Jason Matheson introduces new sidekick Falen Bonsett as Kendall Mark starts MyTalk job

posted in: News | 0

It was a changing of the guard Monday, as Jason Matheson introduced KDWB afternoon DJ Falen Bonsett as his new sidekick on “The Jason Show.” Bonsett replaces Kendall Mark, who began her new job Monday afternoon co-hosting the former “Lori and Julia” afternoon timeslot with Brittany Arneson on MyTalk 107.1.

Matheson opened his show, which airs at 10 a.m. weekdays on Fox 9, with a prerecorded reenactment of the famous shower scene from the ’80s soap opera “Dallas” with Bonsett in place of Bobby Ewing.

“Friends, it’s a great thrill to tell you that Falen is our new sidekick,” Matheson said. “After an exhaustive seven day search, we interviewed two people …”

“I barely made the cut,” Bonsett added. “I’m being paid in Sun Chips and I’m excited.”

Bonsett is a familiar face to viewers of “The Jason Show,” which also airs in several other markets including Seattle and Chicago. She previously sat in as a guest co-host, most recently last fall when Mark was on maternity leave. On KDWB, Bonsett has earned a reputation for her quick wit and sometimes crass sense of humor.

FROM 2013: KDWB’s Falen Bonsett named one of radio’s hottest women

Mark had been on “The Jason Show” since 2019 and also worked as a morning traffic reporter at Fox 9. She left both jobs to join Arneson at MyTalk.

Longtime friends Lori Barghini and Julia Cobbs were among the first hosts hired when MyTalk launched in 2002. They surprised listeners in March when they announced that they were ending their popular “Lori and Julia” talk show. They made the decision due to Barghini’s desire for more free time as well as the rigors of producing the show for more than 20 years.

After a months-long goodbye to listeners, Barghini and Cobbs filled the Fillmore Minneapolis with well wishers for their final broadcast on June 27. Over three hours, the hosts and guests shared both memories and tears as the audience cheered them on.

RELATED: Lori and Julia made magic together on the radio and will be missed

In an interview with the Pioneer Press last month, Mark said she knew she had big shoes to fill: “Everyone knows Lori and Julia. It’s intimidating. Usually you want to be the person who takes over after the person who takes over, if you know what I mean.”

Arneson, who was a frequent MyTalk fill-in host, and Mark opened what is now called “Brittany and Kendall” at 3 p.m. Monday with a brief tribute to the hosts they’re replacing. Arneson promised to follow advice from Barghini and Cobbs and employ “kindness, humility and knowledge” as a host.

From there, the pair went on discuss the new job (they both wore dresses for the first day), their personal lives and celebrity gossip, much like their predecessors.

“We’ve got three hours to fill,” Mark said with a laugh.

Related Articles

Movies & TV |


What does ‘The Bear’ get wrong about its big Chicago Tribune restaurant review? From the real food critic

Movies & TV |


Eddie Murphy reprises famous role in ‘Beverly Hills Cop: Axel F’

Movies & TV |


What to stream: Dive into earlier movies of scream queen Mia Goth

Movies & TV |


Q&A: Class and social status in the kitchen and ‘The Bear’

Movies & TV |


‘Fox & Friends’ visits West Fargo diner as Gov. Doug Burgum lands on ‘short list’ for Trump’s vice president pick

Victim objects as former Ramsey County public defender avoids prison on sexual misconduct charges

posted in: News | 0

A former Ramsey County public defender convicted of criminal sexual misconduct charges avoided prison time Monday in a sentence that his victim called “extremely lenient.”

Adam Kujawa, 38, was sentenced in Washington County District Court to four years of probation and 90 days in jail, which can be served on electronic home monitoring, after he struck a plea deal and admitted to amended charges stemming from sexual misconduct on his boat on Forest Lake in May 2021.

Adam Kujawa (Courtesy of Ramsey County Sheriff’s Office)

Kujawa had worked as a Ramsey County public defender for many years, but resigned Feb. 28, a day after pleading guilty to felony criminal sexual predatory conduct and to gross misdemeanor fifth-degree nonconsensual sexual conduct. He had entered an Alford plea, meaning he maintains innocence while acknowledging the state likely has enough evidence to convict him.

