Son of a Gun: What to Do with a Legacy of (Unwanted) Firearms

posted in: All news | 0

Americans own nearly 400 million guns. Five of them were recently lying on my parents’ living room floor in Dallas. Two revolvers looked like props from a ’70s cop movie. A pistol with a perforated barrel looked like it was from a space opera. There was a Field & Stream-worthy shotgun and a semi-automatic rifle right out of a mass shooting.

This collection of firearms will likely be my responsibility when my father is gone. I might not like it, but I may not have a choice. Last September, he drafted a gun trust and named me as trustee. When I told him I wasn’t particularly interested in taking responsibility for some of these weapons, he paused and thought for a minute.

“There’s no reason not to keep all of them,” he said.

There isn’t?

Everyone I know has a relationship with guns. They’re ingrained in American culture—our movies, books, and politics. The Bill of Rights devoted 27 words to the right to bear firearms but not one to the right to vote. Guns have put food on American tables and defended families. I’ve enjoyed shooting clays with a friend. Over the last few decades, however, the moral weight and awful responsibility of these weapons has grown heavier.

When I was in seventh grade, a classmate of mine took his life with a shotgun. Weeks before I graduated high school, two young men rampaged through Columbine High School, killing 13 people. These tragedies haven’t stopped. Suicide rates of American kids between the ages of 10 and 14 have soared 80 percent since 2001.Half of the time, it’s with a gun. The frequency of school shootings has quadrupled since the 1970s.

I’ve lived a little over four decades now. In that time, there’s been a dramatic decrease in murder and crime overall. Yet the nature of deadly gun violence has grown increasingly heinous. 

Baby Boomers, though, are a different generation. They own more guns per person than any other demographic group. As many begin to think about their legacies, their guns will have to go somewhere. My 74-year-old father’s plans suddenly include me, but I’m not alone. Survey estimates suggest that more than a quarter of gun owners have acquired arms not by purchase but as gifts or inheritances.

AS THE TRUSTEE OF FIVE GUNS AND A SILENCER, I WILL GET TO DECIDE THEIR FATE UPON MY DAD’S DEATH.

In December, I attended the Original Fort Worth Gun Show, which bills itself as the largest in Texas, to hear from collectors about their own plans. Between tables of muskets, Safari-sized ammo and AR-15s, some told me of family members ecstatic about inheriting their collections. Others would sigh, glance at the ground, and confess the interest in their collection ended with them. 

One had a solid plan. Ron, who gave only his first name, pawed a tin of Copenhagen as he told me about his advanced heart disease. After he dies, he said, he has arranged for his collection to go straight to auction. His daughter won’t have to deal with it.

Back in my parents’ home, I know these guns won’t just be carted off or disappear. They’re real wood and metal. Heavy, smooth, and cold. The shotgun’s silver receiver gleams in the living room light. Unlike an old couch that can be tossed to the curb, these items can be lethal if mishandled.

Glaring at the Smith & Wesson M&P 15—one of the most popular semi-auto rifles—I don’t know how to do even the simplest things, like verify it’s unloaded or check the safety. Couple that with a danger affecting similar models where it’s possible to experience “multiple discharges without [pulling] the trigger.” If I were to handle this weapon, it’s possible nothing would happen. Or, I could become one of the 27,000 Americans accidentally injured by a firearm each year.

The M&P 15 also happens to be the same model used in mass shootings in Aurora, Colorado; Highland Park, Illinois; and Parkland, Florida. 

Some legacy.

The odd thing is, aside from the shotgun passed down from my great-grandfather, these guns don’t have sentimental value to me. My father and I never went shooting or hunting together. Although I knew there was a revolver somewhere in our family’s home, he never showed it to me or taught me how to shoot it. Instead, we spent hours casting fly lines in the middle of rippling trout streams, which is about as far from semi-automatic as you can get.

