Olympic Trials: For former Gophers star Shane Wiskus, it’s all about falling in love with gymnastics again

posted in: News | 0

Shane Wiskus knew his body was betraying him and he couldn’t run the risk of having it betray Team USA in the process. So, the 25-year-old former Gophers star gymnast made the incredibly difficult decision to withdraw from the Pan American Games last year, forgoing the chance to represent his country despite working so hard to earn his spot on the U.S. men’s gymnastics team.

“It got to the point that I would go into the gym and not know if I could do gymnastics that day,” he said. “I knew I couldn’t put that on my teammates.”

As much as the injures crushed his spirit at the time, Wiskus, who is from Spring Park, Minn., reflected with gratitude as he prepared for the U.S. Gymnastics Olympic Trials, which begin on Thursday night at Target Center in Minneapolis. Not only did the Pan Am Games setback force him to confront his own mortality in the sport he loves so much, it set him on a path toward rediscovering why he fell in love with the sport in the first place.

“I really tried to refocus, like, ‘Why am I actually doing this?’ ” he said. “If this is going to be my last year with the sport, I wanted to make sure I was doing it for all the right reasons.”

Maybe it’s fitting then that the U.S. Gymnastics Olympic Trials are being hosted in his home state. It wasn’t too long ago that Wiskus was a child growing up in west-metro Spring Park, fearlessly flipping through the air with childhood dreams of representing Team USA at the pinnacle of the sport.

After going on to have an illustrious collegiate career with Gophers men’s gymnastics team from 2018-21, Wiskus accomplished a lifelong goal by qualifying for the 2020 Summer Olympics in Tokyo. Ironically, as memorable as that milestone was for Wiskus in the grand scheme of things, it started to consume him as he set his sights on the 2024 Summer Olympics in Paris.

He went from chasing dreams to chasing results. Not exactly a recipe for success.

“My journey since then has been about falling back in love with the sport,” Wiskus said. “You come off of that high of going to the Olympics and want to chase the next thing. I could feel my expectations of myself serving as the driving factor in everything I was doing as opposed to what used to be my passion for the sport. I was almost forcing it.”

It was a slippery slope for Wiskus made even more treacherous by the injuries that continued to crop up. He decided to take some time off to center himself. He knew how important this particular stretch was going to be, and he wanted to make sure he gave himself the best chance for success.

“Obviously when I was in that moment it was hard not to project like, ‘I hope I don’t feel like this when I have to try to make the Olympics,’ ” Wiskus said. ‘You learn to take a step back and take it one day at a time, and now here I am still taking it one day at a time.”

Though he knows nothing is guaranteed beyond the Olympic Trials this weekend, Wiskus has a newfound perspective that he feels makes him as dangerous as anyone in the competition.

“I love doing it,” he said. “I try to approach it from a stance of gratitude. I’m grateful to be here still able to do what I’m doing. I can still remember how I felt as a young gymnast, and regardless of what happens this weekend, I can already say with confidence that that 12-year-old Shane would be so proud of where I am today.”

Related Articles

Olympics |


St. Paul native Elijah Vogel keeps his gold medal dream alive

Olympics |


Lakeville’s Regan Smith wins 200 backstroke, her third triumph of U.S. Olympic trials

Olympics |


Lakeville’s Regan Smith wins 200 butterfly at U.S. Olympic swim trials

Olympics |


Regan Smith qualifies first in 200 fly at Olympic Trials, final is tonight

Olympics |


The Olympics are more than fun and games. They’re a billion-dollar business with political overtones

Opinion: Book Banners Are Going After Libraries. But So Is New York City’s Mayor.

posted in: News | 0

“Efforts to censor and prohibit books are not the same as municipal negotiations about library operating budgets. But they are not entirely unrelated either. Both are clear indications of how the value of public libraries and access to knowledge is under threat across America.”

Emil Cohen/NYC Council Media Unit

The Queens Public Library branch in Flushing.

CityViews are readers’ opinions, not those of City Limits. Add your voice today!

In April 2022, in response to an unprecedented wave of book bans affecting schools across the country, Brooklyn Public Library launched Books Unbanned, a program for teens to apply for a digital library card and access the books that were being restricted in their communities. In its first eight months, the program allowed more than 7,600 teens to check out over 240,000 books.

The program was widely hailed and the librarians behind it were later named Librarians of the Year. It was a shining example of how citizens and institutions can stand up for freedom and democracy even as parts of the country take steps to suppress them.

