Waiting for a mentor: August

posted in: All news | 0

Kids ‘n Kinship provides friendships and positive role models to children and youth ages 5-16 who are in need of an additional supportive relationship with an adult. Here’s one of the youth waiting for a mentor:

First name: August

Age: 7

Interests: Her favorite foods are Macaroni, chicken! She likes to learn, explore outside, visit new places, and paint.  She likes to go swimming and she suggested a fun outing with her mentor would be to go to the beach. She enjoys makeup and musicals as well as dress up and cooking, loves movies and shows, and is very helpful.

Personality/Characteristics:  She describes herself as nice, funny, and goofy!  She might be shy and quiet, but not for long! When she’s comfortable she becomes loud and active, hyper at times.

Goals/dreams: Her three wishes would be to: 1) Have a baby fox as a pet 2) Have a pet panda 3) Be a cat!  When she grows up she wants to be a police officer. Her mom hopes a mentor will provide her with someone safe to connect with who shares the same interests as her and provide her with some new adventures. A mentor who could guide and role model emotional control and teach her to express herself better would be a great fit!

For more information: August is waiting for a mentor through Kids n’ Kinship in Dakota County. To learn more about this youth mentoring program and the 39+ youth waiting for a mentor, sign up for an Information Session, visit www.kidsnkinship.org or email programs@kidsnkinship.org. For more information about mentoring in the Twin Cities outside of Dakota County, contact MENTOR MN at mentor@mentormn.org or fill out a brief form at www.mentoring.org/take-action/become-a-mentor/#search.

Related Articles


South St. Paul: Woman has life-threatening injuries after vehicle apparently struck her


Hastings: U.S. 61 reconstruction updates at Tuesday public meeting


Mark Glende: Rhythm and ritual — the annual awakening of the furnace


St. Paul PD’s first AI policy: How is it being used and what’s next?


Waiting for a mentor: Zeek

How Your NYC Neighborhood Voted On The Housing Ballot Measures

posted in: All news | 0

A majority of New Yorkers voted to pass ballot measures that change the land use process for affordable housing. But Republican districts and neighborhoods that built less housing are still resistant to the changes.

The map above shows how neighborhoods voted on Proposal 2, which creates a “fast track” approval option for affordable housing projects. Blue indicates areas where a majority voted in favor, and pink voted against the measure. (Patrick Spauster/City Limits)

A total YIMBY victory?

Two weeks ago, New Yorkers passed three housing ballot measures that change how affordable housing projects get permitted, with each receiving more than 56 percent of the vote across the five boroughs.

It was a win for the so-called “Yes in My Backyard” movement, which encourages the production of more housing to control rising costs.

But not every part of the city gave the ballot measures the thumbs up. 

Voters in City Council districts that built more affordable housing over the past five years approved the measures with a two-thirds margin. Those that built less were 13 points behind, with 53 percent voting to advance them. Voters also disapproved the measures in five out of six districts represented by Republicans.

Those districts that built less were precisely the target of some of the reforms, which supporters say will ensure all neighborhoods chip in to building housing amid a citywide shortage.

The ballot measures move some of the City Council’s land use authority to boards with members appointed by the mayor. Proposal 2 creates an affordable housing fast track, 3 streamlines building for “modest” development projects, and Proposal 4 creates a board of the mayor, borough president, and Council speaker that can override the Council when it blocks or reduces affordable housing in development projects.

While the changes passed by finer margins than initial polling suggested, supporters touted the vote as a victory for affordable housing in an election that had the highest turnout in a mayoral year since 1969.

“There is a healthy pro-housing consensus in this city. Over a million people voted for an affordable housing fast track, and in every borough and in places where the political system has not been delivering affordable housing in a generation,” said Alec Shirrenbeck, executive director of the Charter Revision Commission, which was convened by Mayor Eric Adams and crafted the measures.

According to the New York Housing Conference, just 10 City Council districts built 53 percent of all the city’s affordable housing over the past decade. Four out of 51 districts produced under 100 total units, according to their tracker.

While changing the power dynamics around housing appealed to YIMBYs and their coalition, the City Council and some tenants’ rights groups saw the ballot measures as a power grab.

