Johnson gets real about funding leverage as shutdown looms

posted in: Politics | 0

Speaker Mike Johnson told House Republicans on a private conference call Friday night that their disunity has ceded leverage to Democrats ahead of the government shutdown deadline next week, according to two people on the call.

Johnson and the House’s top Republican funding negotiators plan to spend the weekend trying to reach a final agreement with Democrats on the first four spending bills set to expire at midnight on March 1, now a week away. As the speaker works to defeat policy demands from Democrats and secure GOP priorities in those measures, he acknowledged that his deal-making power is undermined by the fact that a contingent of House Republicans now routinely blocks GOP measures from being debated with a simple-majority bar for passage.

“Some members in our conference said it was as OK to take down a rule,” the speaker told his conference, referring to the rule that tees up regular floor debate on a bill, according to a source on the call.

Johnson stressed to Republicans that he feels optimistic about meeting next week’s deadline for passing the first four bills, which fund the departments of Agriculture, Energy, Transportation and Veterans Affairs. But in an acknowledgment of the major disagreements still plaguing spending talks, he said a partial government shutdown is possible.

Congressional leaders have been aiming to announce a deal as soon as Sunday night, which could include a package of some or all of those measures and a possible short-term funding extension that would buy more time for negotiations on the rest of the dozen bills, which present even bigger challenges. One possible date floated for that stopgap is March 22.

Top funding negotiators in both parties have long acknowledged what the speaker bemoaned Friday night about whipping support for final funding bills. House Republican leaders are expected to need overwhelming support from Democrats to pass the spending measures at a threshold of nearly 290 votes, the two-thirds bar required if the majority skips the typical rules for floor debate.

The same conservatives who have been tanking GOP procedural votes are calling on Johnson to forge ahead with a funding strategy that would trigger tens of billions of dollars in cuts to non-defense programs.

According to a source on the Friday night conference call, Rep. Chip Roy (R-Texas) pressed the speaker to insist on a stopgap through the end of the fiscal year. Unless Congress turns off budget caps baked into last year’s debt limit deal, a long-term patch would force cuts to domestic programs while forgoing billions of dollars in defense funding the speaker negotiated in the

Man imprisoned for 2009 mother-son slaying as juvenile now eligible for parole after resentencing

posted in: News | 0

An imprisoned man’s long legal fight for a lighter sentence in the 2008 stabbing deaths of a mother and her young son in south Minneapolis has ended with the now-32-year-old resentenced Friday to two concurrent life sentences with the possibility of parole.

The resentencing of Brian Lee Flowers follows an agreement he reached with prosecutors this week and means he is now eligible for parole because of changes to federal and state law regarding juvenile sentences.

Flowers, who was 16 at the time of the killings, and his 17-year-old accomplice, Stafon Edward Thompson, were convicted in 2009 of two counts of first-degree murder for the brutal slayings of 36-year-old Katricia Daniels and her 10-year-old son, Robert Shepard.

The Minneapolis teens were sentenced to two consecutive life terms, without the possibility of parole.

Katricia Daniels (left) and Robert Shepard

The murders were particularly gruesome: Daniels had been stabbed or cut at least 193 times, a pathologist testified at Thompson’s jury trial. The child was stabbed and cut more than 30 times, his head bashed with a television set.

Flowers first challenged the sentence shortly after the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in 2012 that it is unconstitutional to sentence juveniles to mandatory life sentences without the possibility of release.

Flowers sought to be resentenced retroactively by the state district court.

2008 jail booking photo of Brian Lee Flowers (Courtesy of the Hennepin County Sheriff’s Office)

What ensued was a decade-long fight by Flowers and his attorneys, who’ve argued he had a lesser role in the killings than Thompson. They also cited several changes to federal and Minnesota law, and got favorable decisions in his case by the state’s highest court in 2010 and 2018.

