Clearing the Air

posted in: News | 0

Most people survive the Coronavirus with their kidneys intact. But not 34-year-old Austin resident Vanessa Ramos. 

An experienced community organizer with nonprofits like the Sierra Club, Ramos was healthy and active before she got infected. Then she caught the COVID-19 virus in December 2021, and symptoms lingered through the new year despite her efforts to focus on healing and recovery. 

“I was trying to prioritize my physical health because I couldn’t lift things; I couldn’t open things,” Ramos recalled. “I didn’t understand why I was getting weaker.”

In 2022, she kept getting sick over and over. Colds progressed to sinus infections. She had fluid in her ears after an infection, which required surgery. She even came down with walking pneumonia. 

“I was getting an infection every month—different bacterial infections, different parts of my body,” Ramos said. 

Initially, doctors didn’t dig deeper, perhaps because Ramos was uninsured. As with any chronic, debilitating condition, accessing medical care can be challenging; quality healthcare is most often tied to employment, and those who are chronically ill may no longer be able to work for long stretches of time.

It wasn’t until last year that a nurse finally gave her a diagnosis: long COVID. But by then her kidneys were failing. Ultimately, COVID—which can attack any organ, including the circulatory system itself—was likely the trigger for her to develop a rare form of vasculitis, a chronic swelling of the circulatory system that destroyed the functioning of her kidneys and continues to threaten her heart and lungs. 

Ramos is out of work, spends up to nine hours a day hooked to a dialysis machine, and is awaiting a kidney transplant. 

“We must have this national conversation. How are we going to deal with long COVID?”

The manifestation of Ramos’ long COVID is unique, which isn’t surprising: Experts interviewed for this story said each patient’s illness progresses differently, lending the condition a complexity that frequently hampers diagnosis. At the same time, Ramos is like millions of other Texans who caught the virus and never really got well. According to a 2023 survey from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), up to 15 percent of Texans have experienced some form of long COVID. While COVID-19 is perhaps most well-known for its effects on the respiratory system, it can target almost any part of the body and launch a direct attack on the immune system. Long COVID symptoms most frequently include brain fog, debilitating fatigue after any form of exertion, and extreme dizziness alongside symptoms of dysautonomia (nervous system problems) like vertigo, muscle weakness, and rapid heart rate.   

To the Texans suffering from long COVID—or “long-haulers” as they’re sometimes called—it can seem like the world has moved on and forgotten them. Discussions of COVID mitigation—beyond periodic reminders to get booster shots—have all but disappeared from most public health discussions, and even many medical professionals no longer wear masks after CDC guidelines on masking began to ease in late 2021 and 2022. 

Ziyad Al-Aly, chief of research and development at the Department of Veterans Affairs’ St. Louis Healthcare System and clinical epidemiologist at Washington University in St. Louis, stressed that masks were always meant to be a “stopgap measure” until we developed more sustainable ways of protecting people from getting sick. 

“We lifted the stopgap, and we didn’t develop the permanent solutions, and I think that’s really one of the major failures of the pandemic,” Al-Aly said.

In testimony during a January congressional hearing, Al-Aly compared the impact of long COVID on American lives to that of heart disease and cancer and suggested it could ultimately cost the U.S. economy trillions. 

“Just forgetting about it, sweeping it under the rug is not an option,” he told the Texas Observer. “We must have this national conversation. How are we going to deal with long COVID?”

When W. Michael Brode joined the faculty at Dell Medical School and the UT Health Austin program at the University of Texas at Austin, he worked in the hospital. A board-certified internal medicine specialist, Brode has long been interested in complex conditions that can affect multiple systems in the body. Starting in March 2020, he found himself on the front lines helping the hospital respond to the pandemic and, eventually, its aftermath. He’s currently the director of the UT Health Austin Post-COVID-19 treatment program. 

“It was late 2020 when we noticed long COVID was a thing, and, at that point, we thought this would be a post-ICU clinic and be a transition clinic for people coming out of the hospital,” Brode said.

But rather than treat patients who were transitioning back to everyday life after a hospitalization, they quickly had to pivot to treating those with long COVID. 

“This is really its own illness, lots of times affecting young, healthy people,” he said. “The traditional risk factors from getting sick and in the hospital with COVID are certainly different than developing long COVID.”

While hospitalization is a risk factor for developing long COVID, most of the patients Brode sees in his clinic were never hospitalized for COVID. This was true for Ramos and others we spoke with. 

“It seems to be less about people’s underlying risk factors and more about their immune system, how their body reacts to this inflammation and activation from the virus,” he said.

A majority of the patients Brode sees are women, who he noted are most at risk for autoimmune diseases.

