Should Lindsey Vonn been allowed to race?

posted in: All news | 0

CORTINA D’AMPEZZO, Italy — The fallout from Lindsey Vonn’s devastating crash in the Olympic downhill included a key question: Given her severely injured left knee, should she have even been allowed on a course that is dangerous even to perfectly healthy skiers?

The resounding answer on social media was no. The answer from the skiing community was yes.

Nine days before Sunday’s crash, the 41-year-old American ruptured the anterior cruciate ligament in her left knee. It is an injury that sidelines pro athletes for months, but ski racers have on occasion competed that way. She appeared stable in two downhill training runs at the Milan Cortina Games.

When she arrived in Cortina last week, Vonn said she had consulted with her team of physicians and trainers before deciding to move ahead with racing. The International Ski and Snowboard Federation does not check on the injury statuses of athletes.

“I firmly believe that this has to be decided by the individual athlete,” FIS president Johan Eliasch said Monday in Bormio. “And in her case, she certainly knows her injuries on her body better than anybody else. And if you look around here today with all the athletes, the athletes yesterday, every single athlete has a small injury of some kind.”

“What is also important for people to understand, that the accident that she had yesterday, she was incredibly unlucky. It was a one in a thousand,” Eliasch added. “She got too close to the gate, and she got stuck when she was in the air in the gate and started rotating. No one can recover from that, unless you do a 360. … This is something which is part of ski racing. It’s a dangerous sport.”

The Italian hospital in Treviso where Vonn was being treated said late Sunday she had undergone surgery to repair a broken left leg. The U.S. Ski Team has said only that Vonn “sustained an injury, but is in stable condition and in good hands with a team of American and Italian physicians.”

The hospital initially said it would release an update Monday, then said updates regarding Vonn’s condition would come from her team.

Pierre Ducrey, the sports director for the International Olympic Committee, noted Vonn was able to train and had experts counseling her decision.

“So, from that point of view, I don’t think we can say that she should or shouldn’t have participated. This decision was really hers and her team to take,” he said. “She made the decision and unfortunately it led to the injury, but I think it’s really the way that the decision gets made for every athlete that participates to the downhill.”

Onlookers on social media wondered if Vonn’s ruptured ACL could have played a factor in her crash near the top of the Olympia delle Tofana course, where she has a World Cup record 12 wins; that maybe, on a healthy left knee, she would not have clipped a gate and been able to stave off a crash.

“Totally incorrect,” Vonn’s teammate Keely Cashman — who was knocked unconsious in a serious crash five years ago — said Monday. “People that don’t know ski racing don’t really understand what happened yesterday. She hooked her arm on the gate, which twisted her around. She was going probably 70 miles an hour, and so that twists your body around. That has nothing to do with her ACL, nothing to with her knee. I think a lot of people are ridiculing that, and a lot people don’t (know) what’s going on.”

The hours after her crash were filled with opinions, mostly of the second-guessing nature. Like, should someone have intervened?

“It’s her choice,” veteran skier Federica Brignone of Italy said. “If it’s your body, then you decide what to do, whether to race or not. It’s not up to others. Only you.”

Brignone suffered multiple fractures in her tibial plateau and fibula bone in her left leg during a crash in April and made it back to compete in the Olympic downhill — finishing 10th.

American downhiller Kyle Negomir echoed that thought.

“Lindsey’s a grown woman, and the best speed skier to ever do this sport. If she made her decision, I think she should absolutely be allowed to take that risk,” Negomir said. “She’s obviously good enough that she’s capable of pulling it off. Just because it happened to not pan out yesterday doesn’t mean that it definitely wasn’t a possibility that she could just crush it and have a perfect run.”

AP Sports Writer Will Graves in Treviso and Daniella Matar in Milan contributed to this report.

Related Articles


Gremaud again denies Gu an Olympic gold medal in freeski slopestyle


Chloe Kim will ride Olympic halfpipe with a shoulder brace, says she’s anxious but also confident


Olympic town warms up as climate change puts Winter Games on thin ice


US figure skater Amber Glenn faces backlash over politics and copyright issues after Olympic gold


Curling: Americans seal medal shot with two victories Sunday

US stocks drift after big rallies that began in Asia run out of momentum

posted in: All news | 0

NEW YORK (AP) — A big rally for global stock markets that began in Asia on Monday petered out by the time trading got to Wall Street.