Agreement with prosecutors

Flowers and prosecutors reached the agreement on Wednesday. Hennepin County District Judge William Koch accepted it on Friday and resentenced Flowers to the two concurrent sentences of life in prison with the possibility of supervised release.

In turn, Flowers agreed to dismiss his motion for a new trial and to cease his post-conviction litigation.

The agreement means Flowers will be eligible for parole about four years earlier than under the consecutive life sentences, according to prosecutors.

That’s because state legislators changed the law regarding juvenile sentences. Now, someone serving one or more concurrent life sentences for a crime committed as a juvenile is eligible for supervised release after 15 years. For someone serving consecutive life sentences, eligibility begins after 20 years. The law applies retroactively to all individuals sentenced for crimes committed as a juvenile.

2008 jail booking photo of Stafon Edward Thompson (Courtesy of the Hennepin County Sheriff’s Office)

Because Flowers has already served more than 15 years, he is eligible for a parole hearing now. Scheduling is up to the Minnesota Department of Corrections.

Flowers’ legal team, which includes Perry Moriearty, a University of Minnesota Law School professor, and Brad Colbert, a professor at Mitchell-Hamline School of Law, issued a statement Friday on behalf of their client.

“(Flowers) is grateful that both the State and the Court have recognized his youth and — as did the Minnesota Supreme Court — his lesser culpability in these events,” the statement read, in part.

Ramsey County’s role

Due to a potential conflict of interest, the Hennepin County attorney’s office asked the Ramsey County attorney’s office in April to assume representation of the state.

The state Supreme Court determined in 2010 that Flowers’ role in the murders was “far less” than his co-defendant, Ramsey County Attorney John Choi said in a Friday statement.

“We came to the same conclusion after reviewing this case for the past ten months,” Choi said, “and therefore resolved this case in a manner that reflected his lesser culpability, achieved an end to the litigation, and recognized the reality that the distinction between consecutive and concurrent sentences for Mr. Flowers was small due to retroactive changes in the law made by the Minnesota Legislature in 2023.”

According to the agreement, the attorney’s office spoke with several surviving family members of the victims and told them how the the new law applies Flowers. The family members told prosecutors they do not support Flowers’ concurrent sentences.

“It is impossible to overstate the gravity of the trauma, grief, and loss caused by the murders of Katricia Daniels and Robert Shephard,” the statement by Flowers’ attorneys read. “Brian takes full responsibility for and deeply regrets his role in the events of that night.”

Related Articles

Crime & Public Safety |


Inmate dies in Brainerd jail, Crow Wing County sheriff says

Crime & Public Safety |


Trump’s lawyers call for dismissal of classified documents case, citing presidential immunity

Crime & Public Safety |


Woodbury grad party shooting: Gunman who fired shot that killed boy, 14, pleads guilty to unintentional murder

Crime & Public Safety |


Man with mental illness acquitted in the killing of his mother at St. Paul home

Crime & Public Safety |


Burnsville man fired more than 100 rifle rounds in incident that killed 2 officers, firefighter, BCA says

3 classic comfort food recipes you should master

posted in: Society | 0

Beth Dooley | (TNS) Star Tribune

Though I’m getting older, my favorite dishes never do. When I reach for the tattered recipe cards and read my grandmother’s faded script, I hear her telling me to “tie back my hair and wash my hands, for pity sake.” And as the kitchen fills with warm roasting, sizzling and simmering scents, though I’m by myself I’m never truly alone.

Let’s be clear, I don’t want to go back in time. I just want to conjure the sense of my grandmother and other cooks I’ve learned from and loved. However, the actual recipes might not be as delicious now as they were then — our palates evolve and ingredients change over time. As a child, I craved my mother’s mac and cheese, but I’m not going to use processed cheese on good pasta or stir condensed milk into my soup. Those pantry staples that served her generation have seen their days.

