Fringe review: ‘The Year of Sluttery’ is a slightly cringey book recital

posted in: All news | 0

Could Be Worse

Listening to the intimate details of friends’ dates and hook-ups is fun. Watching Scarlett d. Jones recite stories from her book “The Year of Sluttery: A Journey of Sex, Self, and Singlehood” — pages of which are printed out on a music stand in front of her — for “The Year of Sluttery” show is slightly cringey. She cheerfully recounts the “audacious b****” she is post-marriage, and all respect to her for embracing her sexuality! At times, the act seems to be a chance for her to laugh at her own jokes. Still, witnessing someone’s joy as they recount a transformative time in their life — even if it involves sexting — can be wholesome.

Presented by Scarlett d. Jones at Open Eye Theatre; 8:30 p.m. Aug. 5, 10 p.m. Aug. 7, 2:30 p.m. Aug. 10

Still trying to decide what to see? Check out all the Pioneer Press 2025 Fringe reviews, with each show rated on a scale of Must See, Worth Considering, Could Be Worse or You Can Skip It.

The Minnesota Fringe Festival is presenting nearly 100 hourlong stage acts from July 31 through Aug. 10 around Minneapolis. Visit MinnesotaFringe.org for ticket and show information.

Related Articles


Fringe review: Fun in theory, ‘Ping Prov’ is imperfect in front of an audience


Fringe review: ‘Insomnia Dogs’ is an ingenious concept without a resolution


Fringe review: ‘Pineapple Kryptonite’ is a tepid monologue on the mundane


Fringe review: ‘Academonic’ draws audiences into the suspense


Fringe review: ‘Duluth: An Improvised Midwest Murder’ is klutzy and funny

August recess can’t hide tensions ahead for Congress on spending and Trump nominations

posted in: All news | 0

By KEVIN FREKING, Associated Press

WASHINGTON (AP) — Lawmakers have left Washington for the annual August recess, but a few weeks of relative quiet on the U.S. Capitol grounds can’t mask the partisan tensions that are brewing on government funding and President Donald Trump’s nominees. It could make for a momentous September.

Here’s a look at what’s ahead when lawmakers return following the Labor Day holiday.

A bitter spending battle ahead

Lawmakers will use much of September to work on spending bills for the coming budget year, which begins Oct. 1. They likely will need to pass a short-term spending measure to keep the government funded for a few weeks while they work on a longer-term measure that covers the full year.

It’s not unusual for leaders from both parties to blame the other party for a potential shutdown, but the rhetoric began extra early this year, signaling the threat of a stoppage is more serious than usual.

Sen. Minority Leader Chuck Schumer of N.Y., listens during a news conference on tariffs on Capitol Hill, Thursday, July 31, 2025, in Washington. (AP Photo/Mariam Zuhaib)

On Monday, Senate Democratic leader Chuck Schumer and House Democratic leader Hakeem Jeffries sent their Republican counterparts a sharply-worded letter calling for a meeting to discuss “the government funding deadline and the health care crisis you have visited upon the American people.”

They said it will take bipartisanship to avert a “painful, unnecessary shutdown.”

“Yet it is clear that the Trump Administration and many in your party are preparing to go it alone and continue to legislate on a solely Republican basis,” said the letter sent to Senate Majority Leader John Thune and House Speaker Mike Johnson.

Republicans have taken note of the warnings and are portraying the Democrats as itching for a shutdown they hope to blame on the GOP.

“It was disturbing to hear the Democrat leader threaten to shut down the government in his July 8 Dear Colleague letter,” Thune said on Saturday. “… I really hope that Democrats will not embrace that position but will continue to work with Republicans to fund the government.”

Different approaches from the House and Senate

So far, the House has approved two of the 12 annual spending bills, mostly along party lines. The Senate has passed three on a strongly bipartisan basis. The House is pursuing steep, non-defense spending cuts. The Senate is rejecting many of those cuts. One side will have to give. And any final bill will need some Democratic support to generate the 60 votes necessary to get a spending measure to the finish line.

Some Democratic senators are also wanting assurances from Republicans that there won’t be more efforts in the coming weeks to claw back or cancel funding already approved by Congress.

“If Republicans want to make a deal, then let’s make a deal, but only if Republicans include an agreement they won’t take back that deal a few weeks later,” said Sen. Elizabeth Warren, D-Mass.