Fast forward two years, and today New York City’s libraries are again embroiled in a fight for library access. Except this time, they’re not fighting book bans in other states; they’re working to fight precipitous budget cuts from city government. According to a coalition of city libraries, the astounding $58.3 million in proposed funding cuts for the next fiscal year will inevitably lead to reductions in staff, weekend service, library materials, building renovations, and programming. This comes on the heels of municipal budget cuts that already led to reductions in service last year.

Of course, efforts to censor and prohibit books are not the same as municipal negotiations about library operating budgets. But they are not entirely unrelated either. Both are clear indications of how the value of public libraries and access to knowledge is under threat across America.

Ever since Benjamin Franklin’s efforts to establish the Library Company of Philadelphia in the 1730s, libraries have been among the United States’ most democratic institutions. As gateways to knowledge, libraries are foundational to the idea of an educated and informed populace, necessary for a healthy and equitable democracy. In providing free access to all, they are an affirmative public good that reflect our common humanity and basic social compact.

Libraries are also trusted public spaces where all can gather. They serve diverse communities with multifaceted purposes, from voting to taxes. They offer unique programs that serve the less fortunate, from asylum seekers to citizens left behind in the digital divide, to the elderly and homebound. They are working to help students impacted by the learning loss from COVID-19.

These are the communities in New York City that will be most impacted by proposed cuts.

The national wave of book bans that has metastasized for the past three years has underscored just how much access to books matters: to democracy, to identity formation, to the cohesion of diverse communities. We are frequently told if books are banned in schools, families and students can “just get them at the public library.”

We expect public libraries to step into any such breach, as reliable, ever-present institutions of civil society. But we cannot treat these institutions as the fail-safe mechanism for public education and the social safety net on the one hand, and undercut their operations with the other.

And indeed, the ideological assault on libraries nationwide is continuing to worsen. From Alabama to California there are escalating demands to remove LGBTQ books and Pride displays, and efforts to review library collections to sift out books with certain content. Numerous states are passing laws to threaten librarians and educators with criminal penalties. One Idaho library just banned children—becoming “adults-only”—in an effort to comply with one of these pseudo-authoritarian laws.

In the face of this crisis, our city’s libraries have risen to the occasion: launching innovative programs to grant ready access to books for youth across the country, and working to raise public awareness of this crisis. They have set the bar high, serving as a model for how public libraries can stand unflinchingly to facilitate equitable and inclusive access to information for all, regardless of background, income, or beliefs.

In this, our libraries mirror the values of our city. As the “capital of the world,” New Yorkers know that we stand for something universal and that what we decide matters. New York must continue to be a citadel of books and learning at a time when they are under siege elsewhere.

Countless other cities and states look to New York’s libraries as exemplars, from their collections to their services to their programs. Brooklyn’s Books Unbanned program is only one such example, emulated in Seattle and beyond. If that status is to be maintained, ours must be a city investing more in its libraries, not sacrificing them during shortsighted budget negotiations.

Jonathan Friedman is Sy Syms Managing Director of US Free Expression Programs at PEN America.

What role will housing affordability play in 2024 election?

posted in: News | 0

Matt Reynolds | (TNS) The Atlanta Journal-Constitution

ATLANTA — Law student Aundria Towns and her partner, health care worker Hayden Herrick, have a household income of more than $100,000. Pre-pandemic, those earnings might have given the Douglas County, Georgia, couple a pick of houses.

Not in 2024.

Weighed down by student loans, $2,000-a-month rent, stubbornly high interest rates and soaring house prices, the couple has put their plans to buy a house in Cobb County on hold. At least for the time being.

“It seems so out of reach. It seems almost impossible,” Towns told The Atlanta Journal-Constitution.

That is a sentiment shared by millions of Americans struggling to get into starter homes, make rent, or upscale or downsize as the country prepares for the 2024 general election. Although concerns about inflation, food and gas prices are top of voters’ minds, housing is another pain point contributing to unease about the economy.

According to the national real estate brokerage company Redfin, about 53% of homeowners and renters said in February that the cost of housing will impact their pick for president.

“For so many Americans, the rest of the economy is doing well,” Redfin’s chief economist Daryl Fairweather said. “But people still feel like they aren’t economically successful. They can’t own a home, and homeownership is more unaffordable than it’s ever been.”

