Dakota County prosecutor won’t charge South St. Paul council member in daycare case

posted in: All news | 0

The Dakota County Attorney’s Office will not file criminal charges against South St. Paul City Council member Pam Bakken, saying there was no proof that a child at her daycare at ingested meth while under her care.

“This decision was made after a careful review of the evidence presented to my office,” said County Attorney Kathy Keena in a press release Tuesday.

The state could not prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the methamphetamine was ingested at Bakken’s in-home daycare, given the timing of the onset of symptoms.

South St. Paul City Council member Pam Bakken. (Courtesy of the City of South St. Paul)

“In general, symptoms like what the child displayed — talkativeness, restlessness and vomiting — would be expected to occur within one to three hours after ingesting meth, according to poison control,” the press release said. “Even assuming the child ingested meth while at the day care, the state is unable to prove that Ms. Bakken knew it was present in her home and that she intentionally or recklessly allowed the child to be placed in a situation likely to harm the child’s health, or that she deprived the child necessary supervision appropriate to his age.”

The press release gave the following additional details: On 7:10 a.m., Dec. 6, 2024, the child was dropped off at Bakken’s day care and then taken to preschool at 8:25 a.m. After preschool, the child returned to the day care at 11:30 a.m.

Staff at the day care noticed he was “acting out of character as he was very talkative, fidgety and had a hard time focusing,” the press release said. “The child was then served lunch and vomited shortly thereafter. His mother was advised that he was ill and was asked to pick him up. The child was brought to a local hospital as he continued to display the same abnormal behaviors. During the examination, the child tested positive for methamphetamine and amphetamines. He later told his mother that he ate something he found on a rug in the bathroom at day care that tasted ‘gross’ and resembled an ‘onion crumb.’”

Bakken’s in-home day care license remains suspended by the Minnesota Department of Human Services, following the recommendation by Dakota County Community Services. Bakken is appealing the suspension and a contested case hearing is scheduled for July 31.

A group calling for Bakken to step down previously filed paperwork seeking her official recall as a council member.

Related Articles


Two-vehicle collision in Bloomington kills woman, injures 3


Another federal judge expresses skepticism over Trump law firm executive orders


Former Memphis officers were frustrated when they fatally beat Tyre Nichols, prosecutor says


Job cuts delay Pentagon plans to expand work to prevent sex assaults and suicides


Former Jan. 6 prosecutor warns Trump’s pardons could encourage future political violence

The secret to a refreshing cocktail or mocktail might be growing in the garden

posted in: All news | 0

By JESSICA DAMIANO

If you enjoy a tasty, refreshing summer cocktail or mocktail, why not grow your own?

No, you’re not likely to grow the spirits — although they do come from plants (vodka from potatoes, tequila from agave and so on). But you can grow other ingredients that make those spirits delicious.

Tips for growing mint and other flavorful herbs

Mint is the easiest herb to grow. It’s so easy it may take over your garden if you aren’t careful, so plant it in a pot and keep the pot away from the soil. Place the pot in full sun and water it regularly. In a few short weeks, you’ll be able to pluck its leaves to liven up your lemonade or mint julep.

If you want to get creative, experiment with a few different varieties. My favorite is spearmint, but peppermint is classic. Chocolate mint, pineapple mint and apple mint each have their charms, named for the scents and flavors they impart. There’s even a specialty variety called Cuban mint, an authentic choice for mojitos.

Basil, too, is available in several cocktail-worthy varieties. Genovese, the Italian variety often paired with tomatoes, works equally well in beverages, as do lemon and cinnamon varieties. Plant them in full sun and provide water, but account for your climate and take care not to over- or underwater them. Remove flower stalks, if they appear, to prevent the leaves from turning bitter.

Lemon verbena smells heavenly and pairs as well with a gin and tonic as it does with sparkling water. Most herbs don’t usually require supplemental nutrients, but lemon verbena benefits from monthly applications of organic liquid fertilizer. Water plants when the soil begins to dry out; overwatering may lead to root rot.

When I have guests, I often muddle sage leaves with 1 ounce each of vodka and ginger liquor, then add to a glass with 4 ounces of ginger beer, and pineapple and lime juices to taste. It’s as simple as can be — and just as impressive.

For the most concentrated flavor, harvest herbs in mid-morning, after the dew has dried but before the sun gets too hot. In my garden, that means around 10 a.m. Place them, stem side down, in a glass of water indoors, out of direct sunlight, until happy hour.