Al-Aly said those who suffer from long COVID can be divided into two categories. One type of patient, like those Brode described, suffers from brain fog, dysautonomia, and extreme exhaustion that’s referred to as “post-exertional malaise,” or PEM. Others are more likely to experience significant organ damage from COVID, which can occur in essentially any major system. Those in the latter group are often older or have preexisting conditions that may have left them more susceptible to the disease, but he stressed that anyone of any race, age, or gender could come down with either major form of long COVID. Some patients, like Ramos, can experience both types of symptoms.

“Long COVID and its myriad manifestations … can literally happen across a lifespan,” Al-Aly said. “And no demographic group [is] immune.”

He stressed that people underestimate the risk of COVID infections in general and, more specifically, the risk of repeated reinfection. Even mild cases can lead to long COVID, especially if it isn’t the first time a person has become sick. One study from Statistics Canada found that around 15 percent of people reported having persistent symptoms after their first infection. That number approaches 40 percent after the third and subsequent infections. 

Katie Drackert of Austin walks with a cane due to the effects of long COVID. Jordan Vonderhaar for the Texas Observer

Before the pandemic, Katie Drackert worked almost full-time as a performing artist, often for LGBTQ+ audiences. In March 2020, they received a grant from the city of Austin to put on a variety show—plans that were quickly derailed by the Coronavirus epidemic and the temporary shutdown of the arts that followed. 

“I was busy and very active and very focused on my artistic career,” they recalled of their prepandemic days. 

They got COVID for the first time in December 2021 at age 27 during the wave of infections caused by the omicron variant. Early reports suggested the omicron variant caused milder illnesses—a Fox News commentator even suggested deliberately allowing the illness to spread in order to help build immunity—a perception that persisted even after experts tried sounding the alarm about its ongoing risks.

“I had body aches from hell. I felt like I got played because some people said it was mild,” they said. 

Despite this, they’d been careful about getting vaccinated and wearing a mask because Drackert had always struggled to get over illnesses, even the common cold. Unfortunately, they were scheduled to get a booster shot a week after they got sick. Instead, they tried the monoclonal antibody treatments, which only seemed to make them feel sicker. 

“I would completely lose my breath just walking the six steps from the bed to the bathroom,” they said. 

Drackert was severely ill for at least 10 days the first time they got COVID, and symptoms lingered after they started testing negative. As soon as they felt themselves improving, Drackert pushed themself to do an outdoor performance. This proved disastrous for their health. 

“It triggered such an intense flare up, I was having so much trouble breathing,” Drackert said. “After that, I was doomed. Pushing myself too soon really messed me up.” 

Lingering symptoms included chest and lung pain and difficulty breathing—they’d had asthma flare-ups before when they got sick but now suffered from it all the time. They would experience sharp chest pains. They also had intense fatigue and brain fog. And they developed severe depression for the first time in their life, which both Brode and Al-Aly said is common in long-haul COVID patients. 

Then Drackert got COVID again in May 2022, when they “succumbed to peer pressure” by briefly removing their mask at a crowded event.

“I heard the numbers were lower, and it was such a mistake,” they recalled with a sigh.

Even though they took the COVID treatment pill Paxlovid—an antiviral medication developed by Pfizer—this time, they could still see and feel the effects of their repeated infections. 

“I look at old pictures of me before I had COVID, and I’m like, that’s a different person, even the look in my eyes. I feel like I aged a lot faster.”

Camille is another Texan who underestimated the risks of long COVID. (Because she’s part of a long COVID advocacy group that illegally posts stickers in public places—a form of graffiti—the Observer has agreed to use only her first name here).  

“It’s pretty rare; it usually affects people with preexisting conditions and older people,” she thought. 

Katie Drackert now uses a nebulizer due to symptoms of long COVID. Jordan Vonderhaar for the Texas Observer

Camille, a graphic designer from Austin, was just 30 years old and healthy. She also cited President Joe Biden’s declaration that the “pandemic is over” as a factor in her decision to drop masking and return to more normal activities.  

“So I really was under the impression, since no one was masking anymore, that, okay, things are safer now,” she said.

Then a COVID-19 infection hit her hard. 

“I tested positive for 16 days total, and then I just remained sick for months,” she said. “I would stand up, and within seconds, my heart would go into tachycardia. I’d be putting on my deodorant, and my heart rate would hit 140-something.”

She couldn’t work and had to move back in with her mother. 

“I couldn’t take care of myself; I was on the couch or in bed 95 percent of the time,” she said. 

Just as Ramos struggled to get diagnosed, Camille found it difficult to get medical professionals to take her seriously. 

“I had a doctor who told me back in January that I was just depressed,” she said. “I needed to just take Lexapro [an antidepressant] and go back to work and push through it.”

