House moves to hold Attorney General Merrick Garland in contempt for withholding Biden audio

posted in: News | 0

By FARNOUSH AMIRI (Associated Press)

WASHINGTON (AP) — The House is expected Wednesday to vote on a resolution holding Attorney General Merrick Garland in contempt of Congress for refusing to turn over audio of President Joe Biden’s interview in his classified documents case, a move that comes just weeks after the White House blocked release of the recording to lawmakers.

The contempt action represents House Republicans’ latest and strongest rebuke of the Justice Department and of Garland’s leadership, playing out against the backdrop of an extraordinary conflict over the rule of law that has animated the 2024 presidential campaign. Republicans have denounced the pending criminal cases into former President Donald Trump, their presumptive nominee for the White House, while making sweeping claims about what they view as corruption in Biden’s administration.

“We have to defend the Constitution. We have to defend the authority of Congress,” House Speaker Mike Johnson said at a press conference. “We can’t allow the Department of Justice and Executive Branch hide information from Congress.”

Yet despite the GOP feelings about Garland, it remains uncertain if Johnson can garner enough support on the floor to pass the contempt resolution. Republicans have the slimmest of majorities, which means that any bill that lacks Democratic support — like the contempt resolution — can quickly collapse if even a few Republicans defect.

Republican leaders looked to ease concerns about the vote count Wednesday morning coming out of their weekly conference meeting.

“We just talked about it with the membership. Nobody raised any questions. Obviously, with a two-seat majority, everything is close. … I think people understand how important it is to get it done and to get the facts out,” Majority Leader Steve Scalise said.

“Ronald Reagan said trust but verify. Why not show the audio to verify?” he added.

Republicans were incensed when Special Counsel Robert Hur declined to prosecute Biden over his handling of classified documents and quickly opened an investigation. GOP lawmakers — led by Reps. Jim Jordan and James Comer — sent a subpoena for audio of Hur’s interviews with Biden during the spring. But the Justice Department only turned over some of the records, leaving out audio of Hur’s interview with the president.

If efforts to cite Garland are successful, he will become the third attorney general to be held in contempt of Congress. But it is unlikely that the Justice Department — which Garland oversees — would prosecute him. The White House’s decision to exert executive privilege over the audio recording, shielding it from Congress, would make it exceedingly difficult to make a criminal case against Garland.

The White House has repeatedly slammed Republicans’ motives for pursuing contempt and dismissed their efforts to obtain the audio as purely political.

Garland has defended the Justice Department, saying officials have gone to extraordinary lengths to provide information to the committees about Special Counsel Hur’s investigation, including a transcript of Biden’s interview with him.

“There have been a series of unprecedented and frankly unfounded attacks on the Justice Department,” Garland said in a press conference last month. “This request, this effort to use contempt as a method of obtaining our sensitive law enforcement files is just most recent.”

On the last day to comply with the Republicans’ subpoena for the audio, the White House blocked the release by invoking executive privilege. It said that Republicans in Congress only wanted the recordings “to chop them up” and use them for political purposes.

Executive privilege gives presidents the right to keep information from the courts, Congress and the public to protect the confidentiality of decision-making, though it can be challenged in court.

Administrations of both political parties have long held the position that officials who assert a president’s claim of executive privilege can’t be prosecuted for contempt of Congress, a Justice Department official told Republicans last month. Assistant Attorney General Carlos Felipe Uriarte cited a committee’s decision in 2008 to back down from a contempt effort after President George W. Bush asserted executive privilege to keep Congress from getting records involving Vice President Dick Cheney.

The last time an attorney general was held in contempt was in 2019. That was when the Democratically controlled House voted to make then-Attorney General Bill Barr the second sitting Cabinet member to be held in contempt of Congress for refusing to turn over documents related to a special counsel investigation into former President Donald Trump.

Years before that, then-Attorney General Eric Holder was held in contempt related to the gun-running operation known as Operation Fast and Furious. In each of those instances, the Justice Department took no action against the attorney general.

The special counsel in Biden’s case, Hur, spent a year investigating the president’s improper retention of classified documents, from his time as a senator and as vice president. The result was a 345-page report that questioned Biden’s age and mental competence but recommended no criminal charges for the 81-year-old. Hur said he found insufficient evidence to successfully prosecute a case in court.

