Anti-Israel protests on college campuses drive calls for increased safety

posted in: Politics | 0

NEW YORK — Friction is continuing on college campuses a day after a tense moment between Jewish students and participants in a pro-Palestinian rally at Cooper Union, heightening safety concerns amid ongoing clashes over the Israel-Hamas war.

Jewish leaders and students gathered Thursday afternoon on the Manhattan campus to condemn the college’s handling of the incident. Advocates said several Jewish students in the campus library felt threatened by protestors who shouted pro-Palestine messages and appeared to be intent on breaking into the library room.

“This school is in violation of the civil rights of these students,” said New York City Council Member Inna Vernikov — who was recently charged with gun possession after she protested against a pro-Palestinian rally.

“It is their job to protect Jewish students. Could you imagine this happening to any other ethnic minority in New York City?”

The clash at Cooper Union is the latest example of conflict between students and faculty on college campuses. Anxiety surrounding campus safety has been growing as protests erupt across the country over the conflict in the Middle East.

Columbia University earlier this week postponed a major fundraising drive following an assault on an Israeli student after he confronted a woman for tearing down posters with names of photos of Israelis that Hamas took as hostages and dueling demonstrations on campus.

And following an anti-Israel protest at Binghamton University, a student declared that “Israel is worse than Nazi Germany.” Jewish students, faculty and alumni at New York University, meanwhile, signed onto a letter this week condemning the institution’s lack of response to the rise in antisemitism.

Students at George Washington University in Washington, D.C., also projected pro-Hamas messaging onto campus buildings at night, with one reading “Glory to our Martyrs.”

And officials at Drexel University are investigating whether a Jewish student was the victim of a hate crime after the student’s dorm room door was set on fire.

Gerard Filitti, an attorney with the Lawfare Project — a group that defends Jewish people’s rights — wants to press criminal charges against the pro-Palestinian protestors at Cooper Union for menacing, as well as rioting and incitement charges. Students did not speak during the rally for safety reasons.

Cooper Union’s president, Laura Sparks, is now facing calls from advocates and students to step down.

Vernikov brought a pre-written resignation letter for Sparks to Thursday’s rally outside the library.

“We will demand the prosecution to the fullest extent of the law,” Filitti said. “We need to send a message in New York City and elsewhere that there are consequences for threatening and intimidating Jewish students or any other students.”

A spokesperson for Cooper Union said staffers remained with students in the library and Sparks was in the building until after the protesting students dispersed.

The school is reviewing reports and footage from the incident, boosted security and is contacting affected communities, the spokesperson said.

“The devastation and loss of life in Israel and Gaza are a cause of deep pain and anger for people around the world and in our own community,” the spokesperson said in a statement. “While we support our students’ right to peacefully protest and express themselves, a walkout on Wednesday reached an unacceptable level when protesting students entered a campus building and disrupted the learning environment.”

Sari, the mother of a Cooper Union graduate student who was in the library, said her daughter recounted the experience to her.

“She’s frightened,” Sari said during the rally, asking for her last name to be withheld for safety reasons. “She’s frightened to be on this campus.”

Several NYPD officers were on site at Cooper Union the day of the protest at the behest of school officials and accompanied roughly 20 pro-Palestinian protesters who made their way through the building, eventually arriving at the library.

NYPD Chief of Patrol John Chell on Thursday morning said that the doors to the library were closed, but not locked — contradicting reports from shaken students who said school administrators battened down the room as pro-Palestinian protesters banged on doors and large glass windows.

Officers later asked some of the Jewish students in the library if they needed assistance getting home, according to Chell, which they declined.

“There [were] no direct threats, there was no damage, there was no danger to any students in that school,” he said during a press briefing.

Mayor Eric Adams on Wednesday evening said his administration has been in contact with the school as well as law enforcement.

“While the students at Cooper Union have a right to peacefully protest, hate has no place in our city,” Adams said on X, the platform formerly known as Twitter. Gov. Kathy Hochul also shared a similar message of support.

The City University of New York has deployed public safety officers to spaces on campus where Jewish, Muslim and Arab students gather, CUNY Chancellor Félix Matos Rodríguez said in a letter to students and staff on Wednesday. A CUNY spokesperson referred POLITICO to the letter.

Matos Rodríguez noted that while the university is committed to free speech, students are prohibited from using university property and platforms, including computers or email addresses, to promote political activities or agendas.

When asked about the incident at Binghamton, a SUNY spokesperson declined comment. Earlier this month, SUNY Chancellor John King expressed support for the Jewish community and said resources are available for all students that request it. A Binghamton spokesperson did not immediately respond to requests for comment.

Students, staff and politicians implored school leaders to do more to safeguard students from hate speech and violent protests on campuses.

David Greenfield, a Brooklyn College adjunct law professor and CEO and executive director of the Met Council — the country’s largest Jewish charity dedicated to combating poverty — said institutions are not doing enough to draw the line between protecting free speech and ensuring students’ safety.