The first step towards healing for many of Brode’s patients is simply hearing him validate their experience. Friends, loved ones, and even medical professionals frequently cast doubt on long-haulers’ suffering or cannot connect the dots about their condition. Brode also suggested the hurried nature of many medical appointments contributes to the poor care long COVID patients frequently receive.

“In our own patients, our data shows they can have up to 18 new symptoms,” Brode said. “And if you only get 15 minutes with a doctor, they’re not going to get that in-depth understanding or care.”

Doctors, especially general practitioners, must keep up with countless developing medical treatments and research into diseases. “A doctor’s interest and ability to stay up [to date] with the evolving literature is limited,” Brode said.

In addition, there’s currently no simple diagnostic test that can show whether or not a person has long COVID. 

“I think a lot of patients hear, ‘The tests are normal, so you’re fine,’” Brode added. “I try to emphasize that it just means it’s long COVID, and we can’t test for that. Our data shows they’ve usually bounced between four of five providers before they receive that diagnosis.”

Al-Aly explained that modern medicine has a long and unfortunate history of ignoring or denying the experiences of sick patients suffering from poorly understood conditions, essentially accusing patients of having a mental illness rather than a physical, underlying condition. He compared it to multiple sclerosis or epilepsy, in which patients were once accused of being crazy until technology advanced to the point where their conditions could be established. 

“Just because we don’t completely understand [long COVID], it is almost like history is repeating itself,” Al-Aly said. “People say ‘Oh yeah, it’s all in your head’ instead of acknowledging the limitations of our knowledge.” 

Brode stressed that helping long-haulers learn about the experiences of others can help them feel validated. Ramos described a painful vibration in her lips, fingers, and other extremities. Brode explained that numerous people have come to him with a similar sensation, often prefacing it with “you’re never going to believe this.” Some compare it to feeling like their body is trembling but without an actual, corresponding tremor. 

“We actually don’t even have a medical term for this,” Brode told me. “But hundreds of patients have described this to me.”

There is a growing body of research suggesting a possible cause of PEM in long COVID patients. A 2021 study was the first to suggest that microclots, tiny blockages that the body’s natural systems seem unable to clear easily, form in the body’s capillaries after exercise in long haul patients, providing one potential angle for further research. But a great deal about the illness remains mysterious. 

Like the typical long-hauler, Ramos bounced between medical professionals as she tried to find answers. Doctors were often reluctant to perform all the tests necessary to diagnose or properly treat her. In the summer of 2022, she was constantly sick and forced to move back into her parent’s house. 

She landed in the hospital in August of that year, where physicians began noticing unusual patterns in her blood work, such as imbalances in her levels of electrolytes and her levels of creatinine, a waste product of the kidneys. But since she was uninsured, the hospital simply stabilized her and sent her home with instructions to get more tests.

Supported by her family, she exercised as much as possible but was winded simply from walking around the block. She attempted to switch to a super “clean,” healthy, plant-based diet, but even simple foods seemed to upset her body. Eventually, she was vomiting several times per day; even watching TV was sometimes so disorienting that it would make her throw up. 

Vanessa Ramos now has a port in her abdomen for her chemotherapy treatments due to vasculitis resulting from COVID-19. Jordan Vonderhaar for the Texas Observer

As her condition worsened, she tried to avoid another costly hospital visit, holding out until she could get onto a plan through the national health insurance marketplace, which became active in January of last year. She was quickly checked back into the hospital, where her blood work showed signs of kidney failure. Even then, doctors were reluctant to give her a formal diagnosis or put the blame on long COVID. Placed on emergency dialysis, it was there she met a curious nurse who listened to her story and helped her find a diagnosis, one that she’d eventually get the doctors to accept as well: Granulomatosis with polyangiitis, a rare form of vasculitis that matched up with nearly all of her symptoms, from the initial sinus and ear infections to her eventual kidney failure. 

Treatment for this condition requires a complicated combination of steroids and immunosuppressant drugs, including low doses of chemotherapy. Ramos can pay for her ongoing treatment, which now involves starting every day around 4 a.m. with nine hours of home dialysis, through the help of the American Kidney Fund. She’s currently awaiting approval for a kidney transplant through St. David’s Medical Center; even though she has a donor lined up, getting approval for a transplant is an often lengthy and difficult process.  

And it’s all left Ramos vulnerable to reinfection from COVID or other serious illnesses. She is now among the immunocompromised who continue to struggle the most to avoid the ongoing pandemic. She’s risking her health every time she goes shopping or tries to visit with friends or family.

“I feel incredibly isolated and completely outside of society. The amount of times I have to say no to events …” she trailed off. 

The pain was visible on her face as she recalled her former life. 

“The old Vanessa was a social person; she was active; she could go camping on a whim and do all these things that fed me mentally,” she added. “Now, I can’t even function. It was stolen from me, and it makes me feel incredibly isolated and angry at the people who can get COVID five times and be fine, while I got it once, and it destroyed my life.” 