This April 10, 2025, image provided by Jessica Damiano shows mint stems keeping fresh in a glass of water on Long Island, N.Y. (Jessica Damiano via AP)

Strawberries, cucumbers and heat

Don’t forget the strawberries (bonus: The plants come back every year in horticultural zones 4-9) and cucumbers, both mandatory components of a proper British Pimm’s cup, one of my favorite summertime cocktails.

I make mine by packing a highball glass with thinly shaved cucumber, sliced strawberries, mint and a couple of sliced mandarin rounds, then topping it with 1 1/2 ounces of Pimm’s No. 1 liquor and 4 ounces of lemonade or lemon-lime soda.

And if you like your drinks spicy, muddle a red-ripe slice of jalapeno with lime juice and pour a shot of tequila over it, then add your choice of mixer. Or drink it straight. I’m not judging you. I’m just the garden lady.

Jessica Damiano writes weekly gardening columns for the AP and publishes the award-winning Weekly Dirt Newsletter. You can sign up here for weekly gardening tips and advice.

For more AP gardening stories, go to https://apnews.com/hub/gardening.

How to avoid credit card late fees after a court threw out a proposed cap

posted in: All news | 0

By CORA LEWIS

NEW YORK (AP) — A Texas judge earlier this month threw out a federal rule that would have capped credit card late fees at $8.

Related Articles


Coca-Cola reports better-than-expected quarterly profit, says it can manage through tariffs


GM posts strong Q1 results, but will reassess expectations for 2025 due to auto tariffs


Amazon is not planning to break out tariff costs online as White House attacks potential move


UPS to cut 20,000 jobs, close some facilities as it reduces amount of Amazon shipments it handles


Major companies face a difficult task in estimating the impact of tariffs on their business

The Consumer Finance Protection Bureau finalized the rule last year as part of the Biden administration’s efforts to do away with what it called junk fees. It was paused by the courts before it could take effect.

At the time, the CFPB estimated that American families would have saved more than $10 billion in late fees annually had the fees been capped at $8, significantly less than the $32 average.

Banks and industry groups argued that the rule didn’t allow card issuers to charge fees high enough to deter late payments and discourage repeat violations.

The Texas judge’s ruling earlier this month came a day after a collection of major industry groups and the CFPB under President Donald Trump announced that they had reached an agreement to throw out the rule.

Here’s what to know about credit card late fees:

What is the average credit card late fee?

The average late fee for major issuers has steadily ticked up since the 2010s, going from $23 at the end of 2010 to $32 in 2022, according to the CFPB. WalletHub, which tracks financial data, found the average late fee in 2025 to be $30.50, with the maximum $41.

A September 2023 Consumer Reports study estimated that 1 in 5 American adults, or about 52 million people, paid a credit card late fee in the previous year. People with lower incomes pay proportionately bigger fees, according to the CFPB, with the highest burden falling on communities of color and those living paycheck to paycheck.

How can consumers avoid the fees?

Enrolling in auto-pay for your credit cards can help you avoid making late payments, and there are some credit cards that don’t charge late fees at all (though it’s important to note that these cards may have other fee or penalty structures, or higher interest rates.)

Citi Simplicity and the Apple card do not currently charge late fees, and Discover offers a card that will automatically waive the first late fee.

It’s also possible to appeal credit card late fees charged by your credit card company by calling them directly. The companies will often reverse the fees, especially if it’s your first late payment.

You may also want to consider making payments on your credit card balances during the month. That means you’ll have paid more of the balance by the time the amount comes due, and keeping your balance low relative to your credit limit can improve your credit score.

If you’re having trouble making ends meet, you can ask your credit issuers about hardship programs. These are typically available to people affected by job loss, illness or medical conditions, natural disasters, or other emergencies.

What was the CFPB credit card late fee cap rule about?

Concerned that credit card companies were building a business model based on high penalties, Congress passed the Credit Card Accountability Responsibility and Disclosure Act of 2009 (CARD Act), which banned the companies from charging excessive late fees and established clearer disclosures and consumer protections.

In 2010, the Federal Reserve Board of Governors voted to issue a regulation implementing the CARD Act, which said that banks could only charge fees to recover costs associated with late payment.

