Jace Frederick: Weekend in ‘Frisco will be stress test for Timberwolves’ improved defense

posted in: News | 0

Only one NBA team has held an opponent to 80 points or fewer in a game this season. It’s the Timberwolves, and they’ve now done in twice in consecutive outings.

Minnesota surrendered just 80 to the Clippers on Wednesday after holding the Lakers to 80 on Monday in Minneapolis. The Clippers also scored just 92 points against Minnesota last Friday. Three games, three stellar defensive performances.

Which, in the aftermath of an accountability session during and after a loss to the Kings on the eve of Thanksgiving, creates a narrative that the Timberwolves have turned the page and returned to their dominant defensive ways from a season ago.

Minnesota is now sixth in the NBA in defensive rating, surrendering just 108.6 points per 100 possessions, two tenths lower than the mark it sported a year ago to lead the League.

The Wolves are back, baby.

Well, maybe.

Context is important when evaluating any stretch of schedule, good or bad. So. it should be noted that Minnesota is holding down teams that were already lying on the mat.

The Lakers sport the third-worst offense in the NBA since Nov. 23, a seven-game stretch in which they’ve gone north of 105 points just twice. The Lakers have been held below 95 points in three of their past four outings, including another drubbing Wednesday in Miami.

After the loss to the Wolves, LeBron James aptly characterized his team’s offense as “nasty.”

The Clippers aren’t much better, specifically without Norman Powell. They rank 24th in offensive rating, scoring just 1.1 points per possession. But even that number swan dives when Powell — who’s averaging 24 points per game this season, while shooting 51 percent both from the field and from distance — isn’t on the floor. The Clippers’ offensive net rating improves by nine points when Powell is on the floor this season, per CleaningTheGlass.com.

That on/off split is in the 91st percentile league-wide.

Powell missed both games against Minnesota, and both the Lakers on Monday and the Clippers on Wednesday were playing the second of back-to-backs. So, the schedule certainly did Minnesota a solid at a time when the Wolves appeared to need it most.

But the Timberwolves did take advantage of the good fortune to the fullest extent. Eighty points is 80 points, no matter who you’re playing or the circumstances. It’s undeniable that Minnesota’s activity and attention to detail have both heightened in recent contests, and it’s worth noting that the Wolves’ defense was getting torched even by bad teams over the first dozen-plus games of the season.

The recent results signify progress; just how much progress is a question that will be determined over the weekend, when Minnesota plays a pair of games in San Francisco. The Warriors have lost five-straight games as of Thursday afternoon and, go figure, they play Houston on Thursday night ahead of their first bout with the Wolves on Friday.

The two teams will play again Sunday in the same location.

Golden State does sport the NBA’s ninth-best offense. Steph Curry and Draymond Green are missing Thursday’s game for injury management, and it appears as though Curry is a good bet to return against Minnesota, although Green’s situation is a bit murkier.

Regardless, the Warriors’ movement-based offense, centered on the shooting threat of Curry, will provide a stiff test for the communication and commitment that Minnesota struggled with to open the season. A defense is only as good as it is when pressed by offensive creativity and competency.

After a perfectly-timed, three-game stretch that allowed Minnesota to rebuild its image and identity on the defensive side of the ball, it’s time for a stress test.

Related Articles

Minnesota Timberwolves |


Timberwolves blow out Clippers in LA

Minnesota Timberwolves |


Timberwolves make a push to run in transition; early returns positive

Minnesota Timberwolves |


Timberwolves impressive in rout of Lakers

Minnesota Timberwolves |


Jace Frederick: Nickeil Alexander-Walker looks like a 30-plus minutes per game player. Will Timberwolves treat him as such?

Minnesota Timberwolves |


Jace Frederick: Anthony Edwards’ leadership had to take another step forward this week for Timberwolves

Fox News loses bid for Smartmatic voting-tech company’s records about Philippines bribery case

posted in: Politics | 0

By JENNIFER PELTZ

Smartmatic won’t be required to give Fox News a trove of information about U.S. federal charges against the voting machine company’s co-founder over alleged bribery in the Philippines, a judge ruled Thursday.