When the Observer spoke with her, Ramos was feeling relatively well and able to join her spouse on errands, but that varies from day to day. 

”I’m grateful that my disease is somewhat in remission right now, but I’m still not a functioning person,” she added.

Katie Drackert also struggles with feeling isolated from the queer and performance art communities to which they used to belong, especially since almost all of their former colleagues and friends seem to have moved on and forgotten about the pandemic.

“When everyone around you is living in a different reality where COVID is over or COVID is mild, you feel a little bit like you’re losing your mind,” they said. “I don’t feel like I’m part of those communities anymore because they refuse to accommodate [this illness].”

Getting involved with advocacy efforts was frightening initially because they felt like COVID was the “elephant in the room” that no one wanted to discuss. Drackert feared being further ostracized from their community or hampered in looking for jobs, a concern the Observer heard from other long-haulers, including Camille. 

“I thought if I pushed back on COVID and things that I felt community leaders were doing wrong, they wouldn’t want to book me,” Drackert said.

The turning point for Drackert was taking part in an April 2023 Federal Drug Administration panel where long COVID patients were invited to share their experiences in front of a panel of experts. Feeling heard by medical professionals and other long-haulers inspired them to be more outspoken. Still unable to perform, even outdoors, without harming their health, Drackert pivoted to new ways of influencing the community.

“I kept trying to perform, and then I kept having, five days, six days a week where I was just knocked out, and I was like, ‘This isn’t sustainable. I can’t do this. I have to let go of this part of me,’” they recalled.

Drackert founded an organization called Clear the Air ATX, which lends HEPA-grade air purifying filters to artists, musicians, and other organizations hosting events to encourage “COVID safer events.” They were inspired by a similar project in Chicago called the Clean Air Club. After a small but successful crowdfunding campaign, they’ve started fielding requests to loan out the filters. At the time of publication, the organization had publicly announced four of these safer events, ranging from art openings to a dance party hosted by local cooperative radio station KOOP. In total, they received over a dozen requests for air filters for events in the first month after making them available. 

Camille is part of another group fighting back against public apathy around COVID: the international advocacy group called the Berlin Buyers Club. The name is an allusion to the home of the group’s founder and to the Dallas Buyers Club, the radical AIDS support group that in the 1980s purchased and shared lifesaving experimental drugs. Like the members of that historic group, the founders of the Berlin Buyers Club feel left behind. Their homepage succinctly sums up their motto: “The government lied. COVID destroyed us. We are young. We want our lives back.”

Both the Berlin Buyers Club and Clear the Air ATX hope to raise awareness about the continued dangers of the Coronavirus and the risks of long COVID in a way that is hip, clever, and shareable—designed to appeal to younger audiences that frequently get their news and information from TikTok, Instagram, and other social networks. For Valentine’s Day, Drackert commissioned cartoonist Rachael Harmon to create stickers with sayings like “No Mask, No Ass” on a conversation heart-style candy and “Pure Love” next to a personal HEPA air filter. 

The Berlin Buyers Club has taken it even further: Camille and friends created a series of stickers with eye-catching mottos that club members have plastered all over lamp poles and utility boxes in several Texas cities and around the world. One bright red sticker reads: “We are living in a mass disabling event—don’t ignore long COVID.” 

“Everything I read in the media up until I got long COVID was framing [it] as something that happens to older people because older people tend to get more severe illnesses, and that’s a complete lie,” Camille said. 

With Camille’s help, the club rented a pair of billboards in Converse and Kyle in November, reading “I miss myself / I have long COVID” and “We’re still sick #CureLongCovid.” 

In addition to urging young people to take more personal responsibility around the pandemic, Camille and Katie Drackert hope their efforts will raise awareness about the need to improve air quality in public spaces and commercial buildings, which many experts agree is a key step toward preventing future infections.

Ziyad Al-Aly said we must “update building codes so we require ventilation and air filtration systems.”

“COVID-19 is an airborne virus where the biggest risk of spread is through enclosed, poorly ventilated indoor areas when they are crowded during periods of high cases,” Brode added. “Certainly, investment in ventilation infrastructure would not only decrease the risk of COVID and other airborne illnesses, but also potential future viruses and pandemics.”

Al-Aly called the ongoing waves of infection and development of new long-haulers, “an invisible crisis of the aftereffects of the pandemic.” 

“We’re literally moving on without really looking at the mayhem it produced,” he added. “We’re all sick and tired of this pandemic, but in our itch to move on, we’re forgetting to look back and say ‘Oh my Lord!’ it destroyed the lives of so many people and continues to do so.” 

