Harris accepts rules for Sept. 10 debate with Trump on ABC, including microphone muting

posted in: Politics | 0

By MEG KINNARD and MICHELLE L. PRICE Associated Press

WASHINGTON (AP) — Vice President Kamala Harris has accepted the rules set forth for next week’s debate with former President Donald Trump, although the Democratic nominee says the decision not to keep both candidates’ microphones live throughout the matchup will be to her disadvantage.

The development, which came Wednesday by way of a letter from Harris’ campaign to host network ABC News, seemed to mark a conclusion to the debate over microphone muting, which had for a time threatened to derail the Sept. 10 presidential debate at the National Constitution Center in Philadelphia.

Harris’ acceptance of the debate rules came as Trump — using a night he had proposed as a debate with Harris on Fox News Channel — instead participated in a solo town hall with host Sean Hannity in Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, a version of debate preparation with a longtime ally who queried him about his plans to take on the Democratic nominee.

President Joe Biden’s campaign had made the muting of microphones, except for the candidate whose turn it is to speak, a condition of his decision to accept any debates this year. Some aides have said they now regret that decision, saying voters were shielded from hearing Trump’s outbursts during the June debate. A disastrous performance for the incumbent Democrat fueled his exit from the campaign.

Once Harris rose in Biden’s stead and became their party’s pick for president, her campaign had advocated for live microphones for the whole debate, saying previously that the practice would “fully allow for substantive exchanges between the candidates.”

But on Wednesday, in a letter obtained by The Associated Press, Harris’ advisers wrote that the former prosecutor will be “fundamentally disadvantaged by this format, which will serve to shield Donald Trump from direct exchanges with the Vice President.”

“We suspect this is the primary reason for his campaign’s insistence on muted microphones,” her campaign added.

Despite those concerns, Harris’ campaign wrote, “we understand that Donald Trump is a risk to skip the debate altogether, as he has threatened to do previously, if we do not accede to his preferred format.” So as not to “jeopardize the debate,” Harris’ campaign wrote, “we accepted the full set of rules proposed by ABC, including muted microphones.”

According to an official with Harris’ campaign, a pool of journalists will be on hand to hear what the muted candidate may be trying to say when his or her microphone is turned off. That detail was not in the full debate rules, also released Wednesday by ABC, which are essentially the same as they were for the June debate between Trump and Biden.

The network laid out parameters from the basic format — 90 minutes, with two commercial breaks — to specifications that moderators David Muir and Linsey Davis “will be the only people asking questions,” perhaps hoping to avert a free-for-all between the candidates.

“Moderators will seek to enforce timing agreements and ensure a civilized discussion,” the network noted.

Related Articles

National Politics |


House readies to help bald eagle soar as national bird

National Politics |


Donald Trump says he can stabilize prices. Does his plan make sense?

National Politics |


JD Vance’s Catholicism helped shape his views. So did this little-known group of Catholic thinkers

National Politics |


Voters will decide minimum wage ballot measures in several states

National Politics |


America is trying to fix its maternal mortality crisis with federal, state and local programs

The Harris campaign official, who spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss planning around the debate, said a candidate who repeatedly interrupts will receive a warning from a moderator, and both candidates’ microphones may be unmuted if there is significant crosstalk so the audience can understand what’s happening.

After a virtual coin flip held Tuesday and won by Trump, the GOP nominee opted to offer the final closing statement, while Harris chose the podium on the right side of viewers’ screens. There will be no audience, written notes or any topics or questions shared with campaigns or candidates in advance, the network said.

In the town hall on Wednesday, Hannity steered Trump through many of the topics typical of the GOP nominee’s campaign events, with a heavy focus on immigration, and posed questions after showing video clips of Harris in media interviews and other appearances.

Trump also repeatedly returned his focus from Harris to Biden, calling Democrats’ substitution of their top candidate “a coup” and saying he would have preferred a debate with Harris, rather than the town hall.

Asked about next week’s debate, Trump repeated his former criticism of ABC as a “dishonest” and “unfair” network, also reiterating his previous claims that Harris’ campaign is “going to get the questions in advance.”

The location of Trump’s town hall, coupled with next week’s debate in Philadelphia, highlights the importance of battleground Pennsylvania, where 19 Electoral College votes are up for grabs in the November election.