In March, Hur stood by the assessment in testimony before the Judiciary Committee, where he was grilled for more than four hours by both Democratic and Republican lawmakers.

His defense did not satisfy Republicans, who insist that there is a politically motivated double standard at the Justice Department, which is prosecuting former President Trump over his retention of classified documents at his Florida club after he left the White House.

But there are major differences between the two probes. Biden’s team returned the documents after they were discovered, and the president cooperated with the investigation by voluntarily sitting for an interview and consenting to searches of his homes.

Trump, by contrast, is accused of enlisting the help of aides and lawyers to conceal the documents from the government and of seeking to have potentially incriminating evidence destroyed.

__ Associated Press writers Kevin Freking and Alanna Durkin Richer contributed to this report.

Shooting in St. Paul’s Payne-Phalen kills man

posted in: Society | 0

A man was killed in an early morning shooting in St. Paul’s Payne-Phalen area.

Police responded to the 800 block of East Maryland Avenue just after 1:30 a.m. on reports of shots fired and someone having been shot, said Sgt. Mike Ernster, a police spokesman.

Officers found a man with multiple gunshot injuries and St. Paul Fire Department medics pronounced him dead at the scene.

Police searched the area for possible suspects, whom they didn’t find, Ernster said. The police department has been looking for evidence and witnesses, and investigators are working to determine what happened and who is responsible.

Investigators are asking anyone with information to call them at 651-266-5650.

The police department plans to release the victim’s name after the Ramsey County Medical Examiner’s Office confirms his identity.

Related Articles

Crime & Public Safety |


Maplewood church fire under investigation as arson

Crime & Public Safety |


Woman sentenced to probation for holding four workers hostage at St. Paul gas station

Crime & Public Safety |


Mom of Burnsville boy, 8, says he was trying to protect her when father fatally shot him

Crime & Public Safety |


President Joe Biden’s son, Hunter Biden, is convicted of all 3 felonies in federal gun trial

Crime & Public Safety |


Minneapolis police officer killed while responding to a shooting call is remembered as a hero

2024 Bush Fellows include six from St. Paul, Ramsey and Washington counties

posted in: News | 0

A few years before losing her mother and grandmother, Jouapag Lee teamed with five other like-minded professionals to talk about healing from traumas — both recent and historical — in the Hmong refugee community. One member of the Hmong Healers Collective was a substance abuse counselor. Another was a spiritual energy healer. The year was 2019, and little did they expect that the pandemic — which had a disproportionate impact on Hmong families — would offer plenty of lessons about grief, loss and recovery against the backdrop of a national wave of anti-Asian hate.

Jouapag Lee. (Courtesy of the Bush Foundation)

Then, in 2022, her mother and grandmother died within months of each other, shortly before the birth of her second child, opening up for her an even more personal understanding. Lee now hopes to expand her trauma studies, in part by learning from Jewish communities in the Netherlands and an indigenous community in Australia, an effort made possible with financial support from the St. Paul-based Bush Foundation.

The foundation has selected 24 fellows from a pool of nearly 600 applicants to receive funding for two-year leadership awards. The fellows, including six from St. Paul and Ramsey and Washington counties, hail from Minnesota, North Dakota, South Dakota and the 23 Native nations that share the same geography.

The 24 award winners will each receive up to $100,000 to fund their education and other grant-supported pursuits in their desired field. Fellows were selected through a review process that included interviews and mentoring sessions with community leaders, Bush Fellow alumni and Bush Foundation staff.

Counseling, healthcare and cultural growth

Several of the recipients have ties to counseling, healthcare and cultural growth.

“As folks are working one-on-one with individual clients, they start seeing the need for systemic and community collective change, and the Bush Fellowship is oftentimes for folks who work in the healthcare field to start working on the collective level,” Lee noted.

Archibald “Archie” Bush, a Duluth bookkeeper with the company that would grow to be known as 3M, founded the foundation in 1953 with his wife, Edyth Bush. The foundation was set up with few restrictions, with the goal that board members would have flexibility to address changing needs of the day over time.

“I’m still kind of in shock,” said Bush Fellow awardee Trahern Crews, the chair of the St. Paul Recovery Act Community Reparations Commission. “This is is surreal.”