He likened the desire to move on without repairing the damage to abandoning a city after it’s been leveled by an earthquake. 

“These long COVID advocates are correct: We shouldn’t feel helpless and resigned that everyone is going to get and keep getting COVID,” Brode said. “In the absence of a targeted cure, the best thing we can do for now is try to prevent long COVID in the first place.”

A comprehensive approach to preventing COVID-19 infections and subsequent long COVID cases would combine improved ventilation with better vaccine uptake (including more frequent use of boosters) and improved care for existing long-haulers. 

“I think the public is telling us they’re sick and tired of these stopgap measures.”

Staying up to date on vaccines and boosters can dramatically reduce the likelihood of getting long COVID, in addition to reducing the risk of hospitalization, according to several studies and experts like Peter Hotez, dean of the National School of Tropical Medicine at Baylor University and a professor of pediatrics and molecular virology and microbiology. Hotez was an important part of the team that developed Corbevax, the open-source COVID-19 vaccine that helped immunize millions of people in India and Indonesia. 

Unfortunately, in America, where vaccines are more widely available, fewer and fewer people are keeping up to date with their boosters. 

“Not enough Americans are getting the new vaccine,” Hotez told the Observer. “[They’re] not aware of the fact that this new annual immunization is quite different from the previous one because it’s targeting the current lineages, the current strains, which are so different from the original lineage.” 

According to the CDC, as of January 2024, only 21.5 percent of adults and 11 percent of children in the United States had received the latest vaccine. That’s compared to almost 50 percent who lined up for annual flu shots in the same period. Hotez hoped there would be campaigns to increase public awareness about the need to get boosted.

“You’re getting this booster not only to prevent you from going to the hospital but to reduce the likelihood that you will get long COVID,” he added.

For Al-Aly, the poor uptake of the current batch of boosters and the refusal of medical professionals and the general public to resume masking even when infections increase are signs that we need to invest in more permanent, sustainable solutions to this illness. 

“I think the public is telling us they’re sick and tired of these stopgap measures,” he said.

One promising possibility is the development of intranasal COVID-19 vaccines. By applying the vaccine to the mucous membranes, these treatments would help create a natural, biological immunity directly where the disease enters the human body. 

“Having intranasal oral vaccine-induced strong mucosal immunity acts almost like a virtual shield to block the infection, so you don’t have to mask,” he explained.

In addition, these vaccines could also last longer: up to five years, Al-Aly said. 

For the relatively lucky long-haulers, symptoms may fade naturally over the months following their initial infection. Camille, for example, can work part-time again. But for many others, the struggle continues almost unabated. 

These are people who are “really severely disabled, bedridden, and cannot work. … Their lives are upended, their marriages are ruined, their relationships are ruined, and they lost employment,” Al-Aly said. 

The uniqueness of each individual’s illness only compounds the difficulty of developing effective treatments. “Every person is their own unique disease or their own unique phenotype,” he continued.

Brode takes a step-by-step approach for patients who come to the Post-COVID clinic at UT Health Austin. The first step is to help the patient learn techniques to manage their energy and reduce post-exertional malaise as well as “structured and intentional rehabilitation focused on their physical, cognitive, or mental health symptoms,” he said. If that doesn’t work, they can try conventional medications, which are normally used to treat symptoms like insomnia, nerve pain, or fatigue. 

But from there, the options gradually escalate to more experimental, potentially expensive, forms of treatment. These include antiviral medications, which could help clean up fragments of the Coronavirus that may remain in the patient’s body and continue to cause harm even after the main infection passes. Other options include medications to treat chronic inflammation and treatments that improve circulation or help the body use oxygen more efficiently. 

Katie Drackert received a treatment called Enhanced External Counter Pulsation (EECP), originally designed for people who have heart disease or severe circulation disorders. For them, the benefits have been remarkable, though unpredictable.

“I feel like I have more capacity now,” Drackert said. “There are times now where I can dance and not trigger malaise, not trigger vertigo. And then there are times I just can’t.” 

Brode emphasized the limitations of these kinds of experimental treatments: “There are some preliminary case reports showing that it can be effective in improving long COVID fatigue and breathlessness, but it’s important to know that research is preliminary, without a control group, and the research has been funded by organizations that provide the therapy.”

Because these treatments are still experimental, most insurance plans will not cover them. 

“I don’t want to hide treatments that patients are telling me are effective for them, but I also don’t want to hype them up when there may be a financial burden, and there’s no scientific basis to say it will work for all patients with long COVID,” Brode said.

Drackert now requires a myriad of medications and therapeutic treatments for her symptoms of long COVID. Jordan Vonderhaar for the Texas Observer

Al-Aly concurred that there are new treatments under development that could help—for example, a study published in December about a drug called SIM01 showed promising preliminary results through altering patients’ gut microbiomes to improve their immune response. Six months into the study, the group receiving SIM01 showed improvement in fatigue, memory loss, and other symptoms versus a group given a placebo. 