“The deceptive language of Mayor Adams’ proposals hid what they changed in order to secure approval from voters, which is fundamentally anti-democratic,” said City Council Spokesperson Benjamin Fang in a statement to City Limits.

The ballot measures passed by wide margins in some City Council districts where members were strongly opposed, like Council Speaker Adrienne Adams’ district, where nearly three in four voters on average voted for ballot measures 2 through 4.

The City Council maintains that the proposals were worded deceptively. “Portraying them simply as advancing housing faster rather than honestly as shifting power from a democratic land use process to more mayoral power, helps explain why they were approved and where they earned support,” Spokesperson Fang said in a statement.

The proposals underperformed compared to other recent ballot measures, passing with the narrowest margin in 15 years, according to the Council’s analysis. No measure passed with less than two thirds of the vote in that time, the Council says.

City lawmakers are now pushing for Gov. Kathy Hochul’s signature on a bill in Albany that would roll back some of the changes passed by New York voters (though Hochul expressed support for the ballot measures before Election Day).

Opponents say they support new housing, but that the measures cut local voices from the process and reduce the leverage that councilmembers have to secure benefits in their districts during project negotiations.

New tools for a new mayor

Amid rising housing costs across the country, cities have been looking for ways to build more, which some experts say will ease rent increases. But local communities often oppose new development—creating a political conundrum for policymakers.

Opposition to projects like the Just Home affordable housing complex in the Bronx, where the local community and councilmembers protested, can stop or slow new construction for years.

“The loudest community voices are a small minority of any area. And those voices get amplified in certain public meetings and certain press, but they do not represent the majority of residents in any neighborhood,” said Andrew Fine, policy director at the YIMBY group Open New York.

But in a sign of changing political dynamics around housing, Republican Councilmember Kristy Marmorato, who won her seat in 2023 in part due to her opposition to Just Home, lost to Democrat Shirley Aldebol earlier this month. The district was also the only Republican-represented district to vote for the ballot measures, which won 52 percent of the vote there.

Signs opposing the Just Home project in The Bronx neighborhood where it was planned. (Adi Talwar/City Limits)

In New Jersey, the state’s northern suburbs have built 50 percent more homes per resident than New York City, thanks to a landmark legal decision called Mount Laurel, which requires localities to zone to facilitate housing.

Now, with a fast track to production in the 12 community districts that have built the least affordable housing, New York City will have its own mechanism to build in neighborhoods that are lagging behind.

“This happens all the time, where a larger form of government makes decisions that are best for the greater good, and that can understand the externalities that a smaller form of government cannot,” said Fine.

He also pointed to recent tenant protections, including 2019 state rent laws and good cause eviction, that he says open the door to new housing while assuaging fears about displacement.

Mayor-elect Zohran Mamdani voted for the housing ballot measures on Election Day, after weeks of speculation over his stance.

“I also understand that there are councilmembers in opposition to these measures, and their opposition is driven by commitment to their communities and a deep concern about investment in those communities and I share the commitment to that investment,” Mamdani said after voting. “I look forward to working with them and delivering.”

Supporters said that the changes to the land use process are modest fixes—and the government will still be in conversation with local districts about their needs when it comes to new development. 

“You need to do deep community work, that you need to work with all the elected officials. You have to try to find consensus wherever consensus can be found. Nothing about these changes suspends the rules of politics,” said Shierenbeck.

The ballot measures will give Mamdani more tools to reach his ambitious housing goals, which includes building 200,000 affordable apartments in the next decade, Shierenbeck added.

He pointed to the “fast track” provision, which means publicly financed affordable housing projects—like the long-debated Elizabeth Street Garden senior building in SoHo—will be voted on by the Board of Standards going forward instead of the City Council, where opposition from local councilmembers can sometimes derail projects.

In development, time is money. Shierenbeck thinks the new zoning actions will help Mamdani stretch the city’s capital dollars to finance affordable housing, even as he tries to ask the state for more.

“These reforms are not everything, but coupled with other changes and a kind of a multi-year commitment to housing, that we can really see material benefits for working in middle class New Yorkers,” said Shierenbeck.

To reach the reporter behind this story, contact Patrick@citylimits.org. To reach the editor, contact Jeanmarie@citylimits.org

Want to republish this story? Find City Limits’ reprint policy here.