Judge Siv Mjanger followed the terms of Kujawa’s plea deal and stayed nearly four years of prison time for four years. He must register as a predatory offender for 10 years and undergo a psychosexual evaluation and follow the recommendations.

The woman, now 38, said in court in a prepared statement read by a victim advocate that she was the victim of Kujawa’s “psychological, physical and sexual abuse” for more than three years, “something that words cannot ever capture.”

“He has taken so many things that I love, and he has taken my time, my safety, my freedom and me away from me and those who love me,” she said. “I am a completely different person as a result of his abuse.”

Prosecutors have previously called the plea deal a “global resolution” because it settled criminal cases in three other Minnesota counties alleging similar conduct by Kujawa involving the woman.

Following Kujawa’s sentencing, Washington County Attorney Kevin Magnuson said in a written statement that sexual conduct cases are among the “most important and most difficult cases” his office prosecutes.

“Sexual assaults take an enormous and terrible toll on victims,” he continued. “I hope the resolution of this case will provide some measure of closure to the victim. I am pleased that Kujawa has been held accountable for his crime through two criminal convictions, incarceration and registration as a predatory offender.”

Other charges dismissed

Washington County prosecutors filed two felony cases against Kujawa in December 2021 — one alleging the Forest Lake incident, the other for alleged sexual assaults at his St. Paul apartment in September of that year.

Washington County handled the second case for the Ramsey County Attorney’s Office due to perceived conflicts of interest. Mjanger dismissed the case last year, citing insufficient evidence to support the charge of third-degree criminal sexual conduct by means of force or coercion.

Related Articles

Crime & Public Safety |


Body found in Mississippi River ID’d as woman reported missing from Minneapolis

Crime & Public Safety |


St. Croix River drowning victim identified as Minneapolis dancer

Crime & Public Safety |


St. Paul police: In fatal crash and fire, fireworks exploding in vehicle made reaching driver difficult

Crime & Public Safety |


Alec Baldwin arrives at courthouse for pretrial hearing over fatal shooting of cinematographer

Crime & Public Safety |


St. Paul man gets 7-year sentence in shooting that injured 3 in home

The original felony charge in the Washington County criminal complaint also alleged third-degree criminal sexual conduct by means of force or coercion. According to the complaint, a witness reported to police in November 2021 that around May 15, while on the boat, Kujawa grabbed the victim by the hips and waist and pulled her toward himself. The witness said the victim told him “no” and to stop what he was doing. Kujawa placed his hands up the victim’s dress at least five times, the witness said. The victim told police that she would try to get away, but he would pull her back.

In the Ramsey County case, the woman alleged that on Sept. 29, 2021, she had been raped by Kujawa twice at his Grand Avenue apartment over the prior two days. She told police that she was in a romantic relationship with him for four years, the complaint said.

Under the February plea deal, the Cook County Attorney’s Office dismissed its case that charged Kujawa with four counts of third-degree criminal sexual conduct by means of force or coercion. The charges were filed last September after the woman alleged that Kujawa forced her to have sex on four occasions over three days at a Lutsen ski resort in February 2020.

Also, the Aitkin County Attorney’s Office agreed not to file a criminal complaint it had drafted charging Kujawa with first-degree criminal sexual conduct and “lesser offenses” related to an alleged incident on Feb. 29, 2020, according to the plea petition.

Meanwhile, the Crow Wing County Attorney’s Office considered filing a case against Kujawa but declined charges, according to prosecutors.

Special treatment?

At Monday’s hearing, the woman said Kujawa “has stolen my self-worth. Seven years of my life. My safety, privacy, intimacy, self-confidence, belief in the justice system, and my own voice in this world.”

As she did after the plea deal, she maintained that Kujawa was given special treatment because of his past jobs, which included a stint as an assistant attorney general, and that she “was never consulted, never given a chance to react or provide my input.”

“Once again my voice was squashed, just as Adam said it would be,” she said.