However, the larger problem, according to Al-Aly, is that research into long COVID treatments is proceeding at a “snail’s speed,” especially when compared with the rapid development of the initial vaccines and considering the massive number of long-haul COVID sufferers.

“You have this huge problem, and you’re addressing it with these small Band-Aid solutions,” Al-Aly said. “We need a much more robust and much more comprehensive and much more ambitious effort to really address the needs of people with long COVID.” 

On January 18, Al-Aly appeared before the U.S. Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions for a hearing about long COVID, which he called a promising first step toward the kind of larger response he believes is necessary. 

“I think it was well received by the senators and the patient community,” he said. “We need to keep the conversation going. How do we as a nation deal with long COVID?”

He doesn’t believe there is an adequate, clear plan in place: “Hearing each other is fine. Talking is fine. … But you know what helps people with long COVID? Action.” He stressed that we must “deliver treatment, care, and support systems for the people impacted.” 

“We need to keep pushing for this national conversation,” Al-Aly said. “We cannot go through a pandemic and not learn from it. We cannot go through a pandemic without dealing with the aftereffects.” 

Despite the pandemic fatigue, he said, we owe it to the people who are sick to do much more. 

“We want to move on, but we cannot just ignore and turn our backs on the people with long COVID,” Al-Aly concluded. “That’s not going to be acceptable.”

Boeing CEO to exit in broader management shakeup as manufacturing issues plague storied plane maker

posted in: News | 0

By DAVID KOENIG (AP Airlines Writer)

Boeing CEO David Calhoun will step down from the embattled plane maker at the end of the year as part of a broad management shakeup after a series of mishaps at one of America’s iconic manufacturers.

Stan Deal, president and CEO of Boeing’s commercial airplanes unit, will retire immediately. Stephanie Pope, the company’s chief operating officer for less than three months, has taken over leadership of the key division.

The company said board Chairman Lawrence Kellner, a former airline chief, won’t stand for re-election in May and will be replaced by a former Qualcomm CEO.

Boeing has been under intense pressure since early January, when a panel blew off a brand-new Alaska Airlines 737 Max. Investigators say bolts that help keep the panel in place were missing after repair work at the Boeing factory.

The Federal Aviation Administration has stepped up its scrutiny of the company, including putting a limit on production of 737s. An FAA audit of Boeing’s 737 factory near Seattle gave the company failing grades on nearly three dozen aspects of production.

Airline executives have expressed their frustration with the company, and even minor incidents involving Boeing jets have attracted extra attention.

Fallout from the Jan. 5 blowout has raised scrutiny of Boeing to its highest level since two Boeing 737 Max jets crashed in 2018 in Indonesia and 2019 in Ethiopia. In all, the crashes killed 346 people.

In a note Monday to employees, Calhoun, 67, called the accident “a watershed moment for Boeing.” that requires ”a total commitment to safety and quality at every level of our company.”

“The eyes of the world are on us, and I know we will come through this moment a better company, building on all the learnings we accumulated as we worked together to rebuild Boeing over the last number of years,” he said.

Boeing’s most significant effort to improve quality has the opening of discussions about bringing Spirit AeroSystems, which builds fuselages for the Max and many parts for that and other Boeing planes, back into the company. Mistakes made at Spirit, which Boeing spun off nearly 20 years ago, have compounded the company’s problems.

Calhoun said the two companies are making progress in talks “and it’s very important.”

Calhoun said the decision to leave was his. Calhoun was a Boeing director when he became CEO in January 2020, replacing Dennis Muilenburg, who was fired in the aftermath of the Max crashes. In 2021, Boeing’s board raised the mandatory retirement age for CEO to keep Calhoun in the job.

The company has chosen former Qualcomm CEO Steven Mollenkopf to become the new board chairman and to lead the search for Calhoun’s replacement.

Richard Aboulafia, a longtime aerospace analyst and now a consultant at AeroDynamic Advisory, said the management shakeup “is likely to be a pivotal moment in Boeing’s history, and probably a very positive one,” but the outcome depends on the next CEO. He said Patrick Shanahan, a former Boeing executive and acting U.S. Defense secretary who has led Spirit AeroSystems since last fall, would be “a great choice.”

Cai von Rumohr, aerospace analyst at Cowen, said the management changes are “a partial step toward changing its culture to underscore safety and rebuild investor confidence in the company.” He said the fact that Calhoun gave more than eight months’ notice will help the Boeing board make “a considered decision” instead of “a knee-jerk reaction.”

