Late heroics lead Twins to eighth-straight win

posted in: News | 0

CHICAGO — The Twins’ winning streak lives on.

After seven straight games in which the Twins scored at least five runs, it looked as if their offense had met its match in starter Garrett Crochet and the White Sox bullpen on Monday. Through the first eight innings of the game, Minnesota had managed just two hits.

But in the ninth, the offense came alive. Byron Buxton hit a leadoff double and Max Kepler brought him home with a clutch single, helping propel the Twins to a 3-2 win over the White Sox at Guaranteed Rate Field.

It was Minnesota’s eighth straight win — a feat which it has not accomplished since 2011 — lifting the Twins to two games above .500 on the season.

Though the offense was quieted through the middle innings — Crochet went five frames, retiring the last 11 batters he faced — it just did enough early to keep Minnesota competitive.

Carlos Santana hit his fourth home run in five days, this one a two-run shot. As he returned back to the Twins’ dugout, Santana was greeted by Ryan Jeffers near the top step. Jeffers threw the Twins’ good-luck sausage to him and Santana leapt up to snag it.

That home run tied the game shortly after Minnesota starter Joe Ryan had gotten in trouble in the first inning.

The first three batters Ryan faced all collected hits and by the time he had gotten out of the first, the Twins were trailing by two. But Ryan was nearly untouchable after that, pitching six innings and giving up just three more hits.

He took a no-decision, though he kept the team in position his team to win.

After his departure, Brock Stewart pitched a perfect seventh. Griffin Jax (2-2) worked around some trouble in the eighth to keep the game tied and Caleb Thielbar came in for his second save. Thielbar allowed a pair of baserunners before striking out Korey Lee to end the game.

Related Articles

Minnesota Twins |


Twins welcome star Carlos Correa back from injured list

Minnesota Twins |


Could a sausage be to thank for the Twins’ dramatic turnaround?

Minnesota Twins |


Twins break out the bats, sweep Angels for seventh straight win

Minnesota Twins |


Now with Angels, former Twins outfielder Torii Hunter ponders future in baseball — perhaps as a manager

Minnesota Twins |


Miguel Sanó is back in the majors, and Twins are happy to see it

Supporters, opponents of state trooper charged with murder face off at Minneapolis courthouse

posted in: Politics | 0

MINNEAPOLIS — Supporters and critics of a white Minnesota state trooper who’s charged with murder for killing a Black motorist confronted each other at a courthouse Monday in an exchange that was heated but peaceful, reflecting the strong emotions that the politically charged case has generated.

More than 300 people, including law enforcement officers from several agencies, gathered in the Hennepin County Government Center in solidarity with Trooper Ryan Londregan ahead of a pretrial hearing in his case. He’s charged with second-degree murder, manslaughter and assault for fatally shooting Ricky Cobb II as Cobb tried to drive away from a traffic stop last summer. A similarly large crowd aligned with the Black Lives Matter movement shouted down an attempt by Londregan’s defense team to hold a news conference afterward.

“Trooper Londregan followed his training,” defense attorney Chris Madel was able to tell reporters. He noted that the defense team filed sworn declarations from four current and former troopers who say Londregan’s use of deadly force was justified. Madel also called for “a prosecutor who cares about the facts more than they do about yelling,” before the shouts of “Whose streets? Our streets” grew too loud.

“No good cops in a racist system,” the protesters also chanted. “No justice, no peace. Prosecute the police.”

Four former federal prosecutors from the Washington, D.C.-based law firm Steptoe LLC will be deputized to take over the case from the office of Hennepin County Attorney Mary Moriarty after the original leader of the prosecution team stepped away from the case, said Chris Freeman, managing attorney for the office’s adult prosecution division.

Protesters pack the lobby of the Hennepin County Government Center after a hearing in the murder case against Minnesota state trooper Ryan Londregan on April 29, 2024, in Minneapolis. (AP Photo/Mark Vancleave)

Freeman did not address news reports that Assistant County Attorney Joshua Larson had removed himself as lead prosecutor, but confirmed to Judge Tamara Garcia that Larson is no longer on the case.

Moriarty later said in a statement that she would retain full authority over the case and pay the attorneys out of her existing budget. She named Karima Maloney, Michael Bromwich, Ryan Poscablo and Steven Levin as the new team.

Law enforcement and Republican leaders have been calling on Democratic Gov. Tim Walz to take the case away from Moriarty, a former public defender who was elected on a platform of police accountability following the murder of George Floyd by a Minneapolis officer in 2020, and turn it over to Democratic Attorney General Keith Ellison. Walz has expressed concern about the direction of the case but has not acted.

