St. Paul driver gets a month in workhouse in hit-and-run that injured 2 pedestrians

posted in: News | 0

One of Pa Chia Vang’s hit-and-run victims walked with a cane to the witness stand, where she said her life will never be the same — physically, mentally and financially — because of what Vang did to her and her sister-in-law last May in St. Paul.

The woman, who is 52, is not able to perform everyday tasks or drive due to double vision.

“I can’t even pick up my grandchild, who is about 20 pounds, just to hug her,” she said in a Ramsey County courtroom on Tuesday at Vang’s sentencing.

Pa Chia Vang (Courtesy of the Ramsey County Sheriff’s Office)

The other victim, who is 48, was near the courtroom’s swinging door in a wheelchair. Her daughter delivered her victim impact statement in which she said “the chance to live a long, healthy and fulfilling life was stolen from me by someone who chose to run instead of taking responsibility.”

Vang, 45, occasionally wiped away tears.

Ramsey County District Judge Edward Sheu went on to give her 30 days in the workhouse — the most he could under a December plea agreement — and five years of probation for hitting the two women with her SUV as they crossed Idaho Avenue near White Bear Avenue shortly before midnight May 4, and then leaving the scene.

Vang wasn’t identified as a suspect until after police received an anonymous tip in the case a month later. She was charged July 11 by warrant and arrested the next day.

Vang had spent more than two hours at a bar and restaurant near the hit-and-run scene. When she pleaded guilty in December to criminal vehicular operation that caused substantial bodily harm and leaving the scene, she also said she had been drinking before the crash, according to Assistant Ramsey County Attorney Nelson Rhodus.

“But that wasn’t part of the elements of the offense, because we couldn’t prove that,” he said. “She had fled the scene already. So it was charged out as just a hit-and-run.”

Driver left scene while victims were ‘fighting for our lives’

When officers arrived at the scene, they found the 52-year-old victim lying on the ground near the parking lot of Exquisite Cake Bakery. She had a puddle of blood behind her head and St. Paul fire medics took her to the hospital, where she was diagnosed with fractured pelvic bones and spinal fractures.

“The driver left the scene with no regard for human life, while we were laying on the ground fighting for our lives,” she told the court Tuesday.

Medics brought the second victim to the hospital in critical condition. Her injuries included a skull fracture, a traumatic brain injury, fractured ribs and spinal injuries.

The criminal complaint says officers spoke to a witness who reported a sport-utility vehicle sped west on Idaho Avenue when the two women were crossing the street. The SUV struck both women and continued north on White Bear Avenue.

Surveillance video from the area showed the driver of the SUV appeared to brake upon impact and then the vehicle swerved before continuing on.

Officers also found two car parts that appeared to be left behind from the SUV. They were identified as coming from a BMW X5 that was made between 2000 and 2006.

Police had asked for tips in the case on June 5, while releasing a photo of the female suspect from White Dragon Hall and saying she drove a dark-colored vehicle.

An anonymous tip led to police identifying Vang as a suspect. The tipster reported that a woman who lived on Bradley Street near Arlington Avenue drove a black BMW SUV that may have been involved. On June 6, officers found a 2005 BMW X5 — with damage to its front end — parked on Bradley Street in front of Pa Chia Vang’s home.

Vang’s husband was the vehicle’s registered owner and she had her identification scanned at the White Dragon, the complaint says.

Surveillance video showed that a person who appeared to be Vang went into White Dragon at 9:26 p.m. on May 5 and left at 11:52 p.m. She “stumbled” as she left and someone helped her continue walking, according to the complaint.

‘Remorse is very real’

The plea agreement included a 30-day jail cap, supervised probation and 100 hours of community service. If Vang follows conditions of probation, her conviction will become a misdemeanor. It also included completing a chemical dependency evaluation, writing apology letters to the victims and attending a Mothers Against Drunk Driving impact panel, all things Vang did before Tuesday.

A second, lesser charge of criminal vehicular operation — causing great bodily harm and leaving the scene — was dismissed.

Prosecutor Rhodus told the court that he believes state sentencing guidelines are “quite light” for the offense when considering the harm typically caused is “so severe and has such a tremendous impact on the lives of those who are involved.” He asked Judge Sheu to give Vang the full 30 days.

Vang’s attorney, Jack Rice, said she has taken responsibility and her “remorse is very real.”

“I know that the court has read those apology letters that she wrote,” Rice told the court. “She truly meant it.”