The post How Your NYC Neighborhood Voted On The Housing Ballot Measures appeared first on City Limits.

Trump’s comments about Fuentes and Carlson could prolong a Republican rift over antisemitism

posted in: All news | 0

By CHRIS MEGERIAN and THOMAS BEAUMONT, Associated Press

WASHINGTON (AP) — When President Donald Trump doesn’t like someone, he knows how to show it. In just the last few days, he’s described Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene as a traitor, mocked Rep. Thomas Massie’s second marriage after his first wife died and demanded that comedian Seth Meyers get fired from his late-night television show.

But he had nothing bad to say about two people roiling his party: white nationalist Nick Fuentes and conservative commentator Tucker Carlson. The former Fox News host recently hosted Fuentes for a friendly interview, where he declined to challenge his guest’s bigoted beliefs or a remark about problems with “organized Jewry in America.”

FILE – Nick Fuentes, far right activist, holds a rally at the Lansing Capitol, in Lansing, Mich., Wednesday, Nov. 11, 2020. (Nicole Hester/Mlive.com/Ann Arbor News via AP, File)

Asked about the controversy that has been rippling through Republican circles for weeks, Trump did not criticize Fuentes and praised Carlson for having “said good things about me over the years.”

The president’s answer echoes his longstanding reluctance to disavow — and sometimes, his willingness to embrace — right-wing figures who have inched their way from the political fringe to the Republican mainstream.

“We are disappointed in President Trump,” said Morton Klein, president of the conservative Zionist Organization of America, adding that he should “rethink and retract” his comments.

The threat of antisemitism, which has percolated across the political spectrum, will likely be a recurring political issue in the coming year, as Democrats and Republicans battle for control of Congress in the midterms. Although Trump has targeted left-wing campus activism as a hive of anti-Jewish sentiment, Fuentes’ influence is a test of whether conservatives are willing to accommodate bigots as part of their political coalition.

A top conservative group faces antisemitism controversy

The turmoil has already engulfed the Heritage Foundation, a leading think tank whose president Kevin Roberts initially refused to distance himself from Carlson. A member of Heritage’s board of trustees, Robert George, announced his resignation Monday, which followed a recent decision by an antisemitism task force to sever its ties with the organization.

Although Roberts has apologized, George said “we reached an impasse” because he didn’t fully retract his original support for Carlson.

FILE – Tucker Carlson, left, talks after President Donald Trump posthumously awarded the Presidential Medal of Freedom to Charlie Kirk in the Rose Garden of the White House, Oct. 14, 2025, in Washington. (AP Photo/Alex Brandon, File)

“I pray that Heritage’s research and advocacy will be guided by the conviction that each and every member of the human family, irrespective of race, ethnicity, religion, or anything else, as a creature fashioned in the very image of God, is ‘created equal’ and ‘endowed by our Creator with certain unalienable rights,’” George wrote on Facebook, quoting the Declaration of Independence.

Laurie Cardoza-Moore, an evangelical conservative activist and film producer, joined Heritage’s antisemitism task force in June but stepped away when Roberts refused to resign.

“If we aren’t solid on condemning antisemitism, shame on us,” she said Monday.

Cardoza-Moore praised Trump’s record on supporting Israel but said he fell short on Sunday while talking about Carlson and Fuentes.

“We can all agree — and I wish — that he would have gone further,” she said.

It’s unclear what kind of pressure Trump will face despite his previous dalliance with Fuentes, who had dinner with the past-and-future president at his Mar-a-Lago club in between his two terms.

“I don’t think President Trump during his first or second term could be acting more strongly to prevent antisemitism,” said Matthew Brooks, executive director of the Republican Jewish Coalition. He noted Trump’s first-term relocation of the U.S. embassy in Israel to Jerusalem and, more recently, the president’s handling of the war in Gaza.

Trump’s comments could prolong a Republican rift

This is not the first time Trump has shied away from criticizing fringe elements on the right. During his first campaign for president, Trump initially declined to disavow support from white nationalist David Duke, saying, “I just don’t know anything about him.”