In a jab at the incoming prosecution team, Madel told reporters they’d rather the case went to “somebody who cares about justice more than hourly fees.”

The Minnesota Police and Peace Officers Association organized a show of support for Londregan before the hearing. The crowd, including many people wearing T-shirts proclaiming his innocence, greeted him with loud cheers and sustained applause as he and his defense team entered the courthouse.

Troopers pulled the 33-year-old Cobb over on Interstate 94 in Minneapolis on July 31 because the lights were out on his car. They found that the Spring Lake Park man was wanted for violating a protection order in neighboring Ramsey County. Londregan arrived to assist. They were telling Cobb to get out when he shifted into drive and took his foot off the brake. Cobb’s car began to slowly move forward. Londregan reached for his gun. Cobb stopped. Londregan pointed his gun at Cobb and yelled at him to get out. Cobb took his foot off the brake again while another trooper’s torso was at least partially in the car. Londregan then fired twice at Cobb, striking him both times in the chest, the criminal complaint says.

Cobb’s family filed a federal civil rights lawsuit two weeks ago, alleging that the stop and shooting were unjustified.

The judge set two dates for future hearings. The new prosecution team will introduce itself to the court at 1:30 p.m. on May 15, and there will be a fuller hearing June 10 at 9 a.m. to set a trial date and discuss motions by the defense to dismiss the charges for lack of probable cause and alleged prosecution misconduct.

Arguing that the charges lack sufficient grounds, Madel noted during the hearing that the prosecution has yet to name an expert witness who could testify that Londregan’s actions weren’t justified. Garcia said they can discuss a deadline for disclosure of prosecution expert witnesses at the May 15 hearing.

The misconduct allegation includes the defense claim that the criminal complaint filed by prosecutors misrepresented statements by the Minnesota State Patrol’s lead use-of-force trainer, by omitting that expert’s conclusion that Londregan did nothing wrong.

Related Articles

Crime & Public Safety |


Woman gets probation for setting off firework that destroyed St. Paul apartment building

Crime & Public Safety |


Man sentenced to 16 years in prison for fatal punch near downtown St. Paul light-rail station

Crime & Public Safety |


Battle of the Badges ax-throwing contest to benefit families of fallen Burnsville first responders

Crime & Public Safety |


A Minnesota senator faces a felony burglary charge. Here’s what happened and what could happen next.

Crime & Public Safety |


St. Paul 14-year-old fatally shot at Minneapolis gas station early Friday

Minnesota House to vote on 3 gun control measures, including safe storage requirement

posted in: News | 0

Members of the Minnesota House were set to vote Monday on three gun control bills — a safe storage requirement, a requirement to report lost and stolen guns in a timely manner, and stronger penalties for straw purchases.

The three measures have the most support of any gun control bills introduced at the Capitol this session, though they likely will only pass with support from Democratic-Farmer-Labor lawmakers.

Legislative leaders signaled ahead of session that safe storage and stolen gun reporting would be the main gun-related bills advancing this year. Straw purchase penalties became a higher priority after the killing of two police officers and a firefighter in Burnsville in February.

The House took up the three measures Monday afternoon and debate was expected to carry on late into the evening.

Safe storage

First on the agenda in the House Monday was a bill sponsored by Rep. Kaohly Vang Her, DFL-St. Paul, to create a reporting requirement for lost and stolen firearms.

If the bill became law, a person who owns or possesses a firearm would have to report the loss to a law enforcement agency within 48 hours of the time the person knew or reasonably should have known of the loss or theft.

The first violation would be a petty misdemeanor. Second offenses would be a misdemeanor and third violations would be a gross misdemeanor.

Supporters say a reporting requirement will aid law enforcement efforts to track stolen weapons, which are often used in crimes. Opponents question whether it’ll actually prevent crime.

Safe storage

The House also is expected to to take up a bill to mandate that firearms stored in the home to either be unloaded and locked or stored in a gun safe. Anyone found in violation could face felony penalties if the firearm is used in a crime.

The measure’s main sponsor is Rep. Jamie Becker-Finn, DFL-Roseville.

Proponents say requiring guns to be locked up will curb thefts and prevent children from gaining access to weapons, though opponent say locking up guns can make them less useful for self-defense.

The measure is backed by Rep. Jamie Becker-Finn, DFL-Roseville.

Straw purchases

Higher straw purchase penalties became a priority this session after the February shooting of Burnsville police officers Matthew Ruge and Paul Elmstrand, and firefighter/paramedic Adam Finseth.