I’m also not a professional chef. Rather, I’ve been a home cook for nearly 50 years, and I don’t think I’ll ever tire of that. I still love every slow turn of a wooden spoon, the scent of sizzling onions, the whack and thump of kneading dough. I haven’t mastered many culinary techniques; I just get satisfaction from doing the most basic dish meticulously and well. It’s good to slow down, engage my senses and relax my mind after a busy day at the screen. That might mean chopping herbs or lemons by hand, not with the food processor, so I can breathe in their bright smells.

When re-creating well-loved meals, perfection is not the ideal. The wobbly pie crust whispers of foraging summer berries, the delightfully crisp sugar cookies were an accident because I forgot to add baking soda to the mix. These are recipes with stories to tell.

Making something nice for dinner does not mean repeating every ingredient and every step over and over again on a kitchen treadmill. Familiarity should be freeing, a license to try a few new tastes and methods and to have fun, to surprise yourself. Trust your judgment, hone your skills.

The recipes in my “favorites” collection are essential to the way I live now. I know them by heart, but tweak them every time. I’ve streamlined steps, changed ingredients, switched up herbs and spices. I keep these three recipes — mac and cheese, meatloaf and tomato soup — in rotation for those blustery winter nights when hunger and loneliness rattle the kitchen windows.

These old friends are familiar but never quite the same. I’m always looking for ways to lighten and brighten and freshen things up. Just as with all things in our lives, cooking should not stand still.

Meatloaf Muffins with Mashed Potato Topping

Makes 6 (3 1/2-inch muffins)

These meatloaf muffins bake in half the time of a loaf. Any extras may be frozen for a later quick dinner for one. You might try a mix of different ground meats — beef, pork, lamb. Here, a little chopped pancetta gives it a bump. Don’t skimp on the mashed potatoes! Serve with a tart green salad or steamed broccoli on the side. Feel free to add red pepper flakes or ground chili, a shot of Tabasco or sautéed spinach. From Beth Dooley.

2 to 3 tbsp. butter, softened
1 1/2 lb. ground beef (or mix of beef, pork, lamb)
1/4 c. diced pancetta, optional
1/2 c. fresh breadcrumbs
1/4 c. ketchup
1/4 c. Worcestershire sauce
1/4 c. diced onion
1 clove garlic, minced
1 large egg
2 tsp. coarse salt
1 tsp. freshly ground black pepper
Mashed potatoes (see recipe)

Directions

Preheat the oven to 350 degrees. Generously butter 6 (3 1/2-inch) muffin cups.

In a large mixing bowl, work together the ground beef, pancetta, breadcrumbs, ketchup, Worcestershire sauce, onion, garlic, egg, salt and pepper. Pack into the muffin tins. Bake until the meat is browned and crusty on top and cooked through, about 30 to 40 minutes. A digital thermometer should read 165 degrees when inserted in the center. Remove pan from oven and set the heat to broil.

Mound the mashed potatoes on top of each muffin, run under the broiler until the tops are nicely speckled brown. Serve with additional mashed potatoes on the side.

Mashed Potatoes

Serves 4 to 6.

From Beth Dooley.

2 lb. baking potatoes (Idaho or Russet), peeled and cut into quarters
Salt
1/4 c. (1/2 stick) butter
3/4 c. half and half or whole milk
Freshly ground black pepper to taste

Directions

Put the potatoes into a large pot and add enough water to cover them by 4 inches. Season with salt. Set over high heat, bring to a boil, reduce the heat and simmer until the potatoes are fork tender, about 30 minutes.

Drain the potatoes, return to the pot, and mash them with the butter and half and half until smooth and creamy. Taste and season with more salt and pepper as desired.

Mac and Cheese

Serves 6.

Inspired by a New York Times recipe, this recipe relies on ricotta cheese for its creaminess. There’s no need to pre-boil the noodles; they cook in the milk and cheese, absorbing all the flavor to be gooey and rich. Elbow pasta is the traditional shape, but fusilli tends to hold the cheese in all its nooks and crannies. From Beth Dooley.