Price reported from Harrisburg, Pennsylvania. AP White House Correspondent Zeke Miller contributed to this report.

Related Articles

National Politics |


Carl P. Leubsdorf: They’re all ‘flip-floppers’

National Politics |


That photo of people wearing ‘Nebraska Walz’s for Trump’ shirts? They’re distant cousins

National Politics |


House readies to help bald eagle soar as national bird

National Politics |


Donald Trump says he can stabilize prices. Does his plan make sense?

National Politics |


JD Vance’s Catholicism helped shape his views. So did this little-known group of Catholic thinkers

Can Harris prosecute the political case against Trump? Key questions ahead of their debate

posted in: Politics | 0

By STEVE PEOPLES AP National Political Writer

NEW YORK (AP) — Donald Trump and Kamala Harris will debate for the first — and perhaps, last — time on Tuesday night as the presidential candidates fight to sway voters on the biggest stage in U.S. politics.

The meeting comes just 75 days after President Joe Biden’s disastrous debate performance triggered a political earthquake that ultimately forced him from the race. Few expect such a transformative result this time, but Trump is on a mission to end Harris’ “honeymoon.”

Harris, a former courtroom prosecutor, will enter the night with relatively high expectations against a Republican opponent with 34 felony convictions and a penchant for false statements. The question is whether Harris, who did not particularly stand out during primary debates in her 2020 presidential campaign, can prosecute Trump’s glaring liabilities in a face-to-face meeting on live television with the world watching.

The 90-minute meeting begins at 9 p.m. ET Tuesday inside Philadelphia’s National Constitutional Center. It will be moderated by ABC News anchors David Muir and Linsey Davis. In accordance with rules negotiated by both campaigns, there will be no live audience.

Here’s what we’re watching for on a historic night:

Can Harris do what Biden could not?

Biden set an incredibly low bar for Harris in the June 27 debate. The president struggled to offer coherent arguments or even finish his sentences. But the anti-Trump coalition was most disappointed that he failed to take advantage of Trump’s obvious political liabilities — whether on abortion, the Jan. 6 Capitol attack, character issues or his legal trouble.

Harris is expected to do much better. Polls suggest the Democratic vice president is now even with the Republican former president in some swing states.

But even with such fertile terrain, scoring points against Trump on the debate stage is easier said than done. Trump may be the most experienced debater in modern presidential history. As a former reality television star, he knows how to dominate television coverage. And he clearly likes to fight.

Harris recently suggested that she may be looking forward to a political brawl. “Donald,” she told a cheering audience last month in Atlanta, “if you’ve got something to say, say it to my face.”

Can she back up the tough talk? The world is about to find out.

Can Trump focus?

Trump is not known for his discipline or preparation. His debate performances, like his governing style, are typically fueled much more by instinct than thoughtful analysis.

Therefore, few expect Trump to offer a clear and concise line of attack against Harris on Tuesday night. Still, he needs to do better than the kitchen-sink approach he’s been testing on the campaign trail for much of the last month.

Trump has questioned Harris’ racial identity. He’s falsely called her a communist. He’s questioned her strength. He’s jabbed her as a San Francisco liberal. And he’s reminded voters that she has served in the Biden White House for nearly four years and would presumably continue the president’s policies for another four years if she wins.

It is the Biden connection that many Republicans, inside and outside of Trump’s campaign, believe is most effective. They want him to evoke Ronald Reagan’s 1980 debate-stage jab — “Are you better off?” — early and often.

The question is whether Trump can deliver that message in a way that isn’t immediately overshadowed by a much more controversial statement. Recent history offers reasons to be skeptical.

Body language matters

There will, of course, be an obvious gender dynamic on stage Tuesday night.

Fair or not, body language and tone are viewed differently in a debate between a man and a woman. Just ask Hillary Clinton. She said Trump made her “skin crawl” when he stood behind her as she was speaking during a town hall-style debate in 2016.

The candidates — who have never met in person before — will be expected to stay behind their podiums on Tuesday night. But Republicans are hopeful that Trump will avoid any other provocations like pointing, yelling or otherwise approaching Harris in a way that might be off-putting to suburban women or other swing voters.

Harris, too, will face unique challenges related to her race and gender as voters consider whether to make her the nation’s first female president. Some voters still say they’re not comfortable with the idea. If she comes across as angry, she risks playing into racist tropes about Black women.