The shooter, Shannon Gooden, was prohibited from owning a gun after pleading guilty to assault with a dangerous weapon in 2008 but was still able to obtain one. Ashley Anne Dyrdahl, Gooden’s girlfriend, was federally indicted in March for straw purchasing two AR-15-style firearms. Dyrdahl has pleaded not guilty.

Increasing penalties for those who buy guns for others not eligible to purchase guns — known as straw purchasing — has support from both Democratic-Farmer-Labor and Republican lawmakers.

But the House DFL version of that bill contains additional gun control provisions Republicans are unlikely to support, meaning Democrats likely will have to move forward without GOP backing.

The bill carried by Rep. Kaela Berg, DFL-Burnsville, also would ban binary triggers, which give firearms a rapid rate of fire by allowing them to fire both when the trigger is depressed and released. Republicans raised concerns about straw purchase penalties and another restriction being bound together.

Senate hurdle

DFLers have a multiple-seat majority in the House, meaning they’ll likely pass. But the bills may have a tougher time in the Senate, where the DFL has 34 seats to Republicans’ 33.

Some DFL senators from northern rural districts may be hesitant to vote for gun control bills.

Related Articles

Politics |


Walz names Tikki Brown head of new state agency focused on children, families

Politics |


Sen. Mitchell returns to Minnesota Capitol with her arrest looming over final weeks of session

Politics |


A Minnesota senator faces a felony burglary charge. Here’s what happened and what could happen next.

Politics |


DFL Sen. Nicole Mitchell says she won’t resign as state senate begins probe into felony burglary charge

Politics |


Other voices: Schools’ public notice plan would reduce access and harm transparency

Advocates, Lawmakers ‘Baffled’ By Exclusions in Basement Legalization Plan

posted in: News | 0

“I’m surprised, I’m baffled, I’m angry,” said City Councilmember Sandy Nurse, who represents East New York, where the city ran an earlier basement conversion pilot in 2019. The area is excluded from the new program, which will only apply to 15 of the city’s 59 community districts.

Adi Talwar

Homes on Cleveland Street near Arlington Avenue in Brooklyn Community District 5, where the city launched a basement/cellar conversion pilot program in 2019. A new initiative authorized by the recent state budget excludes the area.

A new pathway for the legalization and conversion of basement and cellar apartments in the city was included in this year’s state budget—but excludes many of the neighborhoods hardest hit by flooding in recent years.

Housing advocates have long called for a plan to regulate the estimated tens of thousands of subgrade apartments across the city, often low-cost units rented by working class and immigrant New Yorkers. Most existing basement and cellar homes are occupied illegally, making them more vulnerable to unsafe conditions, and tenants now face increased risk of flooding in the face of climate change-driven extreme weather.

“I was a brand new governor for about a week when Hurricane Ida hit. I walked those streets in Queens. I saw what happened in places and homes where people were flooded and literally drowned in their own home because they were trapped in those illegal basement apartments,” Gov. Kathy Hochul said on WNYC’s The Brian Lehrer Show last week. “That was one of the reasons I said we must bring them into code.”

But in a surprise, only a single Queens community district—CD 2, which encompasses Long Island City—was selected to participate in the pilot program authorized by the state budget, despite the wider region’s susceptibility to flooding and the basement drowning deaths of 11 people in other parts of the the borough during Hurricane Ida in 2021.

A total of 15 community districts were selected to participate in the five-year pilot, including four in the Bronx (districts 9, 10, 11, and 12), four in Brooklyn (districts 4, 10, 11 and 17), and six in Manhattan (district 3, 4, 9, 10, 11 and 12), but only one in Queens and none on Staten Island.

Just as surprising was the exclusion of Brooklyn Community District 5 (CD5) in East New York, which was the guinea pig for an earlier basement legalization pilot attempted under Mayor Bill de Blasio’s administration in 2019.

“This was a surprise. I’m extremely disappointed that CB5 was specifically excluded from this effort,” said City Councilmember Sandy Nurse, who represents the 37th Council District that includes Brooklyn CD5. 

That earlier pilot program, while stymied in its reach by funding issues and other complications, also saw significant interest from property owners who wanted to take part. 

“This would have been a home run for any state elected official to come back to CB5 and say [that] we got this for the district, given that almost 1,000 households wanted to participate,” Nurse added.

Now, the onus lies with the city to devise and implement the pilot program. Projects in the community districts selected by the state would, in essence, be exempt from parts of the state’s Multiple Dwelling Law (MDL), which regulates the construction, maintenance, and safety standards of buildings containing three or more residential units.  

It was a major barrier to the success of the city’s earlier East New York pilot, kicking in when a two-family home sought to legalize its basement or cellar, subjecting those properties to stricter regulatory requirements and driving up the costs of conversions.