Fox News and parent Fox Corp. sought the information to help fight Smartmatic’s $2.7 billion defamation suit over broadcasts about the 2020 U.S. presidential election. Smartmatic says its business was gutted when Fox aired false claims that the election-tech company helped rig the voting.

Fox says it was simply reporting on newsworthy allegations made by then-President Donald Trump and his allies.

The Aug. 8 indictment of Smartmatic co-founder Roger Piñate and two other executives concerns a geographically distant matter: Smartmatic’s efforts to get work in the Philippines between 2015 and 2018.

But Fox maintains the criminal case is pertinent to Smartmatic’s business prospects, and therefore to the election-tech company’s claims about what it lost and stands to lose because of Fox’s 2020 coverage.

“As of Aug 8, governments will have to take into account the risks of doing business with a company (where some executives have been) accused of serious corruption by the U.S. Department of Justice,” Fox lawyer Brad Masters told a New York court Thursday.

He asked the court to order Smartmatic to provide any documents that it has given to the DOJ for the bribery investigation; any customer inquiries about the criminal charges; and any staff communications about the matter and its impact on the company.

The indictment accuses Piñate and two other Smartmatic executives of scheming to pay over $1 million in bribes to a Filipino election official to deploy the company’s machines and pay promptly for them. Federal prosecutors say the payments were made through sham loan agreements and via a slush fund created by overcharging for the machines.

Piñate, who has served as Smartmatic’s president, has pleaded not guilty to conspiring to violate the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act and to money laundering. It’s unclear from court records whether the other two executives have entered pleas.

Boca Raton, Florida-based Smartmatic itself isn’t charged in the criminal case. The company put the executives on leave and sought to reassure voters that elections are “conducted with the utmost integrity and transparency.”

Related Articles

National Politics |


Elon Musk and Vivek Ramaswamy are bringing Trump’s DOGE to Capitol Hill

National Politics |


Powell: Fed’s independence from politics is vital to its interest rate decisions

National Politics |


Billionaire who performed the first private spacewalk is Trump’s pick to lead NASA

National Politics |


States poised to end coverage for millions if Trump cuts Medicaid funding

National Politics |


Trump nominates cryptocurrency advocate Paul Atkins as SEC chair

Smartmatic’s lawyers contend the indictment is irrelevant to the defamation suit, which is about election-fraud allegations made by Trump’s attorneys.

“There’s merely an allegation, which is probative of nothing,” Smartmatic attorney Caitlin Kovacs argued Thursday. She suggested Fox wanted to “stand up here and play prosecutor to the jury” and “accuse Smartmatic of a crime that they didn’t commit.”

Judge David B. Cohen denied two similar requests from Fox while the federal investigation was ongoing, and said Thursday that the indictment didn’t change his mind.

“It’s a mere accusation. It raises no presumption of guilt,” he said.

Smartmatic is suing Fox and multiple current or former on-air hosts over shows in which Trump lawyers Rudy Giuliani and Sidney Powell portrayed the company as part of a broad conspiracy to steal the 2020 vote from Trump, a Republican and the winner of this year’s election.

Federal and state election officials, exhaustive reviews in battleground states and Trump’s own then-attorney general found no widespread fraud that could have changed the outcome of the 2020 election. Nor did they uncover any credible evidence that the vote was tainted. Dozens of courts, including some presided over by judges whom Trump appointed, rejected his fraud claims.

Fox News ultimately aired an interview with an election technology expert who refuted the allegations against Smartmatic.

Fox is countersuing Smartmatic, claiming the defamation case violates a New York law against baseless suits aimed at squelching reporting or criticism on public issues.

Smartmatic recently settled defamation suits against One America News Network and Newsmax. Fox News settled for $787 million last year with another voting-technology company, Dominion Voting Systems.