Related Articles


Arguments to begin in landmark social media addiction trial set in Los Angeles


Business People: Former IRS deputy counsel Teri Jackson joins Fredrikson


Real World Economics: Warsh would inherit Powell’s dilemma


Co-workers of different generations mentor each other to reduce workplace misunderstandings


Washington Post publisher Will Lewis says he’s stepping down, days after big layoffs at the paper

The S&P 500 slipped 0.2% in its first few minutes of trading. The Dow Jones Industrial Average was down 62 points, or 0.1%, as of 9:35 a.m. Eastern time, and the Nasdaq composite was 0.4% lower.

The modest moves followed a 3.9% burst higher for Japan’s Nikkei 225 to a record. Stocks rallied there following a landslide victory for the prime minister’s political party in a parliamentary election. The thought is that will give Sanae Takaichi more power to push through reforms that will boost the economy and market.

On Wall Street, the U.S. stock market took a breath following its own big rally on Friday, which was its best day since May. Several concerns still hang over the market, including criticism that stocks have simply become too expensive. The S&P 500 is near its all-time high set last month.

Worries are also rising about whether all the huge spending by Big Tech and other companies on AI will actually produce enough profit to make the investments worth it.

Several other markets that have been whipping through particularly violent moves over recent weeks were also showing some more relative calm.

Bitcoin dipped back below $69,000 after climbing above $71,000 over the weekend. It had dropped close to $60,000 last week, more than halfway below its record set in October.

Gold added 1.2% to climb back above $5,000 per ounce. It’s been swinging sharply after roughly doubling in price over 12 months and has bounced between $4,500 and nearly $5,600. Silver, whose price has been even wilder, rose 3.0%.

In the U.S. stock market, Kroger climbed 6.1% after the grocer named a former Walmart executive as its new chief executive officer.

On the losing end was Workday, which fell 5.9% after the AI platform said its CEO, Carl Eschenbach, is stepping down. Company Co-founder Aneel Bhusri is returning as chief executive.

Transocean slipped 1% after the offshore drilling company said it would buy Valaris in an all-stock deal valued at $5.8 billion. Valaris soared 22.3%.

In the bond market, Treasury yields held relatively steady ahead of several potentially market-moving reports coming later in the week. The U.S. government will offer the latest monthly update on the health of the job market on Wednesday, along with on inflation at the consumer level on Friday.

Either report could sway expectations on what the Federal Reserve will do with interest rates. The Fed has put its cuts to interest rates on hold, but a weakening of the job market could push it to resume more quickly. Too-hot inflation, on the other hand, could keep it on hold for longer.

One of the reasons the U.S. stock market remains close to records is the expectation that the Fed will continue cutting interest rates later this year. Lower rates can give the economy a boost, though they can also worsen inflation.

The yield on the 10-year Treasury held at 4.22%, where it was late Friday.

In stock markets abroad, indexes jumped across Asia with Japan’s surge. South Korea’s Kospi leaped 4.1%, while stocks rose 1.8% in Hong Kong and 1.4% in Shanghai.

The moves were more modest in Europe, where indexes were mixed.

AP Videojournalist Mayuko Ono and AP Business Writer Elaine Kurtenbach contributed.

The New ‘Poor Door’: Amenity Fees Are Too High for Affordable Housing Tenants

posted in: All news | 0

Tenants who get affordable housing through the city’s lottery or a rental assistance voucher often can’t afford amenity fees in new mixed-income luxury buildings, creating what one described as a “two-tiered system” within New York City rentals.

Joseph Jones, 61, outside his rental building in the South Bronx. He uses a rental voucher, and says the $250 monthly fee to use the building’s amenity spaces means he and other affordable tenants are locked out. (Patrick Spauster/City LImits)

“How can I be loitering in my own home?”

Joseph Jones, 61, is standing in the well-furnished lobby of his apartment building on Bruckner Boulevard. the South Bronx.

The clock is ticking.