Among the 24 award winners:

Mari Avaloz. (Courtesy of the Bush Foundation)

Mari Avaloz of St. Paul: After her sister — for whom she was primary caregiver — died of ovarian cancer in 2019, Avaloz wanted to make it her mission to help other Latin families navigate healthcare systems while dealing with barriers like language, documentation and familiarity with the industry. She plans to use her Bush Fellowship to enroll in an intensive Spanish immersion program, obtain a graduate social work license, learn from other healthcare leaders working in the cancer field and the Latin community, and complete courses related to her own leadership in healthcare. Avaloz has been employed by St. Olaf College for 23 years, including more than a decade as director of its TRIO/Upward Bound program, and holds a master’s degree in clinical social work from the University of St. Thomas.

Adrean Clark. (Courtesy of the Bush Foundation)

Adrean Clark of St. Paul: As a deaf author and illustrator, Clark found few places where American Sign Language-speaking deaf artists could publish their works. She co-founded a publishing company to showcase the work of other sign language speakers and established an online dictionary for written ASL that eventually became known as the “ASLwrite” method. With her Bush Fellowship, she plans to pursue her doctorate at Concordia University in Montreal, Quebec and expand her research on how ASL is represented on paper. She has published several books, and shares her comics and zines at adreanaline.com.

Trahern Crews. (Courtesy of the Bush Foundation)

Trahern Crews of St. Paul: Crews, a co-founder of Black Lives Matter Minnesota, has been a vocal advocate for Black Minnesotans, an effort that gained greater attention after the murder of George Floyd, a Black man, in Minneapolis, at the hands of a Minneapolis Police officer. With Crews acting as co-chair, the St. Paul City Council established a legislative advisory committee on the subject of recovery and reparations for institutionalized and structural racism. Based on the work of the committee, the city council in 2023 then established the St. Paul Recovery Act Community Reparations Commission, which he chairs. Crews, who recently joined a national network of reparations commissioners, plans to use his award to connect Black Lives Matter Minnesota to similar efforts in other states, as well as enroll in college courses and training in public speaking through Toastmasters and other opportunities.

Jouapag Lee of Roseville: Inspired by her upbringing as the eldest of five children of Hmong refugee parents, Lee became a founding member of the Hmong Healers Collective to share practices for healing within her community. She hopes to create what she described as a “culturally grounded space for Hmong American millennials to learn the histories of oppression and trauma and explore what collective healing could look like in their community.” She will use her Bush Fellowship to obtain a trauma-informed coaching certificate through the Institute for Professional Excellence in Coaching and St. Catherine University, strengthen her written Hmong language skills, work with a coach to develop sustainable business practices, and travel with her father, husband and children to Laos and Thailand to further connect with her Hmong roots. She is program evaluator with the Margaret A. Cargill Philanthropies and former employee of LISC and the St. Paul Promise Neighborhood.

Kasim Abdur Razzaq. (Courtesy of the Bush Foundation)

Kasim Abdur Razzaq of St. Paul: As both a mental health counselor and a Black Muslim male, Razzaq has long focused on topics seemingly taboo in the communities he travels. The importance of mental health is often disregarded in his circles, so he focuses on giving other Black males and Muslims the language to describe their personal experiences in a context rooted in culture. He plans to use his Bush Fellowship to focus on his own health practices and build capacity to support more Black mental health professionals.

May Lee Xiong of Cottage Grove is a 2024 recipient of the Bush Fellowship. (Courtesy of the Bush Foundation)

May Lee Xiong of Cottage Grove: Xiong grew up in Minnesota feeling disconnected from her Hmong culture, but later gained inspiration from the stories she was exposed to about her immigrant parents and their journey to America. She went on to help co-create the Hmong Studies and Hmong Dual Language programs at Phalen Elementary School in St. Paul. With her Bush Fellowship, she said she will seek ways to deepen her understanding of language revitalization and “build her skills to advocate for transformative changes in public education.”