The City Council must now pass legislation to institute the new program, define its implementation approach, and decide how or if the MDL exception will function within these community districts, according to a city staffer.

While the budget deal granted the city the authority to establish a legalization program within the designated community districts, it’s separate from any actual funding for conversions, with the financing framework for the pilot still to be determined.

One potential avenue for funding lies in the Plus One ADU program, announced in November, which incorporates a combination of state grants and city funding earmarked for owners to create or convert Accessory Dwelling Units (ADUs) on their properties, including basements. The program accommodates ADUs compliant with current regulations, which excludes many basement units due to the existing state MDL—though the city could now change that with its newly granted authority.

“We had set aside $85 million for ADU and basement conversions. The city is getting money every year from the state to do that,” said Assemblymember Harvey Epstein, who has sponsored a basement apartment legalization bill since 2021.

“We’ll see if they can use that money to help homeowners who need to do the conversion and assist them in ensuring that there’s affordable housing for them,” said Epstein, who called the budget deal on basements “an important first step.”

The basement initiative comes as the city embarks on an effort to ease other zoning rules to create more housing through Mayor Eric Adams’ City of Yes for Housing Opportunity, for which public review officially kicked off Monday.

Among the changes it seeks to make is to eliminate parking mandates for new residential development, which proved another hurdle for basement conversions in the East New York pilot: 36 percent of properties were dropped from the program during pre-screening because they couldn’t accommodate the required parking, according to a report last year from the Citizens Housing and Planning Council.  

During a City of Yes Zoom press briefing on Friday, Department of City Planning Chair Dan Garodnick discussed how parking mandates had hindered housing creation and that by “eliminating a mandate, we will create much more flexibility for different types of housing across the board.”

“We think it’s important that we have the opportunity for a pilot to legalize basements. And, of course, zoning is a piece of that puzzle, but by no means the only piece of that puzzle. So we were really encouraged by what the state came up with,” he said.

Adi Talwar

Jessica Katz, the city’s former chief housing officer, speaking at a March 2023 rally for basement legalization in Jackson Heights. The neighborhood is excluded from the pilot program authorized by the recent state budget deal.

In a statement following release of the state budget, the BASE Coalition, a collective advocating for a safe pathway for basement apartment legalization, said the program “was long overdue” and would help improve safety in the community boards selected to participate.

“The City of New York now has significant power and opportunity to embark on a basement conversion program in many vulnerable communities,” the group said.

But the Coalition added that it is “extremely disappointed by the geographic limitations of this regulatory relief,” and “concerned by the lack of transparency regarding the selection process for eligible Community Districts.”

Sadia Rahman, deputy director of policy at Chhaya Community Development Corporation and a member of the BASE Coalition, said the city has already learned a lot from the original East New York pilot program. 

“That was the beauty of the East New York pilot; it gave the city the opportunity to look under the hood and really tinker with and identify each of the provisions of the code that would need to be modified in order to make these conversions easier, and so a lot of that work has been done already for the pilot, and we just need to expand that citywide,” said Rahman.

Howard Slatkin, a former deputy at the New York City Department of City Planning and now executive director of the Citizens Housing & Planning Council, another BASE member, also criticized the geographic restrictions, alluding to potential political motives: some state lawmakers have opposed basement legalization, citing safety concerns.   

“Calling this a ‘pilot’ was the fig leaf that allowed them to play politics with boundaries,” said Slatkin. “What we see instead is some version of political boundary salad that the state legislature has put out.” 

State Sen. Brian Kavanagh, who sponsored the broader legalization bill with Epstein, acknowledged the opposition to a more comprehensive initiative. 

“Some of my colleagues have argued that effectively you would be rewarding property owners for doing something that’s improper,” he told City Limits Monday. The smaller pilot, he added, “may allow people who have been skeptical of this approach to see its merits.”

“Getting a pilot in place that will allow the city to design a program, determine which aspects of the MDL are obstacles to legalizing, and making these apartments safe and launching the program is a very significant step forward,” he said.

But Councilmember Nurse called for those who pushed for the geographic exemptions to answer for those exclusions. 

“I’m surprised, I’m baffled, I’m angry,” Nurse said, “and I think whoever got in the way of Community Board 5 participating and moving forward with the work we’ve been doing for almost a whole decade, I think that they’re gonna have to be held accountable for that.”

With additional reporting by Emma Whitford.

To reach the reporter behind this story, contact Chris@citylimits.org. To reach the editor, contact Jeanmarie@citylimits.org

Want to republish this story? Find City Limits’ reprint policy here.