According to a building policy, tenants can only spend 15 minutes at a time hanging out in the building’s lobby. Just downstairs in the basement is a lounge, game room, and gym where tenants are welcome to stay as long as they like.

It just costs $250 a month.

Jones, an affordable housing tenant who lives on disability and uses a city-issued housing voucher, can’t afford an extra couple thousand dollars a year to pay for access to his building’s numerous amenities.

He’s one of several low-income tenants in the building who say that lack of access creates tension between affordable tenants, market rate tenants, and management.

Affordable housing in New York City is increasingly found in mixed-income buildings. In exchange for a tax break, subsidy, or more square footage, developers set aside a percentage of units in new buildings for affordable housing available through the city’s affordable housing lottery.

Tenants who win lottery apartments or use a voucher in new luxury apartment buildings in the five boroughs told City Limits that the high cost of amenity fees creates income-segregated spaces within their buildings.

“We’re really talking about fairness and equity. [The Department of Housing Preservation and Development (HPD)] believes that all tenants, affordable and market-rate, should have equal access to amenities, regardless of income, rent, or unit type,” said Natasha Kersey, a spokesperson for HPD, in a statement to City Limits.

But with few hard rules about amenity pricing for the city’s housing agency to enforce, tenants say that many buildings have fee structures that make it impossible for lower-income tenants to afford.

Those tenants say pay-to-play amenities sharpen class lines in their communities, and harken back to times when developers would sometimes create separate entrances for affordable and market rate tenants: a practice called the “poor door.” New York State barred buildings from using separate entrances for affordable tenants in 2015.

“My first thought was that it was making a two-tiered system,” said Amber Jensen, who won the housing lottery for a residential-to-office conversion in downtown Manhattan but is worried about paying amenity fees out of pocket.

A tale of two buildings

Walk four blocks west from 40 Bruckner, where Jones lives, and you hit the Maven, a towering 27-story new luxury building built in 2021.

At the Maven, a gym, pool room, screening room, and coworking space are included in the cost of rent. Voucher holders—who typically pay 30 percent of their income in rent each month, with the city paying the rest directly to the landlord—get access to all of it.

A sign in the lobby of The Bruckner House about time limits.
(Patrick Spauster/City Limits)

Jones says that he comes over to the Maven every week to shoot pool with a friend who lives there and also has a voucher. But when he goes back home, he can’t sit in his own lobby for 20 minutes or use any of the communal spaces.

Staff for JCS Realty, which operates Bruckner House, did not respond to detailed questions from City Limits about their amenity pricing and lobby rules.

Amenity fees in new buildings can range from $45 to several hundred, according to affordable housing lottery tenants and owners who shared the information with City Limits.

The range in pricing means that at some buildings, tenants get access to amenities that can help them stay healthy, socialize, and relax. At other buildings, affordable and market rate tenants scarcely interact, despite sometimes sharing walls.

At Bruckner House, residents say the divider between the rich and poor is not a doorperson, but a key fob.

One day last summer, voucher holder Fred McKay and another affordable housing tenant, Byron Brown, wanted to play dominoes. If you have the amenity fob, you can swipe into a game room in the building’s basement.

But they couldn’t afford the amenities, so they started up in the building’s lobby, they said, but were asked to leave because of the 15 minute time limit.

So Brown went up to his room and got a folding table and chairs and brought it outside to the corner.

Byron Brown, a tenant at the Bruckner House, said he and a friend were told they couldn’t play dominoes in the building’s lobby. (Patrick Spauster/City Limits)

“We played like two or three games out there for maybe 45 minutes,” said Brown. Then the police pulled up in response to a complaint and gave them a ticket.

“This building is too much, man,” said Brown. “They’re a piece of work.”

Another tenant at Bruckner House—a woman who asked to remain anonymous out of fear of retaliation from the landlord—said that having access to the gym would have made a big difference for recovering from injuries she sustained in a car accident.

Without access to equipment at home, she could only do some of her physical therapy exercises when she paid for a visit at her physical therapist’s office.

The city and state impose a few rules on property owners when it comes to building perks. They can’t charge affordable tenants more than market rate tenants, or use amenity fees as a hidden rent increase for rent-stabilized tenants, and they must be optional.