Related Articles

Local News |


Free car emissions repair program offered at metro area auto shops

Local News |


Multi-family housing planned at The Heights on hold for at least a year

Local News |


Marine Village School to hold ‘A Night Out’ event On June 22

Local News |


Clothed in empowerment: Dress for Success Twin Cities assists women on career tracks

Local News |


There’s a new pageant in town: Miss Juneteenth Minnesota crowns five new queens

Bruce Yandle: From the Boston Tea Party to today’s targeted tariffs: What happened?

posted in: Adventure | 0

For a nation with roots in a rambunctious 1773 Boston Tea Party protesting British tariffs, it’s odd to see both major-party White House contenders trying to outdo each other with promises of tariffs. We’ve come a long way from the first Independence Day, which was sparked by a fundamental notion that a representative democracy would enable Americans to plot their own destiny, economic and otherwise.

Eager Boston patriots, we know, had something much bigger than the price of tea in mind: taxation without representation. The resulting revolution delivered a new order under heaven — a democracy — promising life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. And democracy, despite being one of humankind’s prized inventions, does leave open the opportunity for special interests to gain at the expense of other, less adept, members of the body politic.

The latest proposed tariffs — import taxes, in truth, that we pay — will put even more limits on the flow of computer chips, batteries, solar panels and steel. They also prevent Americans from accessing $10,000 electric vehicles (yes, $10,000!) and hybrids capable of traveling more than 1,000 miles on a full tank and charge.

Yes, these vehicles are produced in China, but they’re on the road and heading out of factories. Just not here. Of course, China is in many respects an adversary and tariffs are viewed as a geopolitical tool. But if it’s quite so simple, why target EVs and chips? Chinese imports are everywhere; why not hit a much broader range and really sock it to them? As always, there’s more to the story.

While we always see through a glass darkly when trying to understand political workings, Mancur Olson’s 1965 seminal work, “The Logic of Collective Action,” offers clarity. Political efforts to pass out pork tend to be most successful when the largesse goes to members of relatively small, highly organized interest groups and the costs are spread across a vast number of consumers.

The unorganized consumers — making livings, raising families, focused on top-line political concerns — are “rationally ignorant” about much of what their government is doing. Who has time to read Federal Register notices? That means they’re mostly unaware that life is more expensive because tariffs are imposed on imports or tax dollars are doled to those who control money, votes or lobbyists.

Look again at the Chinese electric vehicles. The new $10,000 model, produced by the firm BYD, has not yet been sold in America, and thus, the proposed 100% tariff doesn’t really affect what we think of as the price of vehicles.

When asked, Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen explained: “They’re very carefully targeted at sectors that we’re supporting through legislation that President Biden passed with Congress, the clean energy sector, semiconductors, sectors where we consider it critical to create good jobs.” Put another way, U.S. automakers and unions should love the targeted tariffs, and consumers won’t know what’s happening.

Does that mean functionally blocking a product that consumers might love to access has no effect? Of course not; it’s just harder to see on paper. Currently, the Congressional Budget Office is required to assess the effects of most of Congress’ new laws. The Joint Committee on Taxation analyzes tax changes. Shouldn’t a president be required to provide the public with a full economic assessment for tariffs?

That might help give us a fair ledger. One side would show how Joe Biden and Donald Trump’s love affair with selecting and blocking competitive products from abroad benefits organized interests. These might include the United Auto Workers (380,000 members strong in 2023) and the “Big Three” automakers (which produced 10 million vehicles). It may also include portions of the U.S. auto and steel industries who have joined hands with UAW to put pressure on Canada to duplicate U.S. tariffs on China.

The other side of the ledger would show how all these new, targeted tariffs affect a far-larger collection of people who, by and large, don’t know what they’re missing.

Of course, we ordinary, unorganized Americans will learn to pursue happiness inside the tariff walls, while politicians and special interest groups smile as they gain office and go to the bank. But if the Founders were around to see this, I suspect they’d suggest some ways to require accountability to We The People.

Bruce Yandle is a distinguished adjunct fellow with the Mercatus Center at George Mason University, dean emeritus of the Clemson University College of Business & Behavioral Science, and a former executive director of the Federal Trade Commission. He wrote this column for Tribune News Service.

Related Articles

Opinion |


David French: The day my old church canceled me was a very sad day

Opinion |


Jackie Calmes: Which is it, Biden the mastermind or Biden the bungler?

Opinion |


F.D. Flam: Americans need COVID insight. Congress blew its chance

Opinion |


Lisa Jarvis: Zyn is following Big Tobacco’s playbook for teens

Opinion |


Carl P. Leubsdorf: Nixon understood what Trump won’t acknowledge