The U.S. Capitol is reflected in a puddle outside of the Rayburn House Office Building, Wednesday, July 16, 2025, on Capitol Hill in Washington. (AP Photo/Julia Demaree Nikhinson)

Rep. Chuck Fleischmann, R-Tenn., a veteran member of the House Appropriations committee, said the Democratic minority in both chambers has suffered so many legislative losses this year, “that they are stuck between a rock and their voting base.” Democrats may want to demonstrate more resistance to Trump, but they would rue a shutdown, he warned.

“The reality would be, if the government were shut down, the administration, Donald Trump, would have the ability to decide where to spend and not spend,” Fleischmann said. “Schumer knows that, Jeffries knows that. We know that. I think it would be much more productive if we start talking about a short-term (continuing resolution.)”

Related Articles


Mitch McConnell’s legacy comes under fire in Kentucky race to replace him in the Senate


Texas dispute highlights nation’s long history of partisan gerrymandering. Is it legal?


Immigrant kids detained in ‘unsafe and unsanitary’ sites as Trump team seeks to end protections


State Department may require visa applicants to post bond of up to $15,000 to enter the US


Texas governor threatens to remove Democrats who left the state over Trump-backed redistricting

Republican angry about pace of nominations

Republicans are considering changes to Senate rules to get more of Trump’s nominees confirmed.

Thune said last week that during the same point in Joe Biden’s presidency, 49 of his 121 civilians nominees had been confirmed on an expedited basis through a voice vote or a unanimous consent request. Trump has had none of his civilian nominees confirmed on an expedited basis. Democrats have insisted on roll call votes for all of them, a lengthy process than can take days.

“I think they’re desperately in need of change,” Thune said of Senate rules for considering nominees. “I think that the last six months have demonstrated that this process, nominations is broken. And so I expect there will be some good robust conversations about that.”

Schumer said a rules change would be a “huge mistake,” especially as Senate Republicans will need Democratic votes to pass spending bills and other legislation moving forward.

The Senate held a rare weekend session as Republicans worked to get more of Trump’s nominees confirmed. Negotiations focused on advancing dozens of additional Trump nominees in exchange for some concessions on releasing some already approved spending.

At times, lawmakers spoke of progress on a potential deal. But it was clear that there would be no agreement when Trump attacked Schumer on social media Saturday evening and told Republicans to pack it up and go home.

“Tell Schumer, who is under tremendous political pressure from within his own party, the Radical Left Lunatics, to GO TO HELL!” Trump posted on Truth Social.

Associated Press writers Mary Clare Jalonick and Joey Cappelletti contributed to this report.

Can Anything Halt the Gerrymandering Arms Race?

posted in: All news | 0

Late Sunday afternoon, dozens of Texas House Democrats boarded a charter flight at the Austin airport and absconded to the Land of Lincoln in an attempt to halt, if not stop altogether, Republicans’ heavy-handed scheme to redraw the state’s congressional map to increase the GOP advantage by as many as five seats. 

Backed by Illinois Governor J.B. Pritzker, who provided safe haven to the more than 50 members who fled, Texas House Dems are pledging to do anything and everything possible to stop the tilting of the playing field ahead of the 2026 midterms. Fleeing the state was about the only tool in their kit, a bid to deny the lower chamber the constitutionally required two-thirds of members to convene. 

“We’re not walking out on our responsibilities. We’re walking out on a rigged system that refuses to listen to the people we represent,” Democratic caucus chair Gene Wu said in a statement. “As of today, this corrupt special session is over.”

This marks the second time in four years that the minority party in the lower chamber has broken quorum over voting rights issues. It’s the beginning of another dicey high-stakes political fight that seemingly has no end other than the GOP ultimately getting its way—if not now, then soon enough. It also leaves Texans contemplating the prospect of an eternity spent damned to endless special sessions. 

So, how did we get here? Upon orders from President Donald Trump and his political operatives to carve up the existing maps to add precisely five more Republican-favored seats ahead of the 2026 midterms, Governor Greg Abbott called a special session last month that tucked redistricting into a long list of agenda items. 

At the start of session, the House and Senate select committee on redistricting held a handful of hearings to take public testimony on the prospect of new maps—without even having a proposed map on which to testify. Then after the perfunctory public hearings ended, a new map was introduced via House Bill 4, which strategically packed and cracked Black and Latino communities in Central and South Texas, Houston, and Dallas-Fort Worth, while generally throwing the current Democratic congressional delegation into chaos. The proposal could well give Republicans control of 85 percent of Texas’ 35 U.S. House seats—compared to the roughly 58 percent of votes a statewide Republican candidate can expect to earn.