Assistant Washington County Attorney Wade Kish addressed her claim, saying: “As I’ve stated previously in court, there were many different opportunities in meetings in which this negotiation was presented to (the victim), who had a chance to react and respond. I should also advise the court, as you are well aware, that no less than four counties have signed off on this plea negotiation.”

The victim’s assertions of preferential treatment “are just simply inaccurate,” said Kujawa’s attorney, David Lundgren, adding his client is a “good man” and that he had many supporters in court with him.

Afterward, a teary-eyed Kujawa was surrounded outside the courtroom by his parents and several of his former colleagues from the Second Judicial District Public Defender’s Office. They declined to comment, as did Kujawa.

Meanwhile, Kujawa’s future as an attorney is unknown.

Susan Humiston, director of the state’s Office Of Lawyers Responsibility, the governing body for attorneys, said Monday they have an open investigation into Kujawa’s criminal conduct. Humiston said she cannot speak of Kujawa’s open case, adding that, in general terms, conduct by attorneys and the potential punishment, which can include disbarment, is imposed by the state Supreme Court.

Related Articles

Crime & Public Safety |


Fake therapist fooled hundreds online until she died, state records say

Crime & Public Safety |


Americans are split over whether Trump should face prison in the hush money case, poll finds

Crime & Public Safety |


Alec Baldwin arrives at courthouse for pretrial hearing over fatal shooting of cinematographer

Crime & Public Safety |


St. Paul man gets 7-year sentence in shooting that injured 3 in home

Crime & Public Safety |


Despite what some politicians say, crime rates are decreasing

Here’s what to know about Boeing agreeing to plead guilty to fraud in 737 Max crashes

posted in: News | 0

By DAVID KOENIG and ALANNA DURKIN RICHER

Boeing will have a felony conviction if it follows through on an agreement with prosecutors to plead guilty to fraud in connection with approval of its 737 Max before two of the planes crashed, killing 346 people off the coast of Indonesia and in Ethiopia.

The American aerospace giant has apparently made the calculation that admitting to a crime is better than fighting the charge and enduring a long public trial.

The plea deal is not yet a sure thing, however.

Relatives of some of the passengers who died have indicated they will ask a federal judge in Texas to throw out the agreement, which they say is too lenient considering the lives that were lost less. They want a trial, they want a huge fine, and they want Boeing leaders to face charges.

In a legal filing late Sunday — minutes before a midnight deadline — the Justice Department disclosed the agreement and said the fraud charge was “the most serious readily provable offense” it could bring against Boeing. Prosecutors say Boeing will pay another $243.6 million fine, matching a fine it paid in 2021 for the same crime.

The Justice Department says a conviction for fraud will hold Boeing accountable for “misstatements” it made to regulators who certified the 737 Max in 2017. The crashes took place less than five months apart in 2018 and 2019.

The company still faces investigations into the blowout of a panel from an Alaska Airlines Max in January, increased oversight by the Federal Aviation Administration, and accusations from current and former employees about poor workmanship and retaliation against whistleblowers.

Here is what to know about the case and what could be next for Boeing:

What did Boeing admit?

Boeing agreed to plead guilty to conspiracy to defraud the United States — in this case, deceiving the Federal Aviation Administration.

The Justice Department first filed that charge in 2021, but it agreed not to prosecute Boeing if it paid a fine and successfully completed three years of a form of corporate probation under what is called a deferred-prosecution agreement.

In May, however, the department determined that Boeing had not lived up to that agreement, setting in motion the events that led to Sunday’s plea deal.

The plea deal could help Boeing resolve a black mark on its reputation — the felony charge that the American aerospace giant deceived regulators who approved the airplane and the pilot-training requirements to fly it safely.

What did Boeing agree to do?

Boeing will pay another fine, bringing the total to $487.2 million, which the Justice Department says is the legal maximum for the fraud charge. The deal also requires the company to invest at least $455 million to improve safety. It will be on court-supervised probation for three years, and the Justice Department will name an independent monitor to oversee Boeing’s compliance with terms of the plea agreement.