The issue has been noticed in the White House, where President Joe Biden has made housing a priority as he eyes a second term and prepares to go head-to-head in a debate this Thursday with former president Donald Trump in Atlanta.

Meanwhile, Trump has said he would tackle the housing shortage by cutting energy costs and interest rates to fuel the construction of new homes. Recently, his campaign has blamed illegal immigration for contributing to the high cost of housing, claiming people living in the country without permission are making the housing shortage worse.

Regardless of Trump’s position, the poor perception of the economy and the high cost of housing could imperil incumbents. But Biden’s message on housing affordability, which includes building more homes and providing relief to first-time buyers and renters, is likely to resonate with those down-ballot races in the battleground state of Georgia, according to Jonesboro Democrat and State Senator Gail Davenport.

Davenport is running unopposed this year in a redrawn district that includes parts of Clayton and Henry counties. But she says she often gets calls from voters shaken by rising home and rent prices.

“A lot of people don’t want to say it but it’s a housing crisis,” she said. “Everything out there is $300,000 or $350,000. A lot of people see that as not being affordable.”

‘We’re stuck’

After years of inertia, conservative lawmakers have joined liberals at the national, state and local levels in recognizing there is a housing affordability crisis and are doing something about it. And for the first time in decades, housing could be a major issue during a presidential campaign.

In Georgia, housing advocates have often lamented the slow progress made on safe and affordable housing. But this year, Gov. Brian Kemp signed into law the Safe at Home Act, which provides modest protections for people renting neglected homes. The legislature preserved the state’s low income housing tax credit after lawmakers proposed a bill, House Bill 1182, to cut it. The credit is currently the only state funding to create or preserve affordable housing for low-income Georgians, according to advocates. After the passage of the Safe at Home Act, they now have sights on repealing Georgia’s ban on rent control.

Nationally, Biden has narrowed his focus on housing policy during his State of the Union address in March. His budget for the fiscal year 2025 proposes investing $258 billion to build or preserve two million more homes — though some studies suggest that is not nearly enough to close the gap.

He proposed a $10,000 tax credit to help middle-income homebuyers trying to get into their first home and for people who sell their starter homes, and $25,000 in down payment assistance.

But Atlanta realtor Maura Neill said it is beyond the scope of national politicians to make housing more affordable in Atlanta and Georgia. She said she would have more faith that someone running for city council, the county commission or state legislature could tackle a problem which includes local zoning and permitting hurdles.

“I would be really wary of someone who’s running for national office who promises me that they’re going to fix housing affordability because they’re not here in Atlanta or in Alpharetta, or here in Roswell with boots on the ground” she said.

Nevertheless, housing is an issue among the voters Biden will need to win over if he wants to take the battleground state, including Democratic-heavy Clayton County.

Voting right activists told the AJC in May that votes shouldn’t be taken for granted in the county and that housing is a burning issue. They suggested that U.S. senators in the state might have heeded the warning. In May, U.S. Sens. Raphael Warnock and Jon Ossoff committed $500,000 in federal funding for a Habitat for Humanity development called Hannah Springs in Lovejoy. The same month, the senators jointly announced $80 million in investments in housing authorities across the state.

Though it still pales in comparison to cities like New York and Los Angeles, the median home list price in metro Atlanta rose 30% between May 2019 and May 2024, according to Zillow data, and the supply of new housing is not meeting demand, particularly in the metro area, where population growth has outpaced construction.

According to real-estate marketplace company Zillow, the average home price in Atlanta in May was almost $400,000. People buying a home in the U.S. need to make about $114,000 a year to buy the typical house, according to a March report by Redfin. That is 35% more than the median household income of $84,000.

Biden knows he must convince Black voters to win nationally and in Georgia, and the housing crisis may have hit that constituency hardest. Although metro Atlanta has the highest rate of Black home ownership among the most populous cities in the US, the home ownership rate is 25 percentage points lower than the white home ownership rate. The gap is almost 30 percentage points in Cobb and Gwinnett and almost 25 percentage points in Clayton, according to the Atlanta Regional Commission.

Median rents in Atlanta are hovering around $2,100 a month. Earlier this year, the Harvard Joint Center for Housing Studies published a rental housing report suggesting that almost half of all renters are cost-burdened; meaning more than 30% of their income goes towards rent and utilities.

Sigrid Pearson lives in a two-bedroom apartment in Atlanta and pays $1,200 a month. Working two jobs as a cleaner and cashier, she earns less than $20 an hour, spending about half of her income on rent.