In the first and only hearing on the actual map, held last Friday, bill “author” and GOP state Representative Todd Hunter repeatedly insisted that the measure was purely about maximizing Republican political performance in Texas. In case it was unclear, yes, he’s using that declaration as a moral defense of the proposal—since the U.S. Supreme Court has okayed partisan gerrymandering, while race-based gerrymanders are still (technically) forbidden by the Voting Rights Act.

The House redistricting committee’s one marathon hearing on HB 4 was dominated by members of the public, including Democratic members of Congress themselves, who opposed the bill.. Then, early the next morning, the map was approved along a party-line vote and scheduled for a vote on the House floor Monday. 

While House Democrats in Chicago, plus some in New York, seem willing and able to withhold their numbers for the remaining weeks of this first 30-day special session, all that would do is delay the inevitable. In order to truly throw a wrench in the GOP’s machinations, Dems would likely have to keep their quorum break going through November, when the state opens up candidate filing for the 2026 elections. 

That would require maintaining an organized quorum break of more than 90 days—easily the longest in Texas history—through possibly three special sessions and under more punitive political conditions than ever.

After the 2021 quorum break, the GOP-controlled House instituted new rules that impose a $500-a-day fine on each so-called political fugitive, a penalty that cannot be paid using individual campaign funds. (Thanks to our threadbare ethics laws, though, they could likely get around this through various creative legal arrangements, like cash “honorariums” or becoming paid “consultants” for whichever deep-pocketed donor ponies up.) Republicans back in Austin, meanwhile, are calling on Democratic members to be stripped of committee leadership positions and office budgets.

Abbott also issued a letter claiming dubious authority to declare Democrats’ offices vacated and call special elections to replace them. He also warned that Democrats who accepted funds from outside parties to pay the daily fines may be violating state bribery laws—something, it bears noting, that many Republicans cared little about when the appearance of venality marred Attorney General Ken Paxton’s impeachment trial.

National Democrats have pledged to support the state House Democrats come hell or high water; U.S House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries even visited Austin to pledge his support for Dems if they decided to flee, though he offered little in the way of specifics. 

So far, the nascent quorum break has resulted in high-profile media coverage and widespread praise and support from fellow Democrats across the country. Texas House Democrats are presenting a unified front, though not all have joined the effort. 

House Dems’ quorum break back in 2021 began in similar fashion. The caucus fled to Washington, D.C., to block passage of a Texas GOP draconian voter suppression bill. The ostensible mission in the nation’s capital was to pressure President Joe Biden and congressional Democrats to pass the John R. Lewis Voting Rights Advancement Act, which would have shored up and expanded the right to the ballot box nationwide—and would have cracked down on partisan and racial gerrymandering. 

But Senate Democrats including Joe Manchin and Kyrsten Sinema were unmoved and the federal legislation did not budge. Meanwhile, as the days and weeks dragged on, Texas Democrats in exile grew weary, increasingly fractured, and eager for a political off-ramp. Eventually a contingent—including House Dem du jour James Talarico—peeled off from the larger group and returned to Austin, restoring a quorum on the House floor. The whole ordeal was a massive stress test for a diverse caucus that has a hard time staying united on any one issue even when the stakes are much lower. They were able to claim only a modicum of victory when the ultimate version of the voting bill excised some of the most pernicious provisions. 

Asked at a press conference outside Chicago Sunday night about how Democrats will avoid a fate similar to the 2021 quorum break, caucus Chair Gene Wu replied: “This is not 2021. The threat is to not just our state but the entire country.” 

As Texas Democrats argue, if they don’t stop this new Republican map from passing in Texas, then the entire country will be thrown into an unrelenting gerrymandering arms race—with major blue states California, New York, and Illinois gerrymandering their own maps (in some cases already quite gerrymandered in their own right) to counteract the Texas GOP’s rigging. Trump, meanwhile, has reportedly set his sights on additional redrawing in red states including Missouri. 

At this point, that arms race seems like an inevitable outcome that no quorum break—regardless of how long—can prevent. 

The post Can Anything Halt the Gerrymandering Arms Race? appeared first on The Texas Observer.

Review: Artistry’s ‘Singin’ in the Rain’ an enjoyable escape

posted in: All news | 0

Blame our current tension levels, but indications are that folks might be desperately seeking what advertising copy used to call “the feel-good musical of the year!”