Memphis’ mayor pushes back against feds’ calls for major reforms of city’s police force

posted in: Politics | 0

By ADRIAN SAINZ and JONATHAN MATTISE

MEMPHIS, Tenn. (AP) — Memphis’ mayor pushed back Thursday against the need for a Justice Department deal to enact reforms in light of the scathing findings of an investigation into the Memphis Police Department, saying the city has already made hundreds of positive changes since the beating death of Tyre Nichols.

Although he didn’t rule out eventually agreeing to a consent decree with the Justice Department, Mayor Paul Young said he thinks the city can make changes more effectively without committing to a binding pact. The 17-month federal investigation launched after Nichols’ death found that Memphis officers routinely use unwarranted force and disproportionately target Black people.

“We believe we can make more effective and meaningful change by working together with community input and independent national experts than with a bureaucratic, costly, and complicated federal government consent decree,” Young said at a news conference.

His remarks came minutes after a top Justice Department official warned that the DOJ could sue to require reforms of Memphis’ police force should the city refuse to sign an agreement.

With a more police-friendly administration about to take over in Washington, the city could be biding its time in the hopes that the Justice Department under Donald Trump could let the matter drop. Neither Justice Department nor city officials were willing to delve into that issue — the mayor said he would have the same position regardless of the presidential election’s outcome; and acting U.S. Attorney Reagan Fondren said federal prosecutors will continue their work regardless of who’s in the White House.

The investigation determined that police in Tennessee’s second-largest city have violated citizens’ constitutional rights and civil rights, Assistant U.S. Attorney General Kristen Clarke said at a Thursday news conference, describing the lengthy review as “comprehensive and exhaustive.”

The police department’s practices violate the Constitution and federal law, and “harm and demean people and they promote distrust, undermining the fundamental safety mission of a police department,” Clarke said.

The fatal beating of Nichols by officers after he ran away from a January 2023 traffic stop exposed serious problems in police department, from its use of excessive force to its mistreatment of Black people in the majority-Black city, according to the investigation report released Wednesday.

Nichols, who was kicked, punched and beaten with a baton, died three days after his encounter with police. Nichols was Black, as are the former officers involved in his beating. His death led to national protests, raised the volume on calls for police reforms in the U.S., and directed intense scrutiny towards the Memphis Police Department, more than half of whose members are Black, including Chief Cerelyn “CJ” Davis.

The federal probe looked at the department’s “pattern or practice” of how it uses force and conducts stops, searches and arrests, and whether it engages in discriminatory policing.

It found that officers would punch, kick and use other force against people who were already handcuffed or restrained, which it described as unconstitutional but which were nearly always approved after the fact by supervisors. Officers resort to force likely to cause pain or injury “almost immediately in response to low-level, nonviolent offenses, even when people are not aggressive,” investigators determined.

“Memphis police officers regularly violate the rights of the people they are sworn to serve,” according to the report.

Memphis officers cite or arrest Black people for loitering or curfew violations at 13 times the rate it does for white people, and cite or arrest Black people for disorderly conduct at 3.6 times the rate of white people, the report said.

Police video showed officers pepper-spraying Nichols and hitting him with a Taser before he ran from a traffic stop. Five officers chased down Nichols just steps from his home as he called out for his mother. The video showed the officers milling about, talking and laughing as Nichols struggled with his injuries.

The officers were fired, charged in state court with murder, and indicted by a federal grand jury on civil rights and witness tampering charges. Two pleaded guilty to federal charges under plea deals. The other three were convicted at trial on split verdicts.

Although the report mentions the Nichols case, it also describes others, including one in which officers pepper-sprayed, kicked and fired a Taser at an unarmed man with a mental illness who tried to take a $2 soda from a gas station.

The investigation cited police training that “primed officers to believe that force was the most likely way to end an encounter,” rather than talking to a suspect to de-escalate a situation. In one training example, officers were told that, “If a fight is unavoidable, hurt them first and hurt them bad.”