Related Articles

Crime & Public Safety |


Ex-Isanti police officer admits to sending lewd photo to friend’s daughter

Crime & Public Safety |


Adnan Syed case: What Wednesday’s hearing means for the ‘Serial’ subject

Crime & Public Safety |


Feeding Our Future co-defendant jailed on alleged witness tampering attempt

Crime & Public Safety |


Detroit Lakes missionary’s wife formally charged with husband’s murder in Angola

Crime & Public Safety |


A French surgeon is on trial accused of raping or abusing 299 people, mostly child patients

Rice proposed three 10-day sentences, with the time served during the anniversaries of the crash. Sheu opted for Vang to serve the sentence at one time, beginning March 7.

Vang, who declined to address the court, must also pay a total of $151,476.78 in restitution to the two victims.

Sheu said he agrees with Rhodus that the “law in this area is actually kind of lenient, as you can see from the harm and damage caused.”

“I really feel the impact from the victims here,” he added. “They will face architectural barriers, among other things forever, possibly, which is tremendously hard to watch and understand. So I hope you don’t drink ever again, and can make it right financially with the victims.”

Trump says he will offer ‘gold cards’ for $5 million path to citizenship, replacing investor visas

posted in: Politics | 0

By ELLIOT SPAGAT, Associated Press

President Donald Trump said Tuesday that he plans to offer a “gold card” visa with a path to citizenship for $5 million, replacing a 35-year-old visa for investors.

Related Articles

National Politics |


Musk has inside track to take over contract to fix air traffic communications system

National Politics |


Trump directs government to consider possible tariffs on copper

National Politics |


Ukraine and US have agreed on a framework economic deal, Ukrainian officials say

National Politics |


White House says it ‘will determine’ which news outlets cover Trump, rotating traditional ones

National Politics |


Judge extends block on Trump administration’s sweeping freeze on federal funding

“They’ll be wealthy and they’ll be successful, and they’ll be spending a lot of money and paying a lot of taxes and employing a lot of people, and we think it’s going to be extremely successful,” Trump said in the Oval Office.

Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick said the “Trump Gold Card” would replace EB-5 visas in two weeks. EB-5s were created by Congress in 1990 to generate foreign investment and are available to people who spend about $1 million on a company that employs at least 10 people.

Lutnick said the gold card — actually a green card, or permanent legal residency — would raise the price of admission for investors and do away with fraud and “nonsense” that he said characterize the EB-5 program. Like other green cards, it would include a path to citizenship.

About 8,000 people obtained investor visas in the 12-month period ending Sept. 30, 2022, according to the Homeland Security Department’s most recent Yearbook of Immigration Statistics. The Congressional Research Service reported in 2021 that EB-5 visas pose risks of fraud, including verification that funds were obtained legally.

Investors’ visas are common around the world. Henley & Partners, an advisory firm, says more than 100 countries around the world offer “golden visas” to wealthy individuals, including the United States, United Kingdom, Spain, Greece, Malta, Australia, Canada and Italy.

Trump made no mention of the requirements for job creation. And, while the number of EB-5 visas is capped, Trump mused that the federal government could sell 10 million “gold cards” to reduce the deficit. He said it “could be great, maybe it will be fantastic.”

“It’s somewhat like a green card, but at a higher level of sophistication, it’s a road to citizenship for people, and essentially people of wealth or people of great talent, where people of wealth pay for those people of talent to get in, meaning companies will pay for people to get in and to have long, long term status in the country,” he said.

Congress determines qualifications for citizenship, but Trump said “gold cards” would not require congressional approval.

After win on wages, Minnesota Uber, Lyft drivers push for right to unionize

posted in: News | 0

A group of Minnesota ride-hailing service drivers is now pushing for the right to unionize after winning a minimum wage increase at the state Capitol last year.

Drivers for services like Uber and Lyft are working with state lawmakers on legislation to allow them to vote on forming a union — something they currently can’t do because they are considered independent contractors under federal law.

New minimum wages for ride-hailing drivers went into effect in December last year after a 2024 bill went into effect.

Democratic-Farmer-Labor lawmakers and others backing the new unionization bill, including the SEIU Local 26, say allowing drivers to organize will keep future wage disputes from ending up at the Legislature.

“The best way to hold these companies accountable is to give drivers a seat at the table,” said Sen. Zaynab Mohamed, DFL-Minneapolis. “Are these folks going to come every year and ask for us to do a pay increase or are we giving them power to negotiate with companies?”

Increasingly vocal

Ride-hailing service drivers, who are overwhelmingly immigrants and people of color, have become increasingly vocal in state and local politics in recent years over concerns about wages and treatment by companies.