HPD said it also has “guidelines” that encourage discounted amenities for low-income households to keep costs proportional. They also suggest developers break amenity packages into individual services so tenants can pay for what they need.

The Bruckner House at 40 Bruckner Blvd. (Patrick Spauster/City Limits)

“Our guidelines help ensure fees are transparent, optional, and proportional, applied equally across affordable and market-rate units, and clearly disclosed in leases. Every tenant needs to be able to fully enjoy the shared spaces in their community,” a spokesperson said. 

Those guidelines, according to the agency, apply to all mixed-income projects that don’t require developers applying for a zoning change.

The problem, tenants say, is that guidelines are just that: guidelines, not hard rules. 

Landlords have a great deal of discretion on how much to charge, and for what. That discretion has led to unequal outcomes, some tenants say.

“That feels very discriminatory to me,” said Jensen. “It’s not passing the smell test.”

Tenants speculate that having poor tenants in the building use the amenities is bad for marketing.

“Our comfortability bothers them,” said McKay. 

‘At that price, it’s impossible’

At The Set, a sparkling 44-story tower in Hudson Yards, tenants must pay $1,000 a month to use the city’s rooftop club, complete with a swimming pool.Survey

“At that price, it’s impossible,” said Genesis Martinez, an affordable housing lottery winner who lives in a small one-bedroom apartment in the building with her two daughters, 1 and 4.

A one-bedroom in the building goes for over $7,500 a month. Martinez pays $1,400 for a low-income lottery unit.

“They want to keep a certain atmosphere on the roof and maybe they feel like the middle class tenants will mess that up so they purposely price it prohibitively,” said Brian, another affordable housing tenant at The Set. Brian asked City Limits to withhold his full name out of fear of retaliation.

Sometimes exorbitant fees at these buildings create two different cultures—those who can afford to pay and those who cannot. At The Set, multiple affordable housing tenants told City Limits that they inquired about a discounted program for tenants that occupy affordable units, but there was no such subsidy available.

“There’s no community area for us,” Brian said.

The Set, a mixed-income luxury building at 455 10th Ave. in Hudson Yards, where access to amenities costs $1,000 a month. (Adi Talwar/City Limits)

The Related Companies, which owns and manages The Set, said that it was an outlier case that supplies premium services like housekeeping, and food and beverage services. 

“The vast majority of our mixed-income rental buildings in the City offer a heavily discounted amenity fee, either tiered by [income level] or a fixed-rate, to ensure all residents have the option of accessing those amenities. Each property is unique in terms of the offering,” said a spokesperson for the company.

At one of their buildings, Riverwalk Park, Related said they offer subsidized amenity pricing depending on the income level of the household, ranging from $7 a month for formerly homeless units to $30 a month for middle income units.

City Limits inquired about amenity pricing with leasing agents at a half dozen other affordable housing lottery buildings. All but one said amenity fees are non-negotiable and they do not provide discounts to affordable housing tenants. 

At Brookfield’s Two Blue Slip, another new building in Greenpoint, management agents say they increase amenity fee rates at a lower rate in affordable apartments compared to market rates.

The problem, tenants say, is that there is little consistency between buildings. Even affordable housing tenants with far more reasonable fees say they cannot afford the extra bill each month. 

At Brookfield’s Two Blue Slip in Greenpoint, management agents say they increase amenity fee rates at a lower rate in affordable apartments. (Patrick Spauster/City Limits)

Jensen, a 64 year old domestic violence survivor who has been living in a shelter for 18 months, applied to the lottery at 25 Water St., voucher in hand, expecting to pay $50 or $75 for amenities in the new building. But at $150 a month, it gave her second thoughts, especially since she’d have to commit for a full 12-month lease term.

“It was kind of a surprise to me,” she said. 

She signed a lease including the amenities but will have to scrounge together an extra $1,800 a year to pay for them. “Other than the location, the amenities were the other reason I wanted to live in that postage stamp apartment,” Jensen said. 

Her City Fighting Homelessness and Eviction Prevention Supplement (CityFHEPS) voucher would pay up to $2,600 for a studio, but the base rent is only $2,200.