They haven’t found it this summer in the Guthrie Theater’s unquestionably excellent “Cabaret,” which invites you to examine the historical parallels between Nazi Germany and modern America. So it would appear that many have turned to Bloomington’s Artistry Theater to find some respite from all the unsettling disorder.

The company’s new production of “Singin’ in the Rain” has attracted such an audience that Sunday afternoon’s performance was sold out and the show’s run extended for a week before it even opened. Clearly, there’s a local theatrical thirst for something light and bubbly, unapologetically retro and with plenty to laugh about.

The cast of Artistry Theater’s production of “Singin’ in the Rain,” running through Aug. 31, 2025 at the Bloomington Center for the Arts. (Courtesy of Alyssa Kristine Photography)

And Artistry has succeeded in providing that. Sure, it’s tough trying to fill the ample dancing shoes of Gene Kelly, Donald O’Connor and the cast of the 1952 film that’s been voted the greatest of movie musicals by multiple panels of experts. But live theater has advantages cinema can’t touch – especially cinema in your living room.

Don Lockwood (Danny McHugh) performs the title song in Artistry Theater’s production of “Singin’ in the Rain.” (Courtesy of Alyssa Kristine Photography)

For example, re-shoots and editing can wedge some distance between viewers and the humanity of dance, but this show will remind you how much work and athleticism goes into it. Director Kelli Foster Warder and her co-choreographer, Danny McHugh, ask a lot of this cast of 16, and they come through with some thrilling footwork.

And, like Gene Kelly before him, McHugh pulls impressive double duty by portraying the central character, too. (O.K., Kelly did him one better by also co-directing the film.) It’s a winning performance, McHugh’s lovely tenor voice and smooth delivery of the dances complemented by the looser but infectiously enthusiastic approach of Armando Harlow Ronconi and the grace of Brittany Mendoza-Pena.

They’re the trio at the center of a story about Hollywood’s transition from the silent era to the hotbed of slick and sparkly dance-filled musicals that offered enjoyable escape to Depression-era audiences. McHugh is Don Lockwood, who seems a good candidate for surviving the change, thanks to his Vaudeville song-and-dance experience, as would his musician buddy, Cosmo Brown (Ronconi). And it’s a medium ideal for the voice and dancing chops of Lockwood’s love interest, Kathy Selden (Mendoza-Pena).

Each performer impresses in their own way as we observe a humorous take on an industry’s transition. While the comic timing could be crisper and the pace swifter in the dialogue-driven scenes, the dance numbers eclipse any such quibbles.

Don Lockwood (Danny McHugh) and Cosmo Brown (Armando Harlow Ronconi) recount their days as a vaudeville team in Artistry Theater’s production of “Singin’ in the Rain,” running through Aug. 31, 2025 at the Bloomington Center for the Arts. (Courtesy of Alyssa Kristine Photography)

Warder and McHugh incorporate elements of the original choreography from the film, but put their own stamp upon much of it. And you may get a fresh appreciation for what this kind of dancing requires when the knockout tap trio of “Good Morning” gives way to McHugh ably stepping into Kelly’s signature scene, the urban splash fest that is the title tune.

Members of the cast of Artistry Theater’s production of “Singin’ in the Rain,” running through Aug. 31, 2025 at the Bloomington Center for the Arts. (Courtesy of Alyssa Kristine Photography)

For those who take comfort in the familiar, rest assured that Serena Brook basically offers a spot-on imitation of Jean Hagen as the shrill-voiced star of silent cinema, Lina Lamont, the diva who might drag the studio down with her. But it’s a solid performance in a show full of them, one that ably fulfills its mission of making audiences feel good.

Rob Hubbard can be reached at wordhub@yahoo.com.

Artistry Theater’s ‘Singin’ in the Rain’

When: Through Aug. 31

Where: Bloomington Center for the Arts, 1800 W. Old Shakopee Road, Bloomington

Tickets: $65-$40, available at artistrymn.org

Capsule: It might be the light summer entertainment you crave.

Related Articles


Fringe review: Fun in theory, ‘Ping Prov’ is imperfect in front of an audience


Fringe review: ‘Insomnia Dogs’ is an ingenious concept without a resolution


Fringe review: ‘Pineapple Kryptonite’ is a tepid monologue on the mundane


Fringe review: ‘Academonic’ draws audiences into the suspense


Fringe review: ‘Duluth: An Improvised Midwest Murder’ is klutzy and funny