“These protests start as peaceful protests, but what ends up happening is more times than not, they end up as violent protests,” Greenfield said in an interview. “They start from a place of free speech and end in a place of hate speech and intimidation. And that’s a line that we cannot allow them to cross.”

Rep. Ritchie Torres (D-N.Y.) — an outspoken pro-Israel supporter — is holding a press conference Friday morning with Jewish students, parents, faith leaders and advocates to condemn antisemitism incidents on college campuses.

Assemblymember Nily Rozic, the first Israeli-born state assemblymember, blasted rampant antisemitism on campuses.

“The reality and illusions of safety on campus have almost completely disappeared — what a frighteningly dangerous time to be a Jewish student on any campus in New York,” Rozic, a Democrat, said in a statement. “There needs to be accountability from university and college presidents, particularly for any college or university that receives public funding. Antisemitism on campus cannot be tolerated — full stop.”

GOP Rep. Marc Molinaro — who authored legislation to promote the teaching of accurate Holocaust history in schools — said he was “deeply disturbed” by the Binghamton student’s invoking of Nazi Germany.

“Let me speak directly to the students who have launched these anti-Israel protests at colleges across America,” Molinaro said in a statement. “We will always respect — and fight — for your right to free expression. But we will never accept bigotry or outright idiocy. Please take the time to learn history, remember the past and open your eyes and minds to truth. We will not forget.”

New York GOP Chair Ed Cox said he would like to see the expulsion of students who resort to violent or threatening activities.

“Any foreign students participating in such activity should be deported from the United States,” Cox said in a statement.

Joe Anuta contributed to this report. 

Lewiston Democrat Jared Golden says he’s switching his position on banning assault weapons

posted in: Politics | 0

LEWISTON, Maine — U.S. Rep. Jared Golden, a Lewiston Democrat, said Thursday he was reversing his position on banning assault weapons, saying a horrific mass shooting in his hometown led him to believe the firearms should be prohibited.

Golden was one of four Democrats who voted in July 2022 against federal legislation that sought to ban certain types of semi-automatic weapons. But speaking to reporters inside Lewiston City Hall, Golden said after moments like the Wednesday mass shooting, “a leader is forced to grapple with things that are far greater than his or herself.”

It’s too soon to tell if his switch will spark a movement, but he said he must try.

“I have opposed efforts to ban deadly weapons of war, like the assault rifle used to carry out this crime,” he said. “The time has now come for me to take responsibility for this failure, which is why I now call on the United States Congress to ban assault rifles, like the one used by the sick perpetrator of this mass killing in my hometown of Lewiston, Maine.”

Golden said he would work with any colleagues to “get this done in the time that I have left in Congress.”

“To the people of Lewiston, my constituents throughout the second district, to the families who lost loved ones, and to those who have been harmed, I ask for forgiveness and support as I seek to put an end to these terrible shootings,” he said.

Golden’s reversal came at nearly the same moment Maine State Police said they were descending upon a home as they continued a massive manhunt for Robert Card, a 40-year-old man identified as a suspect in a mass shooting here that left 18 people dead and 13 wounded.

The shooting shattered lives in Lewiston, surrounding communities, and Maine, parents without children and people mourning the loss of their loved ones. Maine U.S. Sen. Susan Collins echoed sentiments Gov. Janet Mills expressed earlier Thursday, calling it a “dark day for the state of Maine.”

“This heinous attempt, which has robbed the lives of at least 18 Mainers and injured so many more, is the worst mass shooting that the state of Maine has ever experienced and could ever imagine,” Collins said.

Collins did not say whether she would support banning assault rifles, instead arguing federal lawmakers should outlaw high-capacity magazines.

“I think that would have more input and more effectiveness.”

Maine’s gun laws and consequences, explained

posted in: News | 0

Maine has relatively lax firearms laws but also boasts one of the lowest firearms related deaths rates in the country.

Maine does not have a “red flag” law which may have prevented a mass shooter in Lewiston from accessing the gun he used to kill more than a dozen, according to gun control advocacy groups, as early reporting indicates the shooter made specific threats of violence.

“The state does not have an Extreme Risk law, also known as a ‘red flag’ law, to empower families and law enforcement to prevent tragedies before they happen,” Everytown for Gun Safety, a gun control lobbying group, writes of the state.

A “yellow flag” system used in the state, that would have required the intervention of a medical professional and sworn testimony from a law enforcement official in order to remove the guns used in Wednesday’s shooting from the alleged killer’s possession, may have been helpful if implemented.

“Though Maine has taken some steps to keep guns out of the hands of those who shouldn’t have them, state leaders must do more to prevent gun violence,” Everytown writes.

Since 2015 Maine has been among the more than half of U.S. states that allows adults over the age of 21 to carry concealed handguns without a permit. Reporting indicates the shooter was armed with a long gun.