Some drivers claim they have been locked out of the application due to complaints from customers, and that it is difficult to appeal suspensions. Uber can suspend drivers over reports of safety concerns.

Mohamed and Rep. Samakab Hussein, DFL-St. Paul, plan to introduce a bill to allow drivers to unionize, though it’s still being drafted. Mohamed said she expects the bill to get a Senate hearing once it has been filed.

It’ll face a steep climb in a legislature where a House split 67-67 between the parties will mean at least one Republican will have to support it — an unlikely prospect. And DFLers haven’t necessarily been unified behind past ride-hailing wage bills either.

Drivers had been pushing for minimum wages and other protections since 2023, but Gov. Tim Walz vetoed the first version of a wage bill that passed that year.

Uber statement

In a statement responding to the unionization bill push, Uber said the current minimum wage for drivers is among the country’s highest, and that it has been working with the Confederation of Somali Community and driver organizations to help drivers with any concerns they have with wages and access to their platform.

“Over the last few years, drivers, rideshare companies, and legislators worked collaboratively on addressing what drivers themselves established as their own priorities,” said Freddi Goldstein, a spokesperson for Uber. “It is not constructive to have late-to-the-game parties show up to risk what’s been achieved to advance their own interests.”

Drivers for services like Uber and Lyft are considered independent contractors, meaning they can’t form a union under federal law. Still, one other state has moved forward with a measure to grant ride-hailing service drivers the ability to organize.

In November, Massachusetts voters approved a ballot measure allowing drivers to form a union. Drivers can now organize if they want, and companies can negotiate as a group, the Associated Press reported.

The measure came after a wage win for drivers earlier in the year. Massachusetts’ attorney general settled with Uber and Lyft in June guaranteeing Uber and Lyft drivers a minimum pay standard of $32.50 an hour, according to the Associated Press.

Wage increase measure

Walz signed Minnesota’s minimum ride-hailing wage bill into law last year and it went into effect on Dec. 1, 2024.

The state now requires a wage of $1.28 per mile and $0.31 per minute — a compromise that came after Uber and Lyft threatened to pull out of the state when the Minneapolis City Council passed an ordinance setting the wage at $1.40 and $0.51, respectively.

A Minnesota study published in March 2024 — before the new wages took effect — found Twin Cities metro Uber and Lyft drivers made about $14.48 per hour on average after expenses like gas, insurance and wear-and-tear. That was below the Minneapolis minimum wage of $15.57.

The per-mile compensation rate would have to be $0.89 per mile and $0.49 per minute in order to reach Minneapolis minimum wage, according to the study from the Minnesota Department of Labor and Industry. When accounting for sick time, health insurance and retirement, the mileage rate needed to rise to at least $1.20.

Related Articles

Politics |


Minnesota bill would ban using AI to create sexually explicit images of real people

Politics |


Minnesota Republicans push fraud to center stage at state Capitol

Politics |


Minnesota House Republicans seek to ban transgender students from sports, locker rooms, restrooms

Politics |


Ellison: Trump order on transgender athletes violates Minnesota law

Politics |


Republican-backed bill fails in first floor vote in Minnesota House

Kathryn Anne Edwards: House Republicans’ budget plan gets poverty all wrong

posted in: Society | 0

House Republicans released a budget proposal that effectively calls for a $4.5 trillion tax cut funded by $1.5 trillion in reduced spending and borrowing the remaining $3 trillion. It should be a challenge to sell a bill that overwhelmingly benefits the wealthiest Americans at the expense of the least affluent on the heels of a pandemic-era economy that generated unfathomable riches for the former and job losses and steep inflation for the latter.

Yet proponents of the bill say it’s not about spending “cuts” but making programs less vulnerable to waste, fraud and abuse — in particular wasting benefits on people not worthy of them. As House Speaker Mike Johnson put it, “You know, work is good for you. You find dignity in work. And the people that are not doing that, we’re going to try to get their attention.”

Such thinking exposes a fundamental misunderstanding of poverty, one that disregards the economic reality of being a low-income American in favor of broad judgment and harsh policy. This approach has three pillars:

1. Poor people comprise a permanent underclass. They have always been poor, and their parents were probably poor, and their children will be too. They comprise an underclass that are unlike most Americans.

Wrong.

As of 2023, the poverty threshold for a family of four was $29,960 in annual income and $14,891 for an individual. According to the Census Bureau, which looked at longitudinal, monthly data on family income over a four-year period, 34% of Americans met the definition of being in poverty for at least two months, with most in poverty for less than a year. Some were in poverty all 48 months, but they accounted for just 2.8% of the total population and 8.2% of the ever-in-poverty population.