Related Articles

National Politics |


Harris accepts rules for Sept. 10 debate with Trump on ABC, including microphone muting

National Politics |


House readies to help bald eagle soar as national bird

National Politics |


Donald Trump says he can stabilize prices. Does his plan make sense?

National Politics |


JD Vance’s Catholicism helped shape his views. So did this little-known group of Catholic thinkers

National Politics |


Voters will decide minimum wage ballot measures in several states

While the gender dynamic looms, do not underestimate the significance of their age difference, either.

Harris is almost two decades younger than the 78-year-old Trump. Age was viewed as a political advantage for Trump when he was facing the 81-year-old Biden, but the situation is now reversed against the 59-year-old Harris. If he wins, Trump would be the oldest U.S. president ever elected.

The format will be somewhat different as well, in accordance with a set of rules the candidates agreed upon this week.

There will be no live audience, no opening statements and no props allowed. Candidates’ microphones will be muted when their opponent is on the clock, a stipulation that created some controversy in recent days.

Trump reluctantly agreed to the mute function when he faced Biden in June, but after that debate, his team determined it was a net positive if voters did not hear from the Republican former president while his opponent was speaking. Harris’ team was pushing to return to a normal format without mute buttons.

Abortion vs Immigration

Policy sometimes plays second to personality in presidential debates, but there are dramatic differences between the candidates on key issues that are on the minds of millions of voters.

Republicans hope Trump makes immigration a defining issue of the debate.

The GOP has effectively condemned the Biden administration’s handling of illegal immigration at the U.S.-Mexico border for much of the last four years. Once an issue that appealed mostly to the Republican base, illegal immigration — and related concerns about drugs, crime and national security — is now a top issue for voters across the political spectrum.

Harris will be eager to remind voters that Trump helped kill a bipartisan immigration bill that would have done much to fix the problem. But overall, Harris is likely to be on the defensive when the issue comes up.

Democrats, meanwhile, want to focus on abortion.

Trump, of course, appointed three Supreme Court justices who later overturned the landmark Roe v. Wade decision that protected a woman’s right to choose abortion. Trump has repeatedly said he was proud that Roe was defeated. But aware that such a view isn’t popular among many women, he has tried to moderate his stance on the divisive issue.

Harris won’t make that easy. Stating the obvious, as a woman, she is positioned to be a much more effective messenger on the issue than Biden was. And Trump can’t afford to lose many more female voters.

Look out for wild card Trump

If you ask Trump’s previous debate opponents what they’re watching for on Tuesday night — and we did — many say the same thing: Look out for the thing he says or does that Harris can’t possibly prepare for.

Trump is the ultimate wild card who has found tremendous political success by ignoring the traditional rules of politics. He will say or do whatever he thinks is best in the moment. And Harris, who has dedicated several days to debate prep, can’t make a plan for everything.

At this point, it’s hard to imagine Trump surprising anyone with new material. He has praised dictators, talked about genitalia size, suggested suspending the U.S. Constitution and said that Harris only recently “turned Black.”

Trump’s own team doesn’t know what he’ll do or say on any given day. That’s incredibly risky for Trump. But it also puts enormous pressure on Harris.

Gophers football vs. Rhode Island: Keys to game, how to watch and who has edge

posted in: News | 0

MINNESOTA vs. RHODE ISLAND

When: 11 a.m. Saturday
Where: Huntington Bank Stadium
TV: Peacock
Radio: KFXN-FM, 100.3 FM
Weather: Sunny, 61 degrees, 4 mph south wind

Records: Minnesota (0-1) had a slew of errors — including a missed last-second field goal — result in 19-17 home loss to North Carolina on Aug. 29. Lower-level FCS program Rhode Island (1-0) produced a go-ahead touchdown with 19 seconds left for a 20-17 home win over Holy Cross last Saturday.

History: This is the first matchup between the two programs. The Gophers are 61-4 all-time against FCS schools, including six in a row after a 37-24 loss to North Dakota State in Jerry Kill’s first year in 2011.

Big question: Can the Gophers eliminate the multitude of mistakes that tripped them up in season opener? Minnesota had three defensive penalties erase their own drive-altering plays and result in 10 UNC points; special teams had two missed field goals; and the offensive line had five sacks allowed.  If the Gophers don’t clean up those errors, it could be recipe for an upset.