Boeing’s board of directors will be required to meet with families of the victims.

Can the judge block the deal?

Yes. There will be a hearing before U.S. District Judge Reed O’Connor in Fort Worth, Texas. He can accept the agreement, in which case he can’t change terms of Boeing’s punishment. Or he can reject it, which would likely lead to new negotiations between Boeing and prosecutors. A date for the hearing has not been set.

Deals in which the defendant and the federal government agree on a sentence are controversial in legal circles.

“Judges don’t like them. They feel that it usurps their authority,” said Deborah Curtis, a former Justice Department lawyer.

O’Connor, however, has shown deference before to the Justice Department’s power. When families of the crash victims tried to undo the 2021 deferred-prosecution agreement, the judge criticized what he called “Boeing’s egregious criminal conduct” but ruled that he had no authority to overturn the settlement.

How are relatives of the crash victims reacting?

Many are outraged by the agreement.

Zipporah Kuria, a 28-year-old London woman whose father, Joseph, was on the Ethiopian Airlines Max that crashed in March 2019, wanted a trial that she thinks would have unearthed new details about what led up to the crashes.

Now, with the likelihood that there will never be a trial, “the opportunity to continue digging, the opportunity to continue finding out what has gone wrong here and what is wrong, is kind of taken away from us,” Kuria said. “So yet again, they (the victims) have been robbed of their dignity, and we have been robbed of our closure.”

Javier de Luis, an MIT aeronautics lecturer whose sister, Graziella, died in the Ethiopia crash, also finds the punishment for Boeing to be inadequate.

“If you look at the elements that make up this plea agreement, they’re pretty much typical for what you would expect to see in a white-collar fraud investigation – not in the case of a crime that led directly to the deaths of 346 people,” he said.

Nadia Milleron, a Massachusetts resident whose 24-year-old daughter, Samya Stumo, died in the same crash, wants Boeing’s current and previous CEOs to face charges.

“After the Indonesian crash, they knew that something was wrong with this plane, and they knew it could crash,” she said. “They gambled with people’s lives, and they are gambling right now.”

What effect would a conviction have on Boeing?

Boeing’s business has never fully recovered from the crashes. After the renewed scrutiny that followed the Alaska Airlines incident, the company failed to book any new orders for the Max in April and May. It has fallen even farther behind European rival Airbus in production and deliveries of new planes, which means less revenue is coming in.

All of this is happening while Boeing looks for a new CEO to replace David Calhoun, who says he will step down at the end of the year.

That said, the share price of the company’s stock rose slightly Monday.

Will Boeing lose government contracts?

Probably not.

Government contractors can be suspended or disbarred for criminal convictions, but agencies generally have leeway to grant exceptions.

Pentagon press secretary Maj. Gen. Pat Ryder said the Justice Department notified the Defense Department about Boeing’s plea deal.

The Defense Department “will assess the company’s remediation plans and agreement with the Department of Justice to make a determination as to what steps are necessary and appropriate to protect the federal government,” Ryder said.

In 2006, the Air Force cited “compelling national interest” to let Boeing keep competing for contracts even after the company admitted charges that included using stolen information to win a space-launch contract and paying a $615 million fine.

Does the plea affect other investigations into Boeing?

It would only resolve the fraud charge filed after the two deadly crashes. The FBI told passengers on the Alaska Airline Max that suffered a panel blowout while flying over Oregon that they might be victims of a crime.

The National Transportation Safety Board is also investigating that incident, and the Federal Aviation Administration is looking into Boeing’s manufacturing quality.

What happened in the crashes?

Boeing added new flight-control software to the Max that could push the nose of the plane down if a sensor indicated the plane could be approaching an aerodynamic stall. It didn’t initially tell pilots or airlines about the software, known by the acronym MCAS.

The system activated before both crashes based on faulty readings for the single sensor on each plane, according to investigations of the Oct. 29, 2018, crash of a Lion Air Max off the coast of Indonesia and the March 10, 2019, crash of an Ethiopian Airlines Max near Addis Ababa. Other factors contributed to the Lion Air crash, and the Ethiopian pilots were aware of MCAS but still couldn’t regain control after the nose began pitching down without their input.