Federal Reserve researchers came to a similar result when looking at annual incomes in tax returns, finding 40% of Americans spend at least one year in poverty over a 10-year period. The dips into and out of poverty reflect an increasing trend of income volatility, meaning that income is both unpredictable and unstable.

Poverty isn’t a permanent state or something that afflicts a fixed group, but a risk that almost half of Americans face.

 

2. Poor people don’t work. What’s keeping people in poverty is a lack of motivation; they just need to get a job. A work requirement to receive public help is simultaneously draconian and tedious but also justified.

Wrong.

Work and poverty can and do overlap. The poverty rate for full-time, year-round workers is 4.1% and for part-time, year-round workers is 14.7%. But those are rates for continually employed individuals. A big predicter of poverty among workers is losing or leaving a job. Again, it’s easy to fall into the personal-failing narrative — they are bad or lazy workers — but keep in mind that many low-wage jobs are low enough in quality that they are hard to keep.

A study of paid leave laws also illuminates the challenges of keeping a low-wage, low-quality job. Some states and localities have instituted mandatory paid sick leave giving all employees the right to take off for illness without being fired and the ability to accrue paid sick time. Researchers found that such laws increase women’s employment by 1.2 percentage points and their earnings by $2,400 annually. The mechanism isn’t sick days themselves (i.e. they aren’t getting $2,400 from calling out sick) but job stability. It’s easier to hold a job when getting sick doesn’t result in being fired. Also, the researchers found the law also reduced the poverty rate for women.

Second, not everyone can work. The two most common reasons that prime-age adults have for not working is disability and caregiving. Were the labor market more hospitable to individuals with a limiting medical condition or to parents of young children, more would work. A lack of labor income may result in poverty, but that’s a function of the circumstances that prevent them from accessing the labor market and the earnings it provides.

Much like the fraction of the poor who meet the mythology of permanently poor, there is similarly a fraction who are not working, not disabled or not caregiving. But they are atypical.

 

3. Poor people get a lot of help from the government. Between cash, food, health, housing, and childcare, poor people lose money if they try to support themselves because they government already gives them so much.

Wrong.

On some level it comes down to what “a lot” means. Take individuals whose total cash income is less than half the poverty line (so about $8,000 a year). Among those 18 to 29 years old, 47% of their income comes from earnings and just 3% from government cash transfers. Among those 30 to 49 years old, it’s 40% earnings, 9% social security and 15% government cash transfers. (The remaining income comes for the 18- to 29-year-old group is 35% asset income and 14% other income. For the 30- to 49- year-old group it is 20% asset income and 16% other.) Put differently, even the poorest of poor households on average get more cash from working than the government.

Of course, the government is pretty stingy when it comes to actual cash help. There are about 20 million 18- to 64-year-olds who have low-enough cash income to be officially poor but just half a million get welfare benefits (Temporary Assistance to Needy Families) and 4 million get disability (Supplemental Security Income). The vast majority are not eligible for any cash.

In-kind is a different story — at least some of the time. Housing support and child-care support are incredible boons to families that qualify, but the benefits are rationed. About 4 million families get rental support and less than 1 million receive child-care vouchers. Again, most poor households do not get housing or child-care assistance. The real stalwarts of support for the low-income population are the entitlements to food and health, which the vast majority of poor and many not poor people receive. Some 17 million adults receive food stamps (Supplemental Nutrition Assistance, or SNAP) and 32 million are on Medicaid.

So it comes down to whether $2,388 a year in food vouchers (the average SNAP benefit) constitutes “a lot” or if $3,095 (the average spending per adult enrollee in Medicaid) is “a lot.” For reference, 13.6 million tax returns will claim the mortgage interest deduction this year, to the tune of about $2,000 per household.

These enduring poverty myths propel misguided policy like a tax cut financed via lower spending envisioned by Republicans. If the myths were true, the reasonable conclusion is that policy needs to fix these people. The economy is fine, the labor market is fine, the housing market is fine, health insurance is fine — it’s these people and their choices that need addressing.

But these myths aren’t true, which means that instead, policy needs to address the economic and labor market shortcomings that generate poverty and hardship. It puts into perspective just how much is lost with yet another sprawling, multi-trillion-dollar debt-financed tax cut (on the heels of similar cuts in 2001, 2003, 2012 and 2017). That’s a generation’s worth of government spending — of policy opportunities — squandered.

Kathryn Anne Edwards is a labor economist and independent policy consultant. She wrote this column for Bloomberg Opinion.