Key matchup: Rhode Island quarterback Devin Farrell vs. Gophers defense. The athletic dual-threat Virginia Tech transfer totaled 341 yards (career-best 287 passing and team-high 54 rushing) in the comeback win in Week 1. Minnesota’s defense had a stunning 22 missed tackles against UNC. Rams run an option offense that will necessitate U defenders to make tackles in space.

Who has the edge?

Gophers offense vs. Rhode Island defense: At New Hampshire last season, QB Max Brosmer went 41 of 60 for 430 yards and two touchdowns against Rhode Island. He and offensive coordinator Greg Harbaugh have been working on incorporating some things he did versus Rams a year ago into how they can be successful on Saturday. In his first FBS game, Brosmer settled in after a slow start and competed 62 percent of passes (13 of 21) for 165 yards. He added a rushing touchdown, but lost a fumble on a carry. … WR Daniel Jackson (undisclosed injury) played in the opener after missing extended time in preseason camp. The fifth-year player, who had a team-high four receptions for 55 yards, said he felt good on the field: “I feel great. … Getting out there gave my body more of a spark back.” … RB Darius Taylor (hamstring) was sidelined in the first game. Head coach P.J. Fleck said Taylor is close to returning but it’s unclear if that will be Saturday. Marcus Major filled in with a career-high 20 carries for 73 yards. … While Minnesota’s offensive line gave up five sacks, Rhode Island’s defense didn’t register one in Week 1, so the U needs to bring this number down around zero in Week 2. EDGE: Gophers

Gophers defense vs. Rhode Island offense: New CB Ethan Robinson, who transferred in from FCS-level Bucknell, knows how hungry Rhode Island will be on Saturday. “The opportunity. It’s not really going to be pressure for them, but they are definitely going to want to make a statement.” … Rhode Island had six fumbles and lost three last week, including Farrell putting four on ground and losing one. The Gophers nearly had a two fumble recoveries a week ago, but a penalty and a lucky bounce didn’t result in takeaways. DC Corey Hetherman mentioned this as an area to exploit this week. CB Justin Walley’s interception return vs. the Tar Heels went 70 yards and matched Coleman Bryson’s 70-yarder in the 2022 Pinstripe Bowl. Walley mentioned postgame how he played running back in high school in Mississippi. … The Rams were 8 for 11 on third downs and 3 for 3 on fourth downs last week, while the Gophers allowed North Carolina to go 8 for 17 on conversions. … NB Jai’Onte’ McMillan played eight snaps vs. UNC before exiting with an apparent ankle injury. … One Gophers talking point this week was how the Rams have speed at skill positions. EDGE: Gophers 

Special teams: After making 85 percent of his field goals last season, Dragan Kesich missed two of three in the opener, including a 47-yarder as time expired. … Mark Crawford averaged 45 yards on six punts, including two inside the 20. … Minnesota continued to be non-threatening on returns vs. UNC. … Rhode Island kicker Ty Groff made both field goals, each within 27 yards, in opener. The Rams also didn’t muster many return yards against Holy Cross. EDGE: Gophers

Prediction: The Big Ten went 6-0 against FCS schools by an average margin of 39-4 in Week 1. Minnesota gets in on the gravy train against the lower level teams this week. But more importantly, the U cleans up mistakes that hurt all three units in opener. Gophers, 30-10

Related Articles

College Sports |


Gophers football missed whopping 22 tackles in loss to North Carolina

College Sports |


Gophers men’s basketball nets commitment from Pennsylvania guard

College Sports |


How the Gophers are handling star prospect Koi Perich

College Sports |


Gophers football: Perspective on Big Ten opponents is key after season openers

College Sports |


How long might injured Gophers running back Darius Taylor be out?

Another Hot Summer Tests the MTA’s Cooling Efforts

posted in: News | 0

In the face of climate change, the MTA must deal with excessive heat in its subway system and find ways to keep over 3 million daily riders cool.

Left: A fan blowing over passengers in the Times Square station. Right: The 34 St-Hudson Yards station, which has been fitted with integrated cooling technologies. (Credit: Jayleen Torres, Emmanuel Brown)

This story was produced by student reporters in City Limits’ CLARIFY News program, with instruction and editing by Julian Roberts-Grmela.