Related Articles


Group of South Carolina lawmakers look at the most restrictive abortion bill in the US


US has warned others to avoid loans from Chinese state banks. But it’s the biggest recipient of all


After years away from Washington, Saudi crown prince to get warm embrace from Trump, US business


House expected to vote on bill forcing release of Jeffrey Epstein files


Trump administration sues California over law banning masked federal agents

He claimed there were “very fine people on both sides” during racist violence in Charlottesville, Virginia. While running for reelection, he told the extremist Proud Boys to “stand back and stand by.”

Trump’s unwillingness to condemn either Fuentes or Carlson has the potential to prolong a rift within the Republican Party. On Sunday, as he prepared to fly back to Washington from a weekend in Florida, Trump praised Carlson and said “you can’t tell him who to interview.”

“If he wants to interview Nick Fuentes — I don’t know much about him — but if he wants to do it, get the word out,” Trump said. “People have to decide.”

Fuentes liked what he heard, posting “Thank you Mr. President!” on social media.

Trump’s remarks run counter to a wave of objections that have flowed from key Republicans. The issue will be the focus of a planned gathering of pro-Israel conservative leaders on Tuesday in Washington called “Exposing and Countering Extremism and Antisemitism on the Political Right.”

The event features U.S. Ambassador to Israel Mike Huckabee, Tony Perkins of the Family Research Council, Ralph Reed of the Faith and Freedom Coalition, and Klein, of the Zionist Organization of America.

Perkins said the event has been discussed for some time. “But with recent comments by folks like Tucker, there was an urgency to go ahead and hold the conference,” he said.

The recent annual summit of the Republican Jewish Coalition in Las Vegas was similarly focused on condemning antisemitism within the party, a shift from the original plans to celebrate the ceasefire in Gaza and the return of Hamas-held hostages.

Brooks said at the time, “We are at this point in what I consider sort of the early stages of an undeclared civil war within the Republican Party, as it relates to Israel, and antisemitism and the Jewish community.”

“And it’s really going to be our challenge going forward to combat that before it has a chance to grow and metastasize in the Republican Party,” Brooks said.

During one part of the conference, college students waved red signs that read, “Tucker is not MAGA.”

Trump addressed the summit by prerecorded video, using his time to promote his administration’s support for Israel. He did not mention the controversy that had dominated the conference.

Beaumont reported from Des Moines, Iowa. Adriana Gomez Licon in Fort Lauderdale, Fla. contributed to this report.

National Geographic’s 25 best destinations to visit in 2026

posted in: All news | 0

Every year, the entire staff of National Geographic — writers, explorers, photographers — get together to decide the best places to visit in the year to come.

Related Articles


Going to Lambeau for the Vikings game? Here are my favorite spots to eat in Green Bay


Feeling right at home in Scotland


One Tech Tip: iPhone users can now add US passport info to their digital wallets


Joshua Tree short-term rental frenzy cools, but community is changed forever


Airlines are optimistic about a quick recovery ahead of Thanksgiving once FAA ends flight cuts

It’s like the world’s most qualified travel company is giving you advice for free. Getting there, now that will cost you – although for 2026’s picks, some destinations for U.S. residents are easier to reach than you might think.

“Our annual Best of the World feature will inspire you to explore Spain’s Basque Country beyond a total solar eclipse, hike a coast-to-coast trail in South Korea, plan a road trip on America’s iconic Route 66, or celebrate 800 years of maritime history in England,” write the magazine’s staff.

Domestically, places that made the list include Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania (impressive arts and culture); Maui, Hawaii (recovering after the 2023 wildfires) and the Badlands of North Dakota (the soon-to-open Theodore Roosevelt Presidential Library). In no particular order, here are some other destinations on the magazine’s list of 25.

National Geographic’s best places in the world to travel to in 2026

1 The Dolomites, Milan, Italy

2 Vancouver, Canada

3 Beijing, China

4 Rabat, Morocco

5 Hull, Yorkshire, England

The city of Tulsa, Okla., has preserved its historic Meadow Gold neon sign to shine bright over Route 66 (now 11th Street). (Photo by Scott Varley, Daily Breeze/SCNG)

6 Manila, Philippines

7 Akagera National Park, Rwanda

8 Oulu, Finland

9 Route 66, Oklahoma

10 Coastal Oaxaca, Mexico

Source: nationalgeographic.com/travel/article/best-of-the-world-2026