“I can barely afford $1,200,” she told the AJC earlier this year. “I’m going to have to downsize because it’s getting too expensive. They raise the rent every year.”

Jim Parrott, Barack Obama’s policy advisor and a non-resident fellow at the Urban Institute’s Housing Financing Policy Center, said he expects housing to be a running theme of the 2024 campaign. He said the issue could impact state and local races in Georgia, especially if Biden’s campaign surrogates adopt housing as a talking point.

“We’re stuck. They [voters] can see that in two, three months, gas prices may be down, the price of milk may be down but they can see housing is not going to be down,” he said.

The challenges in Georgia for both renters and homebuyers are worsened by Wall Street investment in housing, according to some housing experts. Since the Great Recession of 2008, Greater Atlanta has become ground zero for institutional investment with corporations buying up thousands of single-family homes.

Towns said she is competing for homes in a market where inventory is already stretched thin.

“It’s not leaving a lot out there for people to have options,” she said.

Hurting incumbents

Parrott said it’s difficult to predict how much Trump will make housing a campaign issue. But the former landlord and real estate’s mogul’s first term in office offers some hints on how he could approach housing, if he is reelected.

His administration was hostile towards the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, installing Ben Carson, who had no experience in housing, to head the agency. Trump proposed painful cuts to federal affordable housing programs for low-income people and wanted to slash housing benefits. Each time, Congress rejected the proposals, according to the American Bar Association.

Trump discriminated against tenants when he was a landlord, added Porshalain White, Georgia state director for the Biden campaign.

“While Trump’s housing agenda would cut opportunities for home ownership for Black Georgians and make housing more expensive, President Biden and Vice President Harris have made tackling corporate greed and lowering costs a priority, and have proposed the boldest plan in a generation to lower housing costs and boost the housing supply,” White said in a statement.

Campaign spokeswoman Karoline Leavitt said Trump planned to fight illegal immigration, which she said was taking up available homes and driving up housing costs, and free up federal land for new construction. Campaign officials did not back up the claim on immigration and housing with research but said that it was “commonsense” that the millions of people without documentation are a factor in the increased demand for housing.

“On top of sky-high prices for rent, gas, and groceries, Bidenomics has made the American Dream of homeownership unreachable for young Americans and families across the country,” Leavitt wrote in an emailed statement.

It remains to be seen whether Biden’s proposals will be enough to persuade voters otherwise. Fairweather, of Redfin, said that one of the reasons people might have soured on the president could be rooted in housing.

“I think Biden is trying to change that sentiment by putting out policy and trying to paint himself as the person who’s going to solve the problem,” Fairweather said.

Judd Cramer is co-author of a National Bureau of Economic Research paper that attempted to unravel the mystery of why consumer sentiment about the economy was so negative with unemployment low and inflation falling.

The paper, published in February, suggested it could be explained, at least in part, by high borrowing costs.

“Home prices are up almost 50 percent since the start of the pandemic, while the 30-year mortgage rate has tripled since the historic lows of 2021,” the paper states. “Given that home prices remain at historic highs despite higher interest rates, the interest payment on a new 30-year mortgage for the average house has increased more than threefold since 2021.”

Cramer said voters in Atlanta and Georgia, just like voters in every other part of the country, know how difficult it is to buy a home right now. Not that long ago, rates were 3%. Now, they’re more than 7%.

“Nobody thinks it’s a good time to buy a home and I think that’s something that will certainly be hurting incumbents,” Cramer said.

Davenport agrees housing affordability is an issue that runs deep.

“No matter where you live or where your district lands, people in Georgia want a good quality of life. That trickles down to healthcare, education, jobs, the economy, and also housing,” she said.

For voters like Towns, the issue goes far beyond national politics. She said she would like to see more local officials advocating for affordable housing. When asked about who she would vote for, Towns demurred. But housing affordability will still be on her mind come November.

“I wish all parties would come together and see that there is a housing crisis,” Towns said. “I don’t know exactly who I’m going to vote for. I do know that it is a topic of discussion in our home.”

Biden claims an early debate win: RFK Jr.’s absence from stage

posted in: News | 0

Josh Wingrove | (TNS) Bloomberg News

President Joe Biden’s campaign already sees one victory from the upcoming debate with Donald Trump — the absence of third-party challenger Robert F. Kennedy Jr. from the stage.