As 19-year-old Clara Medeiros steps into the 1 train, she’s met with an overwhelming heat, forcing her to scramble in search of a chilled car. This is routine for Medeiros, who takes the train every day to the Borough of Manhattan Community College.

“I’ve witnessed incidents of people fainting,” said Medeiros. “It can get really uncomfortable and unsafe for passengers, especially during the hot months.”

Over 3 million commuters each day rely on the MTA’s subway service, just like Medeiros. Subway cars have recorded temperatures as high as 98 degrees, and stations as high as 95 degrees. While the MTA says that 99 percent of trains have functional air conditioning, many commuters told City Limits they’ve encountered gaps in the cooling system.

For Jordan Romano, a 24-year-old retail clerk, the lack of functional air conditioning is most pronounced on subway lines that are numbered. Gothamist reported this summer that subway cars on the 1 train were particularly hot.

“You get on the train and it’s like, ‘Oh my God, it’s so hot, and I need to leave so I don’t die,’ and then the door’s locked, and you’re stuck in there,” Romano said.

Although Romano’s main grievances lie with train cars, others are more concerned with the stations’ temperatures. Michael Vodzogbe, a 23-year-old student attending SUNY Oswego, said subway platforms are “ridiculously hot.”

“My problem is really with the station itself. It’s always hot, dirty, nasty, funky, musty, all that,” Vodzogbe said. “It feels like I’m in pollution. Like the fumes, I can taste the heat.”

The heat is more than just an annoyance, though. Health Matters, New York-Presbyterian Hospital’s official media outlet, says heat exposure can lead to heat exhaustion, symptoms of which include sweating, nausea, and an accelerated heartbeat. With extended heat exposure, heat exhaustion can lead to heat stroke, which can be deadly.

No one is safe from heat stroke, but groups like older adults, those with chronic health conditions, and people who are less able to communicate their discomfort—such as small children—are most at risk, according to Health Matters.

Karen Carpenter, a 65-year-old theater director, has experienced these difficulties first-hand. “I carry a little fan with me, and I carry ice water,” Carpenter said. “Luckily, because I have a cane, people usually give me a seat, so at least I get to sit down.” 

The often deep and outdated designs of many subway stations can make the task of keeping people cool a daunting one, according to Drew Maggio, the technical director of Highmark Building Efficiency. Maggio worked alongside the MTA on his capstone project at Stevens Institute of Technology to investigate overheating in subways and their stations.

“Most subway tunnels are designed to take advantage of an effect known as ‘piston wind.’ Just like the piston in a bike pump, a train entering the station displaces air and forces it out through sidewalk grates or [a] station entrance,” said Maggio. “As the train departs the station, it draws fresh outside air into the station behind it, similar to a syringe being filled when the plunger is raised.”

The cooling of subway cars comes at a cost: the heat produced by air conditioners on subways is expelled into the stations, adding to the discomfort. “Stations deeper underground are more susceptible to this ‘sticking effect’ because the heat is absorbed into the surrounding earth over time,” Maggio noted, explaining why deeper and older stations are frequently much hotter.

During heat waves, the MTA deploys additional staffers to conduct “heat patrols” that check stations and train cars for potential issues, officials said at a press conference earlier this summer outlining its heat mitigation efforts.

Marc A. Hermann / MTA

MTA officials providing an update on plans to mitigate heat in the transit system on Jun 18, 2024, ahead of a heat wave.

The MTA has also built integrated cooling systems in select stations, including those along the Second Avenue line, the South Ferry Terminal, and 34 St-Hudson Yards, all of which were built between 2009 and 2015. The Grand Central-42 St 4/5/6 platform has been retrofitted with air coolers, while fans have been added to improve circulation at the Times Square-42 St Shuttle platform, Grand Central 7 platform, 14 St-Union Square 4/5/6 platform, Wall Street 2/3, and Bowling Green 4/5 stations.

Police officer Rob Almanza, 26, who is stationed in 34 St-Hudson Yards eight hours a week, believes that there’s a difference, saying the station has “better airflow” than others and that the “air feels clean.”

For stations with fans, the reviews are mixed. Even though the fans are supposed to cool passengers down, some say they don’t notice a difference. At the Times Square-42 St station, Jason Scurti, a 53-year-old attorney and frequent subway rider, said platforms with fans, like the one he was standing on, “seem pretty much the same” as those without.

