Winter looks to return to Twin Cities with snow Thursday, 2nd wave this weekend

posted in: News | 0

It may officially be spring but winter isn’t giving up yet.

“We’re expecting sort of two separate waves of wintry weather,” said Brennan Dettmann, a meteorologist with the Twin Cities National Weather Service.

The first is expected Thursday evening with snowfall starting between 6 and 7 p.m. and lasting into Friday morning. A band of 2 to 5 inches of snow is expected to fall in the Twin Cities with more to the north.

“It could impact your morning commute,” Dettmann said.

Further north of the metro area may see even more snow, he said. The forecast calls for highs in the 30s for the Twin Cities this weekend.

The second wave is expected to begin on Saturday evening with snowfall into Sunday. The precipitation may turn into rain from Sunday night into Monday, potentially making for slippery roads conditions.

Dettmann said the snowfall this weekend is forecast to “be heavy, wet snow, difficult to shovel.” Winds also will be high with gusts up to 30 mph on Sunday.

Travelers should keep an eye on the forecast as the weekend approaches, he said. Meteorologists will have more detailed forecasts in days to come.

“This winter has been anything but typical with how low the snowfall as been,” Dettman said. “You can still get bigger storms in March and April. We’re definitely not out of it yet.”

Related Articles

News |


No Labels struggles to recruit US presidential nominee

News |


A new $16,000 postpartum depression drug is here. How will insurers handle it?

News |


Intermittent fasting linked to heart risks in research surprise

News |


During the Israel-Hamas war, Jews will soon celebrate Purim — one of their most joyous holidays

News |


Jared Kushner, Trump’s son-in-law, praises ‘very valuable’ potential of Gaza’s ‘waterfront property’

No Labels struggles to recruit US presidential nominee

posted in: News | 0

Billy House | Bloomberg News (TNS)

WASHINGTON — No Labels founding chairman Joe Lieberman said the centrist group has faced a “daunting” struggle to recruit a candidate to mount a third-party run for U.S. president.

Related Articles

National Politics |


Election misinformation is a problem in any language. But some gets more attention than others

National Politics |


Biden tells Latino voters they’re the reason he defeated Trump in 2020 and says, ‘I need you back’

National Politics |


Judge clears way for Trump to appeal ruling keeping Fani Willis on Georgia 2020 election case

National Politics |


How Texas’ plans to arrest migrants for illegal entry will work

National Politics |


Trump asks Supreme Court to dismiss case charging him with plotting to overturn 2020 election

Lieberman, a former Democratic senator who left the party to become an independent, said the group is in talks with “a couple of quality candidates” whom he declined to identify, and would make a decision within weeks.

“I believe it is going to happen,” Lieberman said in an interview Tuesday, but added, “It’s possible — it’s happened before — we won’t be able to find candidates.”

A series of candidates floated as potential nominees for the group have rejected the idea, including former U.N. Ambassador Nikki Haley, former Maryland Governor Larry Hogan and most recently, former Georgia Lieutenant Governor Geoff Duncan, all Republicans. Retiring Democratic West Virginia Senator Joe Manchin also said he wasn’t interested.

No Labels recently announced a 12-member panel, which includes Lieberman, to make a recommendation on potential nominees.

©2024 Bloomberg L.P. Visit bloomberg.com. Distributed by Tribune Content Agency, LLC.

A new $16,000 postpartum depression drug is here. How will insurers handle it?

posted in: News | 0

By April Dembosky, KQED and KFF Health News

A much-awaited treatment for postpartum depression, zuranolone, hit the market in December, promising an accessible and fast-acting medication for a debilitating illness. But most private health insurers have yet to publish criteria for when they will cover it, according to a new analysis of insurance policies.

The lack of guidance could limit use of the drug, which is both novel — it targets hormone function to relieve symptoms instead of the brain’s serotonin system, as typical antidepressants do — and expensive, at $15,900 for the 14-day pill regimen.

Lawyers, advocates, and regulators are watching closely to see how insurance companies will shape policies for zuranolone because of how some handled its predecessor, an intravenous form of the same drug called brexanolone, which came on the market in 2019. Many insurers required patients to try other, cheaper medications first — known as the fail-first approach — before they could be approved for brexanolone, which was shown in early trials reviewed by the FDA to provide relief within days. Typical antidepressants take four to six weeks to take effect.