Pope, the new head of the commercial-airplanes business, was promoted to Boeing chief operating officer only in January. Before that, she was president and CEO of Boeing’s services business and chief financial officer of the airplanes division.

Shares of The Boeing Co. rose about 1% in early trading.

_______

AP Business Writer Michelle Chapman contributed to this report from New York.

Spring storm winding down on Monday — after setting a record

posted in: News | 0

Our spring storm is winding down, the Twin Cities office of the National Weather Service is reporting early Monday.

It brought plenty of snow with it over the weekend.

As of 5:57 a.m., the weather service is reporting these 24-hour snow totals:

Minneapolis-St. Paul International Airport: 8.2 inches (new record)
Eau Claire, Wis.: 10 inches (new record)
Northwest Twin Cities: 8.1 inches

Get more reports as they come in at weather.gov/source/crh/snowmap.html?sid=mpx.

The heaviest snow has ended for the metro, the weather service reports, but steady snow will continue across western and central Minnesota.

In the Twin Cities, the morning commute is causing slipping and sliding.

There’s more snow in the forecast, about 1 to 2 inches that could begin falling Monday night and overnight into Tuesday. Travel could be challenging as wet roads may become slick as temperatures fall below freezing.

In fact, the weather service reports, travel is the main impact of this coming round of precipitation.

Related Articles

Local News |


‘It’s boring if nothing exciting happens.’ North St. Paul volunteer meteorologist revels in bad weather.

Local News |


Genealogy research links Winona woman to newborn found dead in Mississippi River

Local News |


State issues fish consumption advisory for Mississippi River from St. Paul Park to Wabasha

Local News |


Where will trout survive in warming North Shore streams?

Local News |


State boys basketball: Breck beats rival Minnehaha Academy for third time to reach Class 2A title game

Ready to MOOV? Alternatives to Uber, Lyft face a long road ahead

posted in: News | 0

When Uber and Lyft announced they’d be pulling out of Minneapolis on May 1, Murid Amini saw his chance. Amini, a Woodbury-based startup consultant and Carlson School of Management alum, set about to launch the platform MOOV, a rideshare app that he says will ensure drivers receive 80% of each fare, effectively outbidding the two leading ride-hailing companies for labor.

So far, he’s got his sights set on registering about 50 drivers within the next week or two who have signed up online, and he hopes to kick that up to 1,000 drivers when marketing starts in earnest in April.

“I expect to be on the ground by mid-to-late April, actually having drivers on the ground making money,” said Amini, an Afghan refugee who grew up in the Cedar-Riverside neighborhood of Minneapolis, where his father still lives.

He believes he’s off to a promising start, but even if he’s successful, MOOV won’t come close on its own to filling the void left by 8,000 Uber and Lyft drivers suddenly ejected from the Minneapolis market, if the two companies actually retrench at all. Uber has said it will leave the Twin Cities metropolitan area entirely. Uber confirmed Friday that it will close its Richfield service center, where drivers have their cars inspected, on April 15.

Lyft maintains it will stick around, but not service trips beginning or ending in Minneapolis.

What’s next for Uber, Lyft?

Some have likened Uber and Lyft’s saber-rattling to a game of chicken, with both San Francisco-based companies making bold threats in order to exact concessions from the city of Minneapolis, whose city council recently voted to impose sizable wage increases on each service.

The state could, in theory, step in and override that decision, and some Minneapolis City Council members are already calling for a reconsideration vote next month.

“If the state does not pre-empt them, I think they will leave the market, just to prove a point,” predicted Amini, a former consultant with McKinsey & Co. whose clients have included a transportation logistics company. “I think eventually the (state) will step in, but I don’t know that it will happen before May 1.”

Otherwise, the Minneapolis wages, based on per-minute and per-mile rates, would be even higher than those laid out in a recent state study of what it would take to ensure a $15.57-per-hour minimum wage for each driver with benefits, and they surpass a compromise proposal offered by Minneapolis Mayor Jacob Frey.

Amini acknowledged that the higher wages would be a hardship for MOOV, too, though they won’t be a deal breaker. His app would have to record the time and mileage spent by each driver when even a portion of a MOOV trip travels through Minneapolis, and compensate the driver accordingly.

Amini, an electrical engineer by training, believes he can tackle the dual rates, but not every rideshare company may be equipped to.

Speaking of which, how many rideshare “transportation network companies” have applied to the city of St. Paul for licensing in the week or so since Uber and Lyft announced their upcoming departure from Minneapolis?

As of late last week, the answer was officially none.

“We haven’t seen any new TNC applications come in,” said Casey Rodriguez, a spokesman for the St. Paul Department of Safety and Inspections, on Thursday morning.

Amini said he’s now submitted his paperwork to get licensed with both Minneapolis and St. Paul, and he’s nailing down insurance and just about ready to test the MOOV app in real time.