In a Wednesday letter to the Justice Department’s Civil Rights Division, the city attorney said Memphis had received the a DOJ’s consent decree request but wouldn’t agree to one until it had thoroughly reviewed the report.

A consent decree requires reforms overseen by an independent monitor and approved by a federal judge. The federal oversight can continue for years, and violations could result in fines paid by the city.

Other police departments have faced federal investigations in recent years, including Minneapolis’ after the killing of George Floyd, and the police force in Louisville, Kentucky, following the fatal police shooting of Breonna Taylor.

Mattise reported from Nashville. Associated Press reporter Kristin M. Hall contributed from Chicago.

The US government is closing a women’s prison and other facilities after years of abuse and decay

posted in: News | 0

By MICHAEL R. SISAK and MICHAEL BALSAMO

WASHINGTON (AP) — The federal Bureau of Prisons is permanently closing its “rape club” women’s prison in California and will idle six facilities in a sweeping realignment after years of abuse, decay and mismanagement, The Associated Press has learned.

The agency informed employees and Congress on Thursday that it plans to shutter the Federal Correctional Institution in Dublin, California, and its deactivate minimum-security prison camps in Wisconsin, Minnesota, Colorado, Pennsylvania, West Virginia and Florida. Staff and inmates are being moved to other facilities, the agency said.

In a document obtained by the AP, the Bureau of Prisons said it was taking “decisive and strategic action” to address “significant challenges, including a critical staffing shortage, crumbling infrastructure and limited budgetary resources.” The agency said it is not downsizing and is committed to finding positions for every affected employee.

The closures are a striking coda to the Biden administration’s stewardship of the Justice Department’s biggest agency. After repeatedly promising to reform FCI Dublin and other troubled facilities, the Bureau of Prisons is pivoting to closures and consolidation, citing inadequate staffing and staggering costs to repair aging infrastructure.

The permanent shutdown of FCI Dublin seven months after it was temporarily closed in the wake of staff-on-inmate abuse is the clearest sign yet that the agency, which has more than 30,000 employees, 158,000 inmates and an annual budget of about $8 billion, is unable or unwilling to rehabilitate its most problematic institutions.

The Bureau of Prisons and the union representing correctional officers have repeatedly pushed for additional federal prison funding, highlighting what they say is an inadequate amount of money to address pay increases, staff retention and a multibillion-dollar repair backlog.

In a document summarizing the closures, the Bureau of Prisons said it decided to close FCI Dublin after a security and infrastructure assessment following its temporary closure in April. At the time, it appeared the agency was set on closing the low-security prison, but officials held out the possibility that it could be repaired and reopened for a different purpose, such as housing male inmates.

The assessment identified considerable repairs necessary to reopen the FCI Dublin, the agency said. Low staffing, exacerbated by the high cost of living in the Bay Area, also contributed to the decision to close the facility, the agency said.

“As the agency navigates a challenging budgetary and staffing environment, we must make incredibly difficult decisions. FCI Dublin will not reopen,” the agency said.

FCI Dublin’s permanent closure represents an extraordinary acknowledgement by the Bureau of Prisons that it has failed to fix the facility’s culture and environment in the wake of AP reporting that exposed rampant sexual abuse within its walls. Hundreds of people who were incarcerated at FCI Dublin are suing the agency, seeking reforms and monetary compensation for mistreatment at the facility.

The closures at FCI Dublin and across the federal prison system come amid an AP investigation that has uncovered deep, previously unreported flaws within the Bureau of Prisons. AP reporting has disclosed rampant criminal activity by employees, dozens of escapes, chronic violence, deaths and severe staffing shortages that have hampered responses to emergencies, including inmate assaults and suicides.

In July, President Joe Biden signed a law strengthening oversight of the agency after AP reporting shone a spotlight on its many flaws.

Sisak reported from New York.