Kennedy and other independent presidential contenders failed to meet the criteria to qualify for Thursday’s debate in Atlanta, according to host CNN, boosting Biden’s efforts to cast the 2024 race as a two-person contest between him and Trump.

The showdown comes as Biden looks to shore up the broad electoral coalition he’ll need to defeat Trump and his fervent conservative base. Some polls find Biden performing better against Trump head-to-head than in surveys where voters are presented with a larger pool of candidates, making it crucial for the Democrat to minimize the risk of his support draining away to outside challengers.

Biden’s team has sought to hammer the message that voters face a binary choice in November.

“It is Joe Biden or Donald Trump, and anyone that does anything but vote for Joe Biden is supporting Donald Trump,” Biden campaign chair Jen O’Malley Dillon said on a Puck podcast this week.

“There’s just one choice, and it’s before you on this stage,” she added.

A campaign adviser, speaking on condition of anonymity to discuss strategy, said they plan to use the debate to spur supporters to speak with undecided family and friends about their vote.

Kennedy has blasted CNN and the two major-party campaigns for his exclusion, claiming he met the debate criteria. “My exclusion by Presidents Biden and Trump from the debate is undemocratic, un-American, and cowardly,” he said in a statement.

Kennedy on Thursday plans to answer the same questions posed to Biden and Trump in a livestream concurrent with the televised main event.

The challenge posed by independents like Kennedy, Cornel West and Jill Stein won’t be neutralized by their failure to appear on the debate stage. The election could well be decided by just tens of thousands of votes scattered across as few as three battleground states, making the third parties potential spoilers.

Polls show Kennedy drawing from Biden and Trump voters in roughly equal measure, and both major-party campaigns have sought to discredit him among their supporters — while also trying to make him more appealing to the other side.

Indeed, the core of Kennedy’s support comes from so-called “double haters” — voters holding unfavorable opinions of both Biden and Trump. About three in 10 battleground-state voters who say they won’t vote for either major-party candidate would vote for Kennedy if he were an option, according to a Bloomberg News/Morning Consult poll last month.

Democrats have been engaged in a feverish push to keep Kennedy, a scion of one of their most famous dynasties, off ballots. Biden has touted the endorsements of other Kennedy family members to sideline his rival, the best polling independent in the U.S. in decades.

Trump has also intensified his attacks, casting Kennedy as a “Democratic plant.” Kennedy’s opposition to vaccine mandates, skepticism of gun-control measures and crusade against tech companies he accuses of censorship, align him closely with much of Trump’s base.

“I’d love to have him in the debate, but he’s got bad numbers,” Trump said earlier this month at a rally, claiming he and Biden would equally lose votes. “Kennedy probably takes 50-50, but he’s a fake,” Trump added.

The Kennedy campaign says it has filed to get on the ballot in 24 states totaling 348 electoral votes — more than the 270 needed to have a theoretical chance at winning the Electoral College. But his campaign remains mired in legal challenges in several of those states.

Kennedy also lags far behind the major-party candidates in fundraising, but got a boost by selecting Silicon Valley lawyer and philanthropist Nicole Shanahan as his running mate. Shanahan, the ex-wife of Google co-founder Sergey Brin, contributed $8 million to their campaign in April, taking advantage of federal law allowing candidates to donate unlimited amounts to support their own candidacy.

An AARP poll, released earlier this month, found Trump leading Biden among voters of all ages by 47% to 45% head-to-head. But in a wider field, Kennedy has 11% support, boosting Trump to a five-point edge over Biden at 42% to 37%.

Voters under age 50 are the likeliest to back third-party candidates, including 25% of voters 18 to 34, the poll found. Young voters were crucial to Biden’s 2020 victory but he faces the risk of weakened support fueled by disappointment over his handling of the Israel-Hamas war and other issues.

“Between Trump and Biden, right now, it’s a bigger threat to Biden,” pollster Bob Ward of Fabrizio Ward, LLC, which helped conduct the survey.

Another AARP pollster, John Anzalone, who also surveys for Biden’s campaign, cautioned it is still early and that billions in advertising will have an impact on the race.

On Thursday, Biden intends to outline his second-term agenda and highlight the contrast with Trump to frame the race as a choice between the two, O’Malley Dillon said.

“Him standing next to Donald Trump is the best way to show that,” she said.

——-

(With assistance from Gregory Korte and Stephanie Lai.)

___

©2024 Bloomberg L.P. Visit bloomberg.com. Distributed by Tribune Content Agency, LLC.