___

Koenig reported from Dallas and Richer reported from Washington. Haleluya Hadero in South Bend, Indiana, Cathy Bussewitz in New York, and Tara Copp in Washington contributed to this report.

The White House faces many questions about Biden’s health and medical history. Here are some answers

posted in: Politics | 0

By JOSH BOAK and ZEKE MILLER

WASHINGTON (AP) — President Joe Biden’s terrible performance at the June 27 presidential debate has raised concerns about his age, health and ability to lead the federal government.

Administration officials have blamed his confused and at times indecipherable answers at the debate with Republican Donald Trump on a head cold, jet lag and poor preparation at Camp David. But at 81, Biden has found his health to be a key issue for many voters going into November’s election. White House press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre tried to address questions about the president’s health at Monday’s news briefing.

How often does the president see a doctor?

Biden has extensive yearly physical exams, Jean-Pierre said. She added that most Americans don’t understand the extent of the medical care provided to the president, as many people are lucky if they get to see their doctors once or twice a year. By contrast, the president’s medical unit is “just steps down from the residence” at the White House. “A couple times a week,” Biden does a “verbal check-in with his doctor while he’s exercising,” Jean-Pierre said, adding that he had a check-in on Monday.

There has been confusion as to whether Biden saw his doctor about his cold after the presidential debate on June 27. The White House initially said there was no medical exam, but it later said there was a “short verbal check-in” and it was determined that no exam was needed.

Has the president seen a neurologist?

“He has seen a neurologist three times,” said Jean-Pierre. “Not more than that.”

The White House spokesperson repeated the phrase “three times” in 17 instances during the Monday briefing. She stressed that all three meetings with a neurologist were tied to the president’s annual physical exams. But Jean-Pierre declined to say where Biden had seen the neurologist — whether the visits were at Walter Reed National Military Medical Center or elsewhere. “I don’t have anything to state as to location,” she said.

Have Biden’s physical exams found signs of Parkinson’s or other neurological diseases?

Not according to the most recent doctor’s letter, issued in February after Biden’s last physical. Jean-Pierre cited that document Monday in response to reporters’ questions.

That letter said “an extremely detailed neurologic exam was again reassuring” in that there were no findings consistent with a stroke, multiple sclerosis, Parkinson’s or ascending lateral sclerosis. The letter added that no tremors or “motor weakness” were detected. Written by Biden’s physician, Dr. Kevin O’Connor, the letter added that Biden “demonstrates excellent fine motor dexterity.”

Why has a neurologist specializing in Parkinson’s visited the White House?

Visitor logs show that Dr. Kevin Cannard, a neurologist who has conducted research into Parkinson’s, went to the White House eight times between July 2023 and this past March.

Jean-Pierre declined to confirm the name of the doctor or say why he was going to the White House. She told reporters this was due to security reasons and noted that the White House medical unit treats more people than just the president. “There are thousands of military personnel who come on to this White House,” Jean-Pierre said. “Many of them get the care from the White House medical unit and so we need to be super careful.”

Jean-Pierre encouraged the public to “connect the dots.”

According to a person familiar with the matter, Cannard makes roughly monthly visits to the White House to support the White House Medical Unit. The person spoke on condition of anonymity to discuss private medical matters. Cannard made similar trips during the Obama administration, according to visitor logs, and during the Trump administration according to a person familiar with the matter.

Cannard did have one visit with Biden’s personal physician this January in the White House Residence clinic, weeks before the president’s physical in February.

Could Biden waive his rights and make his full medical records public?

At Monday’s news briefing, Jean-Pierre was asked whether Biden could choose to release his full medical records. She said the president had “shared a comprehensive medical report that is pretty detailed” and in line with what was provided by former Presidents Barack Obama and George W. Bush. Sen. John McCain, in 2008, allowed reporters to review more than 1,100 pages of his medical records when he was running for president at 71, which would have made him the oldest elected president at the time.