Rather, his collection was amassed largely in the last decade and propelled by a distrust in government. He has plenty of company. The sharpest spikes in gun purchases have occurred after mass shootings and precisely when talk of new gun laws grows the loudest. Yet it wasn’t gun regulation that soared after these tragedies, but thoughts, prayers, and profits for companies like Smith & Wesson.

My father’s political statement comes with a gun trust, a legal tool that has gained popularity among some gun owners in the last several years—and something I knew nothing about.

“A trust is created whenever it’s in writing and it has something of value,” attorney Robert Ray told me. The “something of value” could be anything from real estate to a gun collection. The trust becomes the owner of the assets. Trustees, like me, manage those assets.

As the trustee of five guns and a silencer, I will get to decide their fate upon my dad’s death. I started looking at my options.

It wasn’t long before I found Gatling Gun Rescue out of Dallas, which advertises its free gun removal service on its website: “Have Gun? We travel.” Graham, who asked I only use his first name, is a licensed private detective and firearms professional who runs the operation. He collects unwanted guns and provides a receipt of transfer, no questions asked. Widows and avid shooters short on space make up many of his online queries. 

During the COVID-19 pandemic, Graham told me, “Some people thought any stranger with a 104-degree fever was going to break down their front door.” When such apocalyptic visions proved more cough than bite, a late 2020 spike in gun purchases led to buyers’ remorse. He gets those inquiries as well.

Graham said he makes no money from the operation. Instead, the roughly 40 unwanted firearms he re-homes each year have ended up with groups like the Boy Scouts and in at least one museum.

Local police are another option. Not every department will accept firearms, though many do—including the Dallas and Plano police in my area. But what happens to them afterward can be opaque at best. A 2024 CBS investigation found several North Texas police agencies had sent 2,600 surrendered firearms to a contractor for what they thought was destruction. Instead, only some of the guns were destroyed while others were salvaged for parts and resold as repair kits.

Auction? I doubt the collection would garner much interest. Resell? The thought of walking into a gun store with a case of weapons to sell makes me feel uneasy. 

As a gun-loving generation passes, we’re facing a wave of unwanted weapons. For some, there are just too many to house. For others, there’s simply no interest. As one collector told me at the gun show, “None of us has an expiration date on his wrist.” But, rest assured, hard decisions are coming.

“When you get older,” my father observed after I had first voiced my concerns about inheriting his gun collection in January, “you realize you spend your life acquiring things that most people don’t want.” Such an admission was as cathartic to me as it was haunting. What was I collecting that my daughter might be left to deal with years from now?

The post Son of a Gun: What to Do with a Legacy of (Unwanted) Firearms appeared first on The Texas Observer.

Global tributes pour in to honor Pope Francis after his death

posted in: All news | 0

LYON, France — Church bells tolled in mourning. Well-wishers flocked into pews. Tributes to Pope Francis poured in from around the world on Monday after the Vatican announced the pontiff’s death at age 88.

The 266th pope was praised for his groundbreaking steps to honor the poor and the vulnerable; seek to end conflicts like those in the Middle East, Ukraine and Africa; protect the environment; and guide the Catholic Church toward greater tolerance of gays and lesbians, among other things. Some critics say he didn’t always go far enough. Others said he went too far.

Many recalled his legacy as the first pope from Latin America, and the first Jesuit to reach the pinnacle of church hierarchy, one who stressed humility over hubris for a Church beset with scandal and indifference.

Here’s a look at some of the global reactions a day after his last public appearance on Easter Sunday to bless thousands of people in St. Peter’s Square.

U.S. Vice President JD Vance, who met with the pope on Easter Sunday before traveling to India, wrote on social media that his “heart goes out” to the millions of Christians who loved him, and said: “I was happy to see him yesterday, though he was obviously very ill.”

King Charles III praised the pope for his work on safeguarding the planet, and alluded to their multiple personal meetings — including a private visit on April 10 at the Vatican. “We were greatly moved to have been able to visit him earlier in the month,’’ the King wrote in a statement signed “Charles R.” It was the pope’s first known meeting with a foreign dignitary after he was hospitalized for five weeks with double-pneumonia.