In September, the MTA put out a request for information for cooling technologies on subway platforms, particularly for passenger-occupied portions of stations. In a press release accompanying the request, the MTA highlighted the urgency of addressing extreme heat.

“According to the New York City Panel on Climate Change, [there] will be up to three times as many days with temperatures over 90 degrees and up to nearly four times as many heat waves in the 2030s compared to recent years,” the agency said.

Unfortunately for New Yorkers, additional solutions likely won’t be clear until the MTA unveils its 2025-2029 Capital Program in the fall. The program, which details the MTA’s budget and projects for the next five years, will be crucial to the future of the MTA’s climate resiliency efforts. Long term projects such as flood prevention will be funded by the capital budget, while smaller repairs to air conditioners fall under the operating budget. 

That plan certainly will not solve all of the MTA’s problems, as the MTA faces a significant financial shortfall that threatens its climate resilience projects. State Comptroller Thomas P. DiNapoli estimates a $25 billion gap in the 2025-2029 capital program, partially due to the recent pause on congestion pricing that has forced the MTA to delay $16.5 billion in essential infrastructure improvements.

Congestion pricing’s pause has led to doubts from environmentalists over whether a sufficient amount of money will be allocated to dealing with environmental problems and other high-priority work. Officials have warned that plans to expand underground air circulation are in jeopardy, largely due to the delay of congestion pricing, which would have raised $1 billion each year.

The mounting uncertainties have led to advocacy groups calling for Gov. Kathy Hochul to reinstate the congestion tolling plan.

“Without congestion pricing, not only will the MTA have to cut essential capital upgrades, it will also be forced to cut service and resiliency projects in future capital programs,” said Danny Pearlstein, the policy and communications director of Riders Alliance, a group dedicated to fighting for better public transit in New York.

Hochul has maintained that congestion pricing—which would have tolled drivers below 60th Street in Manhattan, most of them at the cost of $15 a day—is too much of a financial hardship.

“For over 100 years, we have been successfully funding the MTA. There are other sources of funding,” the governor said on WNYC’s All Things Considered this week, saying she will explore alternative sources with lawmakers when the state legislative session resumes in January. “We will make up the difference. I am committed to making sure that the capital plan is funded.”

Don Pollard/Office of Governor Kathy Hochul

Gov. Hochul at a rally in support of congestion pricing in 2023. She backtracked on that support in June, halting the tolling plan just weeks before implementation.

While not cheap, there are solutions to heat-proofing transit stations that have been proven successful in Europe and Asia, including screen doors and dampers (doors in air ducts that open and close) that reduce the heat going into stations by taking advantage of piston wind, according to Maggio.

He believes that the MTA should remodel older stations to include cooling technologies, as many stations are too old to be fitted with effective cooling methods. While the obvious obstacle is the cost, Maggio believes he has a solution: selling off excess thermal energy. A similar effort has been tried out in London, where energy generated by the Underground is being used to heat homes

The MTA could have a “near 100 percent profit margin with relatively few up-front investments,” according to Maggio, allowing for the project to fund renovations for subway stations. It would also help the battle against climate change, as buildings currently produce 50 percent of the city’s total carbon output but could produce less with this plan.

While progress has been slow, the MTA has recognized the importance of the issue, he said. “They are cooperating with engineering firms, building owners, and NYSERDA to perform feasibility studies,” said Maggio. “They’ll be quantifying the heat available for recovery, and developing a framework so that this can be replicated across the city.”

Even if the MTA follows Maggio’s proposal, there is still much work to be done, and  there will still need to be more funding to maintain air conditioners and build newer stations. Many transit advocates, like Riders Alliance’s Pearlstein, believe the only way forward is to raise funds through congestion pricing.

“Governor Hochul needs to implement congestion pricing so the MTA can afford to replace aging train cars with faulty air conditioning and run frequent service so riders aren’t stuck on overheated platforms,” said Pearlstein. “The MTA employs 70,000 people and moves 7 million people every day. No one has to love it, but New York depends on it utterly.”

City Limits’ youth journalism program is generously supported by the Pinkerton Foundation, Harman Family Foundation and DJ McManus Foundation. Click here to apply for the Fall 2024 session of CLARIFY.

To reach the editor, contact Jeanmarie@citylimits.org