Witness 1 $900 for the purchase of the e-bike and the Buick, according to the post-arrest affidavit.

Search in Green Isle

Around 2:30 a.m. on June 15, law enforcement was notified of an individual on an e-bike, approximately two miles Northeast of Boelter’s family home in Green Isle, according to the post-arrest affidavit.

After further investigation, officers discovered an abandoned Buick on Highway 25 close to the sighting of the individuals on an e-bike in Green Isle, the post-arrest affidavit said.

In the Buick, law enforcement recovered a handwritten letter to the FBI. The writer of that letter, who claimed his name was “Dr. Vance Luther Boelter,” admitted to being “the shooter at large in Minnesota involved in the two shootings the morning of Saturday.”

Boelter faces  state and federal charges in the murders of Rep. Melissa Hortman and her husband Mark, and the shooting of Sen. John Hoffman and his wife, Yvette. His next court appearance is scheduled for Friday, June 27, at the U.S. courthouse in St. Paul.

If convicted, the federal charges carry a maximum sentence of life in prison or the death penalty. Boelter remains in custody ahead of the hearing.

Related Articles


Congress unanimously passes resolution honoring Melissa Hortman, husband


Former House Speaker Melissa Hortman, husband Mark, to lie in state with their dog, Gilbert, on Friday


Mike Lee’s posts about the Minnesota shootings incensed fellow senators. They refused to let it go.


Suspected assassin was one of thousands Walz appointed to various boards


Suspect in Minnesota lawmaker attacks was a doomsday prepper, investigator says

 

Supreme Court says Maryland parents can pull their kids from public school lessons using LGBTQ books

posted in: All news | 0

By MARK SHERMAN

WASHINGTON (AP) — The Supreme Court ruled on Friday that Maryland parents who have religious objections can pull their children from public school lessons using LGBTQ storybooks.

The justices reversed lower-court rulings in favor of the Montgomery County school system in suburban Washington. The high court ruled that the schools likely could not require elementary school children to sit through lessons involving the books if parents expressed religious objections to the material.

The decision was not a final ruling in the case, but the justices strongly suggested that the parents will win in the end.

The court ruled that policies like the one at issue in the case are subjected to the strictest level of review, nearly always dooming them.

The school district introduced the storybooks, including “Prince & Knight” and “Uncle Bobby’s Wedding,” in 2022 as part of an effort to better reflect the district’s diversity. In “Uncle Bobby’s Wedding,” a niece worries that her uncle won’t have as much time for her after he gets married to another man.

The justices have repeatedly endorsed claims of religious discrimination in recent years and the case is among several religious-rights cases at the court this term. The decision also comes amid increases in recent years in books being banned from public school and public libraries.

Many of the removals were organized by Moms for Liberty and other conservative organizations that advocate for more parental input over what books are available to students. Soon after President Donald Trump, a Republican, took office in January, the Education Department called the book bans a “hoax” and dismissed 11 complaints that had been filed under Trump’s predecessor, President Joe Biden, a Democrat.

Related Articles


Supreme Court preserves key part of Obamacare coverage requirements


Supreme Court OKs fee that subsidizes phone, internet services in schools, libraries and rural areas


Supreme Court limits nationwide injunctions, but fate of Trump birthright citizenship order unclear


Deal with Beijing will speed China’s export of minerals to the US, treasury secretary says


Canadian man held by immigration officials dies in South Florida federal facility, officials say

The writers’ group Pen America said in a court filing in the Maryland case that the objecting parents wanted “a constitutionally suspect book ban by another name.” Pen America reported more than 10,000 books were banned in the last school year.

Parents initially had been allowed to opt their children out of the lessons for religious and other reasons, but the school board reversed course a year later, prompting protests and eventually a lawsuit.

At arguments in April, a lawyer for the school district told the justices that the “opt outs” had become disruptive. Sex education is the only area of instruction in Montgomery schools that students can be excused from, lawyer Alan Schoenfeld said.

The case hit unusually close to home, as three justices live in the county, though they didn’t send their children to public schools.

Follow the AP’s coverage of the U.S. Supreme Court at https://apnews.com/hub/us-supreme-court.