— Church bells tolled in honor of Francis, from the recently reopened Notre Dame Cathedral in Paris to a lone bell at the St. Bartholomew Parish in Bulacan, in the Philippines, that was rung 88 times to signify “the 88 fruitful years of our dear Pope Francis,” the parish wrote on social media.

Martin Pendergast, secretary of the LGBT Catholics Westminster in London, recalled how Francis looked past sexual orientation and said he wouldn’t judge people who tried to carry out the will of God. “He was the first pope to actually use the word ‘gay,’ so even the way he speaks has been a radical transformation — and some would say a bit of a revolution as well — compared with some of his predecessors,” Pendergast said.

The Women’s Ordination Conference lamented Francis’ unwillingness to push for the ordination of women. “His repeated ‘closed door’ policy on women’s ordination was painfully incongruous with his otherwise pastoral nature, and for many, a betrayal of the synodal, listening church he championed,” the conference said. “This made him a complicated, frustrating and sometimes heart-breaking figure for many women.”

President Emmanuel Macron of France, a largely Roman Catholic country, focused on the pope’s impact on the church, writing on social media that “from Buenos Aires to Rome, Pope Francis wanted the Church to bring joy and hope to the poorest. For it to unite humans among themselves, and with nature. May this hope forever outlast him.”

Italian Premier Giorgia Meloni, one of the few official visitors to see Francis during his recent hospitalization, alluded to the pope’s personal comfort and advice, saying it “never failed me, not even in times of trial and suffering.” She added: “We are saying goodbye to a great man and a great shepherd.”

Taiwan’s President Lai Ching-te expressed condolences on social media and said people there would “continue to draw inspiration from his lifelong commitment to peace, global solidarity, and caring for those in need.” The Holy See is among Taiwan’s only 12 remaining diplomatic allies while China, which claims self-ruled Taiwan as its own territory, has been poaching others.

South African President Cyril Ramaphosa noted the pope’s “extraordinary life story” and said “Pope Francis advanced a world view of inclusion, equality and care for marginalized individuals and groups, as well as responsible and sustainable custody of the natural environment.” Africa has seen some of the Catholic Church’s biggest growth in recent years.

European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen recalled the pontiff as an inspiration for the entire world, not just Christians. “He inspired millions, far beyond the Catholic Church, with his humility and love so pure for the less fortunate,” she said on social media. “My thoughts are with all who feel this profound loss.”

Israeli President Issac Herzog, whose role is mostly ceremonial, called Francis a man of “deep faith and boundless compassion.” Francis repeatedly criticized Israel’s wartime conduct in Gaza and said allegations of genocide, which Israel has adamantly denied, should be investigated. “I truly hope that his prayers for peace in the Middle East and for the safe return of the hostages will soon be answered,” Herzog said on social media.

The Palestine Red Crescent offered condolences to Christians, calling the pope “one of the most prominent supporters of justice and human dignity, including his noble stances regarding the suffering of the Palestinian people and their right to freedom and justice.”

President Abdel Fattah el-Sissi of Egypt, an overwhelmingly Muslim country, said Francis leaves behind “a great human legacy that will remain etched in the conscience of humanity.”

President Alexander Van der Bellen of Austria recalled how the pope traveled to the Italian island of Lampedusa, a key landing point for migrants seeking to reach Europe, to meet with refugees and commemorate those who died while trying to cross the Mediterranean. The Austrian leader said on social media that the pope’s impact resonated in ways large and small: “He ensured that homeless people near St. Peter’s Square could shower. He criticized dehumanizing words and gestures. That was Pope Francis.”

