Forest Lake newspaper will now be based in Stillwater

posted in: All news | 0

The Forest Lake Times is moving to Stillwater.

The weekly newspaper, published by Adams Publishing Group, has decided to consolidate the Forest Lake office with the office of the Stillwater Gazette, also published by Adams.

“This move is an effort to save costs by merging two offices located so closely together in Washington County,” according to an article published in the Gazette.

There has been a newsroom in Forest Lake since 1903, when the city’s first newspaper, The Enterprise, began publication, said Cliff Buchan, former editor of The Times. It was changed in 1907 to The Forest Lake Advertiser and became The Forest Lake Times in 1916, he said.

Forest Lake Mayor Blake Roberts called the decision to close the Forest Lake office “extremely disappointing.”

“The Times has been an institution in Forest Lake for well over 100 years,” he said. “I realize that small local newspapers are really struggling, so I understand why this decision was made. My hope is that this move will allow the parent company of the Times to report on Forest Lake news and events well into the future.”

A spokesman for Adams Publishing Group did not immediately return a phone call seeking comment.

Related Articles


Woodbury duplex destroyed in fire


A Scandia pastor overcame addiction. Now he confronts the stigma in a podcast aimed at faith communities.


World Tai Chi Day event returns to Stillwater on April 26


‘Know every move you’re making’: Stillwater prison inmates learn life lessons playing chess


William O’Brien State Park to unveil $5M in accessibility improvements

Moises Mendoza to Be Third Person Killed by State of Texas This Year

posted in: All news | 0

Come Wednesday, Moises Mendoza is scheduled to be the third person executed by the State of Texas this year. The 41-year-old has spent half of his life on death row. 

In 2005, Mendoza was convicted of the murder, kidnapping, and aggravated sexual assault of 20-year-old Rachelle Tolleson and sentenced to die by a Collin County jury. He’s one of 16 people the North Texas county has sent to death row since the 1970s. Prosecutors sought an execution date last year, and a judge signed the order in November. 

Tolleson and Mendoza had been classmates at Farmersville High School, and, in early 2004, Mendoza attended a party at Tolleson’s home, where she lived with her five-month-old daughter. Less than a week later, on March 18, 2004, Tolleson’s mother discovered her daughter’s house ransacked and the baby alone on the bed. Mendoza was arrested on March 24 after a friend told police he’d admitted to killing Tolleson. 

In his eventual confession, Mendoza told police that Tolleson agreed to leave with him and had sex with him willingly, then he choked her to death and stabbed her in the throat. But authorities didn’t buy that Tolleson left of her own volition, nor that the sex was consensual, newspaper reports show. Authorities discovered that after being questioned as a suspect, Mendoza moved Tolleson’s body to a creek bed three miles from Farmersville, then burned her remains. A man reportedly searching for arrowheads in the creek discovered the body six days after the murder.

“No matter what they read, people think I’m an animal. I’m a human being. People make mistakes. I’m not saying that justifies it,” Mendoza told the Dallas Morning News in 2005. “I know I took that little girl’s mother away … a mother, a daughter, cousin to others. I want to send them my apologies. I know it means nothing.”

Mendoza and his Atlanta attorney did not respond to requests, or declined comment, for this story. 

Public support for Mendoza has been thin prior to his April 23 execution date. Multiple online petitions call for the execution to be stopped but mostly cite general issues with the death penalty. 

“We oppose this execution as we do every execution,” reads a Catholic Mobilizing Network website urging people to write Governor Greg Abbott. “Capital punishment is an act of state sanctioned violence that violates the sacred dignity of every human life.”

Others recently scheduled to be executed in Texas have generated more public support. Two won at least temporary relief based on innocence claims. In October, Robert Roberson’s execution was stayed after a bipartisan group of lawmakers intervened at the eleventh hour, following weeks of high-profile outcry. David Wood, convicted of being an El Paso serial killer, was granted a stay of execution in March after a flurry of media reports and legal efforts.

Even Steven Nelson, the first man executed in Texas in 2025, had the full-throated support of his spiritual adviser and wife ahead of his date.

Mendoza’s attorneys have been quietly pushing appeals for twenty years, based on issues with his 2005 trial, including testimony presented at trial by one of the defense’s own expert witnesses, psychologist Mark Vigen, who called Mendoza’s lifestyle “depraved” and suggested he was a dangerous man.

In Texas, juries in capital cases are asked to determine whether to impose the death penalty based partly on whether the defendant is likely to pose a danger to others in the future. Mendoza’s defense attorneys argued that he would live peacefully in prison, but the state called a corrections officer who testified that Mendoza had attacked another man in the Collin County Jail while awaiting trial.

At the time, Mendoza’s trial attorneys didn’t attempt to rebut the officer’s testimony, according to appeals documents. Mendoza’s appeals lawyers later learned a contradictory story from Melvin Johnson, the prisoner Mendoza had been accused of fighting. Johnson later signed an affidavit saying he was the aggressor and Mendoza hadn’t fought back, but lawyers weren’t able to get any relief from the courts. 

Mendoza’s attorneys have continued his legal battle. Earlier this month, they filed a subsequent application for writ of habeas corpus in the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals (CCA) that largely focuses on the allegedly false testimony regarding Mendoza’s dangerousness. They also moved to stay the execution. The CCA denied both requests on April 15. 

His lawyers subsequently appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court, challenging the procedural reasons the CCA cited when refusing to consider Mendoza’s claims. The appeal asks the court to determine whether criminal defendants have the constitutional right to effective appellate attorneys, in addition to effective trial counsel. The state has argued that Mendoza’s arguments “seek a new constitutional rule of law.” 