Gun sellers are not required to perform background checks for sales beyond those performed to comply with federal laws, which check mostly for criminal findings, and there is no waiting period required to take possession of a new gun.

There are no restrictions on the possession of popular shooting platforms like the AR-15 or magazine size.

Despite these apparently lax laws, according to data provided by the CDC, Maine also ranks fairly well when held against other states when it comes to gun violence. At a rate of 11.2 per 100,000, Maine’s yearly gun deaths are well below that 38 other states. Of 163 people shot and killed there annually, almost 90% die by their own hand.

Mike Preston’s Ravens mailbag: Answering questions about trade deadline, inconsistent offense, potential re-signings and more | COMMENTARY

posted in: News | 0

Baltimore Sun columnist Mike Preston will answer fans’ questions throughout the Ravens season. Coming off Baltimore’s 38-6 win in Week 7 against the Detroit Lions, plenty of questions remain heading into a Week 8 matchup against the Arizona Cardinals.

Here’s Preston’s take:

(Editor’s note: Questions have been edited for length and clarity.)

With the trade deadline looming, is there a particular player/position that you think the Ravens should pursue to strengthen the roster? — Paul in Orlando

The Ravens are in the same shape as several teams. They could use some help in many areas, including running back, offensive line and outside linebacker. That could change in a week or two, but right now the Ravens are 5-2 and there don’t seem to be any big names out there who would have a significant impact such as middle linebacker Roquan Smith did last year when he was acquired from the Chicago Bears. Except Tennessee Titans running back Derrick Henry. Can you imagine that guy in the Ravens’ backfield?

It might be wishful thinking right now, but you never know which player might be available. You look at some of the older players on the Ravens’ roster such as outside linebackers Jadeveon Clowney and Kyle Van Noy and wide receiver Odell Beckham Jr. and wonder whether they will hold up for the entire season.

Why do you think the Ravens offense has been so inconsistent, particularly in the second half of games? — Andy in Hagerstown

I think you can look at halftime adjustments and the lack of a killer instinct. The Ravens have had big leads in several games this season, so the emphasis isn’t on making changes but seeing what the opposing team does to slow them down. I’m not sure there has been that type of preparation, even though the Ravens finished strong against Detroit last week.

Even when doing well, coordinators need to plan for changes by the opposition and decide what their counter will be. Some have said the Ravens have been conservative on offense in the second half, but that’s not true. They’ve made mistakes and been inconsistent, especially passing the ball. They’ll need to improve in those areas if they want to advance deep into the postseason.

If Marlon Humphrey is considered a “lockdown” cornerback, why is it that opposing teams are regularly throwing to the receiver he is covering? — Jan

I’ve never considered Humphrey a lockdown or shutdown corner. I think he is a very good player and competes extremely hard, but there aren’t very many shutdown corners in the NFL similar to Deion Sanders or Darrelle Revis. Once a team finds one, they don’t let them leave.

Do you think the performances by the running backs on Sunday put an end to potential trade rumors? Both Justice Hill and Gus Edwards had rushes of 20-plus yards; is the running game’s potential more reliant upon the dominance of the offensive Line than who the running back is? — Seth Goldstein

Nope. There is always a need for running backs because they are so prone to injury, but I don’t see the Ravens making a trade unless they can upgrade what they already have. Both Hill and Edwards are limited; Edwards is good at running inside and Hill has the speed and burst to get outside and also become a weapon in the passing game on third down. The Ravens, though, would like a more complete back who can do all of those things, and that was supposed to be J.K. Dobbins’ role this season before he tore his Achilles tendon in Week 1. At this point, the Ravens will be open to a trade pending the cost and whether it would be a significant upgrade for the entire offense, not just the running game.

The way Patrick Queen, Geno Stone and Justin Madubuike have been playing so far this season, have they all priced themselves out of coming back for the Ravens next season? Or do you see a scenario where at least 2 of the 3 return? — Paul in Orlando

I said before the season started that Queen was going to have a big year because he has a complementary player at middle linebacker in Smith and is entering the final year of his rookie contract. If I were Queen, I would test the open market because his speed and experience make him attractive. The same can be said for Madubuike, who has improved each of his four seasons. His quickness and penetration allow him to disrupt the running game, but he has also become a force as a pass rusher. He hasn’t maxed out his potential yet.

It will be hard for the Ravens to re-sign both, especially since they signed Smith to a five-year, $100 million contract extension toward the end of last season. As for Stone, he’s had an exceptional first half of the season. He is an extremely intelligent player who relies more on awareness than athleticism and is willing to make the most of every opportunity. It all depends on the Ravens’ salary cap situation and bids from other teams, but all three have earned themselves a big payday.

With both Smith and quarterback Lamar Jackson under big contracts, the Ravens might have trouble re-signing any of those players, with the possible exception of Stone.

Have a question for Mike Preston? Email sports@baltsun.com with “Ravens mailbag” in the subject line and it could be answered in The Baltimore Sun.

()