President Vladimir Putin of Russia hailed the pope as a “consistent defender of the high values of humanism and justice” and alluded to the pontiff’s efforts to foster interfaith dialogue between the Russian Orthodox and the Roman Catholic Churches. Last year, the pope suggested Ukraine should have the courage to negotiate an end to the war with Russia and not be ashamed to sit at the same table to carry out talks. Critics said that suggested he was siding with Russia. Francis tried to maintain the Vatican’s traditional diplomatic neutrality during the war, but that often was accompanied by apparent sympathy with Russia’s rationale for invading Ukraine — like when he said NATO was “barking at Russia’s door” with its eastward expansion.

AP journalists from around the world contributed to this report.

Related Articles


What are the church’s rites after the death of a pope and the election of a new one?


Pope Francis dies at 88


A Scandia pastor overcame addiction. Now he confronts the stigma in a podcast aimed at faith communities.


After fire at St. Paul church, owner wants to secure steeple, return to ministering


Is he Christ? Is he Moses? Superman’s religious and ethical undertones add to his mystique

Instagram tries using AI to determine if teens are pretending to be adults

posted in: All news | 0

By BARBARA ORTUTAY, Associated Press Technology Writer

Instagram is beginning to test the use of artificial intelligence to determine if kids are lying about their ages on the app, parent company Meta Platforms said on Monday.

Meta has been using AI to determine people’s ages for some time, the company said, but photo and video-sharing app will now “proactively” look for teen accounts it suspects belong to teenagers even if they entered an inaccurate birthdate when they signed up.

If it is determined that a user is misrepresenting their age, the account will automatically become a teen account, which has more restrictions than an adult account. Teen accounts are private by default. Private messages are restricted so teens can only receive them from people they follow or are already connected to. “Sensitive content,” such as videos of people fighting or those promoting cosmetic procedures, will be limited, Meta said. Teens will also get notifications if they are on Instagram for more than 60 minutes and a “sleep mode” will be enabled that turns off notifications and sends auto-replies to direct messages from 10 p.m. until 7 a.m.

Meta says it trains its AI to look for signals, such as the type of content the account interacts, profile information and when the account was created, to determine the owner’s age.

The heightened measures arrive as social media companies face increased scrutiny over how their platform affects the mental health and well-being of younger users. A growing number of states are also trying to pass age verification laws, although they have faced court challenges.

Meta and other social media companies support putting the onus on app stores to verify ages amid criticism that they don’t do enough to make their products safe for children — or verify that no kids under 13 use them.

Instagram will also send notifications to parents “with information about how they can have conversations with their teens on the importance of providing the correct age online,” the company said.

More Democratic lawmakers are visiting El Salvador on Abrego Garcia’s behalf

posted in: All news | 0

By MATT BROWN, Associated Press

WASHINGTON (AP) — Four House Democratic lawmakers have traveled to El Salvador to call attention to the plight of a man the Trump administration deported to a Salvadoran prison and has refused to help return — even after the Supreme Court ruled that it was the government’s duty to do so.

Reps. Yassamin Ansari of Arizona, Maxine Dexter of Oregon, Maxwell Frost of Florida and Robert Garcia of California arrived in the Central American nation on Sunday to investigate the condition of Kilmar Abrego Garcia, who had lived in the United States for more than a decade. The Trump administration deported him, a move that administration officials have said in court filings was erroneous.

But despite a Supreme Court ordering the Trump administration to help facilitate Abrego Garcia’s return, the administration has said it has no power to bring him back, a choice being scrutinized by federal courts as potentially in violation of judicial rulings.

“To see the Trump administration so blatantly and egregiously defy the Supreme Court and have no regard for due process is extremely alarming to me,” Ansari said in an interview. “Even with all of the illegal actions we’ve seen over the last couple of months, I think this is the one that terrifies me the most when it comes to the future of our democracy.”

The trip comes after one last week

The quartet’s trip comes after Sen. Chris Van Hollen of Maryland traveled to El Salvador last week and met Abrego Garcia and Salvadoran officials. Abrego Garcia had lived in Maryland with his wife and three children, who are American citizens, before he was deported on March 15.