However, the rule included an “immunity provision” that let some banks charge $25 for the first late payment and $35 for subsequent late payments, adjusted for inflation each year. Those amounts subsequently grew to $30 and $41.

After a review of market data, the CFPB finalized a rule that would have capped late fees at $8 and ended automatic inflation adjustments. Based on records analyzed by the CFPB, a late fee of $8 would be sufficient for card issuers, on average, to cover collection costs incurred as a result of late payments.

How have banking groups responded to the court decision?

Industry groups, including the Consumer Bankers Association, American Bankers Association, the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, and others, said they welcomed the court’s decision eliminating the cap.

The groups said that the rule would have led to higher interest rates and reduced credit access for card holders. The groups also said the rule would have “reduced important incentives for consumers to manage their finances.”

The CFPB has estimated that banks bring in roughly $14 billion in credit card late fees a year.

How have consumer advocates responded?

Horacio Méndez, president and CEO of Woodstock Institute, an organization for advancing economic equity, called the ruling a “devastating blow.”

“By tossing out the CFPB’s common-sense rule to cap these predatory late fees — some as high as $41 — a federal judge is putting corporations over the lives of everyday consumers,” he said. “The CFPB’s rule was borne out of clear evidence: the credit card industry was using inflated late fees as a profit engine, forcing families with the least financial cushion to pay.”

Méndez said that while consumers have come to expect fees for services, those fees needn’t be punitive to be effective.

The Associated Press receives support from Charles Schwab Foundation for educational and explanatory reporting to improve financial literacy. The independent foundation is separate from Charles Schwab and Co. Inc. The AP is solely responsible for its journalism.

Blood pressure-lowering medication shows promise in new trial results

posted in: All news | 0

People with high blood pressure that is uncontrolled or poorly treated with most medications may benefit from a new drug that is showing promise in clinical trial results, according to a study published Wednesday in the New England Journal of Medicine.

Related Articles


How bugs and beet juice could play roles in the race to replace artificial dyes in food


Research: Delta-8 less potent but has similar misuse potential as cannabis when orally ingested


FDA scrutiny of Novavax COVID-19 vaccine sparks uncertainty about other shots


In rural Massachusetts, patients and physicians weigh trade-offs of concierge medicine


COVID worsened shortages of doctors and nurses. Five years on, rural hospitals still struggle

The study found that lorundostat, the drug made by Pennsylvania-based Mineralys Therapeutics, averaged a 15-point average decrease in participants’ systolic blood pressure, a finding that was a little more than double the reduction observed in patients who received placebo treatment. Conducted in 285 patients nationwide, including some living in San Diego County, the study’s findings are similar to those observed in a phase three trial of lorundostat conducted in 1,083 patients, for which preliminary results were released in March.

Systolic blood pressure is the higher of the two figures that patients are commonly quoted during regular medical checkups. It represents the force exerted on blood vessels when the heart beats.

Dr. Michael Wilkinson, the local principal investigator for the San Diego arm of the phase two study and a cardiologist at UC San Diego Health, said that the drug, which blocks the action of the hormone aldosterone, is particularly promising because of its ability to lower systolic blood pressure while also causing minimal complications. Aldosterone is known to cause water and sodium retention in the kidneys, increasing total blood volume and thus pressure which can damage blood vessels and other critical tissue in the body.

“The key to understanding the significance of the reduction in systolic blood pressure is that these are patients we see in our clinic who have uncontrolled hypertension, despite the use of two to five anti-hypertensive medications,” Wilkinson said. “These patients need new and additional options to treat their high blood pressure.”

Hypertension is a major risk factor for cardiovascular disease and is said to affect more than 120 million Americans.

Being able to reduce pressure by 15 points, he said, could be clinically significant, especially for those on the more extreme side of the scale.

“We would expect that being able to help these patients achieve safer blood pressure levels will make a significant difference in helping them to avoid heart attacks and strokes,” Wilkinson said.

UC San Diego, and several other smaller local clinical trial centers, are among 104 nationwide that participated in the phase two trials that enrolled patients with blood pressure measurements of at least 140/90 mm Hg. The randomized and placebo-controlled trial is open only to those taking, but not significantly benefiting from, between two and five anti-hypertension medications.

Participants were required to stop their existing medication regimens and adopt a standardized course of treatment before taking the drug, which was assessed either at a 50 milligram daily dose or in an escalating dose to 100 milligrams over the study’s 12-week course.