“We’ll have to see if insurers cover this drug and what fail-first requirements they put in” for zuranolone, said Meiram Bendat, a licensed psychotherapist and an attorney who represents patients.

Related Articles

Health |


Operating in the red: Half of rural hospitals lose money, as many cut services

Health |


How the anti-vaccine movement pits parental rights against public health

Health |


F.D. Flam: Do you really want to find out if you’ll get Alzheimer’s?

Health |


Facing public backlash, some health care companies are abandoning hospital deals

Health |


Solar eclipse: Glasses are key, but did you know clothing choice could enhance viewing?

Most health plans have yet to issue any guidelines for zuranolone, and maternal health advocates worry that the few that have are taking a restrictive approach. Some policies require that patients first try and fail a standard antidepressant before the insurer will pay for zuranolone.

In other cases, guidelines require psychiatrists to prescribe it, rather than obstetricians, potentially delaying treatment since OB-GYN practitioners are usually the first medical providers to see signs of postpartum depression.

Advocates are most worried about the lack of coverage guidance.

“If you don’t have a published policy, there is going to be more variation in decision-making that isn’t fair and is less efficient. Transparency is really important,” said Joy Burkhard, executive director of the nonprofit Policy Center for Maternal Mental Health, which commissioned the study.

With brexanolone, which was priced at $34,000 for the three-day infusion, California’s largest insurer, Kaiser Permanente, had such rigorous criteria for prescribing it that experts said the policy amounted to a blanket denial for all patients, according to an NPR investigation in 2021.

KP’s written guidelines required patients to try and fail four medications and electroconvulsive therapy before they would be eligible for brexanolone. Because the drug was approved only for up to six months postpartum, and trials of typical antidepressants take four to six weeks each, the clock would run out before a patient had time to try brexanolone.

An analysis by NPR of a dozen other health plans at the time showed Kaiser Permanente’s policy on brexanolone to be an outlier. Some did require that patients fail one or two other drugs first, but KP was the only one that recommended four.

Miriam McDonald, who developed severe postpartum depression and suicidal ideation after giving birth in late 2019, battled Kaiser Permanente for more than a year to find effective treatment. Her doctors put her on a merry-go-round of medications that didn’t work and often carried unbearable side effects, she said. Her doctors refused to prescribe brexanolone, the only FDA-approved medication specifically for postpartum depression at the time.

“No woman should suffer like I did after having a child,” McDonald said. “The policy was completely unfair. I was in purgatory.”

Miriam McDonald spends time with her 4-year-old son, Nico. McDonald struggled to get care for postpartum depression at Kaiser Permanente, an experience that would lead to significant policy changes by the health care provider. (Keith McDonald/KFF Health News/TNS)

One month after NPR published its investigation, KP overhauled its criteria to recommend that women try just one medication before becoming eligible for brexanolone.

Then, in March 2023, after the federal Department of Labor launched an investigation into the insurer — citing NPR’s reporting — the insurer revised its brexanolone guidelines again, removing all fail-first recommendations, according to internal documents recently obtained by NPR. Patients need only decline a trial of another medication.

“Since brexanolone was first approved for use, more experience and research have added to information about its efficacy and safety,” the insurer said in a statement. “Kaiser Permanente is committed to ensuring brexanolone is available when physicians and patients determine it is an appropriate treatment.”

“Kaiser basically went from having the most restrictive policy to the most robust,” said Burkhard of the Policy Center for Maternal Mental Health. “It’s now a gold standard for the rest of the industry.”

McDonald is hopeful that her willingness to speak out and the subsequent regulatory actions and policy changes for brexanolone will lead Kaiser Permanente and other health plans to set patient-friendly policies for zuranolone.

“This will prevent other women from having to go through a year of depression to find something that works,” she said.

Miriam McDonald spends time with her 4-year-old son, Nico. McDonald struggled to get care for postpartum depression at Kaiser Permanente, an experience that would lead to significant policy changes by the health care provider. (Keith McDonald/KFF Health News/TNS)

Clinicians were excited when the FDA approved zuranolone last August, believing the pill form, taken once a day at home over two weeks, will be more accessible to women compared with the three-day hospital stay for the IV infusion. Many perinatal psychiatrists told NPR it is imperative to treat postpartum depression as quickly as possible to avoid negative effects, including cognitive and social problems in the baby, anxiety or depression in the father or partner, or the death of the mother to suicide, which accounts for up to 20% of maternal deaths.