“Why didn’t they just charge more and include [amenities]?” asked Jensen. If amenities were free—or priced into rent—her voucher would help pay for them.

“It would completely take the stress off of me,” she said. “The only thing I could think of is because they’re planning on raising the prices later.”

The City Council has made several changes to the CityFHEPS program in recent years to help low income tenants. Passed in 2023, Local Law 99 prohibits the Department of Social Services from deducting a utility allowance from the voucher amount, an effort to make more apartments available regardless of whether utilities were included in the rent or a separate charge.

But the city has also been trying to rein in the costs of the program—by cutting incentives for landlords, trying to increase payment amounts for longtime residents, and upgrading data systems to reduce processing time. Comptroller Mark Levine says CityFHEPS will cost $2 billion by the time the fiscal year ends in June, a big reason for the city’s larger than expected budget deficit.

Mayor Zohran Mamdani has pledged to build 200,000 affordable apartments in the city over the next 10 years. A significant portion will likely be in mixed income buildings, enabled by state tax incentives and recent “City of Yes” zoning changes designed to incentivize denser and affordable development.

Whether those future tenants will be able to enjoy everything new buildings have to offer remains to be seen.

To reach the reporter behind this story, contact Patrick@citylimits.org. To reach the editor, contact Jeanmarie@citylimits.org

Want to republish this story? Find City Limits’ reprint policy here.

The post The New ‘Poor Door’: Amenity Fees Are Too High for Affordable Housing Tenants appeared first on City Limits.

Gremaud again denies Gu an Olympic gold medal in freeski slopestyle

posted in: All news | 0

By JOSEPH WILSON, Associated Press

LIVIGNO, Italy (AP) — Mathilde Gremaud successfully defended her Olympic freeski slopestyle title and denied Eileen Gu a gold medal for a second straight Winter Games.

Gremaud won Monday’s final with a score of 86.96 from the best of her three jumps, while Gu again took silver behind her Swiss rival with her best effort of 86.58.

Gu needed a huge score on her final run when she had one last chance to better Gremaud, but that run barely lasted. Gu skittered off the first rail and toppled to her side, dashing her title hopes.

Knowing she had locked up the gold after Gu fell, Gremaud tied a Swiss flag around her neck and wore it like a cape as she cruised down the course on her victory lap. After coming off the course, she embraced her teammates to celebrate her fourth career Olympic medal. Nearby, ecstatic supporters waved Swiss flags.

Gremaud, who turned 26 the day before the final, has now beaten Gu twice in Olympic finals by the slightest of margins: 0.33 points in 2022, and 0.38 in 2026.

Canada’s Megan Oldham claimed bronze.

That tricky rail doomed Gu

Strong as Gremaud was in the jumps, Gu was undone by the railing section at the start of her run.

Related Articles


Chloe Kim will ride Olympic halfpipe with a shoulder brace, says she’s anxious but also confident


Olympic town warms up as climate change puts Winter Games on thin ice


US figure skater Amber Glenn faces backlash over politics and copyright issues after Olympic gold


Curling: Americans seal medal shot with two victories Sunday


Vonn’s Olympic fall: Breaking it all down

Gu led after the first of three runs when she nailed her routine, but Gremaud laid down her winning run on her second go to move to the top of the points table. Gu then wobbled off the rail on her second run; even though she kept her balance, but the mistake resulted in a low score.

That same rail section had caused Gu to fall during Saturday’s qualifying, when she had to execute perfectly on a second go to advance to the final.

But when it mattered most on Monday and Gu had her last shot to snatch a win, the result was the same: Just seconds into her run she went tipping off the rail and tumbled in the snow.

Gu, who was born in America but competes for China, became a global star at the 2022 Beijing Games where she won three medals, including gold in freeski halfpipe and big air. She will now turn to defending her titles at these Games.

Gremaud’s medal chest includes a silver in slopestyle from the 2018 Winter Games and a bronze in big air from 2022. She is also a two-time world champion in slopestyle in 2025 and 2023, among other titles.

In slopestyle, skiers perform acrobatic tricks while skiing over rails and jumps that are judged for difficulty and execution. The Livigno course consists of three rail sections followed by three jumps. The best score of the three jumps counts.