The appeal also seeks a stay of execution, but the high court has yet to make any decision. The Texas Board of Pardons and Paroles denied Mendoza’s request for clemency April 21. 

The post Moises Mendoza to Be Third Person Killed by State of Texas This Year appeared first on The Texas Observer.

Judge extends ban on deportations from Colorado stemming from Trump’s use of 1798 law

posted in: All news | 0

By NICHOLAS RICCARDI

DENVER (AP) — A federal judge has extended her order temporarily preventing the Trump administration from moving or deporting anyone from Colorado under an 18th century wartime act that has become ensnared in a U.S. Supreme Court battle.

Related Articles


Divided Supreme Court finds some deadline flexibility for immigrants who agree to leave U.S.


For-profit immigration detention expands as Trump accelerates his deportation plans


Federal education cuts and Trump DEI demands leave states, teachers in limbo


US State Department unveils massive overhaul of agency with reduction of staff and bureaus


Federal court rulings have slowed down Trump deportation plans. What you need to know

District Court Judge Charlotte N. Sweeney cited the high court’s weekend order barring removal of anyone from North Texas, where the ACLU had contended the administration was preparing to deport Venezuelans under the Alien Enemies Act of 1798 without giving them the legal notice required under a prior supreme court ruling.

Sweeney continued her freeze on removals from Colorado until May 6 and indicated she may extend it further.

She required the federal government to provide 21 days’ notice to anyone it seeks to deport so they can contest their removal. She also expressed skepticism about the legality of Trump’s use of the law to claim the Venezuelan gang Tren de Aragua was invading the United States.

“At a bare minimum, ‘invasion’ means more than the Proclamation’s description of TdA’s ‘infiltrat(ion),’ ‘irregular warfare,’ and ‘hostile actions’ against the United States,” Sweeney wrote.

The Supreme Court earlier this month allowed deportations under the act but required the government to give those targeted a “reasonable” chance to contest the removals in court. The act has only been invoked three times in history, most recently in World War II, and the Supreme Court has yet to hear arguments about whether Trump can use it against a gang.

Several federal judges, including Sweeney, issued orders temporarily halting deportations in their areas in response to the initial high court ruling. The ACLU asked the Supreme Court to halt removals from an immigration detention center in North Texas, where a judge had not barred deportations, because it said Venezuelan migrants were given notice in English of their pending removal and not told they had the right to contest it in court. The court barred those removals in an unusual order early Saturday.

The federal government argued it was too soon for the courts to act because it wasn’t trying to remove the individual plaintiffs who filed the lawsuit at the time. But Timothy Macdonald, an ACLU attorney, contended that was a “shell game” that could lead the government to quickly deport someone the second a court decides it doesn’t have jurisdiction over their case.

Sweeney agreed, extending her order and scheduling arguments for whether she should make it permanent.

US State Department unveils massive overhaul of agency with reduction of staff and bureaus

posted in: All news | 0

By FARNOUSH AMIRI and MATTHEW LEE

Secretary of State Marco Rubio unveiled a massive overhaul of the State Department on Tuesday, with plans to reduce staff in the U.S. by 15% while closing and consolidating more than 100 bureaus worldwide as part of the Trump administration’s “America First” mandate.

Related Articles


What do ‘expert level’ talks signal for the progress of the Iran-US nuclear negotiations?


Hegseth pulled airstrike info from secure military channel for Signal posts, NBC News reports


Colorado fights Trump administration bid to help imprisoned loyalist Tina Peters


Vance calls for greater ties with India, hails progress on trade talks


As controversies pile up, Trump allies increasingly turn on one another

The reorganization plan, announced by Rubio on social media and detailed in documents obtained by The Associated Press, is the latest effort by the White House to reimagine U.S. foreign policy and scale back the size of the federal government.

“We cannot win the battle for the 21st century with bloated bureaucracy that stifles innovation and misallocates scarce resources,” Rubio said in a department-wide email obtained by The AP. “That is why, under the leadership of President Trump and at my direction, I am announcing a reorganization of the Department so it may meet the immense challenges of the 21st Century and put America First.”

Plans include consolidating 734 bureaus and offices to 602 as well as transitioning 137 offices “to another location within the Department to increase efficiency,” according to a fact sheet obtained by The AP.

There will also be a “reimagined” office focused on foreign and humanitarian affairs to coordinate the remaining foreign assistance programs left at State after the recent dismantling of the U.S. Agency for International Development.

Some of the bureaus that are expected to be cut include the Office of Global Women’s Issues and the department’s diversity and inclusion efforts, which have been cut government-wide since President Donald Trump took office in January. State is also expected to eliminate some offices previously under the Undersecretary of State for Civilian Security, Democracy, and Human Rights, but the fact sheet says that much of their work will continue in other sections of the department.

It is unclear if the reorganization would be implemented through an executive order or other means. Draft reorganization proposals shared within the department in recent weeks outlined an even more drastic shift of priorities than the one revealed Tuesday. The official plans came a week after The AP learned that the White House’s Office of Management and Budget proposed gutting the State Department’s budget by almost 50% and eliminating funding for the United Nations and NATO headquarters.

The budget proposal was still in a highly preliminary phase and not expected to pass muster with Congress.

Ahead of the changes at the State Department, the Trump administration has been slashing jobs and funding across agencies, from the Education Department to Health and Human Services.

On foreign policy, beyond the destruction of USAID, State has also moved to defund so-called other “soft power” institutions like media outlets delivering objective news, often to authoritarian countries, including the Voice of America, the Middle East Broadcasting Networks, Radio Free Asia and Radio/TV Marti, which broadcasts to Cuba.

Amiri reported from the United Nations.