So far, only one of the country’s six largest private insurers, Centene, has set a policy for zuranolone. It is unclear what criteria KP will set for the new pill. California’s Medicaid program, known as Medi-Cal, has not yet established coverage criteria.

Insurers’ policies for zuranolone will be written at a time when the regulatory environment around mental health treatment is shifting. The U.S. Department of Labor is cracking down on violations of the Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008, which requires insurers to cover psychiatric treatments the same as physical treatments.

Insurers must now comply with stricter reporting and auditing requirements intended to increase patient access to mental health care, which advocates hope will compel health plans to be more careful about the policies they write in the first place.

In California, insurers must also comply with an even broader state mental health parity law from 2021, which requires them to use clinically based, expert-recognized criteria and guidelines in making medical decisions. The law was designed to limit arbitrary or cost-driven denials for mental health treatments and has been hailed as a model for the rest of the country. Much-anticipated regulations for the law are expected to be released this spring and could offer further guidance for insurers in California setting policies for zuranolone.

Miriam McDonald spends time with her 4-year-old son, Nico. McDonald struggled to get care for postpartum depression at Kaiser Permanente, an experience that would lead to significant policy changes by the health care provider. (Keith McDonald/KFF Health News/TNS)

In the meantime, Burkhard said, patients suffering from postpartum depression should not hold back from asking their doctors about zuranolone. Insurers can still grant access to the drug on a case-by-case basis before they formalize their coverage criteria.

“Providers shouldn’t be deterred from prescribing zuranolone,” Burkhard said.

KFF Health News, formerly known as Kaiser Health News (KHN), is a national newsroom that produces in-depth journalism about health issues and is one of the core operating programs of KFF — the independent source for health policy research, polling and journalism.

©2024 KFF Health News. Distributed by Tribune Content Agency, LLC.

Intermittent fasting linked to heart risks in research surprise

posted in: News | 0

By Marthe Fourcade, Bloomberg News

The safety of intermittent fasting, a popular strategy to lose weight by limiting food intake to certain times, was called into question by a surprise finding from research presented at a medical meeting.

Limiting mealtimes to a period of just eight hours a day was linked to a 91% increase in risk of death from heart disease in the study, which was released on Monday in Chicago. The American Heart Association published only an abstract, leaving scientists speculating about details of the study protocol. The study was reviewed by other experts prior to its release, according to the AHA.

Lifestyle interventions aimed at weight loss have come under scrutiny as a new generation of drugs help people shed pounds. Some doctors questioned the study’s findings, saying they could have been skewed by differences — such as underlying heart health — between the fasting patients and the comparison group, whose members consumed food over a daily period of 12 to 16 hours.

Related Articles

Health |


Operating in the red: Half of rural hospitals lose money, as many cut services

Health |


How the anti-vaccine movement pits parental rights against public health

Health |


F.D. Flam: Do you really want to find out if you’ll get Alzheimer’s?

Health |


Facing public backlash, some health care companies are abandoning hospital deals

Health |


Solar eclipse: Glasses are key, but did you know clothing choice could enhance viewing?

“Time-restricted eating is popular as a means of reducing calorie intake,” Keith Frayn, emeritus professor of human metabolism at the University of Oxford, said in a statement to the U.K. Science Media Center. “This work is very important in showing that we need long-term studies on the effects of this practice. But this abstract leaves many questions unanswered.”

The researchers, led by Victor Zhong of the Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, analyzed data from about 20,000 adults included in the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey.

The study looked at answers to questionnaires along with death data from 2003 through 2019. Because it relied in part on forms that required patients to recall what they ate over two days, scientists said there was room for potential inaccuracies. About half of the patients were men and the mean age was 48.

It wasn’t clear how long the patients kept up the intermittent fasting. Zhong did not immediately reply to an email seeking comment. The abstract was presented at the AHA’s Lifestyle Scientific Sessions meeting in Chicago.

©2024 Bloomberg L.P. Visit bloomberg.com. Distributed by Tribune Content Agency, LLC.