1/4 c. (1/2 stick) butter
1 c. whole milk ricotta cheese
2 c. whole milk or half and half
Generous shot Tabasco sauce
Generous pinch ground nutmeg
Generous pinch coarse salt
Generous pinch black pepper
1 lb. sharp cheddar cheese, grated, plus a little more for the topping
1/2 lb. uncooked elbow pasta or other pasta
1/4 c. panko breadcrumbs

Directions

Preheat the oven to 350 degrees. Generously butter a 9-inch (2 quart) baking dish with some of the butter. Cut a piece of aluminum foil large enough to cover the baking dish and butter the dull side.

In the bowl of a food processor, place the ricotta, milk, Tabasco, nutmeg and salt and pepper and purée until smooth. Transfer to a large bowl and stir in the cheese and uncooked pasta. Transfer this to the prepared baking dish and cover tightly with the foil (butter-side down). Bake for 40 minutes.

Remove the foil. Stir the pasta and sprinkle with a little more cheese. Sprinkle with the panko and dot with the remaining butter. Return to the oven and bake until browned, about 25 to 30 minutes. Remove and allow it to rest for 10 minutes before serving.

Classic Tomato Soup

Serves 4.

Deliciously fresh when made with garden tomatoes, this is pure comfort with canned. I like the fire-roasted tomatoes for their bits of char and a little smoke. You can hold off on the cream and just add a little more stock for a lighter soup. Serve with grilled cheese sandwiches for dunking. From Beth Dooley.

2 tbsp. butter
1/4 c. diced shallot
1/2 c. diced onion
Salt and freshly ground black pepper, to taste
3 c. (28-oz. can) diced tomatoes with juices
1 tbsp. chopped fresh thyme or 1 tsp. dried
2 1/2 c. chicken or vegetable stock, or more if needed
1/2 c. heavy cream
Minced fresh parsley, for garnish

Directions

Melt the butter in a large, deep saucepan over medium-low heat. Add the shallot and onion, season with salt and pepper, and cook until they soften. Stir in the tomatoes and thyme, reduce the heat and simmer for about 10 minutes. Stir in the stock and cream. Taste and adjust the seasoning and add more stock if needed. Serve garnished with the parsley.

____

Beth Dooley is the author of “The Perennial Kitchen.” Find her at bethdooleyskitchen.com.

©2024 StarTribune. Visit at startribune.com. Distributed by Tribune Content Agency, LLC.

Supreme Court faces continued strong disapproval, poll shows

posted in: News | 0

A majority of adults still disapprove of the job the Supreme Court is doing, according to a new poll, and opposition to the 2022 Dobbs decision remains strong among those surveyed.

A poll from Marquette Law School released Tuesday found that 40 percent of adults approve of the Supreme Court’s actions, while 60 percent disapprove. Those approval numbers mark a slight downtick after remaining between 41 and 47 percent approving throughout 2023 in previous Marquette Law School polls.

The court faced a low point of 38 percent approval in July 2022, about a month after justices voted to take away the constitutional right to abortion by overturning Roe v. Wade. Public approval of the court has not risen higher than 47 percent approving since then, according to Marquette Law School polls, compared to approval that reached 66 percent in mid-2020.

Support from Democrats has especially dropped in recent years, with 60 percent of surveyed Democrats approving of the court in September 2020 and just 27 percent approving in February 2024.

Americans have split opinions on the case about the Colorado Supreme Court’s decision to remove former President Donald Trump from ballots ahead of the 2024 election, according to the poll released Tuesday. Of the respondents who have opinions on the matter, 50 percent favor the court overturning the Colorado decision to disqualify Trump, and 50 percent oppose it.

Marquette Law School conducted the poll between Feb. 5 and 15 by surveying 1,003 adults across the country online with a margin of error of plus-or-minus 4.3 percentage points.