Steve Wright, chief executive officer of Wridz, said his Austin, Texas-based ridesharing app could have upwards of 1,500 drivers in the Twin Cities market by mid-May, whether Uber leaves or not.

“We’re coming there regardless,” said Wright, noting the subscription service charges drivers a flat monthly fee of $100, allowing them to keep 100% of their own fares.

But so far, only Uber and Lyft are officially licensed in Minneapolis.

Startups sprang up in Austin — then disappeared

Some may ask who needs new startups when taxi cab companies have been around for years?

Uber and Lyft’s utility isn’t just in offering rides. Their technology bypasses phone calls, language barriers and the uncertainty of not knowing when or even if a cab driver will arrive by allowing online hailing and vehicle tracking, as well as app-based payments, tips and customer ratings.

For over a decade, they’ve made having to pick up a phone or walk the block to solicit cab company after cab company for a semi-anonymous driver a thing of the past.

When Uber and Lyft left Austin, Texas, for a year, a number of rideshare companies rolled in with hopes of taking their place. The result, according to widespread reports, was a bit of a patchwork quilt of startups, as well as informal, unlicensed alternatives like those advertised on the “Austin Underground Rideshare Community” Facebook page.

Some drivers reportedly copied and pasted their old bios, complete with customer ratings, from their Uber and Lyft pages onto Facebook, creating an ad-hoc “verification” system. Uber and Lyft still serviced areas just outside the city, so some passengers reportedly hired their drivers to get them to the Austin city limits, and then tipped them cash on the sly to take them farther into Austin proper.

The two ride-hailing companies veered back into the market in 2017 after Texas Gov. Greg Abbott overruled Austin’s driver fingerprinting requirements with statewide regulations. Unable to compete, many of the startups gradually disappeared, according to KUT Radio, Austin’s National Public Radio station.

Does that bode badly for Twin Cities ride-hailing startups?

“My guess is they got bought out and they decided to take a profitable exit,” Amini said. “It doesn’t really give me pause. Even if Uber and Lyft stick around, I can still meet those numbers and give drivers more money.”

Compared to Uber and Lyft, “I would assume most competitors have lower operating costs, just because they’re not multibillion-dollar companies and they’re not publicly traded,” he added. “Most of the investors I’m working with are not putting any kind of pressure on me to be profitable any time soon, even though I plan to be. The funny thing is, (Uber and Lyft) created that opening by threatening to leave.”

How much do they make?

How much do Uber and Lyft drivers rake in, anyway? The answer lands somewhere between less than $10.54 an hour and upwards of $50 an hour, depending upon how you figure it. For continuous service, according to the recent state study, a driver could stand to make $53 an hour in the metro before expenses, but most spend a fair amount of time fare-less each hour while waiting for or driving to their next passenger. During that time, they’re not making money.

So average gross hourly earnings are actually closer to $30 an hour. Now subtract for expenses, which can be considerable given the price of gas, wear-and-tear on vehicles, insurance, cellphone/GPS and cleaning. The hourly average then drops to $14.48 in the metro — and that’s just an average.

The state study found that one-fourth of drivers took home net, after-expense earnings, of $10.54 or less, while one-fourth took home $17.51 or more. The net median, which is calculated differently than the average, was $13.63 in the metro. In Greater Minnesota, the net was even lower.

Minneapolis maintains a minimum wage of $15.57 per hour. To reach that level of reimbursement, the study found a driver would need to earn 49 cents per minute and 89 cents per mile. To also cover benefits such as sick time, health insurance, retirement and unemployment insurance, the per-mile rate would have to rise to $1.20.

On March 7, the day before the state study was published, the Minneapolis City Council chose not to wait for the results and approved a much higher driver reimbursement rate of 51 cents per minute and $1.40 per mile, well above the figures outlined by the state study.

Some critics have questioned why a part-time “gig” job would merit a living wage with benefits if it’s primarily supplemental income. The authors of the state study found that almost 70% of all trips were conducted by drivers logging in for 20 hours or more. Drivers who logged in at least 32 hours provided 41% of all trips.

Nearly half of all registered Uber and Lyft drivers worked fewer than 10 hours per week, but those casual drivers accounted for just 11% of all trips, according to the state study.

Related Articles

Local News |


Older Boeing plane found to have missing panel after flight from California to southern Oregon

Local News |


Will they stay or will they go? Uber threatens to quit all of Twin Cities — including St. Paul, MSP

Local News |


Uber, Lyft say they will pull out of Minneapolis after council overrides veto of minimum wage rule

Local News |


Pressure on Boeing grows as Buttigieg says the company needs to cooperate with investigations

Local News |


Melvin Carter’s State of the City address: Housing, hiring and plowing on the agenda