Sen. Chris Van Hollen, D-Md., is welcomed by supporters upon his arrival from meeting with Kilmar Abrego Garcia in El Salvador, at Washington Dulles International Airport, in Chantilly, Va., Friday, April 18, 2025. (AP Photo/Jose Luis Magana)

Abrego Garcia’s protected legal status prohibited him from being deported to El Salvador. He was deported on one of three planes filled with alleged migrant gang members.

Garcia said he and Frost sent a letter last week to House Oversight Committee Chair James Comer, R-Ky., requesting that an official delegation go to El Salvador to investigate Abrego Garcia’s condition and push for his return, but received no response. Ansari said more Democrats would be traveling to El Salvador in the coming days and weeks.

“Those of us in the House who are here greatly admire and support what Sen. Van Hollen did,” Garcia said. Of Abrego Garcia, he said, “His family knew that he was safe, but he’s not home, and so we’ve got to continue the pressure, and we’ve got to ensure that the rule of law in the United States is allowed.”

Justice Department lawyers said in court last week that they have no power to advance Abrego Garcia’s return because he is in a foreign country’s custody. Administration officials also claimed in public comments that Abrego Garcia was engaged in human trafficking and terrorism and therefore correctly deported. White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said that if Abrego Garcia were to return to the U.S., “he would immediately be deported again.”

Van Hollen unsuccessfully lobbied the Salvadoran government for Abrego Garcia’s return. He told NBC’s “Meet the Press” on Sunday that the United States is facing a “constitutional crisis” if the Trump administration does not follow the Supreme Court’s order to push to bring Abrego Garcia back.

It’s a warning Democrats are increasingly amplifying. Rather than debate President Donald Trump’s hardline immigration policy or the merits of the administration’s invocation of national security to carry out deportations, Democratic lawmakers are zeroing in on the issue of due process, with some noting that the Supreme Court and lower court federal judges found Abrego Garcia was deported without a proper hearing.

“The government’s argument, moreover, implies that it could deport and incarcerate any person, including U. S. citizens, without legal consequence, so long as it does so before a court can intervene,” Justice Sonia Sotomayor wrote in the court’s ruling in Abrego Garcia’s case.

Said Garcia: “They’re trying to demonize him, and we’re not here to defend him. He deserves due process, and everyone deserves due process. … What he did or may have done, that has to be decided by a judge.”

Republicans have been going, too — for a different reason

Several House Republicans have visited El Salvador’s Terrorism Confinement Center, the prison where Abergo Garcia is being held, and lauded the facility for what they view as El Salvador’s tough-on-crime policies. Republican senators and governors have defended Abrego Garcia’s detention as part of a broader crackdown on illegal immigration. But at least one Republican senator called the administration’s deportation of Abrego Garcia a mistake.

Related Articles


The ‘return’ of an extinct wolf is not the answer to saving endangered species, experts warn


Andreas Kluth: The US has Greenland (and foreign policy) exactly upside down


Other voices: Judge Boasberg is right to seek contempt against Trump officials


David Brooks: Time for a civic uprising


EEOC instructs staff to sideline all new transgender discrimination cases, employees say

“The administration won’t admit it. But this was a screw-up,” said Sen. John Kennedy, a Louisiana Republican, on NBC’s “Meet the Press.”

During a meeting with Salvadoran President Nayib Bukele in the Oval Office, Trump remarked that “homegrown” lawbreakers should be deported to prisons in the Central American country and urged Bukele to “build about five more places” like the notorious penitentiary where Abrego Garcia is now held.

Congressional Republicans have so far shown little interest in negotiating the dispute between the president and the judiciary. Democrats, who are in the minority in both chambers of Congress, have little leverage to pressure the White House. But Abrego Garcia’s case has become both an alarming and galvanizing case inside the party.

Democrats “have the power to draw attention to this issue, to keep the pressure up,” Ansari said. “That’s why you know some of us are going, and so many members will be going. Because this is about the future of our democracy and the future of due process as American citizens.”